the party. we must not grow complacently and rest on our laurels just because the ruling party enjoys great popularity among russian voters. still, it is a very impressive outcome. most political parties in the majority of countries around the world would be quite happy with such results. we certainly very much. we've discussed this with my colleagues with presidents who helped our party during the campaign with as head of states. he was really key to our success. so the results are fine, but it doesn't mean that we can rest on our laurels. russians are happy about everything. that is not the case. the elections are always about trust that you will be able to deliver going forward. it is an acid test on where we have been doing well and not say, well, it reveals the concerns of our people that should be addressed in our agenda. and those we've largely resolved. what are united russia, the goals for the next term? and as you know, what are the priorities, how have they changed if at all it's been

one man and one party are ahead.f sholz and his social democrats believe they should form the next government. >> the election made three parties stronger. these tee parties should also lead the next government. ros: it might not be that simple. it was a bad night for the c.d.u., merkel's party but it was still a close second and aftermini laschet refuses to con seemed defeat. we still don't know what kind of government will emerge even though we have a result. neither of these two parties can form a government on their own. they're going to have to talk to all the smaller parties and do a lot of negotiating. >> and in london, nasa lawrence a satellite. the satellite will enable. solomon:tists to continue to observe how human activity is changing the environment. ♪ a warm welcome to this special edition of "outside source." lots more on the falsea rocket soon. first, let's go to berlin. ros atkins is there. he's been monitoring the german election and it is so tight. ros: it is tight. it is the evening after the nigh

one man and one party are ahead.f sholz and his social democrats believe they should form the next government. >> the election made three parties stronger. these three parties should also lead the next government. ros: it might not be that simple. it was a bad night forhe c.d.u., merkel's party but it was still a close second and aftermini laschet refuses to con seemed defeat. we still don't know what kind of government will emerge even though we have a result. neither of these two parties can form a government on their own. they're going to have to talk to all the smaller parties and do a lot of negotiating. >> and in london, nasa lawrence a satellite. the satellite willnable. solomon:tists to continue to observe how human activity is changing the environment. ♪ a warm welcome to this special edition of "outside source." lots more on the falsea rocket soon. first, let's go to berlin. ros atkins is there. he's been monitoring the german election and it is so tight. ros: it is tight. it is the evening after the night

the republican party takes its coloration, as both parties do, from their presidential nominees. and until the republican party cides that it's going to take a different kind of nominee, it will not have a different coloration. don't think that mr. trump is forever. mr. trump is an entertainer, and, in my judgment, he's worked one pedal on the organ quite enough, and i'm not sure there's another pedal there for him. and what i think the republican party needs to do is get back to the idea that if you're going to have freedom and a creative society you need limited government. and if you're going to have limited government, you need to have an engaged judiciary. >> when you say trump is not forever, i certainly would like that to be true. there are many reform republicans who would like that to be true. but there's no evidence that that's true. in fact, there's increasing evidence that his hold on the party is as strong as ever and that he continues to intend to be as influential as ever within the context of republican primary politics and republican congressional politics and pe

party.o you think his resignation is7 symbolic do you think his resignation is? 's people like rebecca long bailey made a contribution to the fact that he's gone. what does that say? it contribution to the fact that he's gone. what does that say? it says that he doesn't _ gone. what does that say? it says that he doesn't want _ gone. what does that say? it says that he doesn't want to _ gone. what does that say? it says that he doesn't want to involve i that he doesn't want to involve people — that he doesn't want to involve people who were involved in the previous — people who were involved in the previous regime. that's undermining the unity— previous regime. that's undermining the unity committed to. i think it's pursuing _ the unity committed to. i think it's pursuing a — the unity committed to. i think it's pursuing a bit of a factional agenda _ pursuing a bit of a factional agenda. it's yet more of his ten pledges — agenda. it's yet more of his ten pledges that are being bent, and i de

is the republican party viable without donald trump? yes, the party...se i think he's the leader of the party. i think he was a good president from a conservative point of view. and do you think he lost the election or not? yeah, i think he lost the election. because he doesn't. so what does that tell you? no, he definitely lost the election. but he says it was stolen. continues to say it was stolen. how many politicians have said, "i was ripped off, "the election was stolen." but this is about democracy. the guy doesn't accept the democratic verdict... hillary clinton didn't accept the election. the bottom line... i'm sorry, there's no comparison. donald trump sits in mar—a—lago and says this election was rigged, it was stolen... he believes that. ..and thatjoe biden is not the legitimate president. he believes that. i don't believe that. i don't think it was stolen. so why is he the leader? why do you say he's the leader of our party then? because the policies he enacted worked. see, most people are not going to judge 2022 by what trump said. they're g

party. both these political forces are seen to be close to the royal palace and morocco, where the king still retains the vast majority of power. but the biggest headline of thursday's results is the resulting defeat suffered by the justice and development party, which had won the last 2 elections in 20112015. the p j. d. so it's parliamentary, shared, diminished from $125.00 seats to a mere 12 with its leader, american prime minister sided the north money failing to be elected within hours of the results of the money. and the entire leadership of the party announced their resignations to the general secretariat, takes full responsibility for the parties failure. and based on this, the entire secretariat headed and led by sod, a dean of money announced their resignation. effective immediately. once these volt was the 1st time and you look for law was implemented from the outset, the estimate party had complained that the law was unfair, claiming it was only introduced to reduce its candidate

party-— the left party.he european union, it needs to be done collectively, germany do this on his own. germany isn't doinu germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it — germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it on _ germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it on its _ germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it on its own. _ germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it on its own. we _ germany do this on his own. germany isn't doing it on its own. we just - isn't doing it on its own. wejust have a clear agenda that we can't leave the coal until 2030. and where the only party together with a laugh that say so. we see that both these parties, they deny that we can do it and most players in the industries demand that german legislation to create the respective political frameworks to make it possible. it's actually not the tasks of climate activist or the industry to make german politics climate neutral but thatis german politics climate neutral but that is what we see at th

left party, small— party and that and that would be the liberal left party, small tax, - party and thatberal left party, small tax, low spending, so that would be i liberal left party, small tax, low spending, so that would be a i spending, so that would be a difficult — spending, so that would be a difficult combination, - spending, so that would be a difficult combination, not i difficult combination, not impossible _ difficult combination, not impossible but _ difficult combination, not impossible but difficult, i difficult combination, not i impossible but difficult, so definitely— impossible but difficult, so definitely looking - impossible but difficult, so definitely looking at - impossible but difficult, so definitely looking at quite. impossible but difficult, so - definitely looking at quite tricky coalition— definitely looking at quite tricky coalition negotiations _ definitely looking at quite tricky coalition negotiations over- definitely looking at quite tricky coalition negotiations over the. definitely looking at quite tricky- coalition negotiations over the next few wee

the party. the 5 leaders we have chosen are well known, even popular individuals. they are very well known in the community. also those who come to cost that balance and care about the evolution of russians political system would like to see new faces by new faces. i don't necessarily mean and timing you never seen before, where they can be young and inexperienced. of course, it could be people who have never engaged in political battles. that's who we have on the ticket. with the exception of sag a show you who is closely connected with the party. in fact, it was he who helped create the party 20 years ago. so he is a well known figure among the party members and supported with more with for the future within the party. it's clear that most of them will stay in that professional field will continue working in their fields. one person's my colleague and that server will work in the state duma from now on. however, none of them are going to sever that ties with the policy. they will continue to m

after the summer of 2020, there could be no doubt which party is the party of law and order.e are the ones that said the border must be secured. we are the ones that stood up for police even when it wasn't popular. we said we could have a fair justice system and still keep the streets safe. criminal justice reform done with the police and the community, not a done to the police and the community. those goals are not and never have been for republicans. the hard truths, well told. it's republicans not democrats have turned the courts back to what the forefathers envisioned, interpreters, not makers of the law. this is far from finished but we made great progress. the judges understand the role getting civil parties and criminal defendants what they deserve, a fair hearing guided by the rule of law not by some political appointees preference or the legal moment, but another hard truth well told and so the question going forward is standing up to that i those that mislead for their own political game worth the risk i believe it always has been and always will be. easy, no, worth

"he does not represent my party". and you know what my party told me? go to hell. he won.les. no, i didn't abandon my principles. well, you thought the guy was a xenophobic bigot. i accepted the consequences of the election. in a democracy, i can take my ball and go home but the people in south carolina chose president trump. the people of america chose president trump. i've tried to help him where i could. so it's ok to help a guy who you believe is a racist bigot through four years of presidency? yes. it's ok for kamala harris to serve asjoe biden�*s vice president when she suggested he supported racist policies. if you know anything about democracy, when the election�*s over, if it doesn't end then you never have the ability to govern. so i understand the game being played here and what will i do? i will helpjoe biden where i can. i voted for the infrastructure bill. i'd like to help him more but it seems to be that we're on different planets, politically. if donald trump runs again i will support him. this debate isn't academic and about what happened in 2016... yeah,

she is from the party, from the labour party. do you want to from the party, from the labour party.. do you want to welcome her back? i would love _ party. do you want to welcome her back? i would love to _ party. do you want to welcome her back? i would love to have - party. do you want to welcome her back? i would love to have lucy i party. do you want to welcome her back? i would love to have lucy at| back? i would love to have lucy at the party- — back? i would love to have lucy at the party- she _ back? i would love to have lucy at the party. she said _ back? i would love to have lucy at the party. she said still— back? i would love to have lucy at the party. she said still a friend i the party. she said still a friend of mine. whether she would want to come back, you would have to ask her. d0 come back, you would have to ask her. , ., come back, you would have to ask her. ,, ~ ., i. come back, you would have to ask her. ~ ., ., her. do you know you got the labour party back? — her. do you know you got the labour party back? i — her. do you know you got the labour party back? i

the labour party is a party of working—class people and it did amazing things. people those things they didn't have before. what's interesting, talking to you about these things when you were on the front bench under ed miliband is arguably, whyjeremy corbyn left you on the back benches. there were people at that time who called you a red tory, suggesting you weren't welcome in the labour party. i find that very difficult. i find it very difficult because ijoined the labour party when i was 17. i've been in the labour party for 25 years now. i love the party and its history, and when people said that to me, it's like, it's my family. don't tell me i don't belong here. i found that very hard. afterjeremy corbyn became leader, to people shouting that at me, i find it very difficult. you look quite emotional just remembering that. yeah, i found it very difficult because i love the labour party and i've been delivering leaflets and knocking on doors for 25 years. people who in many cases have justjoined telling me that this wasn't my party. i guess they would say yo

this is exactly why we chose, have no party ideology, because if a party says ok, we're a party for the proletariat. it will only get the votes of those people who identify themselves or feel related to the prototype area and so on. for a party, for large businesses. it just doesn't work the same way anymore. used to in the early 20th century. still, where does united russia belong? on the political spectrum, but i would call it a conservative and central party. does any of the national guard? what do you think about the current state of competition and russian politics? critics say it is waning. the number of parties with a chance to run has shrunk by over 50 percent from 74 in 2016 to 32 in 2021. out of 47 parties that are no longer active, 43 were dissolved by the supreme court. not by themselves. do you see the problem here? nathan, dancing lets you know, its neither a problem know a particularly good thing, just to find them. i would like to remind you about the amendments introduced during my presidency for back in 2012 or allowed for more pets unit for political parties. prior to

parties. place on the political spectrum division into right and left wing political ideologies will still be there. but look how blurred these lines are between them and other countries. and today we no longer have a wide ideological gap between the platforms of various political parties in russia . the way it was back in the early 20th century, the again, it boils down to the methods each party chooses to achieve the results and the country needs. and there are significant differences helping united russia as motto goes. and it's true, by the way, is the party of real action. we do our best to deliver on everything we have put on paper. we want to set an example for others. of course, some things come out well, but sometimes we fail and people would criticize as harshly every time we do. but it's easy to monitor our performance anyway and see where we succeed and where we fail. at the same time, we understand that each party has its own base and it is important every punch to grow. it's as m

because beforehand you sound like 6 parties, high parties for parties. and it's very difficult to create some homogeneity within this kind of coalition. so i think there is a good chance that this is a quality that would happen. may think it's good for rockets, which for the big reforms that are, are present in the taking the pressure is going to be on this coalition though that isn't my normal pressure and expectation expectations are very high. and i think also that putting down the reform, especially with the service of social security in terms of employment in terms of regional kind of dynamic ation of the economy. all of these kinds of things like really reinforcing the role of the middle class. those are very high expectations and i think, but i think this governments with demand the political mandate and also with the people who are within the budget, i think they will be able to deliver just but you think these parties will be able to deliver and get the mandate from the king to, to deliver while the ladder. i think that this part of the coalitio

the to be hearing about from all parts of the party-— of the party.ries the story. it _ of the party. the daily express carries the story. it is - carries the story. it is interesting. this is the prime minister is pleased... 0nce interesting. this is the prime minister is pleased... once again it has that accurate of a churchill rallying cry, doesn't it? i’m has that accurate of a churchill rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure that those _ rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure that those who _ rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure that those who read _ rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure that those who read the - rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure that those who read the daily i rallying cry, doesn't it? i'm sure l that those who read the daily says will be moved but that's not the issue. the issue is that working people are going to be hit with a tax that is effectively designed so that rich pensioners can keep hold of the houses despite getting hundreds of thousand pounds worth of care we are all paying for. we can see why this is such a difficult sell. in

— look like the party of welfare, other party of? that is what i was bein: other party of?f in _ other party of? that is what i was being accused of in the _ other party of? that is what i was j being accused of in the interview, labour had become a very narrow party and i wanted to say no, we are broader than that. but some things and the way i express them did cause her to people. i never meant to do that. the labour party is a party of ordinary people and it did amazing things like improving education, the health service and the welfare state, to give working—class people those things they didn't have before. ~ . , , those things they didn't have before. ~ ., , , ., ~ before. what is interesting talking to ou before. what is interesting talking to you about _ before. what is interesting talking to you about some _ before. what is interesting talking to you about some of _ before. what is interesting talking to you about some of the - before. what is interesting talking to you about some of the things i before. what is interesting talking l to you about some of the things

of course, _ parties. that is finished. of course, it— parties. that is finished.been thought that the man who hope to succeed angela merkel, _ man who hope to succeed angela merkel, who she kind of pushed forward — merkel, who she kind of pushed forward and as her preferred choice forward and as her preferred choice for chance — forward and as her preferred choice for chance layer from her party, that he — for chance layer from her party, that he would be a walk in, but absolutely not. he failed to persuade voters during the election campaign _ persuade voters during the election campaign on and it was always going to be a _ campaign on and it was always going to be a bit— campaign on and it was always going to be a bit of a risk for him, because if— to be a bit of a risk for him, because if we think about it, look at the _ because if we think about it, look at the last— because if we think about it, look at the last two elections, the majority— at the last two elections, the majority of voters for the conservatives were women. they liked angela _ conservatives we

they are not the leaders of this party. i won't| leaders of this party. narrative. we have a lot of younger people that are coming out. ., , ~' , , out. people like liz cheney is now excluded _ out. people like liz cheney is now excluded from _ out. people like liz cheney is now excluded from your i out. people like liz cheney is. now excluded from your party. she has decided there is no place in the party for donald trump. place in the party for donald trum -. . . . place in the party for donald trum-. . , , , trump. that is the litmus test ri . ht trump. that is the litmus test right now. _ trump. that is the litmus test right now. is _ trump. that is the litmus test right now, is it? _ trump. that is the litmus test right now, is it? in _ trump. that is the litmus test right now, is it? in my- trump. that is the litmus test right now, is it? in my view. right now, is it? in my view there is _ right now, is it? in my view there is a — right now, is it? in my view there is a place _ right now, is it? in my view there is a place in - right now, is it? in

s u party army lash. it was disappointed with early projection. spots vowed to do everything possible to build a conservative life. government dev i comes is for by the election campaign is finished. and this is now about one thing, a stable coalition for a strong and modern germany go to the chancellor will be the one to bring opposites together. develop a successful program for the coming for years will be there will be many intensive talks and cushions in the work being done with competitors in the next few days. because some of it there, the chancellor will have to develop a project that goes beyond the coming weeks and i am prepared for that task. so step of austin is falling all of this joined his line from a gentleman, capital berlin. so both the s p d and the cd you lead is claiming the right to form a government as we heard in those clips. first of all, how much of a blow is this? to the party of chancellor anglo marco that has really been a dominant force in german politics. this is a huge blow

and they say that political parties and head, the political parties, have been so focused on position and power, that they have forgotten their promise to the protest this and the civil and to let protests against perform a president i wanted. but she who demanded better economic conditions and better lifestyles behead of the sovereignty counsellor been for home. and his, that people have said that the belief political parties should be focusing on the needs of the people in trying to lead the country to credible elections and to democracy. so that is something that the political parties did not accept. they say that the military has no rights to these statements. so the tension have been climbing and has been mounting. and they have been demand by the food in the professional association for more protest on the 30th of september. so that people show that they support a civilian rule despite be, be lack of unity between the political parties. they say they want people to show the military that even though political parties may not seem like they're on the same page, they do not want t

described the signal part of his own party. he and his i part of his own party.d make it more efficient and electable. , ., and make it more efficient and electable. , . , and make it more efficient and electable— electable. they are 'ust being undemocratic. _ electable. they are 'ust being undemocratic. keir_ electable. they are just being undemocratic. keir starmer i electable. they are just being - undemocratic. keir starmer wanted to stand in the leadership election in clamping down on the democracy of the labour party, he could havejust said so and he didn't because if he did he would not have become leader of the labour party. and there is a problem in british politics which is politicians being dishonest. it is corrosive. in terms of attrition fees, borisjohnson, his serial lies, and keir starmer, to say one thing to get elected on to another, what message does that send to the electorate? it is not reforming the party and a good way, it is making it less democratic than the conservative party, the liberal democrats, and the snp. i think democracy is a goo

all parliamentary parties. talk about the need to return to the question of the retirement age, but they don't think about at what age a person has the right to retire. and we, the pensioners party, suggest people themselves should decide when to retire. at the same time, their pension should depend on time and employment. we've calculated that the most optimal time and employment to receive a worthy pension is 30 years back in the soviet union. it was 40 years. however, today, life expectancy in russia is not that high in comparison with european country. therefore, a person should live the rest of his or her life with dignity, not just surviving. so something else that the party of pensioners for justice wants to adopt is a so called social code, which it, which would ensure social benefits and payments for all age groups. so, being a young family would just have their 1st child or retired pensioners. now i can tell you that according to opinion polls currently, this is the most popular party among those whic

and i think parties as you want to see the next 2 mainly the inexperience, the green party candidate, were able to make it appear that the green parties somewhat ideologically connected to the left. maybe you can make stream left and therefore has been able to frame them within the narrative. so called slide to the far left, germany, sorry to interrupt you them because i do want to bring or recon here. i can see that you're agreeing and i'm curious about how this then pays out on an e use stage, because we're obviously looking at a potential coalition government. there's been a lot of speculation about who might actually constitute that government. and i mean, sholtes from the social democrats, even though it's the traditionally left policy, is really been trying to portray himself as more of the central character. did you think that all of this might change the way that germany engages with your? yes, so actually i'm not really agreeing with mona in the sense that i think that this idea of a possible flight to the left in germany is not completely out of the question. and so far as w

the king makers are going to be the smaller parties, the green parties. liberals like that, i mean, is this where the, the continuity and change meet. go ahead and frankfurt. well, 1st of all, to clarify what i meant in my 1st euro. i said that she never present a decision where she wants europe to guide. and if we compare it with science, was most likely the next chancellor sex when we formed the next generation you host damage recovery package. he called madison moment that the european union will finally be something like a union, as a stabilizing macroeconomic specter to make the monetary union more robust. you cannot make crisis. so that might be something that we will see happening in a lot, especially the net proceedings on a waiting for such a think. know that germany is not taking responsibility. being more away from what used to be the old song of therapy is key and we have to keep our budgets in order when it comes to he's also not so much about therapies. p rather wants to push germany to invest in on an annual basis to find the needs coming years. and his priority as the h

powers inside the party. and for many political choices, we felt for me personally, i being invest that trained opposition or wanting reform to be that then congress in 2016. so we have to admit today that we failed in, not changing anything or changing reforming this party. the 2nd is that the choice is taken by another party. political choices, especially we, we admit we were part of those choices because we were inside the party willy nilly . we assume some of these responsibilities. those choices have led to the scene we saw on july the 25th. and so now we're not though with the present image. the image you see in another is an isolated nada. another but can not really get involved in this movement. this a ferris's against the, the danger of dictatorship, which is coming very, very quickly. intern is yes. let's take a look at a couple of those reasons. firstly, have you given up on in the completely and have you destroyed any internal competition, any internal pressure that you could pull on president car

the social democrats are trying to win over the kingmaker, the greens and ftp party. -- fdp party ♪ >to all of you around the world, welcome. the results of germany's election are bringing into picture a politics dramatically changed. social democrats of merged in winter. the second place is the conservatives. they put in their worst ever election performance. the march and victory was only 1%. why both main parties argued that they could have a mandate to form the next government. let us go through the numbers. the spd took 26% of the vote. just over 24%. coming in third the greens with nearly 15% of the vote. the best result ever. almost guaranteeing them in any future government. the fdp also did well with 11.5%. -- will return to parliament and the socialist left will also retain seats in parliament despite a poor showing. this means that the fdp are sent to win seats in parliament and the greens and fdp are to take many seats. months of uncertainty as parties enter coalition talks. how we got to where we are tonight. >> after a tight race, the final result brought clarity. they s

so that will certainly be an issue with a much more fiscally conservative party, like the liberal party or the christian democratic union that also doesn't really have an appetite to a centralized, more macroeconomic competences. but one could expect something like this from the social democrats, depending on who will be the actual, your coalition partner. so i want to dig in a little more into the legacy that michael has left here when it comes to some of those policies because it really feels like her background of the scientist really made for more pragmatic policies. almost a kind of attempt to de poto rising policy. i mean, she, as you said, she defended the euro during the greek debt crisis. she supported that pandemic e recovery fund, which was really financed by common borrowing. she also, famously in 2015, kept germany as borders open. mon, i'm curious, how do you think germans regard that decision now? because that obviously came at a very heavy political price and really, essentially also led potentially to the rise of the right cleaning a se. so how the germans reflect upon

the 2 leading parties clearly are the liberal party, the conservative party, but then the in d p, the new democrat party. well, they have enough to be influential. they're, they're way ahead of the next party, which is a block cubic law, which probably won't be considered here. but i want to ask melissa, do you see perhaps the n d p coming in? as i think in 2001, 900 had this kind of role as perhaps being the king makers in the situation. yeah. and, you know, there's, there's a lot of anger towards the liberals for, you know, they divided indian affairs as it's called into 2 separate bureaucracies and enter 3 tons of money at best. and it sounds good and we love that show. but all the press conferences where the, all the money's announced, but the reality on the ground is nobody's seeing results for that such little results. the amount of money being spent versus the results being seen. i think canadians are frustrated. i think i know indigenous people are frustrated. where's the results and what's your plan? why would we give you a 30 when you haven't been able to make any headway ju

the 2nd ballot is where a political party, $47.00 of them vying for safe, but only parties who get more than 5 percent of the vote nationwide will end to parliament. the. okay, let's go live to correspondent in germany, pete oliver. good evening. we thought that was going to be interesting and judging by the exit polls is looking extremely close. do you think that one party stands a chance the former government single handedly? we bound to see lots of coalition conversations coming in the next few days. absolutely not. when it comes to one party forming a government by themselves, perhaps absolutely not when it comes to 2 parties forming a coalition, which is the usually the preferred option here in germany. in fact, that's what i'm going to merkel. the outgoing chancellor is presided over for the last 4 years. it is as tight as it possibly could be here in germany, that's going off the exit polls that have come out. it's putting those exit polls are putting you, pardon the social democrats slightly in the leads and in fact that is be represented by the various different party headquart

so the communist party of the russian federation is the 2nd largest party in russia, led by canada, a gun of old time leader. since the 900 ninety's. this is the biggest and oldest of russian communist parties. it's pledge to deliver modernized version of socialism, and it can only program includes the nationalization of the countries natural resources and also a strong support for small businesses. previous election was the full time in a row that there's party finished in 2nd place. we spoke to the leader about the gulf room. we have a huge outflow of capital that could have been stopped long ago. and we need to take certain measures is necessary to provide support the old branches of small and medium sized businesses and a short sustainable production. it is necessary to hold a referendum on the nationalization of raw mineral site. so most old countries do another party competing. the election is road and this is a right wing nationalist party and do for social justice and the preservation of traditional values. the policies demanding tougher immigration rules and lobbying for the

the party brett's it. the boss borg of each boat comes from lead vices and there isn't really any competition for that lead. but since module for raj, the game reps, your party now reform, you know, speaking of very much for at least 2 sides of the boat is still saying i going to go to the concert the father brackson still structures how people are going to boat so much just concerned there's a very considerable advantage. in contrast, remain, vote is still divided between the leg well to some degree than it would have cost. i didn't know the board r b s and b. so now the labor party is not only picking up the stay somewhat less than half of that remain on that for, and it's not being particularly successful despite its best endeavors. by, for the most part, i'm not talking about brackson is not succeeding in regaining the abroad. it's not actually vogis. so the legacy abraxas rich while bed is not in that law and you still very have any structuring part choice. i'm because on the remain side, if i was for

the republican party has now become the party of default. the party that says america doesn't pay its debts. our country is staring down the barrel of to totally republican manufacturer disasters. a government shut down and a 1st ever default on the national debt. the impacts of both would gravely harm every single american in this country. life does she have her times the joins us from washington, so she had the clock is ticking. bring us up to speed for us with what's been happening on the senate floor. you're right. the deadline if thursday evening, that's when the new fiscal year will the old fiscal year ends and the new fiscal year begins at midnight. and within this bill is structured with that there are 2 major issues that separate but fundamentally entwined barriers funding. the government for the next fiscal year from friday all was all the appropriations if, if this, if this bill doesn't pulse, they'll be no money to fund the government for the coming year. and there'll be another government shut down we've experienced before. that

united russia is the ruling parties. the largest policy in the country is germany, is the form of prime minister on form, the president dmitri mit votive party self support. the program of the current president among his goals is strengthening russian sovereignty. its economic agenda include support for domestic industry and it has an emphasis on the high tech sectors, as he's corresponding constantly, ross cough brings us more from united rushes headquarters. everyone here seems to be in high spirits and you're going to see the stage over my shoulder. we're one of the party leaders hasn't just congratulated the audience with a quote unquote clear victory. however, at this point, it doesn't look like beat, overwhelming victory as it was during the last election. we're looking at the preliminary result here that show united russia with a 38.5 percent of the vote. another exit poll suggests it's close to 45 percent, but anyway, it's a decrease. as of now it's a decrease from the last parliament re election in 2016 when the

first of the russian party of freedom and justice is among the socialist parties involved at pleasure to build a society based on social justice and equality for most free education. and hope can the 1st on this body's been involved in such an election and the chair told us why they deserve people's like what we sent for civil rights and freedoms, including people's rights to teach in their own languages and really practice their religion. and we aim to create a social state. we did not have the goal of establishing a left wing party. we are a wrote civil movement, and this is what makes us unique. there is no time to divide people into left and right. will continue with our dave dive into the 14 parties who are running for the state duma. let's take a quick look at those with an environmental agenda. the greens promote. so course conservation of nature this year, the party go this of a new chairman and continuous push to unite all. but if you care about ecology here in russia, the started as a social movement did. 993, seeking a so called green revolution. of all the one little less

party.between you _ democratic party. but there are big differences between you and i democratic party. but there are big differences between you and the i differences between you and the liberals. do you think it's realistic for you to form what you call a climate government with them in it? tt call a climate government with them in it? . ., , , ., call a climate government with them init? . ., i, ., ., in it? it will certainly be a tough negotiating _ in it? it will certainly be a tough negotiating process. _ in it? it will certainly be a tough negotiating process. that's i in it? it will certainly be a tough i negotiating process. that's obvious because they have this kind of voodoo ethanol makes. they don't want to raise taxes and they don't want to raise taxes and they don't want to raise taxes and they don't want to take on new debt, but we also have to make a lot of investments into our futures. be also have to make a lot of investments into ourfutures. be it public schools, be at the

after the summer of 2020 there could be no doubt which party is the party of law and order. we are the one who's said that our border must be secured. we're the ones who stood up for police even when it wasn't popular. we said we can have a fair justice system and still keep the streets safe. criminal justice reform done with the police and the community, not done to the police in the community. those goals are not in conflict and never have been for republicans. it's a hard truth well told. it's republicans, not democrats, who have turned the courts back to what our forefathers envisioned, interpreters, not makers of the law. now this job is far from finished, but we made great progress. rescuing the courts from judicial activists, appointing judges who understand the role, giving civil parties and criminal defendants what they deserve, a fair hearing guided by the rule of law, not by some political appointee's personal political preference. not the legal fan of the moment but the law. another hard truth well told. and so the question going forward is will standing up to th

party. what that means is that they are supporting the current geopolitical course of russia, but they want to see most spotlight on the environmental agenda on the green and gen after all. the other greens and it is a universal concept to universal political concept of course. so here's how the party chairman described and talked about the key builds that they're planning to introduce. if of course they get enough public support, you will not have about 10 legislative proposals dedicated to that. the 1st focuses on organic agriculture. we want to support our farmers, so they could stop using come food, chemicals. and that's very important. then we think it's important to impose greater fines and allow for other forms of legal action to make sure business owners and shareholders act responsibly. so again, everything from encouraging recycling to well terms of energy sources in russia, and with well bolstering that present here to even supporting and backing the russian science and encouragin