that one of the speakers of the security forces of viktor yanukovych’s government at the time, oleg tatarovring the maidan, he held a senior position in the ministry of internal affairs, he even received the title of honored lawyer of ukraine during the maidan from the hands of viktor yanukovych, now he is the head, deputy, excuse me, head of the office of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi. and this is such a very irritating, i would say, moment for the current ukrainian government, which is constantly in fact are mentioned to the current ukrainian authorities, but i think that on this day it is important to remember it again, oleg tatarov said, he called the protesters persons, radical persons who are capable of anything, that was his communication at that time, although he said, of course, he was just a communicator and announced the official... position of the then government, we will end the broadcast on independence square, i urge you to subscribe to radio liberty's pages on the internet, where there are even more stories about the maidan, memories of the maidan, stories of

oleg tatarov said, called the protesters individuals, radical individuals who are capable of anything his communication at that time, although he said of course that he was just a communicator and announced the official

accused of fraud, he was not even detained, well, i can remind you, yes i can remind you, how oleg tatarov protected from the nabu, the case was transferred to the sbu, there it was buried, well, actually, about this kind of top corruption, anti-corruption experts are now saying what they want, what tatarov's head wants, yes, because there was a case, the case was buried, why not? no, look, i'm here in this case, in tatarov, you need to... ask specialists in tatarov, why there, what nuances worked, just for such cases, when they say that it is not serious, it is not global, i will tell you, any case. on corruption is very difficult, because proving the very fact of corruption is very, very difficult, it is a certain art, and it is an operation that must be carefully planned, because it is necessary to catch a bribe so that it is proven, documented, recorded, if this does not happen, or there the fact of the bribe can be questioned, the whole case will fall apart, and that's why in fact, such... even if it doesn't matter what the amount is, there is 1,000 dollars , there is a million dollar

times remain working in these structures, many questions are raised, for example, the figure of oleg tatarov, during the revolution of dignity, he worked as the deputy head of the main investigative department of the ministry of internal affairs, and now he works in the office of the president, whether some people can somehow influence the term the trial of cases, on the trial of cases, is there such pressure from certain people or is there not? well, let's proceed from the presumption of innocence, and a person cannot, as a prosecutor, of course, i can only provide an assessment from the point of view of criminal law, criminal process, a person is not considered not guilty until his guilt is established in the established according to the law of order by the court, that means theoretically, theoretically we can talk about some kind of influence. some kind of hindrance, however, i want to dwell on the problems that are real exists with a judicial, let's say, terms of judicial proceedings, because we have , for example, from the point of view of the exemplary process, the same process that re