it is correct to - say that the nsf p, the cw and the royal— say that the nsf p, the cw and the royald offices within the post office main building _ offices within the post office main building for them to conduct business with the post office. is that something you remember? ami business with the post office. is that something you remember? am i to be in the case — that something you remember? am i to be in the case with _ that something you remember? am i to be in the case with royal _ that something you remember? am i to be in the case with royal mail _ that something you remember? am i to be in the case with royal mail but - be in the case with royal mail but not with the post office. ii'idta�*e be in the case with royal mail but not with the post office.— not with the post office. have you an idea not with the post office. have you any idea what _ not with the post office. have you any idea what the _ not with the post office. have you any idea what the value _ not with the post office. have you any idea what the value of - not with the post office. have you any idea what the va

our partners led nsf members and our community. city certified filipino as the city's official third language in 2014, it should have signaled a full implementation of filipino as a language that must be used in communicating essential city services to the public. by the end of 2015, under lao. however, in 2019, sam, along with doctor valerie francisco and chavez and her team of student research from san francisco state, published a report that shows filipino language access has been unevenly delivered across city departments and agencies, leaving many filipino residents unable to reach basic and important services and information. and to this day, that is still the case. that's why we applaud the efforts of everyone here today and their commitment to strengthening the existing language ordinance with amendments. today's amendments are the right steps toward filling those gaps and barriers our communities are experiencing , and we look forward to a board resolution that will continue our collective effort on addressing key equity c

microelectronics comments in the chips and science act and we won one of the ancient project in the new nsf efforts to create whole new economies new areas of rapidly evolving technology and those are all things that have recently been funded. so for us, i mean things are on fire cottages every possible way. so here we have all of these initiatives, all of this spending, an economy which is making progress, things are making progress. as you try to explain both to ourselves and to others, you know, the role of democracy, the central of democracy as you were saying in his speech, what are the lessons you try to say to our allies, stay the course, or newly emerging democracies like hungary is unfair with the word democracy means. what caught as a come along and evolving a cell phone, how do you help them to understand the importance and the centrality of democracy? >> there are threats to democracy in many parts of the world, including in some of our closest allies. but i think people appreciate what the strengths of a democracy are, that just the certainty of rule of law that you count on cr

of being up on a space station, and i'm going to ask leroy about this because he knows first—hand, nsf all of our problems, all of our of our wars, all of this on a tidy floating in space and we could all do with that, that we are all insignificant we should get along because there's bigger stuff out there. filth. we should get along because there's bigger stuff out there.— bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, es, bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes. right? _ bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes. right? the _ bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes, right? the tiny _ bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes, right? the tiny blue - bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes, right? the tiny blue dot, - bigger stuff out there. oh, gosh, yes, right? the tiny blue dot, we all live _ yes, right? the tiny blue dot, we all live on— yes, right? the tiny blue dot, we all live on this tiny blue dot. i keep— all live on this tiny blue dot. i keep thinking, as i listen to you too, _ keep thinking, as i listen to you too, that— keep thinking, as i listen to you too, that 100 years from now, they are going _ t

half moon bay nsf already in the low 70's. a lot of us never even fell out of the upper 60's to low 70's last night. so this is kind of where we've been and temperatures later today will warm up quickly. some 70's to 80's at the coast and 80's for the rest of us talking more details of this warmer forecast. still to come re to. all right, john, thank you for that. well, tracking in accident impacting the san mateo bridge >> 92 westbound at that 101 north connector drive times been fluctuating between 4 to 34 minutes. other ridge is not saying any act, but you still busy. 15 minutes on the bay bridge traveling into the city this morning, a richmond center fell bridge around 13. at least that's down from 60 minutes. and the golden gate bridge. 37 to tolls. 35 minutes on this thursday. are you guys back to you? thanks a lot. ryan tonight, a one and today the port oakland decides final decision whether put san francisco. >> in the airport's name. kind of controversial. the city of san francisco doesn't like it and it seems like a

secondly, unfortunately nsf said i know that room, you can pull all the legal issues out and put them on the side and very often and narrative can be enough and the office knows that. so that's why when stormy daniels comes office off right and when michael cohen looks like a unsavory character it works for the prosecution and they eat that narrative so if you are on donald trump side of things, it is going to be an acquittal or et cetera, you need to manage expectations because let's just remember this is a manhattan jury. >> kayleigh: it is an trump is sitting there and taking it all an end we are going through minute-by-minute details, as michael cohen testifies. but donald trump this morning had a comment about the gag order and i imagine that his attorneys is whispering in his ear maybe even during the break that the gag order stands in the appeal didn't work, i imagine we will hear some sort of reaction but here's the last, we have from this morning on the gag order. >> they got going to have to come off. so when you asked me a question about the people that we are talking about

nsf is say there are no places to take all of them with severe injuries.t's very much up for debate, the evacuation area. certainly in a part of gaza where the displaced people were told to move, there are governments that now say that israel is not complying with the order even if you were to read it in the way that you interpret. read it in the way that you interpret-_ read it in the way that you interret. ., ., , ., _ ., interpret. no doubt encouraged by a lot of the misreporting _ interpret. no doubt encouraged by a lot of the misreporting that - interpret. no doubt encouraged by a lot of the misreporting that we've i lot of the misreporting that we've heard of friday's order. i think the judgment certainly is clear and enforced, that is reinforced with the separate opinions of the various judges who agreed with the order, and also of the separate opinions by the dissenting opinion —— dissenting opinion. and read in that context i'm afraid what is being said not least in the media but also by many of these states is incorrect, but i also need to be cle

and armed services committees in both classified and open hearings, and then i have testified about nsf and several other testimonies. >> same with you, general mackenzie? >> correct, sir. >> and is your testimony this has anything changed from when you were in uniform and testifying to when you testified today? has there anything that you -- you know -- didn't testify to the for that you are testifying to now? is there any change of you or thought of what to race today from what you testified to previously? >> in general, for me, everything that i testified before is still true and accurate today. in open testimony, that would be correct. i have learned more from advocate because of the investigations. that wasn't available from our previous testimony. but i have since read those investigations and been briefed on them, but they weren't available at first >> you testified today, and it is still basically consisting? >> yes. totally consistent. >> in general mackenzie, same for me. >> there's not really anything, you, learned today, because you testified to it before. right? >> i will l

supervisor warden's office and natalie for working with the community, the language access network, nsfto improve and strengthen our language access, you know, for our immigrant community in the city. so we encourage city department all to look into the new amendment and how it will impact on the budget, you know, priorities and we encourage the city department to prioritize language access, especially in this, you know, challenging budget year. thank you. and thank you for addressing this committee. and if there are no further speakers, madam chair, that completes our queue. thank you. seeing no more public comments, public comment is now closed, supervisor walton, would you. yeah thank you again, chair chan. and thanks again to oca, the, immigrants rights commission. of course, my chief of staff and entire community for the work, as you can see, the fiscal impacts that were presented from the bla obviously, this is a dream scenario. if we were able to achieve this through the budget process, we're still having conversations with the mayor's office, still going through negotiations in

supervisor warden's office and natalie for working with the community, the language access network, nsfto improve and strengthen our language access, you know, for our immigrant community in the city. so we encourage city department all to look into the new amendment and how it will impact on the budget, you know, priorities and we encourage the city department to prioritize language access, especially in this, you know, challenging budget year. thank you. and thank you for addressing this committee. and if there are no further speakers, madam chair, that completes our queue. thank you. seeing no more public comments, public comment is now closed, supervisor walton, would you. yeah thank you again, chair chan. and thanks again to oca, the, immigrants rights commission. of course, my chief of staff and entire community for the work, as you can see, the fiscal impacts that were presented from the bla obviously, this is a dream scenario. if we were able to achieve this through the budget process, we're still having conversations with the mayor's office, still going through negotiations in

so that students have access to the fare free transit they deserve, and that's enjoyed by berkeley nsftate students as i understand that process. the ball is currently in city college's court on that. and finally, i just have to say, we heard in the presentation that the team held over 24 outreach events for this project. some of those definitely helped improve the project, but that's also nearly one outreach event per parking space that we're talking about here. and it's a supposed quick build project that began over a year ago. staff has done an extraordinary job working through the process they've been given to get this done. it's no knock on them, but it's time that we literally can't afford. so i hope that we can work to fix this process so that quick build projects are the public outreach process and are back to the six weeks or so that was originally conceived when the program started. thank you. thank you for your comment. next speaker, please. i'll read more speaker cards. fred mÜlheim, ed pike, adolfo velasquez, luisa gutierrez guzman good afternoon. my name is adolfo velasqu