i have never been fan of nafta. we are going to bring our jobs back.oing to have ford and other countries -- companies, instead of going down to mexico, and lots of other places. lots of other places. we'll have them built here. we'll give them the incentive they need to built here go ahead. go ahead. go ahead, darling. >> hi, mr. trump. i'm a volunteer with the league of conservation voters and here to ask you what your plan is to reduce pollution driving climate change, and endangers public health? >> that's an interesting question. let me ask you a question. take it easy, fella. how many people -- how many people here believe in global warming? do you believe in global warming? who believe inside global warming? who believes in global warming? [shouting] who believes in global warming. raise your hand. wow. not much. huh? do you have your hand up? a little? no? no? nobody? one person. >> that's -- >> you believe, right? ery.eogo a gwesunniynee inra mpl hñtrfat dp>> wg >> do you believe the way to make people more efficient is to threaten to take awa

of new england to mexico and other places i have never been a fan of nafta. we will bring jobs back to have forged and other companies instead of going to mexico and other places places, lots of other places, we will have them built here and give them the incentive that they needed to build here. >> i am a volunteer with the conservation voters and what is your plan to reduce pollution that drives climate change to endanger public health? trump: that is an interesting question. let me ask you. take it easy. how many people here believe said global warming? we'll believes in global warming? who believes in global warming? >> [inaudible] trump: raise your hand. not much. nobody? one person. that is interesting. you believe? will do two more questions. let's go. >> just last week one of the other candidate said he thought the closure system was good because it kept workers on their toes to believe the way to make people more efficient is to threaten to take away their jobs and those that support our voluntary? trump: you said that is what is happening? i heard t

i am not and never have been a fan of nafta. we are going to bring our jobs back. we'll have ford and the other companies instead of going down to mexico and a lots of other places we'll have them build here. we'll give them the incentive they need to build here. go ahead. >> hi, mr. trump. i'm a volunteer with the league of conservation voters and i am asking you your plan to reduce pollution that is driving climate change and endangering public health. >> that's an interesting -- let me ask you a question. let me ask you this. okay. take it easy, fellows. here believe in global warming? do you? who believes in global warming? ho believes in global warming? who believes in global warming? raise your hand. wow. not much. do you have your hand up? a little? no. nobody? one person? >> sir, that -- >> you believe, right? okay. > we'll do two more questions. let's go. right here. right here. go ahead. just last week one of the other candidates said that he thought the base realignment and closure system was good because it kept workers on their toes. do you believe tha

. >> 2007, during a debate, you said nafta was a mistake in hindsight. do you still believe that?he time i thought nafta held out a lot of promise, but the fact that a lot of the so-called side agreements were not actually in the treaty, i thought was a problem. and it has turned out that i don't think we had enough of an enforcement mechanism in dealing with nafta. now, i don't think it's as bad or as good as either it's detractors or its supporters say, but i think we've learned, or at least i hope we've learned how better to do trade agreements. i voted against cafta because i didn't think the lessons were learned. >> what about abortion restrictions? >> that's in rowe v. wade, restrictions in the third trimester, but they have to take into account the life and health of the mother. my husband vetoed a very restrictive legislation on late-term abortions and he vetoed it at an event in the white house where we invited a lot of women who had faced this very difficult decision, that ought to be made based on their own conscience, their family, their faith, in consultation with doc

[applause] many of us remember nafta. many of us remember nafta. we traded away good manufacturing jobs and in return we got back empty promises and empty pockets. i am fundamentally and adamantly opposed to secret trade deals that are congress has forced to vote on before we are allowed as citizens to repent. -- to read them. [applause] it is not what the other countries are doing to us, it is what we are not doing for ourselves. we need to build up our own american economy. [applause] world is role in the to lead by example, the cause arising global middle class free .rom oppression, hunger, fear the images of the humanitarian refugee crisis in syria that all of us have seen, that little , parentsy washing running for their lives with kids in their arms, those images tell us that as a nation we can and must do better if we will have credibility as a moral leader among nations. [applause] our own policies of forcibly detaining women and children refugees in for-profit detention camps on our southern border tells us we are not leading up to our pri

i've not been a fan of nafta. you know about nafta better than anybody, because your places have been stripped out of all of new england. and you know what's happened, they've gone to mexico, they've gone all over the place. but you -- i am not and i have never been a fan of nafta. we are going to bring our jobs back. we're going to have ford and these other countries -- companies instead of going down to mexico, and lots of other places, lots of other laces, we're going to have them build here. we're going to give them the incentive that they need to build here. go ahead. go ahead. [applause] go ahead, darling. >> hi, mr. trump. >> hi. >> i'm megan, i'm a volunteer with the league of conservation voters, and i'm here to ask you what you're going to do against pollution that is endangering public health? >> that's an interesting -- let me ask you a question. let me ask you this, okay? take it easy, fellas. how many people, how many people here believe in global warming? do you believe in global warming? who believ

del pretorio parece repercutir en todo el mundo, menos en argentina que tiene una de las gasolinas o naftaitro 1.36 dÓlares. este nacional se forma una polÍtica que intenta promover la regiÓn nacional. esto luego de que de que la presidenta argentina dijo que estarÍa a cargo de el combustible. si la particiÓn de mÁs del 40% de hidrocarburos. ilia: el informe puede ser el primer estado de cambiar las reglas del bÉisbol. periodista: en la tarde cualquiera mientras mÍnimo de niÑos de california sueÑan con llegar a las grandes ligas de california. la legislatura le da un jonrÓn a las grandes ligas proviene de que continÚe con la tradiciÓn simbólica de su deporte. entrevistado: hay mucha gente que juega bÉisbol en el aÑo. los jÓvenes se cansa, esto es importante para los jÓvenes. periodista: se explica como corredor de quinto joven intentan demoler las plÁtica de sus jugadores hasta de sus entrenadores. una prÁctica que en dos convence a los padres de familia y algunos tÉcnicos del deporte. entrevistados. pienso que es una tradiciÓn mÁs que un gusto bueno, es +1 gusto para ellos pero creo que h

>> sounds like bernie sanders and looks like it would start a trade war, nafta violation. however, it's not a free market if you move a factory someplace to avoid domestic cost, regulations, environmental rules. so you can equalize that kind of maneuver with taxes because they don't want to have the rules in mexico or whatever and then it is a free market. you wouldn't need the tax or tariff with japan or germany because they play by the rules. but they're literally taking our jobs by dodging regulations. so he's right on this if you get into about it. >> don't we have to think about the consumers in this? >> oh, them, the consumers? i agree with jonas even talking about how bernie sanders might like this. i think this is a great idea if you're a democrat and you don't believe in globalization and what free markets do. and this is very perplexing to me because i disagree, i do think that ultimately what will happen in this state, about if he calls up the guy and says you got to keep your factory and work a back room deal, of course what will happen, they won't -- car compa

touched off on the subject of nafta. when clinton enacted nafta, it was called nafta.org. in the lower left-hand corner it announced job losses in america. with this upcoming agreement what are the protections for americans in keeping their jobs here in america? and the other part of the picture i started researching is no one ever considered transportation costs. shipping costs, fuel, airline costs is fuel, to another country, back to america and more shipping costs are also attached to that. now are americans going to be protected from losing their jobs if this trade agreement goes through? >> you can ask the administration and they will tell you they are negotiating this deal in a way that would raise all these standards. telling vietnam to raise your labor standards to a certain extent that would mitigate in some way the transfer of jobs to that market. same with the environment rules. under specific chapters of the agreement, there are also going to be safeguards, i think. under the automobile rules, i think the u.s. is negotiating what's called a sauveguard which wou

bush negotiated nafta. so when i became president, what i did was negotiate labor and environmental deals on the sideline and the establishment of a north american development bank to try to deal with some of the challenges along the rio grande river. and we tried to enforce the trade laws. keep in mind, in most of the years i was president, we gained manufacturing jobs in america. our trade deficit got bigger because we were growing so much faster than the rest of the world. and because we had tripled -- no, quadrupled the debt of the country in the 12 years before i took office. so it took four years to balance the budget. and then start producing surpluses. if you run a deficit and you're growing faster than everybody else, you're going to have a trade deficit. our biggest deficit trade growth was with china with whom we had no trade agreement. mexico, we had a big deficit with because half of it was in the oil we bought from mexico. we were then importing oil. and if i had not signed that bill, think wh

which is absolutely ludicrous, so much worse than even nafta was. it would cost jobs and it will cause a lot of unemployment this location. it will allow china to participate and get all that the -- benefits of tpp by sending products to other countries. china can make 70% of your product is set to another country making a 25% of the product and that would get the benefits as if it were more -- were made in the tpp countries. >> on the presidential endorsement process, the afl-cio has traditionally waited to see how the primaries played out, the exceptions were in 2000 with gore and 84 with mondale. do you see any scenario in which the afl-cio endorses before the iowa caucuses or new hampshire primaries? are you seeing any consensus among larger member unions, any consensus among larger unions or has the vice president's recent deliberations essentially put that endorsement process on ice? >> i think most of our affiliates are still going through the process that i described earlier. going to membership, getting the facts, trying to find out whether

trump said if elected, he'll rip up nafta and keep american jobs from going to mexico. >> let's say ford moves to mexico. if they want to sell that car in the united states, they pay a tax. here's what's going to happen it. they're not going to build their plant there. they'll build it in the united states. >> but there is a north american free trade agreement. >> but there shouldn't be. it's a disaster. >> you can watch this on sunday's premier of 60 minutes here on wusa9. the candidate talks about his immigration plans and reveals a major part of his tax platform for the first time. >>> president barack obama and his wife michelle welcomed the chinese president and his wife to the white house for a steak dinner tonight. the black tie event is being held in honor of xi jinping. the guest list includes former secretary of state henry kissenger and actor film winner lee daniels. back on the menu by popular demand, maine lobster, very popular the last time the white house hosted china at a state dinner back in 2011. >> michelle obama decided to wear a dress by chinese american designer ver

with nafta it was 65%. so the product have to be 65% made in mexico, u.s.nd canada to get the tariff reduction and protection. if it wasn't then it didn't get that protection. that has dropped out and is not into, talking about in the 20s, 20%. which is absolutely ludicrous that this is so much worse than even have to was come and nafta proved ineffective on the issue. it will cost jobs and it will cause a lot of unemployment, dislocation and allow china to purchase it and get all the benefits of tpp by senator products to of the country. so china can make 70% of a product, send it to another country that makes 25% of the product and the product will get the benefits as if it were made in the tpp countries. >> on the presidential endorsement process, the afl-cio has traditionally waited to see if the primaries play out. the exceptions were in 2000 with al gore and 84 with mondale. do you see any scenario in which the afl-cio endorses before the iowa caucuses by the new hampshire primaries? secondly, or using any consensus among her larger member unions -- >

[applause] many of us remember nafta. many of us remember nafta.traded away good manufacturing jobs and in return we got back empty promises and empty pockets. i am fundamentally and adamantly opposed to secret trade deals that are congress has forced to vote on before we are allowed as citizens to repent. -- to read them. [applause] it is not what the other countries are doing to us, it is what we are not doing for ourselves. we need to build up our own american economy. [applause] world is role in the to lead by example, the cause arising global middle class free .rom oppression, hunger, fear the images of the humanitarian refugee crisis in syria that all of us have seen, that little , parentsy washing running for their lives with kids in their arms, those images tell us that as a nation we can and must do better if we will have credibility as a moral leader among nations. [applause] our own policies of forcibly detaining women and children refugees in for-profit detention camps on our southern border tells us we are not leading up to our princip

people don't understand why we have this mass migration from central america and mexico and things like nafta that were passed really took away many of the jobs of the people in central america and mexico. if we look at countries like gawt malguatemala, as long as we the position of exploitation of other countries we will always have turmoil in the world and we will always have migration. >> dolores huerta very good to have you with us. thank you. >> thank you very much. >>> lebanon has dealt with the garbage problem in beirut. demonstrators filled the streets again today in what's being called the you stink movement. they are outraged by the piles of the uncollected garbage in the streets of the lebanese capital. >>> rwanda is sitting a hearing for later this month, opposition forces want to stop paul kagame from running for another term. al jazeera's catherine soy reports from kigale. >> it is hard to imagine rwanda without president paul kagame. he seemed to bring order to the area. >> if it's changed to allow him to run again we'll agree with that. >> translator: it's for us to decide and

helpment that really does workers and changes the rules of the environment because you've group ofe nafta a rules designed to lower wages, give corporations more entitlement and we want an end to that so you're seeing the residuals of that. he supported it firmly, still oppose it.e david: do you agree with the "new york times" story this that in his argues second term obama's taken a turn helping workers with various regulation? do you notice a change? mr. trumka: i would say he's probably been more overtly pro term. in the second you have overtime rules that we've talked about. his appointments that he'd made to various places. wage increases he's given to federal employees, his starting openly about how bargainingollective is for workers to raise their standard of living. the fact that he's having a the whites year at house to talk about collective bargaining and increasing the workers' voice. comenk all of those together to say, yeah, i think in the second term he has done. now, when you talk about regulations, there's also health regulations and something that genuinely me.ers country

after nafta, all went across the borders, donald trump committed to bring the jobs back from china, and mexico, if you talk to labor unions they would support that, i am sure -- >> this is why i think high does have a lot of cross market appeal. >> i agree with you. he is speaking the voice of the common man. trish: union employees say this is not fair, i lost my job to oversea competitors if we put more tariffs in place that would help protect me and my family going forward. >> we'll continue this conversation, we'll talk about who the guest candidate is right now to fix our economy. a business vet like don do donap or carly fiorini? or a long time politician like scott walker. special edition, primetime of the intelligence report. [announcer:] what if one stalk of broccoli could protect you from cancer? what if one push up could prevent heart disease? [man grunts] one wishful thinking, right? but there is one step you can take to help prevent another serious disease- pneumococcal pneumonia. one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you ... from pneumococcal pneumonia, an il

he would not be bound by the terms of the nafta agreement. >> it is a disaster. >> it is there, so for you will >> you will have to renegotiate or break it. >> you cannot just break the law. >> excuse me, every agreement has an end. >> nafta allows free trade between the united states, canada, and mexico. trump is saying we need fair trade, not free trade. >>> a scare when carmy fiorina was deliverying a -- delivering a message in texas. the drapes in the ballroom started to fall. >>> on capitol hill, john boehner is saying there will not be a government shot down on wednesday. he appeared on "face the nation" yesterday. and the house and senate will pass a bill this week to keep the government running. >> i expect we might have a little bit more cooperation from some around town to give i don't want to leave my successor. >> that cu-- cooperation from democrats. >>> police issued three summons after his saturday motorcycle crash in new jersey. he was driving without a license, did not have insurance, and no registration card. he was hospitalized with minor injuries after his motorcycl

with nafta, it was 65%. the product had to be 65% made in mexico, u.s., and canada to get the tariff reduction. if it wasn't, it didn't get that protection. that has dropped down and is now in the 20's. are you seeing any consensus against her larger member unions , or has the vice president recent deliberations essentially put that endorsement process on ice jacket -- on ice jacket -- on ice? most of our affiliates are still going through that process. trying to find out where their members are, what they want. most of them have not completed the process yet. i think you've got several unions that have endorsed, so far, and they went through the process. the nurses did that. bernie sanders. ast did that, they endorsed hillary. the machinists endorsed hillary. the process continues. some are more further along than others. probably within a month or so ready to endorse. we have encourage that. we have encourage them, after go with that out, but make them deal with our issues. make sure those issues are promi

they have been mad at the clintons about nafta for years. so, this is just another fuel to that fire that the unions are out there shoving. >> will it push president obama to do anything? that could indicate whether he is going team biden or team clinton? >> it's another layer to this and i don't think we know yet. who knows? he is going to have to be very general gearly gingerly in how he deals with a potential biden getting. in i don't think we will see this president taking sides at all. >> he we will see whether or not he is -- might be unhappy with somebody. who knows? anyway, nina, jackie, thank you. >> thank you. >> the pope takes washington. we are live with someone who has been traveling with pope francis on his plane. also, there are horrible allegations that may have led to the murder of a u.s. marine. that marine's father is here next. when you do business everywhere, the challenges of keeping everyone working together can quickly become the only thing you think about. that's where at&t can help. at&t has the tools and the networ

i have not and i've never been a fan of nafta. we are to bring our jobs back. we're going to have ford and these other companies -- instead of going down to mexico and lots of other places, lots of other places, we're going to have them built here. we're going to give the incentive the need to build to could go ahead, darling. >> i am megan and a volunteer e of a leagu conservation voters. i want to know what your plan is to reduce climate change and endangering public health. donald trump: let me ask you a question. let me ask you this. take it easy, fellas. how many people here believe in global warming? do you believe in global warming? who believes in global warming? who believes in global warming? [chant and yells] who believes in global warming? raise your hand. wow, not much. do you have your hand up? no. nobody? one person? a rally wheres people do not believe in it. donald trump: we're going to do two more questions. let's go. go ahead. right here. go ahead. >> just last week, one of the other candidates said that he thought the base realignment and cl

i guess with the mexico you have seen that migration under nafta.uess you could main -- that could not happen as extensively as ttp. nobody shift operations to others in the countries. host: rick is on the line now. good morning. i have a question for you, you touched off on the subject of nafta. nafta was created, a website was created called nafta.org. it identifies child losses in america. what other protections for americans keeping their jobs here in america? the other thing i started researching is no one ever considered transportation cost. airline cost is fuel. are americans going to be protected from losing jobs if this trade agreement goes through? guest: demonstration would tell you that they are negotiating the so way that would rate all -- that would raise all the standards. telling vietnam to raise your start and standards in a way that would mitigate the transfer jobs to that market. same with the environmental rules. in the specific chapters there are going to be safeguards. i think the u.s. is negotiating , which would prevent a sur

[applause] many of us remember nafta. many of us remember nafta. we traded away good manufacturing jobs and in return we got back and he promises an empty pockets. i am fundamentally, adamantly opposed as an american to secret trade deals that our congress is forced to vote on before we are even allowed as citizens to read them. [applause] it is not what the other countries are doing to us. it is what we are not doing for ourselves. we need to build up our own american economy. [applause] america's role in the world -- america's role in the world is .o lead by example the cause of a rising middle class free from oppression, free from hunger and want, free from fear. the images of the humanitarian refugee crisis in syria that all of us have seen -- that little boy's body washing up on a beach . parents running for their lives with their kids in their arms. those images tell us that as a nation we can and must do better if we are to have any credibility as a moral leader among nations. [applause] and our own policies of forcibly detaining women and c

you are looking at a senator and former congressman who has voted against nafta, against cafta, against permanent normal trade relations with china that is going to help lead the opposition to this disastrous transpacific partnership. and anyone who wants to take a hard look at the economy and anyone who wants to know how we rebuild the middle class, how we lower our poverty rates, how we put people to work at decent-paying jobs has got to take a hard look at wall street. wall street, as all of you know, through their greed, their recklessness, their illegal behavior, drove this country into the worst economic downturn since the great depression. and millions of people are still feeling the impact of what wall street did. now, here's what's interesting. the congress, against my vote, voted to bail out wall street because they were too big to fail. in other words, if they went down, half the economy would go with them. today three out of four of the largest financial institutions in america today are significantly larger than they were when we bailed them out because they were too big to

that's when al gore and ross perot debated nafta with 16.8 million viewers. now this debate even bigger. why do the ratings matter? all those candidates on stage had a huge opportunity to swag te sway tens of millions of voters. 23 million viewers is the average of the viewer ship for those 180 minutes. it turns out the prime time debate reached 37.9 million people. those are amazing numbers in television. fox's debate averaged 24 million. this is the biggest show of the fall. what is causing all this? is it all trump and what does it mean for the candidates at the networks? david, david, welcome to all of you. thank for being here. is it all trump? are these ratings entirely thanks to donald trump? >> you've had for eight years or almost eight years democratic in the white house. they're looking for this our opportunity to reclaim the white house. i absolutely think this is donald trump. you look at the monster numbers at the debate and look at the undercard. you have candidates that are scoring within the margin of error on that stage for the lesser debate.

in 2008 she was against nafta, and now against this trade deal but before she was for it as secretarye, negotiating for it. she is starting to look really unreliable. going back and forth on a number of issues. >> i'll be doing this with other guests. it is your guess that the big beneficiary on the republican side could be carly fiorina? >> she is strong. she has the business background. she is a traditional conservative on the economic issues. donald trump is starting to sound a lot like a tremendous cat so fiorina is the go-to economic candidate if you want traditional conservatism and one with a business brown. >> all right. she is not bad for a kid. >>> we were mentioning carly fiorina and on a number of issues, she is hitting all the right buttons. but is she really the better of the business guys in this race to fix this economy? after all the only other guy is donald trump. a focus group and a read from frank luntz after this. >>> we need the business guy. we need the business guy? who better to fix this economy than a business guy. who knew that attention would turn not to th

the last highest was the famous ross perot-al gore nafta debate in 1990 -- it's in the books. anyway, what happened last night is poised to rewrite a race that's already made history. donald trump was front and center on the stage, quite literally the man in the middle. while much of this campaign has been about trump dishing it out last night, many tried to dish it back. we watched trump's head on a constant swivel turning left, turning right after he answered attack after attack after attack. cnn chief political correspondent dana bash was in the thick of it all with me last night. dana, we saw a lot of the candidates mixing it up with the front runner. >> that's right. look, there were a lot of ways that this debate was different from the first one. the most obvious was that there was an extra person on the stage, and she made her presence known. a standout moment for the only woman on stage saying so much without saying much at all. >> donald trump said the following about you, quote, look at that face. would anyone vote for that? can you imagine that the face of our next

he first of all would have to repeal nafta which would require bipartisan vote in the united states senate. a vote in the house of representatives. he would then have to get congress to pass a whole new law since a 35% tariff that he dreams about is not a presidential power. that's something only congress can impose. and so the challenge for debate moderators wednesday night will be trying to force donald trump out of that kind of realm of fantasy and force him to acknowledge at least some of the realities of actually governing. no one questioning trump has been able to do that yet. but wednesday night, will that be the night when the other candidates finally start fact checking the front-runner? joining us now sam stein, senior politics editor and white house correspondent for the huffington post. he's also an msnbc analyst. maria, president of vote of latino and host of "changing america" and david fromme, senior editor for "the atlantic." sam stein, the fairytales that donald trump tells in any one of those 45-minute speeches are so many and so long that the media has given up on them.

i think nafta ntpp is a joke personally and i think their people were much better particularly bilateralstrader or lead for -- bilateral. deals, we have been great. colombia, panama and south korea china has done 30 including a 30 billion-dollar deal with the ukraine including many of the countries and many people who'd never deal with. the answer to your question is iran i think it's a very dangerous precedent. i don't think we have nearly what we think we have this notion of anywhere anytime there's nothing that sounds close to anywhere anytime in the so that's my answer to that. >> peter it's a great talk, very disturbing listening to you. the world seems like there's so much to be done but as we all leave this room each individual, leave the library tonight what would you like us as individuals to take with us, can we do? >> a phenomenal question, thank you. the title of the book is "american mojo" lost and found. we have it. there is no more talented organization on the planet than we are. we are the destructors. anybody who thinks we don't have new jobs go out to silicon valley, go

possessed with all those who have been lying to me about immigration to say we need these trade deals like nafta. i never really thought the sine qua non-of being a conservative was making sure mark zuckerberg makes more money. >> with regards to the media because you are for reference that one of the criticism your the criticism there because god knows there is so much anecdotal evidence because as you stated stated -- because they don't exist but i did a little bit of research on the shooting that happened in san francisco and for the first two days the shooter was referred to only by his name. francesco sanchez of texas so i wanted to talk about how the media tends to treat the stories when they originally see them. >> thing about what happened in san francisco we did find out by hook or crook it was generally mentioned in the articles of texas man. he had been deported four times. in my extensive research i only found two other cases or two cases and now this one where we found out very early on that the illegal immigrants who killed an american was an illegal immigrant so the headline may h

me if i would play golf with president clinton and him to help discuss the president's position on nafta play golf, remember? but throughout my career i was lucky enough to make a few more birdies than the next guy. and because of that and for some other reasons i have an audience and people occasionally listen to me. that humbles me beyond words. it also provides me a window to show how amazing our game is at crossing borders, connecting cultures and bridging generations. five years ago this month i travelled to morocco for a trip to see how we can use the game of golf to enhance the tourism efforts of that country. i was to meet crown prince rasheed, and little did i know that, rather than a meeting, his royal highness instead had plans to play golf. here i was dressed in khakis, boat shoes and playing with a set of borrowed clubs. we played nine holes at a course called buznika. there was not a soul on the course and it was immaculately maintained. we had a wonderful round, and later that night we gathered at his palace. what i found out between the round and dinner truly moved me. th

but the big part of it is that thanks to these global trade agreements like nafta, american companies are are able to dump corn -- because we produce so much corn -- we're able to dump corn on the mexican market, and it becomes cheaper in mexico to buy that corn from the united states than from local farmers who are on their land. and so these local farmers can no longer be, can no longer farm in this globalized economy k. and this has happened for a variety of reasons. the green revolution, that input of technology that created vastly more productive crops in places like india and mexico where it's pioneer the 1960s, does a lot. it saves people from starvation. but it creates a high capital creative industry. unlike you plowing roads with your donkey, that's not going to be able to compete anymore with car gil, right? dumping corn on the market. so these people lose their ability to farm, and lo and behold, they become the migratory labor force for these factories that are moving to mexico because now these people need jobs. and so when people say, oh, you know, these people -- these

we talked about nafta and donald trump's pledge to break nafta if he were president. >> if i walked awayrom that it would have been devastating to mexico's economy. we would have had illegal immigrants coming into america. something mr. trump says he doesn't like and we would have literally despised by all of our neighbors south of the border and people would say america is running away from this. >> i also asked the former president about the controversy surrounding hillary clinton's e-mail use while she was secretary of state. >> what exactly does it matter? e-mails about which she has been transparent, disclosing, asked for more disclosure than she's gotten. how did this happen? the people telling them about it believe that's way more important than reminding them that this is the 8th committee to look into benghazi. this committee has been dribbling out information but won't let anybody testify in public. so the disclosure problems are not on her, they're on other people. >> as for hillary clinton's run for her party's nomination, here's what president clinton had to say about the id

[applause] you are looking at a senator and former congressman who has voted against nafta, permanenttrade relations with china and will help lead the opposition to this disastrous transpacific partnership. [applause] anyone who wants to take a hard look at the economy and anyone who wants to know how we rebuild the middle class, how we lower property rates, how we put people to work with decent paying jobs has got to take a hard look at wall street. wall street, as all of you know, through their greed, their recklessness, their illegal behavior, drove this country into the worst economic downturn since the great depression. millions of people are still feeling the impact of what wall street did. here's what's interesting. the congress, against my vote, voted to bail out wall street because they were "too big to fail." if they went down, half the economy would go with them. today three out of four of the largest financial institutions in america today are significantly larger than they were when we bailed them out because they were too big to fail. you have the six largest banks in th

eight degrees hayward 87919 fremont richmond currently 70 degrees in the north face one of three for nafta now for santa rosa and 91 degrees redwood city things cooler though all of us ever cisco peninsula. the law the national service lifted the heat advisory for that area but not so much for inland valley locations in the east bay shoreline heat advisory still affect the 7:00 p.m. tonight for those areas because of the stock of warm temperatures have lost by 8:00 p.m. got things down to 82 degrees for inland locations they should be 81 degrees cussed a comfortable 65 by 7:00 a.m. tomorrow morning when you wake up and temperatures and low 60s across the board finding time tomorrow we will have temperatures once again that cribbing up to the low 90s for in the allocations 86 for the east bay shoreline 78 for a long coast there the cool down temperatures cooling trend heading our way for the week and have three left leave the lot of people waiting for will come till saturday sunday one more day with mild form conditions cooling trend will continue to the weekend. >> pam: popular east bay yo

cnn's prior record was the nafta debate, al gore and ross perot debating nafta. this will top that. the candidate who have a great night. a real disadvantage to the candidates who have a bad night. >> that's true. >> they're in front of so many more eye balls than any primary debate. >> we'll be discussing this in the coming days with you, the man in the media, brian stelter. tune in tonight at 6:00 p.m. eastern, the main event kicking off with 11 candidates at 8:00 p.m. eastern. chris and alisyn, you guys are ready to go. >>> well, there's no question that the stakes are higher this time but you know what? the rules are different as well. when we come back, we'll tell you how jake will control the there are ways and methods that will make you get more out of it. we'll tell you about it, next. and everybody needs to do something about it now if they want to preserve their teeth. i recommend pronamel. it helps strengthen the tooth and makes it more resistant to acid breakdown. who knows, one of these kids just might be the one. to clean the oceans, to start a movement, or lead a coun

no, we are not going to continue to have disastrous trade fta.cies like nafta, cal corporations shutting down plants in vermont, new hampshire, and traveling to other countries, and bringing their products back. we need to policies that create jobs in america, not just china. [applause] and, by the way, that means that together, we are going to defeat this disastrous transpacific partnership. [applause] we need a political movement which tells wall street that when a bank is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. [applause] i understand the power of wall street. i really do. i have stood up to them for a very long time. but, whether they like it or not, we will reinstate glass-steagall. [applause] and, we will create a financial makem whose job it is to affordable loans to small and medium-sized physicists so we can create jobs in america, not a financial system as it currently exists, which is an island onto itself only concerned about their profits. off theoing to break major financial institutions on wall street. [applause] when we talk about the economy, all of you know that throug

he talks a good game but he has done everything his power to stop under nafta to yvette and measure theon going into the environment and that is his track record. we will apply the legislation fair and equal and canadians know we will stop leaving the massive ecological debt to the future generations. >> you asked about cost but only do we move forward with pricing of carbon in a responsible way is committed to investing $20 billion over 10 years of green infrastructure. it is investing in kreme jobs to make sure to the renewable energy we need to their resources to market it is a fundamental responsibility but in order to do that to move an irresponsible way with the future really think to our kids. >> what we're not doing is imposing cost we are in a fragile global economy. we hear the same old story that says we will fix says with a platform yesterday for the energy and mining sector this is the same story we have to fix problems for raising taxes now when no trades people better getting layoffs because employers are paying higher taxes. >> mr. mulcair? >> but by tens of billions of

neil: if she takes too strong a stance, she's repudiating her husband's deals, nafta in a box. >> she hasn't by distancing herself by her husband's legislation that he fought for, and i think the key thing here is that if she were to take a stand on some of these issues that i think trumka and labor is upset about. she would gain 13 million votes of the labor community of the afl-cio. that has to be something weighing on her mind. neil: indeed it is. thank you very much, francesca. good seeing you. >>> those of you laughing at donald trump rivaling in the race. do not take him lightly. joe piscopo, an icon in the state of new jersey, comedic legend, great radio talk show host. one of the things you said now and echo now is the proof might be in how trump operates. no sooner does bush put out an attack ad, he responds within nanoseconds of an attack on his own. he's good. >> he has a structure, donald does. neil: you called him donald. mr. trump? >> no, no, donald. you know how i can tell you, the listeners on the, a love, love, love him. neil: they do. >> and when his daughter came ou