find a better job earn more money than they can do with home but it's not possible to overthink all thosepeople from all the countries who have. lost their payment that is is as high as we have it in australia and therefore you have to differ very clearly between the refugees and migrants are refugees which means people who have come to australia out of security reasons they have the right to stay here but they have to integrate and all the others they are selected all they have to go back because we cannot know what they billions and tens and hundreds of millions. million people all over africa all of us to come to the right thank you so much mr fast lad for this interview we're talking to you there in a fast eleven former minister of national defense of austria discussing the diplomatic rift between russia and britain and what role awestricken play here and another hear a pin issue is that is it for this edition of so i think oh i'll see you next time . thank you all the best. zia's says harlan kentucky. the place you go three sundays leave. a co money city it was almost no coal mines l

then to get attention off the epa administrator pruitt to create a new storyline i think people overthink the strategy but that is a lot of what informs my thinking and how i try to think about how he views the because it helps to interpret what he does give account to view the world? >> a lot of us versus that makes broad assumptions people are out to get him. he also rarely closes the door on anyone. everything is an ongoing dealer negotiation which is why you can see him fire people but he never does it himself tweeting is not the same thing that that striking of these relationships may never look as appealing as when they are walking away so you make he has publicly criticized you in the new york times that impact your reporting that is a time honored tradition governors have done it he might do it with his own fingers on the twitter keyboard but at the end of the day it doesn't change anything that for most of his career as a developer so he felt rejected someone from those outer boroughs that he was not taken seriously. >> a new yorker headline last year that chomps favored foul. th

i think people overthink the degree to which there is a strategy. of what informs my thinking. and also how he -- i try to think about how he views the world. >> how do you think he views the world? >> there is a lot of us versus them and he makes broad assumptions that people are out to get him. he also rarely closes the door on anyone. everything is an ongoing deal. that is why you can see him fire people. he never does it himself or rarely because he is controversy averse. then he strikes up those relationships again after they are gone. >> he has publicly criticized you and the new york times. does that impact your reporting? >> no. this is a time honored tradition. many presidents have done it. many mayors and governors. mostght he doing it the explicitly and with his own fingers on the twitter keyboard but at the end of the day, it does not change how we do anything. it is with remembering that the new york times for most of his career as a developer in new eliteas a symbol of the who he felt rejected him as someone not from manhattan but from the outer boroughs. that the

too close sometimes we can't let go right now i'm overdosed but i'm never over you ♪ ♪ i know i overthinkou ♪ you'd think by now we'd had enough ♪ ♪ these sleepless nights make fools of us ♪ ♪ am i keeping you or are you keeping me ♪ ♪ i don't know what it is ♪ but i just can't leave ♪ sometimes we get too close sometimes we get too close, sometimes we can't let go right now i'm overdosed but i'm never over you ♪ ♪ i know i overthink ♪ and it makes you overdrink ♪ and we say things we don't mean ♪ ♪ but i'm never over you ♪ never over you ♪ never over you ♪ never over you i'm never over you ♪ ♪ i i would let you go if i could let you go i'm not over you never over you ♪ ♪ i i would let you go if i could let you go ♪ not over you ♪ ♪ never over you ♪ sometimes we get too close sometimes we can't let go right now i'm overdosed but i'm never over you ♪ ♪ sometimes we get too close sometimes we can't let go right now i'm overdosed but i'm never over you ♪ ♪ i know i overthink ♪ and it makes you overdrink ♪ and we say things we don't mean but i'm never over you ♪ never over you ♪ ♪ ooh ooh ooh

people over thing to do -- people overthink the degree to which there is a strategy. that informs my thinking. and i try to think about how he views the world. it helps interpretive --. interpret a lot of what he does. >> how do you think he interprets the world? >> there is a lot of us versus them. he rarely closes the door on anyone. everything is an ongoing deal or negotiation, which is why you can see him fire people but never do it himself because he is very confrontation averse. by tweet is not quite the same thing. then he can strike up these relationships with them once they are gone. publicly criticized you in the new york times. -- and the new york times. does that impact your reporting? >> no. many presidents have done it. many governors and mayors have done it. he may be doing it most exquisitely and with his own fingers on the twitter keyboard. it doesn't change how we do anything. but it is worth remembering that the new york times, for most of his career as a developer in new york, was a symbol of the elite. he felt rejected a somebody not from manhatta

people overthink the degree to which there is a strategy. that is a lot of what informs my thinking. and how i tried to think about how he views the world. it helps interpret what he does. >> how do you think he is the world? >> a lot of us versus them and he makes the assumption most people are out to get him. he rarely closes the door on anyone. everything is an ongoing deal or negotiation, which is what he fires people but never does it himself because he is confrontation averse. he can strike up relationships with them again once they are gone. people do not look as appealing to him as when their walking away. >> he has publicly criticized you and the new york times, does that affect your reporting? >> no. it is a time-honored tradition. many presidents have done is -- done it, he may be doing it the most exquisitely at with his own fingers. at the end of the day, it does not change how we do anything. it is worth remembering that the new york times for most of his career as a developer in new york was a symbol of the elite who he felt r

people overthink the degree there is a strategy. that is a lot of what informs my thinking. also how -- i try to think about how he views the world. it helps interpret what he does. >> how do you think he views of the world? of us versus lot them, and he makes the presumption people are out to get him. he rarely closes the door on anyone. everything is an ongoing deal or negotiation, which is why you see him fire people, but never do it himself. by tweet is not the same thing. he can strike up relationships with them again once they are gone pete -- once they are gone. >> he has publicly criticized eu and the new york times. does that impact your reporting? >> no. working the refs is a time honored tradition, many presidents have done it. he might be doing it the most explicitly with his own fingers on the twitter keyboard. he is trying to affect coverage, but it does not affect anything. it is worth remembering the new york times was a symbol of the elites he felt rejected him as somebody not from manhattan, from the outer boroughs, that seem of not being taken seriously. t

it feels good to him, and i think people overthink the degree to which there's a strategy so that's a lot of what information my thinking hand also just sort of how he -- i try to think about how he views the world because it helps interpret a lot of what he does. >> and how do you think he views the world? >> there's a lot of us versus them and makes the a broad assumption that most people are out to get him in some way or another. he also rarely closes the door on everyone. everything is on ongoing deal or negotiation which is why you can see him fire people and then -- and never do it himself because he's very confrontation averse or rarely do it himself. by tweet it's not quite the same thing, but then he can strike up relationships with them once he's gone. people never look appealing to donald trump when they are walking away. >> he's publicly criticized you and the "new york times." does that impact your reporting? >> no. i mean, this is -- working the ref is a time-honored tradition. many presidents have done it, many mayors and governors have done it. he might be doing it mos

the future but it the problem and the challenges will increase and therefore it is necessary to overthinkeuropean politics and also to establish new instruments and tools in order to have a better control at the goals of. of course if you need the consensus of twenty seven countries as we have to do in european union this is a long way this is difficult this is a proses that lasts but it's there is the clear will to do so because otherwise this what they jobs of the overall consensus within the e.u. all and therefore i am sure that we will find solutions in the coming months and i guess. that also will come through contributions quell the paid during its presidency in the second half of this year by year old government used to support a refugee quota system and that's all changed now for vienna does that mean the refugee quote as the idea that countries have to accept a certain number of refugees whether they like it or not is gone for a good while the law it is the actual official ruling is that countries should always take more or less a certain number but of course you cannot enforce i

don't overthink it. whatever new opportunity comes your way, jump at it. >> those are goodords to end on. is he seal richards stepping down from planned parenthood, so nice to have you here, and ngratulations on your new book. >> thank you very mwich. >>> tha do it for us. you will find more of our coverage on kqed.org/newsroom. i'm thuy vu. thank you for joining us. robert: unrest at justice in e white house, on the hill and conflict in syria. i'm robert costa. a former f.b.i. director's book ignites a firestorm and the russia probees conti. tonight,." on "washington we >> no one to myeclections asked so what's coming next from russians? how might we stop it? robert: president trump reacts with fury, unleashing a barrage of tweets about comey's allegations. james comey is a proven leaker and liar, trump wrote, addings t wa my great honor to fire him and the russia investigation takes a dramatic turn. the president's personal lawyer now in court after an f.b.i. railed may have captured aud recordings. an

don't overthink it. whatevenew opportunity come your way, jump at it. >> those are good words to end parenthood, so here, and e you congrat nions on your>>hat ll d. you will find more of our overage o kqed.org/newsroom. i'm thuy vu. thank you for joining us. captioning sponsored by wnet on >> sreenivasan: his edition for sunday, april 15: ongoing reactions to the missile strikes in syria. washington readies itself for james comey's book tour. and, a photographer's lepbcy. next on newshour weekend.ou >> "pbs newweekend" is made possible by: aernard and irene schwartz. the cher philip milstein family. sue and edgar wachenheim, iii. dr. p. roy velos and diana t. vagelos.j. thb. foundation. the anderson family fund rosalind p. walter barbara hope zuckerberg. corporate funding is provided by mutual of america-- designing customized individual and group retirent products. at's why we're your retirement company. >> ad

. ♪ >> you should never overthink things you.never have to explain things too much to people. you have to leave a little mystique. a little mystery. or else it kind of spoils the whole game. that same mystery extends to his creative passion. something you might have missed had you just walked by this gallery in new york. hanging on the walls, are the visual extensions of bernie taupin's lyrical talents. >> lived in my imagination for, 68 years. >> this is the result of that? >> this is the result of it. >> he started painting in the 90s doing it quietly for the most part. until, one of his pieces found its way in front of collector, exhibition curator, dana jager. >> i said who is the artist? >> they said bernie taupin. i said who is that? >> really, you didn't know? >> no idea. >> but he immediately saw something that went beyond his celeb celebrity. and he convinced him to put some of his works on display. >> i only write when it is time to make a record. now, quite honestly, i mean, this its definitely my day job. >> this scul

>> i would not overthink it or assume there was strategy. it was moth to a flame.ack, got a question, couldn't bring himself to say nothing. >> this is a striking aspect of the president. he likes to talk. he likes to be available. he likes to take questions. it is a rolling conversation that he is in charge of. the problem is you become exposed in those things. it is hard to remember, no, no, i can't answer at all. here's the other piece. ultimately the he potential to depose him. that's what they want. clearly stormy daniels and her lawyer want that attention. >> a judge already shot that down, areva. >> no. he hasn't shot it down. he said it was a premature request. >> but today is it, is today a still premature request? >> it is clear to me there will be a deposition if this litigation continues. they did not say he won't be deposed. they said we need to make some determination whether this gets is sent to private arbitration. >> to me the is striking aspect of this story is the biggest pit fall is obviously a legal pit fall. we have seen it with clinton. he do

. >> i think you are overthinking about it. you don't have to think about wanting a partnership. to think about wanting to get your kids a nice christmas gift or holiday gift. kennedy: i have no problem wanting stuff and paying less for it. >> we buy textiles and rubber and all times of things to china. and we sell them things as well. the greatest opponents to the threat of this tariff war has been the pork producer and soy bean manufacturers. a big portion of the soy bean crop goes to china. think about your own life. kennedy: isn't that selfish, jonathon? >> hopefully so. it should be more selfish. in a free country you don't need a president autocrat to make deals on your behalf. kennedy: do you wake up in the morning and show your kids a picture of gordon gecko? >> i kiss my girlfriend, then i kiss the picture of gordon test. test. test. test. test. kennedy: on this day in 2015, the people's pants suit announced her second run for the presidency. but as hillary always says, if at first you don't succeed, try again and if you don't win, blame every one. we we begin in savanna

the importance of vladimir putin, are we overthinking it? >> i do not think we are. the problem is, we run the danger of becoming to normalizing outrageous behavior on the part of the russians. thinking that that isn't as outrageous as it is. in the united kingdom, they are willing to take provocative steps to do outrageous things. they have kidnapped and estonian intelligence officer off the border. we've seen nuclear saber rattling and the russian military has exercised the invasion of our allies in the east. we are not over exaggerating or dwelling too much on mr. putin when we talk about it because part of what we have to do in our own policy is not just respond with expulsion here and sanctions here, make it absolutely clear to the kremlin that they cannot cross certain lines and expect a response. that's why article 5, our commitment to the baltic states, and alliance, is so critically important. >> dana: damon wilson. thank you for your expertise. for the first time, the mueller probe has resulted in a prison sentence. we are learning new details about the dir

>> well, you can accuse the obama administration of overthinking the engagement in syria and the problemnow we have with donald trump is there seems to be no thinking about what the goal is in syria. if you bomb assad any further, who are you doing it for? there is no negotiation process in which different parties are coming to the table. there is no discussion about what happens if assad goes. really all we have is iran and russia engaged every single day in support of the iran regime -- assad regime. we have israel also targeting strikes there in syria. and you have the united states as of last week saying that the fight against isis is over. that is the technical reason the united states has been engaged there, is to defeat isis. when donald trump said that was over, he gave a full signal to assad that he could unleash chemical weapons on whoever he wanted with impunity in his own country. so now we have a problem. what is the goal of the united states? will we hear that from the president tonight? is it punitive? is it humanitarian? is it because we want to be playing a long game in

. >> matt miller, i'm constantly reminded not to overthink trump's strategery, if you will. sessions and the solicitor general have formed sort of a d.o.j. bond. it can't exist in a vakument. if they're bonded together, they're against him. can you speak about the reality of how the justice department functions and how it's supposed to work like that with those men working together and being independent from the white house, particularly one they are investigating? >> it goes back to the point peter raised about the saturday night massacre and the idea officials at the justice department don't want to be seen as toties for the president. they don't want to be seen as carrying out inappropriate orders and they highly value the department's independence. there is something in the water at d.o.j. you don't have to be there very long to hear about the saturday night massacre and it's always held up as the singular event in the department's history where senior officials decided that they would not cover up wrongdoing for the president and they were willing to resign their jobs o

. >> i obviously think there's a chance of overthinking it, basically, going into this season maybe the good news can just be good news. when stock prices were down, estimates held up. so you wonder if you have still that standard 3% beat on top of us but that's all, you know, noise. theoretically it should be supportive i think the market over the last five or six sessions has been increasingly tuning out the noise. the noise away from corporate fundamentals you saw that today with the drop in this index. that's a little bit of a new kind of lower reading that i think suggests some kind of normalcy >> the tone of today's rally is interesting. the best performing sectors on the s&p 500 seem to have a more defensive bend opposed to technology and financials. >> well, they're okay. they're not down that much the more growth oriented names if you get earnings and they're good, they're fine jb hunt had good numbers ryder is going up. i'm really -- i think this is going to be very driven by the earnings if you can do a decent number, i still think there's upside >> to your point, it's defini

maybe they overthink it, but no one came up with the idea that ronald reagan did get bottom line, dot the money or do you think you should go to the government? i know it's a simplistic argument, but he was very effective in just saying these economic arguments notwithstanding. we gave you back money that washington was taking in a washington ironically is getting more money than it ever has. if that argument work in? we can oppose it isn't. what do you think? >> is giving more money than it ever has, yet we are still seeing our debt and deficits. spending more money than ever. it comes down at the end of the day the argument, which i believe the simplistic message reagan high would definitely help convey in getting bipartisan support and that he was better in terms of -- he was more effective allocating my money or your money. big brother, the government or uni in terms of giving back to charities at the local level we think are working and doing well versus the federal government picking and choosing winners and losers. i think that's what it comes down to in the end. do you think