inequality, and in principle , war is a very unfair thing. secondly, with all due respect to colleague natalukhis is not a matter for the parliament. and any desire, as you called it, of higher echelons of power, which, as i understand it, are slightly higher than the verkhovna rada in a parliamentary-presidential republic. to throw this issue as unpopular to parliament is wrong because any voting mechanism, as you heard from my colleagues, this is the prerogative of the cabinet of ministers, at least two resolutions of the government will calmly decide this, again, they can come up with any criterion, i am not you, i am a big fan of economic defense, banal because i simply do not imagine how we can explain it to people. but again, that's not my question, that's the government's question, they have all the authority and all the leverage to solve this, why are they talking about it and not doing it, well i don't have a cultural answer here in the slightest, why can't you come out to society and say: no wait, that won't happen, it's untrue and so on, i don't understand either, that's the worst si

principle, war - this is a very unfair thing, and secondly, with all due respect to my colleague natalukhbut this is not a question of the parliament, and any desire, as you called it, of the higher echelons of power, which, as i understand it, is slightly higher than the verkhovna rada, in parliamentary-presidential... republic to transfer this issue to the parliament as an unpopular one is wrong, because any reservation mechanism that you have heard colleagues is the prerogative of the cabinet of ministers, at least two resolutions of the government will solve it calmly, once again they can come up with any criterion, i you're not a big fan of economy booking, cheesy because i just can't imagine how we can explain it to people. but again, that's not my issue, that's the government's issue, they have all the authority and all the leverage to resolve this, why would they they talk about it and don't do it, well, i don't have a less cultural answer here, why can't you go out to society and say, don't wait, it won't happen, it's not true and so on, i don't understand either, that's the wors

basically war is that a very ... unfair thing, and secondly, with all due respect to my colleague natalukht this is not a matter for parliament, and any desire, as you called it, of the higher echelons of power, which i understand is slightly higher than the verkhovna rada in a parliamentary-presidential republic, it is wrong to transfer this issue to the parliament as an unpopular one, because any mechanism for election. colleagues, this is the prerogative of the cabinet, at least two government decrees will calmly decide this, again, they can come up with any criterion, i am not a big fan of you economic reservation, trite because i just don't see how we can explain it to people, but again, it's not my problem, it's the government's problem, they have all the power and all the leverage to solve it. why do they talk about it and not do it? well, i don't have a cultural answer here either. i also don't understand why you can't go out to society and say: don't wait, it won't happen, it's not true and so on. this is the worst situation when everyone learns about it from rbc, if i'm not mista

ukrainian business, i can tell you... what i can tell you for sure, this is not the initiative of natalukh, whom i mentioned, he is promoting it by the way, it is not the initiative of the cabinet of ministers, there is what they have there , unfortunately, others interests, it is an initiative of ukrainian business, it promotes ukrainian business, which is currently suffering from the fact that he is being recruited and this business is collapsing, and the people who are in the shadows, but you don't mobilize them and they don't pay taxes, that's the problem, not the desire to intercept some kind of corruption. i do not agree with this. zelenskyi, being in germany these days, also spoke about mobilization at the meeting with scholz, he said that he was answering the question, will ukraine be able to mobilize a sufficient number of people to liberate the occupied territories? let's listen to what the president of ukraine said. as for mobilization, i am absolutely sober about it i am watching because the mobilization in our country is going on because of the state of martial law, because of

and... in principle , war is a very unfair thing, secondly, with all due respect to my colleague natalukhthis is not a matter for parliament, and any desire, as you called it, of the higher echelons of power, which, as i understand it, are slightly higher than the verkhovna rada in a parliamentary-presidential republic, it is wrong to transfer this issue to the parliament as an unpopular one, because any mechanism... of the cabinet of ministers, as at least two government decrees decide this calmly, again, they can come up with any criterion. i'm not you're a big fan of economic choice, trite because i just don't see how we can explain it to people, but again, that's not my issue, that's the government's issue, they have all the powers and all the leverage in the. .. in order to solve this, why do they talk about it and not do it, well, i don’t have a cultural answer here, at least, why you can’t go out to society and say: don’t wait, it won’t happen, it’s not true and something else, neither i understand, the worst situation is when everyone learns about it from rbc, if i'm not mistaken,