e and where the superintendent is and finally the last parcel was 1340 bush. i was never sure why this one was on the list but it's essentially the play ground for redding elementary school and we lease the garage and generate $100,000 from the parking garage so if you look at what's left i want to give you some sort of -- a brief glimpse of what we're looking at now, what we think is in our portfolio so what is left we have the hunter view park, and the former bee site at 200 middle point road. it's a vacant building and we can make that part of the redevelopment going on and not just for malcolm x but for sf hope above and we are in conversations with them trying to make something happen. i think the staff agrees that this isn't a property we are concerned about leveraging for revenue but for the good of the community at large. the former principal center school and actually the former francis scott key on 42nd avenue is kind of a bad tooth in a neighborhood that is not getting -- the neighborhood is getting better and the property is actually getting worse

and since we resulted in only one parcel, we figured we might as well cut to the chase so that i'm not around in 10 years and someone is reading this legislation, everyone knows what it's referring to. >> okay. [speaker not understood]? but i also understand the concern. if we don't clarify, if there are no -- if there are other secondary structures in the c-3-r. >> [speaker not understood] they did have concerns when applied to a larger grouping of properties. so, that was also another reason we added to give them the assurance this would in perpetuity apply to only this one parcel. >> and just to clarify again, the secondary unit, there is a hotel and then the current [speaker not understood]? >> correct. [multiple voices] >> secondary structure, yes. >> okay, great. i think -- i'll just make a couple comments and that's just that i note there are a number of different issues swirling around this planning code change including both the design which is not before us and also the labor issues which are also not before us. but i'm really glad to see that through this process facilitated

that that only applies to one parcel it's printout to make this clear which is why we're recommending that the one that effected property be referenced in the ordinance. this recommendation is not substantive. the downtown project pursuant to planning code section including the finding i proposed. and before the zoning administrator is for the transparency 1 foy .1. it was heard yesterday by the hpgs. the property is located in the downtown retail will project and a is category 5 rating. the subject property contains 5 hundred and 5 square feet complex with two above ground where it as a retail structure. it has an slaeld plaza and basement below the site. it involves the levi store. it replaces the retail structure and in a minute's the hyatt structure. it will have a rectangle plan and the back of the house is a narrow wing between 9 buildings along west street. in total the proposed proposals will have a net decrease in scapegoat. the retail will be reduced from 4 to 2 stories and replacing the it will to a rectangle. and incorporating the existing fountain destined into they could

they wanted it to be a constrained number of parcels. i think when we saw it was only affecting one parcel there is better ways to graft this and by all means if the commission has a different idea those are recommendations we can forward onto the board >> not having it in front of me i know thinking about an su d maybe an alternative way to do this. interrogating new definitions for this project is a little bit clumsy for me i'll loaf it there for new. with regard to the questions that commissioner moore raised. the variance and a transparency question is that about the building form or does it extend into the plaza. >> for section 145.1 is for the plaza itself would not have the transparency itself but to follow up on the special obvious district i think through either method through the code amendment or the special use amendment you'll be describing the allowances in the as a way so you'll have to use the same terminal so i don't know if an su d would be more simple. >> that's helpful.

this since this legislation is a limited scope and only applies to one parcel, we think it is prudent to make it clear in the legislation itself which is why we recommended the block and lot in the affected property be referenced in the ordinance itself. this amendment will help planners or members of the public review this ordinance in the future understand its applicability without expanding amount of time system through the data. at the february 6 planning commission hearing, a motion was made to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance. the commission voted 3 to 3 on that motion which constitutes a failed motion. since the motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance failed, it constitutes a recommendation of disapproval. however, it's worth noting that after the failed motion, the planning commission approved the apple retail store project itself throughout downtown project authorization and approval that is contingent on the approval the proposed legislation. and that includes the necessary findings which are outlined in this legislation. that concludes my presenta

it's situated at the parcel's perimeter which means that it connects the shipyard development to the existing neighborhood along donahue. phase 1 of the shipyard will be mostly residential neighborhood with market rate housing and opportunities for low and moderate income families consisting of phase 1 affordable housing program. [speaker not understood] 18 affordable rental units on designated site as you can see on this map in orange and the map also shows the location for block 49. in addition to the agency units, lennar is required to provide 15% of all developer units which is a total of more than 1100 units as affordable units. the original pda contemplated the toe at of these developer affordable units will be provided as inclusionary units throughout the market rate development. 70% of such units or 134 units at 80% ami and remaining 30% at 50% ami. together with the 218 units that will be provided by ocai we'll be talking about 410 affordable units on phase 1 of the shipyard. the sixth amendment to the phase 1dda modified affordable housing program allowing lennar to shift t

they were parceled out by redevelopment and they're at the candle stick point >> sore supervisor farrell. so people actually own property underwater in the bay >> in the bay. one case one person won a prosperity in the pokerer games and it's a nice conversation but they're responsible for paying the taxes >> okay. >> so in practice few if any actual dwellings are auctioned off because the person may redeem or pay off the taxed the day before so this is in fact the last time, we had the auction in 2011 all the prosperity were redeemed prior to the auction we consider this a success because the tax auction is an important tool for the property taxes. which are, of course, the cities largest revenue source and provides money for roads and transit and a schools. the way you get on this role if you have not paid our taxes for over 5 years state law requires the tax collector to sell those properties to return those properties to the tax role and also, if the taxpayer defaults on a property over 5 years. most of those are vacant lots and 5 hundred and 19 that are in actually 4 different locati

it is has two different parcels there's a 4.4 acre and 4.8 in dpw jurisdiction were we you wanted thiso reflect the shadow that impacts the land. since prop k analyze that on rp d property and not dpw property how have they were included in our packet and the recommendation to shift it but didn't alter the overall recommendations. i have my colleague here to talk about the details. good morning. i'm are the planning department staff. very briefly the katrero has many dwelling unit and commercial spates within a 9 story this located on 16 and 17 street between it's mid block. the project lies east of franklin square. give the difference in grade alone along katrero boulevard franklin square is thirty degrees above the sidewalk level of the project. the next steps would be going before the planning commission in the coming months once the recommendations have been made. that concludes my presentation >> thank you. >> on the analysis and show you some images of the showed from the proposed project. first we have the qualify active analyze it the shadow occurs between 10 o'clock and after

into a long-term document so right now for example, we're negotiating a 2k3wr0u7d lease for the x a parcel it encompass the tax credit and a ground lease for the rest of the infrastructure that's part of the phase 2 b as we move through feasibility anticipate sub ground leases so we'll peel off parcels as we are going to build the affordable unit and as block 8 there will be discussions about the ownership >> is that sold-out right. >> that would subsidize the rest of the project. >> but it would subsidize the 2 hundred and 60 some unit. >> that's correct. >> thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> i appreciate commissioner borden asking some of the questions when we think of this project. i want to take a positive stand and i really have to say i'm proud of the project and those are the reasons removing a project that's less than institutional is barely something that takes the former i might be using the wrong word barracks moving into to a real neighborhood in terms of housing diversity and religions to a larger sense of community which is really the dna of san francisco that makes the cit

and i have attached the map so that you can see the salmon colored parcels that we are referring to, and there are 16 in all. >> so, making the same pdr uses function better is going to be a revision to 204.3 of the planning code to the shared retail space and we know that we need new pdr construction in san francisco and this will allow us to cross subsidize by the high paying uses such as office to support the new construction and also make the small enterprise workplaces known as sew's more attractive to build. >> current controls on them, don't meet the sweet spot for the manufacturers that we are finding currently and we are finding the small enterprise workforce controls or the 100 percent of the spaces as most commonly referred to would allow the units to be 1500 square feet or less. and again, it will make it easier for new pdr users to get permit and we would revise, 226, changing the status of certain uses from conditional to permitted and generally this is the most common with the food-related uses the current process requires them to get a cu, or a conditional permit, whi

legislation maybe an uncodified section not in the code which makes a su d but list the specific parcels. that's a long way thing there's also several other changes that are coming forward it's premulch we had this hearing after the packet was delivered and the small business commissions next monday so by the time we're come back to you on the 17 you'll have more information to take care of the concerns that the staff and the mayor's office thinks forwards the golds >> and you'll include maps. >> we'll include maps. >> commissioner sugaya. >> i have a followup on that. i think it would help to also have a some data that shows for those parcels what the development potential is for office space >> sure. >> he the resulting amount of net p dr to give us the magnitude of this whether it's one hundred thousand square feet or a million whatever. so if we could get that. and, secondly, i think mr. cohn's comment is how can you assure that once the offices are built that any kind of p dr is actually, you know, going to populate that space and how it is subsidy that word we're using going to be

you're correct the city doesn't necessarily own the parcels in question and director meddling appointed the land is not caltrain but we haven't done a full investigation of the freeway corridor and there's probably still more work to be done on the railway yards themselves but should those projects be undertaken there would be have to be within win situations certainly not in the interest of caltrain's to make contracts without a gain certainly the underlying prosperity owner will have to gain as well. we'll look at the ownership stakes and what is what the pie is to be digest up and well past the end of this study we'll start to answer those questions that will carry on for some time and hopefully, people will see the gain >> part of the answer the extent those go from under freeway parcels and the development the city can capture some value sdlo through property tax and the mechanism we normally capture. the city doesn't have to own it to capture the value mostly of our land use plans have created the fund for other improvement >> i was hoping i could talk about the proper. >> there's

it is part and parcel to solomon northrup talking about his life from that perspective.avis: i want to pick another word and get you to juxtapose whether it is excitement or disappointment that it has taken you foreigners -- you people from the other side of the pond to educate the rest of us, to bring to us a story that has been met with this kind of response. >> i just don't think it is -- i in the yearas born -- i never thought of slavery. i have encountered the idea of slavery ever since i had consciousness, but i never thought of myself as outside of that experience. i never thought of myself as part of a different -- thisis was not taught -- was taught in british schools. >> it wasn't taught in detail. my family is from nigeria where hundreds of thousands of slaves, especially eastern nigeria, hundreds of thousands of people were taken to america, to the west indies. i remember speaking to people telling me about the extra bolts used in some of the underground places for the ebos. my history is completely connected to that history. anybody in the african diaspora h

policy to make the p dr space for affordable for jobs in san francisco and the best use of those parcels that be under developed in san francisco we're going to work with strrltdz so each of the people that this effects are at the table and a looking forward to progressing some of the things that are causing problems and looking forward to working with the community and making sure this piece of legislation goes forward. thank you >thanks. i'm launch into the legislation to create space for p dr spaces and make it easier inform p dr spaces available. so let's speak to the creating more spaces so far the p dr businesses. there's a lot of demand and the distribution and repair the p dr tracks with the economy the businesses are doing well. in the production development it is growing. adding any high paying jobs without having to have a four-year degree. p dr can't command enough in rent so they need supplements. we have affordable housing and transportation that needs to be relied on. we created two new work spaces both of which relied on p dr spaces speaker we recognize this wouldn't prov

as you can see, it's across the street and removed one parcel, and this is the hotel. so, for the last 45 years or so, these two have been tied together. the only thing that surprised me when the stanford court asked me about this was that they didn't do it 20 years ago. but we're asking today is to sever the two, allow the garage to continue as a community garage and the stanford court will go on its own. ~ what with parking selling cars and its port [speaker not understood]. i'm available to answer questions if you have any. as did you hear, by the way, the last two hotels to be approved were 94 2 mission and 250 port street and neither of them had any parking requirement. thank you. >> public comment if there is any? seeing none, public comment is closed. one question. so, does stanford court own the garage or that's separate ownership that there was an agreement between the two? >> sorry. stanford, the stanford court ownership has always owned the garage. there have been changes in owners of the two buildings, but they remain owned by the same entity. >> and what a

resulting in more a finished building sort of feeling similar to the pattern of a smaller parcel development typical of san francisco. >> i'm daniel i'm going to talk about more in depth about the site plan. so as you can see here as paulette was saying there's a centralized organized idea of the courtyards for the resident and it's meant to be an in what capacity to the neighborhood and in many ways as your circulating through it you get views of it into the court yard. they were specific about having building front most of the street 75 percent of the street had to have building on it but we have glimpse into the courtyard it's extremely challenging there's 60 feet of elevation. so this is an entry a view from fairfax looking at sort of into one of the court yards through the entry. although this is one building our two offices designed look distinctive. another thing we've worked hard on the housing authority is concerned about repeating the earlier housing development we made sure that the corridor was opened and have a spectacular view. on the town how did sites we were rather concerned

so as well as reevaluating the adjacent are parcels of the parcels that will be available for the other components and understanding new revenue and value capture. i wanted to point out that everybody is looking for revenue stream for caltrain and some of the other important infrastructure into the area and this potentially could provide that. as mentioned the first two benefits previously but the other four benefits and various other benefits associated but the 4 on here the generating of revenue and other capital ongoing revenues and generating additional ridership and helping with the san francisco housing need allocations and other priority areas and helping to provide for the sea level rise. the anticipated scope of work is quite simple for the component 5 it's understanding the potential land use scenarios and specific to the zoning work. this work allows the land opportunity in the areas. as with good studies there's public involvement we're looking at the potential of 8 focus meetings we'll have an advisory committees so we'll have a technical advisory committee and they'll obey

. >> items 29 is an ordinance to amend the general plan regarding adjacent parcels in the market area. i'm 30 is the ordinance amend the planning /kwoed and zoning map for agent say parcels for clean up. >> same house same call? these are passed in the first reading. let's go to roll call. >> kim is first on roll call to introduce new items. she is -- thank you supervisor kim. supervisor march itime. supervisor mar. >> i have a few items. supervisor mar. >> i have a few items. i want to invite everyone to the bay view this tu

i think the church is a perfect example of the type of parcel we would like to support through the tdr program. it is both contiguous to the zone area and is also a nonprofit institution that serves such an important need in the tenderloin community. and i just want to note something that i really [speaker not understood] over christmas, the students actually do a free concert for any homeless residents to come to watch them sing and carol. and i think that's such a wonderful way for young people to learn how to give back at an early age. and again, it could be a project could be an amazing place. i wish more of our churches were able to did that. we have a limited amount of daytime drop-in centers for homeless residents in our city, the good will project is really one of the few churches i know of that opens its doors to everyone in the city. it's just really just an amazing resource and i want to appreciate all the work that you do and really fulfilling your mission through your church. so, again, want to move this forward with positive recommendation. >> okay. supervisor kim has mad

. >> items 29 is an ordinance to amend the general plan regarding adjacent parcels in the market area. i'm 30 is the ordinance amend the planning /kwoed and zoning map for agent say parcels for clean up. >> same house same call? these are passed in the first reading. let's go to roll call. >> kim is first on roll call to introduce new items. she is -- thank you supervisor kim. supervisor march itime. supervisor mar. >> i have a few items. supervisor mar. >> i have a few items. i want to invite everyone to the bay view this saturday to the ymca. this is the first of a number of events, but this is this saturday at 10:00 in the bay view. it's the result of years of work that reflects cooperation between many different neighborhoods and our core offices to come forward with a single piece of legislation that we'll be introducing at next meeting. i know how big soda ads and unhealthy drinks. in december the budget legislative analyst office on the impact of these harmful drinks, we learned that sugary drinks are costing san francisco citizens, at a minimum, $50 to 60 million a year, and t

. >> we're talking about parcel sea at hunter's point.der a massive cleanup for chemicals and radiation contamination to make way for a neighborhood to house 25,000 people by 2017. but corners they stay are being cut and health and safety are at risk. trucks full of dirt have begun moving tons of soil. the navy said any contaminated dirt has been cleaned for radioactive material. the workers say they're worried that recent shipments have been sent out without proper testing. >> they would go dig it up and load the trucks and take it out. it's not being tested. >> reporter: kevin jackson has worked on the site for three years. last night he brought his concerns to navy officials. >> reporter: but the investigative unit obtained the navy contract for this cleanup. the plan says soil excavated will be traps ported for radiological processing. it's a screening process workers insist is not happening. in this letter sent to the state health department, a worker says, project personnel are not monitored for exposure to radiation. the worker all

worth more than one thousand dollars are taxed the mother is people have to pay taxes for parcels which are worth more than one hundred and twenty euros. customs officials of three countries believe that they never approached provokes cross border show business commerce is based on the difference in prices and import standards of melrose russia and kazakhstan. the movie uses them as you move through it with you. when we see a huge flow of goods moving from regulated segments to e commerce saying that we cannot imagine the volume of trade. therefore in our opinion the restrictions that are being discussed will be a barrier against possible violations for example there are no such problems and all rooms. he was so good the carpets are now being manufactured and shipped in the new enterprise open in the special economic zone called on to stoke as a part of the industrialization now all of the aisle and put on our two new brands that will make some context and carpets well known the project is implemented in four phases awesome with the substance of his egg. who would use local raw material

is absolutely part and parcel of all of this. so it's not just one part of the government but we can learn a great deal, i think, from the private sector, come up with a better, workable product, hopefully for a better price but also as i said, save taxpayers a great deal of money, an important area. >> finally, we taped an interview on this program with the head of icam, the internet board. and he talked about -- he's pushing for a loosening of the u.s. stewardship of the internet and making it a more international stakeholder management board. do you have any initial thoughts -- thoughts on that? >> i don't know what the specifics are in terms of that principle that he has put out there so i can't do a deep dive on it. the k that we know, as country that moatered this, that gave birth to it and how it has operated, that i certainly have a vision of how that needs to be retained. but i'm always open to robust kids of how to improve that. as long as it's not diminished. as long as it's not diminished. and many countries around th

now more and more you will hear about their work as they become my partners in so many of the other parcelsof land that are publically owned that have waited very patiently for these opportunities where investment in the private sector can match the government and public investments that we've done. when these buildings open you are going to see a lot of happy people. i know we are looking at a dirt pile today, but just look beyond that pile in all different directions and you will see the most beautiful housing and spaces and parks and we are figuring out the way to manage these with the investments that everybody is making. as you can tell, i'm very positive about local economy and positive about relationships and i want to say congratulations to the gallup family and merchant housing and everybody involved. these have been projects that have been years in the making. i think supervisor kim and i know how lucky we are that right now the investor confidence shows itself up in the brick and mortar and the jobs that we have. thank you very much for being here and being part of this success i

nice to visit with you. >> arrests and charges filed by a couple killed by a parcel bomb. their son-in-law is in custody, police say he planted an explosive package at his in-laws home. >> it is an ongoing having, but we feel like we have the single person responsible for committing this crime in custody. >> he lived behind the victim's house. one died monday, the other two days later. both in their 70s. a complex court case in ohio. an aimish couple is at odds with the state regarding medical conditions for their daughter. the parents pulled her out of cancer treatment, making the decision because they believed the treatment was killing her. the hospital went to court, trying to force the family to condition chemotherapy. the parents want to take the case to the ohio supreme court. joining us to talk about the case is maurice thompson, the attorney for the hershbergers, the parents. good to see you. thank you for joining us. >> sure thing. >> is it simply that the parents just didn't believe the doctors and didn't believe the hospital? >> well, there's certainly a trust f

it will be one of the highest points for parcel a and from the common area balcony the top floor residents will have really great view. this is the corner of fidel and gerald. [speaker not understood] breaks in building mass and materials and color. the last elevation i want to show you shows the side of the building that faces the existing morgan heights neighborhood. as i mentioned before, commissioners approved the schematic designs last october on october 15th to be specific, but then i pointed out we would be coming back for the series of legal documents. so, today i want to request the commission to approve a conveyance agreement that will allow for the transfer of the block 49 site from the north to the agency, a vertical lease position development agreement that describes mka development rights and obligations and an option to ground lease, which hold the basic terms of a future ground lease for the side. a family of these documents was also presented to cuc at the february 10th full cac meeting and they recommend that we move forward. after today's commission presentation of the a