nestor shufrych was detained in september.icion of treason, his lawyers are now preparing to appeal this decision. in general, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, eight people's deputies have received suspicions of treason, and six of them are members of the banned pro-russian opposition platform for life, but from the current ninth convocation, there are people's deputies who were also charged with other crimes. who and what are accused and at what stages cases were calculated and analyzed. correspondent of tsn, victoria kovtsun, justification of the russian attack, collaborationism, and ultimately, treason, as well as fraud and bribery, and three dozen parliamentarians of the ninth convocation received suspicions, which is every 13th lawmaker in the verkhovna rada. after february 24 , eight people were charged with treason. six of them are members of the currently banned pro-russian opzh. in particular, these are vadim rabinovych and renat kuzmin, who have already been deprived of citizenship, as well as non-part

well, i want to remind you that until recently , nestor shufrych was the head of the committee on freedomf speech, and if, among the politicians you mentioned above, actually in the pool of the channel, 1.1 or inter, and also here in principle, do not take any product, with a single marathon, there are a lot of questions, why exactly, exactly, this product was ordered, why is this, we are fighting so hard for the fact that, in fact , open tenders, open competitions, and even military procurements, victoria and i work in the corruption committee, we initiated a bill so that non-armed procurements of the ministry of defense, at least in fact informed about how the bidding took place, from whom the purchases were made, so to understand, in this case we really see that the resources that should go to the support of all the channels involved in the formation of a single marathon are distributed quite opaquely, not to mention the fact that the list of channels that join the single marathon is also, well, very strange, and, in addition to the public one, there are only representatives of oligarc

corps take and are handing suspicions to two people who are accused of high treason, they are nestor shufrych dubinskyi, they are sitting in jail, in your opinion, are the ukrainian special services working enough to prevent, and not to state, that nestor shufrych, who for a long time was in power there for 25 years, that he turns out to be a state traitor and worked for russia, the same oleksandr dubinsky , against whom the united states of america announced sanctions, it was said that he works for... agent andrii derkach and for the russian special services, is it enough to just to ascertain, to say, well, they are suspected of treason, whether it is too late and whether the special services could not have done it earlier, so in this situation we are only talking about those persons who occupy particularly responsible positions, these are deputies, this government officials, these are representatives of the security sector, the sbu, in particular, we are talking about knees. or about others , it is the legislative, political, economic, persons who determined the strategy of the state, and p

said today , however, the court rejected the request and extended detention for another month, nestor shufrych was detained in september on suspicion of treason, now his lawyers are already preparing to appeal and in general, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, eight people's deputies have been suspected of treason, and six of them are members of the banned pro-russian opposition platform for life, but from the current ninth convocation there are people's deputies who have been served with suspicions for other crimes, who and what they are accused of and at what stages these cases were calculated and analyzed by tsn correspondent victoria kovtsun. justification of the russian attack, collaborationism, and finally, treason, and also fraud and bribery, and estates, cars and gifts that they forgot to declare, all these accusations against the current people's deputies, at the beginning of the full-scale war, almost three dozen parliamentarians of the ninth convocation received suspicions , and this is every 13th lawmaker in the upper house. after february 24 , eight people's deputies

a big patriotic telethon, which it should be, well, i want to remind you that until recently, nestor shufrych was the head of the committee on freedom of speech, and even if, among the politicians you mentioned... . and here, in principle, do not take any product from a single marathon, there are a lot of questions, why exactly, in fact , this product was ordered from this production, why is this, we are fighting so hard for the fact that, in fact, on prozoro we go to open tenders, on open... tenders , even military procurements, victoria and i work in the anti-corruption committee, we initiated a bill so that not armed procurements by the ministry of defense, at least in fact we would inform about how the bidding took place, from whom the purchases were made, in order to understand, yes , in this case, we really see that the actual resources that should go to support all the channels that are involved in the formation of a single marathon are allocated quite opaquely, not to mention that the actual list of channels that join the single marathon also, well, very strange, but, apart from the p

corps, receive and hand over suspicions to two people who are accused of high treason, they are nestor shufrychndr dubinsky, they are sitting in the dark, in your opinion, are the ukrainian special services working enough to to prejudge, and not to state already that nestor shufrych, who was in power for a long time, there for 25 years, that he turns out to be a state traitor and worked for russia, the same oleksandr dubinsky, against whom the united states of america announced sanctions, talked about that he works on the russian agent andrii derkach and the russian special services, is it enough to simply state, to say, well, they are suspected of treason, is it too late and could the special services have done it earlier, however, in this situation we we are only talking about those persons who occupy particularly responsible positions, these are deputies, these are government officials, these are representatives of the security sector, the sbu, in particular, we are talking about kulidnich and others, these are the persons who fundamentally determined the state strategy, both legislative and

after nestor shufrych went to jail, only two deputies remained in the committee on freedom of speech, and one of them is serhiy shvets. and by the way, how do you feel about opening the parliament to journalists' access to the work of the verkhovna rada? i don't care at all. i am equal. there are both pros and cons. well, personally for or against? i... i say, i want to hear all, i want all arguments to be voiced in the hall, as for, yes and against, and you don't have your position, and then i will form my position, your position regarding the access of journalists to the verkhovna rada, full access should be given, and why is it not given, what to confuse is not the deputies, but the mono majority, we decide repeatedly put the resolution, a- admission, b- broadcast, well, complete openness, what arguments, we do not hear clear arguments, as for security. well, i am like no other a professional in the field of security, which is the same security that is for me, i think, completely, or for any people's deputy it may and should be with ukrainian journalists, but, that is, you as a for

number of issues of access to information that intensified during the war, but of course, when nestor shufrychppointed for freedom of speech, almost all powers were taken away from the committee in favor of the humanitarian committee, headed by nikita poturaev, but there are still huge opportunities in cooperation with journalists, well, firstly, debates for more balanced and effective communication by state bodies, secondly - is to take care of the protection, the rights of analysts to physical freedom, as we see, there is a problem with this, and the protection of their, that is, your professional activity, it is protected by law, but just recently there was another attack, on mykhailo tkach, during the actual performance of his of direct journalistic duties, during a journalistic investigation, in principle, it is very important to have direct communication with law enforcement agencies, so that these cases... do not fade away with the fading of public weight towards them. well, it was such physical pressure on mykhailo tkach, direct pressure, you can say, and nataliya ligachova is the head

in the last two months, from the parliament hall, who is suspected of treason, of course, not nestor shufrych and oleksandr dubinsky will have to defend himself in court and prove that they are not russian spies, or the court must prove that they are russian spies, and when there is a court verdict, then it will be clear whether all the claims are against these two people's deputies, or they correspond to reality, but the question now is, in what way... in your opinion, uh, the ukrainian special services should identify these russian spies in the ukrainian government, because, well, it's absolutely clear that uh... they are and they work for the russian federation, at the highest levels in the state , that is, whether it should be a polygraph, whether it should have a lie detector, or whether it should be some special check of the security service of ukraine, i think that there must be some element of the check, so that it can't be that the 10th year of the war with russia has passed, the second year of the great war, here people's deputies are being pulled out one by one and said that they a

from the parliamentary hall, who receives... suspicion in case of treason, of course, both ne nestor shufrychnd oleksandr dubinsky will have to defend themselves in court and prove that they are not russian spies, or the court must prove that they are russian spies, and when there is a court verdict, then it will be clear, or all the claims against these two people's deputies, are they true, but the question for... now stands as follows, in which way , in your opinion, should the ukrainian special services identify these russian spies in the ukrainian government, because it is absolutely clear that they are, and they work for the russian federation, at the highest levels in the state, that is, whether it has to be a polygraph, or whether it has a lie detector, or whether it has to be some kind of special check by the security service of ukraine, i think that some element of the check must it has to be, because it can't be like that to be that the 10th year of the war with russia has passed, the second year of the great war, and here people's deputies are being pulled out one by one and they a

of ukraine fall, we see how two people's deputies were handed suspicions of treason, they are nestor shufrychnd oleksandr dubinsky, from your experience, here is the information that is becoming known now, could it have been... in the security service before, well, for example, before dubinsky was elected a people's deputy of ukraine, or, well, what about friend shufrych, it seems to me, there can be no questions, because he is always there worked in russia, in my opinion, he did not even come, but in relation to corrupt officials, in relation to those people who hold high positions in power, because a people's deputy is also a high enough position, because a person decides the fate of the state, decides the fate of millions of people, in relation to people collaborators and possible traitors among the deputies, it was the abolition of parliamentary immunity, for which we voted, i voted, that made it possible to clean up the highest legislative body, and it is good that the ukrainian special services have arrived and are acting, the only thing i call for is to quickly conduct open courts, not

after nestor shufrych got into butsygarnia, there are only two deputies left in the committee on freedom, and one of them is serhiy shvets. and by the way, how do you feel about the opening of the parliament, the access of journalists to the work of the verkhovna rada. i don't care, i care . there are here, there are both for and against. well, personally for or against? i, i say, i want to hear everyone, i want. all the arguments, both for and against, and you do not have your own position, and then i will form my position, your position regarding the access of journalists to the verkhovna rada council, full access should be given, but why is it not given, what are the deputies afraid of? not the deputies, but maybe the majority decides this, we have repeatedly put the resolution, and the admission, b - broadcast, well, and for complete openness, what arguments, we do not hear clear arguments, as for security,