when the obama administration used the same tactics more than the trump administration.esponse to this has been tremendous because there are pictures and video but let's tell the story here, look at the media coverage regarding the obama administration and the use of the same tactics, teargas at the border. here is the coverage from the big 3 networks when obama and his administration did the same thing, 0 minutes across the border. something to see when you put it that clearly. >> selective outrage and networks going all in on the democratic messaging just to deter and damaged this presidency. the mainstream media will never ever ever talk badly about president obama and will only air selective pieces from when he attacks the president and quite frankly the service to the american people seeking real news and more importantly not interested in politics being played here. >> >> and you see numbers like that. what do you think of the american people who want that information. >> the mainstream media will never give the president a fair shake because they don't agree with

the trenton administration 15 in 2014 and it goes on with pepper spray as well in 2012 the obama administrationsing pepper spray on migrants 95 times 151 times. but why is there so much outrage when the trumpet administration does when obama did it as well quick. >> i cannot speak to the hypocritical outrage but i do know that i don't know if we get into what happened under obama or trump but teargas was deployed well within the force and with what the constitution and with what the constitution says we can in the supreme court said we can doem. if you are being assaulted they are throwing concrete and bottles and rocks you have the right to respond those are considered deadly physical force you can respond to deadly physical force we should say thank god the men and women are so professional that they showed so much restraint they used a less or intermediate force which was teargas we have all been teargas herself so we know what it's like so having them shoot at people to stop the threat we use teargas which worked well. ed: that seems reasonable they use that to slow everything down not real

mexico" the president wrote that 60 minutes knows that we have the exact same policy as the obama administration and that obama separated children from parents as did president bush. that is the policy. 60 minutes reported that the trump administration separated children from their parents for more time than most people

the department of homeland security says that from 2012 to 2018 the use of tear gas by the obama administrationtrump administration you can see there, 26 and 2012, 27 in 2013, 15 and 2014 and it goes on and then pepper spray as well going back to 2012. in 2012 the obama administration used pepper spray on migrants trying to cross the border 95 times. in 2013, 151 times. i won't bore you with all of the numbers but why is there so much outrage when the trump administration do something that it turns out the obama administration did as well? >> i can't speak to that may be kind of hypocritical outrage or faux outrage but i don't know if you want to get into what happened under a far more president trump, the fact is the teargas was deployed well within the use of force continuum, well within what the constitution says we can, with the supreme court has said we can do so when you are being assaulted, people are throwing rocks, bottles, chunks of concrete at you, you have the right to respond. those are considered believe it or not deadly physical force situations and you can respond with deadly ph

does not excuse the obama administration for not doing anything. at the end of the day, mitch thennell had zero power and new york times, didn't they publish a famous article? people did have trouble processing i think the degree and purposefulness. of the russian interference. in the russian conspiracy to meddle in our election. americansifferent were involved in the conspiracy, obviously, we hope the special counsel bloodlust of us -- will let the rest of us know. and cars were diagnosed persons. the republican party. i think the party was pretty anti-putin. the pressure within congress was for a more hawkish stance against putin. they stuck with the nominee. i don't want to blame everything on trump. he is partly a symptom but he is also a cause. once he is a nominee, the whole play begins to adjust. we have seen it adjust in two years in a way that is distressing to me. presidents are powerful. they shape parties when they are president. the degree of accommodation is shocking. i think it is very -- mcconnell, to the degree mcconnell made a dif

administration. so what has changed since obama left office? r one, the rhetoric has changed completely and iran is no longer identified as a potential partner it's an adversary. number two, the administration has worked closely with allies in the region in the middle east and outside the middle east to begin to rebuild a kind of anti-iran coalition. most notably with saudi arabia and israel. as mark noted that is not just a diplomatic implications but it also has military implications as well and particularly with the country like israel which has significant military capabilities which is using in syria against the irradiance. the israelis can use that power with these confidence that the united states will support it diplomatically. and the support which it needs particularly with respect to moscow. the israelis can act with greater impunity and also in the clandestine world which we don't know for a fact mark said we now know that there are covert actions being taken against iran's nuclear program. we don't know who it is presumably the isra

this was the view of the obama administration, repeated publicly in their compliance reports to congressand amplified by this administration, including most recently, secretary of defense mattis's briefing with the secretary of nato a few weeks ago. the response of the obama administration to the palpable violations of the treaty was to simply keep talking. now, we are at a point in terms of russian violations, where the president has decided that we are going to get out of the treaty. people have said, oh my goodness, can't you just try to bring the russians back into compliance? let's review the bidding on that diplomatically. the american position is the russians are in violation of the treaty. the russian position is they are not in violation of the treaty. let me ask you this. how do you bring the russians back into compliance when they don't think they are out of compliance to begin with? that's the reason the president made it unmistakably clear about 10 days ago that we are going to withdraw from the inf treaty, and i think that would be entirely justifiable if i didn't even have

in fact, tear gas was used on average once a month during the obama administration for similar circumstances.

despite the fact that many on the republican party had accused the obama administration is not paying enough attention to nuclear issues, obama was able to do with the bush administration was not able to do, create a bipartisan consensus in favor of modernization. that was also attached to arms control. i would argue that the new start training in 2010 was very very critical in building that bipartisan support for the modernization. had we not had the new start treaty, i think it would've been difficult to bring aboard many congressional democrats and jim played a big role in the negotiations on the new start treaty and i commend him for his work. however, that consensus is beginning to fray for a few reasons. one is the potential price tag of the modernization program. i see dave in the back there and he and his colleagues at cbo came out with a report earlier this year saying the modernization will cost 1.2 trillion dollars over the next 30 years. that is a lot of money. when you compare that with all of the other challenges, i think there are legitimate questions on whether we can

way the obama administration viewed the internet and the way the trumpet ministration viewed the obama administration was fully behind net neutrality and it said it's a utility it is there for the public good it it's a right it is not a privilege trump administration says not a utility it is a privilege that you need to pay for so a really fundamental difference now what's interesting is the f.c.c. with their restoring internet freedom order and i just love that because it did nothing to restore any internet freedom but it's one of these sort of orwellian in the regulatory terms overturned. net neutrality and there was a lot of controversy about it because many of the larger iowa speed broadband providers and if you look at it bart it's eighteen t. verizon and comcast which has eighty seven eighty eight percent of the market they did a very vigorous and knew probably know this from your days on the hill very vigorous assertive lobbying effort to repeal mit neutrality and so this is where out right now the landscape now is entirely different it means that there is censorship which is bo

they didn't cover its use under the obama administration. coming up. >>> plus, a new house hearing is expected in a couple of weeks on the justice the president's probe into pay to play at the clinton foundation after new data shows toe nations there plummeting after hillary lost. >>> and the cdc now confirming 116 cases of polio-like paralysis in the united states. more on that with doc siegel coming up next. stay there. ♪ ♪ ♪ the greatest wish of all... is one that brings us together. the lincoln wish list event is here. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with $0 down, $0 due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. only at your lincoln dealer. and a complimentary first month's payment. is important to me so father being diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer made me think of all the things that i wanted to teach my kids. (avo) another tru story with keytruda. (roger) my doctor said i could start on keytruda so i did. with each scan things just got better. (avo) in a clinical study, keytruda offered patients a lo

part of this is getting the word out that this is not the obama administration, although you might think they would have figured that out by now it never hurts to stress your brad and every once in a while, when someone notices that something's gone wrong, they say the good old days are gone, they. >> the final question is to the executive director mentioned religious liberty, and the laying of the wreath, what is the role of human rights both as a tool of great power competition but also the intrinsic good for our national security policy . >>> it's obviously a critical element that's why it's in the strategy. i was one of the original members of the commission on international religious freedom , what was established back in 2000, so, to me it's always been an important part of the policy. i think you have to look at it as part of the objectives that america seeks. we don't disguise and we shouldn't disguise and we shouldn't apologize for what our system does for freedom around the world. we have a lot of allies that are not in the same position we are, it's not a value judgment it's a

e do you think it is just the fact that they wmething that you and president obama and the obama administration accomplished? >> i think more the latter. but let me say, you know, trump has decided to get outf paris, right. but the rest of the world is staying in it. it makes you ask, what does president xi know? what does president putin know? what does president macron kn?? chancellor of germany -- what do all these people know that donald trump doesn't? you don't ha to answer that. seth: yeah. [ laughter ] by the way, "almost anything" would be the right answer. >> smart play. >> seth: yeah. [ laughter ] yeah. >> but -- [ applause ] but, you know -- but the climate change thing, there's actually a lot of hope. number one, we are seeing 38 states in the united states that equal 80% of the population of our country, are staying in. they're still pursuing laws they have in those ates to move to

under secretary of state who helped negotiate the iran deal ring the obama administration. is deal that you worked so hard on survive the reimposition of sanctions by the trump administration? wendy: there are certainly a lot of people who do want it to survive -- not only iran, of coarse, but eaiope, great br france, germany want to see it survive. they are trying to put together a special-purpose vehicle to allow trade to go on. when we imposed sanctiring the obama administration we had the entire world with us enforcing those sanctions. that is not the case now. we will see. i think the iranians will b watching our election very closely. if they think that donald trump is going to be around for a my guessry long time is they will be back to the negotiating table. if they see wholesale chan tomorrow in our election, theywi try to hang on, i think. laura: interestingly, 8 countries including china and india who buy a lot of oil from iran are getting a temporaryom exemption he sanctions. the president says he does not want to ive oil prices up. what you make of those exempti

this is not the first time the issue of whistleblowers has raised concern and the obama administration during his two thousand and eight presidential campaign obama had pledged support for washed dogs revealing wrongdoing in government on taking office however he oversaw an unprecedented crackdown on whistleblowers in his two terms as president eight individuals are prosecuted under an arcane one hundred year old bill called the espionage act more than double the number of prosecutions under previous administrations combined. media and legal analysts lionel says it's unlikely the cia will change the way it operates anytime soon. what are the repercussions what do what happens i mean if you're brennan if you're clapper and you say this and don't know worry about it responded that nothing happened but rick more importantly the biggest problem is not that is that the american people don't we report on those and you know what there's a what do you do hey work that's the way it goes remember one of the tobacco people came up with the shorter oath it was known nicotine is not addictive remem

under the obama administration there was an agreement to which cars reach an average of 45 miles per gallon. the trump administration proposed to freeze the standards from the beginning of 2020. you and other states have sued over that. and i believe you probably expect a ruling in the coming months. how does this mess get resolved? why is if such a significant issue? do you see any comprise? >> brady, first, i want to make something clear. when we go to court, it's not because we're looking to oppose the trump administration. it's because we, in california, cannot afford to backslide. we have demonstrated you can be clean when it comes to air and water and be prosperous. so with 40 million people, we have an obligation to create good paying jobs that give people a chance for a good quality of life in the state of california. so we can't go back to the battle days where we pollute more. it would cost our businesses and industries billions of dollars if they were to try to descend to the bottom in the race to pollute. we're going to defend everything to make us number one in clean ener

guest: that is different from the obama administration. it is seen severe and pervasive.ch means a one-off incident of sexual harassment may no longer meet the harassment of sexual harassment that colleges must investigate, but if it is and itd and pervasive, is denying somebody the ability to go to class oracle about getting their college degree, that is the kind of conduct congress would be obligated to take action on. again, a one-off incident alone may not, repeat it might be the threshold. host: quid pro quo harassment and sexual assault. can you speak to those? sexual assault -- sexual misconduct is able spectrum, sexual harassment, sexual assault, unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, and it is a little bit more serious, it seems. one other important change in the proposed regulations is that previously in cases of sexual assault, colleges were not allowed to have mediation, which is an informal regulation process, going to a formal hearing investigation type process. the new proposed regulations would actually allow mediation for these sexual assault cases. that w

strong case. >> briefly, to play off his remarks -- he made the point -- the argument that the obama administration rushed its review at the end of the term and i believe he said that this administration's heavy standards will save lives. takes a broader considerations rather than just climate change. i would like your reaction to that. >> i don't know if you i can walk you through the logic of that statement other than to say that by allowing cards to burn dirtier that people will buy more of them because they will replace some of their earlier vehicles and the dirtier vehicles will be heavier. so that if you are in an accident and you are in a heavy vehicle chances are you will survive a little better. it flies in the face of the evidence that shows that today automakers are showing -- selling more vehicles than ever and they are cleaner and lighter and they get better gas mileage. a ford f1 50, the most popular vehicle in america today, gets more mileage than a ford taurus of a few years ago. so, for the administration to say that they can just put a halt to our progress on the environment and n

vice president cheney was much more aggressive and negative about the obama administration for the entiretime. >> okay, so i'll go to you, larry, what say you? >> we're talking about the presidents and vice presidents and obama undid the signature achievement of george w. bush and that was the war in iraq.he when george bush left office he thought there was going to be a stay behind force of between five and 10,000 troops and ther was a vacuum. obama comes in, pulls out every single troop and george w. bush didn't say one word as things got worse in iraq as he predicted. itit t was certainly true that president cheney said something. president bush didn't say a word . ronald reagan retires, doesn't say a word. george w. bush goes to robert, texas, doesn't say a word. jimmy carter, bill clinton, barack brock obama never stop talking. that's a different perspective between republican and democratic presidents. >> austin he may have a point i seems to be the democrats. >> i don't think that's quite accurate.as >> what wasn't accurate? >> donald trump is in the sense that barack obama did not

the fact that the cia on the obama administration was reading congressional staffs e-mails about i'm told it's commuted to whistleblowers raises serious policy concerns. says it was just conducting routine counter intelligence monitoring the cia viewed e-mails between the intelligence community inspector general's office which protects whistleblowers and capitol hill staff. this is not the first time that the issue of whistle blows has raised concerns under the obama administration during his two thousand and eight presidential campaign obama had pledged support for watched on surveilling wrongdoing in government on taking office however he oversaw an unprecedented crackdown on whistleblowers in his two terms as president eight individuals were prosecuted and an arcane hundred year old bill called the espionage act more than double the number of prosecutions under all previous administrations combined media and legal analysts lionel says it's unlikely the cia will change the way it operates anytime soon. what are the repercussions what what happens i mean if you're brennan if you're

so you know, what did the obama administration do?> the obama administration was a friend of saudi arabia. there's pictures of them. david: he bowed to the king. does anyone remember that? >> a bombing mission which is led to more deaths than this journalist. every president has problems doing with this country because it's an imperfect situation. david: as for journalists working in dangerous places. paul krugman coffered for "forbes" magazine, editor of russian "forbes" was killed on the street of moscow and a lot of fingers are pointing to putin for that. member paul kolesnikov. quickly, we've got a run. >> never understanding, you're right. obama did stand up for mubarak. he showed up. how does that -- david: will keep that question open. we've got a run. the president says we have a fed problem. the real problem a big sides debate is coming right up. (clatter) ( ♪ ) feeling unsure? oh... (nervous yelp) what if you had some help? introducing the new 2019 ford edge with the confidence of ford co-pilot360 (tm) technology. the most a

trump administration creating a situation where people don't even get to apply for legal asylum. >> greg: for one thing, they aren't gassing children. what they are trying to do is say under obama these things at adults but the trump administration, they are aiming at kids! that's not true. that's fake. here's an uncomfortable truth. in terms of pepper spray and gas, trump has actually, sounds to me obama did it 80 times? trump uses less of it because trump's stance on immigration was unambiguous. he was metaphorically the wall. he said don't come here. we are going to repel you. we do not believe you are refugees. we believe you are cutting in line. give a message and fewer people were coming. therefore you didn't need to use these kind of dispersing effects. i think president obama may seem more compassionate but by being ambiguous about the border and not telling people right away what our stances encouraged people to come and then you have to disperse them. the compassionate way is law and order and telling them this is what's going to happen. if you come here, this is what's going to happen. the best answer is compassion and order. that's why we let in hundreds of thousand

vice president cheney was much more aggressive and negative about the obama administration for the entireime. i respected george bush's approach. >> judge jeanine: i'll go to you, let me go to you, larry, what say you? >> we're talking about president's, not vice presidents. and obama undid the signature achievement of george w. bush, that was the war in iraq when george bush left office he assumed there was going to be a stay behind horse of between 5,000 and 10,000 troops troops. predicted what would happen if there was a vacuum. obama pulled out every single troop. george w. bush didn't say one word as things got worse in iraq. as he predicted. it is true that vice president dick cheney said something but george w. bush didn't say a word. ronald reagan retires, goes simi valley, dus saint a word. george herbert walker bush, dus saint a word. george bush goes to texas, doesn't say a word. clinton, brovm, never stop talking -- barack obama, never stop talking. >> judge jeanine: and he may have a point, it seems to be the democrats coming out. and i have to say -- go ahead. >> well, i don

to play off some remarks by administrator wheeler, he made the point the argument that the obama administration rushed its review at the end of its term and said, i believe he said that this administration standards will save lives. it takes into broader considerations than just climate change. and i'd be interested in your reaction to that. >> i don't know if i can walk you through the logic of that statement other than to say that by allowing cars to burn more dirty, or dirtier, that people will buy more than because they'll replace some of their older vehicles. and that these dirtier vehicles will be heavier and so that if you are in an accident, you are in ha heavier vehicle, so chances are you'll survive an accident a little better, it flies in the face of the evidence that shows that today auto makers are selling more vehicles than they will have and they are cleaner and lighter than they've ever been and they get more gas mileage. afford f150 which is the most popular vehicle in america today gets more gas mileage than afford taurus of just a few years ago. and so for the administration

administrationhere -- believe it or not, during the obama administration there was bipartisan consensus on the need to modernize our nuclear delivery vehicles and infrastructure. despite the fact that many on the republican party had accused the obama administration of not paying enough attention to nuclear issues, obama was able to do what the bush administration was not able to do, create a bipartisan consensus in favor of modernization. attached to also arms control. i would argue the new start treaty in 2010 was very, very critical in building that bipartisan support for the modernization. new start had the treaty, i think it would've been difficult to bring on board many congressional democrats. and jim played a big role in the negotiations on the new start treaty. and i really commend him for his work. jim: thank you. frank: however, that consensus is beginning to fray for couple reasons. one, of the potential price tag of the modernization program. i have seen dave mosher in the back there. and david and his colleagues at cbo came out with a report

they were not allowed to fully do their job under the obama administration.hey could deal with criminals, but for the most of part they were frustrated and they were thankful president trump encouraged them to do the job they were trained to do. liz: texas is not the only state seeing a wave of early voting. it's the same story in florida and it's a big high stakes battle there. we are live on the ground in the sunshine state next. then we'll take to you georgia where brian kem is facing a close race and there are explosive issues. all money managers might seem the same, but some give their clients cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. we were

the color of best-dressed list when michelle obama was turned into a fashion icon under the obama administration. milania has said she thinks she is one of the most bleed people in the world. shannon: people mocked her for saying that. >> i know they did but this is the perfect example, trying to shine a light on infants who were born addicted to opioids because of the choices of their parents and we are talking about red christmas trees. it is a sad time when christmas decorations are becoming part of political discourse but that is where we are in this country. >> and the news that ivanka trump used a lot of personal email discussing things regarding travel and being contacted by white house officials and others, here's what she said on good morning america. >> everything has been preserved and archived, they just is no equivalency between the two things. my emails of not been deleted nor was there anything of substance, nothing confidential. >> i will start with you. people say is this something the president hammered hillary clinton on for years. >> a lot of us love ivanka trump, she is pois

especially at the end of the obama administration english hillary was secretary of state.he blames her for a lot of things. the orange revolution in ukraine he blames her for because she gave speeches in response to what happened in ukraine. and a lot of the stuff that was, a lot of the anti-putin movement like pusey writes and other things inside russia were focus more on the net estates as being the bogeyman that all this. >> he took the traditional strength of the president which hurt them. it took their money, oligarch buddy andy decided we're going to be adapted and the asymmetric and we will put a president in that cannot be a traditional present and we will remove all of those norms. they did anything they one. >> i agree with you. we did some things we didn't do nearly as much as the could have done either bush or obama. and he was happy to have defeated hillary clinton. i think he felt genuinely emboldened by fairly non-robust policies. >> i just want to say a word on behalf of sanctions and asset freezing which was not a tool of u.s. government before magnitsky.

consistent with the aclu's staunch nonpartisanship, i want to draw a comparison with the obama administration on this issue. on one hand, president barack obama himself repeatedly and strongly spoke out in favor of campus free-speech, including for racist speech, including for misogynistic speech. in fact, when i looked at the index for my book, i saw that it quotes from barack obama more than any other person because he was such an eloquent advocate of counter speech, not censorship, as the most effective way to advance equality and diversity and dignity and inclusivity and all of those wonderful rights that the student activists are championing. on the other hand, president obama's department of justice did not follow through. nor did the office of civil rights and his department of education. in particular, these agencies actually undermined campus free-speech in a key respect through a distorted concept of sexual harassment that encompassed even constitutionally protected expression about sex or gender as some leading civil rights and women's rights activists complained about the justice

the obama administration refused to call it a military coup because if they had, they would have been compelled by law to withdraw military funding from the military regime, which was imposing a regime of brutal terror. honduras became the murder cap although of the world -- capital of the world. a fraudulent election took place under the military junta. again, harshly condemned all over the hemisphere. most of the world. but not by the united states. the obama administration praised honduras for carrying out an election moving toward democracy and so on. now people are fleeing from the misery and horrors for which we are responsible. and you have this incredible charade taking place, which is -- which the world is looking at with utter astonishment. poor, miserable people, families, mothers, children fleeing from terror and repression for which we are responsible. and in reaction, they are sending thousands of troops to the border. the troops things into the border outnumber the children who are fleeing. campaign,arkable pr they are frightening much of the countrtry into believing we

his policies have sought to dismantle the obama administration administration and other past democratic and republican administrations. we need work around donald trump. we'rall redsy mang progress. we may nget the policies we nee but we're seeing enough action at the state and local level and what our businesses are doing that year on the path to meet our obligations under the paris treaty. in a couple years maybe we can elect a president willing to help us in this transition. >> thank you so much. >> thank you. >> perhaps the biggest impediment to inict aing any kind of law will be president trump plp he has openly questioned whether it's real. >> the united states will withdraw from the paris climate accord. i was elected to represent the citizens of pittsburgh, not paris. >> i don't think it's a hoax. i think there's probably difference but i don't know that it's man made. i don't want to give trillions and trillions and trillions. i don't want to lose millions of jobs. i don't want to be at a disadvantage. >> i want great climate. >> so there is the science of climate change and th

the aclu's staunch nonpartisanship, i also want to draw a comparison and contrast with the obama administration on this issue. on the one hand, president barack obama himself repeatedly and strongly spoke out in favor of campus free-speech including four racist speech, including four >> three distorted concept of sexual harassment that is even constitutionally protected expression about sex or gender sexual rights or women's rights activists complained about the justice department under the obama administration. , the administration recently also took some other action that also undermines campus free speech. mainly it is endorsed and overly broad definition of anti-semitism which would stifle debate on crucial issues about israeli and middle east policies. i am convinced that free speech is ultimately the strongest weapon and the only potential weapon against any form of hatred, including anti-semitism. two weeks ago, i had the honor of sharing the stage with noam chomsky at the university of arizona. it was a terrific program about campus free-speech. i would like to quote chomsky's trenchant

ways that will last long after his presidency julian smith was she should know during the obama administration she served as deputy national security adviser to vice president joseph biden she was also director of european and they took policy at the pentagon for the u.s. secretary of defense. there she is and tonight she is right here with me at the big table she is a fellow with the robert bosch together here in berlin and julie is going to have you on the show there's a lot to talk about and one of the. i mean where do we start where do we still where do we start and what do you say you are now on this side of the pond what do you say when europeans ask you why is trump seemingly always complaining about europe well it seems that trump essentially always has two questions in his mind one he wants to ask our friends in europe what they're spending on defense are you and the european allies meeting the target to spend two percent of g.d.p. on your defense that's a nato target that's first on its mind the second thing that's on his mind is what is our trade relationship look like and are there

initiatives of the obama administration. block, a decision to block anything on obama's agenda. that nod be bothered by matter what party. i watched president trump's press conference today. president was not respectful for much of the conference. he did ok at some points when he stayed on script. i thought the reporters. the reporters conducted themselves very well. att: i'm going to leave it that. jon tester is speaking. we will go to that now. >> early 2007. i am not a veteran. that welt it important staterom veterans in this . i will never forget the first meeting. upad a vietnam that stand and say you are not going to treat this group of veterans like we got treated. i took that to heart. -- y day [cheers] 12every day for the past years i have thought of that man . we have done everything we can do. we have more to do to live up to the promises we made. the fight is not over yet for the man that is you it -- is retired u.s. army. not just democrats. republicans and independents, libertarians working together the same way my grandparents did . they built that red barn, worki