these big think tanks and oecd and who and nato or whatever. of that and focus on being unapologetically america first. if that's what it takes to sign an executive order say no oecd, you don't get to do that, that's what it takes because that's what the american people voted for. lauren: chars, what's your take on the star gate business, ai revolution ponying up all the money? c love it. lauren: why not. charles: my son was at investor conference and said we have to take a step in the right direction. two, three weeks ago and china came out with deep seek. ai product. it was pretty good. >> they're like light years ahead of and yous that's scary. charles: we have the data sentedder lead and all that stuff, we cannot -- this is tortoise and hare stuff and can't fall asleep at the switch. larry: give them 15% tax rate down from 21. charles: that would help. larry: not the worst and less governmental regulations. >> deep state expenses. permanent. larry: steve forbes, if mr. trump is forced to take tough action with mexico, cause they're not goin

it's an urgent call for us to address the problem that the share of our population is 27 out of 35 oecd countries come that we need help people get back to work. the sharing economy to be part of that but also presents a number of challenges. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you. senator cortez masto. >> thank you, mr. chairman, ranking member and thank you for the time he spent with me in my office talking about the issues that obviously are important to so many of us particularly in nevada as well. it's nice to see her family here. welcome. appreciate your commitment to public service. dr. hussan let me start with you. we had this conversation me follow up. in 2013 you said in a written research peace quote, with lackluster gdp growth rate become our new normal, allowing more immigrants to enter for the sake of employment is one of the few policies that might restore our old normal. has he was doubled its immigration portal to bring in new workers picket at more than half a a percentage point hero expected gdp growth, unquote. despite the clear evidence indicating you are correct,

between 2009 and 2022, the oecd found children in england raise up in math, reading, and science. conservative government action means english now tops the western world at maths. the prime minister's schools bill, which is being voted on committee this week, reverses the improvements that have happened. this bill is an act of vandalism. it's a cross party consensus -- it is wrecking a cross party consensus that has lasted for decades. why does the prime minister think so many school leaders are criticizing this bill? >> mr. speaker. p.m. starmer: -- in the first place to drive out. that is what it is about. also in that bill or important provisions for protecting children, including a provision to stop of users taking children out of school, a unique identifier for your whereabouts are all children are known. what does the opposition do? instructed all of them to vote against those measures. >> he did not even bother those things on that bill, mr. speaker. you talk about safeguarding measures, that's not what the issue is. we have an example of where these reforms were not introd

relations, the united states needs to have a coherent trade policy with countries other than the g7 oecd countries , which means a number of the emerging markets, global south. the problem is, in this administration, which you would have thought would have been inclined in that direction, it has been the opposite. like the previous administration, they opted out of tpp. as the chinese and others have developed closer trade ties not just through build and road but to other various groupings, they have used those for strategic collaboration as well. the problem in the united states is, a, we have not done that in the last eight years. b, the political environment in this country is very negative on any trade deals at all it appears. but has never really been educated to the point that you made, that if you want to have a long system of alliance and give other countries alternatives to dealing with china or other countries, you need to have some glue holding them together with united states and others. that is largely in the area of trade. so my question is not just saying that we need clos

one rescission i except liked was ending the the biden agreement with the oecd to raise a global taxerican businesses. many of the order z returned -- orders returned us back to first-term policies. some of them were new ideas lik- [audio difficulty] security clearances, the deep state anti-trump officials, what fun is that? and then some doge regulations. that's that's new. and then recognizing two genders. in trump world, male and female. ending dei and on and on. while he was signing 50 or so executive orders the oval office last night before he went out to the galas, he simultaneously held a news conference for about an hour. so it's not far -- [audio difficulty] mr. trump still has much to do to clean up biden's mess and straight the then out the country, but all things are possible with an optimist who believes in the american dream of success and talks about golden eras. what a welcome relief from the dark ages of joe biden, from the fundamentally pessimistic -- in society that is always held by socialists and progressives everywhere. you know, for them it's all about the stat

these foreign oecd countries would be able to tax american companies, okay? >> yes.ways said this. david malpass, you know, you were the oval. he always said only the american legislature, meaning congress, can tax american businesses. >> right. larry: foreign countries cannot tax american business, and he said it again today. david, hang on one second. i have more tape on tax cuts to davos. hang on one second, here it comes. roll tape, please. >> -- majorities in the house and senate which we also took along with the presidency are going the pass the largest tax cut in american history including massive tax cuts for workers and family and big tax cuts for domestic producers and manufacturers. we're bringing them down very substantially even from the original trump tax cuts. larry: all right. david malpass, what's interesting is he didn't really mention tax cuts much. the inaugust a ration speech was a very, very good speech, upbeat, optimistic. it wasn't much of an economic speech. but here, as steve moore said, this is just strong economic stuff and tax cuts. what

deaths are higher than practically any other oecd country, and americans are also obese relative to otherich countries. we have an obesity rate that's 50% higher than the average in europe. >> and the good news is these are coming down. so let's talk about them. um, car deaths, are they are they coming down a lot? >> yeah. car deaths have come down relatively significantly. what i think happened here is a pure pandemic effect during the pandemic. i think you saw an outbreak of a lot of antisocial behavior. people were driving around like maniacs. and you saw car fatalities just really surge. but in the last few years, car fatalities have come down a lot. and that's very important because if you look at the cdc numbers for the most common cause of death among people in their 20s or 30s, it tends to be what they call unintentional injuries or unintentional accidents. those tend to be car accidents. >> what about drugs? well, you know, this is the thing we hear so much about the drug, the opioid issue, fentanyl. are those deaths coming down? >> this is a really interesting mystery. why are d

his tax policy that you were just talking about was pulling the united states out of the oecd agreement agreed to that virtually would rip away $120 billion worth of profits from u.s. companies and strategically allocate it to the everyone else and not even allow these foreign governments to respect and appreciate our global minimum tax. charles: it really is nuts, i mean, to voluntarily cede our greatness, it just boggles the mind. and, of course, i look at germany being the poster child, poster country for this nonsense. they've given away so much greatness. what's on the drawing board next? a lot of talk about one big, beautiful bill, you know, getting all the things through that you can't get with an executive order. will are congress be able to step up and help experioduate the process? >> we're working as a hard and as fast as we can. i've been pushing for the one big, beautiful bill much like what president trump has been pushing for. in this bill we can do his immigration policies that need to be passed into law, his energy policies that need to be passed into law, budget cuts a

it's 30 stunning how i think the average output now counting the imf and the oecd and we also have wall street firms, that those average forecast have all got up around 3% which the cea was saying during the tax debate we passed the tax bill should probably get about 3%, then was ridiculed by partisans opposed to the bill. if you look most everybody looking at it is a you would get growth like that. we think it's not just serendipitous but it's completely sensible that growth would go up about that much because of the tax bill and they can without referencing today's durable goods release which is the key capital spending source of capital spending data, if you look at 24, the fourth quarter that capital spending advanced 11%. so building an enormous spike in capital spending. our models predicted a spike about that scale because the technical term, dependent which type of u-uppercase-letter looking at we were expecting ten to 50% of expected level of debt would rise about one for one. i think we would guess there's a ten or 15% increase in capital spending and in the fourth quarter was

so if we were talking at the oecd or at the united nations, other places where internet governance decisions were discussed, then typically the democratic nations of this world would say, we are in favor of a multi-stakeholder process. and it is also important as an avenue to bring in civil society. i think that that's sort of practically how it's been used to say we need everybody at the table. civil society matters, human rights organizations matter, you know, digital rights organizations, they deserve a voice so this is the political context within which this whole multi-stakeholder governance model has grown essentially what i think has happened too much is that there has not been a critical look who the stakeholders, exactly how they show up, who they represent, and what those processes are captured for. because at table two are, you've guessed correctly, the tech companies as a but if you have, let's say, a representative from amnesty versus a representative from microsoft, you cannot claim that these are each a simple stakeholder, that each have a voice because they represent such dif

out of the paris climate accords, the world health organization, and the oecd global tax deal. asylum trying to end birth right citizenship. and he issued a 90-day pause in any foreign development assistance. sort of a striking split screen here with davos going on this week, america first was threaded throughout every piece of these actions signed yesterday. and then finally, one last thing to flag, the white house has told us to expect what they're calling as a big infrastructure announcement later this afternoon. so more to come -- on that fron. guys? >> big infrastructure, remind me of the first trump administration. every week was infrastructure week. i notice the shares of electric vehicle makers, tesla but lucid and rivian are down. is that because -- the paris climate pulling out of that, or the rollback of ira? >> reporter: it could be any of those things. also ending tax credits that were incentivizing people to go with electric vehicles, all of that being off the table. i think it could be any one of those. but what we know is there's going to be much more to come on

relations, the united states needs to have a coherent trade policy with countries other than the g7 oecd countries , which means a number of the emerging markets, global south. the problem is, in this administration, which you would have thought would have been inclined in that direction, it has been the opposite. like the previous administration, they opted out of tpp. as the chinese and others have developed closer trade ties not just through build and road but to other various groupings, they have used those for strategic collaboration as well. the problem in the united states is, a, we have not done that in the last eight years. b, the political environment in this country is very negative on any trade deals at all it appears. but has never really been educated to the point that you made, that if you want to have a long system of alliance and give other countries alternatives to dealing with china or other countries, you need to have some glue holding them together with united states and others. that is largely in the area of trade. so my question is not just saying that we need clos

i'm deeply concerned the oecd is working hard to finalize pillar 2 guidance before the change in administration. we have warned the agreement which mandates a global minimum tax implements a utpr provision and unfairly treats u.s. tax credits as that your mental to the country's tax sovereignty, american ingenuity, the federal treasury and our economy. our allies would be best served with partnering with the incoming administration, not with one halfway out the door. i asked consent to submit this op-ed for the record. chair smith: without objection. rep. estes: the americans across the country have suffered under historic inflation thanks to the damaging policies of the outgoing administration. kansans need economic relief in the trump tax cuts are a surefire way to deliver it. without the tax cuts, taxes on nearly every american will go up. the average taxpayer in kansas would pay over $2200 more in taxes if the trump tax cuts are allowed to expire. by extending the 2017 tax cuts we will avoid this tax hike and allow americans to keep more of their hard-earned money. making the trump tax cuts

us to address the problem that the share of our population working is something like 27 out of 35 oecd countries. i think the sharing economy can be part of hitting people that -- getting people back to work. sen. cortez masto: thank you. welcome and thank you for the time you spent with me in my office talking about the issues that were important to so many of us and it's nice to see your family here. welcome and we appreciate your commitment to public service. we had this conversation. in 2013 you said in a written research piece, with lackluster gdp becoming the new normal, allowing immigrants to enter for the sake of employment is one of the few policies that i think would restore our new normal. the u.s. could add more than half a percentage point a year to expected gdp growth. despite the clear evidence indicating that you are correct, here we are in 2017 with the administration pursuing precisely the opposite policies. the president's policy of mass deportation is sparking panic and fear in many latino unities, causing consumer spending to fall by double digits. this is threaten

i worked at the oecd 30 years ago and at the same structural issues exist existed then.chance that if we have a change in government to the center and stronger centrist government, that they will ease up on the debt situation and do more fiscal expansion. if i had to bet on europe changing policy for whatever reason they may change macro, they seem determined not to do the things that we would call fundamental micro structural reforms. annmarie: steven englander, thank you for joining us, standard chartered bank. michael, thank. francis collins free reworking -- france calling for reworking. dani: both bringing up trump in the context of it should be a wake-up call for your. policymakers are already talking about the point you are making. annmarie: he is pushing against the wall and they will have to react. dani: they will have to compete against each other in europe. do you think now is the best time to invest in europe? michael: not yet. dani: they are forcing them to get out of their own way. it is what you will hear from trump administration officials. they may be th

. >> well, if you look at what the imf and the oecd have said recently, they've set out that we willgrowing at a fast rate over the coming years. and if you look at what pwc said, for instance, we're the second best investment location in the world only after the us. so there is cause for optimism. >> but no, but the actual figures aren't looking particularly positive. in fact, some economics experts think that we might actually go into recession. so if we go into recession, what does that say about rachel reeves growth pledge? >> well, all of the headlines say to me, we need to go further and faster to boost growth. and that's why what the chancellor is setting out. >> today will happen if we go into recession. james murray. >> well, we don't want that to happen. we want the could it happen. we want the could it happen economic growth to be boosted and. >> could it happen though? >> could it happen though? >> well, what we want to do as a government is make sure economic growth is as strong as possible. and 1518 00:08:03,704 --> 00:08:03

between 2009 and 2022, the oecd found children in england rose up global league tables in maths, readingcience. conservative government action means english schools now top the western world at maths and reading. the prime minister's schools bill, which is being voted on in committee this week, reverses the improvements that made this happen. this bill, this bill is an act of vandalism. it is wrecking a cross—party consensus that lasted for decades. why does the prime minister think that so many school leaders are criticising this bill? >> the prime minister? >> the prime minister? >> mr speaker, it was labour that introduced academies in the first place to drive up standards. academies are here to stay and will continue to drive up standards. that is what the bill is about. but also in that bill is about. but also in that bill are important provisions for protecting children, including a provision to stop abusers taking children out of school, a unique identifier to ensure the whereabouts of all children are known. what did the leader of the opposition do? she instructed all of them to

between 2009 and 2022, the oecd found children in england rose up global league tables in maths, readingnservative government action means english schools now top the western world at maths and reading. the prime minister's schools bill, which is being voted on in committee this week, versus the improvements made. this bill is an act of vandalism. it is wrecking a cross—party consensus that lasted for decades. why does the prime minister think that so many school leaders are criticising this bill? it many school leaders are criticising this bill? ., , ., ,., ., this bill? it was labour that introduced _ this bill? it was labour that introduced academies - this bill? it was labour that introduced academies in . this bill? it was labour that| introduced academies in the this bill? it was labour that - introduced academies in the first place to drive up standards. academies are here to stay and will continue to drive up standards, that's what the bill is about but also in that bill are important provisions for protecting children, including a provision to stop abuses taking children out of