mr. walker? >> i think -- again, your house is beautiful and we all appreciate that we get into our times, but this is an egress issue and been happening since 1984, 1986 is when it expired so i guess i'd be willing to go for four months, but no longer than that. and the other issue -- i mean, i think we need to set the clock on both of these so i'd say four months for resolving both of the issues and up hold the -- what are the fees involved? >> thousand plus. >> the [inaudible] fee is $1038. >> i mean, here's -- are we in discussion or are we -- >> yeah, we're in discussion still, yeah. >> i feel like this has gone on a long time and that it's really our job to say here, yes, there's violations and you need to get this back. our staff has been involved with, you know, >> i'd be willing to give it more time than four months. it's not hurting anyone. it's egress. it's not a license safety issue. i can see the neighbors or the realtor might be annoyed, but i actually think we have much bigger fish

mr. walker. >> good evening, i would like to compliment you for calling this hearing. and i am very upset over the fact that that man over the housing authority stand here and tell you a deliberate lie. they are selling those units to those developers. i am involved with one of the companies, the only black company that bid. there is no black company involved in their construction. they think this is a joke of theirs. but for him to stand and tell you they are not doing demolition. they are already doing demolition. and he has no respect of you as a supervisor, and stand here and tell you a lie, they are not going do that. they are going to tear down potrero hill, and those places are already falling down. and to add insult to injury, what you don't know, the developers get the land for free. because the government is going to give them the money to do the work for the city, and they ain't out of a dime. and they don't have no black contractors on the job, and only say they have to have that tabernacle group work for them. this is no way -- 40% of the all evictions in

walker. >> yes. >> motion carries unanimously. >>> owner of resident appellant mr. king, 641 48th avenue. action requested by a appellant to reverse order of abatement. >> this is also a single family dwelling and the violation relates to the vacant building ordinance. an order of abatement was issued on 3-18 of last yore. year. staff recommends to up hold the order of abatement and up hold assessment of costs due to the fact of not clear utilities received and also maintenance issues that are continuing with the building. thank you. >> is the appellant here? would you mind coming up? >> i bought the home in september of 82 because i used to drive along the great highway and i always admire closeness to the ocean and i have continually lived at the same home in september of '82. so it was a total surprise that someone from the neighborhood filed a complaint that i wasn't living there. our neighbor next door told us about the development of [inaudible] below our house so my wife and i went to the planning department here in the '80s and also in the early '90s to save [inaudible] as open la

basis that at&t could conduct another box walk so parents and he walkers could identify additional sites. well, my time is up >> okay. mr. quan. >> commissioners john quan from the dksz again. i think in many ways the time issue we've beat it to death i want to talk about the location for randall street the department received 12 objections based on that the hearing officer did open the hearing for 20 days. to evaluate proposals. during the hearing one the observe terse identified three locations and the department did receive at the end of 20 days at&t response was those locations are more than 3 hundred photo away from our cabinet and therefrom they don't satisfy the requirement. the departments expectation was for at&t to meet with the obtain terrors to identify those additional locations in those 3 locations didn't satisfy at&t requirements to find a resolution that didn't happen. in relation to 33 of walter street we received a petition from 29 people observing to the placement and based on this on our hearing okay. we directed at&t with opening for 20 days to have a followup what walk and they do. i was reported t

. >> and joining me is the politics editor for the "business insider" hunter wal r walker, and welcome back. and so mris throwing david wilestein and others under the bus. >> well, he is throwing them under the bus, and that has been the administration's party line so far. these were sort of rogue people who did what drewniak said were idiotic things with the lane closures, but he is going to have to face some difficult questions with the legislative comm committee which is interested in showing the communications that he was advising wildstein with how to handle this the night before he resigned. >> and later, committee members will hear from patrick foi whth executive director who ordered those lanes reopened, and what will they hear from him? >> well, i heard that he was postponed, but when he does come up, it is going to be interesting to see what the cuomo edadministration did when they found out about this situation. we know that foye immediate ly reopened the lanes, and sort of blasted everybody on the jersey side saying this is a bi-state agency and the bridge goes from new york to new jersey.

mr. jaffe? spin on a two edged point, both jared walker and james holmes were identified by the mental health system as needing treatment, and in both cases they kept their parents in the dark before the tragedy. so, what he is talking about is this is also new to me and i want t to thank the congressmen that are here today and mr. murphy, congressman murphy. what you are seeing is something different going on. we have had tons of mental health bills. this is the first one that focuses on the elephant in the room, which is how do we get people knows to have serious mental illness, and in particular, adults. there's been a lot of effort to children, veterans, but adults know that go untreated and this is the first bill that does that. we agree with the majority of the report and we are not advocates for mental health. we are not advocates for improving the mental health of all americans. what we are is advocates for the most serious mentally ill. not all until illness is serious. 20%, 100% of adults can have the mental health improved and that's where a lot of the federal money goes. 20% of adults ha

walker called him pejoratively at dropout. he said something that the right that disagreed with. he made mr. urkel claimed for historical interpretation that the rate that disagreed with and in response, the right to point out they haven't been to college. i think that is extraordinarily dangerous for a number of reasons. in fact, it wasn't the headline in the discussion to this piece. a number of people suggested scott walker, for example would be a strong presidential candidate. going through college for his son issues you can stick with something that has been in the military. frankly this working job on direct debit donald's not sure that was particularly different in terms of applications. i thought i would write and point out firstly this is not the road we want to go down. secondly, dropout is not a pejorative when you look at american history. >> host: what do you mean? >> guest: well, first start, the president in american history first-come abraham lincoln didn't go to college at all. now we have as an ideal nice country and nice country and one is an immigrant i think it's a beaut

mr. joe austin. (applause) >> and from woodside learning center, constance walker. (applause) >> congratulations to our teachers of the year. and at this time i'd like to turn the mic over to the president of the united educators of san francisco, president dennis kelly. (applause) >> thank you. these five teachers standing on the field with us today are incredible. they are dedicated. they are hard working. they are innovative. they are exactly what we need in every classroom. i am privileged and proud to be here and to honor them tonight. to the teachers who are with us in the crowd, all 300 of you, to all of our hard working san francisco unified school district teachers and paraprofessionals, we thank you for your dedication to san francisco and to our young people. on behalf of the united educators of san francisco, all of the teachers, all of the paraprofessionals in san francisco, thank you to the giants, and to all of you for your support of the students and our schools. go giants! (applause) >> thank you all so much. ladies and gentlemen, a round of applaus