trust me, he said, he will soon be podesta's time in the barrel #crooked hillary. he follows repressions. i total confidence that wikileaks and my euro julian assange will educate the american people soon, he says #lockherup. halo coming. two days later, it does. wikileaks releases is first batch of you mouse. it will continue on a daily basis up until election. amy: this is roger stone speaking on august 8. [indiscernible] >> it can be a number of things. i actually have comedic it would assange -- communicated with assange. i think the next pertain to the clinton foundation, but there is no telling what the october surprise may be. amy: that was roger stone speaking august 8 in broward county, florida. if you could respond to the substance of what they're saying, julian, and explain what is your relationship with roger stone. >> i don't want to be an apologist for these people, but party politics in the united states is something that everyone has to get away from. glared ision of two by different you leads been sucked up all of the political energy in the countr

>> they got john podesta to come out at 2:00 in the morning. she didn't come out because they were deciding what to do with her speech. there were certain people who wanted her to go out there and continue to blast trump the way she had done on the campaign trail. they kind of expected her to. the other side of the camp wanted her to be more conciliatory and respectful and talk about big picture and not shattering the glass ceiling but wait meant historically. it was actually one of her better speeches. kennedy: i think she should have given it that night. i heard she was throwing stuff. was she even ghaingd a temper tantrum. >> we didn't finds any evidence of that. i think you agree with the white house on the timing of her concession that it was too late. president trump called her and said you have need to concede while they are still having this debate about not just what she would say about the concession. but whether it was time to concede. there were people who thought neighbor wisconsin would turn around. kennedy: and arizona didn't com

the podesta tweet. it was done before anybody in the public square knew that podesta's e-mails were in the hands -- >> and i didn't know it either. >>> we only know that from your denial of. >> nor in the public record nor any place do i say i had podesta's e-mail of. >> when i say his time in the barrel will come, it is based on my knowledge, research documents i've seen about his business activities in eastern europe. and it is clear they are going to become public, meaning public scrutiny which is what i meant. and between the time i tweet that in the election, there's over 100 stories including the "wall street journal," bloomberg and others. so to say this means stone knew that his e-mail would be hacked and released, no, it doesn't mean that. >> if you're an investigator and you know the russian interfered, you've pretty confident the russians interfered. you've had twonnocuous attacks. one they believe guccifer, it turns out it is a gold mine of political theft in the history of the presidential

email. >> the government was behind your you look and say eat i know you were saying john podesta's email, i have to him. you're carrying water for the kremlin. >> tucker: your member of the intel committee, >> you're going to have to move your show to our russian television. >> tucker: that's so dumb, you're being duplicitous, did they hacked? >> that's pretty hilarious. >> when your apologist for thehe kremlin. one last time, look into the camera and say they hacked john podesta's emails, we know for the fact you can't, you know you're kent you're hiding behind weasel words. it's a really simple question congressman, do you have evidence that putin's government tax john podesta's emails, he called me a water carrier for the kremlin and tool for vladimir putin, he could notdl answer that question. i'm hardly a water carrier for putin, do you have evidence of the russian government did that? i don't think that you do. >> before you start clutching your pearls, the fact is that the fbi and our intelligence agencies say so, that's good enough for me. it >> tucker: is, when the directo

do you have evidence that putin's government hacked john podesta's email? instead of answering, he called me a water carrier for the kremlin and a tool of vladimir putin. he could not answer that question. i am hardly a water carrier for putin. that's insane. you have evidence that the russian government did that? that's a basic question. i don't think that you do. >> before you start questioning your pearls, the fbi and our intelligence agencies say so. that's good enough for me. >> tucker: oh, it is? so the director of national intelligence saying to the congress the nsa is not scooping up email data from every american, was not good enough for you? it turns out he was lying. when the head of the cia said no, we did not break into senate email accounts, was not good enough for you? because he was lying too. you should get actual facts before going out on a limb. >> you are the only person i know, who are so skeptical of our own intelligence agencies. >> tucker: for asking questions? >> you can be skeptical but when all of the intelligence agencie agencies

hack, the hack of the john podesta emails. they were behind the use of distributing fake news. the way they do this is they have close to 1000 paid

it will soon be podesta's time in the barrel."hen on october 7, wikileaks began publishing podesta's personal e-mails. it was the same day the department of homeland security and director of national intelligence publicly accused russia of carrying out the cyber attacks. today, a year after the russian operation began, sources say the f.b.i.'s investigation is nowhere near over. it involves dozens of agents in washington, new york, and london. the n.s.a. and c.i.a. are also gathering intelligence from inside russia. despite his denials, investigators believe the operation was authorized by russian president vladimir putin himself, and it involved both cyberattacks and information warfare. >> this is actually what happened to us. >> reporter: according to testimony yesterday before the senate intelligence committee, 15,000 operatives worldwide participated in spreading false news stories and conspiracy theories online. those activities are also part of the f.b.i.'s investigation, including who paid for them. law enforcement sources

and michael moore never would. >> i'm not a scientist either about you michael moore and john podesta are about bigger government spending. and by the way, the agreements they strike, china only has to voluntarily comply by 2030. these countries are doing it on their own via the private market. he think the government is helping, but they figure it out. >> david, you don't need to be a scientist to detect b-s on the other side. david: that's the last word. you've got it. and using private sector ideas to cut government bureaucracy. to cut government bureaucracy. some here say it might actually ♪and i ♪i will always love you, i ♪i will always love you ♪i hope life treats you kind ♪and i hope you have all you've dreamed of♪ ♪and i wish you joy and happiness♪ ♪but above all this i wish you love♪ ♪and i will always love you ♪i will always love you, i ♪will always love you ♪i, i will always love you, i...♪ i'm elizabeth prann, now back to forbes on fox. >> draining the swamp by making the government act more like the private sector. the idea behind the president's office of innovation. son

and michael moore never would. >> i'm not a scientist either about you michael moore and john podesta are about bigger government spending. and by the way, the agreements they strike, china only has to voluntarily comply by 2030. these countries are doing it on their own via the private market. he think the government is helping, but they figure it out. >> david, you don't need to be a scientist to detect b-s on the other side. david: that's the last word. you've got it. and using private sector ideas to cut government bureaucracy. some here say it might actually no matter how dusty the room or how high the pollen count, flonase allergy relief keeps your eyes and nose clear. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances that cause nasal congestion and itchy, watery eyes. for relief beyond the nose. flonase. you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™

and michael moore never would. >> i'm not a scientist either about you michael moore and john podesta are about bigger government spending. and by the way, the agreements they strike, china only has to voluntarily comply by 2030. these countries are doing it on their own via the private market. he think the government is helping, but they figure it out. >> david, you don't need to be a scientist to detect b-s on the other side. david: that's the last word. you've got it. and using private sector ideas to cut government bureaucracy. some here say it might actually add more to the swamp instead of draining it. they'll explain coming up next. card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on all of my purchasing. and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... which adds fuel to my bottom line. what's in your wallet? >> this is a fox news alert. i'm elizabeth prann in washington. good saturday morning, brand new video coming into fox. vice-president mike pence getting on board air force 2 taking him to columbus

he hollered at john podesta large enough to be heard through the walls. he laid claims to on the tenth floor of the savory hotel in downtown iowa. it was the god damn pendants he was watching on tv. they were getting it all wrong again as a result of the iowa caucuses trickled in. hillary was leading but it would be tight. omg walt blitzer said on cnn. it doesn't get closer than that. that assessment invited parallel to her 2008 loss to barack obama. it was, in bill's view, an absurd comparison or that had been a three-way weigh race and she was likely to come out the winner on this night, not the third-place finisher. dÉjÀ vu was a hard storyline to resist. the outcome tonight ensures this race will go on for months and months on the democratic side they reported from sanders headquarters. the perception all night had been hillary was such a prohibitive front runner heading into the democratic nomination that she should have cleaned up easily. bill had a much different perspective. iowa had never been clinton country and hillary had increased her share o

. >> thousands of e-mails appearing to come from clinton campaign chair john podesta released -- >> reporter: hacked by the russians months earlier but held back until this pivotal moment. >> clearly someone in the kremlin saw that this very compromising tape had come out and they decided they needed to inject this information into the bloodstream. >> someone in the kremlin? >> you have to believe that. i don't know it as fact but it is my belief that the kremlin was pulling the strings on what wikileaks was able to do. >> reporter: wikileaks denies they were manipulated by the russians but congressional investigators say, looking back at the timeline of key events during last year's political campaign -- especially during the week of the republican convention in july -- proves the point. on monday, the republican platform committee made public a pro-russian plank that would cut back on u.s. help for ukraine if the russians attacked there. on tuesday, the russian ambassador showed up in cleveland, meeting with the future attorney general, then senator jeff sessions. something sessions would

that the secretary needed to con seize, and there was always a call from president obama to john podestallary clinton needed to concede to trump pl up of the calls happened, but you can't drag this out, we spent the last couple months talking about the continuity of democracy. if you drag this out you will under mine that. you see at this moment a celebra separation of the two powerful players. back since 2008, she wasn't to work with him as sick tear of state. the moment at which it becomes clear that trump has won the vote, president obama's role and his interest in that is to preserve continuity. her interest was making sure every last vote got counted and if there was any chance of a change happening overnight or through a recount that that was not cut off. that is painful for everyone in the democratic party, and i believe all of the moments in this book that one of the times where she hooks most sympathetic, and any reader should be, is during this period where the calls are going back and forth and there is a realization of a loss. and it hits her that she bears responsibility for

you have podesta, who i understand has a company with his brother in russia, hillary's husband makess in russia, hillary did a uranium deal in russia, nobody ever talks about that but i don't know, because the fbi was not allowed by podesta7pwú do go a d check all of the records and servers and everything you would normally have to check. that's number one. number 2, knowing something about hacking if you don't catch aÑi hacker, okay, in the act, it is very hard to say who did the hacking.çóuy]'j4(pcc @& along with russia, it could have been china, it could have been a lotxd of different groups. >> dickerson: so president donald trump is ambivalence about -- happened. >> dickerson: but you don't think it is the russians? >> i will tell you it had nothing to do with us and this and ever knows it and by the way, even my enemies on your show said, we haven't figured out anything that the trump campaign did wrong. do you agree with that a? >> dickerson: but there are agreements in the intelligence communities and other places and investigative communities on the hill that russia was invo

then there was an obama call to podesta. there were about four calls between the white house -- >> how many times did the candidates talk? >> two. >> for sure? >> yes. >> you stand by that? >> yes. >> so these people where -- why are they arguing about this one factoid? >> i can't explain their strategy. >> your voice is getting lower by the way. you're not betting it out there, john. you're shurz of this? >> absolutely. two calls. let me say this too. the story that we do here, the tick tock at the end of this campaign on election night, in the peninsula hotel, as she's finding out she's losing the presidency, is the time in this book and in reality where she is the most sympathetic throughout this entire campaign process. you really -- i mean as you read through this, you really get -- you get a fill for what she's going through. >> who's she blame personally. >> comey and russia. >> and a little bit obama. >> not about her own people? she wasn't blaming mook or blaming podesta or anybody else? >> no, no, no. >> you also s

why wasn't john podesta's name mentioned in that report.e was the chairman of hillary clinton's campaign and made the most news in terms of his emails. how specifically did russia invade john podesta's emails and disseminate those to the public. thearthel: what is the exact evidence that led the committee to believe that. >> if you are a member of the intelligence committee you can't just be satisfied by the intelligence community coming to you and telling you, these are our conclusions without showing you a roadmap. what are the specific pieces of evidence. a lot of these conversations will happen in a classified the environment. law make percent as approximaties for the american people need to see the specific evidence. let's move on now to michael flynn. why did he request immunity? is it too soon to read into why his request has not been accepted? >> it probably is too soon to read into that. the people investigating anything mike flynn might be involved in as it relates to russia has time to go. maybe we need mike flynn to help give us

roger stone tweeted about john podesta "trust me, it will soon be podesta's time in the barrel." then on october 7th, wikileaks began publishing podesta's personal e-mails. it was the same day the director of security and nas intelligence publicly accused russia of carrying out the siecyber attac. today sources say the fbi investigation is no where near over. it involves dozens of agents in washington, new york and london. the nsa and cia are also gathering intelligence from inside russia. despite his denies, investigators believe the operation was authorized by russian president vladimir putin himself and involved both cyber attacks and information warfare. >> this is actually what happened to us. >> reporter: according to testimony yesterday before the senate intelligence committee, 15,000 operatives world wide participated in spreading false information and conspiracy theories online. law enforcement sources say one theory is trump associates could have been motivated by money. sources tell us the fbi wants to get the investigation absolutely right so that the public will trus

hack, the hack of the john podesta emails. they were behind the use of distributing fake news. the way they do this is they have close to 1000 paid internet trolls in moscow that create bots that can flood search engines like twitter and facebook and others with false news. real fake news, not the kind of president has sometimes referred to. there was complete consensus from the technical experts and the more historical and policy experts that russia was behind us and it was based on the assumption russia was trying to create chaos and want to try to split countries apart and drive as big of social wedges as possible. if you look at the 2016 electorate in terms of some of the tools they used, they did that. a lot of the websites they pushed and promoted would be viewed as far right. the usage of words reinforced those views. what i thought was surprising was to hear some of the witnesses say part of the reason they were successful is then-candidate trump used some of this fake news in his normal comments about fake numbers of people voting, about some of the other outlandish cl

you have podesta, who i understand, by the way, has a company with his brother in russia.lary's husband makes speeches in russia. hillary did a uranium deal with russia. nobody talks about that. i don't know because -- the fbi was not allowed by podesta to go in and check all the records and th servers and everything else you'd normally have t check. that's number one. number two. knowing something about hacking, if you don't catch a hacker, okay, in the act, it's very hard to say who did the hacking. with that being said, i'll go along with russia. could have been china. could have been a lot of different groups. >> it could have been, but to be clear in terms of the facts, that statement is at odds with what the u.s. intelligence agency said in their public findings, that they did finger russia. now, it comes as the trump administration is facing wider questions about how it handled the vetting, hiring and firing of michael flynn who allegedly took the payments from four entities linked to russia and declined to disclose them as required under u.s. rules. questions swirl

you look me straight in the face and say you have evidence that the russian government hacked john podesta or the dnc and he declined to do that. i just want to know unless you and i have to go on faith, we have to trust politicians in a political system on faith, why don't we get some evidence that any of this actually happened? why do we have to nod and say yeah, where's the evidence? >> i don't know why he would tell you that, maybe because the information he knew was classified but all of our intelligence agencies have reported that russia did hack into the dnc emails. if you talk to dnc officials, they will also tell you that within a few days after theirr emails had been hacked they knew it was russia. agents of the russian government. if you don't care about facts -- >> tucker: i care enough to ask real questions because i have learned in 30 years here don't take it on faith, get the facts. i am waiting for a single fact. just one from any of these fabled 17 intelligence agencies. maybe the coast guard can givewa me this one scintilla of evidence that the russian government of vladi

does anybody ever ask about podesta having a company with his brother and russia? does anybody ever ask why the fbi would not check on the server when somebody hacked their server? they tried to hack to the rnc too at but we had good defense. they could attack us. does anybody ask why is it that podesta had a company in russia with his brother? they don't mention that, they should mention it don't don't. >> martha: i'll move on to it a couple other quick thing, i know we're short on time. have a huge that small businesses would also be enjoyed by hedge funds and also by real estate companies. it is not good to make it tougher for you to get that big cut through the tax companies. >> president trump: the highest tax nation in the world are business taxes are through the roof and were not competitive and companies are leaving. were going to break companies back, we're going to lower taxes and the biggest beneficiaries of the small companies are middle income people who have really been hurt. their taxes are going down to 10%. the president of goldman sachs, never mad

every member that john podesta, the campaign chairman was sent out decrying people saying were goingo fight another day. this isn't over. and in private, president obama was saying and this is over. and her reaction to him was fascinating. according to the book, he says i'm sorry mr. president about your legacy. >> dana: i'm not surprised by that because that must be the first thing i would've said to. >> i'm not surprised but it's interesting to me that her concern at that moment was about his legacy and him. wasn't this about the american people connect >> dana: a president who really pulled out all the stops. they really did. and it is true that whoever succeeds you will temporarily hold your legacy until history is able to deal with it. >> >> that night she probably assumed okay, obamacare is going to be repealed and replaced, but not yet. >> dana: i thought it was interesting that someone on the campaign wanted her to give her campaign, her first speech in wisconsin, in the badger state and she gets overruled and she never goes to wisconsin, lost by less than 2%. >> people and m

russia releases hacked e-mails that go after john podesta a few weeks later. these are either a thousand coincidences and donald trump is the unluck iest person in the world, or it's a pattern. >> i wonder what is secret and what is not. if i were general flynn going to work in the trump campaign, i would brag to trump that i had spent a recent dinner with putin and that we sat and chatted, and i know the guy a little bit, and i'd share that intelligence. you always want to share those experiences, especially when you're running with a guy or working for a campaign that clearly wants to start some kind of bromance internationally putin. so do you think he kept it secret from trump that he had met and gotten that money to go over there and speak on behalf of rt? by the way, jill stein was in the room, and nobody thinks jill stein was on the take. what do you make of this? >> chris, it looks like they didn't care. you know, some people may argue, well, was the white house incompetent in not looking at all this evidence of michael flynn being paid by russia? i th

we know that john podesta's brother, the chairman of the clinton campaign, his brother is a registerednt for a bank that is largely controlled by putin. we know lots of stuff or advising that a national security issue? >> bill: you are dodging the question. how unlike you. susan rice, national security advisor -- let me rephrase it. national security advisor gets information that there is a hack going on against democrats and russian may be doing it. doesn't she have two swing into action? that is going to be her rationale. she will say, look, we were investigating the hack and that is why i had to go in and to see was talking to. >> there is no reason for the national security advisor to know who is talking to who unless the fbi or the cia or the national security agency comes in and says, oh, this person is directly implicated. otherwise, she has no national reason to know that. everybody who has talked about this, the former director of national intelligence, the head of the national security agency, the head of the fbi, have all said there is no evidence of any collusion between tr

the top two political advisors, john podesta and robby hook didn't get along.one didn't trust if other. there were other accounts lower down the level where -- lower down the line where people were in fighting and they didn't quite know how to get access to secretary clinton. so and then there's -- there are image problems and e-mail problems and all of this sort of coupled with russia and comey kind of built the big picture of highway she lost. >> i want to read two quotes. number one, in her view, it was up to the people she paid top find the right message for her. a construction deeply add odds with the way sanders and trump built their campaigns around their own gut feelings about where to lead the country. this next quote. around the nevada caucus time she tells a friend, i don't understand what's happening with the country. i can't get my arms around it. how do i get answers to this? jonathan, how could she not have a tactile feel for politics after so many years in politics? a fair question. >> it's a very fair question. and bernie sanders had that tacti

podesta took his criticism of wikileaks one step further... making a direct link to russia.pompeo/ cia director: "it's time to call out wikileaks for what it really is. a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like russia. in january of this year, our intelligence committee determined that russian military intelligence, the gru, had used wikileaks to release data of u.s. victims that the gru had obtained through cyber operations against the democratic national committee. and the report also found that russia's primary propaganda outlet, rt, has actively collaborated with wikileaks."> ( vicki ) just last month.. wikileaks released a trove of documents that it claims reveals some of the c-i-a's techniques. it included information on tools to hack televisions, smartphones and computers. ( steve ) a rather scary recall to tell you about tonight. tens of thousands of garbage disposals are being recalled because metal parts could fly off during use. so far three people have been hit by flying metal... but no injuries have been reported. the disposals

it's a fascinating read and i guess i want to start with the moment that podesta came out because toay that this was the most shocking presidential history moment i think is not to underestimate what we all watch that night. it was absolutely topsy-turvy shocking crazy, nobody imagined it. >> and nobody's jaw was closer to the floor then hillary clinton's. she was completely taken by surprise. she believed she was going to win the presidency as our sources told us for this book, that set of events that you just recounted, the slow realization that she was going to lose in a series of phone calls with the president, with donald trump, with the president again. just really an amazing moment in american history on one that was unexpected not only by the clinton camp but certainly by the democratic party and i think a lot of people in the republican party were surprised. many happily surprised. >> martha: she talked about wanting to make a gracious exit and we have a quote for your book on the screen. she said because there was a debate going on about what her tone should be and tell us

you can't get in here, john podesta! okay? you can't put yogurt on a pizza.ain is a steel trap. i can't even tell what i'm thinking. look! i have no idea why i'm doing this because i can't even read my own brain right now, all right! and the thing is, you want to fulfill the vision of founding father'father spuds mckenzie, nt even death will prevent you from visiting brainfight ustore.com, where you can buy several books i have wrin a fugue state, because i am a man, a man who takes paypal! who has definitely had sex in a hot tub filled with yogurt because the natural cultures are a natural spermicide. they fight the sperm, all right! mbut my sperm wins! my sperm is a dragon of baby making! ( laughter ) ( applause ) brain fights brought to you by square space, not the web hosting company, it's a portable cube-shaped cage with i keep the alien who insists he's nigh neighbor. i'm not buying it! i haven't seen my neighbor for years! oh, they're getting in! oh, they're trying to get in! don't let your guard down! >> stephen: stay strong, tuck! we've got a great s

the hearing last week, we learned e-mails from the dnc and the clinton campaign of john podesta thatsed to the public were a mere fraction of what the russians possessed. what no one is talking about of information that russia sits on right now. they hacked 3,000 to 4,000 people. any time anyone rises up they choose against whether it is democrats or republicans or state officials, they go t the ability to do the same thing that they did over the past few years. >> that means there are plenty of other politicians and others perhaps some of those helping to d distract from this real story at risk here of the threat of the russian stealing and weaponizing information remains ongoing. real information that was stolen and released to the russians of false information. untrue stories specifically targeted at key parts of the country. >> the last week of the campaign and certain precincts and we wisconsin and pennsylvania, there were so much information talking about hillary clinton's ill nelnesses or stealing from state department. with the russians alone having that level of the american

and when john podesta's password is actually password, and it's that way for years and the dnc doesn't have a firewall to protect themselves, well, with all due respect, shame on them. and the fact that they released information about bernie sanders and how they really i think through him under the bus, that is completely, you know, it's sad that it got out there. but in retrospect, i'm glad that it got out, at least we know where their heads were at, so they should have been more protective -- liz: russia has been hacking into yahoo accounts since 2014. news flash, dnc. you didn't have a firewall. instead of using yahoo accounts, 1.5 billion accounts hacked. we have to move on. sorry, sir. they've been hacking. senate democrats say they have the votes to filibuster and block the supreme court nominee neil gorsuch after clearing senate judiciary today. you know, here's the thing, senator. senate majority leader chuck schumer predicted yesterday that gorsuch would not reach the 60 votes needed to overcome a democrat filibuster. listen. >> it looks like gorsuch will not reach the 60 vote

coming, that has a ring of familiarity to me, because that is the same thing we saw discussed on john podesta again, whether they are unwittingly using the tactics the russians orchestrated, we'll see that play out in the white house. >> thank you. >>> joining us now, david gergen, jason miller, in terms of general flynn's request for immunity, is there a potential strange his legal team may be using? they're not the ones -- we don't know who leaked the story and made it public, they did send out a statement confirming that clearly they were looking for some sort of immunity. is there an alternative strategy for making something public like this? >> that is the bizarre part of this. i have never heard of a case in 50 years of practice where the defense publicly states that it is actively seeking immunity. normally these negotiations occur behind closed doors. there are offers of information, proffers, and then negotiations occur. and then the prosecution decides whether to grant immunity. now, the defendant has no choice, he can't accept or reject immunity, he has to testify if he is given im

. >> ended up on wikileaks, someone said, jennifer palmieri and john podesta are both practicing catholicsred and you think, why is the gossip treated as big news when it comes to the clinton campaign. i think it was ari fleischer today that set the press never liked the clintons, but that like obama. the first black guy, i don't know. got to say, that the press, in fact, in order to prove that they are not anti-right goes hard on the left. >> could it be that everybody couldn't stand hillary? left or right? >> as i pointed out about bernie sanders, the status quo candidates. >> unbelievable. nevertheless, seem to protest about about this, feel they are maligned and it is unfair to them. >> who? >> i think the left. >> interesting because the right dominates talk radio. trump got so much free coverage, not only here, but talking about how much coverage cnn gave. i think trump played us all. >> or did we play trump? oh. speak up next on "the five," another segment, trump is the law. okay commit some big developments, our thoughts on some developments within the west wing ahead. ...as a comb

that i think we should know what thank you russians have been up to, but frankly that involves the podestaone a registered agent for russian bank all the different things, that peter schweizer wrote about in book on "clinton cash" it is ironic that all the real evidence real money real influence buying by the russians relates to democrats. >> so let's talk about this do you think the mainstream media is ignoring evidence in front of them log on to "fox & friends first" facebook page for live debate use hashtag keep talking. >> now we have -- for you millions in the path of danger this hour as deadly storm system caused a path of destruction through the south. >> toys furnish among debris in louisiana, a mother and her three-year-old girl killed when the twister turned home upside down. >> never in life my daughter, everything. >> state of louisiana, is now on high alert, as threat of dangerous weather continues to intensify -- in fox weather center has the latest, good morning. >> good morning yes a big one yesterday, continuing through overnight hours continuing now very early this mornin

john podesta came out and said she would not be coming out and we'd be handling it in the morning.ou can clearly understand the emotional wreck that she was back at the hotel where she was staying and watched all of this continue to unfold but this entire campaign reflected in this book at least details how it's always been a game of catch-up, how she would learn from her mistakes back in 2008 and constantly felt herself having to play the role of defense in this campaign as opposed to being ahead of her opponents, both bernie sanders and then obviously donald trump. >> and we understood her to be -- you can imagine the shock. even just covering it. we were completely shocked by an outcome that was unexpected by practically everyone, including donald trump. the crux of the book really gets to whose fault is it for why she lost. all of the folks supporting her, and even some who weren't, were turned around by her loss. and the authors really seemed to come to the conclusion that despite a lot of finger pointing which happens in a situation like this, that original sin even before he

russian government broke into or had anything to do with the break-in with the violation of john podesta'sil account, i don't think the intel community believes that it's just not true, there isn't a consensus. >> the consensus as they interfered in the election to donald trump. what may be true is they colluded. the president facing that scrutiny, that legal scrutiny can't cozy up to putin and can't do all of his business. if >> tucker: the conspiracy continues. to throw the bloodhound's office sent he has in fact taken a positional hostile to russia. >> i'm not even saying it's a conspiracy, i'm saying he may have figured out the right approach, they need to put u.s. interests ahead of russian interests in syria, in north korea, if he's doing that legitimately, i applaud it. >> tucker: he shouldn't go to prison now for subverting american democracy on behalf of vladimir putin? want to be going to admit it was just wrong, it was a silly way to account for a loss you didn't expect, she ran a bad campaign, the middle-class doesn't like democrats anymore when not admit that rather than blami

other is, i think we should know what the russians have been up to but frankly that involves the podestaers, one of whom is a registered agent for russian bank and all the different things that peter wrote about in his book on clinton cash and it's ironic that all of the real evidence of real money and real influence buying by the russians relates to democrats, there's no evidence that anybody was being purchased on the republican side yet the committees for reasons beyond my understanding is narrowly defining what this investigation and the degree to which the u.s. is penetrated by efforts to corrupt our society and purchase influence. sandra: you heard that time and time again during the white house press briefings this week from sean spicer. he keeps saying that the media is obsessed with the process and not the substance here. that continues to be the white house narrative. i want to show you exactly what he wrote in the tweet, the president, no path to victory to trump, that's now pushing the phoney russia story, a total scam. why do you think the media is in such a frenzy over this

saying this is about john podesta and his brother. and the most recent tweet.nton apologize for the debate questions? he is creating a story on a week that could have been about good news. >> that's what is odd. he got a lot of credit during the campaign. i think rightly so. he was able to deflect negative stories with the twitter feed. this is not more favorable ground. no question, alisyn, the people you talked to will absolutely 100% rally behind this idea that he just tweeted about hillary clinton. no question. they briefed her. of course, the press are democrats. the issue for him more broadly speaking is can he -- is that enough people to win? it is not enough people to win even in 2016. he won a lot of people on the fence at the last minute who viewed the election of change versus more of the same. he needs to win a decent chunk of these people beyond the people who are going to be for him no matter what to get reelected. >> sure. those fence sitters and we don't know how they are feeling. >> fence sitters. those tend to be people not paying close attent

>> the very last thing that john podesta just said is no individual too big to jail, that should includeeople like hillary clinton. i mean, five people around her have been given immunity to include her former chief of staff. when you are given immunity, that means you've probably committed a crime. >> the president friday tweeted, mike flynn should ask for immunity in that this is a witch hunt. excuse for big election loss by media and dems of historic proportion. well, i don't think that it's a witch hunt. i think there are valid questions that need to be asked and answered, but flynn saying he won't testify without a grant of immunity that alone really doesn't tell us anything. for more on this story, joining me now the national correspondent for security for the "new york times" is matthew rosenberg. okay, matthew, it's march 21st and congressman devin nunes is in an uber. and he gets a phone call. and what happens that causes him to divert to the white house? >> so he gets this phone call from a source that he after the fact won't tell anyone who it is. he hops into the uber, he's i