this is not his field for him policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme the national security council under the supremely, that the supreme leader makes the last decision most the press since he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but not with foreign policy and off with security as the good cause, stop you about more from the former advisor on me least issues. the foreign policy chief ivy is longer up those right the, the insulating people are disgusted with what's going on with that. sending huge amounts of money to the lensky in terms of weapons to kill russians when actually, we're taking money away from people that hadn't been one of the big things in the tell you that i never about domestically is that the color labor government have taken one and a half 1000000000 pounds away from the the plug it back to going undergoing. i'm still here with us. decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based complex for him. house during part one, you were talking to me about the desk and not having a foreign policy control in the

this is not his field for him policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but know with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief obvious loaner. after this break, the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based conflicts for him. how starting part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in iran? i mean arguably, i mean i lived in tyrone. he does have power to resign at any rate, but as regards and i should also add as regards to what he wrote chest, so it goes to the side of the national security of his teachers as a true. so maybe he will have a choice. i don't know, but there's a lot of, i mean it's a very lead scroll to issue, but i just wonder on

special review board to conduct a comprehensive review of the role and procedures of the national security council staff in the conduct of foreign and national security policy. i anticipate receiving the reports from the attorney general and the special review board at the earliest possible date upon the completion of these reports. and i will share their findings and conclusions with the congress and the american people. although not directly involved, vice admiral john poindexter has asked to be relieved of his assignment as assistant to the president for national security affairs and to return to another assignment, the navy lieutenant colonel oliver north has been relieved of his duties on the national security council staff. i am deeply troubled that the implementation of a policy aimed at resolving a truly tragic situation in the middle east has resulted in such controversy. as i've stated previously, i believe our policy goals toward iran were well founded. however, the information brought to my attention yesterday convinced me that in one aspect, implementation of that policy was seriously

this is not his field. foreign policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state but not with foreign policy. and not with security. how's the good call? stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues, the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner. after this break, the people who are disgusted with what's going on with that, sending huge amounts of money into the lensky in terms of weapons, tequila russians. we're actually, we're taking money away from people that have been one of the big things in the tell you that i know about domestically. is that doing covering labor government have taken one and a half 1000000000 pounds away from the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us. decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based complex for him. house during part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy

this is not his field. foreign policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under those supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent. he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state but know with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner after the spring, the, as the year ends being coming from administration continues to believe it can in the conflict in ukraine from pen is people are beginning to understand. and in this conflict is more difficult in starting a war. the problem is moscow cube and washington wants different outcomes, the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and coming director of the baby based complex for him . how starting part one you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in iran? i mean, arguably, i mean i lived in tyrone he does have power to resign a

i also want to refer us to the two last meetings, emergency meetings, of the united nations security councilf the members of the united security council denounced the presence of rwandan troops on the ground. so we find ourselves in a situation where all the world is cognizant of the fact that rwandan defense troops are on the ground. everyone is saying it. the media, which is on the ground, is saying it too. and the only voice that claims that this is not true is the rwandan voice. amna: for anyone unfamiliar, can you kind of briefly explain why this area in particular is of such strategic importance, why there's fighting there now? therese: so, the rwandan defense forces have been occupying very strategic areas in eastern drc. i want to speak about rubaya. rubaya is mined in all of the region. according to united nations experts, rwandan defense forces have used forced labor to force labor to force children, women, and men to mine artisanal mines to get coltan. and in a month, the rwandan defense forces exploit and transfer over 150 metric tons of coltan that are then shipped over to rwand

the policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council under the supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press spent . he is basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but know with foreign policy and off with security as the group. i'll stop you back more from the former advisor on middle east issues. the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner after this break. the other of many places in the world where you can say your, on the divide between the 2 oceans and what you might not think kids, what does this, hey, and what is northern or found your vision? and the, you know, is that us national park and today's, we know the was a stuff was from taking a deep side interest because the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and founder and going director of the baby based conflicts for him. how starting part one, you were talking to me about this yesterday and not having a foreign policy control in there on. i mean, arguably, i mean i lived in terra and he does have

national security adviser. so therefore effectively kash patel's boss when he was at the national security council. he described him tonight on msnbc with jen psaki as a, quote, climbing weed. he says kash patel falsely claimed to have been in charge of a whole directorate at the national security. >> council security. >> council when he was not. bolton wrote in his book, quote, his puffery was characteristic of the resume inflation we had detected. when trump pressed him on us, we found he had also exaggerated his role in cases he worked on as a justice department lawyer. given the sensitivity of the national security council's responsibilities, problems of credibility or reliability would ordinarily disqualify any job applicant. we found he had exaggerated his role in cases he worked on as a justice department lawyer, bolton said. he said that in that book that was actually in an in an op ed specifically opposing kash patel for this fbi job, he exaggerated his role in cases he worked on as a justice department lawyer, as well as exaggerating his position in the national security council. what did

because then the, then jake sullivan of the national security council. the in the united states doesn't look so stupid. mode is blinking, then your playing mazda strokes here, bringing the u. s, which always wanted to get involved because clearly the us were involved in terms of the reaction to iran's retaliation using the destroys in the, in the red sea. and they're prepared for it. they going forward, this was the plan all alone. it wasn't. i mean, i'm not, you only can say that about ukraine work that heavy. the dictators are lensky is losing, but this is the plan to exterminate god. well, i think it's higher. so i think for as for, for a long time, i mean the plan about garza and the pon about the west bank. and of course, destroying this bullet has been loading about for a long time. it is deeply entrenched in the israeli policy, and of course, netanyahu came to congress and related to ross very clearly. he said in vice here to america, to a war games get wrong. so you, if you like the head of the octopus. uh that is strangling in israel and he said

we'll work on the national security council all the tools needed to protect our national security anddiplomatic piece is a part of that. when it comes to the u.n. i have confidence that the president will make sure that we have the tools. >> i like your answer to the previous question better, but thank you very much. >> senator, actually you raise a good point. when you do a blanket executive order like that, sometimes unintended consequences takes over. having said that every one of these executive orders can be amended and we have a history of amending them, both sides, over years. so, i'm not as concerned about that, but it is a valid and legitimate point. thank you so much. senator cruz, you're up. >> thank you, mr. chairman. congresswoman, congratulations on your nomination, you're going to be terrific. i want to go back to a topic you discussed with senator cornyn, focus on iran's push to build a nuclear arsenal which poses the most immediate and acute threat to america's national security. when the ayatollah chants death to america, he means it. and i believe he would absolutel

karine: i just mentioned that brett mcgirk will be holding a national security council, is holding up a call, i think that's going to be really important. they will talk more about the implementation of this. national security adviser jake sullivan was just here two days ago on monday. and i think kind of laid out a really good framework for all of this the thinking process, how it was going to move forward. brett mcgirk is on the ground. he has all of the information, he has been there at the direction of the president. certainly with national security adviser jake sullivan leading that effort. and so he's going to have a lot more information than any of us here. will have. because he's been on the ground. understanding, working with the negotiators and understanding how this process has worked. so that's how this works. reporter: you said that you wish your successor luck. have you had any extensive conversations with her? about this job? karine: i haven't. but i'm not -- i'm not the only white house press secretary or soon to be former white house press secretary out there. i'm sur

this is not his field for him, the policy security policy lies in calling with the supreme national security council. and does a supremely that the supreme leader makes the laws decision most the press stuff. he's basically concerned with domestic administration of the state, but not with foreign policy and off with security. how's that work? i'll stop you about more from the former advisor on middle east issues, the foreign policy chief ivy as a loaner. after this break the the us near doing the, the leads, told him the articles and you might, it's a city of the news release to me. i don't see them, but you, me for the stuff. you know, probably my you can see in the united. so that's literally ridiculous. this is yeah . kind of shows live with the board meeting stage of this list of most of the details to, to make a cosigner. but i would just take one of those same and use the link to the stores at the store to, to $24.00. would need to even, and 0, it's a good key and our phone yet. so that's the the plug it back to going underground. i'm still here with us decrypt for the british diplomat and fou

stefanik: we will have to -- that will be a strategy i developed with the national security council. o work with our allies within the united nations, within the security council. there are allies that are already considering this and looking at it, and that has been publicly reported. obviously pushing back on iran is a top priority. it was a success during president trump's first term and we have seen the catastrophic results during the previous four years when you have had an emboldened iran that has led to directly the october 7 terrorist attack against israel and hezbollah firing tens of thousands of rockets against israeli civilians. sen. cruz: let's move to another topic. you and i talked about the deeper rot in the united nations when it comes to supporting terrorism, especially israel. as you discussed with senator mccormick, you and rwa has provided support for hamas and other terrorist groups inside gaza. the world health organization has been complicit in the use of hospitals for terrorist activities, including the holding of hostages. complicity of these organizations dee

which was released in 1950, it was orchestrated by the state and then sort of newly formed national security council. but they said we were fundamentally to reassess our national security in the whole big picture of american security, foreign policy and national and the entirety of u.s. grand strategy, essentially. and he said that during the drafting of nsc 68 at that time, the pillars of our postwar foreign policy were failing. so basically we were in a moment we're having emerged victorious from the world war. we were nonetheless losing the entire for what really do we do with the post-cold war, with the post-world two moment, with the early cold war? and then, you know, if you zoom very out, nixon, his colleagues came together and put together a us grand strategy that arguably set us up to win the long cold war and later was, as reagan saw it, set up, the first principles that we ultimately use for victory and contribue therefore to two enormous american success in the toughest contests we've had so if we're now in an era where those at hudson believe we're facing something like a new cold war,

>> that is exactly what the national security council is therefore. they have to make a key and imperative. i don't know if you all have seen the chinese robots, they are incredible. they will approve or insulate the world in a few years and china will potentially win the ai race. we are at the cusp of winning or losing everything because if you will really be everything. so the national security council needs to bring technical experts from the outside and agency experts to figure out how does each agency reads together its authority into a comprehensive, expedient ai strategy? >> congressman vera, we are talking about the first 100 days of the trump administration. one thing the president has promised to do is the executive order which set up the u.s. ai institute that had directives for agencies to cultivate a key-focused policies. if that is scrapped, as soon as a week from now, what are the implications for national security? >> i don't think it's a great idea. or if it is scrapped, what replaces it. you have national security but then you have a

i would know by the way that you were also working in the bomb and national security council and the clinton national security council, your thoughts and everything you've seen today. you know, i would say i have a mix of relief and hope and worry relief and hope because we're seeing pictures of hostages coming home of prisoners about to go back to their homes. people are now walking on the streets of gaza and they're not worried about a bomb falling or a drowned strike. the violence is coming to an end, and it's at least conceivable that after this tragedy, maybe some breakthrough will emerge. it's going to take time. but the landscape has changed one kind of hope worry, because i don't know with confidence that this cease fire will turn into a durable piece that worries me, that they harvested what they could agree on, which is this swap. but they didn't agree on the big tough questions, will israel completely withdrawal. busy or where they keep a buffer zone and control of the border between egypt and gaza. will there be a plan that how mosse and israel can agree on about post gove

pa tel national security council in addition to serving as public defender in florida. mr.el will be on capitol hill on thursday in confirmation hearing. >> ladies and gentlemen, please welcome former pentagon chief of staff and author of government gangsters, kash patel. ♪ we are going to put an end behind donald trump and we are going to do it together. [applause] >> what i want to talk the about is, you guys have been so kind to make my book best seller, i thought there was no better place to announce joint venture with steve bannon and warner entertainment to launch conservative films back into for the ecosystem so gangsters the movie is the first one and coming out in the spring just in a couple months here. we are very excited about that. but here is the thing, 8 years ago, the deep state was real. we cannot take the overcorrection approach. what we must do is identify the people in government that are crippling our constitutional republic. what does this mean, first we have to identify them. it's not a republican or democratic thing. people that started russian gate

the united nations security council has abandoned its commitment to peace. if you are a powerful nation with a permanent member and you have a right to veto, you can do almost anything. the security council will not condemn you. i think the united states has sent armed troops to about 30 countries to fight under the approval of the united nations since the second world war. other countries can do the same thing if they are powerful enough. i wrote a piece for the new york times two years ago that shows the united states is now violating at least 10 of the 30 paragraphs in the universal declaration of human rights. a lot of those relate to the discrimination against women. they are supposed to be equal. it is not just blacks being equal to whites and so forth. i think that we have a long way to go still. we need to reassess the basic progress -- purpose of the united nations to be for peace, not conflict to resolve issues. we need to recommit ourselves to the basic principles of human rights. i am going to ask all of you to call up on google for the universal

i also want to refer to the last emergency meetings of the united nations security council in which alle members of the united security council denounced the presence of her london troops on the ground so we find ourselves in a situation where all the world is cognizant of the fact that rwandan defense troops are on the ground, everyone is saying it, the media is saying it, too. and the only voice that claims this is not true is the rwandan voice. amna: for anyone unfamiliar, can you briefly explain why this area is of such strategic importance? >> there wanted defense forces have been occupying strategic areas in eastern drc. i want to speak about room via. it is mined in the region. according to experts, rwandan defense forces have used forced labor to force children, women and men to mind artisanal mines to get this. in a month, the defense forces exploited and transferred over 150 million tons. it is shipped and exported to global markets under the label of rwandan minerals. we see this is an endeavor that is economically driven and has no compunction whatsoever to violate human rig

well, listen, fascinating conversation. former us national security council official, charles done. thank you so much for being with us today. my pleasure to you. so what's the bottom line? i'm just not going to get rapturous about the possibility of a real ceasefire, yet it treats the politics of this moment. the countless palestinians have been killed and maimed and under siege the dozens of as really hostages, who being held as a single punctuation point. when what would make this real is not a sprint of com that could fall apart, but rather a marathon in the suspension of killing and destruction. that's what we need to see . who monitoring a needs to flow freely and genuine discussions about the future of constructive governance. and we'll, just as an economy for policy needs needs to be baked into this moment. i don't yet believe that this cease fire solves many of the dramatic issues that if that this crisis and if kept it burning, it would be great to lead me to be wrong and to see a new fair and just equal librium between israel and palestine are emerged from these fires, bu

of international affairs of george washington university and a former director at the us national security council. charles, thank you so much for being with us. would love to just get your take on this moment and what are you confident in? what are you worried about? the bad news to me is that they're still so many moving parts here that it's going to be hard for different countries have to help them go straight this united states gutter and egypt a to keep this whole thing moving. there. she'll apparently many details to be decided about which prisoners are going to be released, which hostages are going to be released? how far these really is going to withdraw from the gaza population centers, they're suppose to withdraw from all the central parts. and these are just some of the initial questions before we even get to the hard questions in phase 2 and phase 3 of the seats. very well, let's get to another voice in this, an a station, and that is incoming president. donald trump. he says this epic ceasefire agreement could have only happened as, as a result of our historic victory, meaning his in

and now the united nations security council is holding a briefing on the un agency for palestinian refugees. this comes as is raz law banning the organization in israel and the occupied not as the and territories is said to come into effects this week was chief, told the council that shutting the agency. what harm patterson? you nice. in the democratic republic of congress, eastern city of goma as rebels have taken control the, this is a scene in gold, malware intense gun bows, being formed between remaining government forces and m. 23 fighters, water and electricity supply. so the city of been cut off and why does use agencies reporting the levels of taking control of go my international air force. the groups rapid advance us for thousands of people from the house of the means you're a little slow 40. so we saw and heard terrible things, things we haven't seen. and i will continue saying that the determination of genocide to critical debate. this then side determination was not made because of anything that was happening on the ground. but more to do with the fiscal dynamics as ancient and

he is a former national security council and pentagon staff are . in addition to serving as a public defender in florida. in 2024 he was one of the featured speakers at the conservative political action conferenceheld in the washington dc area . >> ladies and gentlemen, please welcome former pentagon chief ofstaff and author of government gangsters , kash patel. [music] >> how's it going? thank you. so i thought it would be fun to go on a man c of government gangsters together and i'm so proud to be at ccac with so many great americans who represent donald trump's army to take this country back and that's what is going to take, an entire army and we all have a job to do . we are blessed by god to ighave donald trump be our juggernaut of justice, to be our leader, to be our continued warrior in the arena but we have to fill that arena with americans behind him are going to take the fight to the mainstream media, who are going to take the fight to the corporate iz bureaucracy that controls the ou swap . were going to take the fight to the defense indu

as president biden said, the elements of this deal are endorsed by the united nations security councils taken tireless efforts to reach agreement between both sides with reports of final talks this week lasting an intense 96 hours. i congratulate all those who contributed to getting to the stage. in particular, the prime minister of qatar, the egyptian resident, president biden and secretary antony blinken, as well as president—elect donald trump. the uk has been supporting them throughout from day one in office, pressing every stage for an immediate ceasefire, to free the hostages, get more aid into gaza and open up a path to lasting peace. i visited gaza and open up a path to lasting peace. ivisited israel in the occupied palestinian territories for the third time as foreign secretaryjust this week. meeting foreign ministers and presidents and hostage families to press for an end to this war i do plan for the future. we have also played a leading role in the humanitarian effort, restarting funding, funding field hospitals that have treated over 300,000 gazans, and providing over 100

have times for it the idea that the entire international institutions, like united nations, like the security council, which is the parts of the united nations that have failed. because that is this idea that the big countries, the permanent members, for example, all the security council can do what they wish. but they try and impose that will on smaller countries that are looking at them and just saying, well actually you don't do so we can do we want. well, i mean, as you know, as you're suggesting, we have to take a to look at this in terms of a historical perspective. so if you think of the past 70 is also 80, is since the end of the, the 2nd world war and compare that to the, into war period between the 1st and 2nd of all was what you see is that there was an effort after the 1st world war to create a world order which essentially collapsed within about 12 or 13 years. right? so then, a revised effort was made with a lot of the same principles, but different operating methods. and the idea of the security council, the permanent members at fountains, insistence upon the members for the have a vet

a quick example. 160 or so folks from the national security council, the best experts we have on counterterrorism were sent home in order for there to be a review of whether they are sufficiently loyal. not smart. points us -- puts us at risk. host: let us talk to callers. joe in maryland. democrat. good morning. caller: how are you doing? host: good. caller: i have one question with a couple of parts. people who work from their house, is it secure when you talk over the phone? second to that question, how come you have to wait 36 or 24 hours to talk to a person? and then when you talk to them you hear the dogs in the background and they talk about -- and in other words, there has to be some balance. host: just to clarify, when you say are the line secure. you are talking about when you call the federal government asking for help, let us say if you call the irs or social security, that kind of thing? joe? caller: in their house, that person in their house uses their laptop or whatever they using -- they are using, is that line secure from that house to you? aren't other people listening? host: an

the national security council. [cheering and applauding] >> thank you for being here.ften hear -- sorry. democracy versus constitutional republic referred to as a democracy. why not prosecution republic, what is the difference? >> thank you. democracy ruled putting the minority and present. next question. over here. >> i would like to ask if you agree or disagree. the attempted assassination of donald trump was conspiracy disguised as incompetence in my opinion. >> thank you. i have no evidence it was a conspiracy. he did say its failure by design but we will get to the bottom of it. kash patel -- dan bongino. get off your radio take over the secret service. [cheering and applauding] >> my name is mike carey and president valley. my main question is, now that we are about ready to take over this country, are we going to get rid of the ccp? >> we can't get rid of the ccp unless you want a war with china. it is a competitor to the united states. president trump understands peter navarro will finally take it serious again. we will protect our interests. thank you. >> this

>> peter: i a lot of that going through the national security council and getting farewell emails of ople's contact information. a lot of phonings from the national security council have already left the building. so the folks that are going to stay that are part of the permanent apparatus would be the ones who are in there probably right now with some of the moving truck that's might have seen in the background over the last couple days. and they are saying okay, you can take this. >> brian: good. >> peter: these have to be screened. these can go to the future biden senator at the university of delaware. this is the batch that can go next to the corvette. it needs an oil change by the way. >> brian: i hope so. >> steve: peter, you actually got the president to admit that he had those papers next to the corvette. >> peter: it was probably my best guess in four years here. i just -- they said there was something in the garage and i had seen a picture one time of a corvette in the garage and i asked him about it and the rest is history. no charges though. [laughter] >> lawrence: thanks,

i would have to revere you to our national security council on that question. reporter: meta also eliminated its dei program in hiring, training, seeking suppliers citing the supreme court ruling on affirmative action. the administration really went out of its way to convince businesses not to interpret that rolling. sec. jean-pierre: i am not going to comment on a specific action a private company takes. but i can say, you have heard from this president and administration diversity is our greatest strength. you have seen this not just by awards, but action that the president has taken. certainly, it is a sentiment you have heard echoed by leaders across businesses and government, not just us. it continues to be our stance. it is important to have different voices around the table. it is important to have different voices working on policy and make sure we are delivering for the american people. that is what we have done. that is what we have shown. as it relates to specific companies i won't comment on that policy. but i think that by our actions over the last