and this nato summit invites ukraine to nato. all allies agree with this. don't really see how that can be done when we don't know the results of the us presidential election. the new us administration's idea of ​​it, but let's imagine that on november 5th , kamela harris wins, who agrees with this concept, okay, invited, now the question is the following, in order for ukraine to become a full member of nato, the fifth article must be extended to it, in order for the fifth article to be extended to it, the agreement on ukraine's accession to nato must be ratified by all. parliaments of nato member countries. do you believe that the parliaments of countries like turkey, hungary or slovakia will do it quickly? can it take years? it could take years, that's for sure. if sweden took two years, two, two. so how many will go to ukraine in such a situation? moreover, they will say that they are absolutely in favor. they simply want to reach a political solution to the conflict in this situation, to reach an agreement between moscow and kyiv about fire something li

lake of this month, the nato, germany opened a nato. c'mon, center in the city of la stock on the baltic sea. i think finland is also involved in that. there's some criticism in germany that's this violates the cycle 2 plus 4 treaty. that was the treaty that prepared the way for german unification. and this tracy pro, prohibits nato troops being stationed on east german style. what's your position on that? well, i don't want to take issue with the drum and the interpretation of the german constitution, or of any treaties. all i can say is that russia is waging a war of aggression in which it is vying. i think every possible tenant of international law, whether it's you and charters, terry total integrity or sovereignty or whether it's the o s. c. i think it's very important that nato has a strong terrance, and that determines is based on troops. it's based on missiles and then it's based on a nuclear deterrence. and however, then we structure our troops around our own border and that's our job. so do you think actually a situation could develop where nato troops, in fact stations on east

line board, a nato front line border. now, with russia, to what extent does this joining they to increase security for, for, and after all, one could say you live together with russia and peaceful, many decades? well, there's a $1300.00. so we've actually had surgery, war skirmishes with russia. so peace is a relative term. if you look at the line of history, we do have one of the largest militaries in europe. we have 56, the 2 f eighty's. we just bought 64 f 35. we have the biggest artillery together with poland. we have a miss house, air, land, and sea, and as i always say, we don't have the biggest, we're worried about stuck home. we've always had them as a deterrent against russia. what do we give? i think in nato, we are security providers rather than security consumers. and that's the reason why we are able to join nato. so quick a final point. we have doubled nato's border with russia. 1340 kilometers of it, and we will do our parts as part of the alliance to fend off any russian english. what is the situation on t

the nato regards, as well as the important strategic partner, but nato has also partners amongst that are a process. there are also many arab countries, so i don't think that we are going to a to get any more comments. any specific comments on what's going on? 11 on right now. yeah, i want to ask you about how he feels about the upcoming elections in the us because there is a lot of nervousness in the alliance as a whole. is that a sentiment that mark richard shares? well, he didn't seem nervous at all when he was asking this question this morning. stressed and that so he understands and feels quite comfortable to be able to work with anyone who will win the race to the white house. he mentioned come on, harris of course, he has apparently a good relationship with her as he praises praise to her qualities as a politician. and she is somebody who is well known to the members of the lions as a desk. it would be done on the drum to the phone, the president who is now running again. we know that and good to and the next name, the trump, uh, whisper ad because he in the past seem to get al

, and individual parts nato, nato countries. for example, the united states, great britain and france provide ukraine with security guarantees of the swedish and finnish type. but again, and we carefully studied the swedish guarantees, it is implied that if, say, sweden is waiting for nato or finland to join, and at that moment russia attacks it, then the russian division crosses the russian-finnish border and heads to helsinki. this means that the united states is taking over. participation in the war, or are they only helping finland? do you need to understand the essence of the guarantee? so it is in ukraine and now they help, well, in fact, and not only the united states of america helps, dozens of countries help, that’s right, so i ask what will change in these guarantees, if there is a change, that the united states provides guarantees to ukraine, and clearly on a specific territory, or to a non-disputed territory or to a territory along the contact line, then it's one story, by the way. how can ukraine define the military

with his far nato cannot parts. he also addresses questions on the russia-ukraine more. -- war. sec. austin: good afternoon, everyone. it is good to be back at nato. i want to start with a few words about the middle east. as you all know, israel yesterday killed sinwar, the leader of hamas. that's a major achievement, and it opens a major opportunity for progress. sinwar was the architect of the october 17 harvest assault on israel -- october 7 terrorist assault on israel. his plot left 1200 people dead, including civilians from more than 30 other countries. and that includes the united states. he was responsible for the deaths of many americans over the years, including more than 40 americans murdered on october 7 and four murdered american hostages. sinwar devoted his life to wrecking the chances of peace between israelis and the palestinians. he's finally been brought to justice. and that removes a huge obstacle. our top priority is the 101 hostages still kidnapped in gaza, including our own american hostages. th

, there is a question of inviting ukraine to nato, and inviting ukraine to nato is only a formality, and accordingly, we need it, but not as a recipe for completion russian-ukrainian war. this is a completely parallel, necessary task. we need to be in nato, and there should be no illusions that nato will protect us or fight for ukraine in the russian-ukrainian war. nato avoids a confrontation with russia in every possible way and does not want a military confrontation with russia. they can't even turn a blind eye to russian missiles and drones flying over their territory. they are ready to ignore the use of combat, combat chemical substances, like the newcomers in britain, where. british subjects died, not only suffered russian beegliches to britain, they are willing to turn a blind eye to the attempts on the directorate, to a series of attempts that were implemented in bulgaria, also on the owner of a defense enterprise, on other sabotages carried out by russia, and against this background, we believe that the invitation to nato, is it really a security guarantee? no, not a security

, that ukraine will definitely be in nato, and it is only a matter of time, and that nato and paromstein'sllies will do everything possible to ensure that ukraine wins. well, his very first visit is a big signal, a message for the kremlin, for putin, for all the dictators of the world, that the secretary general of nato made his first visit to ukraine just on the third day. there can be no ambiguity here, it clearly and clearly shows what the priority is. as mark ryut said, his priority in his activities in the new position of nato secretary general is ukraine, so that ukraine can win, and what is needed for this, that is why he made this visit, met with the president of ukraine and the top political leadership of ukraine , listened to the proposals, requests of the ukrainian side, what is needed in order to win this war, what we need every day at the front, which nomenclature, shells. ammunition, aviation, anti-aircraft defense, er, armored personnel carriers, bmps, tanks, planes, rebs, everything we need, drones and so on, and what remstein can help, what nato can help, and what is in hi

but of course, it's clear that with the current um, a very robust defense plans that nato has a nato allies will need to invest more than 2 percent in defense. and that's an area where a mockery that will need to show leadership. however, good to, as most challenging task might be to keep the u. s. a. board to need to. so donald trump the elected again, those men seem to get along boots or even the nickname the trump, with threats. but he also strongly opposed drums. protection is economic policy. so he can be both firm, but also have of a very good relationship with the american leaders, but leaving his home neighborhood in the hague will also mean that includes the best known for riding his bike to work. presumably has to be about some of his personal freedoms off to old service because need to achieve as a highly visible job. with a lot of security us and our correspondent terry schultz is at nato headquarters. i asked her if this could be seen as the beginning of a new era for the alliance. many ways, of course, it's a new era because you're in stoughton. burke has been here so l

second, now nato.lways hoped and continues to hope that putin will come to his senses and at least agree to freeze the war. ugh. along the line of contact. hoped for 2022, they hoped for it in 2023, 2024 ends , there is no sign of the end of the war, even on the horizon, money, billions are being spent, the european economy does not look happy, china's influence is increasing, the united states is in a difficult political situation before the elections, everyone is asking, well, what's next, and then an option arises, maybe it will be possible to stop them like this. .. in a way to say that we do not want to interfere, but we will intervene if you destroy the status quo, this is what you achieved, we condemn it, it is bad, you occupied ukrainian territory, you declared it yours, all this is terrible, but , but we we understand that we cannot solve anything here by force, but you must... understand that you will not achieve anything new by village means, so that you understand this for sure, we announce

that is, such a partial accession to nato. we cannot say whether this is profitable for ukraine at the moment, maybe. and profitable, but that will depend on the results of the american elections, but in general, of course, it is better until then, before joining nato, to directly liberate as much of the territory of ukraine as possible, that is, these discussions have been going on for a very long time, i, by the way, once participated in them myself a long time ago, when we talked about the possible accession of ukraine to nato, ah, well, along the borders, which were determined by the demarcation line, which was determined by the minsk agreements, that was the idea to join nato then , of course, that if we did it then, most likely, if we were taken there, most likely there was no such a full-scale attack by russia, this is an understandable matter, well, most likely the most likely, but uh, well, now there are, in addition to long-range weapons, there are other important things that the west can do. first of all, to invest

but you've previously said that it's an issue that you're taking up with your fellow nato's nato alliance ministers. a foreign minister has, excuse me, what are other leaders and for investors telling you when you take this up with them as well, i'm not commenting on behalf of the messages clear. and i have also taken this up a bilaterally with, with my colleagues. and i just hope that that, that we will be able to help ukraine in the best possible way. put this into the big picture for us because you've said that you shouldn't rule anything out. and long term, as we've heard, including sending troops is in the risk that at some point it will be too late. yes, well, we have quotes that i'm scrutinizing the situation um on a daily basis to get uh with, with the allies in partners. but again, this is not the situation when it would be about sending troops to ukraine. this is not something from interest is considering at the moment, or of causing the long term. it's important that we don't rule everything out. on the contrary it's, it's very important that we speak to a narrative which is cl

so nato has rejected this proposal. it is said, it risk the alliance becoming part of the conflict which showed nato do. is this something we are carefully uh, now uh, investigating, uh and nature will of course and comment when, when the time comes, but so far, this is indeed the case. but at the same time, each nation is also responsible for protecting its, its own age as space and, and, and the security of, of, i don't see defense. so in this regard, we really need to take this situation very, very seriously. but it goes back to, you know, the joint approach and, and, you know, how much on site and how united nato nato allies are in any potential response. um and, you know, nato allies have said previously, we have to do whatever we can to help you. crane and whatever we can to avoid escalation and, you know, the question is, is that still a realistic approach given the current set of conditions on the ground, that certainly is still land remains the, the, the approach that's a also a feeling this is supporting. but

well democratic, people's democratic the republic, yes, it, it was actually recognized including by nato countries, that is what is the paradox of the situation, i.e. the athletes of this country took part in all competitions there, it had diplomatic missions there and so on, so, on the one hand, it ... you should really pay attention to the fact that this topic has become more active, and it is not only stoltenberg, there are many different scenarios appearing in various western publications, i would say more than once that this is absolutely not a new story, similar scenarios are are considered since the second half of the 22nd year, only it was in specialized publications, analytical, expert, er, political science, yes, and now it just came out in the popular media in such a way to the general public, because it has clearly already passed a certain test in the expert . now they also look and measure there public opinion and attitude to all this and so on. for ukraine, it is more possible as an option with japan, if parallels are already drawn, but again, japan is not a member of nato,

now let me turn back to our work at nato. this has been an historic defense ministerial for three reasons. first, this is our new secretary-general's inaugural ministerial meeting, so i want to thank mark rutte and his staff for convening us. i also look forward to working very closely with mark and his team. second, this is our first defense ministerial with nato's indo pacific partners, australia, japan, new zealand, and the republic of korea. and that just underscores the importance of working with our partners in the indo pacific on boosting industrial-based resilience, combating disinformation, and much, much more. and third, this ministerial is the first high-level nato gathering since the 71st-anniversary summit in washington back in july. the summit was a major success. we welcome to sweden --we welcomed sweden as a nato ally. we endorsed a nato industrial expansion capacity pledge, and that will strengthen the defense industrial base on both sides of the atlantic, increase large-scale multinational procurement, and h

it's nice to meet you and welcome to nato. it's cute thanks. i've covered for your the, for secretary general that i've covered and to be fair, all of them come in saying that they're going to improve the, the cooperation with the european union. maybe you have more, you experience that then the rest. so i'm interested in specifically how you're going to do this is going to help on military mobility. and on the capability targets you've got new defense plans, biggest revamp in decades. how are you going to help this tech work come up with these? um, increase number of troops that they've promised. what are you going to do specifically about production capability? you've been sick and nato's been saying for years inc. increased production capacity and they're still not there. you've got lower stocks. what are some specifics you're going to do to get nato to the war fighting capability that it's promising with these new operational plans? now for a good question, maybe 1st of start with the, with the nature you um, and of course i'm good friends

the former prime minister of the netherlands mark rutte, while the rhetoric about the continuity of nato policy, including in relation to our country, remains, we will discuss these and other significant international issues with alexander takavinin, ambassador of the russian federation to the kingdom of belgium, now in touch with the fifth studio, alexander avriilevich, i greet you, good morning! so stoltenberg summed up - summed up - 10 years of his work, he wrote an article, this article itself, it is entitled as a reflection on the decisive decade as nato secretary general, that's exactly how it sounds, and he called this period the most important for the alliance since the cold war, not much, not little, that's how you would sum up the work of jens stoltenberg, well, first of all, nato. it's an intergovernmental organization, where, as in any such structure, decisions are made by member countries, and the secretary general is a high -level official who is hired to implement these decisions, so the role of the secretary general, probably, should not be overestimated, especially, that

to nato until the liberation of the occupied territories.s, 0800 211 3801, if not, 080 211 382. absolutely free, pick up your phones or smartphones, call, and at the end of this hour, in less than 40 minutes, we will pick you up final results. so, let's add a little background on why we're talking about this. ukraine and its western allies. create a possible compromise, according to which kyiv can receive either membership in nato or some similar guarantees, in exchange for a diplomatic solution to the issue of territories occupied by russia in the future. the financial times writes about it, and it is one of the most discussed articles in the last few days. in fact, we are talking about the model, in particular, so writes the financial times, according to which west germany existed for a long time. and we now see the graphic on the screen, western diplomats and an increasing number of ukrainian officials are inclined to think that significant security guarantees can become the basis of a negotiated settlement in which russia will retain de

april 2008, of course, sees the nato announcement in both of us that ukraine would be a member of nato. and then just to take matters up to the present day. we have us defense secretary lloyd austin, announcing october 2021. that's a dual to nature. membership for ukraine was open as to how the russians would like it to view ukraine's membership of late. so there was never no better source for this. then the car on c, i a director william burns in 2008 as us impasse that the must go. bronze wrote an e mail to us secretary of state police or rice, which explained, quote, ukrainian entry into nature gives the brightness of or red lines for the russian that leads in more than 2 and a half years of conversations with key russian players from knuckle, dragging the dr assistance of the kremlin to bolton's shop, as a liberal critics, i have yet to find any one of use ukraine in late to anything other than a direct challenge to russia's interest. madam president of the steam representatives, but the current war in ukraine was always about nato expansion. and not about caesar of territory, was

and it doesn't mean nato, they are part of nato. it means we have a relationship with them, like we do with other countries where we supply weapons so they can defend themselves in the future. but it is not. if you notice, i was the one that i was saying that i am not prepared to support the nato ization of ukraine. so as hurricane milton arrives in the us, it's also providing a convenient excuse for the west not to commit to ukraine on several fronts. and a storm cloud gather over florida, also gathering over to you have a zalinski ones out of time on the options on his bikers run for political cover. the forecasts for the training and regime looks very bleach, indeed. valid to national security consult on the arrow rasmussen says that this stormy weather is just a convenient excuse for the us to escape solving it for the issue. the hurricane provides a good politic and cover for this. i don't think it. i think of that hurricane was not happening. there'd be another reason. so it's a we've got disarray going on in the background, w

. invitation to 'oin nato. very briefly, eu _ invitation to join nato. and very briefly, eu leaders - invitation tojoin nato. and very briefly, eu leaders will also be talking about the middle east. can we expect any kind of concrete action from the meeting? i kind of concrete action from the meeting?— the meeting? i don't think anything _ the meeting? i don't think anything concrete - the meeting? i don't think anything concrete will - the meeting? i don't think. anything concrete will come today. there was some agreement which is not always the case on the middle east a few days ago when you had 27 countries agreeing the actions of israel in the south of lebanon where there was firing on united nations peacekeeping troops, all the 27 said it was unacceptable. but you have divisions still within the group of 27 about how best to approach this situation. there is a growing rift between president macron of france and benjamin netanyahu, israeli prime minister. of course none of this helps the very dire situation

e\ that nato stands with also said that nato stands with ukraine, buti also said that nato stands with ukraine, but i asked him, people in ukraine do not want to hear about symbolism, they want concrete steps. looking ahead to a meeting that will happen soon where countries who have supported ukraine in terms of weapons get together to discuss what more they can do, can we expect more concrete steps? for example, the permission to use long—range missiles on targets inside russia, to which mark rutte did not want to be drawn too much. he said ukraine had the right to defend itself but it would be up to nato allies individual nato allies. for volodymyr zelenskyy, it was interesting, he referred to the fact a decision has not been made on long—range missiles and even expressed some frustration. he will be pleased that mark rutte has prioritised ukraine in terms of the first foreign visit. , ., ., , . visit. in terms of that basic question — visit. in terms of that basic question that _ visit. in terms of that basic question that volodymyr i question that volodymyr zelenskyy has been pushi

, the new nato secretary general is the former prime minister of holland, ruty. we will take a break now, we will continue the conversation with our guests, literally in a few minutes, when we return to the studio. don't miss central television - the first information show about the events and people of the week. the devil wears green. we will show world leaders that we are a real force. why, after american experiments to save the climate, the sky begins to smell of sulfur, as if mad scientists with their experiments open a real portal to the underworld. it's like living under a hundred-ton boulder that can fall at any moment. what is the essence of these devilish experiments, what forces are behind it and what in itself. and is it really necessary to say goodbye to clear skies forever in order to cool the planet by a couple of degrees? this will be your central television. tomorrow at 19:00 on ntv. nevsky, the new season from monday at 20:00 on ntv. yes. the beginning of a career has changed a lot, the taste of favorite burgers is gone, more than 200 checks duri

said that ukraine will be accepted into nato, even if only on condition. if part of our territories will be temporarily, of course, under occupation. in general, what he said about it testifies to certain, so to speak, intentions, bubbling or some backroom negotiations on this matter, primarily between representatives of western political elites, take your word for it, or perhaps this is an adequate assessment of the situation that is developing now and on the front of ukraine, and in general during these years of war. which we have, i would really like that these statements were made when jen stoltenberg was in charge and spoke more about it, because there are definitely such precedents and practices, we must mention here germany itself, when it was divided, and one part became and very quickly integrated into nato, and the other part only after a bunch of years, in fact, when the berlin wall fell, besides, we have a precedent, and i very much... where one part is controlled by the greek part, the other part, turkey, two countries, members of nato, cyprus

if your president is right to nato is becoming and decisive and fearful, the nato is no longer fit for purpose. is it? when i have to create me is my president know in this code and perfect. you know, some, many, if you're looking to based on it, there are some 7 other that's a new federal dimes. what that i show has sometimes successfully installed in the hands of best and us so the 1st as the and 1st battle dying. but that i shall see all trying to communicate is that the conflict should happen only on the 1030 of the victim and the address on what the what agent should be remain on punched. this is the 1st time in the military history. and the 2nd idea of what the issue is that trying to get it to communicate over, click over play to us. is that the right? it is impossible for russia to rules. again, it's not the correct the right size, last 7 of or so the throughout the, the he's the result nobody have up as of may. so i'm not persuaded them that all the other members are showing in his woods in decision and fear of a rush on. so i'll try and do the install this free or so. it is,

of the main reasons for the lack of security in the skies of ukraine, and in particular, near the nato borders, of our neighbors is the lack of decisions on joint work, about joint defense, what works in the skies of the middle east and helps the defense of israel, can also work in the skies of our part of europe, in ukraine, as well, helping to save lives, are special. night decisions are a very effective tactic, today we talked, in particular, about this with mark ryuta. we will continue to convince all partners of what needs to be implemented, what is needed for effective protection of the sky. and there is the reaction of the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian- ukrainian war, the deputy spokesperson pentagon sabrina singh at a briefing. said that the north atlantic alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over ukraine, as it does over israel. let's hear what she said. i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields. from the beginning, when russia invaded ukraine, the president instructed our

first we will start with nato and the eu. of- there. first we will start with nato and the eu. start with i nato and the eu. of course, i'm good friends with all the senior leaders in the eu, and i'm looking forward to working with them, and i will have meetings scheduled with the incoming president and council and the person who has been commissioned to continue in that role. the main players. i welcome, i must say, eu efforts to defence. i think there is a clear recognition, both on the side of nato and the european union, that we both value and more capable european defence. of course, being complementary to and operable with nato. but that's also what i hear from the eu side. nobody wants parallel structures or duplication of what nato is already doing. i think we can be on the same page on this. but clearly, the eu has to think about how to implement all of these policies, and i'm really looking forward to working with them in conjunction. in the end it is the same goal, to keep this part of the world say. an industry, this is clearly for a me priority. without a strong tr

without nato, we will not be able to end this war, prevent or prevent the next one, and we must workusly, systematically and professionally. you already mentioned about... the victory plan that was supposed to be presented to the ukrainians, well, at least that way andriy yarmak said that we will show the ukrainians the victory plan, but with the exception of some secret articles and points, the administrator of the united states agency for international development, samantha paver, during a visit to kyiv, in an interview with the public, commented on the victory plan from the point of view of the economy and management, without touching on its military aspects, let's hear what she said... well, our focus on the civilian side is another battlefield to make sure that those who would want to undermine ukrainian democracy, who wanted that she would return to her old habits regarding corruption, that these people, these forces did not succeed, well, enough of this unclear, frankly, quote, i think that she herself did not see this plan of victory, but sybig, who was also in of the united

because now at the anniversary summit of nato they raised this question, are nato ready to change itsharter to make it so as to partially take ukraine at the anniversary summit this did not happen nato. there is, peace is possible, but this is not decided by ukraine, not germany, not britain, this is decided by those who will build the security architecture of the post-war world, of course, look at... well, yes, indeed, there were a lot of these conversations along the dnieper, yes, now we have more conversations about and we are conducting onologies, remember, earlier we conducted them about north-south korea, about this very parallel, what is it, the thirty-eighth, yes, now we remembered east, west berlin, by the way, look, by the way, along the dnieper, the dnieper passes through kiev, absolutely, we remember west and east berlin, this very wall, and you know, i i think that this is good, it is so, well, not that... a good, very interesting analogy, it should be given a little more attention, let's, let's remember, let's remember how this division of territories into western and ea

the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals. russia is already on the verge of exhausting its resources. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory is it so analysis of processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they able to use, let's say, the resources of the lukashenko army allied with them, vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, have read everything, accept my union, i thank you, it was difficult, i was just interested, but this is absolutely did not eat, help understand the present and predict the future, offered the united states to conclude bilateral security with us. a project for those who care and think about the political club every sunday 20:00 for espresso. ukrainian military intelligence reported the details of another operation to destroy a pro-russian collaborator, but did not take responsibility, as before... but such operations are becoming more and more, which is evidence of whether there is competition between ukrainian speci

, _ about strengthening europe within nato, is _ about strengthening europe within nato, is it— aboutato, is it also about trump proving european _ nato, is it also about trump proving european security in nato because you are _ european security in nato because you are worried about the us election. _ you are worried about the us election, given what trump has had in the _ election, given what trump has had in the past — election, given what trump has had in the past. 35mg election, given what trump has had in the past-— in the past. any individual labour sunporters _ in the past. any individual labour sunporters are — in the past. any individual labour supporters are over— in the past. any individual labour supporters are over in _ in the past. any individual labour supporters are over in the - in the past. any individual labour supporters are over in the us - in the past. any individual labour l supporters are over in the us being part of the democratic election campaign and they are there as individuals, they are there in their own time, they are there at their own time, they are

if we wish, we can convene an extraordinary nato summit, we can then quickly ratify, we can join natoretically in a few months, but in the european union it is a different story, i think that ukraine's chances of joining the european union are close to... if only ukraine itself is our power here does not belong, but the chances of ukraine joining nato are more doubtful at the moment, especially considering the russian aggression against ukraine, so if theoretically we can join nato faster than the european union, but the question is that if the european union is really very, very likely, then with nato is much more complicated. mr. oleksii, thank you, oleksii goncharenko, people's deputy of ukraine, by the way, just today. orbán will speak at the european parliament and we will have our correspondents working there, so we will find out if they will be there, follow events, and tomorrow the correspondents will join us, a little later on our air, closer to 12:00, we will talk about the hungarian and slovak contacts and the stories, the situations they create for us to talk about, so sta

rutte stated that ukraine is closer to nato than ever before. also, mr.ented on the possibility of strikes on the territory of russia with western weapons. well, in particular, again, a large number of publications appeared in the foreign press, which may be related to... ukraine's membership in nato, here is the financial times, several articles appeared there, one today, some articles appeared during the previous days, in particular one of the articles is written about the fact that nato is considering the so-called german model of ukraine's membership, that is, conditionally speaking, we understand that this part, yes, the country can join the north atlantic alliance, including there are also... other statements, in particular, the former already secretary general of nato jen stoltenberg said that ukraine can become a member of nato, even with occupied territories, at least that was the statement, but in addition, let's pay attention to one article of the same edition of the financial times, which today is very actively circulated in is ukrainian. at l

these stabilization efforts such down at nato's new headquarters on the baltic sea. germany's defense minister bull has bestowed loose lands here in the german port city over all stuck to inaugurate the commando task force baltics, a new needle naval command center, the aims to boost the lines of defense readiness in the baltic sea region. it will be responsible for planning joint exercise as ready to direct naval operations and times of peace. crises will crushes. invasion of ukraine has heightened concerns that moscow could attack nato countries. germany and nato have seen an uptick and espionage activity by russia and of warns of other potential threats, especially around the baltic sea region. we must ensure that putting will not have his way. we must defend ourselves and do whatever we can to support our populace enables eastern flight with a new command center participating countries in to better protect the baltic sea. unimportant supply routes for nato, and the key economic area for neighboring countries. so we all the district has and really just and somebody kind of them in

main reasons for the lack of security in the sky of ukraine and, in particular, near the borders of nato, of our neighbors is the lack of decisions about joint work, about joint defense, what works in the sky, the middle east, and helps the defense of israel, can work and in the sky of our part of europe, in ukraine, in the same way, helping to save lives, there are special technical solutions. there is a completely effective tactic, today we talked, in particular, about it with mark ryuta, we will continue to convince all partners that it is necessary to implement what is necessary for effective protection of the sky. there is a reaction from the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian-ukrainian war, the deputy spokeswoman for the pentagon, sabrina singh, said at a briefing: that the north atlantic alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over ukraine, as it does over israel, let's listen to what she said. i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields. from the beginning, when russia invaded ukraine,