at home, we are looking at three roofs: the roof of pan jesus, the roof of our ulasna and the roof of another chalavek. and our motto is this year, menavita in the hour of play, fierce respect for three roofs, that is, looking at your family, as if from the side, which is not a useful pit for help, which is the process i am experiencing my life, and what can i tell mr. yesus on ... equally revered by different faiths, both catholics and orthodox gathered to pay tribute to the shrine. the holiday will take place in during two days the forum is part of the events dedicated to the twenty-fifth anniversary of the formation of the vitebsk diocese. the hot summer with belarusian radio continues. this time the interactive music festival was held in the shopping center stolitsa. the guests of the event were pleased with modern high-quality music, quiz draws were held, and cool prizes were presented. stolitsa, its hosts prepared an exclusive selection of rock hits for listeners of all ages. this is not the first event that we hold, the idea to hold it has long been there in general, such mass

at home, we sit and look at the three roofs, the roofs of pan jesus. the roof of your ulasna and the other chalavek, and our motto is now, changing the hour of polygamy zvernuts respect for three years roofs, that is, looking at your whole life, from the side, from the side, which is not a painful pit, what kind of problems i am experiencing in my life, and what i can tell mr. jesus, most holy mrs. mary this is the month, holy month. well...

the tree of the saint has a roof, yadoma, we are meeting we look at the three roofs, the roofs of pan jesus the roofs of another chalavek, and our motto is now, change in the hour of pilgrimage, the best respect for the three roofs, that is , looking at your brother, like on the side, not in the pit yes, what kind of problems do i experience in my life, and what can i tell mr. yesus, the most reverend mrs. mary and this. from mensk, navat, from slabodki, well, you can say it, from syabroskaya, we have a play, i plan that in the coming times there will be more of us, menavita from all belarus, from the first chargu, geta mesa, what a practical thing we give adkaz on torture, what i don’t grab in life, i know. on other occasions, barefoot , all this time, on the occasion of the holy shrine, this year for me, this year i celebrate the 70th year, and there the intention for this year was the change of play. here , where i am magic and significant for i'm a catholic, here's a taxi ride with xiand alegam u butslau na daroz, it was a long ride, even 145 km, that's another way i drive... there were

of russia in the pan-european context, you say that the source from which we drew christianity was unclean, and they talk here about byzantium, pushkin objects, oh my friend, wasn't jesusist himself born a jew, and wasn't jerusalem the first among the gentiles, the gospel from this, is it any less amazing, we took the gospel and tradition from the greeks, but the spirit of childish pettiness, but not the spirit of childish pettiness and word-squabbling, that is , he also denies chiadaev the rightness, and he did not limit himself to criticizing chiadaev. pre-petrine history. and he writes: " as for our historical insignificance, i absolutely cannot agree with you. the warriors of oleg and svyatoslav, even the feuds between appanages. isn't this the life full of seething imagination of ardent and aimless activity that distinguishes the youth of all peoples. the tatar invasion is a sad and great spectacle. the awakening of russia, the development of its power, its movement toward unity, toward russian unity, of course. both ivans, the majestic drama that began in uglich. is all this really not history, but just a pale one?" there is such a point of view that what he wrot

pan-european context. you say that the source from which we drew christianity was impure, and they talk here about byzantium. pushkin objects: "oh, my friend, wasn't jesus christ himself born a jew, and wasn't jerusalem a philistine ? the gospel of this, isn't it amazing to me. we took the gospel and the tradition from the greeks, but the spirit of childish pettiness, but not the spirit of childish pettiness and strife. that is, he denies chiodaev the rightness here too. he did not limit himself to criticizing chiodaev's pre-petrine history. and he writes: "as for our historical insignificance, i absolutely cannot agree with you. the warriors of oleg and svyatoslav, even the feudal strife. is this not the life full of seething imagination of ardent aimless activity, which distinguishes the youth of all nations. the tatar invasion is a sad and great spectacle. the awakening of russia, the development of its power, its movement towards unity, towards russian unity, of course. both ivans. the majestic drama that has begun. is all this really not history, but only a pale , half-forgotten dream, and peter the great, who is one whole history, and catherine ii