michel sends to mr. james murdoch on the 9th of november, 2010, relate ld to a meeting he and mr. michel had with one of your two special advisers, is that correct? >> yes. >> and in terms of division of responsibilities between your special advisers, what, if anything, is he responsible for? >> he's, um, principally responsible for economic policy, he has a ph.d. in economics, and and he provides me with policy advice. >> and the relevant e-mail is under tab 9, it's page in the prop file 01665. do you have it in hand, mr. osborne? >> i will in a minute. yeah. >> it's stated -- it's dated, as i said, the 9th of november. you've had a conversation with mr. harrison s that correct, about what we see in this e-mail? and can you tell us, please, which part he agrees and he does not agree? >> well, the first i saw of this e-mail or, indeed, he saw of this e-mail is when it was brought to the attention of this inquiry because it's an internal e-mail. he says, and i believe him, that there was a general discussion that was not focused on the bskyb bid. of there was a reference in the e-m

we will start off with mr. james cagney. please, welcome the poet james cagney.applause] >> there is sun. there is sun. there is a snake on the path sunning. there is sun.

good morning mr. james, how are you feeling this morning. he would say i am stepping, but not high. isn't that wonderful? okay. okay. i go play down by the creek. he would say yes, tkarlg, but be particular. that meant be careful because i love you and don't want anything to happen to you. it was coded in the be protected. he often said be careful now. that meant one thing, be particular, there was stuff down by the creek and he wanted me to be careful and watch because he didn't want anything to happen to me. be particular did it all. when he would say when you go over there, i want you to walk and hold your head up like you belong to somebody. that meant you were representing your family. i want you to carry yourself in a way that you represent your family well with. he didn't have to go through all of that. hold your head up and act like you belong to somebody. if you didn't, you were growing up like a weed. i love dunbar for that reason. fast forward many years later, i am a teacher of 8th grade english. i want to give my students dunbar. there is nothing for young readers. so i

>> mr. james harden, why -- why the beard? why not only mustache? huh? >> what'd you say?y mustache? mustache is more sexy. let me ask you, are you a hatfield or mccoy? >> what? [ laughter ] >> beard or mustache? i mean, beard or mustache? >> beard. >> beard? why? >> i don't know. i just like the look. >> look at my mustache. it's more sexy. [ laughter ] >> it's thicker, and i like the beard better, though. >> yeah? >> yeah. you should get one now, man, because it's kind of creepy, you just got the mustache. >> all right. beard or mustache? >> i like the mustache. >> me too. >> yeah, i like your mustache. >> look, it's class. it's nice. it's all clean and everything. >> yeah. >> and the beard is like messy, huh? >> messy, yeah. >> when you drink cereal, you get all messy, huh? >> yeah, a little b h folusi interview with dwyane wayne. how are you doing? >> dwyane wade. >> dwyae wao >> wayne? >> wayne? e >> how do you spell it? >> w-a-d-e. >> w -- that's what i'm saying, wayne. >> you're saying wayne. >> wayne? >> yes. >> and what is it? >> it's wade. >> wayne? >> all right.

we will start off with mr. james cagney. please, welcome the poet james cagney.applause] >> there is sun. there is sun. there is a snake on the path sunning. there is sun. there is water in the stream, there are daisies, there are sun. there is a snake on the path sunning, there is sun. there are trees, there are daisies there is a feather there is sun. there is the feather that she gave me there is a feather there is sun. there are daisies there are words trees things there are more things than words, there is sun, there is sun. there are fox tails there are

we will start off with mr. james cagney. please, welcome the poet james cagney.applause] >> there is sun. there is sun. there is a snake on the path sunning. there is sun. there is water in the stream, there are daisies, there are sun. there is a snake on the path sunning, there is sun. there are trees, there are daisies there is a feather there is sun. there is the feather that she gave me there is a feather there is sun. there are daisies there are words trees things there are more things than words, there is sun, there is sun. there are fox tails there are blank there are irises that are blank there is a snake on the path in the path sunning. there is a squirrel in the trash, there is sun. there is water in the stream, there is a squirrel in the strash, there is a snake in the path on the sun sunning. there is is sun. there is song, there is a song being sung by the birds in the su

mr. james murdoch 15 and for rebekah brooks 19. in relation to her does that cover all social interactions or not? >> this is for the period when i was in opposition? >> the short answer, it might not. what wep did did go back over the diaries for the time i was leader of opposition. try and work out if we missed anything out but it doesn't always include -- for example diary count captured my decisions. there could be other meetings in there i haven't identified. going through other participant meetings we found some that didn't tally with us. we've been through and tried to reconcile as much as possible. i mean government is different because certainly in the office you have a diary -- john major explained this. a diary of what you want to do and a diary of what you actually do. in the office opposition was our best attempt but made gaps. >> it's going to lead to others if so karng the. mr. murdoch's list doesn't quite match yours but quite frankly an area of comparison in our view which we're just going to leave it there. >> it'

. >> back o'hare airport waiting for mr. james kluppelberg could you describe your day? >> remarkable day. it has been exciting nerve wracking at * times the joy and excitement finally free after all of these years people know the truth you are innocent versus the fear of what comes next >> any words of anchor? >> no that is any motion anger there is no benefit to nothing that can be gained from that i just want to move forward. no idea what is next one day at a time. i will keep moving forward see what happens. >> james kluppelberg free man after 24 years in prison >> and john edwards a free man tonight after a north carolina jury not guilty one count of violating campaign finance law also declared a mistrial on the be made and five counts injury did not reach a decision prosecutors accused using nearly $1 billion from two wealthy donors for hiding mistress and the child after to predict today does not blame anybody but himself. >> i am responsible if i want to find the person accountable for my sins honestly cannot go further than the mirror. it is me. >> prosecutors h

mr. brown, your full name question >> james gordon brown. >> you gave a statement the 30th of may, 2012 and it has a standard statement of truth. you signed it. is it your formal evidence to our inquiry? >> yes, it is. >> mr. brown, thank you very much for the work that has gone into the inquiry. i'm sorry about this morning being slightly delayed. >> thank you very much. >> may we start with your general,? on the bottom of the first page of your statement, you refer to secure link -- securing the right balance of the freedom of the media and privacy of citizens. implicitly and that is that there and in balance and presence. how you do that without impinging on the freedom of the media? >> the starting point has been the complaint made by families that would support the field -- the freedom of the press, but they are worried about the threat made to their privacy as individuals. i think the lord justice put it who will guard of the guardians? who will defend the defenseless? we have got to provide answers in a situation where we have to freedom is competing with each other. i have had some

coverage of the 2012 colby military writers' symposium in northfield, vermont, concludes with james hornfischer. mr. hornfischer discusses his book, "neptune's inferno," and takes audience questions for little under an hour. >> good afternoon. it is my distinct pleasure to present to you today at our colby symposium writer and speaker james hornfischer. joran fisher has quickly establishing himself as doing for the navy what type of historians stephen ambrose did for the army. this quote is from the rocky mountain news, and i feel that it fits james hornfischer very aptly. mr. hornfischer is the author of three works of naval history. "the last stand of the tin can sailors," published in 2004, one samuel the -- award and was recently named by naval history magazine as one of a dozen all timetable classics. his second book, "ship of ghosts," about the cruiser uss houston, was a main selection of the history book club and the military book club, and the winner and 2007 of the united states maritime literature award. his most recent book, "neptune's inferno," published in 2011 is a major new account o

our first presenter is mr. james h. freis. director of financial cres foen network athe pantfrey. sten,llel y t yndd morning. chairwoman cap toe, ranking member maloney and -- >> could i ask you to pull the hope? for some reason that microphone -- yes. thank you. >> i'm jim fss ai' eato hois efforts to establish a meaningful regulatory framework for mobile payments and other emerging payments methods. my testimony today will focus on me of the most important bedo t enimdalalo e heinal system aztec logical advances create innovative ways to move money. at theutset, i would like to make a distinction between mobile banking and mobile paymts. while mobile banking volv mmatanrenm ccolouir coat depository institution, mobile payments essentially involve the directions of funds outside of a bank account to effect payments or other transfers. let me emphasize that both types rent fen-phen regulations either as part of the requirements on banks or as part of the requirements on money transmitters. recognizing that payment syste olve rly fphto reivpr i t ea yr ago specifically to cover mob

was the lunch with mr. james murdoch. did you get as a were quiet words from the other side on occasion to the best of your recollection? >> no, i don't. i remember distinctly having -- it must've been very much in th air at the time. about when we as a government would hold a referendum or change the electoral them on  charged issue. i remember that being the tim at that time or something close  my opportunity in. my vote was mr. harding or rebecca brooks or mr. hardingo t my case for change in the event i don't think i've been much of an impression. but that i do remember the lunch. that was a subject that i do no remember coming up but not much c) all.c)c)c)c)c)c)c) >> certainly the impression is, and you have confirmed thisc)c)) c)ready, mr. clegg, that sincec) been in government there've bee) fewer meetings of editors andk)) proprietors and possibly since december of last year, has been) evenk)k) fewer.

there was also a new agenda by mr. james murdoch around the future of mediai was not surprised at all and -- i was perhaps surprised -- was perhaps surprised about the way that he did it, which was a strange thing to do. the act of deciding to go with the conservatives. i think it had been planned over many, many months. >> the account in the book was that the shift in support stunned him, his words, and that it graded on you more and more. is that accurate? >> i do not think so. i had accepted it. i had never complained to "the sun" when they did not give us support. i do not think you should be dependent on people by begging them to support you in this way. perhaps if i and my part if i did not ask them directly, i never complained to them directly when they withdrew support from the labour party. >> he is making a personal observation about you. >> i do not think that the word "stung" is correct. you could read it for months. i expected it to be something the you could read four months previously. but that was their choic

>> with relation to the murdochs, top right, page 12, there are only two relevant meetings with mr. james murdoch. if you see that. then the list of your meetings with mr. rupert murdoch, you put in a revised schedule recently. >> it was a kind of office that gave me the information. i gave you the information that they gave me originally. >> we will publish the schedule. removing the meeting from the fifth of october, 2007, you say that it did not take place. there was, according to exhibit 27, mr. murdoch's statement, there was a meeting on the sixth of october. i thought that there was also by phone call on the fourth. that may not be right. he is meeting staff on the sixth of october. nothing since the fourth of october. if we could deal with one. in evidence, it relates to the snap election, if you could call it that, in 2007. a pre recoed interview with you on saturday, the sixth of october. we know that there was dinner at checkers with mr. murdoch, his wife, and others, on the evening of the sixth of october, 2007. . [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] >> i do

on those occasions it may be difficult to remember but mr. james murdoch discussed the bbc license fee for example? ? >> i cannot pretend that i remember. all of those meetings legal i became a leader in february of 2008. many people didn't know me from adam. the first year or two i was keen to take an example to explain why was and what my ambitions were for my party. i simply don't remember. >> two occasions when you met with rupert murdoch, december 16th, 2009 dinner, rebekah brooks -- >> there were a fairly large number of people there and sometimes at the end of the table. didn't have -- teaching interaction with rupert murdoch before dinner and say goodbye. and as an observer as much as anything else. >> the thirteenth of january 2010, dinner with a group of people from the telegraph stable. was that close on that occasion? >> that was very much a sort of series of meetings and lungees and dinners close to the general election and manifesto ideas, purely political, me trying to persuade the paper which i never had any illusions would never co

mr. issa from james cole. in it he says i stress that the department remains willing to work toward a mutually satisfactory resolution of this matter, so why can't we work together? i would like to publicly thank mr. micca for working across the aisle on the transportation bill and hopefully this can move forward in a bipartisan way, and i think we should work across the aisle on getting this resolved in a way that satisfies the chairman and the members on both sides of the aisle and the fact that he has made an offer to continue discussions we should follow up, and i think that this offer reinforces the points that my good friend the congressman norton was making that the justice department is opened to working towards some type of conclusion. i would like to say we have never censureed a cabinet offer. i think it was people or had a contempt vote and i can't remember. you can probably remember. never a cabinet officer and never the highest ranking member of law enforcement for our country who is willing to w

mr. attorney general. james cole, deputy attorney general has written that the department has a greater obligation than just checking the legal sue efficient ency in approving wiretap application. he thinks applications have to comply with doj policy. is that correct? >> applications have to agree with doj policy? >> that's what he said. >> sure. >> okay. during a transcribed interview deputy assistant attorney general jason weinstein testified that senior officials approving the wiretap applications do not read the wiretap applications. is this practice acceptable to you? >> they read summaries of the applications. that's a process that's been used by this administration and by all previous administration. it's the way in which the office of enforcement -- >> are you aware that federal judges to your knowledge -- >> can i answer my question? >> no, you've given me a sufficient answer considering the amount of questions i have and the amount of time i have. you're okay with that practice. you've already answered

the insurers are large and have market power and can negotiate much better rates. >> host: mr. james cosgrove, explained a little bit about why this demonstration was such a big project. from your report, it is by far the biggest demonstration that has been conducted on the health care system. >> guest: we look at all the medicare demonstrations that have taken place since 1995. we identified 85 of them. if you total all the money that was spent on those 85 demonstrations, you come up to a little bit more than $5 billion. that is just for -- that is adjusting for inflation. we are talking about apples to apples. it is seven times larger than the next most expensive demonstration that medicare has run since 1995. >> host: why were they allowed to do such a big demonstration? why did it have to be a national demonstration and not regional or on a smaller scale? >> guest: that is one of the things we are concerned about and we point out in the report. by doing it nationally, there is no comparison group. usually when you do some kind of a test coming you have an experimental group and y

mr. cameron the third of may you had lunch with james murdoch, page 04225.as discussed correctly at the launch. i'm sure that over the years i've discussed some of those issues with james murdoch. he's got very strong views on them. i've got very strong views on the. they are not really the same views, and i'm sure we would have had discussions about it. perhaps particular well i think probably on both i don't recall the specifics but i'm sure we must have with strong views. >> this is a few months before his mactaggart lecture, which was delivered i think in late august of '09. did you have any discussions with them about the subject matter of that lecture i vacated or afterwards of? >> not to my memory, no. i think these would've been, as i say, most of these meetings were really about me trying to promote a conservative policy and the concert approach and the rest of the. but sometimes i'm interested -- have long-standing views. sometimes i'm sure we would have discussed them. >> one can see the intensity of his feeling. if you can put it in those terms.

mr. murdoch's reaction to what, lord hand ellison? answer: to switch to the labour party which was james and rebecca's decision, not the editor's, incidentally. >> first of all, there was only one call with mr. murdoch, and it was on november the 10th, and that was a call that was related to afghanistan. and you've got five letters that are a after kates from people who were on that call, four of them on the call, one who had to report to the press what happened afterwards, and they make it absolutely clear that that call was about afghanistan. and whatever you are reading out and whether you're referring to that call or not, i don't know. but the november the 10th call is the only call i had in a year with mr. murdoch. and i don't know if you're in a position to confirm that that is the case on behalf of news international or not. as for what happened on september the 20 30th when the conservative party was given the information, if you like, of "the sun," there was no call. there was no discussion. there was no text. there was no conversation with mr. murdoch at all. and i don't know how -- i notice that questions are coming from core part

our first presenter is mr. james h. rees, director of financial crime enforcement network at the department of treasury. welcome. i welcome your statement. >> thank you and good morning. chairman woman capito -- for some reason that microphone -- thank you. >> i am jim freis, direct growth than some staffers to establish a meaningful regulatory framework for mobile payment to another american payment that is. my testimony today will focus on some of the most important regulatory analytical work being done to prevent criminal abuse of the financial system as technological advances create innovative ways to move money. at the outset i would like to make a distinction between mobile banking and mobile payments. mobile banking involves communication and direction from an account holder about their account at a depository institution. mobile payments essentially involves the directions of funds outside of a bank account to affect payments or other transfers. me emphasize that those types of activities are subject to relevant

you know, james harden has had a tough series so far, but his look is magnificent. he looks like a cross between mr lumberjack. [ laughter ] james harden has a lot of fans in oklahoma city, of course, but his biggest fan is another famous athlete who's not from oklahoma city. he does have an unusual look of his own. his name is mike tyson, and tonight he pays tribute to james harden in so ♪ who's that man ♪ he's the best off the bench ♪ he's coming to play ♪ like his beard ♪ and i pity the fool ♪ that gets in his way ♪ james ♪ james ♪ james harden ♪ metta world peace elbows him in the head ♪ ♪ but he's tough ♪ he's not dead ♪ that's inconceivable ♪ james harden ♪ he wears a bow tie because he's classy ♪ ♪ everybody loves him just like lassie ♪ ♪ but lassie's dead ♪ man, lassie was a really cute doing ♪ ♪ can't believe he's dead ♪ i'm so sad ♪ really so sad snlz h♪ ♪ hey mike ♪ mike tiyson ♪ >> wow. hey, lassie. >> hey, don't be sad that i'm dead. now, how's about finishing that song? >> wow. okay, cool. ♪ james harden ♪ he's not dead [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: thank you, mike. tonight on the

mr. attorney general. james cole, the deputy attorney general, has written that the department has a greater obligation than to approve wiretap applications. he thinks wiretap applications have to comply with department of justice policy. >> sure. >> during a transcribed interview, a deputy assistant attorney general testified that senior officials approving the wiretap of applications do not read the applications. is this practice acceptable to you? >> that is the process used by this administration and all previous administrations. >> are you aware that federal judges to your knowledge -- >> can i answer your question? >> you have given me a sufficient answer considering the amount of time i have. would you agree senior officials are responsible for documents they signed? i will assume the answer is yes. jason weinstein, is he's responsible for what is in these wiretaps? -- is he responsible for what is in these wiretaps? >> he did not create that material. he would have been the person who would have reviewed

so that would cover, i suppose, the 23rd of december, 2010, conversation you had with mr. james we refer to -- >> absolutely. he would be covered by this. he would definitely be covered by this, absolutely, newspaper, owners, chairman, senior editors. i think i was making a slightly different point, which relates to the question you asked me earlier about sort of old personal friends who are somewhere around that level or just below. >> is that convenient? >> certainly for the afternoon. >> president obama laid out his priorities in a speech yesterday. his remarks are next on c-span. on this morning's "washington journal," we'll discuss our report this week by the federal reserve on the net wealth of u.s. families. we'll also look at the changing demographics of u.s. cities. "washington journal" each morning at 7:00 eastern. mitt romney kicks off the campaign bus tour today in new hampshire. he's calling it the believe in america, every town counts press tour, which will also travel through pennsylvania, ohio, wisconsin, iowa, and michigan. our live coverage starts at 11:00 a.m.

james watt. i never met mr. watt and will never forget he called me during the '70s from the mountain states legal foundation and said, i'm james watt, i'm a constituent and i would like for you to get me some feminists who are against the equal rights amendment. now, i said, okay, which one of my crazy friends is trying to crank me up. he didn't think that was funny at all because it was james watt and not a friend. so nevertheless, we were never too close. but you know what happened, he got promoted to be department of interior and did wonderful things like turn the buffalo around on the seal so it was facing to the right and not the left, important things, refused to take private land donated for conservation purposes. and the great thing, he didn't allow the beach boys to appear on the mall in 1983, instead we had wayne newton. which even aggravated nancy reagan. she liked the beach boys. well, he didn't last long and he went on but i understand not long ago he gave a speech -- i guess it was in the 90s, gave

mrs. mcdonald in her car with their 1-year-old son, james, dr. mach donald in his son right behind them. mcdonald their son had become almost completely unresponsive. she pulled over to the side of the road not far from their waldorf home, and just before her husband pulled up started giving her son cpr. >> i tried to blow in his mouth and see if he start to breathe again. >> reporter: it turns out james had a seizure brought on by a high fever. >> probably the most terrified i've been as a parent or as a physician. >> reporter: a situation made worst by the scorching temperatures outside. according to james' father, the chairman of emergency services at southern maryland hospital center, knows a thing or two about medical emergencies. >> i've been an e.r. doc since 2007. >> reporter: once he was cooled off and after a brief stay at the hospital little james was sent home. >> he did go home that night. >> reporter: the parents are still breathing a huge sigh of relief, keeping their son extremely close. >> that's something i don't want to relive again any time soon. >> reporter: matt jab

mr. lebron james. >> i am surprised in these playoffs, some of the games are not close at all. >> lebronlast night. >> did he? >> i cannot stand the guy. i think everything that's wrong with sports, you can see in lebron james. >> i know he is on your hate list. >> that's impressive. he is this generation's jordan. >> he is indeed. and, you know, he has given us a lot of reasons not to like him. >> that's right. >> and a lot of reasons to love him. >> what a show we have coming up to you for you. we are going to talk pot. we are going to talk pets. we are going to talk periolo from the sent of american progress on the latest on pot and pets. wait until you hear. and, yes, i am still big pilloried over "the star-spang he will star-spangled banner." >> in eng lir. >> i can do this in english. a lot of people are wondering if anthony boreurdain is selling out. the t.v. hosts a new reality cooking show with british food with migelit lawson. if you go to abc's website and look at the casting calls, it makes it sound a lot like any other cooking competition that happens to be on t.v. >> cnn an

mrs. mar -- their family was shaped by her, and professor james hibayashi. he will leave a great legacy. i will join in the comments that supervisor campos made about the conversation at the land use committee. for those who didn't watch it, it is worth spending time. i am troubled there were representations made around finances that changed. i was troubled that we will not be allowed to review financial information. we have to vote on a development agreement. cpmc could escape obligtions based on these projections. i know this conversation will be ongoing. this is a topic we should be focused on. i do have one legislative item. i have had my staff -- we have done work on how our buildings in san francisco can be made more green. we used a large amount of the city's energy. i turned this legislation to help establish a program to encourage building owners to recycle water and i want to thank the staff were not only helping with the legislation from that we, but the legislation i am introducing today, concerning the topic of plastic water bottles. we all know the impact on the globe and i

james madison's mount pentpe. in 1910 this railroad belongs to southern rail. and mr. dupont who is the owner of montpellier at the time wanted the train to stop for him. in order to have that happen he needed to build a train station. he did. come on inside i will show it to you. the history at montpellier is interesting in the dupont era. because of course the duponts were not a southern family. the duponts, especially william and annie dupont had actually lived in europe for a number of years before coming back to america where they chose to settle out here in western virginia. so they were coming into a different social atmosphere than what they were accustomed to either in delaware where the family was or, or in europe certainly. and, in the south, things were segregated. they were in the north as well. but not to the same extent. certainly they were not in europe. but because he was living in the south, he had to abide by social customs here, with the segregated set of waiting rooms, for the people who worked on his esta estate, there were segregated kitchens and

mrs. mar -- their family was shaped by her, and professor james hibayashi. he will leave a great legacy. i will join in the comments that supervisor campos made about the conversation at the land use committee. for those who didn't watch it, it is worth spending time. i am troubled there were representations made around finances that changed. i was troubled that we will not be allowed to review financial information. we have to vote on a development agreement. cpmc could escape obligtions based on these projections. i know this conversation will be ongoing. this is a topic we should be focused on. i do have one

mr. attorney general, james cole, deputy attorney general has written that the department has a greater obligation than just check the legal sufficiency and approving wiretap application. he thinks that applications also have to apply with doj policy, is that correct? >> applications have to agree with doj policy? >> that's what he said. >> sure. >> okay. during a transcribed interview deputy assistant attorney then jason weinstein testified that senior officials approving the wiretap applications do not read the wiretap applications. is this practice acceptable to you? >> they read summaries he of the applications, that is a process that has been used by this administration and by all previous administrations. it is the way in which the office of enforcement -- >> are you aware that a -- >> can i answer my question? the question you've asked me. >> you've given me a sufficient answer considering the amount of questions and the amount of time i've had. you're okay with that practice, you've already answered that. would you agree that senior officials are responsible for documents they sign? i woul