you are telling me the "new york times" just wrote an editorial. i think i have to frame the editorial. might be the only good one i have gotten in the "new york times." honestly, for her to have done that was an absolute disgrace to the supreme court. she owes the country, our country an apology. and she owes the supreme court of the united states an apology. it was disgusting. >> governor, he had a spat with the pope and i think he won. because i think the pope sort of backed down on that one. now you have this spat with justice ginsburg. what do you think? >> well, lack, the "the washington post" pointed out that she violated the code of conduct for u.s. judges. more specifically, i think this puts her in a very tough position because a lot of the questions they have to answer have to do with executive branch versus legislative branch. and i think she has put herself in a position where somebody might be pressuring her to recuse herself on those issues. so, if she doesn't resign she might have to think about a lot of recusals. >> seems almost lik

"new york times/cbs" poll showing the race with trump a dead-heat.jennifer griffin. also part two of our in depth look at history of aviation with look at historic adventure of charles lindbergh. the pathway that man blazed. amazing when you see his plane in the air. we'll show you how to do it. next hour. harris: don't let your modesty fly to high. you're a great pilot, jon scott. >> i haven't crashed test. harris: is that the litmus test? >> for some. harris: top. hour, my friend. >> thanks. >> before we do this, can you fix that please? please fix that. >> come on. >> thank you very much. [laughter] kennedy: schmoozer. >> war of words between donald trump and supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg. justice ginsburg saying in a statement she regrets criticizing presumptive nominee in several interviews. trump tweeted previously she should resign. listen to what he told bret baier before her statement came out. >> there is almost something wrong with her. i don't think anybody has ever seen that before. >> are you questioning her mental capacity

i had seen about it priferly, pie reading about it in the "new york times."seemed to me a story that need aid deeper dive. there had been no film about it so i got interested in it and started on. >> rose: and you place a phone call to david and say, "we should talk?" >> we should talk. >> he showed up one day. we the met at a coffee shop who ploks from the white house. he had read "confront and conceal "a book i had written that came out about four years ago that was really about obama's first term but opens with this almost made-for-tv movie scene, where leon panetta comes to the situation room to explain to president obama this warm they had put into the irian centrifuges had somehow done what everybody said would never happen-- it had gotten loose. it had gotten out of the nuclear september and was spreading around the world. suddenly the code was in the hands of the iranians, the russians, the chinese, and everybody else. and it was the panic that came from that, that actually gave me the thread. that happened in 2010-- to do two years of investigation t

when you put out to the "new york times," who by the way decides -- the "new york times" decides shockinglya woman who has the possibility of ending her presidential campaign by indicting her. when they put that out in the "new york times," it just shows how stupid the clintons have always taken us all for being. they think everybody is stupid, and they always have. >> fine. all i'm saying -- >> stop right there. >> all i'm saying is that in the end it didn't matter because comey came out, made his statement and it's over. >> joining us from nashville, tennessee, former attorney general under president bush alberto gonzalez. nbc news correspondent hallie jackson also joins the table. >> whether your reflections on jim comey's decision yesterday? >> you know, surprising, i'd have to say. of course, i have to give him the benefit of the doubt without actually looking at the evidence. given his public statements and what's in the record, i'm a little bit surprised at the outcome. what i'm really surprised about was the statement that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. that is no

i think i'm going to have to frame that "new york times" editorial. might be the only good one i've never gotten from "the new york times." but for her to have done that was a disgrace to the supreme court. and she owes the country an apology. >> here is what she said, first to cnn. "he is a faker, he has no comeso his head at the moment. he really has an ego. how has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns. the press seems to be very gentle with him on that. the "new york times" saying i can't imagine what this place would be. i can't imagine what the country would be with donald trump as our president. for the country it could be four years for the court it could be -- i don't even want to contemplate that. you heard the reference to the editorials. "new york times," donald trump is right about justice ruth bader ginsburg. "the washington post" justice ginsburg's inappropriate comments to donald trump. your thoughts. >> when the "new york times" and "the washington post" side with donald trump, one of two things is happening. either bird

i think i'm going to have to frame that "new york times" editorial. the only good one i've never gotten from "the new york times." but for her to have done that was a disgrace to the supreme court. and she owes the country an apology. >> here is what she said, first to cnn. "he is a faker, he has no comeso his head at the moment. he really has an ego. how has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns. the press seems to be very gentle with him on that. the "new york times" saying i can't imagine what this place would be. i can't imagine what the country would be with donald trump as our president. for the country it could be four years for the court it could be -- i don't even want to contemplate that. you heard the reference to the editorials. "new york times," donald trump is right about justice ruth bader ginsburg. "the washington post" justice ginsburg's inappropriate comments to donald trump. your thoughts. >> when the "new york times" and "the washington post" side with donald trump, one of two things is happening. either birds and fi

i remind you that is the new york times and their poll. monica crowley is with us. inion editor. that is about as good of news as donald trump as you could get. >> yes. and, in fact, that number has tracked with previous polls from other organizations that show donald trump has a lead on the number one issue for most voters jobs in the economy by 10, 12, even 14% i've seen over the last couple of weeks. so on that number one issue, trump has a huge built in advantage. on the number two issue, national security, terrorism, trump either leads or is tied with mrs. clinton. this bodes very, very well for donald. stuart: more on that poll in just a moment as well. because there's more in that times poll, by the way. on this program tomorrow at this time, we will know, and you will know, who is donald trump's chosen vice presidential running make the. now, there's a lot of speculation about this. i don't know who's going to be the pick. what i expect is political theater leading up to it. like a reality tv show is going to say this is the -- it's going to be really interes

was telling you earlier, that experiment generates over night, i think, 1500 comments in the "new york times" asking questions. >> rose: from the first new article. >> from that first new article. >> rose: 1500 over night. >> yes. i read them the next morning, i don't know how quickly they came. but the astonishing thing was the range of opinion. it ranged from some people saying if the chinese are doing this, we have to. we have to start. to there are absolute moral constraints in the west that allow us obviously not to stop any intervention. >> rose: what do you think of the idea that if, that you can't stop science. there's always someone who wants to push every frontier and they will not be reigned in by any government or ethical considerations. >> i think that's an overblown fear. i think we visited these fears before with recombinant dna. i was a student with paul burg one of the inventors. paul and i spoke yesterday on the phone. and he was a great mentor, has been a great friend. obviously this technology was invented not only by him but several people, you know, added to the technol

. >>> more to talk about with this "new york times" interview with mr. trump. finitely sparking some backlash after donald trump says it is possible the u.s. may not defend its nato allies. what exexactly he told the "times" is really significant. we also have the majority leader of the u.s. senate speaking out on this. >>> also ahead, hear from ivanka trump who is introducing her father this evening about why she says he sometimes doesn't listen to her advice. >>> also ahead, disturbing video of this african-american therapist who was out trying to help this autistic client. had his arms up in the middle of the street and ends up shot by police. hears happens, what the officers are saying. you're watching cnn's special live coverage. hey, searching for a great used car? i don't want one that's had a big wreck just say, show me cars with no accidents reported find the cars you want, avoid the ones you don't plus you get a free carfax® report with every listing i like it start your used car search at carfax.com it's built-in backup wbraid helps stop leaks by chan

the "new york times" opinion page reads, donald trump is right.wall street journal" questioned if the 83-year-old justice is fit to serve. jan crawford the there with this extraordinary clash. good morning. >> reporter: good morning, you know justice ginsberg. she has always been one to speak her minds, her comments about donald trump are unprecedented in modern history. we never had a supreme court justice lash out at a leading candidate. even her liberal defenders say her comments went over the line. >> this is all the more reason why i hope i win. >> reporter: justice ginsberg new favorite target. >> i think i'm questioning perhaps her mental capacity, yeah, for her to do that was either a very dumb mistake and she has been criticized by people that would always be at her side. >> reporter: her comments sparked criticism from both sides. >> ruth bader ginsberg calling donald trump a faker, why he hasn't file his tax returns. >> she said, i can't imagine where we will be with donald trump as president. >> reporter: they say she needs to drop the

david sanger and maggie were two writers of "the new york times" who did control a lot of the headlines last night into tonight. mr. sanger has been kind enough to join us following their "new york times" interview with donald trump and, david, did you know when it left the bat that his answer on nato was going to echo throughout the stadium? >> i suspected it would probably have a pretty broad reach, brian. that's because when we talked to him last, which was back in march, he was already discussing pulling back from nato, pulling our troops back if other nato nations did not pay more. so what i wanted to it do in this interview was push him to the next step which is would you defend a country that was attacked by, say russia, the ones that are the most threatened, of course, in the baltics, or would you apply a means test of whether they've been contributing? and it turned out he said he would apply the test. it was a significant departure from, i think, republican orthodoxy going back it to the founding of nato in 1949. >> while some like mitch mcconnell rushed to correct the record

david sanger has been covering the hack for the "new york times," their chief washington correspondentdavid sanger joins me right now from the aspen security forum. here's the front page of the "new york times" today. you contributed to this story, the headline says, "russian spies said to hack clinton's bid." what's the latest, david? >> well, the latest out of that story is that the clinton campaign said that a database that they shared with the dnc appeared to have been compromised. that doesn't mean that the russians got into the clinton campaign tone networks. we know, of course, that somebody, and it's believed to be russia, and u.s. intelligence officials certainly seem to believe it's two russian spy agencies, did get into the dnc. that is a different they think than getting into the campaign's own computer networks. but the broader question, which you raised, michael, and raised rightly, is, we don't know where the bottom of this is. because we don't know what additional material the russian hackers, if the intelligence agencies are right, might have. we don't know how much of

nick joins us from the "new york times." mike joins us, a contributor to msnbc and morning joe. pleased to have both of them. what do we make of this piece you wrote in the "new york times" today about support for trumper. >> mike pence is the safe choice, the complementary choice. not the choice that doubles down on his attributes but contrasts with him. he's the ideological and temperamental inverse of trump. he's calm, mild-mannered in a lot of ways, experienced executive can, a long-time lawmaker and governor, so, really, he is the safer choice, i think, for trump who is looking to persuade people that he's not an outlier, not a viking, so to speak, coming in to destroy the place. >> rose: what do you know about this? >> all i know is mike pence has been on the morning joe program with us several times prior to his being governor of indiana, and i agree with nick. i think it's an effort to calm the waters within the republican party. >> rose: conservatives like him. >> conservatives like him but more importantly for donald trump i think the leadership of the republican party,

also a second part, what they said about what had happened on the ground that night whereas the new york timesd the usa today took a very different approach, basically no problem here, lori is not exonerated, no new evidence to suggest she did anything wrong. this report was not just about hillary clinton, it was about the obama administrations handling of an incident that led to the death of four americans and when you read that report as i started it, i was still working my way through it, when i read that report you cannot help you walk away shaking her head and it's just amazing that that kind of, the number of screw ups and miscommunications and misinterpretations and then of course what i think is the deliberate spinning of what happened on the ground that night, all of that is not really conveyed to viewers and readers in the way in which the times handle it and usa today. jon: here's a sample that was published on the new york times website in the opening minutes after that report was released, lynn. the headline which is not written by the reporter but the headline reads, pardon me. h

but a new investigation by the "new york times" questions the ability of this technology-- and a highfile coal plant-- to deliver on its promise. william brangham has the story. >> brangham: the "new york times" investigation published this week examines problem at the kemper power plant in kemper county, mississippi. it's under construction but the price tag billions over budget and it has a lawsuit by rate pairs who say they have been defrauded. also called into question is obama's reliance to fight climate change. so what is clean coal? >> sort of the promising notion that we can still burn coal but without so much pollution, and behind the promise is the technology that will allow you in different versions to pull carbon out of the emissions from coal plants. >> brangham: so it doesn't get into the atmosphere and drive climate change? >> correct. >> brangham: was the idea the technology is proven but we don't know how to do it economically? what's the question been about it? >> so the technology, as you say is, proven, and we know how to make it work. the challenge is can we scale

he's the one who walked out of -- he walked out because gorbachev required him to give up, the "new york times" used to describe in a very nasty way, the star wars. the "new york times," by the way, is wrong about everything. [ applause ] ronald reagan used to read it in order to do the opposite. i mean it. it's true. now, how stupid can you be not to understand star wars? way back in the 1980s, when the stupid editorial board of the "new york times" and the "washington post" used to make fun of him. just think about this for a moment. if a missile can shoot down an airplane, which it can, correct? a missile can shoot down another missile. if it's a bigger missile, a better missile, a smarter missile, and a more powerful missile. only political ideologues who think that they're right about everything because they sit on the editorial board of the "washington post" or the "new york times" are too stupid to figure that out. now, if you need any proof that it works, look at the iron dome in israel. i had the great -- [ applause ] one of the greatest and most fulfilling experiences of my life was

if "the new york times" is any indicator, my book has been four weeks in a row on the best-seller listrk times" are ready to "wake up america" this november. get your own signed copy at s: n better to see it monday. thank you for watching, here is lou dobbs. lou: i am lou dobbs. the conventions, they are over. and the general election campaign officially underway. donald trump and hillary clinton now have 101 days to make their case to the american voters, their schedules are as you might expect packed. trump heading west to colorado for a town hall meeting in colorado springs, a rally in denver later tonight, colorado sprints even classic trump, taking shots at clinton a dnc speech. >> i watched her last night

amy: i yesterday's "new york post," a very conservative paper in new york. while the "new york times" reported two days ago that wayne isaacs remains on active duty as eric schneiderman's office investigates, "the new york post" releases the headline that video is second damming." basically, he was blown away. it says the cop who has since been placed on administrative leave -- >> i don't know that is true or not. the key question is not whether or not he is been put on administrative leave, he should be arrested. he should have been arrested and he should be arrested at this point. even before the video came out, he should have been arrested because even if his version of events were true, there is no justification for the use of lisle -- lethal force. he said delrawn small was punching him. he was sitting at the will of his car. who could have drove off. he could of done anything short of shooting delrawn small. the video indicates he was lying when he said that and there was even less justification for what he did but it was reflective of an attitude that i could be anything i wan

now paul manafort is saying, hey, that story with "the new york times," that's inauthentic, "the times. one good reason to not lie on tuesday is because you want to be believed on thursday. >> and also there's transcripts. >> that's never stopped them. >> that's right. but there are transcripts that we will read later in the program that are verbatim what he said. there's evidence of what he originally said. they never sort of calculate that into their denial. >>, no and this is a pattern. it's something every republican in that room and every republican politician is calculating before they jump on board the trump train. it's like, this guy is going to swerve off the tracks. >> ultimately, the gop wants to win, right. the only thing they have no doubt about is that they don't want hillary clinton to be president. do you believe that donald trump can come in tonight and do something with his speech that shows, one, he's growing, and two, he's your guy? >> i don't think he will show he's growing, but i think nonetheless, a lot of republicans will probably go, well, he's likely the best

his last two books with us for number one "new york times" dollars. we had high hopes for that. a month later we had a very exciting book by ed kline, also a multiple last time's up there. this book is called guilty as death. a real investigative reporting boat on what is going on with the justice department investigation into hillary clinton and where it will lead. he's really well known for developing wonderful services and getting tories meant 10 months before they break. that is what we are hoping to do in this book as well. >> two controversial authors you >> yes, indeed. greatly in this kind of environment, you need controversial outspoken authors that has a tendency in an election year for them is to be changing so quickly that people can't keep up in an election year. this one is more evolved than any i can remember. so this has been quite a challenge for book publishers. the news changes every day and people are expected to hear what is new every day. our challenge is always interesting, provocative, a point of view that can tell a different side of the story. >> from th

i have seen internal documents, i interviewed one of the women on the record as did the "new york times," and if you see this, bill shine, diane brandy, fox news's general counsel, a lot of those people around roger ailes were fully aware of this culture. they knew exactly what was going on, they did not speak up. >> i spoke with a spokeswoman again this morning who does not have evidence of that. but i did ask the company this morning if this internal review is now being widened and they would not comment on that. and you're saying this is going to spread quite a bit further? >> people i talked to inside the company feel that the only way to change the fox news culture is to move out all the checkives that am moved into position of power. roger ailes deputy played a role in rallying the women to speak out against roger ailes accusers and lead this counter offensive saying don't believe gretchen carlson. if that's the case, the murdocks will have to say these are managers who enabled and tried to protect roger ailes who presided over this culture. >> look, it's clear that there's a cult

the headline and you're getting a lot of people saying there's no new evidence. >> well, "the new york timesde up their mind about a year ago when they call for our committee to be disbanded. >> congressman said he wasn't investigated. what do you think of the consensus, nothing new, old news, no smoking gun? >> i mean, i think they are sort of reporting the facts. there was no smoking gun. startlingly striking newnothing but i will say they also wrote in the times and other places that while there was no smoking gun, it was a pretty broad indictment or rebuke of the defense department, the cia, the state department which hillary ran at the time. so i think there was certainly coverage of the negative aspects of that 800-page report even if the top line was accurately no smoking gun. >> that's a really important point because we had a very broad indictment of an administration but the political question was what new could we learn about hillary clinton personally but do you think the fact that there have been a half dozen other investigations of benghazi set a high bar -- >> and the fact she

"the new york times" described the startling rise in murders in

if "the new york times" is any indicator, my book has been four weeks in a row on the best-seller list. let's hope democrats that read "the new york times" are ready to "wake up america" this november. get your own signed copy at www.ericbolling.com. >>> a fox news alert as a hot air balloon in central texas has crashed. there are at least 16 people onboard with. it's unclear at this point if there have been injuries or deaths or what the situation on the ground is. according to the federal aviation administration, the hot air balloon caught fire around 7:40 this morning and crashed into a pasture neek lockhart, texas, 30 miles south of austin. the weather there hot and clear. there are authorities on the scene of this crash investigating as we speak. >>> good saturday to you. nice to be with you this saturday. >> i'm

questioned by the fbi not too long ago about her knowledge of the e-mail server and we know from the new york times that eight members of the fbi and justice department questioning hillary clinton. >> jennifer you have a great vantage point. what do you make of the timing? >> look at the timing of the meeting on a holiday weekend. that is by design and not it by chance. if you are the hillary clinton campaign, you would want it to happen in a new's cycle when the rest of america is focusing on other things in the 4th of july weekend. that is not a coincidence. the timing is good for it the campaign if they wrap things up before the convention. it is notable. it is not clear if it was arranged after bill clinton's impromtu meeting with loretta lynch. the first statement we with received was from spokesman nick merrill after she was back at her house. he said secretary clinton gave a voluntary interview about her e-mail arrangementes while she is secretary. and she is plosed to help bring it to a conclusion and she will not comment further on her interview. >> she did comment further. she went on ms

i mean, if that was the "new york times," they would have gotten pulitzer prizes for their

she wasn't belle la follette to "the new york times" she was mrs. robert la follette. i put that in and got 708 hits. you have to be thinking in the context of the times. lesson 22. strategic long term thinking usually beats knee jerk reactions. following the death of robert la follette in 1925 a petition circulated among members of the wisconsin legislature asking belle la follette to become a candidate to fill her husband's unexpired term. she could easily become the first woman senator. but she chose not to run. a petition signed by hundreds of women asked, dear mrs. la follette, will you, can you turn away from your heritage, your people your shepherdless flock? those who knew her best thought her refusal to run in favor of her son was a typically shrewd move. a we we author observed belle case la follette will stand as one who ambitious for her husband and their sons was ambitious first of all that their shared ideals of social justice, which were also her ideals, should prevail. according to phil la follette, his mother recognized her term would be granted more as

"the new york times," baby. >> it's 5:00 somewhere. >> where's the wine? where is the wine?rsts. >> look at this. >> where's my salami. >> this is unbelievable. >> the best reading and thinking done. >> i love it, yeah. look, a picture of jasper. >> of course. >> so he'll always be here. that's a pretty grim -- >> i love it. >> skinny pup. that was on our list. diva, j. lo. >> i think i'm calling this seat right here. because i'm the smallest, and i can curl up in here. >> shush. >> maybe i want the hang out here in the back of the bus, right? >> this is nice. i love it. it's very cool in here. i can take a nice nap. >> you know what i noticed? they got pictures of you over here and they got jasper in here. i think this is all about dana. i think this is dana's bus. >> no pictures of juan, though. >> don't worry about it. if it was up to you, i'd be sitting at the back of the bus. >> oh! i try my best, juan. >> i know, i know, i know. >> i love it. i just want to sit close to wherever the salami is. does that make sense? >> that makes sense. >> here's the bathroom. >> greg,

from the "cook political report," mark shields, beloved mark shields and david brooks from the "new york times." let me just say we just heard what peter king said optimistically about being able to get new yorker. we've heard californians say the same thing about donald trump. what's the consensus? >> probably not. at least in new york, upstate new york fits into the trump theory of the rust belt and midwest and that that is the pathf he has one to go to the white house. white collar, blue collar key flip the blue states red. that's their theory. >> not that he wouldn't dearly love to win his home state. >> of course. but the idea is to do that, you can't -- aren't enough blue collar white men to do that. you have to get -- if you're going to get 70% of the white

the loss of the war. >> now med -- my name is chris finkel and my other was a reporter for "the new york times" and he spent six months in spain. >> and what years? >> 38. january to june. and he saw a lot of conflict and he got to meet franco number of times. he covered the franco side and herbert matthews covered the loyalist side but they knew each other well and my father knew hemingway and a great friendship with martha and l. elkhorn and saved her life a half a dozen times because she was reckless. marrying -- married to him in way she had to be. >> that's true. but anyway whenever he was in a battle zone where there were american volunteers captured they made a point to have them rescued because they were going to be shot that's true. there were outsiders and many were naÏve. he actually saved melton wills life once he became head of the abraham lincoln brigade in new york. >> and head of the abraham lincoln battalion in spain and one last story, he saw a battle and a captured 10 american abraham lincoln people and the captain of the spaniards who likes my father a lot and knew he was c

we begin this evening with a report from dallas, from manny fernandez of the "new york times." >> go back to this morning with the chief, and near the top of that press conference, he gave one of the best summaries of what it's like to be a policeman in america today, and what he said, i've heard from other police officers, and essentially the chief was saying we put too much on our officers, we expect our officers to solve too much of society's problems. schools fail, give it to the cops. there's a loose dog problem in dallas, give it to the cops. he went through this whole litany and he said it's too much, he said we can't do it all. and i've heard that from -- worded differently from a lot of different people in law enforcement. and i think that that's part of it. i think it's part of it, sort of thinking about what is it we want our officers to be doing? what is their role, you know, and sort of just acknowledging, like, what we ask of them when we put them on the front lines. >> rose: and we continue with comment and perspective from charles blow, a columnist for the "new york t

i don't see on the front page of the "new york times" and "washington post." i searched the "new york times" home page and found it at the bottom of some menu, should this be a bigger story? >> it should be. i suspect they'll be pressured in to covering it. what is the explanation for it? it's a huge story. you had the bernie sanders people making this accusation for the entire election season demanding she step down, saying hillary should basically get rid of her, and now they have it in black and white. it's incontrovertible. i think it was before that the dnc was carrying water for hillary. now there's no getting around it. >> it was obvious in the debate zedu u schedules and everything else and the disparaging way. i don't like hacked emails, every organization has them. the press is describing the democratic party as being together, unity, a great four days in philadelphia. does this really crack that? >> they had a fight over the big roll of superdelegates. the sanders wanted their power constrained and the clinton folks were fighting that. it's clear the

the boppen scare in new york city's times square. spect throwing a suspicious package right into a police van. officers inside. >>> and just in tonight, a major shakeup at fox news. after the gretche

if "the new york times" is any indicator, my book has been four weeks in a row on the best-seller listhat read "the new york times" are ready to "wake up america" this november. get your own signed copy at >> i'm bob massi. for 34 years, i've been practicing law and living in las vegas, the center of the recent real estate crisis. lives were destroyed from coast to coast as the economy tanked. now, well, it's a different story. the american dream is back. and nowhere is that more clear than the sunshine state of florida. so we're headed from the strip to the beach to show you how to live the american dream. i'm gonna meet real people who are facing serious problems, take you behind the gates of properties you have to see to believe and give you the tips that everyone needs to navigate the new landscape, because information is power. and the property man has got you covered. [ woman vocalizing ]

if you want to applause, you can. [ applause ] go ahead, charles from the "new york times", go ahead,rles. >> let me they unequivocally, the way the stop and frisk was practiced here in new york city was abombedable and ultimately immoral and unconstitutional. [ applause ] there is no way around that. at the height of stop and frisk in new york city, they were stopping and frisking more young black and brown men than there were black and brown, young black and brown men in the city. that meant that somebody was getting more than one stop. that meant that if my two sons got no stops, somebody took a stop or two or three for them. and do not let anyone kind of convince you that this was some polite, officer-friendly encounter. i heard one of the people who was one of the complaints in the case give his account of being stopped and frisked. number one, on something like 90% of the people who were stopped and frisked here in new york city were never charged with a single thing. that meant that they had done nothing wrong, they could find nothing on them, and they let them go. this young m

now tied with hillary clinton in a new general election matchup conducted by cbs news and "the new york timesclinton is stepping up her attacks. she asked parents in a new provocative ad which candidate sets a better example for their kids. ♪ >> i love the old days. you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? they would be carried out on a stretcher, folks. and you can tell them to go [ bleep ] themselves. i could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn't lose any voters. it's incredible. ♪ >> our children and grandchildren will look back at this time, at the choices we are about to make, the goals we will strive for, the principles we will live by, and we need to make sure that they can be proud of us. >> my goodness. >> let me go quickly around the table. i'll start with dana perino and say dana, look at that ad. >> the hillary clinton team is showing they came to play. they're obviously not doing well. she cratered in these polls, and donald trump is not yet rising. that has to give them concern, because we're going into a co

john herrman is here, media reporter for the "new york times." jay rosen, new york university, and melissa bell, vox media. john, how significant has the impact on facebook been? one on consumers and how people get the news and the story tellers. let's start with the consumers, how we get the news. >> it's kind of hard to overstate in the last five years, especially, a huge number of people have, while using facebook, started to treat it as a primary news source. some of this is intentional, some of this is just happening. there's more and more news to read, more and more organizations vying for your attention on the platform. the result has been that over 100 million people in america alone are actively checking a single news source. it's composed of many other news sources, but that is argue pli the largest single outlet in the country and in the world and it's facebook's. >> sreenivasan: isn't that a good thing? a more informed public, more people getting information from perhaps friends they trust saying read this article, this is a great read

that's not something that makes the front page of "the new york times." unthinkable that this is continue to happen. lou: "the new york times" had the audacity to draw in its headline this psychononsense of villain as well as victim talking about law enforcement and this country and by amateur politician major newspaper that once had some reputation journalistically. it has shattered that. >> because we are in a world where the left is driven totally by ideology. it's not about adopting policies that actually work. sureley driven by ideology. they don't give a whit about the ramifications here. this is about remaking the country and the person that sits at the top of this agenda is barack obama he's been driving it for the last eight years. lou: where is he driving us to, mike? there's an objective here. >> there can be an objective to interrupting the status quo. there is a political solution to this. november is but on the way and you know i have pointed out for a year that trump constantly acknowledge his law enforcement in every speech he gives way be

successors have to do video, blog post, tweet, do anything else to carry the platform of the new york times across all the digital access for. so it's not the time that you would have forged johnny apple would have to say i've done my story so let's go eat, drink, and have fun. >> or do your best shot you could with maybe three or four hours of thinking about it, this is what today really meant at the end of the today rather than hears this part of the day in this part of the day. you're never off deadline. >> so to answer the question that been post about the technology and presidential stagecraft, we'll talk about the story of how most important rule advance people have on the protist carryover wall of dimes with you. if you needed to make a phone call to anywhere you had a role at times. and find out people to make that call. and you are right, the thing that i always, one of the things i always did as an advance person may be more than others, i would have a distance we'll that could measure out distances from whatever venue is doing. i would use geometry angle back to my hotel room and