you are right, the parcel shouldn't be in here they can a the map and pull the parcel out. >> the urban watershed assessment is online? it feels like that would be an important document four residents to be able to look at. they are in the watershed, for example. >> the urban watershed assessment information attained in all you have the features, the curbs and the areas and the slopes and all of that stuff have been placed into the model -- into the model so that it knows all you have this information? that was what i was saying. based off that information and effort we went through to do that assessment, we incorporate in the model. >> i understand. i did two things. i went to the website as we were talking and i didn't see the urban watershed assessment. that is the first thing to look at to see if my house is in the urban watershed. then i went to sf water.org you and that link didn't work either. it iit is important for resideno have a first step to go to online or two steps which would be the assessment and floodway site like me to be my house on the map? so the watershed assessmen

just to give you a parcel background.he parcel developer is heinz urban pacific and goldman sachs. it's the same developer as block 4. the purchase of parcel f was conditioned upon the developer obtaining an option to purchase block 4. parcel f is now in the approval process, with planning. it consists of 170 residential units, a hotel and office. ocii has approval rights over the parcel f residential component. due to the high homeowners association fees planned for parcel f, it is the developers' intent to off site the inclusionary housing units to block 4. the transbay redevelopment plan does not allow off siding of inclusionary unit so this will require a variation to the transbay development controls, which must be approved by the commission in the future. the ocii commission approved the block 4 option back in 2016. the term of the option expires in october of 2018. the land purchase price is $45 million subject to negotiations or appraisal based on the final terms of the deal. the option requires the developer to p

it's still again in parcel a, but it's a lengthy process, so we want to start the process. and then, the next two items, marketing outcomes, and we have sam simms here to speak to those. [inaudible] >> but this was ownership -- a home ownership program, and that was impressive, that we had two c.o.p. holders, and it's out of the nine inclusionary units within the building. also, 51, 52 innes. it's for sale, and we don't want to see fore sale units very often. if you have any other questions, we're available to respond. we now have an extensive marketing outreach program, and you can see that in the staff materials that's provided. so if you have any additional questions, we can answer them, as well. >> great, thank you. commissioner rosales? >> yes, thank you, vice chair bustos. i do have a couple questions for pam. this was excited, i have to say. you know, when i'm reading this, i'm very touched by the fact that our efforts are incrementally making a different in people's life. i want to commend everybody, not only the staff but the city in achieving these results. the pa

and in the third parcel, we just started talking to affordable housing developers. we will continue the outreach process. not sure if we will do a formal r.f.p. but we will solicit proposals from a number of different affordable housing providers. >> i would just say these things for the public record, urged that there are developers that are bayview district tenant based. they are the smaller of our community of affordable housing developers. sometimes because of that, they are not afforded the opportunity to do public partnerships that are not done to a former -- formal r.f.p. process. i want to encourage you to look to those developers and see those who are in district tenant bayview based that have partnered with other folks to make sure the community is respected in your project. >> one hundred%. i agree with you. we have begun talking to one such local developer about a possibility there. >> great presentation. i bet you feel like you are home in the old days. having you here is great. you are eloquent and you make it so simple. it is really amazing to me, thi

at at says that build would be developed approximately 29.26 acres of privately and publicly owned parcels. maybe i just need to better understand how that is broken apart. and if it is just parks on their portion, that is fine. >> they will be building parks on their land and dedicating it to the city at no cost. >> supervisor tang: ok. a great. >> since you are bringing up some housing issues, which i think are global and extendable beyond this project, i was going to say a couple of words about our thinking in terms of getting back to the housing package. you will see a similar thinking coming to some of the future projects coming towards you. as you know we are getting into projects that we will be bringing it that are mostly private, and somewhat some office to continue to -- contribute to jobs. this one will not. we are having to be more conservative with her out jewish -- with our asks. and we did run numbers and look at the project performance and where we are with this project is at about a 5.2% return on cost. our experts tell us that at 5.5% and above you will get capital to bui

the expectation is to have those parcels would be ownership at 50 units and the third parcel would be a 100% affordable rental property at 130 units. >> supervisor tang: what is the percentage of two and three-bedroom units required in the affordable and in the market rate? >> the percentage -- i'm sorry the percentage of the number of units? >> supervisor tang: two and three budget -- two and three bedroom units. >> is a 25% for the two bedroom -- i'm sorry. what? >> supervisor tang: i could not find this on the d.a., as well. >> i can't remember. the number of two and three bedrooms. >> supervisor tang: about 35% of units are two and three bedrooms. and the affordable and the market right? >> they will have to match. >> supervisor tang: about 35%. can you give me an accurate number? >> there is about a split. >> supervisor tang: ok great. if we can confirm, that would be great. i feel very uncomfortable with this very flexible open menu of affordable housing. i do think they percentage is quite high, to be honest, particularly given the district that this development is going into a

and the second amendment on the duplicated file is also on page 6, any parcel over 15,000 square feet in size that contains surface parking lot use, structures accessory to parking lot use in a building that doesn't exceed 800 square feet in the building area. as a reminder, colleagues, this is an ordinance that will allow us to strike a balance teen preserving light industrial and art uses in the south of market while also providing additional opportunities to provide 100% affordable housing. this ordinance permits 100% affordable housing on these sali lots. and adds this permitted use on 24 unidentified parcels undeveloped in the sali district which under existing law is not permitted. parcels under developed and contain no existing structures as well as existing parking lots with no existing buildings and we want to clarify because they could include guard stations, kiosks and even building signs so we wanted to clarify that in the ordinance. >> president m. cohen: supervisor, for what reason are you making the request to duplicate the file? >> supervisor j. kim: unfortunately, the

whatever the prevailing market rent in district ten is, there can be no units on this parcel that are renting for more than 80% of that number. that is all the units in district ten his. >> supervisor kim: what is that number currently? >> i don't know if we know it his. >> supervisor kim: that is a very scary number for us to go by. we are not actually looking at what people make in the neighborhood. there is confusion in the back and forth with president cohen. it seems like we were talking about the average a.m.i. in the district and now you're telling me is the average market rate of rent which is based on what landlords are charging. >> no no no. it is the average rent. that includes all the rent-controlled rents. am i getting this right? his. >> supervisor kim: that is still a very scary number. that is not based on need to be based on what units are going for on the market which are high and unaffordable for residents. mi misunderstanding? >> i apologize. there is an important distinction. let me read the document his. >> supervisor kim: and can i hear someone say -- >> it is f

and we have a parcel q. at the corner of harrison and second street that is used for phase two is subsequently affordable housing. myself and the director safai met with caltrans last month for the relinquishment of these parkests and they have provided a very good path on how to direct these parcels. given sufficient time to prepare for the final use of the parcels. i'd like to thank caltrans for their flexibility, understanding and cooperation. and helping us with this expedited process. they've been a great partner in this process. so, thank you. >> thank you very much. moving on to phase two of the downtown extension. the board approved a proposition allocation in the amount of $9.7 million for the downtown extension project for the 30% design effort. and $7 million only covers a portion of the funding needed, and we will be requesting the remaining funding from m.t.c. early next year when the regional measure three funds become director. i'd like to thank the director and her staff for the continued sup

this proposed district covers 100 whole or partial blocks and has 27 parcels in it. the district budget is $3.8 million and the plurality is covered by public parcels owned by san francisco unified, the city and county of san francisco or the state of california and other public agencies. it comes out to over 11% of the budget coming from public agencies. this means that the 30% threshold that is required to reach the special election, actually the facto becomes 41% as they cannot typically pursue that 11% from public agencies. the 30% threshold is over $1.1 million, which is well over the assessment budget of many of our c.b.d.s. based off our current process, our current knowledge of the process, the district currently has 22% of the weighted assessments in support of the going forward with a special election. if the committee moves this item forward, this would put the committee right, the steering committee for the organization in good graces to meet that 30% threshold, hopefully by the end of the month. are there any questions for staff? >> seeing no questions f

and parcel of american life. and parcel of american life. we wanted to begin our exhibit by exploring the phenomenon that is familiar, but striking. it is a phenomenon that is unique to the united states. there is no other country in the world that is so fixated that it is constantly creating images of those people. in the united states, this started before the country was even founded. it started with the countries most ardent patriots. there is something else that a significant about the phenomenon in this country. although imagery of american indians is pervasive with american life, it does nothing to bring non-natives closer or to understand the nature of the history of they had shared with american indians. this actually masks who native americans really are. we open this curtain and he looks what stands behind this imagery. this imagery is the intersection between native and non-native. the american exhibit ends with a very clear presentation of the fact that non-native americans and native americans share

is one parcel. it is one l-shaped lot. i will refer to tim on the other preservation questions, but there is no specific dimension. there is no setback requirement of certain amount of feet. >> vice-president swig: so the reason for my question is, if i am a real estate speculator, and i'm not accusing mr emerson of being a speculator, but if you build another house on bear and now you want to buy just bifurcate that tongue from the rest of the property, now you have a separate parcel and you have something that has been separated for sale which could be quite valuable. what are the restrictions? are there any restrictions related to buy for casing the property and creating a separate for-sale building which this building might be? >> the variance required to subdivide the lots because the tongue portion that this building will be built on we didn't meet the minimum requirements of the planning code for that area. >> vice-president swig: final question. it is an extraordinary block. i drove by and i also went on google ear

of affordable housing on these parcels. with the western soma plan changes, we took out affordable housing as a permitable use. this legislation will reinstate the use of only 100% affordable housing on sali lots where there is no existing development or habitable buildings, meaning that we won't be displacing any recogn organizations who brought this item forward. >> president cohen: thank you. supervisor brown? >> ms. brown: y >> yes. thank you. i just wanted to thank supervisor kim and tipping point and all the others who were involved in this. i really think we as a city need to look creatively on how to build housing on under utilized sites, and i think we need to look hard at establishing rules and regulations to find every opportunity to building housing. i'm committed to do this in my district, which i hope everyone else is, also. in my last job at oewd joint development, i looked at opportunity sites, private and public to build affordable housing, and i feel it's just really important. i think city sites should be

department of public health says this marker was found last friday, discovered on the northside of parcel 1a, undeveloped area behind a fence under less than a fat of soil. >> it's been clear -- fat of soil. it's been clear we were duped and corporate agreed overtook the safety of the people who chose to move out here based on a dream. >> reporter: deck barkers were used to light up the naval base at night. the radium contained glow in the dark paint. made up of a radio active substance that causes bone cancer. this family is stuck after buying a home in 2016. >> we don't have a plan right now. as a parent or a future parent you feel out of control of the situation because you want the best for your child. he is not even here yet and i feel like we have dope him a disservice. >> reporter: they are part of a lawsuit. former employees -- [technical difficulties] [no audio] >> the navy has not commented on this finding so far. the public health says 90% of parcel a has been scanned for radio active material. >> is the health department, is it admitting people on hunters point have been expos

>> so this is a parcel tax, although it's the most progressive parcel tax oakland has ever put on the ballot. >> how so? >> it has large exemptions for low income homeowners, for seniors, for affordable housing. so this is only paid for by property owners who arguably can afford it. and it has a great return on investment. quality preschool gets every kid off to a great start so they can fully achieve their potential through the power of education. and it uses what is proven successful models of a cradle- to-career approach to really increase high school and college graduation and not just four-year college. two-year college, trade schools, we want kids to be prepared for a variety of careers that will set them on a path of success. >> so all the money that's raised, how is it going to be spent? >> two-thirds of it will go for high quality preschool. and with a priority for low income 4-year-olds, but potentially it could serve all children down to 0 years old. and then one-third will go for a cradle-to-career comprehensive approach to increase high school and college graduation. >> t

it was a level of acceptance, it became part and parcel of life at lagarie.ety has gone from strength to strength. the queen herself paid tribute to the charity during its 175th anniversary celebrations at its base in southampton. what do they have to say about what we‘ve found? so, the cameras are rolling... 0k. ..if that‘s all right. does your charity accept full and unequivocal responsibility for the abuse that took place at lagarie? well, let — let me first say that — that i was horrified when i heard these accounts. we do regret that any abuse happened, and we have apologised unreservedly that this abuse happened. does your charity take full responsibility for the abuse that took place? i think we have to take some responsibility. i think we, in asking the police to reinvestigate this situation, that‘s our role in taking responsibility. the sailors‘ society was aware of allegations about lagarie as early as 2001. did your charity uncover the full extent of the abuse when it did its investigation in 2001? not necessarily in 2001, but in 2003—4, we were aw

you are talking about a small parcel of heroin fetching thousands and thousands of pounds.0, £500. the chance of detection is slight because they cannot search prison officers coming in, well, they cannot search them coming in en masse because it would disrupt the whole day. the temptation is huge and you have got a lot of young, inexperienced prison staff and the temptations are huge. the prison service said the figures reflect the actions of a tiny minority. would you agree with that? yes, without a doubt. most prisoners are customers if you like. it is a small minority of people who are professional criminals and professional drug dealers outside and they carry on when they get inside. it is a multi—million pound industry. just to clarify, i was saying the prison service reflect a tiny minority being the prison officers? without a doubt. the vast majority of prison officers are straight, but it does not take many. how do the authorities try to stem this tide of contraband that is going into prisons? should prison governors be doing more? i don't see what they can do with

law says you shouldn't not know china under the payson lot you say that we we are a part a part and parcel of the of the people's republic of china under the best you know it all should she has free speech and for in your freedom of association most which has a limitation that is decided by china must obey in a compiler's with a basic law and respect one country two systems and you should not see any movement for independence in or makes you so afraid of it is it because china is breathing down your it is not there it is that her off while you say almost nobody supports independence in hong kong you know this as well as i do we have a woman one point four billion nation next will not challenge and a lot of merit here a diverse people in her own cars about white and who are more independent you should not do something unlawful and use a lot of something one is not about how many people support your idea. it isn't i mean i'm really surprised about this because you know you're in your polity are simply not prepared to fight for what's been agreed in the basic law you just what about freedom o