mr. king: mr. chairman, i'd yield myself 30 seconds. and it's a little bit amazing to me the gentlelady can get so focused on this. i'm the one that should be focused in it in that way and animated. the taxpayers should be animated at this. they should understand that when the federal government sets union scale and drives the price up and the taxpayers can't afford it, it's not about a race to the bottom. the quality of work for my workers was always there. we take care of our people 12 months out of the year with a benefits package. we're not hiring them out of the union hall for a day but you make us pay the prices as if we were. we uphold our workers and take care of them. we have the quality that's there. it's a matter of fact and proven, mr. chairman. the chair: the gentlelady from connecticut. ms. delauro: i yield two minutes to the gentlewoman from hawaii, ms. hirono. the chair: the gentlelady is recognized for two minutes. ms. hirono: mr. speaker, i rise to speak against this amendment. th

mr. kingston: i thank the gentleman for yielding and i stand in strong support of the rehberg amendment. and i do so because this health care, this very controversial bill which was passed through strong arm tactics last year during a time period when the american public was crying out against it, this was a product of the backroom deal making in washington, d.c. this is one reason why the democrats lost control of the u.s. congress. it wasn't so much the bill, it was the process. but let's talk about the bill. an individual mandate that's already been ruled unconstitutional by two judges, a mandate which the governor of alaska is saying he's not even going to implement the rule, this is hardly a law that's bringing america together. this bill needs to be put on the back burner and let us retool it and rework it and i believe that's what the americans want us to do. it destroys the doctor-patient relationship. one thing that's clear is that people do not want the insurance companies telling th

mr. king: mr. chairman. the chair: for what purpose does the gentleman from iowa rise? mr. king: i have an amendment at the desk, number 266. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 266 printed in the congressional record offered by mr. king of iowa. the chair: the gentlelady from connecticut. ms. delauro: i reserve a point of order. the chair: the gentlelady reserves a point of order. pursuant to the order of the house of february 17, 2011, the gentleman from iowa, mr. king, and a member opposed will each control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from iowa. mr. king: thank you, mr. chairman. amendment 266 is the amendment that has had a lot of discussion around this chamber and around this country and what it does is it recognizes the results of this c.r.s. report, mr. chairman. this report dated just last thursday, february 10, 2011. it took a long time to put all the numbers together in an official document that identified the money that

thank you, mr. king, for coming. i want to echo the comments made by the chairman and mr. sessions in terms of our feeling like we are with you on this obviously, since every single one of us voted to repeal obamacare, but you pointed out something that needs to be mentioned. we voted to repeal -- well, i think that probably the reason that this is hr-1, because we knew we were going to be facing the continuing resolution. we knew that we were going to have to continue the funding for the federal government. and obamacare was number two and appropriate to vote on it immediately and i don't have a problem with that at all, but we know what happened with the bill when it went over to the senate. at first, mr. reaid said no vot on it and then a dust-up in egypt and he had a good cover when people were paying attention to other things, and he simply brought it up for a vote, and of course, the the vote fail. now we have been accused over and over again of wanting to shut down the federal government, and we have said over and over again, that is not our intentions. we want to g

mr. kings spon -- mr. kingston: yesterday we got the president's budget. it was more of the same. higher taxes, more spending, more deficits. it would give us the third year of trillion-dollar deficits and made no mention of entitlement reform they feel president ignored the recommendations of his very own hand-picked deficit reduction committee. i was very disappointed. at the same time, i want to work with the president. where he wans to cey money and reduce spending, i think it's important for republicans to reach out and say yes. it sounds to me like the democrats want to remove thems from that process. which is interesting, because what we are debating in this $100 billion spending reduction bill is an open rule process where democrats can put amendments on the board. and if they do agree with us, as i'm sure they do, that for every $1 we spend, 40 cents is borrowed, that our national

what keeps me going and i have fought for mar mr. king, i helped to build it, i sit down and the streets when the police would be us, they did not want us to have this. i fought so hard and i saw many things. one thing that i will live to see and i am proud, i am worried about the future for the people. i hope that all of you take this in consideration, makes them proud, stopped them trying to kill each other. if you can be anything in your dreams can come true. that is all i wanted to say. thank you. [applause] >> to all of the supervisors that are present here today, i truly want to say a thank-you for the invitation of granting us the privilege of being here as african americans, leaders in this community. i want to began, i myself being a young african-american female student in their rural south, 8 years old, not really knowing what prejudice was all about. but being able to understand when the late start your martin luther king gave me the great opportunity to be able to stand here today as one of the individuals that spoke before m

mr. king: h.r. 1 cuts the funding, h.r. 2 repeals. thank you, mr. chairman, and i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentlelady from connecticut. ms. delauro: let me just reiterate again this amendment would not create jobs, it would not do anything to reduce the deficit. in fact, by the c.b.o. numbers it would increase net budget authority in the bill by $2 billion next year. a total of $5.5 billion over the next several years. it increases the deficit. let's keep hitting it on that point, mr. levin of michigan is recognized for two minutes. the chair: without objection, unanimous consent is granted and the gentleman from michigan is recognized for two minutes. mr. levin: if this amendment would become part of the c.r. there will be no c.r. and that will be your responsibility. your responsibility. this is an effort to repeal by paralysis, paralyzing the provisions that have gone into effect, pre-existing conditions for children being covered, children under 26 having the ability to get insurance. it

thank you, mr. king, for coming. i want to echo the comments made by the chairman and mr. sessions in terms of our feeling like we are with you on this obviously, since every single one of us voted to repeal obamacare, but you pointed out something that needs to be mentioned. we voted to repeal -- well, i think that probably the reason that this is hr-1, because we knew we were going to be facing the continuing resolution. we knew that we were going to have to continue the funding for the federal government. and obamacare was number two and appropriate to vote on it immediately and i don't have a problem with that at all, but we know what happened with the bill when it went over to the senate. at first, mr. reaid said no vot on it and then a dust-up in egypt and he had a good cover when people were paying attention to other things, and he simply brought it up for a vote, and of course, the the vote fail. now we have been accused over and over again of wanting to shut down the federal government, and we have said over and over again, that is not our intentions. we want to g

. >> mr. king of new york. >> thank you, mr. chairman. director panetta, he said there was no involvement with the muslim brotherhood in this country? >> my understanding of the question was does the administration in the united states have a relationship with the muslim brotherhood, to which i believe the answer is no. >> that also applies to the fbi obviously. >> yes. as i believe you are aware, we do not have a relationship with them. we continue to have issues with them. we do not have a formal relationship with them at this time. >> if you have an informal relationship with them? >> no, but there are occasions when individuals who may be loosely affiliated with care that we have relationships with. we have no formal relationship, but there are a number of fluid organizaons, depending on where you are in the country. on some occasions we may be with persons to have ongoing issues with care. >> a you concerned at what is happening in egypt could spread throughout the region? does that include morocco? >> i think there are a number of c

he approached mr. king, not the bag of chips out of his hand, and proceeded to search him. king reacted, was tased, had the sincere of him before he fled to save his life, and was executed. this man is still on the police force in oakland. he has pulled a gun on a comrade of mine, saying, "i have killed two people. you know what will happen if you run." ever since judge perry issued his decision in november, sentencing with a slap on the wrist, thereby creating a "i thought i used my taser" defense, there have been killings in oakland of unarmed young men, who are claimed to have been going for the waistband, for what the officer thought was a weapon, in one case an electronic scale while the victim was jumping over a fence. whatever tools we give officers, a very certain percentage of people in our communities know the officers will abuse. [applause] >> hello, commissioners. my name is marlin crump. i am the co-founder of the revolutionary legal advocacy corps. when they had the theater performance of a 911 domestic call, when the police officer came here with a tommy gun d

mr. king of new york. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new york is recognized for three minutes. mr. king: madam speaker, i thank the gentleman for yielding and i rise in opposition to this legislation and i say that as one who has voted continually for reform at the u.n., has been critical of funding procedures involving the u.n. but i'm here today to save lives. the fact, is contrary to what's been said, i don't want to be caught in a fight between democrats and republicans, between the obama administration, the state department, the u.n., between chairmen and ranking members, i am here because of the fact that this is not something that started three months ago or four months ago or five months ago. this has been an ongoing matter between the new york city police department and the u.n. and the state department. the results of an attack in this area would be catastrophic. i'm not going to go into details. anyone who wants to check, the series of correspondents going back long bef

amendment 89, mr. king of wisconsin. amendment 88, mr. king of wisconsin. amendment 104, mrs. blackburn of tennessee. the unfinished business is the request for a recorded vote on amendment number 50 printed in the congressional record offered by ms. mccollum on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes prevailed by voice vote. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 50 printed in the congressional record offered by ms. mccollum of minnesota. the chair: a recorded vote has been requested. those in support of the request for a recorded vote will rise and be counted. a sufficient number having arisen, a recorded vote is ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. this will be a 15-minute vote followed by a series of two-minute votes. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of

. >> mr. king of new york. >> thank you, mr. chairman. director panetta, he said there was no involvement with the muslim brotherhood in this country? >> my understanding of the question was does the administration in the united states have a relationship with the muslim brotherhood, to which i believe the answer is no. >> that also applies to the fbi obviously. >> yes. as i believe you are aware, we do not have a relationship with them. we continue to have issues with them. we do not have a formal relationship with them at this time. >> if you have an informal relationship with them? >> no, but there are occasions when individuals who may be loosely affiliated with care that we have relationships with. we have no formal relationship, but there are a number of fluid organizations, depending on where you are in the country. on some occasions we may be with persons to have ongoing issues with care. >> are you concerned at what is happening in egypt could spread throughout the region? does that include morocco? >> i think there are a number

mr. king: h.r. 1 cuts the funding, h.r. 2 repeals. thank you, mr. chairman, and i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentlelady from connecticut. ms. delauro: let me just reiterate again this amendment would not create jobs, it would not do anything to reduce the deficit. in fact, by the c.b.o. numbers it would increase net budget authority in the bill by $2 billion next year. a total of $5.5 billion over the next several years. it increases the deficit. let's keep hitting it on that point, mr. levin of michigan is recognized for two minutes. the chair: without objection, unanimous consent is granted and the gentleman from michigan is recognized for two minutes. mr. levin: if this amendment would become part of the c.r. there will be no c.r. and that will be your responsibility. your responsibility. this is an effort to repeal by paralysis, paralyzing the provisions that have gone into effect, pre-existing conditions for children being covered, children under 26 having the ability to get insurance. it

. >> mr. king of new york. >> thank you, mr. chairman. director panetta, he said there was no involvement with the muslim brotherhood in this country? >> my understanding of the question was does the administration in the united states have a relationship with the muslim brotherhood, to which i believe the answer is no. >> that also applies to the fbi obviously. >> yes. as i believe you are aware, we do not have a relationship with them. we continue to have issues with them. we do not have a formal relationship with them at this time. >> if you have an informal relationship with them? >> no, but there are occasions when individuals who may be loosely affiliated with care that we have relationships with. we have no formal relationship, but there are a number of fluid organizations, depending on where you are in the country. on some occasions we may be with persons to have ongoing issues with care. >> are you concerned at what is happening in egypt could spread throughout the region? does that include morocco? >> i think there are a number

mr. king: all of those who have spoken on this issue, i recall back here on this floor in the early part when the mexico city vote came up and i remember that debate here on this floor. i remember watching the vote go up on the board, the language that would compel american taxpayers to fund abortion in foreign lands. first time in years, democrats lost the debate, but won the vote. and i saw members over on this side of the floor jumping up and down, cheering, cheering, what? because you had taken a step to compel americans to fund abortions in foreign lands. how can anyone cheer something like that. what was the moral standard that brought about such elation. it is confusion for me to think that we can't even describe what this is. i brought some possible ters to the floor of the house judiciary last week which showed what evacuation is. i don't know if there is anybody in this chamber could witness a abortion and lend their hand to such a thing. i remember buying the movie "silent scream" a

mr. steve king from iowa. mr. king: thank you, mr. speaker, i thank the gentleman from georgia and i'm proud to welcome him to the united states congress, he knows a little bit about this organism we live and breathe in. i come to raise a subject i think needs to be brought before the congress, mr. speaker. even though this house, in h r. 2, the second priority of the speaker, voted to repeal obamacare and sent that bill to the senate where it was taken up and every republican voted to repeal obamacare, so every republican in all the united states congress has voted to repeal obamacare, it was bipartisan in this house by the former speaker's definition and even though that took place, we did not shut off the funding to obamacare because in a, i will say a legislative slight of hand, there was written in the obamacare bill automatic appropriations that just last week we were able to pull all those pieces out and add them up and received a c.r.s. report last friday that shows that $105.5 billion are automatically triggered for spending

mr. jones? yes. i'm dora amc donald, and you know, dr. king his visit with you and mrs. jones, but he forgot to tell you that he wanted you to come as his guest. he's preaching in las -- los angeles on sunday. my wife was standing there, and i told her what had been said. she turned against me again early in the morning. she says you may not be going to alabama, but you're going to that church. i said, well the invitation is for both of us. he's eight and a half -- she's eight and a half months pregnant so i just go to this church. this is 1960. baldwin hills, as you know or assume you know, it's like in california was the community of southern california. before successful blacks could move to bel-aire, you know, this is where everybody lived if you had any money. i go to the church. reverend hb charles. i had heard about the church. you know, minimum of 1500 or more, minimum of 1500 people. a large church. dr. king is introduced as guest preacher, and then he gets up, and he says, ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters, the text of my sermon today is the role and r

thompson and mr. king and the other new yorkers who will speak on this will go into more detail on, that's a host country obligation. there is not $180 million in that fund has been committed to the request of the new york police department to secure the perimeter of the u.n. building where the f.d.r. drive goes under the u.n. secondly, it puts us back in arrears at the u.n. we tried that once. that doesn't get our agenda through. we have a big agenda and bigger form agenda at the u.n. failing to pay our obligations is not the answer. and because of the nature of this fund and the commitments already made, i repeat what the c.b.o. says. h.r. 519, this legislation, would have no effect on the federal budget. so we are not saving money, we are skirting the important security requests, and we are going back into a pattern of arrearages that undermines our efforts at the u.n. and does not help to achieve those goals. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves the balance

king. mr. farley. >> may it please the court, the issue for you today of whether or not police can create exit and circumstances arises from the improper suppression of reasonably seized evidence after a reasonable warrantless entry. the tasks set forth by the kentucky supreme court is improper for several reasons. the first of which is this court has routinely held that the intent of police officers one affecting a warrantless entry is irrelevant. >> where does the supreme court say that it was looking to a subjective state of mind on the part of a police? >> the supreme court's first test is in our petition on page 26 -- [-- i am sorry. discussion starts on page 44 a and carries over to 46 day. first question of their test is whether or not officers made an attempt to purposely e. vega work requirements. >> that didn't apply in this case. >> that is correct. the second prong of the test is whether or not the actions of the respondents in this case would have been foreseeable by the police off

. >> thank you, mr. king. >> thank you, mr. chairman, i want to thank the panel for the testimony here today and just let me thank you all for your work you're doing in your respective roles to keep the nation safe. i'm very pleased that we've had a pretty robust discussion here this morning about -- about cybersecurity and the vulnerabilities that we face. i spent a lot of time as some of you know on the cyberissue. and clearly i think we have a great deal of work yet to do. director clapper, i guess i'll start with you and perhaps director mueller can comment as well. how do you assess the progress that we made in dealing with the cyberthreat overall i know we had success and standing up cybercommand and also deploying our perimeter defenses especially with respect to protecting the network and we're working on deploying the ensign 3 on the dot gov network but clearly not enough has been done to protect critical infrastructure which for better or worse is -- much of it is in private hands. i want to know basically at this poi

mrs. cooper says even the shopping center king sometimes gets stressed. that was particularly true during the i.p.o. period, which she remembers as a rough time. >> he's a big worrier. he worries a lot, he really does. sometimes, he shows it; sometimes, he doesn't, but he does worry. and i'm sure it was a hard time. he didn't know how it was going to come out. >> susie: and then there are cooper's four sons-- two are doctors, one works in hollywood in the film business, and only the youngest is in real estate. three of them sat down with me and talked about their father's best qualities. >> a brilliant businessman. >> decent. >> kindest. >> sweet. >> man of his word. >> funny. >> kindest man you'd ever meet. >> funny, funny. he just knows when to interject humor. it's just... whether it's to break the ice or to just endear himself, or just make you feel more comfortable. >> he enjoys his work. he enjoys people. he enjoys his free time. so, he's really, you know, a complete man. >> and he taught us your word is your bond. david mentioned that, and really..

i am proud to welcome to the show right now, the king of ripped himself, mr. tony horton. >> mark, my pleasure. how are you, my man? >> i am well. i want to show you something because the proof is always in the pudding. here's a photograph of me before i started this program. here is me just six weeks after, and today, as i stand here on this stage with you, i am now 25 pounds lighter and i am five inches smaller through the waist... >> wow. >> it's just an amazing program and i am such a believer. >> well, you know, the beautiful thing about 10 minute trainer is, like you said, you don't have time for p90x, but with 10 minute trainer you've got no more excuses, right? i know you've got a busy schedule, you travel the globe, you know, and you've got a family and a couple of kids. the key is finding that time. with 10 minute trainer you can make the time, and 10 minutes is just enough time to get the kind of results that you've gotten. there are no more excuses. >> i know, we find so many reasons not to find a way to work out and we make these excuses, but this

i'm arnold king, mr. greenspan, how are you doing? yes, sir, my queion is about the receipts. how did they play a role in deconstructing the u.s. market? the balance sheet had caused a fall in the housing prices. >> i don't quite get the question. which balance sheet are you referring to? >> how did balance sheet play a role? >> company balance sheets or household balance sheets? >> very much so. indeed, another way of looking at the equity extraction issue is to recognize that that is the far most important determinant of what the asset side of the equities are in the household balance sheet. so what we were beginning to see all through the period of the boom was a very dramatic rise in the market value of real estate matched only in party a rise in the liabilities. the effect was to very significantly augment the equity that the personal sector, meaning households or nonprofit organizati organizations and in some calculations, noncorporate business. there was this big surge going up on the asset side. and almost comparable surge on the liability side, and it went into full r

mr. obama spoke with british prime minister david cameron, king abdullah of jordan, and the prime minister of turkey, emphasizing that democracy will bring more, not less, stability to the region. >>> and this country's top military officer left for the middle east today. admiral mike mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs, will meet with jordan's king abdullah and prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel to reassure them of u.s. support. >>> and a program note. david gregory will have much more on the revolution in egypt tomorrow on "meet the press," and as congress prepares to take on major legislation, a sunday exclusive with house speaker john boehner. that's tomorrow morning here on nbc. >>> when "nightly news" continues this saturday evening, a deadly explosion raises new questions about the safety of america's gas pipelines. we'll be right back. >>> there are new questions about the safety of this country's gas pipelines, millions of miles of them, after a series of explosions this week, including one in pennsylvania that left five people dead. nbc's tom costello has more tonight.

award -- here to present this year's award, please welcome to the stage door and martin luther king jr., mrs. i'm drinking, and we're going to present this to ms. victoria reggie kennedy. and of course, the pastor andrew young. give a big round of applause, will you? >> let me take the microphone. morehouse college would not have the medical school if senator kennedy had not deftly crafted this one-sentence amendment that put $10 million up to create a medical school. it was defined in such a way that it could only go to more house. we want to thank him for that. >> well. thank you. to martin luther king iii, to elder bernice king, to andrea king, to ambassador andrew young, to all of you, thank you on behalf of teddy, thank you on behalf of our family, thank you from the bottom of my heart. i am deeply moved. and to been in cherry, congratulations on this -- ben and jerry, congratulations on this well deserved recognition. on behalf of teddy, thank you. i also want to say to all of the house does here -- alphas here, that i have just for you this evening. [applause] thank you. thank you. i

king lab that he would be mr. green.e would say no, about one of the hotels, some think that i got from body language but the way she said it i believe to. when she wasn't looking i stopped 92 and looking up the corridor source fortunately it was a long hotel and it was just one line. >> you could prompt the elevator to see if there was any activity with his lieutenants. i get to the seventh floor and i see all of the black men and so i start heading that way and they sit down lady? i said i want to get an interview. sure. no problem. [laughter] they said it dr. king is not giving any interviews price that i am here why is a coming to chicago? >> he is having a press conference 10:00 in the morning and you will find out along with everybody else. >> that did not make me happy so i decided i would stay by the elevator and he would have to get past me whenever he went anywhere. i could get to him but if not for the palace guard i may be able to get through to him. i had newspapers, i got a diet coke and it was probably tab

king. i'm sure he would have been mr.omething like that. >> host: yang. >> guest: and so all of these people were saying, no, he's not registered. one of the hotels that i went in, there was something i got from body language. you learn as a reporter to pick up on that. it was just the way she said it that i believed, i bet he's here. i know he's year. so when she wasn't looking i went out the elevator. i stopped on to, i stopped on three, i stopped on for. i was looking up and down the corridors looking for any activity. fortunately it was of on hotel that did not have other corridors. it was just one line. you could look off the elevator and see if there was any activity. i knew he would be traveling with his lieutenants. and so i get to the seventh floor and a sea of these black men at the end of the hall i am going, i start heading that way. asked at to one of the gentlemen, young lady. i said, i want to get an interview with dr. king. [laughter] >> host: sure, no problem. >> guest: come this way. he said, no, dr. kin

i'm arnold king, mr. greenspan, how are you doing? yes, sir, my question is about the receipts. how did they play a role in deconstructing the u.s. market? the balance sheetad caused a fall in the housing prices. >> i don't quite get the question. which balance sheet are you referring to? >> how did balance sheet play a role? >> company balance sheets or household balance sheets? >> very much . indeed, another way of looking at the equity extraction issue is to recognize that that is the far most important determinant of what t asset side of the equities are in the household balance sheet. so what we were beginning to see all through the period of the boom was a very dramatic rise in the market value of real estate matched only in part by a rise the liabilities. the effect was to very significantly augment the equity that the personal sector, meaning households or nonprofit organizati organizations and in some calculations, noncorporate busiss. there was this big surge going up on the asset side. and almost comparable surge on thliability side, and it went into full reverse on t

king. i'm sure he would have been mr. green or something like that.e people were saying no, he's not registered here. but one of the hotels that i went in there was something i got from body language, you know, you learn as a reporter to pick up on that, and it was just the way she said it that i believed she's here, i know he's here. so when she wasn't looking, i went up the elevator and buy stock on to, three, four, i was looking up and down the corridors, looking for any activity. fortunately it salaam hotel that didn't have other quarters, it was just long. so you could look off the elevator and see if there's any activity and i know he would be traveling with his lieutenants, and so i get to the seventh floor and i see all these black men at the end of the hall, and i'm going -- so i start heading that way, and i said to one of the gentleman who was like young leedy -- i said i want to get an interview with dr. king. [laughter] >> host: sure, no problem. i'm sure that was the response. >> guest: of course. she said no, dr. king is not giving any

tunnel between fourth and king does not have funding and until we heard this, did not seem to have a viable way to complete the funding. this could provide the opportunity. >> mr. elsbernd has a question. >> i don't know how the administration intends to make this happen. the main issue is the funding source. you know this better than anybody. it takes more than advocacy. without a champion in the administration, it would never happen. like the california lottery. the chances of winning are the same, but to win, you have to play. i will be the last person to criticize the administration. this is what we need. a visionerary push from the president and vice president. it may be considered seriously. it it arrives as proposed, it is part of the game. but what a contrast. that is a big step at the federal level. we know parts of the a dvocacy program will be to make sure we show a set of projects ready to go in the bay area, to try to put the best face we can on the conflicts and issues about that, but make a clear link between high-speed rail and the caltrains service, for capital improvement. and finally, that we show a common front on california, those looking

king george vi's widow, the queen mother. so he wrote her at clarence house and got back this astonishing answer. >> please, mr. seidler, not in my lifetime. the memory of these events is still too painful. when the queen mother says to an englishman you wait, you wait. >> reporter: 28 years passed before the queen mother died at the age of 101. seidler had kept his word and could now finally write the script he wanted to write all his life. >> i had to do a great deal of thinking about it a lot of remembering it, a lot of the pain came back. >> reporter: but it was worth it. at the age of 73, seidler is now the talk of hollywood. he has either won or been nominated for every screenwriting award out there. >> thank you. >> reporter: and tonight, he waits to see if oscar will smile on him, too. >> to be heard, at last, to have a voice, is a very marvelous thing. >> reporter: a young boy and a british monarch, joined by words that neither could get out, at first. lee cowan, nbc news, hollywood. >>> before we leave you here, we have this program note. tomorrow morning, the day after hollywood's big night, an exclu

i'm arnold king, mr. greenspan, how are you doing? yes, sir, my question is about the receipts. how did they play a role in deconstructing the u.s. market? the balance sheet had caused a fall in the housing prices. >> i don't quite get the question. which balance sheet are you referring to? >> how did balance sheet play a role? >> company balance sheets or household balance sheets? >> very much so. indeed, another way of looking at the equity extraction issue is to recognize that that is the far most important determinant of what the asset side of the equities are in the household balance sheet. so what we were beginning to see all through the period of the boom was a very dramatic rise in the market value of real estate matched only in part by a rise in the liabilities. the effect was to very significantly augment the equity that the personal sector, meaning households or nonprofit organizati organizations and in some calculations, noncorporate business. there was this big surge going up on the asset side. and almost comparable surge on the liability side, and it went into full

king. i am sure he would have would have been mr. green or something like that.so all of these people were saying no, he is not registered here. but one of the hotels that i went and, there was something i got from body language. you know, you learn as a reporter to pick up on that. it was just the way she said it that i leads, i know he is here. so when she wasn't looking, i went up the elevator. i stopped on two, i stopped on three, i stopped on four. i was looking up and down the corridors looking for any activity. fortunately it was a long hotel that didn't have other corridors. it was just one, so you could look off the elevator and see if there was any activity. and they knew he would be traveling with his lieutenants. so i get to the seventh floor, and i see all these black men at the end of the hall. so i start heading that way, and i said to one of the gentlemen. he said young lady? i said i want to get an interview with dr. king. [laughter] >> host: sure, no problem. >> guest: he said, no dr. king is not giving any interviews. and i said, but i'm here t