mr. kelley during our meeting and item 21, it talks about the language of mutual respect. and the second paragraph says that the sfpd's rules of conduct in parenthesis, 2.01 section 14, and is attached here too, demands that members of sfpd treats all people with respect and that sfpd will take the action to reduce the inappropriate language to students or the school staff. such rules of conduct apply at all times including during an arrest or investigation. so i just pointed that out to mr. kelley but i also want to comment it out since he commented publicly to the broader listening audience and that is my expectation that they will follow the rules of conduct regarding a level of respect from the students and school staff. >> thank you. >> commissioner wynns? >> thank you. >> i talked to mr. true man about this before, and i just want to for the record talk a little bit about the did was about the arrests on the school campuses which is section 16 and according to mr. which is undoubtly true it has not changed from the earlier mlus and so i am doing this only for the rec

mr. kelley? >> sorry, there are more people lined up back here. >> briefly, we are at our five minutes. >> i want to remind you that under the terms of the contract we get to speak on anything any way even though it is outside of the five minutes. go ahead. >> i am previously referred to as mr. heely which i am glad to accept that, and they support the elimination of the willful defiance as the suspension from school and willful defiance is the interaction in the classroom that displaced a student and a teacher at odds, the school then should have a system to subsequently deal with the situation so that the behavior correction can be made, and the student can continue in a learning environment, we thank you for bringing it forward we think that this is a wise step and we are supportive of it. susan, usef executive vice president, ditto, we as educators do not see suspension and expulsion for disruption as a educational strategy and it is very helpful that the resolution includes language about gi

mr. dennis kelley. >> thank you very much. and congratulations on, as supervisor mar said maintaining the richmond district hold on the presidency and i thought that it was very brave of commissioner murase not to point out that the sunset district cut into half of the leadership. and i actually put in a card to say that i would speak on this if carm elo was in trouble and the fact that you called me makes me presume that he is in trouble. no i am just... >> no. >> i am teasing you. this is the calendar that we sat down together and we came out with, and we understand that there was concern about the thanksgiving holiday and we are committed to going back and looking at that again for this year. for the coming year. thank you mr. kelley. >> comments from the board or the superintendent? >> commissioner murase? >> yes, i know that historically we have gone to the part advisory committee could you tell us a little bit about who the others have seen? >> yes. the group that was involved with this from the parents' side was the pac

mr. kelley. >> council, if any commissioner would like to pull that item for discussion. are we able to do it at that time, considering that we have already gone through that process, and i forgot to have him speak? >> excuse me madam president, prior to the vote, and an item may be pulled, for either discussion, or it could be put over to the subsequent meeting, discussed there as a hold over item and then brought back up for a vote. >> okay. >> yes, so considering that actually, i have questions and i think that we do not have the staff here to answer some of those questions. so, i think that we should remove that item. if you think time wise we could do it for the next meeting, deputy superintendent? maybe i could get your opinion on that? >> i am not aware of any deadlines, that would need us to access like this, and certainly there are some questions that could or we could have the staff come back and make sure that respond to. >> that would be great, and so have you noted some of the questions that president kelley has brought forth? >> yes. >> okay. >> so i think t

mr. kelley said or to that matter to our students, it will be by chance, and an extremely small number, that does not mean that i don't believe that the housing is a necessity in the school district but i think that the future of our school district is depending on addressing the issue that the employees can't afford to live here and i just, whatever our good intentions, including mine, for decades, made, no advances, in that area. and we must do that. so, i want to thank everyone for all of the hard work that you have done on this, and as i said, i think that we have no other choice, but, and i am glad that you know, our drop in the bucket will be a drop in the bucket of the necessity for more affordable housing in san francisco. but i am looking for better results for us and our goals in the future. thank you. >> dr. murase? >> i want to acknowledge the work of my colleagues, fewer and mendoza who have been really spear heading this effort. i also want to acknowledge lee and golden and his tireless work on this and i am very pleased at least in an early estimate was that this proposal coul

mr. kelley. it's a good field to be in for many types of jobs but the technology jobs are beginning to move ahead. software developer, everything you have has software in it. mobile phones require a new wave of development. they're going through the roof. they're high paying jobs, $90,000 median salary and not -- as you go down the list there are data jobs. >> how do you go about making list? >> we look at ten different factors. we're studying the government data, how many of these jobs will there be ten years from now, how many jobs are open now, what's the employment rate for those jobs. >> does happiness matter? >> it does. we do crank in work/life/balance and stress with some of these jobs. they look great on paper, but you earn the money. >> it's a blend. it's a mix. we try to give you a top ten, top 100. it's always important what's the best job for you. >> dentists were one of the top, and i'm -- i'm not surprised to hear that. >> one of the -- >> it's not a profession that interests you.

mr. kelley, a political article yesterday referred to your group as the advanced guard of a plant abatement effort by the of on thestabright to push back on the establishment efforts to minimize the advice of issues like t abortion rights and gay marriage. yo that that you would define your group? >> guest: no. that wouldn'tur be my self-definition. there are two aspects to but we do. we certainly do defend the social issues within politics,mf and think that it's both right for the country and a political winner. but we also handle economic issues. we tried to push for an economics that is more centered running for working families and working people rather than just on the business class and large corporations. >> host: where does your group and social conservative right now fit into theic republican party? a different political article about your group noted that social conservatives have been n largely relegated to the sidelines as the business wing of the gop establishment, wages a bitter and expensive struggle against the tea party for the soul of the republican party. >> guest: let's

mr. kelley, she needs a saint's name. and daddy said, she's pretty kitty kelley. said there is no saint pretty. [laughter] my father said, all right, legally she will be known as katherine. and so the first thing i learned when i went to catholic school was about saint katherine. and i learned -- to this day i can tell you st. katherine, st. katherine, please come to my aid, pray that i may never die an old maid. a rich one, st. katherine, a poor one, st. katherine, but anyone better than no one, st. katherine. >> she was the patron saint of spinsters, old maids and -- >> host: is that a true prayer that you just told? >> guest: you don't think i made this up on the spot? [laughter] yes, it is a true prayer. and i learned it and had to learn it so often that i can still remember it. >> host: two questions for kit ty kelly -- kitty kelley, this was from robin heidi in palm springs. have you uncovered things about subjects that were too violative to reveal in print? >> guest: yes. i haven't, i haven't uncovered them in the terms of absolutely documenting them. but i

mr. baitman. >> kitty kelley why he decided not to sign the ato? >> no, he did not. >> did you brief administrator tavenner on the security risk in the federal exchange? >> no, i did not. >> the gentleman's time has expired. >> you may answer. >> no, sir. i never briefed -- >> could you repeat the question? >> did you counsel with ms. tavenner on security issues state was no, i did not. >> the gentleman for massachusetts is recognized. >> thank all the witnesses for working, for being here today. essentially what we've established is whether memorandum that allows the majority of early to raise the specter of problems only to find out it was never sent to anyone because those issues have been addressed and dealt with and now we have a system that is not had any successful attack, hack attack since then but we continue to go over and over and over this because if we do go over and over maybe somebody will think there is a real problem. but let's talk about the real problem. we spent time doing that on this committee, oversight committee, ma hearings

mr. carl malamud, the director of -- strike that. directs the nonprofit to work on public demesne -- domain information. he received his to grieve from the kelley school of business. mr.first witness will be nimmer. it is good to have you all with us. lady and gentlemen, if you could confine your statements to on or about five minutes. there is a panel on your desk where the green light turns to amber. the clock begins ticking. willfive minute counter appear and then the red light illuminates. we try to apply the five-minute rule to ourselves as well, so if earring -- during questioning if you could be as terse as possible, that would be appreciated. mr. nimmer, if you could kick the ball, and we are pleased to have you with us. >> think you, mr. chairman. and thank you to all members of the committee for the opportunity to testify this we address the rights of copyright owners. one of those rights is distribution. specifically, does the act of placing a digital file containing a copyrighted file in a file shuddering folder on the internet violate copyright law? only if they can prove that a third party the file? in short, the distribution righ