my worry is we have pdr space which drives pdr job jz everything else grows around it, we should try to preserve some pdr space because it keeps the employment stable. st. is decreasing, but if we eliminate pdr space that number will keep going down. i have a question and probably should have left you a e-mail in this. on page 16 if you could-- >>the rates of change on employment on land use type in the bottom hand. if you can do the first line if you don't mind? >> basically it says in 200530 percent the city jobs were office jobs. 2014, 31 percent. from 2005 to 14 office jobs grew by 34 percent and in the last year they grow by 7 percent. if you compare those to the overall growth, so office jobs grew much faster than jobs in general >> thank you very much because that illustrates a point where pdr jobs have fallen or gone up and everything else is exceeding >> we think pdr jobs are stabilizing. if you look at pdr jobs as a percent of total jobs it declined. it rises and fallwise the rest of the conomy but as a proportion of total kwraubs it is a long term decline and now we think

loss in the capacities go on and with that pdr loss we're seeing an enormous loss of community jobs and community of color disappearing and the widespread disappearance of artists a mass exodus those are exactly the kinds of spaces we need more housing our folks that the way out of scale not like a urban mixed use project either in the tint or in the paralysis application when i weigh the eastern neighborhoods actually overheard someone in the hallway this think an excellent test we'll repeat it a number of times i think that is exactly what they're looking for how far can we punish beyond the meaningful boundary thought mixed use to carve it up and spot zoning from true urban mixed use to will have entirely residential overall when i look at this project those look like the number 4 hundred and 8 thousand square feet of residential as opposed to to 10 thousand residential square feet let's relimousine it residential it is only a couple of good-sized rooms tacked up please don't let this grrd go forward it is not a reasonable proposal in its current form a huge amount of more protec

my worry is we have pdr space which drives pdr job jz everything else grows around it, we should try to preserve some pdr space because it keeps the employment stable. st. is decreasing, but if we eliminate pdr space that number will keep going down. i have a question and probably should have left you a e-mail in this. on page 16 if you could-- >>the rates of change on employment on land use type in the bottom hand. if you can do the first line if you don't mind? >> basically it says in 200530 percent the city jobs were office jobs. 2014, 31 percent. from 2005 to 14 office jobs grew by 34 percent and in the last year they grow by 7 percent. if you compare those to the overall growth, so office jobs grew much faster than jobs in general >> thank you very much because that illustrates a point where pdr jobs have fallen or gone up and everything else is exceeding >> we think pdr jobs are stabilizing. if you look at pdr jobs as a percent of total jobs it declined. it rises and fallwise the rest of the conomy but as a proportion of total kwraubs it is a long term decline and now we think

my worry is we have pdr space which drives pdr job jz everything else grows around it, we should try to preserve some pdr space because it keeps the employment stable. st. is decreasing, but if we eliminate pdr space that number will keep going down. i have a question and probably should have left you a e-mail in this. on page 16 if you could-- >>the rates of change on employment on land use type in the bottom hand. if you can do the first line if you don't mind? >> basically it says in 200530 percent the city jobs were office jobs. 2014, 31 percent. from 2005 to 14 office jobs grew by 34 percent and in the last year they grow by 7 percent. if you compare those to the overall growth, so office jobs grew much faster than jobs in general >> thank you very much because that illustrates a point where pdr jobs have fallen or gone up and everything else is exceeding >> we think pdr jobs are stabilizing. if you look at pdr jobs as a percent of total jobs it declined. it rises and fallwise the rest of the conomy but as a proportion of total kwraubs it is a long term decline and now we think

but my understanding the u m u you want to promote the pdrs and housing and mixed urban use there is a lot of provided on uber and so i think that concept every project to have both uses not something not analyzed sfierdz in the eastern neighborhoods and the other comment that was very important was that the present uses have been relocated within san francisco to 6000 third street which are the areas we want more pdrs lots of available space people with businesses that need to move products are much more interested in being in those areas their closer to the freeways and moving their product and lower rents and make sense to have the heavier pdrs use some of the smaller boutique pdr uses may be might fit by the way, that's my feeling and two and a half times the open space. >> i mind add some speakers providing more of the open space not a to be you know usable by the public i'll encourage that to work with staff to replace some of the muse with the paved areas and the public can sit rather than the paved areas that are so heavy planned you can't go to those areas on the gym situati

more pdr not having a lot of people coming and going as opposed to to the self-storage so given thatht process i think we felt this was appropriate to we can indefinite revisit it per you're suggestion or having that suggestion you know we're going to the central soma that is an avenue to which this could be definitely addressed in those terms. >> the city attorney wants to weigh in. >> kate establishing if the city attorney's office i'm not sure what commissioner moore you mean by value added when the city assesss an impact fee we're going to to study of impact of the project and to establish a nexus between the impact on the neighborhood are impact on the city as related to the particular kind of fee i'm not sure if the city has conducted a nexus study or shows the difference in impacts on any of the normal fees we collect if this was defined as a retail use now an office use without that study or without that nexus connection i don't think the commission could establish assess a fee on this project at this time unless staff can tells you that the nuking analysis has been done i wo

on displacement as old pdr as well if we talk in a percentage ratio we have a scenario where we see properties carve up and if we retain a level of pdr, the percentage of the actual building stock can start to get quite small given the size and development we are seeing. those are some the things my community would like to see investigated as wego forward and this time can help us talk about this more so ask that you please continue this proposal. thank you. >> my name is [inaudible] i'm a volunteer with the applauseey 16 coalition recollect a small business owner and a parent at a public spanish school and also in support of continuing the hearing on interim controls and also want to thank the planning department for this. i think it is a big step in the right direction and with a little more time we can get more support from the community, but that takes time. it needs to be dusiminated and translated into spanish but translated from planning jargon to regular english and then spanish and that takes time but think it is a step in the right direction and hope you will consider some

you have a magnificent pdr coming in very, very close to one hundred hooper the area is well served this is exactly in my mind thought of in the eastern neighborhoods when we wanted to increase and shape the residential and change because change is coming change the neighborhood it is going to start in potrero hill and dog patch thank you. >> as you're working your way up i'll call a couple of more names (calling names). >> game changer my name is scott the director of operations at live oak school ami i'd like to address the safety of our children in terms of traffic i believe that this study shows about 24 hundred more traffic or automobile trips through the area once that project is completed we don't think the traffic study as addressed this but should address the crossing lights and more signage and perhaps a crossing guard during rush hour when the kids are arriving at the school when traffic is to the east i'd like to address the air quality having classes and the children are around i'm concerned that once the project gets started the monitoring will not be accurate to insur

you have a magnificent pdr coming in very, very close to one hundred hooper the area is well served this is exactly in my mind thought of in the eastern neighborhoods when we wanted to increase and shape the residential and change because change is coming change the neighborhood it is going to start in potrero hill and dog patch thank you. >> as you're working your way up i'll call a couple of more names (calling names). >> game changer my name is scott the director of operations at live oak school ami i'd like to address the safety of our children in terms of traffic i believe that this study shows about 24 hundred more traffic or automobile trips through the area once that project is completed we don't think the traffic study as addressed this but should address the crossing lights and more signage and perhaps a crossing guard during rush hour when the kids are arriving at the school when traffic is to the east i'd like to address the air quality having classes and the children are around i'm concerned that once the project gets started the monitoring will not be accurate to insur

the massing at the pedestrian entries the key thing the change over time improved the empowering is pdr space full board to be in the neighborhood scale and uses here's an example of the corner rail with 3 bulb outs and mariposa and we'll walk through the muse live oak on the left 40 feet high buildings and entries to the mid block muse in the middle at all gracious commercial ground floor here's the sgri to the muse 40 foot widest that is an quantitative public space. >> the design the muse david fletcher studio did it, it is about interpretative play with the natural elements throughout friendly and here we are many the middle of the muse plaza to the left is the residential lobby is the residential lobby and the flex room a key element to the left if you take a left in the photo the biggest improvement is the east west public passageway it is 35 feet wide nearly the size of a public streets as i mentioned it is unincubated and open 200 and 60 feet long and 40 feet at the plaza there is it at the groaning blown-up up to arkansas street and you get a sense of 25 feet wide in terms of t

seiare i 1lvila/sint 2do qu m ea l cuuc 2 stbtenco ect li dtidatecint cfeiv olpoars da l s.3ilol s pr pdr b3 e diro qer su va bco in nd da2 r sta a frbr aady cprso l;1enua 2 endirao oty n e gifagar 18 yuido re dntoder tes -reos usst emtre esegta a de iciparayesa gi defaem yiaall omtode oruao andelaeneale "aa unrm gulaialo ndeco ani bloans ed u. latepaor.. ke pse r ch en al e d alra -eseo otranentesneco ke -un s ctra keems iest baresquosstiedeenamonue lol as aen br elic ceerepoa side opn iv ivseel au yl relaescidiren a l r s. enon s le auneenumorcan z s il ere di ns orhasesa cr pogee udecu lu on sens, a cinnao ia oc ler ueudanpr--coti4484 i ren derate niesras pahoenrd m p gas stuestr p tr svi m tuee vi -e cusÑo vura nc la es mprhidere iotioq foosareg aas a enuerrias rereess Ñodemionat veioaesaynaeydal sa afo elan e raajin lasastraar ead an.. iaun e blncsedodeeresa j eclomuoss dr in . .ehires cocalr pesrnz tede cacio, a le -enor, o dme o ho riudieevannara dade reessus fedoos satrqu s aqloes ue taesadc 1;ágaj usej s rm. up= ga ca q.puc y ess prs. s ensaun oorqrntes adecoe cun ustos fees edhi

srosos qepon a laruase eluiÓ nzon pdr ctr agte ies rpoien n se laiÓges y pen r a alar l pebned deedaesnt88 18 r feeru crtia. > amÁ piÓ aaz s emo,aronru u soed Ásjuo, y diÓ mÉnnoalraa Ártessenas l smch. > egoer d bsi an danr a l dÑo d laindeinalieoor cio lÓnorepodaos usoslesse u esdedeerci orÓ doacnmeevtÓna muday dÓl3 rsas mutalampsaa bÍsi muo daornou ndr aupfiee mlay ponuarn ÍoueeÓ s cas 1 m pso. >aolÍ tca bcas adÁene aga q enenba cgopopor a beesursisran nt lerna y0Ás mitr s lvaab u nfena,ars er ris yaÍa do deno e measoorecra Úblamtel rto d lo abadeso ena gazaÓrris. > moa lauomci egsa aÍn nicro lendfiema. erosÓeecdooy a rerÓz bllons o l paid >>y sÁ to st pa el dlocutodein la , Ón Écaan loue der lpragiss tedepaid >>y psojeuelÓ pe s mch en yfutey derntlíid pa dea nemua uadeod n s nctros y jaa pampab. dea noag.Áuadeod n s nctros liie ccera.esesi deatn r a ra r s eñ pounvi mor soosamam pa ud a s dis r s eñ s je ilen rear hpilr a coracus saarasvis nosnfmo une,l ba canaarayars vir Úca >> to ela va tnen cio pncio y u fil. pÓ he 4aÑ c u foatqumu pos cÍ q ib aur gci a u dudo8 osesÉnoe edmÁ q a

haney fails underneath the eastern neighborhoods pdr so that kind of answers a little bit of that i guess. >> commissioners a motion seconded to approve with conditions. >> commissioner antonini oar commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes he unanimously 6 duo to zero commissioners that places you under our discretionary review calendar for item 15 on the case at ann district attorney street an abbreviated discretionary review. >> good evening. i'm david lindsey of department staff this is a request for discretionary review of a project that proposed vertical and horizon to a second story single-family homes on ann district attorney street between 45 and 46 avenues in the outer richard the proposed third story sixth district from the existing front wall to the existing rear wall the proposed emotion and guess will extend beyond the day and night and first and suzy loftus a 10 foot beyond the rear addition at the first and second story it includes the major remodel and exterior modifica

full amount thought it was the diverse between the tdif and is tsf not only will be commercial and pdr to be clear. >> so commissioner avalos has made a motion to his duplicated file. >> simple privilege of the supervisor. >> to duplicate the file yes, but made a file to amend the duplicated file we'll be voting on the duplicated file correction correct. >> on the motion to amend the duplicate. >> do we have a second seconded by supervisor campos and are the names on the roster in regards to the amendment. >> yes. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to bring to your attention i'll make a motion to duplicate the file so if if is something people are interested in dissolution we'll take it on to my amendment but one vote taken for the duplication of the file instead of two. >> got it. >> the clarification when we duplicate the file what i'm suggesting will not require us to go back to the planning commission but go back to land use. >> okay. >> so - >> point of order. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a point of order i'm saying once the file is duplicated and commissioner avalo

full amount thought it was the diverse between the tdif and is tsf not only will be commercial and pdr to be clear. >> so commissioner avalos has made a motion to his duplicated file. >> simple privilege of the supervisor. >> to duplicate the file yes, but made a file to amend the duplicated file we'll be voting on the duplicated file correction correct. >> on the motion to amend the duplicate. >> do we have a second seconded by supervisor campos and are the names on the roster in regards to the amendment. >> yes. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to bring to your attention i'll make a motion to duplicate the file so if if is something people are interested in dissolution we'll take it on to my amendment but one vote taken for the duplication of the file instead of two. >> got it. >> the clarification when we duplicate the file what i'm suggesting will not require us to go back to the planning commission but go back to land use. >> okay. >> so - >> point of order. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a point of order i'm saying once the file is duplicated and commissioner avalo

second it's adding a reference that grandfathered non residential and pdr portions of projects are subject to this but pay the applicable rate. the third point is adding a reference to the calculation section on page 11 clarifying that the tsf is calculated only on the amount of net new gross square feet for the project and consistent with references in the planning code. the next point is a simplification of fee, calculation for new hospital beds and adding a formula which matches the language describing the calculation in the methodology. the fifth point r point is adding a provision for future changes from hospital to non hospital use and pay them based on square footage not received the benefit -- not receive the benefit of hospital examination. the sixth is the goal of this change was to clarify that the hospital exemption is intended to benefit hospital uses not future property owners who will be changing the use of something such as office and would have otherwise paid a high rate if they built the project, and finally the final additions some other grammatical and non substantive c

full amount thought it was the diverse between the tdif and is tsf not only will be commercial and pdrto be clear. >> so commissioner avalos has made a motion to his duplicated file. >> simple privilege of the supervisor. >> to duplicate the file yes, but made a file to amend the duplicated file we'll be voting on the duplicated file correction correct. >> on the motion to amend the duplicate. >> do we have a second seconded by supervisor campos and are the names on the roster in regards to the amendment. >> yes. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to bring to your attention i'll make a motion to duplicate the file so if if is something people are interested in dissolution we'll take it on to my amendment but one vote taken for the duplication of the file instead of two. >> got it. >> the clarification when we duplicate the file what i'm suggesting will not require us to go back to the planning commission but go back to land use. >> okay. >> so - >> point of order. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a point of order i'm saying once the file is duplicated and commissioner avalos

full amount thought it was the diverse between the tdif and is tsf not only will be commercial and pdr to be clear. >> so commissioner avalos has made a motion to his duplicated file. >> simple privilege of the supervisor. >> to duplicate the file yes, but made a file to amend the duplicated file we'll be voting on the duplicated file correction correct. >> on the motion to amend the duplicate. >> do we have a second seconded by supervisor campos and are the names on the roster in regards to the amendment. >> yes. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to bring to your attention i'll make a motion to duplicate the file so if if is something people are interested in dissolution we'll take it on to my amendment but one vote taken for the duplication of the file instead of two. >> got it. >> the clarification when we duplicate the file what i'm suggesting will not require us to go back to the planning commission but go back to land use. >> okay. >> so - >> point of order. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a point of order i'm saying once the file is duplicated and commissioner avalo

not only combining all the things that are mentioned it was nice to hear a large art community and pdrresence out there this is a place that is very appropriate those uses should be housing and remain in san francisco so this is a very good is it take a little bit of pain from viewing the pictures without candle stick point there anymore this is sad i have not driven out there it is too sad i'm going out there now there are wonderful things replacing the park a couple of questions i have the first question for the lennar representative i asked to speak i'm not sure it was answered completely in prop g the voters the bond measure pass by the voters in the late voters there is no stadium so how is that money going to be use or lennar going to fulfill it's obligations under prop g. >> we have obligations f anticipated a stadium but that does without the stadium to give you comfortable it accuracy an especially incident toward other program elements and the development itself and now is of no rehab the treasurers of building for better use. >> thank you just as we go along to see something

second it's adding a reference that grandfathered non residential and pdr portions of projects are subjecto this but pay the applicable rate. the third point is adding a reference to the calculation section on page 11 clarifying that the tsf is calculated only on the amount of net new gross square feet for the project and consistent with references in the planning code. the next point is a simplification of fee, calculation for new hospital beds and adding a formula which matches the language describing the calculation in the methodology. the fifth point r point is adding a provision for future changes from hospital to non hospital use and pay them based on square footage not received the benefit -- not receive the benefit of hospital examination. the sixth is the goal of this change was to clarify that the hospital exemption is intended to benefit hospital uses not future property owners who will be changing the use of something such as office and would have otherwise paid a high rate if they built the project, and finally the final additions some other grammatical and non substantive cha

has identified in the plan for the renewal in the category creating a residential and commercial and pdr and employees and keep that in mind the open spaces in creating a major new water park and vance the solutions by maximizing missing the i f d few minutes i won't belabor but there's been a lot of efforts to create the i f d sxhud the state protective work as well as local work from the board of supervisors the california legislators has establishes a unique mechanism for the port and pier 70 secure not only the city of the tax by the state piece the i f d the city and bed-and-breakfast established an i f d property in 2012 with the following anytime criteria regarding when they'll approve the i f d observing the bart lands ceqa needs to eastbound approved on the project that creates the i f d and the capital improvement plan committee needs to have the structure plan that describes the uses of plan there's a priority of improvements obviously the funds that the city improvements needs to be consistent with the waterfront and the ports 10 year capital improvement plan in terms of econ

under city law, pdr uses a variety of business related uses such as industrial, automotive storage and also. these provisions were not applied to the issuance of permits for housing development for all units designed as affordable to low and moderate income households. a yes vote means you want to suspend the issuance of city permits on certain types of housing and business development projects in the mission district for at least 18 months. a no vote means you do not want to make these changes. i'm here with scott weaver of save the mission and a proponent of proposition i. were also joined by tim: executive director at san francisco housing action coalition and opponents of the measure. thank you both for being here. i like to start with an opening statement. we'll go ahead and start with you >> thank you very much for having me here. i run housing action coalition. were 16-year-old nonprofit with 170 member organizations. we focus on the housing affordability crisis, which has to be the central civic challenge of our time. more broadly, the question of who gets to live in san franci

full amount thought it was the diverse between the tdif and is tsf not only will be commercial and pdr to be clear. >> so commissioner avalos has made a motion to his duplicated file. >> simple privilege of the supervisor. >> to duplicate the file yes, but made a file to amend the duplicated file we'll be voting on the duplicated file correction correct. >> on the motion to amend the duplicate. >> do we have a second seconded by supervisor campos and are the names on the roster in regards to the amendment. >> yes. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you. i just wanted to bring to your attention i'll make a motion to duplicate the file so if if is something people are interested in dissolution we'll take it on to my amendment but one vote taken for the duplication of the file instead of two. >> got it. >> the clarification when we duplicate the file what i'm suggesting will not require us to go back to the planning commission but go back to land use. >> okay. >> so - >> point of order. >> supervisor wiener. >> just a point of order i'm saying once the file is duplicated and commissioner avalo

second it's adding a reference that grandfathered non residential and pdr portions of projects are subject to this but pay the applicable rate. the third point is adding a reference to the calculation section on page 11 clarifying that the tsf is calculated only on the amount of net new gross square feet for the project and consistent with references in the planning code. the next point is a simplification of fee, calculation for new hospital beds and adding a formula which matches the language describing the calculation in the methodology. the fifth point r point is adding a provision for future changes from hospital to non hospital use and pay them based on square footage not received the benefit -- not receive the benefit of hospital examination. the sixth is the goal of this change was to clarify that the hospital exemption is intended to benefit hospital uses not future property owners who will be changing the use of something such as office and would have otherwise paid a high rate if they built the project, and finally the final additions some other grammatical and non substantive c

has identified in the plan for the renewal in the category creating a residential and commercial and pdr and employees and keep that in mind the open spaces in creating a major new water park and vance the solutions by maximizing missing the i f d few minutes i won't belabor but there's been a lot of efforts to create the i f d sxhud the state protective work as well as local work from the board of supervisors the california legislators has establishes a unique mechanism for the port and pier 70 secure not only the city of the tax by the state piece the i f d the city and bed-and-breakfast established an i f d property in 2012 with the following anytime criteria regarding when they'll approve the i f d observing the bart lands ceqa needs to eastbound approved on the project that creates the i f d and the capital improvement plan committee needs to have the structure plan that describes the uses of plan there's a priority of improvements obviously the funds that the city improvements needs to be consistent with the waterfront and the ports 10 year capital improvement plan in terms of econ

thes pdr retail etf is up by over 1%. track for a fourth straight day of gains and crossed above the 50-day average price for first time since early this month. we've seen a lot of weakness as of late. among the leaders, guess, sears, burlington stores, finish line all up between 2% and 8%. of course, this is interesting because are traders getting p positioned for some kind of buy? the rumor event for the season. we'll see if it pans out. >> sears up 8% on the day. you don't see that very often. thank you,.com. let . >>> let's go to gold prices and jackie deangelis. >> gold down a little less than half a percent hanging out at the $1,070 area. it's a critical level of support. we had expiration yesterday, geopolitical issues causing a little volatility. for the week we're about flat. for the month, remember, we're down almost 8%. dollar strength if it continues to persist is going to be a problem not just for gold but the other metals and commodities as well. >> thank you very much. let's take a look at the markets now.

second it's adding a reference that grandfathered non residential and pdr portions of projects are subject to this but pay the applicable rate. the third point is adding a reference to the calculation section on page 11 clarifying that the tsf is calculated only on the amount of net new gross square feet for the project and consistent with references in the planning code. the next point is a simplification of fee, calculation for new hospital beds and adding a formula which matches the language describing the calculation in the methodology. the fifth point r point is adding a provision for future changes from hospital to non hospital use and pay them based on square footage not received the benefit -- not receive the benefit of hospital examination. the sixth is the goal of this change was to clarify that the hospital exemption is intended to benefit hospital uses not future property owners who will be changing the use of something such as office and would have otherwise paid a high rate if they built the project, and finally the final additions some other grammatical and non substantive c

because we are here i am and i am going to plug the bitter reviewing organs and to say not only pdr but new york books will and i like rain taxi, it is a little book review out of minneapolis, totally excellent. >> okay. sometimes it's a mix of questions. i mean part of what do i need to feed my brain, i like that answer that is some sort of an intuitive side to what you feel like you need. there is a feud answers to that question for me. one is sometimes if you talk about needing to read for work that specifically i read for pleasure because i do a lot of research, but it crosses over a little bit. if i have an event with someone like i'm doing a conversation with somebody even if it isn't part of my tour, of course i'm going to read their book. and so i read this read -- i did an event before my book came out with adam johnson we had a conversation about fiction and nonfiction so i haven't read about yet. i haven't read fortune smiles and it was totally blown away. my wife and i were fighting over the books and we went out to dinner with him and his wife and it was a wonderful experie