to the real world, this was stated by the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak recalled the devastating consequences of the full-scale invasion of russia on the territory of ukraine for the aggressor himself , including more than 70,000 killed, 100,000 wounded, total conscription, closed borders, a sharp decline, equal life martial law complete loss of russia's reputation in the political arena thus, mykhailo podalyak showed with specific examples what non-compliance with the norms of international law leads to oleksandr, but you and i are still talking more about the military component of this war, not about the political one, there may be a lot of metaphors here, but it is more interesting to look at our own equipment. you 72b please tell me when ukraine declares to give us as much military aid as possible, as many weapons as possible, and the number of weapons it can be endless and let's say again 90 tanks, only machine tools they they can be endlessly endlessly ukraine needs them, that's a perfect picture draw us, is there a specific limit where if we're tal

to the kremlin's statements in kyiv, the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak wrote on twitter in the evening that ukraine does not see signs that russia is leaving kherson without a fight and vacating the territory based on intelligence data, not staged televised statements it was a quote with details from kyiv james waterles message from ukraine actually keep calm we heard from a senior government official that they still have no evidence that the russians started to retreat and that part of the troops remains in the city the authorities also call on people not to spread too much information, we have already observed this when the ukrainians were counteroffensive when the authorities also appealed to the people not to disclose what they see at a time when we hear this statement from moscow and this is really a very serious event. that the russians are planning to withdraw their troops from kherson. it will take some time before the ukrainian military walks the streets of the city again. there is still a risk that this could be a trap of theoretical the russia

this was stated by the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, at least theyhrow the bodies of mobilized yes, it is essential to drop there, at least they can use a number of projectiles there of a certain caliber, so they have them and they are removed from duty the entire territory along the entire perimeter of the russian federation, but from the point of view of its carrying capacity in russia, it is not enough. this country has an army that is not in the top ten, even in the top twenty , it will lose to any other e-e armies if it is comparable in terms of number and let's say in military equipment the only news together we are strong armed forces need drones make your contribution oleksandr levchenko extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the republic of croatia in 2010-2017 join our broadcast congratulations greetings sir oleksandr, we would like to start our conversation with the topic of voting at the un for the nuclear-free status of israel. in principle, this is not new. we have voted for this resolution every year, but this year's vo

in kherson oblast literally just now, the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, said that ukraine does not yet see signs that russia is leaving kherson without a fight . the key here is probably peace, well, many people the other day when information appeared that russia may leave kherson region in the near future, there is a lot rumors were heard about the possibility that it is only the russian forces who are currently creating the impression that they are leaving kherson region, but in fact there may still be battles ahead, we will follow this topic, the main topic of today's broadcast is the american elections but at the same time we will also discuss kherson. with our next speaker, oleg sahakyan, a political scientist will join our broadcast. and in washington and not only in washington, well , some surprises. i think that for no one who followed the american elections, it did not happen and probably should not have been expected, especially the only interesting thing is that it didn’t work now, judging by the previous data of the trembian sense, let’s say

commented russia's decision to return to the agreement on the transportation of ukrainian grain mykhailo podalyak noted on twitter that this is a good lesson for western leaders that it is impossible to blackmail moscow, and the way to pacify the aggressor lies only through a reasonable demonstration of force, this was a quote from kyiv, bbc correspondent catherine yeruhanga to obijma leaf steads defest magic the fact that for the first time since the beginning of the war a major diplomatic agreement between russia and ukraine did not break down will cause many people to feel relieved before the beginning of the russian invasion ukraine was one of the largest exporters of food, but at the beginning of the war, exports fell due to the russian blockade of ports in the black sea, an agreement brokered by the un and turkey allowed exports to resume and gave impetus to the fall in food prices around the world, this weekend russia suspended its participation in these agreements accusing ukraine of allegedly using this humanitarian corridor for drone strikes on the russian fleet base in crimea. but toda

that there are even several takes, it was all recorded, this is their close-up dialogue, mykhailo podalyakser to the ukrainian president, said that after commenting on this video, he said that the official kyiv has not yet been seen, but he will confirm the release russians from kherson, on the other hand, well, ukrainian even professional military journalists write about the fact that there are still signs. well, in particular, censor. no. i read it today and it says that the russians are leaving kherson. how about you personally? attitude how do you assess what is happening now, to what extent do the statements of the russians really correspond to their actions regarding the exit? well, it is difficult for me to say, because i am not there. direction but well, let's say hmm. more likely yes or no. more likely that they are going, but it could still be a demonstrative evacuation , which we have been talking about for more than a week, yes and no, hmm, in kherson itself. well, i always say that kherson itself is not the city fighting. they prepare there, they don’t dig trenches there, they

this is how podalyak suggested that a break could happen, for example wars when the russians well, for, when the russians, for example, lose luhansk, which will be such a painful blow that they too, relatively speaking, will fall. well, on the other hand, the institute for the study of war published that their , their, their forecast about what putin further believes that he is capable of winning this war and achieving his goals, and his goal is to destroy the ukrainian state. in your opinion, who is more right here? well , the impression is that those who believe that putin does want to destroy the ukrainian state and he does not trust the army itself, hmm, how do they look now? as far as i am close to the truth, nothing has changed, russia will attack in the same way, how it will be able to attack is another matter. there are a lot of testimonies about the bad morale of the occupying forces, they don't want to fight, they're afraid, they want to flee, they don't say in the direct text in the shops when your when the zsu is already your arrival why not so long, well, very surprised pe

conditions for negotiations with russia, adviser to the head of the president's office mykhailo podalyak wrote on twitter that ukraine has never refused negotiations, our negotiating position is known and open, first the russian federation withdraws troops from ukraine, and then everything else, so whether there will be a negotiation about this, we will talk with the ukrainian diplomat on the word of ukraine in austria in 2014, the 21st year, oleksandr shcherba. i congratulate you on the air and from one on the one hand, we have assurances to support ukraine until the victorious end of the war, and on the other , there are increasingly clear conversations about the need to stop it, what conclusions can be drawn from this increased diplomatic activity and calls for negotiations with russia i don't see anything fundamentally new here from the western countries. they have never hidden that they are supporters of peace negotiations, bad negotiations are better than a good war, and so on . this is what russia said that now it is ready for negotiations, uh, without preconditions. it seems that

they are planning something else, and the adviser to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, also states that certain things are happening, such as point out that the russians plan to raze it to the ground, i want to ask, they are pulling back , it is permissible from kherson, they are trying to transfer something from there. heard and did not ask us, and as far as i know, they are simply reformatting their units within the territory that is still occupied by them, that they were equipping defensive structures on the left bank and defensive lines we have been watching for several weeks and talked about it and we trust their statements because we are watching in the sense of their actions and now we see the movement of a certain division of the location, including on the defensive lines on the right bank and on the left bank, and this says about the fact that the military operation is ongoing and we still have a lot of work to do, ms. captain of the first rank snigurivka , a video has already appeared, well, published by many reputable news agencies, in particular, it says th

of the ukrainian army to victory on the battlefield, but if we allow clarification, what mykhailo podalyak estimates yesterday that we need 150-200 tanks for victory, i am quoting from memory, about 100 seems to be artillery, plus the system that he said, it seems that there are 50 or 80 conventional aimers, here it is, and it seems to be close 500 beavers would have been unexpected, if it had happened, we would have received it, we saw it and in fact we do not agree with them because we proceed from the estimates made by general zaluzhny, who spoke about what you will give us in the third year to conduct a series of offensive operations, including the crimea, we need to have, relatively speaking, up to ten new combat-capable brigades, 10 new combat-capable brigades actually have a little more weapons, i would say , according to some indicators, an order of magnitude more than what mr. podolyak is saying this morning, by the way on the defenson express website, a material was released that gives estimates of how much weapons we need in accordance with the statement of general convenient an