back to that again changing our norms and how do you change norms, how do we change norm of social justice, norms about racism and norms about marriage, well, how do you do that? you change attitudes, not just beliefs but how they regard their beliefs and those beliefs of other people and i think that one of the things that does is give us hope that we can do that, it's not -- i'm old enough to think, you know, i remember a time where, you know, you could be despaired, that's not going change, my people are not going to change about that. that's too much to hope but a lot of people. >> so should i feel hopeful? >> you should, you should. >> deep fakes coming, climate change institute more certainty. >> yeah, you're right, we should be really depressed. [laughter] >> what was i saying. [laughter] >> no, we should be -- we should be hopeful and i think that we should think of the fact that rational change takes time, it takes an effort on all of us and i think we can be helpful by looking particularly in climate change right now, we are all, i hope, well not all of us apparently, some people

changing our norms and how do you change norms?how do you change norms of social justice, norms about racism, norms about marriage, how do you do that? in part you try to change people's attitudes. not just their beliefs but how they regard their beliefs and those beliefs of other people. i think one of the things that that example does is give us hope that we can do that. i'm old enough to think i remember a time you could be disparity you can be, that's not gonna change. people are gonna change about that but people have changed. not everybody. that's too much. >> but a lot of people. >> should i feel hopeful? >>. >> we got deep fakes, come climate change that will institute more uncertainty. >> we should be really depressed. [laughter] what was i saying? [laughter] we should be hopeful. we should think of the fact that rational change takes time it takes an effort on all of us and i think we can also be hopeful by looking particularly at climate change right now we are all, i hope, some people are not inspired by greta's leaders

so, for all of the public hyperventilating over the institutional norms that we have heard from house democrats in the recent years, it appears there is no intention of letting the norms of basic due process standard in the way as they seek to cancel out the presidency. in the meantime in the senate we will keep our focus on the work that we need to come complete for the american people and in the coming days, we will confirm another slate of nominees for starters later this afternoon we will advance the nomination of the president's choice to be secretary of the air t force. and speaking of our armed forces, congress can waste no more time in getting the appropriations process back on track delivering the funding that servicemembers need. the president and speaker of the house produced an agreement in the process and the white house and the congressional leadership funding targets for defense ande nondefense. last month or democratic colleagues went back onti the dl and urgent resources for the operations of the pentagon were withheld we need to put the political games aside when he

norm, let me begin with you. we just saw h.r.cmaster do it, wow, it looked easy when he did it. >> and it is easy. this is black-letter law and norms and built and baked into our political system. to watch cory gardner and before him joni ernst try not to even answer the simplest question here, really shows the dilemma they feel and felt for the last two-plus years. they've enabled donald trump. they have bowed to the way in which he has intimidated them with pressure including from that base that is in their states. and they've sat through what we now see as a level of corruption that is unparalleled in our history. it's like you go into a house and there's a body and suddenly in every room and under every table there's another one and it's cascading and it's going to get worse and we're going to see people turning. sondland now going to give a deposition despite what the secretary of state said, the ambassador to the eu. more rats will leave the sinking ship and it's going to change the dynamic here. maybe moral cowards will ge

but those norms of behavior very firmly embedded within our in a very strongly political context and it's very clear in in china if you want to operate in china as a business as an organization if you want to succeed if you want to build a fun base if you want to secure financial return make a profit then there are the rules of the game and you have to comply with those rules and if you don't what you will do what you'll find is you slip into the situation that the n.b.a. now finds itself in and so i do agree with the courts i think it's very very difficult to find a middle way there is only one way in china and you either accept it or you don't but coming back to the n.b.a. sports has always been thrust into geo political tensions i mean for you about formula one in bahrain. and the joshua about to fight in saudi arabia why are our sports men and women managers expected to keep storm one we hear from diplomats who many business leaders who manage to get away with with with with you know seeing things that aren't palatable to the countries in which the boonies. well the 1st thing i t

. >> like many of the things in our government it was just a norm.we have found i think in the course of the trump administration is that many of the norms have held, but some of them have not. what we found is that the president of the united states is willing to trample over them at any given point. i am a little confused by this story. walter, i ask you what do you think's actually going on in this story because i have read it three or four times and i still can't quite get what is being alleged. there is a whistle-blower which is interesting in and of itself. the notion that the whistle-blowers are coming forth in washington is kind of an interesting thing. but what is actually being alleged as having been the wrongdoing here? >> so we don't actually know. the law strictly protects access to tax returns and imposes severe penalties. so that's going to make it a little harder for congress to be able to release this one than they did the ukraine whistle-blower's complaint. but they're apparently researching that and analyzing whether they can do it

but those norms of behavior very firmly embedded within our in a very strongly political context and it's very clear in in china if you want to operate in china as a business as an organization if you want to succeed if you want to build a fun base if you want to secure financial return make a profit then there are the rules of the game and you have to comply with those rules and if you don't what you will do what you'll find is you slip into the situation that the n.b.a. now finds itself in and so i do agree with the courts i think it's very very difficult to find a middle way there is only one way in china and you either accept it or you don't but coming back to the n.b.a. sports has always been thrust into geo political tensions in formula one in bahrain. and the joshua about to fight in saudi arabia why are our sports men and women managers expected to keep storm one we hear from diplomats who and many business leaders who manage to get away with with with with you know seeing things that aren't palatable to the countries in which the boonies. well the 1st thing i think i would s

of the trump administration is that many norms have helped.have not. what we found is that the president of the united states is willing to trample over them at any given point. i'm a little confused by this story. what do you think is actually going on in this story? as i read it now three or four times and i can't get what is being alleged other than there is a whistleblower which is interesting as a dynamic, the notion that the whistleblowers are coming forth in washington is an interesting thing. what is being alleged as the wrong doing here? >> we don't actually know. the law strictly protects access to tax returns and imposes severe penalty. that will make it a little harder for congress to be able to release this one than they did the ukraine whistleblower's complaint. but they are apparently researching that and analyzing whether they can do it. so the only thing we do know is that the complaint involves a potential effort by some political appointee at the treasury department level with regard to the tax return of either the president

international terrorism, iran, russia, refugees and international norms. the current conflict began as peaceful protests against an autocratic dictator, one of the many uprisings in 2011. though many hoped the protests might open up the door to positive change, those hopes were quickly dashed as the result into a crucible of intersecting conflicts that had reverberated well beyond the middle east. the regime survived in power for decades by operating at the intersection of criminality and terrorism. the united states designated syria as a state-sponsored and service him in 1979. we know the nature of this regime. they facilitated the movement of the operatives during the iraq war to attack the forces and he will seek to leverage al qaeda and fighters again when it suits his syria today provides a safe haven to the world's most dangerous terrorist groups. greateste to the concentration of foreign fighters in afghanistan in the 1980's. ice is no longer holds territory, but was already reconstituting as an insurgent force and will replenish its ranks of fight

the aim of such a concept is obvious, to revise the norms of international law that no longer suit the west and to substitute it with rules adapted to its self-serving schemes that are them rated depending on political expediency. anproclaim the west as indisputable source of legitimacy. the it is advantageous, right of peoples to self-determination is important. when it is not, it is declared illegitimate. to justify the revisionist rules, the west resorts to manipulation of public opinion, double standards on human rights, suppression of undesirable media, and bans on journalist trying to do their job. has teachers pets among their charges in the post-soviet territory. closed formats outside of legitimate auto o frameworks are created. -- legitimate multilateral frameworks are created. the select few are declared multilateral frameworks. this is accompanied with -- i do use them in order to advance nonconsensual ideas in circumvention of universal mechanisms. attacks on international law have reached alarming levels. jcpoas. withdraw from the endorsed by the united nations 2231ity co

and i think 2:01 will be the norm and two hours will become the norm and two hours will become the normfor them sometime in the future. —— what eliud is done. andrew jones of exeter university, thank you very much. a worker at manchester's arndale shopping centre and a member of the public have been praised for helping to stop a suspect who stabbed three people at the centre yesterday. counterterror police continue to lead the investigation into the attack. a 40—year—old man has been detained under the mental health act. mark edwardson reports. we think first this morning of those recovering from their injuries. at the arndale centre today, a very public show of support and reassurance for the people of greater manchester from its mayor, his deputy and manchester city council's leader. greater manchester always does what it does best, which is to come together, bring things under control, reassure the public. that's what we're doing this morning. an enhanced police presence too, officers — some armed with submachineguns — on patrol as shoppers went about their business. we had planned t

a greater risk of terrorism that russia is stronger and iran is stronger when you talk about those norms which that nass one - - mass homicide withol chemical weapons bombing hospitals and schools isn't one of the international norms for decades then american leadership? and in all five of these areas we are weak or not to mention we have left our partners the kurds to be slaughtered then isn't that fundamental more of american leadership and influenc challenge? what leverage do we have after we take action likeer this. >> thank youth congressman knight do you think we have leverage we are a capable actor on the world stage. obviously we have a coalition we put together to conduct airstrikes against isis and sanctions and withholding of the economic construction funding or diplomaticec recognition that the assad regime itself but i do think you make an important point congressman about the role of american leadership t because without the united states to assemble the t international coalition to put together the contributions from others, theyey will do it themselves and say the writing

the aim of such a concept is obvious, to revise the norms of international law, which no longer suit the west, and to substitute it with rules adapted to its self-serving schemes, which are elaborated depending on political expediency. and to proclaim the west and only the west as an indisputable source of legitimacy. for instance, when it is advantageous, the right of people to self-determination is important. when it's not, it is declared illegitimate. in order to justify the revisionist rules, the west resorts to manipulation of public opinion, dissemination of information, double standards of human rights, suppression of undesirable media, and bans on journalists doing their job. moreover, the west has no got teachers pet, so to speak, among charges in the post-soviet territory. instead of collective work based on equal rights, closed formats outside of legitimate multilateral frameworks are created and approaches agreed upon behind closed doors by a and are then declared multilateral agreements. this is an attempt to privatize international organization and use them in order to

norm norms the fight of these are things for frankly a prankster or do you can stream rule order or free. response beats and run our ride for snarky periphery best restaurants rights of it's of what evolved well over 200 years and people now seem to be rethinking them well over 200 years and people now seem to be rethinking them now some would say that it's a wild world of political correctness others would say they have a point now some would say that it's a wild world of political correctness others would say they have a point and that hate speech that should hate speech be elites lead chill should be illegal is the quote but john here's the one who has to be agents to the did who gets to decide what i considered word hate what speech is catch him so that's it's a tricky question 849 percent of america that gets a tricky question 49 percent of americans say that they want facebook to make that decision but mark some say the word they want isn't the f.a. outis book to make that decision but mark zuckerberg is adamant he does not want that job more people across the spectrum believe that

of today as they put it but it seems to be written these days to reflect the cultural norms of today as they put it but it seems most people don't actually understand what the law really protects. 80 percent says most people don't actually understand what the law really protects 80 percent saying they think it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequences or the poll also think it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequences or the poll also found that almost half of americans think that hate speech should be made illegal to confirm that almost half of americans think that hate speech should be made illegal to caleb maupin reports the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and reports. the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically in the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet the new most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet th

if you break those norms, i can say, see, you're a hypocrite. trump plays on the process that we're committed to norms and processes. he takes advantage of folks who are institutionalists. institutionalists or conservative impulses feed into what they want to do. you look up and evening has been changed, undermined. on the one hand we have to understand strategically how that works. on the other hand, we have to be deliberate. we can't allow the process to be viewed as a political hit job. it can't be seen as part san ship. it has to be somber, in some ways -- it has to follow the facts, be dispassionate. >> their main concern -- clear and convincing. >> to slow it down, though, to take it into the winter holidays, the christmas holidays, to take it into january actually in some ways raises a red flag. >> that's right. early february you have the iowa caucuses. so much to talk about, eddie glaude and rick tyler, so glad you were here. question, is there anybody else, the question by long time democratic insiders about the current field of democr

of today but it seems most people don't actually understand what written to reflect the cultural norms of today but it seems most people don't actually understand what the law really protects with 80 percent saying that it shields people from all consequence the law really protects with 80 percent saying that it shields people from all consequences for saying whatever they like the poll also found that almost half of americans think hayden says for saying whatever they like the poll also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal caleb maupin has got more this morning. the u.s. that speech should be made illegal to them opens go more this morning the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet the new cultural norms the fan that it should be updated t

it might not be the norm here today, but this points to a point where it is the norm. the norm as something other than drowning our bay and micro plastics. that is the imperative that we are trying to pursue here. >> okay. >> commissioner zouzounis? >> thank you for the presentation. a couple of clarifying questions and comments. for on-site facilities that require self busing stations. can you define it that would look like if it is a different type of self busing station? does it require a sink? >> so, one of the businesses that was a pioneer in the recent disposable conversation, was right near my house, i go there all the time. they have all reusable food-service aware and accessories there. they don't even have the like a little ceramic cup for salsa. it is otherwise counter service pretty go order, you sit down, and your stuff is served. they have three container busing station already there. it's at the front of house. they are technically self busing. to have that busing station. interestingly, one of the concerns that we have is that people are actually kind o

the fight out of date and that it should be updated to meet the new cultural norms the findings are frankly extraordinary our free speech rights and our free press rights endings are frankly extraordinary our free speech rights and our free press rights have evolved well over 200 years and people now seem to be rethinking of evolved well over 200 years and people now seem to be rethinking them now some would say that it's a wild world of political correctness others would say them now some would say that it's a wild world of political correctness others would say they have a point and that hate speech should be illegal but here's the question who say they have a point and that hate speech should be illegal but here's the question who gets to decide what is considered hate speech well that's a tricky question $49.00 gets to decide what is considered hate speech well that's a tricky question 49 percent of americans say that they want facebook to make that decision but marks and percent of americans say that they want facebook to make that decision but mark zuckerberg is adamant he doe

of today but it seems most people don't actually understand what the law really for sure all norms of today but it seems most people don't actually understand what the law really protects in the 1st place with 80 percent saying that it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequence in the 1st place with 80 percent saying that it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequences further this poll also found that almost half of americans think hate speech occurrences further this poll also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal caleb maupin reports. the usa bill should be made legal caleb maupin reports the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the u.s. constitution that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it to sion but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet the new cultural norms the findings are frank the exc

of 3 that the 1st amendment needs to be rewritten to reflect the cultural norms of today well the 80 percent were unsure about what the law says the poll today although 80 percent were unsure about what the law says the poll also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal as also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal as caleb maupin reports the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom of more open reports. the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but i recommend the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet on a cli most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated to meet the new cultural norms the findings are frankly extraordinary or fit new cultural norms the findings are frankly extraordinary our free speech rights and our free press rights have evolved well over 200 years free speech rights and our free press rights ha

international terrorism, iran, ru russia, refugees and international norms. the current conflict began as peaceful protests against an aud democratic dictator, one of the many uprisings of the arab spring in 2011. those hopes were dashed as we devolved boo conflicts. it survived in power by operating at the intersection of criminality and terrorism. they designated syria in 1979. we know the nature of this regime. assad facilitate d the movement of operatives to attack u.s. forces and he will seek to leverage al qaeda and isis fighters in seyria again when i suits his needs. syria provides safe haven to the world east most dangerous terrorist groups. isis no longer holds territory, but was already reconstituting as an insurgent force. it will replenish ranks with fighters breaking out of did tension facilities today ask will prey on vulnerable communities as the humanitarian situation deteriorates. iran seeks to turn syria into a forward ways base and has exploited the conflict to entrench itself in serious economic and social fabric. strikes and sanctions pr

respect for sovereignty in international law and international norms and peaceful resolution of disputes, fair open and reciprocal trade. that is what we mean when we talk about free and open indo pacific. we see the chinese in the ccp with a different vision. sometimes we talk about the chinese being difficult to understand. project 2049, we had a very sophisticated methodology of trend to understand the ccp. i'm going to share with you. we listen to what they say, read what they write and watch what they do. if you do those things, you will start to see very clearly, a different vision for the future, security architecture for the indo pacific region and one that could be a threat with underlying principles i spoke of, the respect for sovereignty in international law and international norms. we talk about competition of different visions but it is also our belief we need to maintain to include in the military domain in order to promote and sustain the concept of a free and open indo pacific along with other countries that share the same vision in those aspirations. we sometimes hear fr

>> they are finding things that are clearly not the norm and cross the line. are doing now is talking to all the peripheral people. the witnesses, gathering information. and eventually you will see subpoenas to interview people who are potential suspects. trish: meaning? mccabe, clapper, brennan, comey? >> all of the above. if crimes were committed, they were authorized and agents were instructed to commit certain acts. here everything was being done by senior leadership of the fbi. the agent on the streets were exclude from doing the operations they are trained to do. trish: it was a tight-knit group. the former national security advisor michael flynn is accusing agents of lying about his interview with them. it's quite an accusation. what are your thoughts on this? >> again, we are talking the same people doing that investigation. flynn refers to the 302. the 302 is not a form you fill out. it's a blank sheet of paper agents write the report on. the question is do the notes the agents took match what was said and reported in the interview? this is a signific

let's start with you norm ornstein.e're at that spot where the fork in the road sends the president in one direction and the vice president in another? >> absolutely. of course, this is not uncommon with crime families. but, you know, i think there are two points to make here. one is, if you look at this in a macavellian kind of way, if trump got impeached, pence got impeached and both were removed, nancy pelosi becomes the acting president and trump and his people are trying to send a message to republicans, go carefully here. that's one part of it. the second part we have going on here is that we have clearly an effort to try and shield himself, the president, a little bit more from some of the blame going on. and when you look at the article, deeply reported one by greg miller, greg jaffey and "the post," pence's response is i didn't know a thing when his defense adviser, national security adviser was in on the phone call that trump made, that this call, including information about what biden was doing was in his bri

and by the time gene and norm join the discussion at the end of the hour, who knows what else rudy giuliani might confess to? >>> donald trump was asked the question that he cannot answer today by white house reporter jeff mason. it was the best question a reporter has been able to ask this president of the united states in a very long time. and the answer to this question is the very heart of the president's defense against impeachment, if he has an answer to this question. and as of tonight, the president has no answer, which means the president has no defense. and that is why most republicans in congress are not trying to defend what the president said in his phone call with the president of ukraine. >>> here is the instantly historic moment when jeff mason exposed to the world that the emperor has no defense. >> mr. president, can you just make clear right here, what do you or what did you want president zelenskiy to do with regard to joe and hunter biden? >> if you look at what he said, okay, and he brought it up. i think he brought up the name rudy giuliani. what i want is the followi

of those surveyed agree that the 1st amendment needs to be rewritten to quote reflect the cultural norms of today christians that most people don't actually understand what the law really protects with 80 percent saying that it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequences the poll norms of today christians that most people don't actually understand what the law really protects with 80 percent saying that it means you can say whatever you like without fear of consequences the poll also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal report also found that almost half of americans think hate speech should be made illegal reporting next his care them open the usa boasts that it is allowing next his kind of open. the usa boasts that it is a land of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution and of freedom and the 1st amendment is a key pillar of the us constitution but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it should be updated but ironically most americans now think it's out of date and that it

that all the norms have gone outt out the window. there is a great analysis in "the new york times" about how the president has redefined what it means to be presidential. in fact, last night, he mocked being presidential. i want to play that. >> it's much easier being presidential is easy. all you have to do is act like you' you're stiff. look. ladies and gentlemen of texas, it is a great honor to be with you this evening. >> you know, andy, it's one thing to flaunt norms and it's another thing to commit an impeachable offense. and i wonder do you think that because so much of what we're seeing in this administration has been done and said in the open, that in some ways it's almost making it the norm? it has less impact on us than it would have for the president. >> first of all, times have changed. the social media aspect of the presidency are so different and brings the mob much closer to the role and that's always a danger for democracy. i was offended by what president trump did in making fun of abraham lincoln is who he was mak

how is it they can change the map, the norms? we see this in china, human rights abuses, massive surveillance with their technology, interesting questions with their major technology companies operating globally. some interesting questions and president putin has made this a core part of his strategy. whenever russia is challenged, whether its use of chemical weapons in syria or interference in the u.s. elections, the immediate retreat is to muddy the waters, change the framework, and he ends every conversation with prove it. he's trying to change the norms around evidence and proof and we are left on our back heels because we are caught in western ways of proving things and demonstrating things and legitimating actions and it's difficult and they understand if they can muddy the narrative, even change the rules of what proof means, that's a form of power. we often don't think that way and it's part of the domain and we have to think that way. >> and it really is important also to recognize that deterrence is going to have limits

the respect for sovereignty and international law and international norms. when we talk about competition, it is a competition of different visions, but it's also our belief that we need to maintain an edge to include in the military domain in order to promote and sustain the concept of a free and open indo pacific along with so many other countries that share that same vision and aspirations. we sometimes hear from countries they don't want to choose. they don't want to choose between the united states and china. we say we are not asking you to choose between our countries, choose between washington and beijing. if you can support protection of your own sovereignty, if you can support international law norms, we're confident you'll be with us. we seek strong, interpent, and prosperous partners like vietnam and japan. not an erosion of those things that countries value so much. as i said our competition with china is embeded in this regional strategy. we released in june, 2019, at the shankry la dialogue our indo pacific strategy report and talked about the

how is it they can change the map, the norms? we see this in china, human abuses, massive surveillance with their technology, interesting questions with their major technology companies operating globally. some interesting questions and president putin has made this a poor part -- a core part of his strategy. challenged,sia is whether its use of chemical weapons in syria or interference in the u.s. elections, the immediate retreat is to muddy the waters, change the framework , and he ends every conversation with prove it. he's trying to change the norms around evidence and proof and we are left on our back heels because we are caught in western ways of proving things and demonstrating things and legitimating actions and it's difficult and they understand if they can muddy the narrative, even change the rules of what proof means, that's a form of power. we often don't think that way and it's part of the domain and we have to think that way. >> and it really is important thatto recognize deterrence is going to have limits in a way

or dead and norm on or in the office in tel aviv they showed us how easy it is to hack into the device. we took for control that's made it. what makes it possible is that all small vacuum cleaners made by this manufacturer are accessible by the cloud. so even though oded on his team don't have one of their own they can register as new users and replace another users id code with their own. time. then they can access the vacuum cleaner which might be anywhere in the world. so we're actually active here. this applies to all gadgets that are part of the internet of things or i.o.t. it can include everything from small baby phones to televisions heating systems and refrigerators. users can control the gadgets remotely using their smartphone that's because all these gadgets have been on board computer that can receive commands. but if there are security loopholes criminals anywhere in the world can access these household devices and even gain access to personal computers at the same time . can start to do commerce with it and then i can start look which devices there is in line and then sta