for the whole the world today in terms of public procurement because before it was full corruption, then the national anti-corruption bureau was created, the highest anti-corruption court, the national agency for the preventionf corruption, that is, the foundations were laid, banking was excluded the system was put in order in the state budget and it moved little by little. i am convinced that now we have received on the one hand the biggest historical drama for ukraine, this is the war, and on the other hand the biggest historical chance for ukraine to build a new ukraine. i am sure that we will take advantage of this chance. i am sure that we will win this war, i am sure that we will build a competitive economy, i am sure that the time will come when ukraine will become a member of the european union and nato, and this means that there cannot be other standards of other approaches than there in ukraine, this means that we will become members of the club of the strongest today we are the leaders of the strongest, leaders among the strongest in terms of our struggle for our independence, but tomorrow after victory will be no less difficult than today's tomorrow to build a new country and we will definitely d

constantly invents some kind of work for himself, but please monitor the way of life of high-ranking officials. this is the direct duty of the national agency for the prevention of corruptionve to answer whether he has enough money honestly earned to lead such a lifestyle. this is the first. and the second is about the investigation into journalists. this is absolutely nonsense, because i, as a person who in the past had i know happiness. is it not happiness to work as a member of the kyiv city council for three years? in the reception rooms , regulations were adopted about the video surveillance system of the city of kyiv. i tried in every way to correct it, but then the majority voted what they voted, and the key conclusion from this is that according to the normative documents of the city of kyiv, access to the information of the video surveillance system has just a huge bunch of individuals and organizations, that is , it is not some kind of closed information that only the police or some specially trained people have access to people, no, this is a huge access network that is legalized, i always said that it is wrong, because in fact the surveillance system of video s

this the decision of the yavorivskyi district court of lviv, which was on the seventh of december, yes. i will remind you a little of the background. the national agency for the prevention of corruptionused you there of the fact that your wife crossed the border in a car that was supposed to serve the city council, or a driver who worked for the city council and crossed the border the very border that transported your wife . let's start with the fact that now you are fulfilling your duties even before the appeal. in civilized countries, the decision of the first instance until there is no appeal decision is not mandatory, that is, i work as a mayor and i would like to have a conversation not about the decision of the yavoriv court, but really this is a very dangerous president because the next decision will be chernihivskyi’s decision to remove sadov from office or some other mayor. this is absolutely, even from the point of view of law , we have such a loud president. i exercise authority in the city of chernihiv according to none grounds e-e conducts i don't see a court session in the yavorivskyi judge or in any other, and lawyers and lawyers are considered a serious mistake , but

important due to the appointment of the director of the nabu, and of course it is necessary to talk a little separately about the activities of the national agency for the prevention of corruptionerstand that now it is a bit sad to live in this life, because due to the martial law, the submission of party reports is frozen, all subjects of declaration have the right not to submit declarations, and i think that this is very correct solution, because i will remind you that there are a million subjects of declaration in ukraine, of which a huge number are women. i am sure that a huge number of them are currently abroad solving a thousand of some daily complex issues and now burdening them with declaration issues would be, as they say, still inappropriate , therefore, of course, it is not currently burdened and is looking for entertainment, for example, in the fight against russian assets. i think that this is very wrong, because it is definitely not their responsibility and is not an area of ​​their interest, it should be done by the ministry of justice uh, our defense security council is the ukrainian courts, but less so, uh, despite the situational shortcomings, the system is de

for bringing the developer to justice, it is written there that he will have some fines, but how will they come if there is a principle of tacit consent, the national agency for the prevention of corruption also concluded that the law creates many corruption threats and it needs to be finalized in the ministry of infrastructure, which takes care of the document. - for any similar violations, the owners of such entities will not be held liable by monetary fines with their own property and the right to work in this market, the same applies and cultural heritage, as well as objects with a high level of risk will be constantly monitored, and access to the construction market will be available to all companies that have a full package of permits , private inspectors will not have the right to have joint owners with developers and will be obliged to insure potential damage from the development of the city instead receive new control functions, people's deputy olena shulyak claims that after the project is approved, local authorities will have all the necessary tools to counter chaotic construction and illegal construction up to the dismantling of illegal objects without a court decision, this

the court of lviv ravarivskyi, which was on the seventh. the decision was on december 7. yes, i will remind you a little of the background. the national agency for the prevention of corruption you there of the fact that your wife crossed the border in a car that had serve the city council or the driver who worked for the city council and crossed this same border who transported your wife. let 's start with the fact that you are now fulfilling your duties regarding the appeal. the same in all civilized countries, the decision of the first instance until there is no appeal decision is not mandatory , that is, i work as a mayor and i would like to have a conversation not about the decision of the yavorivsky court, but really a very dangerous president because the next decision is the decision of the chernihiv court regarding the removal of the judge from office or some other mayor, it is absolutely we, even from the point of view of law, we have such a blatant president, i exercise my powers in the city according to chernihiv , i don’t see any reason to conduct a court hearing in yavorivskyi court or any other, and pravda lawyers are considered a serious mistake, but the quest

for a year. the court made this decision because the mayor of chernihiv in august of this year instructed his driver to take his car abroad the wife of the national agency for the prevention of corruptione a driver can serve the mayor only within the scope of his official duties. in addition, according to the dbr, his wife crossed the ukrainian-polish border at the wheel of the mayor's official car and used it for three months, vladyslav troshenko himself considers the cases against him to be political persecution from bankova street, that is, from the office of the president vladyslav troshenko joins our broadcast good evening good evening studio good evening ukraine you know i didn't even know how to introduce you kyiv mayor of chernihiv but i don't know because of the decision of the court above whether you remain the mayor of chernihiv or not legally unconditionally yes, this is the decision of the first instance and it is obvious - for all the lawyers who analyzed the decision, it is not just, it is unjust, actually, let's first agree with the against, regarding you, it was the prevention of corruption that your used your driver, so to speak, in your own interests and not in the i

that the anti-corruption court was created only in 2019 , although they started talking about its creation back in 2016. artem sytnyk is now the deputy head of the nation. the agency for the prevention of corruption is another link in the system of anti-corruption bodies of the nazk. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office supervises the observance of laws during operative and investigative activities prior to the judicial investigation, all these bodies created over the past seven years, and all of them have helped ukraine reduce the level of corruption, says the deputy executive director of transparents international ukraine, kateryna ryzhenko, in 2012, out of 21, ukraine received +6 points in 10 years, we have finally started to see verdicts on specific llcs, officials are also working, nabu works alone other bodies are working and they are already showing their results. that is, it is not just the initial stage, it is already the e-th stage of the work of these bodies when it is possible to draw conclusions about their effectiveness, the main task the expert believes that the future head of nabu needs to improve cooperation with other anti-corruption bodies. were alr

for bringing the developer to justice, it is written there that he will have some fines, but how will they come if there is a principle of tacit consent, the national agency and the prevention of corruptionhe law creates a lot of corruption threats and it needs to be finalized in the ministry of infrastructure, which takes care of the document, they say the comments from the nazk were taken into account, and the criticisms of the opponents are considered exaggerated; the law provides for strict liability