not too long ago, the publisher of the new york times, was asked if he thought that the new york timescould still come out on paper, on newsprint, in five years. and he said, he thought that it probably would. and then they questioners -- ten years? he wasn't so sure. the economic models work, it's changed a great deal, and again put a great deal of the burden on the reader or the viewer. >> absolutely, what you say is entirely entry, not to contradict it all, i think it's also true that the new york times has taken us through an amazing renaissance of creativity, i see what they do with their online resources. instead of having a little bit of real estate on the front page, now that could put a great deal more in front of me for the world, for the opinion, for the metropolitan, for the sports, for of course the front page. and i can search it all, i can click on the video, and i can click on the live links, and i get a much greater experience. i was the guy who used to stay up after midnight when i lived in georgetown so i can buy one of those very big seven-pound sunday times. and ta

not too long ago the publisher of the new york times. was asked if he thought the new york times would still come out in on paper on in print newsprint. in five years and he said he thought it probably would and then they question her said 10 years. he wasn't so sure. the economic model simply doesn't work. and so it's changed a great deal and again put a great deal of the burden on the reader or viewer. absolutely and what you say is entirely true not to contradict it all but i think it's also true that the new york times is taking us through an amazing renaissance of creativity where i see what they do with their online resources instead of having a little bit of real estate on the front page now they can put a great deal more material in front of me for the world for the opinion for the metropolitan for the sports for four, of course the front page and i can search at all and i can click on the video and i can click on the live links and i get a much greater experience. i was the guy who used to stay up after midnight when i lived in g

"the new york times" doesn't tell us. "the new york times" tell us whether ray epps' had any contact with any federal agencies in the period before january 6. the core question. but they didn't ask it. why is that? seems like a major omission. but don't ask more questions, otherwise ray epps may be killed by mexican drug cartels. mexican drug cartels? what did they have to do with this? we are not sure, but according to the paper there are people have heard "some cartel members talk about killing mr. epps." right, because the drug cartels are committed trump voters and they feel betrayed by ray epps? maybe they are queuing on people too? this is highly strange, and if you're going to spend more than a year looking into january 6 and you ignore this, then it's more than strange. it's an indictment of your motives. one of the reasons this piece was first written, the editor of robber news, which published the first stories about ray epps. i was leaving "new york times" is very worried about his reporting and we are happy to

have become increasingly opinionated and as jill abramson the former executive director of the new york times said and top editor i quote her in my book that the news pages of the new york times became and washington post. we're distinctly anti-trump. that's wrong. and when people inside the media say that about themselves, yes, i'm going to amplify their voices and i'm going to blow my whistle because it's not good for the country. well, i i can very easily and proudly wear two hats one is working for the company that i run a sports company and two being a student and observer of the american media. i have a lot of experience in the ladder a lot of experience in the former and what i've seen in the media is what led me to write this book. i want the media to do better. i want the media to be credible. i want more conservatives to go into the newsrooms. i want newsrooms to have a booster booster shot of independent thought it would be so helpful to the press if they weren't so like-minded if it wasn't a 12 to one ratio at the white house. this is what journalism needs, you know, i've twice ki

trump's response, this is good, the failing new york times is down 40% year to date because if they aree news. their reporters are dishonest. they hate our country. "the new york times" is truly the enemy of the people. now, of course the media would be committing hall practice if they didn't report on -- malpractice if they didn't report on biden's awful poll numbers or whether the hill hearings have hurt trump. but trying to muscle candidates out of the presidential race and more than two years early, if they're damaged, they think they can't win, maybe they'll decide against running. but too many in the news media are acting like mob bosses and are sacrificing what remains of their credibility. i'm howard kurtz, and this is "mediabuzz." ♪ ♪ howard: ahead, ari fleischer with the details and devastating look at media bias and snobbery. there's been plenty of television coverage of the concerted media campaign against joe biden and donald trump with numerous segments quoting "the new york times." >> i guess the bottom line is it's not biden -- if not biden, then who? >> the future of th

the new york times doesn't tellw us , nor does the new york times tell us the has had any contact with any federal agencies in the period before january six . that's the core question. butio they can ask it. a why m is that? seems like a major omission, but don't ask more questions. come in. the new york times.ise ray otherwise, rapp's epp may be kid by mexican drug cartels. mexican drug cartels. where they have to do with this, we're not sure. butto according to the paper, there are people who have heard, quote, some cartel members talking about killing mr. epp's rights because the drug cartels are committed trump voters and they feel v betrayed by wrap's maybe they're calling on people to . is is highly strange and if you're going to spend more than a year looking into january 6th, and you ignore this, then it's more than strange. it's an indictment of your motives. there is one of the reasonshe this piece was first written. he's the editor of revolver news, which published the first stories about raft's obviously the new york e e times are veryim worried about his reporting. we're h

"the new york times," they said they were not being treated fairly by "the times."ike appearance before little different. >> harold: democrats and republicans the best you can do as a politician don't make it about yourself. as much as this young congressman i applaud her victory, she beat a democrat with a low turnout, democrats don't kill yourself that race does matter, but when you focus on the voters and the things that you want to differ, you want to make schools safer. give us animate us with your emotion out about "the new york times," calling you or suggesting -- not giving you the coverage of aoc. the people in your district want you to represent them. lay out what you plan to do. just say "yes." >> jesse: i'm concerned about election integrity, sorry. >> dana: liberals and democrats are telling her, this american congresswoman born in mexico, they are telling her to go back to mexico but nobody else. >> greg: that is funny. i think they are mad because had she been a democrat, they would be parading her around like a clydesdale horse. and if you kind of lo

" poll them at "the new york times" has biden's approval and a dismal 33%. biden underwater with nearly every demographic including young voters and independence. the paper record itself, "the new york times," they appear to be turning on biden running yet another anti-biden piece this weekend. the article titled "at 79, biden's testing the boundary of age and the presidency" going into great detail about how the white house staff is in a full-fledged panic about biden struggles. the piece reads "he often shuffles when he walks and the aides are worried he will trip on a wire." he stumbles over words and they hold their breath to see if they make it to an end without a gaffe." it comes as democrats and president continue to play one blame game after another. they blame it on the pandemic, russia, russia, vladimir putin, and then rich people. big oil, gas station owners, fox news, donald trump, every republican. biden tweeting republicans are doing nothing but obstructing our incredible and heroic efforts to crack down on gas price gouging. lower food prices,

"new york times," you're killing people. ck and watch and think "the new york times" has become a transphobic greg, this thing must be nearing a conclusion. "new york times" has become a trans transphobic rag. >> greg: kat, i consider you a feminist. >> i don't hate myself. i don't hate myself because i'm a woman. i hate myself for other reasons. >> greg: i'm curious about pregnant man. who impregnates them? >> wasn't me. you're not getting me on that one. >> it's okay. i understand. well the penis havers. i'm not canceled. you say something reasonable like the penis haver impregnates the uterus haver. >> greg: that's exactly what you say. that's fantastic. >> i sure am. [applause] >> greg: i am most feel like sharing my award with you. >> they will never let me share these things on "fox & friends." [laughter] >> greg: tyrus, last word. as an athlete come as a wrestler, have you ever considered wrestling with children just to win? like the male to female skateboarder who has all his stuff intact and is still beating up skate

tell the democratic party line 2 of the 3 most influential papers, at least historically the new york times. and the washington post are virtually democratic party, broad sheets, and the new section of the wall street journal liens in the same direction. nearly all television network and cable is a democratic party trumpet. the pulitzer board will not even release a public version of its review. and show how exactly they came up with the conclusion. that story is full of factual errors. we're still award winning journalism. this comes as trust from mainstream media among the u. s. public is sinking new polls indicate that only 16 percent of the u. s. public trust the newspapers and only 11 percent trust the tv news with awards being given out for fake news stories like this. that's hardly surprising. caleb martin, r t new york, an attorney and a conservative activist at martin says the pulitzer prize has lost its credibility because it focuses on reinforcing the democratic parties agenda polish your board. they say they undertook an investigation, but no one believes it. i mean, look they'v

"the new york times," there were articles about it.the very idea that there was no one thinking about involuntary servitude as being consistent with involuntary reproduction is just absurdist. it was written about everywhere. everyone knew this as being one of the devastating effects of american slavery. and it was abolished with the 1h amendment. and then later on, with the 14th endment, it was still recognized that black women were psychologically, physically, and reproductively still being harmed in southern states. their children were being denied citizenship. their children were being snatched and taken away from them. and the 14th amendment s therefore then ratified. the piece goes into depth in all of these tegories to give an education to the supreme court and to our country to remember this, because otherwise, black women have been essentially erased from the constitution. and by erasing black women from the constitution, we ultimately erase all women from the constitution because the 13th amendment and 14th amendment not only

"the new york times" sent this l.a. d reporter to the rio grande valley to write a hit piece about the new republican congresswoman maia florez. saying that she embraces the extremes while shunning moderates. she's a far right latino they say about her. you have to ask yourself what's so extreme? her campaign slogan i suppose because it was "god, family, country." it was meant to appeal to what she calls the traditional values of her majority hispanic district. it's all smearing. these people pretend to care so much about the set of minorities in business of education, society, politics but unless minorities told me far left democrat line, they're going to be smeared. here now to respond to the hit piece, congresswoman maia florez. great to see you tonight. i think you have officially arrived, welcome to the club. people who have been smeared by "the new york times," how does it feel? >> i honestly don't really care about "the new york times," they know nothing about me or my culture. we are all about god, family, and co

people help the new york times responsible for that decision because the new york times made an individualized decision this particular piece of content was worthy of amplification and being published under its banner and i don't think anybody has tried to hold facebook or anybody thinks about content published on facebook in the same way. yes people hold facebook response will for content moderation decisions for abstraction but nobody holds facebook responsible for the post i put up on facebook this money so i think those are two different things and i think the question we need to ask is whether the different matters to the first amendment and if it does, does it matter in the sense that one is protected and the other isn't? that is not my view or does it matter in the sense that some relationship of editorial judgments constitutional in one context, it wouldn't be in other contexts? relation imposed on traditional media organizations related to the publication of office might be unconstitutional but at the same renovation might be constitutional in respect to social media platforms and i t

"the new york times" reporting that u.s.ing out of ammunition and cannot sustain its offensive pace. really? could press be falling for an overly rosy assessment here? >> there's no doubt russia has expelledded a lot of both missiles, manpower and everything else, but but they're also able to refit if it, and we've heard reports of russians using civilian factories to stay this in this fight. so i think there is a bit of overoptimism that russia's going to run out of missiles. they clearly are having to use with older, less precise weapons according to the british defense ministry that gives us an update every day. but will it be enough for ukraine to turn the tide? i just don't see that. howard: reports in the last major eastern city, that province has fallen. so i don't want to see the vietnam syndrome where the press is told that everything's going great. >> we'll see. time will tell. howard: all right. that works for a whole lot of stories, but particularly on this one. griff jenkins, thanks for doing double duty for us

we had an entirely different show planned for tonight but a big news story just broke in the "new york times." the former fbi director james comey and his former deputy, andrew mccabe, both of whom president trump saw as enemies, well both of them faced rare supposedly random but highly intensive irs audits. you may remember back when the then fbi director james comey oversaw the early stages of the fbi's investigation into ties between the trump campaign and russia, in the summer of 2016. with questions swirling about those ties as trump took office, comey dropped a public bombshell in the early days of the trump presidency. >> i have been authorized by the department of justice to confirm that the fbi, as part of our counter-intelligence mission, is investigating the russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the trump campaign and the russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and russia's efforts. >> it would later be revealed t

that reporter was new york times michael schmidt. i'm not sure if there's any other trump enemies that underwent intensive audits by the irs, but if they, are in their listening, please email my next guest, michael schmidt. he is the reporter for the new york times who broke this story. michael, thank you for joining us this evening. we mentioned this particular type of audit as exhaustive and exhausting. can you help us understand how much an audit like this makes the irs ask for, and how much work it is to provide all of the material that they need? >> most audits that the irs do, is set up by an algorithm, or computer that catches something weird in your return. somebody claims a 500,000 square foot home office, there is something weird. the computer says, hey, and they send you a letter, they say what is going on with this home office? can you help clarify that? you have to explain that individual issue. that is what most audits look like. they are annoying, people don't like, them they see them as invasive. but they are part of

we go to the new york times _ next question. we go to the new york times. . .. next question. question. we go to the new york times. ., ,, i. ., ., ,, , times. thank you for taking my question- _ times. thank you for taking my question. given _ times. thank you for taking my question. given this _ times. thank you for taking my j question. given this emergency times. thank you for taking my - question. given this emergency that you are _ question. given this emergency that you are declaring. _ question. given this emergency that you are declaring, can _ question. given this emergency that you are declaring, can you _ question. given this emergency that you are declaring, can you give - question. given this emergency that you are declaring, can you give us. you are declaring, can you give us an update — you are declaring, can you give us an update on— you are declaring, can you give us an update on the _ you are declaring, can you give us an update on the effort _ you are declaring, can you give us an update on the effort you - you are declaring, can you give us an update on the

"the new york times" is highlighting that.s after an horrific mass shooting on the fourth of july, president biden flew to ohio for a speech about pension plans. joining me is robert gibbs and an msnb political analyst and mike memoli. mike, is the white house addressing the mismatch between frustrations, shall we say, among some fellow democrats over how he has reacted to the gun decision, the abortion decision, the choreography, if you will, and, of course, the reaction to what happened on july 4th? >> andrea, i would say there's shared frustration inside the west wing as they hear this friendly fire coming from their own party questioning whether the president is the right person for the moment. they sort of discount it on one level. this is the same white house staff that was the biden campaign staff that heard that he is not as progressive as elizabeth warren or not as that he is not as progressive as elizabeth warren or not as fiery as bernie sanders, not as young as pete buttigieg and could win the nomination. they disc

if you are saying you want to destroy the washington post and the new york times didn't screw you. am not changing my journalism to try to appease you, someone who is not interested in a public square and not interested in fact-based journalism. we spent so much time in our industry trying to appease lunatics and stead of just telling the truth. >> i will come back in a second. >> the insanity of social media is that you are attacked constantly by people who don't know what they are attacking you about. >> have you read the article? >> that should be the standard response. those people are not media critics, they are basically people looking for reasons to vent and they are finding it every day. i think what we can and should do is become more transparent about what we do. you asked how you engender trust and i think there has been too much in my career as a journalist -- too much has been shrouded in secrecy. it has been -- it has been done in a dark, back room. i think we need to be more transparent about how we do what we do, what resources are, where information comes from and w

the conversation, and i both left our positions at bloomberg where i was ceo, and then at the new york timesboth of us, after several decades, had built global news organizations from the economist to buzzfeed to the atlantic. two bloomberg. we have been in the trenches of global news media. when you are in the trenches building and trying to innovate, you realize the existing global journalism business was really built decades and even centuries ago for a very different time. the design and the architecture of this news environment was very much created before the remarkable and truly existential changes of the messaging of the media world that is only 15 or 16 years old. it is a big part of why we are excited to invent and create something new. most critically, in 2022 news readers all around the world are overwhelmed by too many choicesy choices, too many options, information overload, and no longer sure of what to trust. the news trust deficit, as our friends have chronicled, is at an all-time low. the combination of this older system and very concerned news consumers, for us, we believe

same new york times. suddenly asked a question, but not whether biden is too old for his position as an answer to the author, it seems unambiguous that he often shuffles his feet when walking and assistants are afraid that he will stumble, he makes mistakes during public events and assistants are breathing. if he gets to the end of the speech, without reservation his speeches can be empty and dull. sometimes he loses his train of thought, having difficulty naming names and looking confused more than once. he promoted kama-luharis, calling her president. harris. biden, tripping on words like kleptocracy, he said iranian, meaning ukrainian before the biden, reagan was the oldest leader, but under him the country was on such an upswing that even the always democratic voter came out with a majority, for the second term of the republican president, now the picture is the opposite of an economic crisis and a scandal every week from the last agency. reuters has found that us oil reserves are leaking to a country

new york times. york times, writes that biden's age is becoming an uncomfortable problem both for himself and for his team and for his party, the environment notes, as the politician has passed recently, biden often shuffles when walking and assistants fear that he will stumble , and the wires he stumbles over words during public events and assistants wait with bated breath to see if he can read to the end without blunders, if biden holds another company in the twenty-fourth year? will ask the country to elect a leader who will be 86 years old at the end of his tenure 64% of voters think biden is too old to run for a second term, he has already announced plans for re-election, but judging by the smirk of vice president harris and she does not believe in that the desire of the boss coincides with his capabilities. listen to president biden. he 's going to run. if he goes, i will go with him and loyal to the democrats. media and themselves the president's party members are trying to delicately ignore an

according to the new york times, a spokesperson for donald trump said he had no knowledge of the auditss, quote, the miniscule chances at the two highest ranking fbi officials who made some of the most politically consequential law enforcement decisions in the generation, being randomly subjected to a detailed scrap of their taxes, presents an extraordinary question. and i might add, to high-ranking fbi officials who had a hand and investigating donald trump. two men who probably, definitely, were high up on trump's list of enemies. it's a long list indeed. as msnbc steve bannon put it, history may not be repeating itself, but it sure does rhyme. repeating repeating itself, i mean, "riders" is cool, but "bikers"...is really cool. -seriously? -denied. can we go back to meeting at the rec center? denied. how do we feel about getting a quote to see if we can save with america's number one motorcycle insurer? should flo stop asking the same question every time? -approved! -[ altered voice ] denied! [ normal voice ] whoa. (woman vo) sailing a great river past extraordinary landscapes into th

i am very happy that there are twelve hundred people working in the new york times news new york times news room. but you don't want. a situation where too elite news organizations or three or five are the gatekeepers for what news gets gone after and what news you should see and as an illustration of that i wanted to show you what happened on- halloween and twenty six and- which of. today when your time is published a story on the left. in mother jones published a story on the right. and had that that to me is a real illustration of how you want many different voices and many different perspectives. and the great news is those are starting to happen. that collage look you know mother jones is just of one of the tiles over there on the right there are now more than two hundred nonprofit news organizations all over the country i'm sure there's one where you live there are ones you know focusing on particular issues there are ones focused on particular community there are ones have to. is there when. the there are in total of two thousand people now working in nonprofit newsrooms all ove

for "the new york times" to ask the polling question tells you all you need to know where the professional and hard left is right now. "new york times" did everything it could to get joe biden elected and get rid of donald trump as president. including pretending that the hunter laptop was russian disinformation and nothing to see. they did everything they could. their own polling, the questions they choose to put in the polling tells you there is an urgency among the hard left, professionals to get rid of him. biden white house is in a fight with elon musk and jeff bezos. you won't win the fight. biden saying look at the jobs i created. the second half of 2022. the mid-terms will be a disaster. we're six weeks away from the afghanistan pull-out. all joe biden. he didn't listen to the generals and left $85 billion of our intelligence and equipment turned it over to the taliban. then you will have people who are job holders facing homelessness not just gas and grocery and inflation on everyday consume sooum abls. they won't be able to afford payments, rent and mortgage. that's the next big

and the new york times reviews jody rosen's history of the bicycle saying that the two wheeler has quote aided insurgencies of every kind and magnetized political opinions. and when it comes to current best sellers the new york times list includes james patterson's autobiography and bill o'reilly and martin dugards killing the killers. also on the list former obama communications director dan pfeiffer for his take on conservative media. the book is called battling the big lie and another book on the list fox and friends weekend host pete hegseth with his book on education policy battle for the american mind. now most of these authors have or will be appearing on book tv. well, thanks for joining us on about books a podcast and program produced by c-span's book tv. you can listen to it and the entire library of c-span podcasts on the c-span now app or wherever you get your podcast. it

it was in the new york times. washington coast. people magazine. you get the point. l to tell an audience that they are not worth your time. you will not talk to them. what does that say about the leader you are in the president you will be? >> thank you for joining us. >> thank you for having me. >> the justice department investigating donald trump. ♪♪ howie: the league first to the washington post and then the new york times at the biden justice department is investigating the role of trying to overturn the election has been a bombshell. >> how would it look if joe biden's attorney general indicted donald trump who would be running against joe biden for president? >> it would look really bad. winning the presidency to million and millions of americans. i don't know, the map seems pretty clear. many of us feel they should have taken this month ago. >> covering the white house for fox news. it is pretty clear that many in the media are rooting for the justice department to bring criminal charges against donald trump or demanding. aren't these some of the same people t

new york times i guess i'm qualified. my ego would not let meh, declid to "new york times." so i wrote an op-ed for "the new york times" entitled the boys are not a right which explained that question why, why when it comes not only to gun violence. violence in general do we just assume correctly that it is male people who are instigating. that op-ed came out and it went as the kids say viral publisher contacted me and said would you like to read a book about this and once again i said i really don't think i'm qualified to do athat. i had a meeting with thesew, publishers and i'm just a jerk who shows up sometimes. i do commentary about cabbage patch kids. i don't really think i'm the guy you want for this. i'm a college dropout and i dropped out of college to be a teenage mutant ninja turtle. i don't have the resume that necessarily lends itself to a deep dive into masculinity. so the woman who would become my publishers as well all of that may be true. at the same time why not you? and that was rhetorical. it was one of

"new york times" writing at 79, biden's testing the boundaries of age and the presidency.n for a second term but his age has become an uncomfortable issue for him and his party. let's bring in byron york, i guess it was not unpredictable that things would come to this point, considering the president's age. >> it's never been a secret. i will say that testing the boundaries of age is a very diplomatic way of saying he's too old to be president and it's clear a lot of americans are worried about that. this was the world's most predictable problem because everyone knew during the presidential primaries and election that joe biden would turn 80 in his second year in office. what was kind of newsworthy about this is the "new york times," among democrats, is perhaps the most in influential media organization would come out and say this so frankly. they talked to biden's age who said, for example, that the president's trip to the middle east this week was supposed to be part of his trip to europe last month, but they all decided putting the two together would just be too taxing

collect information on the russian armed forces, according to officials who commented on the new york times condition of anonymity, western teams are not on the front lines with ukrainian troops, but advise from headquarters located in different parts of ukraine. of course, this is done in secret over encrypted communications. by the way, the activity of the americans in ukraine is not hidden. even some officials not so long ago the secretary of the us army kristin wormuth stated that the us special operations group is helping with the coordination, flow of weapons and equipment in the budget. e united states military budget. uh, an article on uh, how to conduct an operation of covert operations, to conduct operations to maintain democracy, to counteract authoritarian regimes in countries and so on, that is, from this. here is the wallet paid, in addition to this, all intelligence agencies have their own budgets, for example, the national security agency of america which is combined with cyber the command has the biggest purse, but which allows you to pay not only for the technical structur

the "new york times" says slightly less than half of all republicans now support mr. trump running again. florida governor ron desantis is a distant second at 28%. one in five voters believe mr. trump went too far trying to cling to power. now fox was told that these hearings are essentially a preimpeachment. there is also concern that mr. trump could cost the g.o.p. the senate. bill? >> bill: that again still to come if that comes to it. chad, thank you from the hill tonight. mexico's president meanwhile saying that both he and president biden need to be bold in order to fix a broken immigration system. their meeting today comes after president biden was snubbed just about a month ago in california. senior national correspondent rich edson has that story tonight from the white house. >> despite the overhyped headlines that we sometimes see, you and i have a strong and productive relationship. >> and the major differences on immigration and energy. mexican president andreas manuel lopez obrador met president biden at the white house this morning after declining presid

the new york times, another piece came out.ethal biological research facility at an army lab is shut down and security concerns with the disposal of hazardous materials have forced the government. suspend activities of the leading military biological center. it was the well-known in narrow circles laboratory at the ford dex army base, the ford dectric army complex, located in the state of merlint. this is not just the largest military base, but also the laboratories in which they work on biological defense of the united states, it was here after the second world war that documents were brought and brought scientists of nazi germany and japan, famous for their experiments in the field of chemistry and biology , by this american war criminal. created everything conditions for the continuation of experiments from the creation of biological and virological weapons. and after almost 80 years, the experiments continue with him. had to close down after a security issue, you're their lab, so this is a very good example of one of the be

the new york times describes that previous agreement this way. the agreement, according to an email reviewed by the new york times, allowed discussions of a meeting with jeffrey clark, a justice department official who tried to help mr. trump cling to power. mr. trump's interactions with john eastman, the conservative lawyer who drafted a legal strategy for overturning the election. any interactions with members of congress, and mr. cipollone's recollections of the events of january 6th. the agreement said that cipollone could not discuss conversations with mr. trump, other than one discussion in the oval office with mr. clark in a pivotal meeting on january 3rd, 2021. that would allow questions about what path cipollone said to cassidy hutchinson. >> i saw mr. cipollone right before i walked out that morning. mr. cipollone said something to the effect of, please make sure that we don't go to the capitol, cassidy, keep in touch with me. we are going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen. >> joining us now is da

. >>> so we in the media have gotten a lot of mileage out of this "new york times" sienna college pollresident biden at 33% approval with just a quarter of democrats thinking he should run for re-election. it's given the times and other media outlets the perfect opening to repeat the favored conventional wisdom that for sure, for sure, for sure democrats are going to get wiped out in the mid terms. republicans rein supreme. and still losing to joe biden in a re-elect match-up in the self-same poll. so how do the conventional wisdom folks know what will happen in november? well, this poll which surveyed 849 registered voters, says so, and so do other polls of 1,000 or sometimes 1200 americans. history. history tells us that the president's party always gets shellacked in the mid terms. except when it doesn't happen. it didn't happen to george w. bush because of a huge external event called 9/11 and the subsequent meritless invasion of iraq. voters tend to keep war time presidents in. forget that, forget that, forget that, democrats for sure are going to get wiped out. biden's rating is

what new reporting from "the new york times" is revealing about possible witness pressure, possible witness intimidation in the january 6th investigation from former president trump's team and allies. >>> and what's next for the epa after a supreme court ruling limits its ability to fight climate change. >>> and it's set to be a busy and costly holiday weekend for july 4th travelers. just how much will drivers have to pay at the pump? ♪ >>> good morning to viewers here in the united states and all around the world, it is friday, july 1st. i'm john berman with brianna keilar. someone within the trump orbit tried to influence the testimony of cassidy hutchinson. three sources tell cnn that is what hutchinson told the january 6th committee. she was one of the two witnesses who received threatening messages shown at this week's hearing. committee vice chair liz cheney suggested that was only a fraction of the evidence they have related to what she called possible witness intimidation. >>> and "the new york times" is reporting that trump's political organization and his allies paid for or promis

look at thislook new opinion pie from the new york times entitled joe biden is too old to bi be president again. new york magazine taking thingsi even a step further, pondering how biden can be pushed asidede even iff he tries to run for reelection in 2020 four. the article bluntly asked the question, are democrats stuck with biden? harris,thha 20 for anyway? strange to say, but they might be so the biden white housede is getting so desperate, so delusionallu that failing press secretary karine jean-pierre is now resorting to kind of like circle back jen psaki playbook and flat out making things up. here's jean-pierre falsely claiming biden's approval rating among democrats is ath a whopping 90%, which is a complete lie because over twohi thirds don'trd want him to run n some cases higher. >> take a look. what was the president's response to a new poll in the new york times today showingw 54% of democrats say they would prefer a different candidate dif. twenty four . and i>> would also say from that very same poll, there were 92% of democrats who support this president as well. look, you

and they said but we're the new york times and i said, oh, okay. well, if you're the new york times, i guess i'm qualified. i guess i'll do it. so my ego would not let me decline the new york times i thought oh, yeah. absolutely. yes. i'm an expert on this now. so i wrote it not bad for the new york times entitled. the boys are not all right, which really just expanded that question. why why why when it comes to not only matters of gun violence but violence in general do we just assume almost always correctly that it is male people. who are instigating that op-ed came out it went as the kids say viral a publisher contacted me and said would you like to write a book about this? and once again i said, i really don't think i'm qualified to do that. i had a meeting with these publishers and i said, you know, i'm just i'm just a jerk off who shows up on vh1 sometimes, you know, i i do commentary about cabbage patch kids. like i don't really think i'm the guy you want for this. i'm a college dropout worse. i dropped out of college to go be a teenage mutan