as mr. nunez had mentioned about some of the other things that have come out about leaks and so forth, my constituents asked me the difference in maybe what the attorney general did in going to the court to -- on the rosen case, said he was an unindicted co-conspirator, because that was about a leak also. what type of review did you-all go over before you asked for those phones to be tapped and to make it perfectly clear that was not in a fisa court. is that correct? >> number one, that was not a fisa court. in the rosen case, there were no phones being tapped. it was just to acquire a couple of e-mails. and there is a very, very robust system. it is set out in regulations that the department of justice follows, of the kinds of scrubbing and review that must be done before any subpoena like that can be issued. you have to exhaust all other that that is done before you even get to the decision as to whether or not a rough this is used. you have to make sure the information you are looking at is tai

chairman, i was suggest along with mr. nuÑeznd we think about having nancy marks appear in front of this panel to find out what she knew because mr. miller couldn't remember about what the the conversation was about. there were other names that have been brought appeared today and i would just basketcase and the other names than any of the panel before this committee today, g of names of people you contact did come in that you spoken with, that she received e-mails, can you provide those? i will just start its say your name on work time. >> mr. kookogey. >> mr. kookogey, you can you provide me with names you had communication with? do not guess, the first agent on my case for sheila mae robinson. then my case was switched to the task of mr. ron l. and he was the one who abides abides in his rating on guidance from superiors as americanization and other similar organizations. that was passed to mr. mitch steele in the most recent letter, which came as recently as may 6th westermann woman whose name i can't pronounce. >> we can ge

. >> mr. nunez is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr.ookogey, among the irs agents who demanded answer --. jon: the hearing goes on. we have to take a quick break, pay some bills. we'll be back with more coverage on "happening now." the great outdoors... ...and a great deal. thanks to dad. (gasp) nope. aw! guys! grrrr let's leave the deals to hotels.com. (nice bear!) ooo! that one! nice! got it! oh my gosh this is so cool! awesome! perfect! yep, and no angry bears. the perfect place is on sale now. up to 30% off. only at hotels.com jenna: back to washington, d.c. where the testimony continues by a group of panelists who say they were targeted by the irs. the questioning will go on for about an another hour, hour and a half. so we'll continue to watch what happens in d.c. the responses to the questions from lawmakers and bring you back there as we hear more from d.c. meantime we're going to move onto a few other stories happening today. jon: a fascinating murder trial underway and, perhaps just about at its end but jurors appear deadlocke

as mr. nunezhad mentioned about some of the other things that have come out about leaks and so forth, because my constituents asked me the difference in maybe what the attorney general did in going to the court to -- on the rosen case, saying he was an unindicted co-conspiritor, because that was about a leak also. what type of review did you all go over before you asked for those phones to be tapped and to make it perfectly clear that was not in a fisa court? is that correct? >> number one, that was not a fisa court. in the rosen case, there were no phones being tapped. it was just to acquire a couple of e-mails. and there is a very, very robust system. it is set out in regulations that the department of justice follows, of the kinds of scrubbing and review that must be done before any subpoena like that can be issued. you have to exhaust all other avenues. you have to make sure the information you are looking at is truly necessary to be able to move the investigation forward. there are restrictio

so, mr. nunez goes on to say, "this is an illusion meant to fool the public into believing that amnesty will only take place after the border is secure. nothing could be further from the truth. because on day one, every one of the illegal 11 million illegal aliens will be eligible for a temporary document allowing them to stay and work in the united states, their two most important goals." close quote. so he was united states attorney on the california border, and he worked with these issues and understands it. he had the responsibility of prosecuting cases by the thousands. probably hundreds of thousands. former united states attorney nunez is a very wise and experienced person. all county sheriff's office, florence, arizona, sheriff baboa said this" secure border first or you will repeat history." who he he announced his opposition to the proposed immigration reform offered by the so-called gang of eight officially titled border security economic opportunity and immigration modernization act, she

mentionedas mr. nunezabout the things mentioned about leaks and so forth, my constituents ask me the difference, and maybe what the attorney general did, by going to the courts on the rosen case, saying that he was an unindicted co-conspirator, that was actually about a leak also. process or internal review did you all go through before you ask for those phones to be taxed? and to make it perfectly clear that that was not a fisa court? >> number one, that was not a fisa court and there were no phones being capped, it was just to acquire a couple of e-mails. robust systemy set out in the department of regulations at the time of scrubbing review that must be done before a subpoena like that can be issued. you must make sure that you have exhausted all the reasonable avenues of investigation. that is done before you even get to the decision about whether or not a process should be used. you have to make sure that the information that you are looking at is very tailored and necessary, truly necessary to be abl

so mr. nuÑezes on to say, this is an illusion meant to fool the public into believing they will only take place after the border is secure. nothing could be further from the truth because every one of the 11 million illegal aliens will be eligible for a temporary document stand work in the united states of the two most important goals, close quote. so he was united states attorney on the california border and he worked at these issues and understands that. yet the responsibility of prosecuting cases by the thousand. probably hundreds of thousands frankly. former united states attorney nuÑez is very wise and experienced person. but florence arizona said this, secure border first or you'll repeat history. quote, when he announced his opposition to the proposed immigration reform offered by the so-called gang of a officially titled the economic opportunity and immigration modernist nation that. we must secure the border first within a discussion of green cards and pat to citizenship that are nearly 2

so, mr. nunezoes on to say, "this is an illusion meant to fool the public into believing that amnesty will only take place after the border is secure. nothing could be further from the truth. because on day one, every one of the illegal 11 million illegal aliens will be eligible for a temporary document allowing them to stay and work in the united states, their two most important goals." close quote. so he was united states attorney on the california border, and he worked with these issues and understands it. he had the responsibility of prosecuting cases by the thousands. probably hundreds of thousands. former united states attorney nunez is a very wise and experienced person. all county sheriff's office, florence, arizona, sheriff baboa said this" secure border first or you will repeat history." who he he announced his opposition to the proposed immigration reform offered by the so-called gang of eight officially titled border security economic opportunity and immigration modernization act, sheri