. >> where should the notice have been given, 865 market street which is the notice and the front doort the map the radius starts across the street. it is not an important point, it happened to include. >> who at west field did not get the notice? >> the physical location is on the fifth floor of the nordstrom side is 865 market street box a, is the mailing address. >> important to note. >> i want to know specifically you are claiming should have been. >> it should have been dropped in box a? >> correct. >> and it was dropped in every other doorway. >> so it just missed box a. >> except what in the public record would they find that? what if they are doing a search, you have not provided other than the list of distribution lists who should have been accessed or received notice as the owner, if you have not provided any assess or or any other information? >> west field is the owner of the center. >> and i know it, and i know the facility. >> have you not shown us that they should have received notice. >> i would respectfully submit that we are the owner of record and we are the property

. >> where should the notice have been given, 865 market street which is the notice and the front door. but the map the radius starts across the street. it is not an important point, it happened to include. >> who at west field did not get the notice? >> the physical location is on the fifth floor of the nordstrom side is 865 market street box a, is the mailing address. >> important to note. >> i want to know specifically you are claiming should have been. >> it should have been dropped in box a? >> correct. >> and it was

they did not notice our premises of a hearing. they did not give a reasonable notice of hearing. they didn't tell us what we could oh are not say at the hearing. i think at this point we had no place to turn and asked for the appeals board to step interested and look through our case and ask for assistance and getting ourselves a valid hearing in addressing what the neighbors had to say and to say it time for to us sit down and figure out the sound problem but do this in a manner that makes sense according to the laws. we are asking for the city to follow the same rules that they would expect us to. >> thank you. >> we can hear from the entertainment commission oovment good evening board members, i'm candy blackstone, the director of the commission. executive director jocelyn is out of town. you have probably heard and now heard inflammatory accusations about the entertainment commission staff and i hoe that it does not distract from the issue at hand which is a basic issue. whatever is out there they are being handled at the appropriate venues. what you have now is a very simple

but you said that you have gotten notices?he past. >> yes. >> the promissions are the 300 foot radius that you are familiar with and it is curious because the map of the 300 foot radius was from the wrong location and actually notwithstanding that, we actually would still be within 300 foot radius and the businesses are to be noticed whether they are a direct come pet or or not. and there were other tenants noticed i think as kettle corn has correctly noted in the papers and again we are completely conscious of the fact that this was not their fault they tried to do it by the book and it was a strange circumstance that we would get in the other situations through the people using some sort of radius map service, but not in this instance. >> but if other people were noticed and other businesses presumably within west field, what is the harm to west field, then? if those businesses have the opportunity to appeal or raise the concerns? >> west field is the landlord of a very major enterprise and i would believe that most are mana

i think that the constructive notice is important as well. because, if you see and have an opportunity to see the activity that is impacting your business, or potentially impacting your business, that is the time to make an objection, if you didn't get technical notice. and in this case, i don't believe that technical notice was required. i think also that equities don't rely in favor of west field and they are in strongly in favor of the permit holder for having done the right things and based on the code did not or was not required to serve the business, given the time periods of operation. so. if we have a motion? >> sure, i will make a motion to deny the jurisdiction request based on the fact that the permit was properly issued. >> okay, could we call the roll please? >> on that motion, to deny jurisdiction? on the basis of the permit was properly issued? commissioner fung? >> no. >> president hwang? >> aye. >> vice president lazarus? >> aye. >> commissioner honda? >> aye. >> thank you. >> the vote is 4-1, the jurisdiction is denied and n

>> defective notice >> i think that's correct. >> with the finding of defective annoys -- notices at the time of issuance. again to repeat we have a motion from commissioner fung to revoke this notice with defective notice at the time of issuance and the permit holder is not in the room. we would send out a no show letter to her. on that motion, president wang, lazarus, honda? aye. the vote is 4-0. this permit is revoked with that finding. >> we are going to move on. if everyone could leave the room quietly we would appreciate it. we are moving to item no. 10. >> jason perkins, bricks brik and mortar versus the entertainment commission. this feeling approval of may 21, 2013 of additional conditions against the existing place of entertainment permit. you have seven minutes. >> i just want to say thank you to the board for your patience this evening. this is my first appearance. any other name is jason perkins. i started my first business in 1985. i know that i can expect as a business person on what i'm going to receive from the city of san francisco. i know what the permits are going

notices signed from mr. shaik. we were told at that time that because we had not responded to the notices in time, they could not be of service to us. we feel we lost a valuable ally in this process. so it's been proven in the past to help us. why again did we not respond to the notice? the sign posted in part reads any person who deems his interest or property shall be affected by work performed. to us that phrase is crucial. we understood it to mean the actual work itself, dust, noise, objects falling and so on. not a time frame for that work occurring. the letter sent to us in part reads, quote, no action need be taken by you, however, if you wish further info or the proposed work or to inspect plans on the building permit application, we understood this to meet the designs, the plans, the work itself, not when the work would begin. again this latter part is linked to our unique needs, not our neighbors to have to vacate the premises first before the work could be performed and yet, i say our unique needs

what's the purpose of the notice? so people can look at the business. you have a trial and you don't invite the prosecutor or defendant. it made no sense to me. it was a slam dunk that it was not going to approve the permit. this is a place to comment to find out what other people know about the business in case that business is for someone that is very damaging to the neighborhood. that opportunity wasn't given. that could be a bad apple who never got looked at because they didn't post a notice that people needed to know what to say. the comments of course came late. more importantly, is the fact that what does it mean when somebody doesn't post a notice. you can presume that it wasn't intentional, but in all probability, you have to assume if the presumption in this case that they knew the rules and may have had a reason not to. in this case, because of the type of business this would be and who it would bring in the neighborhood, it's more important that this person is outstanding with a high degree of integrity. i know this is not appropriate but i

through the mailing and the notice was provided to us through the radius services. we have a copy of the all of the addresses that this was mailed to and the requestor for the jurisdiction would like to hear that address was not listed on this mailing. and one thing to note, is that the legislation is set up for all of the businesses are notified and so i am not... i am not certain, how the business is defined through the radius service and through the affidavit when they make that initial finding. and what happened is that during this 30-day period the department did receive the objections from the neighbors in the area, and we did provide notice through the newspaper of a public hearing over the merits of this location through the san francisco newspaper. and we had a hearing, a director's hearing on this case and in november, of 2011, we had the hearing in march of 2012, we released the hearing results after careful, evaluation to approve it and the th and fire department certificates and we approved the permit in july of 2012, quoting the sfaf the business day t

. >> did you receive the 311 notice. >> i don't recall getting a proper 311 notice, and one of the things that we started to discuss, did you get the notice or not? there was a general uncertainty. i know that there was a hearing coming up and that is when i sent the first e-mail saying that i travel a lot for my job and i will not be here for the review. >> you knew that it was happening? >> even though you did not get it. >> and i did not mean to interrupt you guys, are you done with yours? >> so i think that this is very important way, and i understand that the developers, and they are interested to make the money and that is great and i fully support that. it is a vacant lot that they own and they have the right to develop it. and however, like we pointed out in the beginning, they don't have a right to be granted variances. the code is there for a reason and this is specialty. >> they purchased both lots and remodeled it and i am very happy with my home and sold that to us for $800,000, more than double what they paid for it and now they have the second lot which they subdivided and

an appeal triggered by the first approval the project and second it approved and enhanced public noticing so people will know when to file an appeal if they wish to do so. and a colleagues i'm happy to report it's legislation it does just that that sets a clear prier including a clear deadline and that approves noticing. those key proirgsz were in the legislation then and today. this legislation will approve our process and treat everyone fairly. for both support elders and opponents of the project they'll know when to file and it has padded. and no multiple appeals under those the significant change has considered. colleagues to get here this legislation has gown through the most extensive process. we had 6 hearing in the land use committee and 3 hearings at the preference commission and 2 hearings and planning commission and 3 round table meetings and many, many smaller meetings with supporters and poernts arrest as a result of this important legislation i made of amendments very positive amendments even before this legislation ever came to the land use committee amendments that were la

it is a long overdue by about a decade ordinance establishing clear procedures and deadlines and noticing rules for the sequa environment quality act. 10 years the law was changed they could be both appealable to the board of supervisors. however, for any sequa organizations particularly for smaller projects san francisco never got around to codifying the procedures and deadlines for the board of supervisors. when i introduced this legislation last november i was the figure out supervisor to codify the appeal procedures after several others. never before have we gotten this far and now it the time after so many years to pass this legislation. the lack of clear procedures means in san francisco sequa appeals are like the wide west. we have no defined deadlines for filing appeals. in fact, before piling filing an appeal it's not possible to know whether your appeal is timely or not. we cannot call the planning department and ask because i won't get an answer. you usually need to hire american people lawyer to tell you something that simple. colleagues as you know, we operate under the so-ca

yeah, so we complied with sequa and chapter 31 of the administrative code regarding the notice. there have been been a lot of notifications and the sponsors has had a lot of meeting at these locations that they are claiming were not notified. >> there is a school that is cross the freeway and it is what it is, barely within a quarter mile radius and the deck said that it wasn't and we missed that and i don't know how that will lead to any substantial evidence that there is any impact that was not disclosed. and so... >> thank you. >> all right. >> commissioners sugaya? >> if there is no motion to continue, could we hear the case. >> good evening, joining me is sarah jones, acting environmental review officer, before you is the negative declaration to the project that concludes the project and 58 foot tall and a mixed use building containing 77 residential units 947 units and 74 parking spaces and it is vacant with no structures and adjacent auto body shop has been using it as a illegal parking lot. and before you and the containing a executive summary and the response to the app

but the variance was applied for in july and we had the hearing last year and that is when the notice went out. >> the next question that i have relates to the vernal heights east slope design board? do they have different slopes? >> yes, there is an organized east slope review board and we do ask for the people to go and see them and have them review the projects. when you say the special use district is that because it is subject to these design review boards? >> no. because there is an over all special use district as legislated and that or has different requirements than elsewhere in the city given the unique nature of vernal heights and that was implemented in the late 80s. >> so what did that, what is the... >> i think that it is advisory only. >> okay. >> capacity. i don't think that there is... there is not a review process where there is an approval or a denial. >> but they are very organized. >> having the support, and i think that in response for finding it for and received endorsement from and is that a... i mean, what is the rate at which we should apply to that in terms

and also, it is not possible for me to notify the lombard street merchant to come on short notice and whether it is unclear and lastly, it is very important to us that the hearing to be continued to allow us an opportunity to give input and in this situation and to question the same impact on small business, if you could please come to lombard street. >> thank you. >> and okay, commissioner, dwight? ? i mean, commissioner white? >> yes, i was just recommending for staff to look into another date, other than july 22nd for this agenda item. >> commissioner dwight? >> i do want to be sure that we have an opportunity to hear comments at another meeting before the planning commissioner is schedule to look at this. because i have personally done some research on this to educate myself. and i do definitely want to hear from the local merchants. >> second? >> any other comments? >> so, do we know then? the planning commission? >> there is still not a date. >> we need to make it the 22nd or a date that staff finds that we can get everybody together and what is convenient. >> is there any reaso

a fin nearby. >> but once the shark notices him, you're on timeout leo! ♪ ♪ some things won't last 25 years. ah! woof. some things will. save up to 20% on an ikea kitchen. you're o♪ ♪meout leo! some things won't last 25 years. ah! woof. some things will. save up to 20% on an ikea kitchen. >>> so you are kayaking off of the coast of ireland having a great time fishing, and then you look beyond your kayak and you see some fin s s in the water aa freaking look. >> look at those fins. >> yes, they belong to a shark. the kayaker decides to paddle, but once the shark notices him, the checking out is in reverse. >> he had an underwater camera, too. >> i know what a shark looks like, and if i'm in a little boat a kayak, i don't need to get close. >> it is a little different and it is not the great white shark, but it is a basking shark. so it is not really interested in humans or other animals, and they eat plankton and they are the second largest fish in the water. >> if i knew it was a basking shark, i would have wanted to get close. >> did you notice the gills

a fin nearby. >> but once the shark notices him, ♪ [ hero mom ] oh, yeah.e're gettin' cereal. 'cause over 40 general mills cereals are 130 calories or less per serving. just look for the g. boom! that's how nutrition is done, people. [ laughs ] ♪ [ female announcer ] hey ladies. you love it. you've got to have it. cinnamon toast crunch, 'cause that cinnamon and sugar is so irresistible. everybody craves those crazy squares.® 'cause that cinnamon and sugar is so irresistible. >>> so you are kayaking off of the coast of ireland having a great time fishing, and then you look beyond your kayak and you ss in the water and a freaking look. >> look at those fins. >> yes, they belong to a shark. the kayaker decides to paddle, but once the shark notices him, the checking out is in reverse. >> he had an underwater camera, too. >> i know what a shark looks like, and if i'm in a little boat a kayak, i don't need to get close. >> it is a little different and it is not the great white shark, but it is a basking shark. so it is not really interested in humans or other ani

this as a pleading. >> if it were noticed properly, and it was right about it. all that we would be talking about is the amount that was redacted in which case when we were talking about city attorney making a determination on it he was clear. >> one of the problems that i have is that it seems to me that part of the mission or the obligation of this commission, is a certain amount of education. and if in fact the arts commission did not follow what 67.26 provides, it seems to me that we had an obligation to say this they didn't. what are the consequences of it? we don't know, it certainly serves as a reminder to these other agency and the commission, that if they are going to redact the material, that they have got to comply with what the 67.26. >> what i don't want is the especially that is what we mean and i don't want to seem like we are saying phone numbers and e-mail address and personal addresses cannot be redacted. >> separate question. >> right. >> so whatever our motion is, i think that we need to be clear about it. because if we said that we failed to

and the length of time and so seven-day notice and 14 day notice and where the commission may feel appropriate for the pending holiday celebrations item 10, i have a question exactly about replacing the fiber glass back board with heavier materials, that is getting to the level of regulating the materials for the back boards. >> i think that we do want to put up a fence which is not on here >> item one is replace the fence with a 6 foot tall fence. and that would be a solid fence with a gap in between the that would be for noise and it is 6 feet tall and there were concerns about the size of the fence. >> i think that this is the existing fence... >> the existing fence. >> the neighbors wanted a lower fence, on the property line. maybe the sponsor wants to address the fence locations? >> thank you, if i could quickly comment on this. >> the existing fence that you saw with the lattice above it could be replaced keeping it at 6 feet we do not want to create a fence that the neighbor on that side experiences badly, but the fence that is there is in poor condition and actually has no sound resist

you get the notice or not? there was a general uncertainty. i know that there was a hearing coming up and that is when i sent the first e-mail saying that i travel a lot for my job and i will not be here for the review. >> you knew that it was happening? >> even though

he will sign off on the royal birth notice.were talking about this in the past. we have no idea and we won't know when this notice comes. i'm betting it won't be ethel. those were names you got before. this baby will be the 43rd. lots of betting going on at the moment. it's anybody's guess. >> maybe becky or michael. >> reporter: how about that? >> you never know. queen becky. i don't know. i think there could be a diana thrown in there. becky, stay cool there. i know you're under a tent but stay cool. it's the hottest day of the year in london. >> take care. >> reporter: 34 degrees. over 90 here. >> they're printing out 2013 coins that they will give to parents born on the same day as the royal baby. >> can you imagine 30 people watching labor. can you imagine can we have some privacy please. >> hope it doesn't go much longer. >>> two u.s. fighter jets have to get rid of extra weight but what they dropped and where has some folks pretty upset. ♪ our business needs more cases. [ male announcer ] where do you want to take your b

then i get another notice stating that they're not fixed.to find out it was one of the squares that needed to put a tree in there. called the urban league. they said i cannot put a tree in there. so, they said to cement that. i cemented everything i had. they fined me. i have proof the stuff has been fixed. permit fees have been -- permits have been filed with the office, but i'm still getting notices for having to come down here and i don't understand why. if everything has been fixed and i do have proof from the cement company that fixed my stuff. can somebody answer on why i keep getting notices, why am i getting fines for something i already completed? >> you'll have an opportunity to speak to the dpw staffer right after your comments. >>> is this dp the clerk of the city? >> any other members of the public wish to speak in general public comment? seeing none i'm going to ask our dpw staffer if you could please escort members of the public that came to speak on this out into the foyer. and when you are finished with your conversation, if

a duration of noticing time. so, the land use committee suggested a 60-day notification period. this week at the full board, supervisor wiener's package of amendments regarding mobile food facilities, food trucks was heard, and all three related ordinances passed on their first reading. one was a planning code amendment and the other two were a public works code amendment that would detail the locational and noticing requirements for food trucks. and the second was transportation code amendment related to permitting and licensing. and then by way of introduction, there weren't many, one that i thought would be of interest to you was that supervisor avalos introduced a resolution regarding historic "street signs" in the excelsior. the resolution would add the original street names as china, japan, and india to the current street signs for excelsior, avenue ~ avalon and peru streets. [speaker not understood]. >> thank you. >> [speaker not understood] the first was an adoption of findings for [speaker not understood

you notice things differently. you notice more about people, and you see people's situations. >> the accident changes the lives of earn involved that night. corporals crosby pan denton are named police men of the month by the national law enforce. officers' memorial fund. >> it's not too often you pull somebody out of a burning fire. >> shawn donates the remains of his car to the police department. it's part of a show and tell presentation to give students on the dangers of drunk driving. >> the pain that i put my family through, and the fact that i could have hurt somebody else is really the reason i did it. i don't want anybody to hurt anyone else. >>> coming up, a simple traffic stop goes from dangerous to deadly. when caught on camera, dash cam diaries, continues. hey, look! a shooting star! make a wish! i wish we could lie here forever. i wish this test drive was over, so we could head back to the dealership. [ male announcer ] it's practically yours. test drive! [ male announcer ] but we still need your signa

paid advertisement is not the same as an notice hearing, notice to the people reading in the library. i believe that it has not been cover mice by that. i am here and i am objecting to your spending 19 million dollars off the your perspective benefits to the city in >> supervisor in tax by waiver, what is happening is the gender discretionary investment. we just have a decision from the supreme court against the discrimination on sexual orientation. there is no less discrimination here that is already prohibited by law, by gender. this is a private school for boys. there's nothing comparable for girls. the committee on the state -- that met yesterday has had no information about this. there is no opportunity for this matter for consideration of gender discrimination and i think you should go before the whole board, open to public input on whether or not this is unjustified discrimination by gender. >> supervisor cohen: the bell that rang indicate your public comment is up. i would like the district attorney to talk about public notice. >> ken drew, deputy city attorney through chair;