special review board to conduct a comprehensive review of the role and procedures of the national security council staff in the conduct of foreign and national security policy. i anticipate receiving the reports from the attorney general and the special review board at the earliest possible date upon the completion of these reports. and i will share their findings and conclusions with the congress and the american people. although not directly involved, vice admiral john poindexter has asked to be relieved of his assignment as assistant to the president for national security affairs and to return to another assignment, the navy lieutenant colonel oliver north has been relieved of his duties on the national security council staff. i am deeply troubled that the implementation of a policy aimed at resolving a truly tragic situation in the middle east has resulted in such controversy. as i've stated previously, i believe our policy goals toward iran were well founded. however, the information brought to my attention yesterday convinced me that in one aspect, implementation of that policy was seriously

karine: i just mentioned that brett mcgirk will be holding a national security council, is holding up a call, i think that's going to be really important. they will talk more about the implementation of this. national security adviser jake sullivan was just here two days ago on monday. and i think kind of laid out a really good framework for all of this the thinking process, how it was going to move forward. brett mcgirk is on the ground. he has all of the information, he has been there at the direction of the president. certainly with national security adviser jake sullivan leading that effort. and so he's going to have a lot more information than any of us here. will have. because he's been on the ground. understanding, working with the negotiators and understanding how this process has worked. so that's how this works. >> you said that you wish your successor luck. have you had any extensive conversations with her? about this job? karine: i haven't. but i'm not -- i'm not the only white house press secretary or soon to be former white house press secretary out there. i'm sure there

this is not his field. foreign policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state but not with foreign policy. and not with security. how's the good call? stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues, the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner. after this break, the people who are disgusted with what's going on with that, sending huge amounts of money into the lensky in terms of weapons, tequila russians. we're actually, we're taking money away from people that have been one of the big things in the tell you that i know about domestically. is that doing covering labor government have taken one and a half 1000000000 pounds away from the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us. decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based complex for him. house during part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy

this is not his field for him policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme the national security council under the supremely, that the supreme leader makes the last decision most the press since he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but not with foreign policy and off with security as the good cause, stop you about more from the former advisor on me least issues. the foreign policy chief ivy is longer up those right the, the insulating people are disgusted with what's going on with that. sending huge amounts of money to the lensky in terms of weapons to kill russians when actually, we're taking money away from people that hadn't been one of the big things in the tell you that i never about domestically is that the color labor government have taken one and a half 1000000000 pounds away from the the plug it back to going undergoing. i'm still here with us. decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based complex for him. house during part one, you were talking to me about the desk and not having a foreign policy control in the

this is not his field for him policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but know with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief obvious loaner. after this break, the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based conflicts for him. how starting part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in iran? i mean arguably, i mean i lived in tyrone. he does have power to resign at any rate, but as regards and i should also add as regards to what he wrote chest, so it goes to the side of the national security of his teachers as a true. so maybe he will have a choice. i don't know, but there's a lot of, i mean it's a very lead scroll to issue, but i just wonder on

the policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent . he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but know with foreign policy and off with security as the group. i'll stop you back more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner after this break. the other of many places in the world where you can say your, on the divide between the 2 oceans and what you might not think kids, what does this, hey, and what is northern or found your vision? and the, you know, is that us national park and today's, we know the was a stuff was from taking a deep side interest because the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based conflicts for him. how starting part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in there on. i mean, arguably, i mean i lived in terra and he does have

this is not his field for him, the policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council. and does a supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press stuff. he's basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but not with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues, the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner. after this break the the us near doing the, the leads, told him the articles and you might, it's a city of the news release to me. i don't see them, but you, me for the stuff. you know, probably my you can see in the united. so that's literally ridiculous. this is yeah . kind of shows live with the board meeting stage of this list of most of the details to, to make a cosigner. but i would just take one of those same and use the link to the stores at the store to, to $24.00. would need to even, and 0, it's a good key and our phone yet. so that's the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and fou

this is not his field. foreign policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under those supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state but know with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner after the spring, the, as the year ends being coming from administration continues to believe it can in the conflict in ukraine from pen is people are beginning to understand. and in this conflict is more difficult in starting a war. the problem is moscow cube and washington wants different outcomes, the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and coming director of the baby based complex for him . how starting part one you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in iran? i mean, arguably, i mean i lived in tyrone he does have power to resign a

because then the, then jake sullivan of the national security council. the in the united states doesn't look so stupid. mode is blinking, then your playing mazda strokes here, bringing the u. s, which always wanted to get involved because clearly the us were involved in terms of the reaction to iran's retaliation using the destroys in the, in the red sea. and they're prepared for it. they going forward, this was the plan all alone. it wasn't. i mean, i'm not, you only can say that about ukraine work that heavy. the dictators are lensky is losing, but this is the plan to exterminate god. well, i think it's higher. so i think for as for, for a long time, i mean the plan about garza and the pon about the west bank. and of course, destroying this bullet has been loading about for a long time. it is deeply entrenched in the israeli policy, and of course, netanyahu came to congress and related to ross very clearly. he said in vice here to america, to a war games get wrong. so you, if you like the head of the octopus. uh that is strangling in israel and he said

which was released in 1950, it was orchestrated by the state and then sort of newly formed national security council. but they said we were fundamentally to reassess our national security in the whole big picture of american security, foreign policy and national and the entirety of u.s. grand strategy, essentially. and he said that during the drafting of nsc 68 at that time, the pillars of our postwar foreign policy were failing. so basically we were in a moment we're having emerged victorious from the world war. we were nonetheless losing the entire for what really do we do with the post-cold war, with the post-world two moment, with the early cold war? and then, you know, if you zoom very out, nixon, his colleagues came together and put together a us grand strategy that arguably set us up to win the long cold war and later was, as reagan saw it, set up, the first principles that we ultimately use for victory and contribue therefore to two enormous american success in the toughest contests we've had so if we're now in an era where those at hudson believe we're facing something like a new cold war,

>> that is exactly what the national security council is therefore. they have to make a key and imperative. i don't know if you all have seen the chinese robots, they are incredible. they will approve or insulate the world in a few years and china will potentially win the ai race. we are at the cusp of winning or losing everything because if you will really be everything. so the national security council needs to bring technical experts from the outside and agency experts to figure out how does each agency reads together its authority into a comprehensive, expedient ai strategy? >> congressman vera, we are talking about the first 100 days of the trump administration. one thing the president has promised to do is the executive order which set up the u.s. ai institute that had directives for agencies to cultivate a key-focused policies. if that is scrapped, as soon as a week from now, what are the implications for national security? >> i don't think it's a great idea. or if it is scrapped, what replaces it. you have national security but then you have a

the united nations security council has abandoned its commitment to peace. if you are a powerful nation with a permanent member and you have the right to veto, you can do almost anything. the security council will not condemn you. i think the united states has sent armed troops to about 30 countries to fight under the approval of the united nations since the second world war. other countries can do the same thing, if they are powerful enough. i wrote an op-ed for the "new york times" two years ago that showed the u.s. is now violating 10 of the 30 paragraphs in the universal declaration of human rights. a lot of those related to the discrimination against women, supposed to be equal, not just blacks being equal to whites and so forth. i think we have a long way to go still. we need to reassess the basic purpose of the united nations to be about peace, not conflict to resolve issues, and recommit ourselves to the basic principles of human rights. and i would urge all of you to just google universal declaration of human rights. if you have a couple of minutes,

he is a former national security council and pentagon staff are . in addition to serving as a public defender in florida. in 2024 he was one of the featured speakers at the conservative political action conferenceheld in the washington dc area . >> ladies and gentlemen, please welcome former pentagon chief ofstaff and author of government gangsters , kash patel. [music] >> how's it going? thank you. so i thought it would be fun to go on a man c of government gangsters together and i'm so proud to be at ccac with so many great americans who represent donald trump's army to take this country back and that's what is going to take, an entire army and we all have a job to do . we are blessed by god to ighave donald trump be our juggernaut of justice, to be our leader, to be our continued warrior in the arena but we have to fill that arena with americans behind him are going to take the fight to the mainstream media, who are going to take the fight to the corporate iz bureaucracy that controls the ou swap . were going to take the fight to the defense indu

have times for it the idea that the entire international institutions, like united nations, like the security council, which is the parts of the united nations that have failed. because that is this idea that the big countries, the permanent members, for example, all the security council can do what they wish. but they try and impose that will on smaller countries that are looking at them and just saying, well actually you don't do so we can do we want. well, i mean, as you know, as you're suggesting, we have to take a to look at this in terms of a historical perspective. so if you think of the past 70 is also 80, is since the end of the, the 2nd world war and compare that to the, into war period between the 1st and 2nd of all was what you see is that there was an effort after the 1st world war to create a world order which essentially collapsed within about 12 or 13 years. right? so then, a revised effort was made with a lot of the same principles, but different operating methods. and the idea of the security council, the permanent members at fountains, insistence upon the members for the have a vet

>> peter: i a lot of that going through the national security council and getting farewell emails of ople's contact information. a lot of phonings from the national security council have already left the building. so the folks that are going to stay that are part of the permanent apparatus would be the ones who are in there probably right now with some of the moving truck that's might have seen in the background over the last couple days. and they are saying okay, you can take this. >> brian: good. >> peter: these have to be screened. these can go to the future biden senator at the university of delaware. this is the batch that can go next to the corvette. it needs an oil change by the way. >> brian: i hope so. >> steve: peter, you actually got the president to admit that he had those papers next to the corvette. >> peter: it was probably my best guess in four years here. i just -- they said there was something in the garage and i had seen a picture one time of a corvette in the garage and i asked him about it and the rest is history. no charges though. [laughter] >> lawrence: thanks,

the national security council. [cheering and applauding] >> thank you for being here.ften hear -- sorry. democracy versus constitutional republic referred to as a democracy. why not prosecution republic, what is the difference? >> thank you. democracy ruled putting the minority and present. next question. over here. >> i would like to ask if you agree or disagree. the attempted assassination of donald trump was conspiracy disguised as incompetence in my opinion. >> thank you. i have no evidence it was a conspiracy. he did say its failure by design but we will get to the bottom of it. kash patel -- dan bongino. get off your radio take over the secret service. [cheering and applauding] >> my name is mike carey and president valley. my main question is, now that we are about ready to take over this country, are we going to get rid of the ccp? >> we can't get rid of the ccp unless you want a war with china. it is a competitor to the united states. president trump understands peter navarro will finally take it serious again. we will protect our interests. thank you. >> this

i would have to revere you to our national security council on that question. reporter: meta also eliminated its dei program in hiring, training, seeking suppliers citing the supreme court ruling on affirmative action. the administration really went out of its way to convince businesses not to interpret that rolling. sec. jean-pierre: i am not going to comment on a specific action a private company takes. but i can say, you have heard from this president and administration diversity is our greatest strength. you have seen this not just by awards, but action that the president has taken. certainly, it is a sentiment you have heard echoed by leaders across businesses and government, not just us. it continues to be our stance. it is important to have different voices around the table. it is important to have different voices working on policy and make sure we are delivering for the american people. that is what we have done. that is what we have shown. as it relates to specific companies i won't comment on that policy. but i think that by our actions over the last

funeral on january 9th and of course, the inauguration on january. 20th, we're on a call with national security councilpokesperson john kirby about the upcoming inauguration following the events in new orleans and las vegas. he said he didn't want to get into specific force protection measures but said the security of the inauguration and of people attending it remain a high priority for all of us. take a listen. >> i think it's also safe to say without getting into specific force protection measures about their dog around the inauguration. but that the security of the inauguration and those people attending it remain high priority for all of us and the executive branch and the and we're working assiduously every single day. to ensure the safety and security of the inauguration from any kind of of attack. >> and kirby also says that they are keeping the trump team in the loop as of any updates or any aspects as they head into inauguration. >> on the eve of the 4th anniversary of the attack on the capitol, lawmakers are bracing for president elect trump's promise pardons. trump has said he will pardon m

the security council list, the security council, the security council is finding but other member states, united nations, have to intervene now. because what we are seeing is clearly an unfolding genocide when say you talked about the coalition of the willing, which countries might that may comp as well. i think there are a lot of countries in europe. there are a lot of countries in the south america from africa. we've seen countries like priscilla like south africa, the nordic countries, island, spain, belgium. these countries have got to make it very clear that the kid, the intention, is to get to monitoring aid into gaza, to feed and protect civilians, to make sure the hospitals and shelves has a safe places. and they must have access and they will send, they need to send these convoys, militarized convoys, and beat these valleys and other other games. who might choose to try and attack these convoys need to be towed in quite unequivocally, that if they are attacked by will be returned. mach 7, joining us from have it in the u. k. many, thanks, mark. thank you the, the foreign, but it says it from, f

a member of reagan's national security council's and a major soviet scholar, richard pipes, cogently explained to the audience problem that reagan faced in europe as the english elite regarded reagan as a dangerous simpleton simpleton. the anti-gay fear of nuclear war was a major problem for reagan. the united states as well. michael barone mouthed it in the washington post and a great many americans and europeans believe that reagan is significantly more likely in his predecessors to get us into a nuclear war. a washington post poll found that by a 3 to 1 margin, american people supported a nuclear. what that what we have not nuclear weapons but what a frozen nowhere they. and it might sound like a good idea but reagan's whole approach was to build up to create leverage for arms reductions. so reagan faced a really big problem in the united states. a washington post abc poll, the same poll found that a significant portion of the american public has become in increasingly anxious over the prospect of a nuclear war. frightened over the buildup of the arsenal. and frustrated the lack o

senior director for counter terrorism in the national security council. [ cheering ] >> thank you. jowski thank you for being here. i'm rick love. my question is -- i often hear even from conservative plat for the purposes that we are -- well, i hear that our -- sorry. >> question! >> there's feedback. sorry. knock seizure disorders versus -- democracy versus constitutional re-pup lick. we're always referred to as a democracy. why not constitutional republic? what is the difference for all of us and -- >> would you agree or disagree. attempted assassination was a conspiracy disguised as incompetence in my opinion. butte too incompetent? thank you. i have evidence it was a conspiracy. the most chatable thing to say it was failure by design. failure by design but we will get to the bottom of it. kash patel, pam bondi and dan bongino. get off your radio mic and take over the secret service. >> thank you. my main question is now that we are about ready to take over the countryo again, are we getting rid of the ccp because they have -- >> we can't get rid of the ccp unless you want war

for the i c j through the united nations for the security council. all of this can be used to build something that will hopefully bank a permanent stop to what these really government is doing in the both right now, maybe we aren't seeing it's effects as, as strong as the, as it needs to be. this means that all of us, you know everything, everyone around the world needs to continue to do whatever they're doing. these things take time. however, i think that slowly, the palestinians auto building a strong case towards achieving the freedom in the us on the west bank. and of course, the situation in gaza and indeed in the occupied westbank is, is getting worse west and west by the day. what about a, tell us about that and how it gets in and, and how much is needed and how much is stopped by israel. so right now those rallies are only letting in that on 20 percent. a 4th normally comes in into the south and central. the reason and 5 percent will fuck normally comes in into the north. 8th comes in through 2 ways. either the charities approved by the is re

multiple house democrat witnesses including those from the department of state, national security council, and others, testified that there was a potential appearance of a conflict of interest. these were their witnesses. >> how much money did hunter biden get for being on the board? well, you start looking at bank records according to reports between april 2014, and october of 2015 burisma paid more than 3.1 million to devon archer, and hunter biden. that is over the course of a year and a' half. how do we know this? some of devon archer's bank records were disclosed during an unrelated federal criminal case having nothing to do with hunter biden. these bank records show 17 months that burisma wired 2 payments of 83333 dollars not just for one month, but for two months for 17 months. according to reuters, sources report that of two payments of 83 thousand, each, one was for hunter biden, one was for devon archer. hunter biden was paid more than board members for major u.s. fortune 100 companies. such as goldman sachs, comcast, citi group. the typical board member of these fortune 100 com

but just explain who these people are that the ap is reporting on. >> yeah, i mean, so the national security councilunction for all foreign and national security policies, is actually comprised of a majority of career officials. so what does this mean? it means that when somebody wins, they usually bring in the senior members of that body the national security advisor, the deputy security advisor, the people leading responsibility for different policies. >> but most of the people that work at the nsc, they're career foreign service officers, they're career military officers, they're career intelligence professionals who are detailed, they're essentially loaned from their home agency to the national security council for periods of 1 or 2 years. and so when i came in in 2009, we had a lot of people from the bush nsc who stayed on. >> that was critical because those people knew what was happening. >> they knew what was going on in the world, in different regions, on different issues. >> same thing happened when trump came in. same thing happened when biden came in. it would completely reorient the natu

medical care to israel's targeting of hospital spots and emergency meeting of the united nations security council. the on friday, the w h o is representative for the occupied palestinian territories said both hospitals needs to be protected. all, sir, that meeting the un high commissioner for human rights said israel hasn't provided enough evidence to back up its claims that the hospitals are used by him. us the foreign ministers of france and germany have met the leader of syria's new administration in damascus. john know, alvaro and i lena bad bulk representing the european union in one of the highest level west and diplomatic visits. since the assad regime was tough of last month. they cooled for a peaceful and increase of transition and say, the lifting of sanctions on syria will depend on the country's political transition . satellite images have revealed the is really ami is moving beyond the occupies gayden heights and reinforcing its presence in the syrian town of nature. since the full of the acid regime last month, these really um, it has also shelf that protest is deployed soldiers in

multiple house democrat witnesses, including those from the department of state, the national security council, and others. unanimous lee testified there was a potential appearance of a conflict of interest. these were there witnesses. how much money did biden get for being on the board? well, you start looking at this bank records, according to reports, between 2014 and october 2015. burisma paid more than $3.1 million to devin archer and hunter biden. that's over the course of a year and a half. how do we know this? some of devin archer's bank were disclosed during an unrelated federal criminal case having nothing to do with hunter biden. these bank records show 70 months that barry's smile wired to payments of $83,333. not just for one month. for two months. for three months, but for seven teen months, according to reuters. sources report that of the two payments of 83,000 and $333 each one was for hunter biden and one devin archer. now, hunter biden was paid significantly more than board members for major u.s. fortune 100 companies such as goldman sachs, comcast, citigroup. the typical boa

it was titled the election of the decade and gary had been on jimmy carter's national security council. he was the point man for. so he was directly involved it on a regular basis. but was not until many years later that he began to put it all together. and he began to realize that some the key intermediaries who who had approached the carter administration and there were two brothers, cyrus and chomsky that's jimmy. and then come to the carter administration and said, look, we're iranian businessmen. we can help you out. we know some of key people now that the iranian has taken place and the carter administration did not realize that they were really double agents who were secretly working for republicans. i as soon as i saw that piece in the new york times, i was writing for esquire magazine at the i got in touch with my editor and i spent about four months i interviewed over 150 people. i put together. 10,000 word narrative. that basically fleshed out what i'd read in the in the in the times op ed piece. i tried to grab or refute any of the assertion was there and to my astonishment

his first thought was to invite the five permanent members of the united nations security council to come together and let us all finally promote peace in the middle east. i said no way. no way am i going to invite, we've already got us and the soviet union. there's no way i'm going to invite china and france and great britain, too. it just complicates the issue. and then we exchanged ideas again. and in september, he announced that he would be willing to go to jerusalem. and he made this a public statement after he consulted with me. and i strongly approved. he announced this to the parliament of egypt and i contacted menachem begin who responded to me with an invitation for sadat to come and he did. he went. it was a momentous event. the first baptist church in washington where i attended services adjourned early so i could go home and watch sadat's speech. it was a harsh speech. if you read the text, he laid down the maximum demands of the arab world. it wasn't important what he said. it was where he said it. and then through me, he invited menachem begin to join him in israeli te

facility is where i was targeting of hospital spots and emergency meeting of the united nations security council on friday. the w a chose representative for the occupied palestinian territory, said both hospitals need to be protected address areas. gabriel is onto has more from the united nations in new york. during an emergency un security council meeting, the world health organization urge is real. to resend it's evacuation demands about allowed to a hospital in indonesian hospital. all are, which is the last remaining minimal functional scope. the north casa, is struggling to stay all food in water. if you are depleting fast, balls patrol has been without many essential medicines for more than $85.00 days. the w h o has documented 650 for attacks on health care facilities and gaza since october 2023. the w o 2 has warranty for pets and of systematic dismantling of the health care system in north casa. this pattern must be reversed while briefing the council. boker took the un high commissioner for human rights, directly responded to the claims by israel in the united states. that hospitals an

national security official who they voted for? >> what's important for your viewers to understand that the national security council staff has a very, very small number of political appointees selected by the president. the overwhelming majority of people who work for the national security council are career professionals who come over for a limited time, a year or two years from the defense department or the intelligence community, or the state department or the department of homeland security, for that matter. these are professionals who do not have allegiance to party. they have allegiance only to country. they are the hardest working, most effective, most capable people we have in the u.s. government, in the national security enterprise. and they keep this country strong and secure. and so asking them whether or not they support this party or that party misses the very basic point, that they're not here to do politics, they're here to do the people's work. they swear an oath to the constitution. and i can tell you every day i work with these folks, they live up to that. and many of them have said, we're very happy to keep worki

military adviser to the president of the united states, the secretary of defense and the national security council. before that, general milley served as chief of staff of the army. and over his distinguished military career, he held multiple command and staff positions that included tours in iraq, afghanistan, korea and multiple international hot spots. i had the honor of working alongside general milley when i was serving as the assistant to the secretary of defense for public affairs and pentagon press secretary under the late ash carter. and i saw firsthand general milley's leadership, his wise counsel and his deep commitment to our men and women in uniform and as general milley enjoys a well deserved retirement. he's actually busier than ever and among his new responsibilities, he's now a senior adviser to jp morgan chase. today, he's going to help us better understand the dangerous world we live in and the threats to our nation and our economy. please join me in giving a warm welcome to general mark milley. [applause] thanks for being here. it is great to see you. i'm not used to seeing you

work with an incredible team in dod would also in a cabinet especially the members of the national security councils all been very positive experience. that's a great thing because if you look at the challenges that we have been faced with we have had to manage multiple significant challenges simultaneously. we were able to do that because we had a very solid national security strategy. my boss continued to resource us in a way that allowed us to execute that strategy and so it's been a pretty good experience for me and i have thoroughly enjoyed having the opportunity. i think if you look at where we are right now, our adversaries are weaker, our relationships with our allies and partners are stronger. the economy is as strong as it's been in a long time so i i think we are in pretty good shape. patrick i think that's the last question. >> thank you mr. secretary. that was the last russian and this concludes our press briefing ladies and dogham. thank you very much. >> thanks everybody. [inaudible conversations]

with -- work with an en credible team in dod but also you know in cabinet, the members of national security council, all been very positive, that is a great thing. if you look at challenges that we have been faced with,en we had to manage multiple significant challenges simultaneously. we had a solid national security strategy. my boss continued to resource us in a way that allowed us to execute that strategy. and so, it is has been a pretty good experience for me. i have enjoyed having the opportunity. and i think if you look at where we are right now, our adversaries are weaker, our relationships with our allies and partner are stronger. the economy is strong as it has a been in a long time. i think we're in pretty good shape, patrick that is the last question. >> thank you, mr. secretary itic was the last question, this concludes our press briefing, thank you for joining us today. >> thanks everybody. >> c-span washington journal. a live forum from washington, d.c. to across the country. coming up friday morning, bloomberg supreme court reporter discusses supreme court decision. and john malcolm

the one thing i will say is that the professionals who make up the national security council staff, they're not political. they come from departments and agencies across the government, from the defense department, the intelligence community, the state department. and they serve the country and the constitution. they don't serve anyone's particular political agenda. that is to the good for america's national security. >> and finally, president biden set to give a speech tomorrow from the state department about foreign policy, about the the biden years. can you give us any sort of preview what his final message will be? >> well, he's going to ask the question, is america stronger than we were four years ago? and he's going to answer that question question with a definitive yes, our alliances are stronger. as i said before, our enemies and competitors are weaker. we've kept the nation out of war. every element of american power is stronger today. and if you look around the world at every other significant country, they're looking at the united states in 2025 and saying,, i wish we were in the

is there a start guessing of hospitals, spots, and emergency meeting of the united nations security council area on friday. the w h o is representative for the occupied palestinian territories said both hospitals needs to be protected. we'll have more on that security council meeting in a moment. but 1st, here's how to make mood with low on those forced evacuation or does hey zach listen orders extended to uh, the last remaining a small health facility that's allowed the hospice that its a charge part of a charge mom and i the in the past few weeks at the beginning of the grant, offensive and as of right in the span of the, of less than an hour. another evacuation order sharply ordering and is threatening anyone to remain inside the hospital. wanted everyone to evacuate immediately. similar to what happened to the agent hospital now concerning the part of this has many of the people inside these 2 health facilities are in fact people who work for simply it's made to leave a come out one hospital when it was on by the is really monitors, we really talk about people in, in, in critical condit

so my thought was addressed as to the united nations security council this week. and the american and william system as well have a right to self defense, although she failed to comment on the idea of destruction. of the reason that discrepancy was negative viruses, i'm boss of the, to the you and the united states condemns the who's these latest attacks on israel and supports israel's right to self defense. these really military response following the december 19th incident was clearly disproportionate and deserves our condemnation. the bottom line is that human has been subjected to airborne aggression in recent days. these attacks have nothing to do with the right to self defense. they are nothing other than military aggression by the collective west against a sovereign state. there's 2 of us as a bid farewell to tony tony and full, we really focus on the pivotal story is that defined the yeah. on to say i was in the covers the escalating crisis between yeah, man and the west. the gems tuesdays and the supports for the palestinian people have been hammering isr