the naivete you discuss? >> well, i think that's part of the it. i think he has managed in so many different ways to be ineffective when he responds, to draw the red line in the sand and then never respond to it to make threats and never act. it's reached the point where i think around the world people, other leaders see him as weak and ineffective. we've seen it in terms of putin's actions in krim kcrimea ukraine. we see what china's doing in the south china sea. there's no question he's viewed as perhaps the weakest president of my lifetime and he doesn't have a clue about what needs to be done. and he is viscerally opposed to the use of military force. we have a bipartisan agreement, consensus if you will, republican and democrat, since the end of world war ii that the world's a safer place when the united states is actively and aggressively leading, when we have a strong military and we provide the kind of leadership that the world needs to deal with these crises. barack obama doesn't believe that. he's the first in a chain of presidents going

more space and media mentioned have boosted interest next slide when the l lp was first available in naivete there was a flurry of activity between 2011 and 12 we've had a whole bunch of applications then it slowed down we depends on if everyone who wanted an l l that got one but we've had a lot of audition action from the mayor's office of housing of department of workforce development one problem is that there are certain areas of the city that can't get an l lp this map is ridiculous but i couldn't find one that would tell you (laughter) cut me slack i'm sick basically, the service light industry residential that didn't make it onto the power point the l l x different acronyms are the areas you can't have an l lp it's unfortunate because there are a lot of places that would be perfect places for entertainment you'll see a beautiful picture of the fulsome street fourteenth foundry and the owners do a lot of work but they're under 9 y m g their unable to have a party that's unfortunate but the upside is we have challenges with the l lp programs most of the restaurants and cafes don't have t

in a stunning burst of naÏvetÉ, the general assembly acclaimed that this law was designed "to reconcilell the good people of this commonwealth." [laughter] reconciliation did not have the chance of a snowball in hell. for the next century and a half, as evangelical protestantism becomes the dominant religious force, virginians wrangled over numerous church-state issues. how free was the church? a body of believers, in civil society. how free was the church? could it hold property? intent on absolute separation of church and state, the legislature interpreted the statute to forbid the legal incorporation of churches and church sponsored institutions. with numerous consequences that the legislature had not really thought through. so, for example -- here in richmond, joseph gallego of gallego mills died and left a bequest to the local catholic community to build a church. when he made the bequest in his will, the virginia court voided the bequest on the ground that while the request had been made, known law toentity receive the bequest. for a church to hold property without elaborate subte

>> great naÏvetÉ. it took five years and 2,400 pages. >> doesn't it weigh -- >> 40 pounds. statistic is in one copy there is four pounds of ink. >> but he is not satisfied. his team is now testing a stack of secret recipes, including savory fudge and modernist take on macaroons -- all hints that his next book may be on desserts. >> normally you might not use liquid nitrogen, but we do. >> it is not just his cooking style that is scientific. he uses ingredients more commonly found in the lab. >> it is 321 degrees below zero fahrenheit. never do this. never. this is a bad idea. or play with it. >> now i really want to do it. >> go ahead. >> it is really cold. how does one come across liquid nitrogen and use it in one's kitchen? >> it costs less than bottled water, believe it or not. >> what has been the reception of the traditional foodies? are they welcoming this technology? >> some say cooking should be about soul and art and get this liquid nitrogen out of here. but then you put baking soda and baking powder in your muffins, and that is a pretty technical thing. >> not as

there's a lot of naÏvetÉ there. hope as governments go ahead with the europeans in terms of working out how to deal with these young men both in their communities, when they are coming home, when they might be leaving, that they try to keep in mind two things. all, in many cases, these are fragile young man who are extremely psychologically vulnerable to the type of ease and simplicity of the isis message and therefore, i think we need to look a lot at the radicalization and that is a process. simply taking away everybody's passports is not necessarily going to be the answer going ahead here. that isr thing important to take into consideration, i interviewed foughtung european who jihad for two years in syria and ultimately he decided to leave because he was so horrified by what isys was doing he went to fight the regime and to defend the syrian people when he saw they were killing other muslims, other islamists, for him he had this revelation where he said he could not be a part of it. to paradise and then go to he

and i was so inspired by your naivete.d your determination to make a difference in the lives of these kids. and so, over these years, what has been, if you, i were to say, tell me, your biggest surprise? >> there are still district leaders who want to shut down donorschoose d.o.t.org because they don't like idea of teachers getting funding for books that they might not have approved of or going on field trips that deviate from the mandated curriculum, getting any resource they're not personally authorizing and controlling. this began first year operating outs of my classroom in the bronx and another teacher in the bronx got funding for a field trip to go up the hudson river on clearwater vessel. gotten oceanography training summer before. would take the students fishing, testing, taking water samples, learning about the hudson river ecology. students signed off, parents signed off. principal signed off. when the district administrator heard the it was funded through the our site and told the bus driver to turn around at go

course on cell or islamic state and desires to strike out at the west is nonsense and a level of naiveteould be stunning. again, we seem, if that's the case, turn around and say we eliminated that immediate threat from an al qaeda element, and so we're going to pull back and stop and reassess, that would be extremely disappointing. all we're doing is trying to find a way to contain the islamic state and put our hands up and say look, we're fine with an extremist state. melissa: what do we do to combat the strike? what's the smartist thing to combat the threat and launching an attack here in the u.s.? >> we've got to accept the premise that the time to strike these guys is not the day before they strike us. the time to strike is soon they ideaate that intention. as soon as they say we're going to strike the united states, that is justification to go after these guys. any of these guys from north america, canada, training with isis and coming back. their citizenship should be revoked. we should not allow them that level of access to the islamic state. melissa: we have to leave it there. ge

. >> unprecedented naivete and ideology. that moves the president in this direction.a very complex situation much we've got an enemy in isis that we should strangle before it becomes a more pressing threat. we have an enemy in iran that is very close to nuclear weapons. we have to deal with both simultaneously. lou: look, i respect your knowledge, your experience, your intellect. so tell me this. how is it that the islamic state is greater threat to the united states than it is to our arab allies who refuse to join the coalition apparently, to kill the islamic state terrorists? >> i think it's a threat to them and more imminently than it is to us. in fact that is what al qaeda's propaganda is now. isis is more of a threat to the arab regime. i think they are reluctant to join because they see president obama doesn't really have his heart in his objective which he says is to destroy isis. so i think they're hedging their bets. i think that is a big mistake for them. but the fact they haven't come forward with more concrete participation in the coalition is because they

so maybe a little bit of political naÏvetÉ might help. >> please identify yourself. >> i am frank manheimon university. i would like to get to the personal income tax because that seems to be the critical barrier and it appears that just as the corporate taxes is an extreme tax in terms of other country or personal income tax may be the same thing. what i haven't seen done is an analysis of where the income of the highest tax brackets goes. the administration seems to talk in moral terms. it's not fair. people should pay their fair share of taxes but if you look at the income of high earners it has been established that of a lot of it goes to expenses and of course a major portion to investments much of which may be trading income rather than wealth building investments in plant and labor and so on. so i'm wondering if we don't need an in-depth accurate survey of where the money goes as you go up the tax bracket. >> that's a really interesting question and i would first of all refer you and you may know about the survey of consumer finances aspires to be this the survey you are describing

his overall record is looking lg more and more like a case study in the perils of weaknesses, naivete and indecision. i can only hope that recent events will force him to change course. understand that could start by -- and that could start by him coming to congress with a strategy to eliminate isis, to eliminate this threat. i believe there would be bipartisan support for a strategy that the president would present that has a reasonable chance of success. but just to have an open-ended airstrikes and maybe just a strategy being either your hopes and dreams but not something with the likelihood of working, that's not good enough. but if he came with us and worked with congress, i think would serve multiple purposes. first, it would comply with the constitution and the laws of the united states. that's important. secondly, by engaging in bipartisan support in congress, he would build support necessarily for this policy among the american people. and i don't believe americans should ever go to war without the support of the american people. we see what happens when that support fades an