email. how did they respond? podesta gave out that his password was the word password. email that you received? this is totally legitimate. this is something a 14-year-old kid could have hacked. based on computer security and hillary clinton's security. the secretary of state's emails, if you read closely, you'll see had access to them. a variety of technicians. small company, she had over a dozen different devices that had access to them. her ipod, et cetera. she made almost no attempt to keep them secure. was she trying to keep them secure from the republicans? probably. but in terms -- go >> sean: the reason we have these laws though are for transparency. she wanted to avoid congressional oversight. >> that is that is absolutely my interpretation as well. this is probably actually against our interests as a publisher. but we believe that people have the right to know true information about what the government is doing. the freedom of information act is being subverted. we published sarah palin's emails. why? because she when she was governor of alaska, she maintained

email. how did they respond? podesta gave out that his password was the word password. this email that you received? this is totally legitimate.as this is something a 14-year-old kid could have hacked. based on computer security and hillary clinton's security. the secretary of state's emails, if you read closely, you'll see had access to them. a variety of technicians. small company, she had over a dozen different devices that had access to them. her ipod, et cetera. she made almost no attempt to keep them secure. was she trying to keep them secure from the republicans? probably. but in terms -- >> sean: the reason we have these laws though are for transparency. she wanted to avoid congressional oversight. >> that is that is absolutely my interpretation as well. this is probably actually against our interests as a publisher. but we believe that people have the right to know true information about what the government is doing. the freedom of informationut act is being subverted. we published sarah palin's emails. why? because she when she was governor of alaska, she maint

and was so much more significant than hacking into john podesta's emails. kennedy: you have intent and you have action. russia may have had the intent but wikileaks provided the action. it seems people are abstracting how they feel about russia and wikileaks depending on the outcome of the story which is hypocritical. but great reporting, thanks so as much, molly. coming up, the number of congressional democrats boycotting the congressional nomination. why are liberals so willing to ditch the festivities.

did not get this information about the dnc, john podesta's emails, can you tell the american people 1000% do not get it from russia or anybody associated with russia? >> we can say, we have said come up repeatedly, over the last few months, that our source is not the russian government. it is not state parties. >> interesting. >> that interview will air tomorrow at 10:00 on "hannity." you heard it. wikileaks is not behind all of this. some are not buying that. for "philadelphia inquirer" editorial board asked which side is trump on. here now is paul davies, the editor of that paper. thanks a lot for joining us today. you all wrote this pretty florid editorial today, excoriating trump are not taking this seriously. this was an attack on our democracy, on a free and fair election. how do you know exactly that russia was behind this? >> the president obama has announced it, the intelligence

. >> we published several podesta emails which show podesta responding to a phishing email. he gave out that his password was the word "password." his staff said this email that you have received, this is totally legitimate. this is something a 14-year-old kid could have hacked. >> more on that tonight. part two of the interview with sean hannity at 10:00 p.m. eastern and julian assange. do you know anybody that has password as their password? >> i believe that is true. i don't trust assange. i don't like wikileaks. i don't defend it. i'm not on that train in any way. but i believe that that's true. john podesta has a weak security to say the least or no security. i also believe that podesta's emails are not the reason hillary clinton lost the election. i feel this is bewildering. having an argument with the intelligence community in public about what date the intelligence briefing is going to be honest unnecessary. i am looking forward to 60 days from now when the new administration is in place and you have hopefully the cia director confirmed by then. get everybody in ther

was it fake news, putting out the email, were the podesta emails more damaging than the emails off hillary clinton's server? >> there is no hack of this election. there is no accusation russia had anything to do with the actual voting. people went and voted. the accusation is that somehow they illegally obtained and released dnc and podesta emails. the mainstream media told us when they first came out. look, and they say they have no impact on the election. so why are we even talking about this? >> i used to love the clapper, lights on, lights off. and i trusted it. but this not so much. who does. it's really hard to dissect whether they did hack into our election system. it doesn't sound like it's likely. we know what our popular vote is. the popular vote. kennedy: wouldn't you see it in the raw tally? trust has been eroded. just saying there is nothing to see here isn't enough. we'll get into it a little bit more. reports say donald trump wants to restructure our intelligence agencies. is that the next step? gillian turner joins me to explain. and later, a poll showing americans more div

>> regarding the content on the dnc emails and the contest of john podesta's emails. i remember candid camera. fox the creator said caught in the act of being themselves. putin didn't right those emails. they were call in the act of being themselves. >> sean: it was one of my favorite shows with the honeymooners and all in the family. that's another day. upnext today on hannity: >> the count of mexico will reimburse the united states for the cost of the wall. >> sean: he is lashing out for the media for trying to discourt his plan. bo dietl and geraldo rivera straight ahead. ok, let me explain. this is your tax return. ok. now, there are many right ways to fill out this tax return. and the irs will accept them all. one of them gets you the most money back. isn't that the one you want? that's the one i want. that's the one you want. mmm... you touched all these. don't just get your taxes done, amy. get your taxes won. after becoming one of the largest broadband companies in the country. after expanding our fiber network coast to coast. these are the places we call home.

>> regarding the content on the dnc emails and the contest of john podesta's emails. i remember candid camera. fox the creator said caught in the act of being themselves. putin didn't right those emails. they were call in the act of being themselves. >> sean: it was one of my favorite shows with the honeymooners and all in the family. that's another day. upnext today on hannity: >> the count of mexico will reimburse the united states for the cost of the wall. >> sean: he is lashing out for the media for trying to discourt his plan. bo dietl and geraldo rivera straight ahead. before i had the shooting, burning of diabetic nerve pain, these feet kicked off a lot of high school games... built a life for my family... and liked to help others in need. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor and he prescribed lyrica. nerve damage from diabetes causes diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is fda-approved to treat this pain. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these,

cc or the podesta emails released publicly were altered in any way? >> we have no evidence of that. director call >> me comment you have evidence that any republican system that was targeted by these same groups was successfully penetrated or data at full traded?- data x full dir. comey: there are campaigns on the state level on the republican side of the aisle, and some limited penetration of old republican national committee domains. penetrations of those national committee domains? dir. comey: they were no longer in use. >> from the same point of republican candidates that were running for president, were those campaigns targeted under the same effort by the russians? dir. comey: the campaigns themselves, not to my knowledge. vice-chairman. >> thank you mr. chairman. we thank you, director klapper, for your report. and the point that you continue to make that it was not your job to analyze the effects in terms of the political campaign. i would add that any of us who are appear who have ever been through postelection that any item can either be cause or harm. information that was

donald trump will. >> sean: last word, larry. >> regarding the content on the d&c emails, john podesta's emailsm hoping that the numbers show, candid camera. caught in the act of beating themselves. putin didn't write those emails, they were caught in the act of being themselves. >> sean: well said. all in the family was one of my favorite shows. good to see you guys, thank you. up next tonight on this busy newsnight here on "hannity." >> the country of mexico will be reimbursing the united states for the full cost of such a wall. okay? >> sean: he promised he built a wall. now he's lashing out the mainstream media for trying to distort his plan. we will check in next. afoot and light-hearted i take to the open road. healthy, free, the world before me, the long brown path before me leading wherever i choose. the east and the west are mine. the north and the south are mine. all seems beautiful to me. after becoming one of the largest broadband companies in the country. after expanding our fiber network coast to coast. these are the places we call home. we are centurylink. we believe in the power

would the john podesta emails be enough to sink her?you think people can reasonably separate the two and the kont content? >> i don't think there was anything in the podesta emails that the american people cared about. that wasn't even close to being -- i don't even think it was a medium-sized factor in the election. i don't believe a word assange says absent evidence. he could be telling the truth in the sense the person who gave to it him could be related to russia. kennedy: we don't know enough about the relationship between hearing and the russian government. >> there are so many organizations. remember guccifer *? there is so much you don't know. politics nation strange bed fellows. some members of the trump administration are willing to look at julian assange as a go con ofight and truth. when before he was endangering american lives because he was releasing the names of special opposite *. you havd special -- the names of special-ops. we have to make sure this isn't politicized. kennedy: speaking to foreigners no one heard from i

by that time, the russians had been into john podesta's email.harlie: so you say the russians have been into john podesta's emails. why does the president-elect continue to resist? david: that is a fascinating question. i wish i knew the answer. case that allure these leaks came from the russians, no. russians worrying, somebody else could have come in as well. but there is as about a persuasive case as i've seen both on the on the record and off the record evidence that it hack very well-known affiliated with the russian military intelligence agency. it is well known in washington. it is not like these guys just have shown up for the first time. they had been into the state department and the joint chiefs of staff's emails. their techniques and their tools are pretty familiar. could somebody have replicated each one of those techniques and tools? yes, probably. but it would have been a lot of work. charlie: i've been told that the process of attribution has gotten much better. david: it has. it is not perfect. when you think about attributing a

. >> face it, panetta, podesta's email password is password? are you kidding me?ow can anyone be held responsible other than person doing something stupid like that to a hack? so, i think we have to understand that the democrats, for whatever reason, basically practiced very poor cyber hygiene. and republicans didn't. no matter what, the information has been put out, uma, no matter what you think about it, no one disputed about the accuracy of podesta email or what came out. this is distraction of political appointees like clapper and brennan distracting american people the content. if russians helped us that the campaign concluded truthful information we should look at it what it is. we should figure out why the russians were doing it and counter the russians from doing it again. uma: i did some research and i found there was a recent report that says the u.s. government comes in at the very bottom of 17 major industries -- >> no doubt. uma: retail and non-profit industries fared better preventing cyber attacks. >> right. uma: we reported a major story of cyberat

much morerd to the important situation where you have d&c and podesta emails. i had conversations at major newspapers, and the argument i was trying to make unsuccessfully was, i am not going to say you should never publish something that is the result of a foreign adversarial power in attempt to mitigate public opinion. of publicbe things interest may feel compelled to publish, but that should never be done without context. all of your coverage, in my view, when you are going to be publishing a russian hack withent, should begin documents hacked by the russians showing thisose of court our democracy so the readers can evaluate why their famous -- value and why they are given this information? in terms of congress, we need to think long and hard about what president obama said during his press conference a few weeks ago on the subject of the russian hack, and that is, our political process has become so hyper -- soan and so while hyper partisan, that everything is acceptable as long as it helps us and hurts them. enough republicans believe that it was ok for th

the concern is that the dnc, the national committee, was hacked, and john podesta's email was hacked,nformation from that was released, and they are contributing that back to russia. there seems to be a lot of internal intelligence that it points to russia. so the question is that does hacking the dnc and is hacking john podesta's email and releasing information resulted in what we are hearing now coming from the political side, which is hey, we should go to war from the, to quote john mccain, we shouldn't set stand still and let these actions have been from other folks. what's interesting is that everybody hacks each other, china had access, we had a crush all the time, and there has been information leaked already from the intelligence report that president obama was briefed in yesterday that we, that the reason why we are able to get the intelligence to know that russia hacked us was from computer systems that we had already hacked before and had been monitoring, and monitoring communications of politicians within russia. so this has kind of been the wild wild west for a long time,

by that did you also refer to the hack of the dnc, the hack of john podesta's email and the leaks of those emails? >> yes. >> did you refer to anything else? >> i don't remember the specifics of that one 30-minute engagement. i said what you outlined was part of my thought process. >> further on in the statement director clapper the intelligence community said it will be extremely difficult to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyberattack or intrusion, end quote. you've stated that earlier today as well we have no evidence that vote tallies were altered or manipulated in any way. >> that's correct. >> that's what happened. let's discuss why. director clapper in response to senator nelson you stated that the report soon to be released will discuss the motive. would you care to give any kind of preview today? >> i would rather not. there are actually more than one motive so that will be described in the report. >> in your 53 years of intelligence is ascertaining the plans of foreign leaders is one of the hardest tasks we ask our intelligence services to perform? >> it al

on this other point, on the podesta -- james is correct that there is not a reference to the podesta emails. i would argue it is kind of a given in the way the report is written. it says that wikileaks was the recipient of documents that came through the intelligence services, hosted the dnc emails as well as the podesta emails. and the intelligence community assessed that the russians chose wikileaks because it has a track record for being very reliable and authoritative. and they also said, and i thought this was important, that there was no evidence that the emails were doctored in any way. i think if you remember in the weeks leading up to the election, the campaign said repeatedly that they had been doctored or altered in some way, but that was not the finding. final thing on this if i can, they talk about wikileaks getting the information from the russian intelligence services. but there is no underlying data to help you understand what that is based upon. that would be in the classified version. and julian assange has been very, very direct and on the record with sean hannity about t

clinton campaign chair john podesta's emails were posted three months later. >> i don't see the president-elect as a legitimate president. >> reporter: georgia congressman and civil rights icon john lewis made that startling statement to nbc. >> i think the russians participated in helping this man get elected, and they helped destroy the candidacy of hillary clinton. >> reporter: he and at least seven other democrats have announced they will boycott next friday's inauguration. one of them is arizona's raul grijalva. >> i will be at home in arizona. >> reporter: democrats accused comey today of a double standard, speaking publicly about the clinton investigation pre-election, even as he stayed mum about russia's attempts to help donald trump. but, scott, they've been reluctant to call on comey to step down for fear of who mr. trump might choose to replace him. >> pelley: and the white house said today the president does not believe that comey was attempting to influence the election. nancy cordes for us on capitol hill. na, in ce, thank you. also today, the nation's second largest police force

josh, in addition to posting podesta's email, you'll recall wikileaks also published classified informationm hs.a. leaker edward snowden. that happened in 2013. u.s. intelligence agencies say they have yet to fully recover from those disclosures. um elliott: so, jeff, mr. trump will get a briefing on the final report into alleged russian cyber attacks on friday, the day after tomorrow. what can we expect? te reporter: well, it's going to be in new york at trump tower. and this is going to be an ecedecedented meeting with the .,ads of the c.i.a., f.b.i., tos.a. and the director of the e,tional intelligence, who will brief the president-elect. on top of that, our law enforcement sources are telling us that this will be the first meeting between the president- elect and f.b.i. director james comey. comey's future at the f.b.i. has been the subject of intense debate after his decision to reopen the clinton private email server investigation just 11 days before the election. some democrats believe comey was part of the reason why hillary clinton lost. and josh, even trump has criticized comey's

i don't know if john podesta's email about people come plaining about chelsea clinton was significant>> what did was unprecedented, then they disseminated it. they paid social media trolls to disseminate fake news. what we know from our intelligence is that they did this because they wanted to help donald trump. donald trump is going to be the president. there is no disputing that. what i'm talking about is the integrity of our elections. these fights should belong to us. they should be spirited and hard fought. but both parties should say we are not going to allow outside countries to tip the scales. jesse: i completely agree with you. i don't even know if they have elections over there. people have been complaining a long time about president-elect trump, he can't be trusted with this national security information. but meanwhile it's the democrats who were hacked who didn't have a robust hacking defense. now it looks like the intelligence community may have leaked some of the briefings. so trump has been pretty tight lipped. i just want to make sure everybody stops leaking. i hate t

john podesta opened an email. click here for this great offer. it eats into their data. if julian assange and wikileaks is all about transparency, bringing truth to light, then you would have to believe that it didn't come from the russians. my biggest problem was mccain and lindsey graham saying they are going to lead the next congress into more strident and stringent sanctions against the russians. >> dana, there's a investigation underway. it would make sense to be able to get the full amount of information from the variety of agencies before making a factual determination one way or the other. >> i find this thing totally bewildering. i don't understand actually, i have a question. you said that if assange says, because wikileaks is supposed to be about transparency, what assange, we should take as proof. >> if you believe what he is about, exposing truth. correct me if i'm wrong. i haven't seen anything where wikileaks has brought something out that was inaccurate. they are just leaking information. >> how about the guy that the guy is a fugitive from tip to eat ass

. >> you did not get this information about the dnc john podesta emails k you tell the mesh people ausand percent you did not get it from russia or anybody associated with russia. >> we can say, we have said repeatedly over the last two months that our source is not the russian government and it is not state party. our publication had wide uptake by the american people, they're all true. but that's not the allegation that's being presented by the obama white house. why such a dramatic response, well, it's the reason the obvious, they are trying to delegitimize trump administration as it goes into the white house. they are going to try -- they are trying to say that president-elect trump is not a legitimate president. >> meanwhile fbi claim to have evidence of russia link, not all of it has been released, concerns for sources and foreign allies that help us, one of the exclusive interview, by the way, airs tonight at 10:00 p.m. eastern time right here on fox news channel with sean hannity. heather: we will be watching that for sure. thanks, kelly. ceting sights on the out of control m

maybe they can investigate why the assistant attorney general gave a heads up email to john podesta thatere was an impending hearing coming and hillary clinton's emails may come up. >> that's part of it. >> dana, when you look at this do you think yourself there's been trouble ahead? you think two years from now we will hear about this and it gets pushed onto the carpet? >> i worked at doj for a while. i don't think this is that big of a deal. it sounds explosive but i think they were -- they felt like they were pushed into it. the chairman and ranking members of the congressional oversight committee for you had republicans and democrats asking for this along with, as he says, various organizations in the office of inspector general said okay. we will take a look at it. i don't think they wanted to but they felt compelled to. >> what derailed her election, i would say that comey was one item in that grocery bag of things in the express lane of loss. there was the candidate herself, dissent among the american public, her arrogance, bernie sanders, her arrogance, her voice, her arrogance,

i don't know if john podesta's email about people come plaining about chelsea clinton wassignif. >> whatid was unprecedented, then they disseminated it. they paid social media trolls to disseminate fake news. what we know from our intelligence is that they did this because they wanted to help donald trump. donald trump is going to be the president. there is no disputing that. what i'm talking about is the integrity of our elections. these fights should belong to us. they should be spirited and hard fought. but both parties should say we are not going to allow outside countries to tip the scales. jesse: i completely agree with you. i don't even know if they have elections over there. people have been complaining a long time about president-elect trump, he can't be trusted with this national security information. but meanwhile it's the democrats who were hacked who didn't have a robust hacking defense. now it looks like the intelligence community may have leaked some of the briefings. so trump has been pretty tight lipped. i just want to make sure everybody stops leaking. i hate to see thi

and as part of that, did get access to from what we know how podesta' emails.arently the password was "password" which is something you have to make fun of someone for. he time there is a public service announcement, don't use "password" as your password. they think nobody is that dumb. the hack, though, is a separate issue from trump -- a separate broader issue than the specifics of whether donald trump is going to accept the intelligence community's review of this. he should accept this. i'm a little troubles by this new notion. it was that there was the delegi -- thedelegitimatization. kennedy: if you take that at face value, then you stop looking at everything else. russia is in and maybe other people got in because our cyber infrastructure is so poor. >> they ran with this in vermont. >> they hacked into a utility grid in vermont without having the facts. >> people said it was just a correction. no, a correction that undermines the entirety of the story is a retraction you don't want to retract. it shows the heightened environment for scrutiny of cyber war

part of our policy a full disclosure not interfering with material, we published the -- several podesta emails shows podesta responding to fishing e-mail. now, how did they respond? podesta gave out password was the word password. his own staff said, this e-mail that you received, this is totally legitimate. so this is something a 14-year-old kid, a 14-year-old kid could have hacked. >> you have hillary clinton setting a server in her house which is definitely irresponsible and john podesta using a password named password and telling staff to go into e-mail and monitor along with him and you wonder, sophisticated nation led by vladimir putin is the one who exposed it. they were sitting there naked for anyone to take is what he's saying. steve: a 14-year-old could do it. ainsley: you can catch the show at 10:00 o'clock at night and we will be talking about it every morning. the guy has been there, for four years he hasn't seen his children and he believes in what he is doing. steve: i got your kids some gifts. [laughter] >> good morning, good morning to all of you and ufo's, good morning, serio

podesta's email was password1, spelling, us, using capitals in password. lots to be learned here and thank you for all the efforts to learn it. >> mr. chairman? for the senator and within the public report, in terms of youtube views and youtube subscribers, rt actually has a bigger presence in the united states than the bbc. >> and the bbc is also funded by the government, right? >> senator king. >> well, i will just follow up on that point because this is in the annex to the published report. rt america, millions of views on youtube. 850 million bbc, about 2/3 of that, cnn significantly lower. same thing in youtube subscribers. rt, 450 million. so rt is significant media presence. i think the important point with regard to rt is, that we're talking about hacking. that is how this discussion is characterized but this was a comprehensive strategy involving rt, trolls, paid bloggers, hacking, the whole, the whole package. in fact, general clapper, this is exactly what the russians have done throughout eastern europe for some years, isn't that correct? >> tha

podesta's email 1 with a few spelling variations. so hopefully, lots to be learned here and thank to all of you for helping us learn it. of youtube views and subscribers, rt has a bigger presidents -- a bigger presence in the united states than the bbc. senator blunt: and the bbc is also funded by the government, right? cain: rt america, millions of views on youtube, 850 million. bbc about two thirds of that. cnn significantly lower. has 450 million. so it has a significant presence. the point with regard to rt is that we are talking about hacking. that is how this discussion is characterized, but this is a competence of strategy involving rt, trolls, paid bloggers, hacking, the whole package. in fact, general clapper, this is exactly what they russians -- the russians have done throughout eastern europe for years. shrew.r clapper: that as technology has progressed, the russians have taken advantage of it for this purpose. senator king: i just want to be sure i heard correctly. did you answer the question that there is an investigati

podesta's email were not leaked into october 7. was that intended to be included? >> i would have to research the chronology of when john were a's emails compromised. that bears though, on my statement that our assessment now is even more than it was with that statement on the 7th of october. thank you. in the "wall street journal" you stated that was conscious effort to nation-state to attempt achieve a specific effect. by that, did you also refer to dnc, hack of e john podesta's emails? >> yes. refer to anything else beside those two things? >> to be honest, i don't of that the specifics one particular 30-minute engagement but clearly as i said, what you outlined was part of my thought process. >> and further on in that statement, director clapper, the community says, "it would be extremely difficult for someone chug a nation-state actual ballot counts were election results by cyberattack or intrusion." stated that earlier today as well. that we have no evidence that ote tallies were altered or manipulated in any way? >> that's correct. >> so that's what happened.

i just don't think that, you know, that john podesta's emails, while it was a factor as long as i saycess hollywood tapes and all kinds of other things. that put hillary clinton's emails in there and she was the one that set up the private email server. the big issue who would aprotect middle class americans feeling like they are losing out and they felt like donald trump would do it and not hillary clinton. >> martha: a reflection of the eight years of the prior presidency. the things joe biden outlines is things that any president would have been working on the last two terms and let the people decide whether or not those needs were met. we look forward to seeing you and working with you down there for the inauguration. >> good i quickly say i'm delighted and congratulations for the first 100 days show. i'll be watching it. you'll be the co-anchor with brett and i'll be there too in the inauguration covering. it will be fun with you, martha. >> martha: we look forward to a fascinating few months of coverage of the 100 days and beyond in this administration. thank you, chris. we watc

it also has serious down side and was so much more significant than hacking into john podesta's emails kennedy: you have intent and you have action. russia may have had the intent but wikileaks provided the action. it seems people are abstracting how they feel about russia and wikileaks depending on the outcome of the story which is hypocritical. but great reporting, thanks so as much, molly. coming up, the number of congressional democrats boycotting the congressional nomination. why are liberals so willing to ditch the festivities. there's a lot of places you never want to see "$7.95." [ beep ] but you'll be glad to see it here. fidelity -- where smarter investors will always be. if only the signs were as obvious when you trade. fidelity's active trader pro can help you find smarter entry and exit points and can help protect your potential profits. fidelity -- where smarter investors will always be. >> if you are waiting for inauguration tickets friday, you may be in luck. nearly a third of house democrats are boycotting the presidential shindig. ainsley earhardt asked president-elec

no doubt in my mind that russians interfered, that john podesta's emails were hacked by the russians and not some 13-year-old kid or 400-pound guy and that the dnc was compromised by the russians and it seems pretty clear that wikileaks got it from the russians. it didn't affect the outcome, but they tried to affect our elections. he'll be the defender of the free world. in a couple of weeks donald trump will be the defender of the free world, know in america republicans and price andnk move on. remember when he was asked y retort to that. our lives are built around the idea that we're free people, that we go to the ballot box and we have political contests outside of foreign interference. you can't go on with your life as a democracy when a foreign entity is trying to compromise the election process. so, mr. president-elect, it is very important that you show leadership here. let me say this. if after having been briefed by our intelligence leaders, donald trump is still unsure as to what the russians did that would be incredibly i want to get -- the theycounications with russian of

it also has serious down side and was so much more significant than hacking into john podesta's emails. kennedy: you have intent and you have action. russia may have had the intent but wikileaks provided the action. it seems people are abstracting how they feel about russia and wikileaks depending on the outcome of the story which is hypocritical. but great reporting, thanks so as much, molly. coming up, the number of congressional democrats boycotting the congressional nomination. nomination. why are liberals so willing to achoo! (snap) achoo! (snap) achoo! achoo! (snap) (snap) achoo! achoo! feel a cold coming on? zicam cold remedy nasal swabs shorten colds with a snap, and reduce symptom severity by 45%. shorten your cold with a snap, with zicam. wheyou wantve somto protect it.e, at legalzoom, our network of attorneys can help you every step of the way. with an estate plan including wills or a living trust that grows along with you and your family. legalzoom. legal help is here. so we know how to cover almost alanything.ything, even mer-mutts. (1940s aqua music) (burke) and we covere

email. how did they respond? podesta gave out his password was the word password. s own staff said this email that you've received, this is totally legitimate. so this is something a 14-year-old kid could have hacked based that way. >> bill: they're arguing the clinton team has only itself to blame for the hack. assange said he wouldn't have hesitated to public information on donald trump if he was able to get his hands on it. former dnc official and former assistant to bush. password is password. 14-year-old kid could have done it. blame yourself, no one else, start. >> this is the chicken and the egg. are we more outraged it was hacked or the fact that it uncovered corruption within the dnc? both are unacceptable. but the fact that julian assange said the dnc had absolutely no security is really a shame on them. but we got a benefit by looking into the dnc and finding out that there was corruption there and trying to fix the primaries and other things they were up to to try to skew the election. the blame is solely on the dnc. if they had the proper security like

we lost the election because of podesta's emails. assange, who i don't trust it all, he's right when he said that podesta had no security. >> megyn: if your password is password, change it when you go to commercial. >> everyone has a little bit of truth in this. the trump administration will change the director of the national intelligence office. probably really good because the office has good intentions, and donald trump is being advised by michael flynn, who knows about all this. >> megyn: and democrats will then connect -- >> so therefore he is going to change and punish the intelligence community. i don't think that is the case. everything is getting a little bit too muddled. it is bewildering for americans. some of the changes they are planning to make at the d and >> megyn: so let's talk about i ones for the community. the actual thing that donald trump is a saying which is he's accepting carte blanche that the russians did not hack the dnc. we don't know that. we don't know that. >> you know who else doesn't know that? assan

>> when it was going on, these podesta emails about recipes. >> it was a lot more than that.re was a lot more than that. >> you know what? hillary coasts through the whole election, doesn't work hard enough. >> can i mention, what bob is saying there is a partisan divide. is there a chance for trump to even make any headway with these people? >> i think emotions will settle down. they governing will begin. the governing is going to be hard. >> governing is going to begin? governing by tweet. i want to see the policies. aren't you all excited? >> he said health care for everyone. he said trillion dollars in infrastructure. >> bob, taking care of minority communities. >> if you believe he's going to have health care for everyone? "alice in wonderland." >> he's going to go for that over free-market principles. >> did a wonderful job with the germans. the last of them and said 35% tariff on your cars. there is an idea. >> went to the germans say? try building better cars. >> that would be a good idea. >> i will be honest. >> have a bad morning, -- >> we have to have commercial br

the president is completely upset with the hacking of john podesta's emails and this apparently is notnsidered a offense. abby: time is 20 minutes after the hour. vladimir putin getting talking points from donald trump. outrageous accusation from the white house. >> mr. trump engaged in the industry who is going to help us grow manufacturing jobs in this country. abby: the president elect does it again, the air force one deal that he dropped. that's coming up heather: welcome back, "fox & "fox & friends first", tucker carlson exposing a hoax, confronting a man about fake company that's claim to go send thousands of paid protestors to the inauguration. >> this is a sham, your company isn't real, your website is fake, the claims you have made are lies. this is a hoax. let me start at the beginning, however, with your name don which is not your real name. it's dominic. that's a lie and you know that's a lie. we are greatly supportive of julian assange, edward snowden, peyton manning and we support their efforts to really get the truth out there. [laughter] >> are you pretty supportive of