mr. robinson had donated to anyone's campaign? >> who is scott robinson? >> he owns housing court inc.. >> i don't know why you brought bay drugs into it. what was this bay and drug thing? >> there is the reason for you to investigate his financial connections because that would be the interest of bay drugs. >> if you are making a suggestion that someone else's testimony is tainted, you would make sure that your client, even though there once removed, did not also contribute. -- even though they are once removed, did not contribute. >> i'm understand that and that is an excellent point, commissioners. i would point out that i have never actually met mr. robinson. i have dealt entirely with ms. morgan. i have no financial interest in this case. i'm doing this case simply because i believe in the strength of my client's position and have a lot of sympathy for that community. i used to live in the tenderloin. my mind and heart is with that community and that is why i am representing the appellants. >> to contribute to a campaign is someone's first amendment r

mr. robinson on behalf of his party and mr. jury was a standing to challenge -- >> but after the election was over. >> yes i am aware of that. >> one of the different than anybody else? >> pecos firstly can't speak to why. >> i'm not saying why. i am saying because of what is brought after the election they don't have an interest. so, what is it that distinguishes them from anybody else? >> first this is a matter -- >> they aren't declaring that they want the next election so what is their role? >> we are not asking it to be rerun. we are asking the government be shut down. >> and you're not alleging -- you're not seeing you on this release because you're planning to run next time clocks >> it's to speculate whether mr. drake will run next time. we're you different from anybody else? >> first of all because there is a ruling that is challenging from the federal court. number two -- >> i'm sorry -- was in that somebody challenging -- to make it wasn't a candidate, it was a general citizen this matter could come up again. we coul

mr. robinson. he thoroughly vetted this tenant. maybe he is having us believe that he did this. he comes off to me as a very sincere individual, concerned about the neighborhood. he is a fourth generation san franciscan. he has owned this pediculicide 40 generations. he has another tenant in the same area. he must be concerned about them. i think as bad as perhaps the drugs are, i think it has been clearly stated and i have read that that is a nexus for crime and it does create a problem. the other thing that impressed me was that it had to do with the people who showed up. maybe they are acting beyond their purview. maybe the strict reading this not allow them to have done what they did. maybe it does. that is not something that is before us. i think undeniably, these are people who are concerned about the tenderloin. they have a demonstrated record of doing positive things in that area. legitimate businesses move into the area would be positive. this comes as a great disappointment to those people who have been here many many times over this. i cannot support of their appeal.

mr. robinson, then a share of the american independent party, and mr. drake, a vice presidential candidate, were not given a level playing field so that they could run against a candidate who is eligible -- >> they did not file until the election was completely over and the results were certified and president obama was sworn in. what does it have to do with the election? >> again, your honor, i will have to defer to dr. tate on that. i was brought in for a variety of reasons much later in the process. i came in at the request of mr. drake and mr. robinson, and we won his appeal on argument before judge carter. >> i don't see why you have standing. i still to see why you have standing -- i still don't see why you have standing. >> as judge carter pointed out in his ruling, your honor, the ruling that the department of justice have a great ramifications. i will present the vice presidential candidate and the chairman of a minor party, and judge carter talked at length in his ruling, and i argued, about how to release such as this -- how or ruling out suc

mr. robinson on behalf of his party and mr. jury was a standing to challenge -- >> but after the election was over. >> yes i am aware of that. >> one of the different than anybody else? >> pecos firstly can't speak to why. >> i'm not saying why. i am saying because of what is brought after the election they don't have an interest. so, what is it that distinguishes them from anybody else? >> first this is a matter -- >> they aren't declaring that they want the next election so what is their role? >> we are not asking it to be rerun. we are asking the government be shut down. >> and you're not alleging -- you're not seeing you on this release because you're planning to run next time clocks >> it's to speculate whether mr. drake will run next time. we're you different from anybody else? >> first of all because there is a ruling that is challenging from the federal court. number two -- >> i'm sorry -- was in that somebody challenging -- to make it wasn't a candidate, it was a general citizen this matter could come up again. we coul

started as he was trying to draw awareness he thought that this would be funny and we live in such a mrs robinson culture where a boy has sex with his female teacher and everyone's like. oh buddy good show is one of the does that give you that you back on and say if you fall on those who would you give him jim. i don't know if you guys ever had it i'm from california and in and out burger is you know we're famous for it properly delicious i love it and it texas was just blessed with their very first in and out but i mean there are you know cars lined up for a mile or two and some people really really freaking out take a look at this clip. i just i mean it just so overwhelming. they all night you can see it's so real you know you were there because. she was at the time. i mean. it's really good to keep some points in until they're ready to you know it's i'm living in california. you know you might not be able to get americans to protest a war and be passionate about that but when it comes to a burger the way you know wine for miles and then cry about it you know this speaks volumes about america l

the last to say that peter robinson joins us now from the hague thanks very much for your time mr robinson now i understand that you have actually visited. today in prison how did he react to this news. well president kerry said that he was story that general audits had lost his freedom and that he hopes that they could work together when general melodic came to the hague and try to bring out the truth of what really happened in bosnia what does that mean that we can expect the revelations about the war we're going to get new information from these two. well i don't know new information is coming out all of the time and not to carry this trial and so it's very possible that with charitable audits in the hague that additional information will come out. an idea from you all point of view as a lawyer could you give us an idea of how the legal procedures will be taking place following this arrest what's the process. well first general malott it's will appear before a judge and be asked to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty and then the chamber will make a decision as to whether or not he wil

mr. robinson on behalf of his party and mr. was over. >> yes i am aware of that. >> one of the different than anybody else? >> pecos firstly can't speak to why. >> i'm not saying why. i am saying because of what is brought after the election they don't have an interest. so, what is it that distinguishes them from anybody else? >> first this is a matter -- >> they aren't declaring that they want the next election so what is their role? >> we are not asking it to be rerun. we are asking the government be shut down. >> and you're not alleging -- you're not seeing you on this release because you're planning to run next time clocks >> it's to speculate whether mr. drake will run next time. we're you different from anybody else? >> first of all because there is a ruling that is challenging from the federal court. number two -- >> i'm sorry -- was in that somebody challenging -- to make it wasn't a candidate, it was a general citizen this matter could come up again. we could never again in 2012 the issue of mr. obama who's already bee

rabbi robinson and mr. mulgan were in touch from arlington cemetery.ngressional approval for all memorials at arlington cemetery and we are rectifying that today with this bill. it should be pointed out that the section of the bill that we are going to be sponsoring mirrors senate action. although it's part of a larger bill it will take effect as soon as their action takes effect. it does not need a signing of the president. they notified the jewish chaplains council and they finally reached out to me. i was touched by these great men and quickly introduced a resolution to fix the problem. senator schumer is the sponsor of the senate bill. it has 86 co-sponsors and has been endorsed by 35 jewish organizations and 47 jewish war veterans chapters have added to the bill. the jewish federation of north america and shelly rude have been working to help pass this bill and recognize the achievements of these 13 jewish chaplains. i also want to thank major gretchen combarner from arlington cemetery for helping us navigate the army's process. my staff has been

mr. yule did. he did what any god-fearing, persevering, respectable white man would do in the circumstances. he swore out a warrant. no doubt signing it with his left hand. and tom robinson now sits before you having taken the oath with the only good hand he possesses. his right hand. so humble, respectable, quiet negro who had the unmitigated at the merit to feel sore -- temerity for a white person. i need not remind you of their appearance or conduct on the stand. you saw them for yourselves. the witnesses of the state, with the exception of the sheriff of macom county, has presented them to yourselves, you gentlemen, of the court in their confidence that their testimony would not be doubted. believing that you gentlemen would go along with them on the assumption, the evil assumption that all negros lie, that all negros are basically immoral beings, that all negros are not to be trusted around our women. which, gentlemen, as you know in itself a lie as black as tom robinson's skin. a lie i do not need to explain to you. you know the truth and the truth is this -- that some negros lie. some negros are immoral. some negros are not to be trusted around women, black or whi

mr. president. the best one is that guy who goes to his left all the time on the basketball court. >> michelle obama's brother, craig robinson. this is "piers morgan tonight." google chris culver and you'll get more than 2.5 million results. he's an overnight sensation and has millions of fans across the country hanging on his every word. i will be, too. >> awesome. great. thank you. >> i don't know why i do this to myself. there you are, the cover. >> yes. >> which has eluded me so far. >> it's coming. >> two copies of hollywood reporter. this year alone. there you are on both of them. and then this one, which absolutely -- i've got to be honest -- sickens me. i have spent 46 years in journalism, in broadcasting. desperate to get on the top 100 of "time" magazine's most influential people. >> there i am. >> there you are, first shout. you're not even inside. you're on the cover under the banner. >> right under the -- yeah. >> the most prominent head on the whole damn thing. >> right on my forehead. >> how old are you? >> i am turn 2g 1 in two weeks. >> this is ridiculous. how did you do this? >> i have an fastic publicity t

robinson from the bbc. can you confirm that you plan to escalate the war in libya by sending ground attack helicopters? mr. president, you talked about a new war in libya. is that different between bush and the blair? >> the president and i agree that we should be turning up the heat. the pressure is on the regime of. the rebels has successfully liberatedmuch of [unintelligible] qc is in the growth of the national transition. i believe we should be turning of that pressure, and we will be looking at all of the options for turning up the pressure in the terms of the un resolution 1973. we need to keep in force and that resolution, pressing that regimes of the people have a chance to decide their own future. those are the options we will look at. q asked a question about this relationship and past relationships. every relationship is different. i would say both of us strongly believe in the special relationship. as i said in my speech, we have to learn the lessons of history how best to promote the values that we share. it means going with the grain of other cultures, having a patient and understanding buil