mr. paxton because he had issued that he wanted to present to me. i met with him in his apartment and he showed me the various things that needed to be corrected and i agreed that all of these items needed to be corrected and so i told him that i will take care tf and i wanted it to be caken care of as soon as possible and soon afterwards, i got a letter from mr. paxton where he laid out, and backtrack by saying the major part of the repair was in his bathroom and so soon afterwards i got a letter from mr. paxton saying that he wanted to have a more elaborate bathroom constructed and he had drawn up a sketch in detail about how he would like to have it enlarged with a shower bench and a soap niches and the frameless glass inclosure and a new sink and new tile and much more elaborate job than what i was required to do. at that point, i told him that we could not do that and we were not required to do that. and that is where the controversy has developed from. and so this has gone on for all of this time. we have been willing to do the repairs and he

mr. paxton will you let the property owner in to do the work? >> >> i will let the property owner in to do the work. we have our 7 fairly minor items that don't have too much discretion, we have the one major item being the shower repair and i certainly am not going to just wave my right for contract over quality of items that are used to replace. >> and i am going to be quite concerned about how, if we have place to live, if we don't have a toilet and we have sheetrock dust all over the place in the middle of the school year, especially senior year i am going to be quite concerned about that. >> well, we hear from the property owner that he is will be to relocate your family to another facility during the work, would you be willing to do that? that is all that i am asking. >> with regards to that, yes, and i also want to have a scope of material and i have given him a list of materials, that are acceptable. i have already provided that. >> i just wanted a yes. >> yes. >> for the department. >> right. this is... i am not an attorney. i have done

paxton and i am the tenant. i urge you to deny the appeal mr. quinn wants to appeal, these violations have continued for over, for nearly 4 years. and they, he and his wife have successfully delayed compliance. there were 8 violations. and he has corrected none of them. the owner and some of them are pretty simple. cleaning out the vents. that has not been done. and the owners are contractors, property, managers and attorneys, have been in our unit on dozens of occasions, to say that i have denied them access and an out and out misrepresentation, what is true is that they feel that they can maneuver the violations into an excuse for not living up to their strong and unique contractual obligations under my lease which i negotiated with the procedure owner. he never read my lease before he purchased the building, and he is bound by the contract, he voluntarily agreed to be bound by. the situation at 330 procido avenue is one that is too common in the city, water leaks are treated by housing as a cosmetic problem when they frequently cause serious