. >> the new yorker identified 12 women accusing moonves from a former executive to an assistant to aassage therapist. >> there is a where you have so many women recounting similar details and this is too much to be a coincidence. >> one of the women worked with moonves in the 1980s when they were both executives at lor mar television. he said do you want to have lunch and i said sure. it was taking him a long time and turned my head and he grabbed my head and pushed it all the way down into his penis. and pushed his penis into my mouth. i said just take me back. it was horrible. it was really horrible. >> the harassment didn't end there. a couple of years later, she alleges moonves exposed himself and claims he got angry because she did not sendai fellow executive a work memo. >> he turned bright red and he picked me up. i'm small. he picked me up and three me at the wall. i just sat on the floor and cried. >> the now 82-year-old did file a criminal complain late last year, but the statute of limitations expired. >> it was too late for phyllis. having said that, it's never too late t

so this was published by the new yorker. again, this is published by the new yorker just as the judiciary committee was announcing that it had reached a deal to accept testimony from christine blasey ford. the woman who says that brett kavanaugh did this to her at this party at yale when they were undergraduates, she apparently did not approach reporters about this matter. rather it was the new yorker that approached her after they had learned about this alleged incident from others. now that the allegation is public, though, ramirez says she wants the allegation assessed impartially. quote, for ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome. she was at first hesitant to speak publicly, but ramirez is now calling for the fbi to investigate kavanaugh's role in the incident. quote, i would think an fbi investigation would be warranted, she said. so once again we're back in the position of wondering why republicans in the senate and why the white house are insisting that the fbi must not be allowed to lock at this. as part of

bannon and me on the same program could never happen ouch or the new yorker first of all is now new all debated entertainment event featuring writers politicians and comedians the editor of the new yorker magazine explained his decision to call off steve balance appearance steve remick said he'd reconsidered saying quote there is a better way to engage with ban and he went on to say as well that he's open to interviewing brown in the future but in a more journalistic setting as he put it well interned all times former chief advisor hit back at the magazine accusing remick of being gutless when confronted by that howling online mob although of course we must mention burma is no stranger to causing controversy himself. if you look at you know the opposition party and how they portrayed the campaign how they portrayed the transition now that the pre-trained the administration it's always wrong their corporatist globalist media. brought old. given what steve bennett has represented and the massive critique around what bad and represents which is the rise of white nationalism in the unit

festival i am out i will not take part in an event that normalizes hate i hope the new yorker will do the right thing and cancel the steve benen the band maybe they should read their own reporting about his ideology i'm out sorry new yorker see if you're not bliss is free baron and me on the same program could never happen the new yorker first of all is an annual debate and entertainment event featuring writers politicians and comedians now the editor of the new yorker magazine explained his decision to call off steve bell and appearance david remnick said he'd reconsidered saying there's a better way to deal with than and he went on to say that interviewing bannan in the future but in a more journalistic setting up donald trump's former chief strategist hit back at the magazine accusing remnant of being gutless when confronted by an howling online mob although bennett himself is no stranger to causing controversy to. if you look at you know the opposition party and how they portrayed the campaign how they portrayed the transition now that the portraying the administration it's always

it's in "the new yorker" online. ks very much. >> always a pleasure. >>> coming up, we have breaking news. it could get us one step closer to knowing the fate of a key figure in the russia investigation. the question is will deputy attorney general rod rosenstein still have his job at the end of the week? i'm ken jacobus, i'm the owner of good start packaging. we distribute environmentally-friendly packaging for restaurants. and we've grown substantially. so i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. that's right, $36,000. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. my unlimited 2% cash back is more than just a perk, it's our healthcare. can i say it? what's in your wallet? exbut are you gettinglot enough of their nutrients?, new one a day with nature's medley is the only complete multivitamin with antioxidants from one total serving of fruits and veggies. new from one a day. little things can be a big

one person who is 100% sure is a anonymous source who is a second hand source.rc "the new yorker" hast confirmed with other eyewitnesses that judge kavanaugh was present at the party. they ran withs that story. that was not sufficient for the "new york times". >> and, obviously, andrea, we have all of this happening. backdrop to all of this is the explosive rod rosenstein story, north and south korea getting together,h talking. there's so much going on right now. donald trump's trade war kicking into full gear and the impact it will have. how do we sort through this? how do you sort through this? >> i'mro not sure exactly how because you've got the iranian president here in new york. you got, of course, gridlock every where. the president today meeting with the south korean mountaon, who bringing a message. report in the "new york times," similar to what we have also been hearing that top officials, including, up to the secretary of state concern that the t president is being too forward leaning, is too expansive, wants to proclaim victory with north korea in this speech saying a year

understand that. >> ronan farrow does not work for "the new york times." >> he told us why the new yorker decided to run that story when the "new york times" did not. he did point out he spoke to people at yale. >> not corroborated. >> who said they heard the stories. not corroborated to your satisfaction, again. let the people read the story. >> to the "new york times," not to me. >> i understand what you're saying, matt. i want people to read the story for themselves. appreciate you being with us. >>> when republicans finally have a chance to get it done and realize in order to do it they must also erase an extremely popular policy? we'll take a look at our reality check. ar skies and 75. -trash can, turn on the tv. -my pleasure. -ice dispenser, find me a dog sitter. -okay. -and make ice. -pizza delivered. -what's happened to my son? -i think that's just what people are like now. i mean, with progressive, you can quote your insurance on just about any device. even on social media. he'll be fine. -[ laughs ] -will he? -i don't know. -will he? alice loves the smell of gain so much, she wi

she wasn't entirely certain about her memory but after reviewing the incident she has told the new yorkerthat she is confident that it was cavanagh that exposed himself and that other people had talked about him doing so at this party cavanagh absolutely denies this and he issued a statement saying the alleged event from thirty five years ago did not happen he says the people who know me you knew me then know that this did not happen and have said so this is a smear plain and simple and the white house says it also continues to support cavanagh putting out a statement saying this thirty five year old uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the democrats designed to tear down a good man the statement goes on to say the white house stands firmly behind judge kavanagh well there has now been a third accusation and that one comes from michael evan oddie michael haven't already is the lawyer for stormy daniels who you may recall has said that she had a sexual relationship with president donald trump now have an audi sent out a tweet earlier before the new yorker a

it's in the "new yorker" online. farrow, thanks very much. >> always a pleasure. >>> coming up, we have breaking news. it could get us one step closer to knowing the fate of a key figure in the russia investigation. the question is will deputy attorney general rod rosenstein still have his job at the end of the week? ♪ take us downtown, waze. waze integration- seamlessly connecting the world inside with the world outside. making life a little easier. ♪ the new well-connected 2019 lincoln mkc. endless shrimp is back at with all the shrimp you want, any way you want them. there's new sesame-ginger grilled shrimp with savory soy-ginger sauce and sprinkled with asian seasoning. and favorites like garlic shrimp scampi! but endless shrimp won't last endlessly, so hurry in. when i walked through a snowthat's when i knewtte, i had to quit. for real this time. that's why i'm using nicorette. only nicorette gum has patented dual-coated technology for great taste. plus intense craving relief. every great why, needs a great how.

the new yorker magazine" in a piece just revealed last night.amirez is now calling on the fbi to investigate her accusations. this comes as s dr. christine blasey ford has agreed to testify before the senate judiciary committee on thursday, 10:00 a.m. eastern time, about her allegations that kavanaugh attempted to rape her when she was 15 and he 17 years old. more than 1100 alumnii of the holtlton-arms school, the e mard prep school that b blasey ford graduated from i in 1984, have signed a letter in support of her sexual assault comes against president trump's supreme court nominee judge brett kavanaugh. they say they are grateful that she came forward to tell her story. in the letter they write -- "it demands a thorough and independent investigation before the senate can reasonably vote on brett kavanaugh's nomination to a lifetime seat on the nation's highest court. dr. blasey ford's experience is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending holton. many of us are survivors ourselves." they deliver the letter last week t

but in any case, now the liberals say they'll be breaking up with "the new yorker."hen just yesterday came the biggest boycott news of all. nike launched their new campaign to celebrate 30 years of "just do it," including an ad with colin kaepernick that says, "believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything." yeah, which seems really uplifting with kaepernick's photo, but it's also the moto of many gambling addicts. don't forget. ( laughter ) now, millions of people- ( laughter ) millions of people love this ad-- i love how some of you are catching it later. ( laughter ) ( applause ) millions of people love this ad, like, it went viral all over the internet. but then the other shoe dropped. >> some outrage after nike colin kaepernick as the new face of its 30th anniversary "just do it" campaign. >> this is scummy. this is lousy. this is rotten. and i'm never buying another nike product again, and i think millions of americans are going to agree. >> several people posting videos on social media burning nike shoes, ripping logos off their clothing. >> tr

she tells t s "the new yorker."nts looking on at her request, "the new yorker" isn't naming them but "the new yorker" says they know who they are and a third male student exposed himself. she said i remember a penis being in front of my face. i knew that's not what i wanted even in that state of mind. she recalled remarking that's not real and the other students laughing at her confusion and taunting her and one encouraging her to kiss it. she said she pushed the person away and in the process touched him. ramirez who was raised catholic said she was shaken and she said i wouldn't touch one until i was married. i was embarrassed, ashamed and humiliated. she said brett was laughing and i can see his face and his hips going forward and somebody yelled down the hall, brett kavanaugh just put his penis in front of someone's pace. sam stein, this is a different type of allegation than the one that dr. ford is making and yet, still something that constitutes sexual misconduct. >> yeah, there is a lot to process here. a fe

well, he was talking about the piece in "the new yorker," which he considered uncorroborated. he also quoted "the new york times," which i also thought was new york -- >> the failing "new york times." >> right, right. >> saying "the new york times" had the same information but, you know, didn't go with it. so, you know, i mean, we understand what is going on here. we understood it back when anita hill testified. and, you know, little has changed, to be honest. little has changed. >> republicans seem to -- kaitlan, this is for you. republicans seem to be lumping in this new allegation coming out of this "new yorker" piece with christine blasey ford's accusations as an offensive political tactic. lumping it all together. >> yeah. we are seeing the strategy change very quickly in the matter of that allegation with christine blasey ford to this allegation with the latest wok in "the new yorker," deborah ramirez, quite a bit a bit of a big strategy change here, brooke. the white house before were not saying this was a smear neither was mitch mcconnell. they were saying she doesn't r

. >> there's also -- in these new accounts, also coming from ronan's latest article for "the new yorker," which came out today. but you talk about these two stories playing out at once. there's the battle for cbs that was already happening. they're inextricably linked at this point. >> there's an incredible confluence of events. if you talk to moonves' side, they're saying this is just about the boardroom battle. you talk to the other side, they're saying he was taken down by these allegations against him. finally this is a moment of accountability. you talk about what farrow has, he had six women back in july. he has six more women in today's story. a dozen allegations of harassment and assault. some of them quite disturbing. they're up on newyorker.com. >> there's also a lot of outrage about what we were hearing initially, what he could walk away with in terms of money. what do we know about that? >> part of what moonves is saying in his defense, he's saying the new stories in "the new yorker," the most appalling accusations are untrue. he said he did have consensual relations with th

the request from dianne feinstein came after "the new yorker" magazine claiming a woman who attended yale with kavanaugh says she remembers him exposing himself to her at a party. corroboration is thin. >> the chairman grassley says there is no issue with the hearing going forward on thursday. president trump's aides discussed the latest allegation against kavanaugh with the president on sunday, but dropping the nomination is not currently under consideration. we have jessica schneider with more from washington. >> reporter: the white house is denying another allegation against kavanaugh of inappropriate behavior. this time from a woman who attended yale with the supreme court nominee. "the new yorker" reported on sunday that 53-year-old debra ramirez remembers kavanaugh exposing himself to her at a dorm party in the 1983-1984 school year. two other people, ramirez says, were present at the party and issued a statement saying they never heard of the incident and cnn has not corroborated her story. kavanaugh said this alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. the people who knew

one of the authors behind "the new yorker" magazine piece on those claims will break down her reportingiary committee richard blumenthal will weigh in on the new allegations and what they mean for kavanaugh's confirmation "morning joe" moments away it was here. i couldn't catch my breath. it was the last song of the night. it felt like my heart was skipping beats. they said i had afib. what's afib? i knew that meant i was at a greater risk of stroke. i needed answers. my doctor and i chose xarelto® to help keep me protected from a stroke. once-daily xarelto®, a latest-generation blood thinner significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your body's natural blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. for afib patients well managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase your risk of stroke. while taking, you may bruise more

leaves the country. >> six more women tell the new yorker it ranges from oral sex to forcible touching. he said it is appalling and untrue and alleging it is part of a concerted effort by others to destroy my name and reputation and my career. in recent weeks, lawyers had been examining the corporate culture investigating allegations in a previous new yorker story. moonves has been with cbs since 1995 and one of the highest paid xecutives making tens of millions of dollars a year. an exit package could be worth as much as $100 million. a lot of people point to the golden parachutes and said is this justice? they walk out s the door wi much money and a lot of the women quoted in the new yorker piece made that point. >>t takes the allegations seriously adding the board of directors is conducting investigations that are ongoing. nbc news, new york. >> the east coast is preparing for the worst as florence gapes strength and barrels towards the u.s. forecasters warn the storm has been twisting and turning over the atlantic and could deliver a hit wn it makes landfall later this week. floren

she relaid some of these memories from this moment, but the new yorker says that she was uncertain at first about kavanaugh's role in this, but they did speak with another classmate who went to school with them at the time who corroborated some of the key details that ramirez brought up to the new yorker, independent of her. so there are some questions this morning being raised by the white house and by kavanaugh's allies about whether these allegations are corroborated, but here's what ronan farrow had to say about that issue. >> there is a strong evidentiary basis. her claim is corroborated to an extent that is not always possible by people who did not know her, have not interacted with her, but recounted the same fact pattern. i would point you to the piece. the other is the same rison she decided to speak, john, which is this is a story that is out there on the hill. it is being investigated. it is a matter of news, whether she tells her own version of this story or not. >> so it's clear that the issue of whether these allegations are corroborated is going to be a key point that's

one of the attorneys for the second accuser, debra ramirez, whose identity was revealed in "the new yorkerning us right now is cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin, cnn legal commentator ken cuccinelli, and cnn political commentator and white house "new york times" correspondent maggie haberman. the fact they're taking the white house committee to a vote on friday it shows their intention to move as quickly as possible. >> they've been quite blunt about that. you take the aggregate of senate majority leader mitch mcconnell's comments on the floor, you heard what the president said today, which was wildly off script and not what he had been advised to do and i think he had a variety of reasons for doing that, and the fact that he needed -- they needed to set this hearing i think three days ahead of time. so they had to do it today if they wanted to do it friday. they can always postpone it. but yes, it says -- you heard lindsey graham say this on sunday, you heard other senators say, this that basically they've made up their minds about the vote. >> why do you think the president wanted t

i cannot believe that "the new yorker" went with us. wendy, i want to play for you something that chris coons and blumenthal said about the burden of proof, another new standard for the democrats. let's watch. >> there is a burden on the part of the white house to do the investigation. what are they hiding? speak it with judge kavanaugh who is seeking a lifetime appointment to the supreme court and who i think bears the burden of disproving his allegations. >> you can't prove a negative. as the oldest thing in the world. you cannot possibly prove a negative. >> laura: do you think they really care about what happened to these women or is it about -- >> of course not. it's about them, their political races, it's about keeping the supreme court in the hands of activists and not letting president trump have this great nominee. it's not about the women. the women are being used. >> laura: he's a bush nominee, let's not forget. he was put on the court of appeals is a bush nominee. panel, thank you so much. we got a good exclusive reaction fro

the new yorker story stands as it is.e will see what else comes out from that, who is able to add additional information on that. jenn mayer,farrow, the authors of that story. dorothy is in silver spring, maryland, on the line for those that oppose the nomination. caller: on this nomination for mr. cavanaugh, this is a doubt for him. i know for a fact the fbi investigated back in the day 32 years ago, my daughter who had already had clearance from the department of navy. almost toa four year --m my daughter host: are you talking about a background check or specific sexual assault allegation? the background check goes from when she is an elementary school all the way to high school. they did not do a background elementaryr as school. they only did a background check on what he did in the present. they need to investigate this. about how do we know intense the background check was. didt: christine blasey ford not share her allegations publicly. she held these close for some 30 .ears so it is perhaps understandable that this

the accusations were reported sunday in the new yorker. a source tells cbs news he's been offered a separation package of $80 million in stock to be held in escrow pending the results of an independent investigation. >>> cbs chairman leslie moonves is tonight preparing to resign bowing to pressure by a sexual harassment scandal. the number of women accusing him of sexual misconduct has doubled to 12, according to a new report by the new yorker magazine. detailing six previously unreported incidents, which allegedly took place between the 1980s and early 2000s. according to the magazine, they include claims that had forced them to perform orl sex on him, exposed himself and used physical violence and intimidation against him. he's denied all allegations of sexual misconduct, though he acknowledges what he described as consensual relationships with three of the accusers. the magazine says he declined to say which three. in one incident when he worked in 1986, he invited a fellow executive to lunch, drove instead to a et secluded area and forc

and moonves's resignation comes shortly after "the new yorker" magazine published a new article detailing stories of more women who are accusing him of inappropriate sexual behavior. in a statement he acknowledged three of those encounters but said they were consensual. cbs chairman and ceo leslie moonves resigned yesterday just hours after six new women came forward accusing him of sexual misconduct. a report by the new yorker magazine details incidents which allegedly took place between the 1980s and early 2000s. they include claims that moonves forced them to perform oral sex on him, that he exposed himself to them without their consent, and that he used physical violence and intimidation against them. moonves released a sttement late last night saying untrue allegations from decades ago are now being made against me that are not consistent with who i am. i am deeply saddened to be leaving the company. cbs corporation and major shareholder national amusement said moonves and cbs will donate $20 million to one or more organizations to support the me too movement and equality for women i

. >> kavanaugh and the white house deny the claim made by a second woman, and she told the new yorker about a allegation that happened in college. all of this as the president is in new york this week. he will speak at the united nations this morning. cnn's abby fiphillip is live at the u.n. >> reporter: cnn learned president trump spent yesterday talking to his team about the latest allegations against kavanaugh, but the president is not considering withdrawing his nomination, but many said they were sure kavanaugh would be confirmed, the latest allegations cast that into doubt. feinstein calling for a delay in the proceedings and an fbi allegation. "the new yorker" reports that a classmate from yale, she remembers kavanaugh exposing himself to her at a party. kavanaugh denying the claim, writing in part this alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. this is a smear, plain and simple. the white house throwing their support behind president trump's nominee, saying the allegations are deny -- designed to tear down a good man. she is confident in her recollection. a classmate who

the "new yorker" has published a piece claiming new sexual misconduct allegations against him during college days at yale. the woman at the center of the story, deborah ramirez, is 53, and went to school with kavanaugh, her claims date back to the 1983-84 academic year when kavanaugh was a freshman at yale. a at least four senate democrats have received information about the allegations and at least two have started to investigate in a statement kavanaugh wrote to the "new yorker," quote, this alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. the people who knew me then know that this do not happen and have said so, this is a smear, plain and simple. i look forward to testifying thursday about the truth and defending my good name. the white house issued a statement in response to the allegations in the "new yorker." they say quote this 35-year-old uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the democrats designed to tear down a good man. with me to discuss this, princeton university professor and msnbc contributor, eddie glaude junior and msnbc contributor bet

negotiations come to a close last night, there were new allegations being raised in an aboute in the new yorker breck kavanaugh from his years at yale university. so now we start monday morning .ith a whole new landscape is this thursday hearing still on and will the senators want to ?ush forward with it senator dianne feinstein said last night it is time to halt the proceedings and take a look at all of this. the white house this morning does not appear to be slowing anything down. in fact, brett kavanaugh issued a statement last night denying the new allegations, saying this smear, plain and simple, a smear of his reputation, he is extremely eager to come forward thursday and clear his name. he says he wants to come forward as soon as possible and clear his name. host: if this happens thursday, how this will go down in the senate judiciary committee, with everything from who will be doing the questioning. guest: the judiciary committee agreed to meet in the smaller meeting room it has. the big one was used for the brick kavanaugh hearing at the start of this month in september, those four day

but the "new york times" after the new yorker is reporting came ry. its own sto and the "new york times" wrote, quote, the times had interviewed r veral dozen people ohe past week in an attempt torr orate ms. ramirez's story and could find no one with first hand knowlage. this iew acquisition but there are no eye witnesseses. the new york time said it did not report because it did notha feel i enough information. >> woodruff: i'm going to be talking in a few minutes with ronan farrow who is one of the authors o of the new yorker's story. the white house has been dealing over a week with accusations noom one woman and now come accusations fromer woman. who are they defending. what are they saying. >> brett kavanaugh is defending himself which is why the white house is sticking by him. brett kavanaugh says he did not do this nor is there anything in his past that would suggest he would do something like. he revealed somtohing personal y when he sat down with fox news to do an interview with him. let me tell you a little bit what he talked about with fox

let's talk with susan glasser, staff writer for "the new yorker" and global affairs analyst for cnn. r former editor is with me, political analyst jeff greenfield. susan, you wrote about this feeling of two americas this week. you're in new orleans, you've been traveling all weekend. does it feel like two americas to you today? >> absolutely, brian. what i'm so struck by is the one thing that happened that was unifying was that most of america was watching these hearings, taking in the news, everywhere i've gone. i've been in texas as you have in recent days, in new york, in washington. people are talking about this on the airplane, in the airport, in restaurants. it's a national conversation. unfortunately, however, there's not a shared narrative about the facts. to me that's one of the biggest differences between now and 27 years ago when the anita hill/clarence thomas hearings happened, we've almost given up, we've received tceded the idea should be one basis for the conversation. if the effort was to get at the truth, the hearing the other day was not about truth. that wasn't the

know, 350 only r 60 blocks away thinking is this an attack on our city. >> reporter: they were new yorkersling in the aftermath giants and jets standpoint, these were our fans, literally our parking lot is a commuter lot to go into new york city. some cars never left our parking lot. >> if we had to go play football, it wouldn't have made any sense to me with so much else going on just across the river. >> reporter: with the country in mourning, the sports world paused to grieve. an unprecedented stoppage in pro sports as stadiums and ballparks sat empty. >>> at that point, where was sport for you? >> i think for me personally, and i think for most of the people i was around, it was the furthest thing from our mind. i think it was irrelevant at that point. >> reporter: so how do you then know that you need to get back to playing? >> you don't. you don't. and even when we did, we still didn't know until we actually played and got through it. >> we realized not that they need us, they need an escape from this horrible tragedy. and when he started to realize, we get back to what we do because

the "new yorker" has published a piece claiming new sexual misconduct allegations against him duringis college days at yale. the woman at the center of the story, deborah ramirez, is 53, and went to school with kavanaugh, her claims date back to the 1983-84 academic year when kavanaugh was a freshman at yale. a at least four senate democrats have received information about the allegations and at least two have started to investigate in a statement kavanaugh wrote to the "new yorker," quote, this alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. the people who knew me then know that this do not happen and have said so, this is a smear, plain and simple. i look forward to testifying thursday about the truth and defending my good name. the white house issued a statement in response to the allegations in the "new yorker." they say quote this 35-year-old uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the democrats designed to tear down a good man. with me to discuss this, princeton university professor and msnbc contributor, eddie glaude junior and msnbc contributor b

as more time passes, more facts come out, like yesterday's new yorker story. and that hasn't helped. kavanaugh's cause. >> ronan farrow and jane mayor, the authors of this, they know that there were democratic staffers who knew about this story last week and were also republicans. you could see why democrats did want to delay. they wanted to wait until things come out and you could see why republicans want to speed it up. it provides some context there. brett kavanaugh will present a calendar which will not show any entries that he attended a party. and jeff will say who of us keep calendars from when we were 17? >> and when you were 17, it that appear in your calendar? come on. this allegation may or may not be true. but the idea that some 17-year-old's calendar proves one thing or another seems absurd to me. we do live in the real world here. >> nonetheless he will come forward with that calendar. >> okay. >> and also leland keyser, one of the women who apparently professor ford said was at the party now is saying she never met brett kavanaugh or at a party

the "new yorker" could find no one with firsthand knowledge of the alleged sexual misconduct.president continues to defend his nominee. >> judge kavanaugh is an outstanding person. and i am with him all the way. for people to come out of the woodwork from 36 years ago and 30 years ago and never mentioned it, all of a sudden it happens, in my opinion, it's totally political. it was totally political. >> reporter: on capitol hill, protests erupted outside senators' offices, including republican susan collins, a key undecided vote, whose aide tried to apiepease demonstrators. the plan is still to move forward with thursday's testimony from judge kavanaugh and christine blasey ford, the first woman who accused him of sexual assault. chairman chuck grassley spokesman says the committee will also look into this new allegation of sexual misconduct by ramirez, but democrats are demanding an immediate postponement of the confirmation proceedings and renewing their call for the fbi to investigate. and this afternoon, majority leader mitch mcconnell, blamed democrats for all of these all

farrow took the story to "the new yorker" magazine where his reporting won a pulitzer prize.ducer at the time say nbc impeded their reporting. >>> arizona central reports the body of a missing boater was found in the colorado river, but three other people are still missing. more than a dozen people were thrown from two boats when they collided saturday night. the body of the missing woman was found yesterday in a section of the river along the california/arizona border. nine people were injured in that accident. the cause of the crash is being investigated. >>> "the new york times" reports "the new yorker" magazine canceled plans to interview steve bannon during its festival next month after several high-profile celebrities dropped out. in an e-mail to his staff last night, "new yorker" editor announced that bannon would no longer appear as a headliner. earlier, several celebrities, including jim carey and patton oswald said they were pulling out because bannon was set to appear. >>> "time" magazine says storm former vice president joe biden was spotted running in the streets

the new yorker reported on sunday that 53-year-old deb ora ramirez remembers kavanagh exposing himself to her during a 1983-84 school year. the president of the party issued a statement to the new yorker saying, they never heard of such an incident. and cnn has now corroborated her story. kavanagh has released a statement saying this. this alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. the people who knew me then know that this did not happen and have said so. this is a smear, plain and simple. i look forward to testifying on thursday about the truth and defending my good name and the reputation for character and integrity i have spent a lifetime building against these last-minute allegations. white house spokeswoman kerry kupek said this 35-year-old uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the democrats designed to tear down a good man. this claim denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew judge kavanagh at the time in college say. the white house stands firmly behind judge kavanagh. ramirez

you, sir, wrote a whole piece in "the new yorker" which i made sure to read the minute it went to press suggesting the exact opposite saying that the investigation is very much in doubt should roach stein go. >> well, you know, it's in danger in two ways. one is it is quite clear that the president has wanted to fire mueller several times during his year and a half in office and it has been principally rosenstein who has stopped that. rosenstein has been emphatic throughout that he has seen no basis on which to fire him and he's not going to fire him and they will have to fire rosenstein to put someone in who will fire him. but the less obvious peril and i think alisyn mentioned it in the conversation with clapper, is that rosenstein doesn't just have the power to hire and fire mueller, he has the power to supervise the investigation and limit the areas or expand the areas in which mueller is allowed to investigate. this has come up -- the paperwork for this has come up in redacted forms during the manafort trial. so the new supervisor could restrict mueller in ways that would paralyze

she told the new yorker that she wasn't "foggy and slurring her words." she even acknowledges she had significant memory gap from that evening. "the new york times" spent over a week trying to corroborate her story, talking to dozens of people, and of the time said this, "they have interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story. they could find no one with firsthand knowledge. ms. ramirez herself contacted former yale classmates asking if they recall the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain that mr. kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself. and those who remarry is listed as witnesses in yet another case here, welcome to the indecent charges? they are all flatly denying. we can say with confidence that if the incident debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it. but we have not. the behavior she describes would be completely out of character for brett. in addition, some of us knew debbie long after yale and she never describes this incident until his supreme court n

"the new yorker" acknowledges it could locate no witnesses who could put kavanaugh at the party. and that ramirez at first was not sure it was kavanaugh who exposed himself. but the magazine notes, "after six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers it was kavanaugh." reporter jane mayer insists there is corroboration for ramirez's story. >> we found somebody who remembers hearing about it that night or the next day. unlike the people at the party, he was very sober, and remains a very distinguished person. he's on background. and i asked him myself, "are you sure this was brett kavanaugh that you heard about?" he said, "i am 100% sure." >> reporter: it all comes as judge kavanaugh and dr. christine blasey ford prepare to testify on capitol hill. dr. ford says kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school. >> i am not questioning and have not questioned that perhaps dr. ford at some point in her life was sexually assaulted by someone in some place. but wh

leahy: i have not seen "the new yorker" story. my concern on the process is that it has been rammed through. this is the same republican leadership that for years, stalled any action on a supreme court nominee. it stopped merrick garland who would have been confirmed overwhelmingly with both republican and democratic votes. they wanted to see how the elections came out and allow president trump to nominate whomever he wanted. now they are rushing to get done before the midterm elections. as a result, there are thousands upon thousands of pages of material we have never received about judge kavanaugh. a lot of background things we have not received. the issue you have raised, i cannot talk about "the new yorker" artical, i have not seen it. any issues that have come up have been turned over to the people who do the background investigations. we will see what they come up with. greta: we should note in "the new yorker" that judge kavanaugh released a statement saying, "i categorically and unequivocally deny the allegation. i did not

it was hours after our show last sunday this "new yorker" fees came out.ix women, two of them said he forced them to perform oral sex. one said he threw the woman against the wall and there was talk of retaliation and ruined careers. you broke the news last weekend, cbs made a point of saying moonves is out and the $120 million in severrans payments will be withheld. do you think he'll ever see any of that money. charlie: the $120 new is contingent on the investigation. so i don't have any sources on the committee that's investigating it. i do have sources inside cbs. and people inside cbs doubt he's going to get the full amount. a lot of them doubt he'll get any of it. the reason why, if you read some of the coverage that came out of it, there was some point where apparently this led the board about getting someone a job who was making misstatements about his sexual misconduct. when you mislead the board like that -- howie: that's the problem. there was a statement that said the cbs board initially brushed off statement by the women. an 83-year-old produc

there are new allegations from ramirez where the new yorker to maria's point says new yorker printed confirmed with any other eyewitnesses that kavanaugh was present. the new york times took it further, as you said. they interviewed several dozen people, trying to corroborate this woman's story and no one -- they found no one with firsthand knowledge and indeed found people that ms. ramirez contacted, former yale classmates, asking if they recalled the incident. maria: they said they weren't there. >.dagen:there.dagen: she told m she couldn't be certain that kavanaugh was the one that exposed himself to her. with this story, does that damage the democrats even more because it does increasingly look like they're using these stories for pure political gain. maria: and add to that the hate, this op ed in the jury l nail, why the left is consumed with hate. this constant fighting and taking -- trying to take down republicans. >> why the left is consumed with doing anything necessary to maintain roe versus wade as it presently stands. this is all about abortion. maria: i think it's about

. >> in the new yorker, a woman says kavanaugh exposed himself to her when they were students at yale. >> the big week for president trump on the international stage as he attends the united nations general assembly in new york. >> i've always said the united nationses that tremendous potential. >> big cosby faces sentencing. >> from probation to 30 years in prison. >> i pray it's 30 years. he deserves every year. >> across the carolinas, flood threats linger. >> thousands more may evacuate due to the flooding. >> firefighters in california scrambling to contain the chartly fire. the fast mosting brushfire that started saturday. >> all that -- >> jumps over the defenders to pick up the first. >> the bills pull off the biggest nfl upset in 23 years. >> and all that matters -- >> when he tells you something, do you trust him? >> of course i trust what the american president tells me. >> do you trust him? >> yes. >> on "cbs this morning." >> we thought we would never see it. >> the first victory on the tour in five-plus years to get his 80th career victory. >> i can't believe i pulled th

she told the new yorker kavanaugh exposed himself during a drunken party in the '80s.ying this is a smear, plain and simple. its first accuser, you briefly saw there, dr. christine ford, will testify in front of congress on thursday. happening now, hillary clinton getting ready to headline two fund-raisers in san francisco. the first private event is a san francisco home and in support of the person running for lieutenant governor. the second fund-raiser is for the democratic party. sticker shock. 897 square foot home in pail low alto, about a third of size of a tennis court is going for $2.59 million. according to the chronicle, it's got two bedroom, one bathroom and a lot of headlines. we're going to have a local news update in half an hour. heat up? we )re tracking skyrocketing temperatures and overnight changes to your forecast. plus, a bay area homeowner wasn )t happy with the color of her home. how our consumer unit "patched" things up. tomorrow morning from 4:30 to 7. distance relationship. this is long distance with the best wifi experience, plus the most free

it is the "new yorker" allegation seemed to spark this. >> and i understand the reaction to the "new rker" allegation and the weakness of the corroboration, but i also think it is necessaryitated that you have a two front war. you can't just start to talk about these other series of women needing to be heard. you need to start attacking the dnl democrats. which also means attacking the women themselves. not a good idea. >> i think the attitude on the right was that the democratic strategy since day one of these hearings has been to delay the nomination past the election in the hopes that the senate is captured by the democrats and then they can hold that seat open they'recentliptreceipt -- theoretically for two years. i think when ford came out, grassley said we need to take this allegation seriously. he had the unusual tweets remember right before they finally reached the commitment, the commitment for her to appear on thursday. and within 24 hours of florida commitment, the second accuser comes forward in a "new yorker" article that the "new york times" says it did not go with becau