let's begin, start with "new york times." ed the gold standard offed media, everyone in cable tv and networks, other use papers, they read the "new york times." in washington, d.c., it citizene first paper to pick and read with a enormous amount of influence on democrat party, pushing 1619 project, that is pushing the destruction of our youth. what is the new york times? a corporation. what kind of corporation? a diabolical corporation, why? because it is supported some of the most heinous, genocidal movements that mankind has known, did you know that? now you know. i will demonstrate. i demonstrated it in "american marxism," and i did before in unfreedom of the press, let me go outside my own book. and point out here we have a piece of "new york times" help hide stalin mass murders in ukraine. i have written about this, they had a reporter, walter durante, headquartered in moscow for 12 years, stalin's lap boy, on his payroll, stalin would tell him what to write for "new york times," he tried to protect stalin, stalin provide

"new york times" was on the wrong side of all three. covering up for all three the paper record, all of the news that is fit to print. "new york times." this iss important to understan. because the "new york times" has not changed ownership, it is the same family, handed down. their ideology is very un-american. it has been in the past. they don't embrace republican implement they don't embrace the constitution and the declaration of independence, they embrace the spawned american marxist movement, every damn one of them, critical race theory. >> and on on. you read "new york times," you read what the spawned american marx movements have to say, in chapter 6 of "american marxism," i point out that is the "new york times," how corrupt media can be. did you know karl marx in his career he was a journalist. a journalist, let he read this short bit of information to you to have it with the rest, as i write: >> his approach to journalism, as a write. is similar to modern journalists today, isn't it? >> >> i point out in short, in need to con

"the new york times" is on the wrong side of all three. propping up or covering up the paper record that's fit to print this is important to understand because "the new york times" has not changed ownership it's the same family. is very incestuous handed down from one to the next in the ideology is very un-american as it has been in the past they don't embrace in our rights or the declaration of independence that this bond american marxist movement. every damn one of them. critical race theory. the trans- movement. open borders. the attack on capitalism and on and on. read "the new york times" and read what they spine have to say what demonstration is up to i point out "the new york times" how corrupt the media can be. did you know karl marx career was a journalist. you have this with the information a self-described socialist publication noting that marx was a journalist all of his adult life started to write in 1842 and founded his own paper 1848 his work for the new york tribune came about because he met an american and in 1848 a few yea

the new york times in fact reports tonight about what is coming next year. ctually, in very blunt terms. this is what it says tonight in the new york times is reporting on the case. quote, the charges against the trump organization of mr. weisselberg... ushered in a new phase of the district attorney's sweeping inquiry into the business practices of mr. trump and his company. while the indictment was narrowly focused on the tax scheme, the charges could lay the groundwork for the next steps in the water investigation, which will focus on mr. trump. again, that's being reported tonight in those terms about the new york times. the next steps in the wider investigation will focus on mr. trump, quote, in the next phase of the broader investigation into mr. trump and his company, the prosecutors are expected to continue scrutinizing whether the trump organization manipulated property values to obtain a loan taxes and benefits among other potential financial crimes. so, there had been some, i think, discussion is speculation that because bank fraud and insurance fr

we would try our best but it is true. >> you focus on three media companies new york times bloomberg so talk about "the new york times" and your decoder ring. >> they have the list of priorities that they use of that cure ration is the obvious of the front page story and who are the heroes and who are the villains. but i notice that they would get the glamorous photos on the front page and others would get no photo if you're writing on a story that fits the narrative like trump did something bad or coronavirus would ravage all society and feel they could back it up and they put that on the front page input the argument or the piece of information at the top of the article so one example so many outlets word reopen and disney world last summer and then that would create super spreader events so that this is reckless it is horrible everyone will die from this and then it turns out weeks later there was no evidence of any super spreader event than they did not make the front page. eventually they start to trickle out months later and those that are buried within the paper and you start t

one of the former editors of the new york times finishing our program, a fabulous man. >> but it's so interesting to imagine that you were making calls and booking people reporting stories were network new call from the new york times, i used to work there, people answer your call and they call you right back and npr not today obviously were all in that position where that wont be a problem but back then it wasn't the conclusion -- >> i would say what's that? >> would do a little tap dance with every phone call, national public radio and we have 60 stations-they probably hung up. [laughter] >> it took forever. >> you better introduce the other guests. >> who's that great -- [laughter] >> that was douglas the cat. >> welcome. >> he is a large cat. the thing i remember was that we were terrified we did not have any kind of audience and we kept finding -- [laughter] we've got one now. [laughter] >> it was interesting, we would find people, i think we started very little things, that anybody could hear anything and we discovered they were outet ther. one of the things that made a huge dif

"the new york times" reports tonight about what's coming next here. actually, in very blunt terms. this is what it says in "the new york times" on the case. the charges against the trump organization and mr. weisselberg ushered in a new phase of the sweeping inquiry into the business practices of mr. trump and his company. while the indictment was focused on the tax scheme, the charges could lay the groundwork for the next steps in the wider investigation which will focus on mr. trump. that's being reported tonight in those terms by "the new york times." the next phase -- excuse me, the next steps in the wider investigation will focus on mr. trump. the next phase of the broader investigation into mr. trump and his company, prosecutors are expected to continue scrutinizing whether the trump organization manipulated numbers. there had been discussion that because bank fraud and insurance fraud -- manipulating assets to defraud banks and insurance companies and tax authorities, that had been reported as a focus of the investigators. it wasn't included in this indictment. there had been

congrats on the special we will take a look at it. >> thank you, da na. >> next up a new york times reporterfor suggesting trump supporters are enemy of the state. >> the new york times staying silent after a star reporter is caught up in a firestorm for equating trump supporters as enemies of the state. suggesting the solution to combat national security threats are s. to target voters of the former president. the smug and since deleted tweet reads: today january 6th select committee under scores america's national security dilemma work to combat national security threats now entails calling a current politician supporters enemy of the state. the translation is to call supporters of president trump enemies of the state. are you an enemy of the state? i supported trump. >> she is talk ing about 74 million americans. the dehumanization of political opponents through history has not gone or ended well. this isn't the first time we have heard this from a media that claims to be unbias. we have heard trump supporters compared to the taliban in afghanistan. what did we do? we fought a 20 year war

well, small, he says the new york times is intentionally providing state reporting on what happened on january 6. the mainstream media and led by the new york times is really trying to create this fake narrative. they rip the video from my news company that was on my social media, which was actually about a 5 minute video of me reporting about why from supporters. we're going to hear his speech. never did anyone think right. it was ever going to happen that happened the day before, but new york times selectively edited that piece from my video, took a 9 2nd clip out of there to put into their documentary to make it seem like i was the one saying that this is why we're going and all that and to picking me as someone who went to quote, take over the capitol as their headline stated, it, sir, fall from being the 1st on the papers reporting has been called into question on the recently bank tracked on claims that a trump supporter killed a capital police officer with the fire extinguisher. the paper had relied on anonymous sources to support that false allegation, but not didn't stop the d

new york times, bloomberg and nbc universal. talk about "the new york times" and your decoder ring. >> "the new york times" has a list of priorities that they use and with that duration element it's obvious what should be the front page story and the pattern that i lay out about 15 rules and all that i notice they would get these glamorous photos on the front page. and to fit the narrative to fit something bad or the coronavirus will ravage society and you feel like they would put that on the front page and then the argument that fit that narrative at the top of the article but one example eyesight in the book and when they thought florida word reopen disney world last summer than it would have those super spreader events that this is reckless and horrible and everyone will die. and then it turns out weeks later it was no evidence of any super spreader event those stories did not make the front page and then eventually they start to trickle out barely a month later but they're not front-page stories others were buried in the pape

raymond: congratulations opening the "new york times" book? ced the next book, "how i saved the new york times." jesse: dana white, ufc king, steps into the ring. "watters' world" next. [♪♪] if you have diabetes, it's important to have confidence in the nutritional drink you choose. try boost glucose control. it's clinically shown to help manage blood sugar levels and contains high quality protein to help manage hunger and support muscle health. try boost today. i want some premium ideas for land o' frost premium sliced meats. land o' frost premium... so much goodness it'll make you cry! very nice, very nice. land o'frost premium. fresh look. same great taste. jesse: connor macgregor, last week the stars were out. the kardashians, even dave chappelle was there. actor mel gibson saluted president trump when he walked by. connor mcgray gore broke his leg. and it was over. but he got the win. he promised he will be back. jesse: president of the ufc, dana white. the mcgregor factor hasn't had great performances the last year. >> it will take a year

, a runner up for the day in literary peace prize, winner of the medici book club prize and a new york times 10 best books of 2017. lee's debut novel "free food for millionaires" was a national bestseller and on top 10 books of the year lists for the times of london, npr's fresh air and usa today. there will be discussing clint smith's groundbreaking new book, "how the word is passed: a reckoning with the history of slavery across america." in the book, dr. smith recounts his visits to nine sites that memorialize, distort or evade their connections to slavery. from the african-american burial ground national monument in lower manhattan to a confederate memorial chapel to a juneteenth celebration in galveston, texas "how the word is passed" , explores the ways in which america commemorates itself with thorough research and bell like clarity. the new york times praises smith's unapologetically subjective map of american memory as an extraordinary contribution to the way we understand ourselves. i am honored to turn things over to our speakers. the digital podium is yours. min jin: hi! how are

one is that prosecutor's office the other entity is a small reporting entity at the "new york times" that won a pulitzer prize writing about it. they've been writing about how the trump family has spent years aggressively avoiding paying taxes. with us, executive reporter for the "new york times." >> thanks for having me. >> reading the indictment today and knowing what prosecutors said in court do you feel like you saw some of this coming. >> we've been looking at his finances for five or six years. there are a number of issues we saw we think still need to be surfaced. interesting that today it was built more around donald trump's taxes than allen weisselberg's taxes. we saw four or five or six discreet issues i've heard are of interest to the manhattan d.a. one of the things that caught my eye is about a scheme you uncovered was paid this a way that seemed to have paid her income in a way that would have been advantageous. i wonder if you saw those particularly in the later part in that indictment which saw ongoing schemes around the way their compensation was described to authorit

beginning and for us, we didn't have to face the problem you would have to face if he went to the new york timeswe already had our elements. another person had their own -- >> i had the same experience and i would say probably later than you. the last time was early 1980s. >> we were there at the beginning, nobody had to be fired, congressional reporter. they were open and we went into the. there were other people doing that work but they didn't stick around. >> set the scene how it was i really want people to come away with that, it didn't out of the gate become this major force of people tested listened to, you basically were all inventing this one you walk in that door. >> it was interesting for the people listening but they do know quite how interesting it was. i was directing it, all things considered and what happened was the news and i was saying we are is the date? [laughter] adams was in the very early days, the one you could count on being in studio. that wasn't always true but we have no idea what the next would be nobody had any idea what was going on after that. it was supposed to f

raymond: congratulations opening the "new york times" book? lad you announced the next book, "how i saved the new york times." jesse: dana white, ufc king, steps into the ring. "watters' world" next. here are the two battling to the line and allyson felix... simone manuel's above her trying to fight on, and above simone... getting an opportunity to show her stuff. nonstop, displayed at the highest performance level... finding something and the us takes gold! ♪ dream on ♪ ♪ dream on ♪ ♪ dream on ♪ ♪ dream on ♪ - yes! ♪ ahhhhhhh ♪ ♪ dream until your dreams come true ♪ jesse: connor macgregor, last week the stars were out. the kardashians, even dave chappelle was there. actor mel gibson saluted president trump when he walked by. connor mcgray gore broke his leg. and it was over. but he got the win. he promised he will be back. jesse: president of the ufc, dana white. the mcgregor factor hasn't had great performances the last year. >> it will take a year to recover from this one before he can come back. this was a tough game. he cemented a massive

what i've learned i learned at the same time as you have often in the new york time. i am not the best person to question why a book has been dropped or not dropped. then you have ever been before and it makes it that much more difficult. you have to edit a book completely aware. >> e-books have plateaued as a percentage about 25% of all book sales. >> probably a bit fewer for us because people want to books of permanence and they don't want to buy an e-book. it's about culture and upbringing and people want to hold the book. i'm delighted with how well it is doing. we publish you may remember this we had men, women and power before everything and we really work to make books people want to hold in their hand. i know you are outside of the city right now. what has it been like to be an editor-in-chief during the pandemic? >> it had been very difficult because there's no separation between going home and doing something on the side. i found honestly that i'm working 12, 14 hours a day. somehow, it just piled up. i have three or four manuscripts waiting for me that i fe

raymond: congratulations opening the "new york times" book? you announced the next book, "how i saved the new york times." jesse: dana white, ufc king, steps into the ring. "watters' world" next. is struggling to manage your type 2 diabetes knocking you out of your zone? lowering your a1c with once-weekly ozempic® can help you get back in it. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! my zone... lowering my a1c, cv risk, and losing some weight... now, back to the game! ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to

little bit and take us not just through your reporting for this book but also a reporter for "the new york times." how would you assess new york's public healthcare response to this pandemic? you may have some of the most of close knowledge of any reporter in the country and i think you are going to be pretty popular versus as we start to move these investigations into where things went wrong. the city report made that those of color were more likely to be working jobs where they couldn't socially isolate. there were so many people who were not able to shut themselves in at home and isolate. and then on top of that i remember talking with a doctor who also has historians in the book and talking about how he saw all these headlines in the early weeks of the pandemic that kind of blamed their racial disparities are put a spotlight on them and this was something that he had a cms since day number one of medical school and how the racial disparities played out in new york. they were not really even able to focus on protecting themselves because they were focused on trying to find shelter and where t

halfway respectable publication she would at least be reprimanded and suspended but this is the new york timesmob runs the newsroom and the executive editor is a figurehead and bows to their every whim. nothing in terms of accountability will happen. the same new york times that denounced donald trump for calling it the enemy of the people saying it was inflammatory and dangerous. this is why americans rank congress and the media at the bottom of public confidence in a recent poll because of tweets like this exposing their bias in broad daylight. the screenshots are there. we are running out of room to have black eyes. jillian: that's why i don't give my opinion on much because i want to be a news reporter. there's opinion and there's news and if you want to do news it is hard to put out tweets like this and give your opinion on something. that is where a lot of people have mistrust when it comes to the media. look what she says about this tweet and it is interesting because she apologized for it and take credit for the words she wrote. she said i deleted and clearly worded tweets regarding th

even the "new york times" and gone too far and they kind of recanted in the "new york times" original fact checker came forth six months later after she came forward back to the original text and added two words. instead of saying the colonists gauge this rebellion for slavery, they added some. even that is false. none of the colonists did. they never made that threat. we know from newspapers of the time, we know the declaration of independence and correspondence of numerous americans living at the time of the revolution, to our knowledge to this day no one found in american colonists that let's rebel against the british because they will take her slaves away. in fact the british were the biggest slave trading nation in the world. that's where the only complaint the americans had about the british slave trade as they were bringing too many slaves to the new world. this could not have been more false. it is utterly and entirely false. i do know what other adjectives i could put in there. >> what strikes me, let's put it this way, if i wrote something very publicly i was criticized by g

and she -- >> "new york times" bestseller ashley ford. >> yes, great. [laughing] >> every time i see us together instagram on twitter, anywhere, my heart just letters. ashley, who talked to over yesterday, real mvp. one of my dear friends. thank you. >> what a beautiful memoir. hi, , ashley. we love you. and ashley asks, which, if any, of the places you visited during the research would you want to return to? >> good question. >> probably the windy plantation. and they did return to it. so i did my reporting at the place, maybe -- i think it went there in february 2019. and then i went back for thanksgiving 2019 because my family was all in new orleans for my grandmothers 80th birthday. and so part of what we did was we all went to the windy plantation together as a family. i write about my grandparents at the end of the book in the epilogue, and i was there with my grandmother who, , even read the book, part of what a talked about was when she learned that slavery and she was carrying a lot of shame because shipman taught that, they have been taught so

evan hill of "the new york times" is going to explain how they did it next. is going to ew they did it next sadly, not anymore. wow. so sudden. um, we're not about to have the "we need life insurance" conversation again, are we? no, we're having the "we're getting coverage so we don't have to worry about it" conversation. so you're calling about the $9.95 a month plan -from colonial penn? -i am. we put it off long enough. we are getting that $9.95 plan, today. (jonathan) is it time for you to call about the $9.95 plan? i'm jonathan from colonial penn life insurance company. sometimes we just need a reminder not to take today for granted. if you're age 50 to 85, you can get guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance starting at just $9.95 a month. there are no health questions so you can't be turned down for any health reason. the $9.95 plan is colonial penn's number one most popular whole life plan. options start at just $9.95 a month. that's less than 35 cents a day. your rate can never go up. it's locked in for life. call today for free information. and you

>> katie: fox news en townhall.com. >> geraldo: what about "the new york times"? ew york times"! and i trust you, geraldo pay [laughter] >> geraldo: you are a consumer of news, you hear chuck todd's thing there is no liberal bias, give me a quantity percentage of liberal to conservative biases. >> jesse: unscientifically i would say 95%. i think that's about right, unscientifically. i think he's going through a midlife crisis. something i'm familiar with. >> geraldo: i thought yours was over! >> jesse: thankfully. remember tim russert had me suppress -- 4 million watching on sunday. now chuck has it, barely 2 million in third place. and his show on msnbc, it barely get 700,000 people, okay? they had to bump it because it was so poorly rated. it is ranked 30th, geraldo. he's losing the people i've never heard of. he's losing to a guy on msnbc named ayman mohyeldin, someone i've never heard of. he struggling to understand why people don't like him. he's blaming other people. you don't like you because you don't trust him, because he was wrong on donald trump in 2016,

i commend "the new york times." they did a great job on it. anyway, the effort to fight this wave of voter suppression and republican election rigging is strong and growing. i want to be very clear about that. in texas, where the republican governor has called a special session to reconsider one of the most restrictive voting laws in the nation, democrats are doing all they can to block the dangerous partisan bill. they are brave, they are bold, they are courageous, and history will show them on the side of right, and the republican governor, i saw him on tv this morning, on the side of deep, dark, ugly wrong. many of these lawmakers from texas have come to washington. i will be meeting with a group of them today. it's a flat-out strategy and to praise them for what they are doing. president biden will also address the issue of voting rights in a major national address in philadelphia, using the bully pulpit to draw the nation's attention and announce ways in which his administration can defend americans' fundamental rights. and next week, sen

11:00 hour, jesse waters will be joining us, his book how i saved the world, it is top of the new york timestseller list and jesse will grace us with his presence at 11:00 this morning. this is a very important

earlier in the world wide web she covered the intersection of technology and culture at "the new york times" on msnbc and for public radio's marketplace. a chance to help start a radio station to the first book what i learned on my journey to the heaviest kingdom on earth. her biography is titled the man who made the mcdonald's fortune and the woman who gave it all away. her third book is up all night, ted turner, cnn and the making of 24 hour news. i am very pleased and honored to welcome our three special guests, susan stenberg, nina and linda with cokie the four founding mothers of the title. susan who's been with npr since the network began in 1971 is the first woman to anchor a nightly news program and has won every major award in broadcasting. she was inducted into the broadcasting hall of fame and radio hall of fame beginning in 1972 stenberg served as coast of npr's award-winning newsmagazine all things considered for 14 years. she then hosted weekend edition sunday and now cultural issues for morning edition and weekend edition saturday. well known for herrs conversational style, i

why is this worthy of talking about in the context of the modern-day "new york times"? >> in some cases it is so extreme just so over the top and they've not been retracted. >> and she did to some of those while a staffer. >> were right before. it's purely a hypocrisy angle and i point out that breitbartcr has been sending claims that were anti-somatic despite having orthodox jews who edit the site and jews who own the company. and just admitted bias towards israel 100% of the time. it's been enabled by the establishment press who does employ people who've had these w thoughts in the past and haven'u had to address them. so i don't think that he should have been fired. i didn't call for his firing nor did anyone at breitbart but to point out that they pose as an authority on anti-semitism when they employ people like that and they are calling the balls and strikes they portray themselves as a neutral umpire of what is going on in america and international life and a it's nt true, they are not neutral at all. >> in those circumstances are you not to contributing to the o

raymond: congratulations opening the "new york times" book? e new york times." jesse: dana white, ufc king, steps into the ring. "watters' world" next. there's an america we build and one we explore. one that's been paved and one that's forever wild. but freedom means you don't have to choose just one adventure. you get both. introducing the wildly civilized all-new 3-row jeep grand cherokee l jesse: connor macgregor, last week the stars were out. the kardashians, even dave chappelle was there. actor mel gibson saluted president trump when he walked by. connor mcgray gore broke his leg. and it was over. but he got the win. he promised he will be back. jesse: president of the ufc, dana white. the mcgregor factor hasn't had great performances the last year. >> it will take a year to recover from this one before he can come back. this was a tough game. he cemented a massive legacy for himself and made a lot of money. we'll see how the rest of his career plays out. jesse: he said, my leg had issues and people knew about that. >> he had ankle issues

times has decided the flag has become divisive and alienating. joining me now is james golden, longtime sidekick and now with his own magnificent show on wabc new yorkntroversial, the flag is controversial, the national anthem is controversial, there's not a lot left, is there? >> there is an bear the surprising thing is "new york times" a few weeks ago, one of the editorial board members actually raise the same issue that she was afraid or something or another because she saw an american flag on a pickup truck on long island and she felt so displaced and so unnerved. "the new york times" at that point tried to cover their tracks and say no, they tried to walk it back. two weeks later, here they are echoing the same sentiment that the american flag is somehow divisive. it's stunning. >> mark: what i love about that piece in "the new york times" about long island and seeing these strange people with flags and everything is she is riding about it as if she is making an expedition to the jungles of new guinea. he would have no idea that she lives in the same country as these people and you have to ask yourself particularly on independence day, sure, yo

in the eastern district of new yore for potential criminal prosecution as a foreign agent.a "new york times" was first to report that in the summer of 2019. well, now almost exactly two years later it is, in fact, that u.s. attorney's office in the eastern district of new york that has, in fact, brought a prosecution today against, in fact, tom barrack for, in fact, allegedly being a secret foreign agent. i don't know why it took two years for mueller's criminal referral of tom barrack as a potential foreign agent to produce an unsealed indictment to that end, but two years almost to the day since that was first reported here it is. in the indictment unsealed today, prosecutors allege that the people tom barrack showed that draft speech to during the trump campaign might have been redacted in his fbi notes from the mueller investigation, but in the indictment they spell it out. they say the people who he showed the draft speech to were representatives of a foreign government, representatives of the government of the united arab emirates. they allege that tom barrack would go on to run the t

the "new york times"'s barringer, exposes. assault on american history, institutions and traditions. or the dominant white culture if you will, including her own employer and publisher the "new york times," like in 1619 project, she writes: >> thus, folks, the war on the traditional teaching of history begins the change throughout academia, we can't trust what has been written, it las been hn written by bias individualed who are too pro america, and later you will see are white, no nothing they write could be trusted. and saying: >> professor, who teaches english at university of pittsburgh calls herd a marxist feminist, and professor at university of california davis, designs marxist market driven economics, and eric owen wright at university of wisconsin, calls himself an analytic marxist. while barringer's expose is quite accurate, and consequences are manifest today in modern america, the so-called brash marxist, still exists, their numbers are growing on campus and the society culture and government. i said this would be a

where is "the new york times" on this? is reporter that tweets don't die, dude? dagen? >> dagen: this is the modern day left wing media. they don't report facts. they bring an agenda, their own imagined morality. that is what they bring to their job. they tell you what they think you need to know. she's just picking up on the messaging that we heard from the left during the election in 2016 and last year. if you vote for donald trump, you are a ignorant hick, nazi. that's exactly what her message was in that tweet. >> harris: it's such a breakdown in one's ability to debate the issues. right? just call the other side names. >> dagen: there's no debate with them. >> harris: you're right. >> dagen: you're wrong and she's right. >> harris: your family is beautiful. move on. paging homer simpson. a new study finds that beer drinking might be good for you. wait a minute. my floor crew is shouting. the details on tap. no kidding. it says that in the prompter. ♪♪ veteran homeowners. newday usa has dropped their rates again. the ne