mr. lindsey mentioned has a bay and the second story up would accommodate a 5 foot extension to the edition here at it 11 the building wall and we're proposing a bay as permitted by about the planning code planning code so based on the survey that the project sponsors 0bd the qualifying wall is where the red dash like like that and the dr requesters property they a significant one story to their house the average give us the 5 foot area rear building line here in red the 5 feet is often easier to see this in section you see the different depth and stack the floor plans mentally ill there is the bay area as well as the polyp out as section 36 c that gives us a prospective view it rains the harm new of the block totally habitualable the ground story shows the pop outs on the neighbors area and above the deck i see the significant 12 foot set back from the rear towards the upper story edition the project sponsor architect is apparently concerned about the offer ride and i'm willing to leave it to staff the building height is 38 feet one inch tall to the level that's called out on the plans how

and earlier on fox one of the president's biggest critics on his handling of isis senator lindsey graham accusing mr. obama of sitting on the sidelines while the middle east disintegrates into chaos. >> the president's reluctance to for a ground force and deal with syria is to no arab will join a coalition to fight isil alone. they're not going to defeat isil and allow assad to stay in power who is a puppet of the iranians. this president is sitting on the sidelines, putting our allies at risk and allowing radical islam to run wild throughout the made evident. >> so the question is, why? and i want to go to you first. i think we realized president obama will not have a moment where he is pounding the fist on the table. there will not be a george bush megaphone moment. he will not do it. he will not call it radical islam and identify the problem in the perverted sects of that religion. why doesn't he do more? democrats and republicans both agree we don't want to put boots on the ground. that is actually common ground. why isn't the president stepping up to do more? >> what more can he do? 2,000 airst

forward to voting for miss lynch. >> the order now will be senator kunz and then senator lindsey graham. >> thank you mr. chairman. i will vote no on the confirmation of loretta lynch because of her views on the apparently boundless authority of the president and including specifically this issue of the recent executive amnesty. let me say that i think any suggestion that somehow focusing on this is far a field of what we should be focused on in this confirmation process is ridiculous. this is at the center of her prospective job. this is at the absolute center of her responsibility. not for the president, the president has lots of lawyers and others including the white house counsel. being a top lawyer for the country and these sorted issues are at the center of her job. why did i reach that conclusion? i questioned her at length in my office and in committee and in contrast to a lot of other folks who spoke, i was not at all impressed with her responses. they were completely superficial and political. i asked her obviously about the presidential executive order in my office. my first response was she

mr. president, honored to have you. >> good to see you, fareed. >> lippedcy lindsey graham says he's troubled that you won't use the term "war" with radical islam. >> i think that the way to understand this is there is and element growing out of muslim communities in certain parts of the world that have perverted the religion have embraced a annihilistic violent, almost medieval interpretation of islam. and they're doing damage in a lot of countries around the world. but it is absolutely true that i reject a notion that somehow that kreecreates a religious war because the overwhelming majority of muslims reject that interpretation of islam. they don't even recognize it as being islam. and i think that for us to be successful in fighting this scourge is very important for us to align ourselves with the 99.9% of muslims who are looking for the same thing we're looking for -- order, peace, prosperity and so i don't quibble with labels. i think we all recognize that this is a particular problem that has roots in muslim communities and that the middle east and south asia are sort of ground zero for us needing to win back hea

lindsey graham. senator vitter. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i will vote no on the confirmation of loretta lynch because of her views on the apparently boundless authority of the president, and including specifically this issue of the recent executive amnesty. and let me say i think any suggestion that somehow focusing on this is far afield of what we should be focused on in this confirmation process is ridiculous. this is at the center of her prospective job. this is at the absolute center of her responsibilities, being a top lawyer, not for the president, the president has lots of lawyers and political lawyers and others, including the white house counsel eating the top lawyer for the country. in these sort of issues are at the center of her job. now, why did i reach the conclusion? well, i questioned her at length in my office and in committee, and you know, in contrast to a lot of the folks who spoke, i was not at all impressed with her responses because they were completely superficial and political, in my opinion. i asked her obviously, a

mr. obama is not only one all twisted up, so is his friend mccain, national parks by the way senator mccain are under the jurisdiction of department of interior not homeland security, mccain seemingly companion senator lindsey graham also so eager to fund dhs and the president's executive fiat. >> they texas district court judge ruled it unconstitutional, put our energy to supporting court case, for god's sake don't shut down the premier homeland security defense line called defense of homeland security, if we do, as republicans we'll get blamed. lou: senator gramm did not make it clear did he on how a they could mutt -- they could support that court case, republican senators, all suggestions they prefer a clean dhs funding bill. leaving the president's amnesty fiat to the court. it is hard to believe that these senors those folks failed to comprehend the matter of executive fiat pro sents this nation with a constitutional crisis there is though shrinking from it our constitutional republic hangs in the balance. >> our photo of quote of the evening on the imperial presidency. that is increasingly empireious, problem with what the president is doing is that he is not simply posing a danger to the constitutio

mr. speaker, this body has the responsibility to the american people to do everything we can to make them as secure as we can and to make our country as secure as we can. senator lindsey graham, with whom i served in this body, who now represents south carolina and is a republican member of the senate and an expert on national security, he told his republican colleagues this and again i quote, the worst possible outcome for this nation is to defund the department of homeland security given the multiple threats we face to our homeland, and i will not be part of it. none of us ought to be part of it. 435 of us ought to vote to fund the homeland security department starting on friday. i urge the republican majority to heed this advice of mr. mccaul of mr. graham and frankly countless other republicans in the senate and some in the house to do the responsible thing and let this house work its will on the single subject of our national security. if a clean homeland security appropriation bill were to come to the floor, i am confident -- and i tell my friend, the majority leader, mr. speaker every democrat will vote for it. we're 188 strong. surely there are 30 responsible

senator jeff flake of arizona senator john mccain of arizona senator lindsey graham of south carolina and senator ron johnson of wisconsin. mr. president, we need eight more republican senators, eight more who will come forward and say we need a clean appropriation bill and we need to pass it now. if eight republican senators today will say that, then we can move forward and pass this bill, we can fund this department and stop this gamesmanship. and if the leaders then want to move to a debate on immigration so be it. but let's have eight more republicans join those who have stepped forward so far to make this a reality. i don't understand, frankly the thinking of many of the republicans who oppose the president's approach to immigration. here's what it comes down to. if the president used every penny given to him by congress to deport those who were undocumented in the united states he could reach we think, about 4% of those who are eligible for deportation 4%. what the president has said is let me focus then on deporting those who are most dangerous to the united states. president obama has said there are people who have b