and track development by affordability on a regular basis then once we gather the data we must prioritize the knowledge of affordable housing to erase that deficit without delay the organizations organized an event eat max presentation of their community benefits package 1979 provision on march evening 3 willed and 50 to 4 people showed up to say we want affordable housing in the midst the myths has seen you market rate housing being built that is destroying the neighborhood of the san francisco so let's get the data and then let's build affordable housing and prioritize affordable housing and maybe let's create a housing imbalance in favor of affordable housing thank you very much. >> is there any additional public comment. >> okay public comment is closed and opening up to commissioners commissioner wu. >> thank you i'm very supportive of this piece of legislation let's get to the amendments so i'm happy to support the change of the annual cycle to march first and september 1st to accept the planning department's recommendations on how to address neighborhood notification groups and to

b will be moved to comprehensively to help move this project forward and cooperate with the prioritization so just before we close up i usually end my presentation an what things have been done and the capital plan committees engagement and choice to ask the agencies to come up with a 5 and 10 year plan in the his/her and the goal to understand where does this city need to participate to match austin all the impact fees the first thing we looked at the plan area and what do we need to support the new growth we're calling that a constrained capital plan a 20-year vision what we will accomplish and put a dollar like no rincon hill like the plans call for overcame we went through an experience matching the projections to summit the impact revenue to have an understanding of the gap and this information will help us to solve the problem one of my colleagues made this graphic that summarizes the market octavia and eastern neighborhoods what that experience reminded in for impact fees across the projects over the next 10 years it's $141 million of that mta rec and park and dph noah funds are eur

a number of people a lot of you think what we can do as as alternative to delay other reporting prioritize this particular item in our work plan so we can move forward with this piece of work and at a separate hearing or perhaps through a memo talk about other reports that are effected with if this type of move there are a number of reports and the delay if we prioritize this is an action to move forward with our recommendation. >> i'd like to introduce a colleague from supervisor kim's office that wants to talk. >> good afternoon commissioner president fong and commissioners april legislative aid for supervisor kim i'm here on behalf of supervisor kim that can't wish here housing fooktd and a stabilization is a top priority as the city continues to grow supervisor kim remains committed to building a city that welcomes newcomers and stabilize the economics we see growing economic and benefits are shared in the community the legislation before you is part of the housing balance discussion that were stashgd sparked that while we continue it build a city pits affordable and respect the neighb

and if we want to ban paid prioritization let's do it in law. that's a fairly straightforward way of solving this issue and eliminating what will be a lot of uncertaintiernity and a certain amount of lawsuits. i look forward to working with you and members on both sides. i hope we can find that title x as you referred to it. sweet spot. all right. i assume that the senators from the northeast are back because they want to ask some questions. can you be very, very quick? ing >>ing withing that suggestion, certainly, mr. chairman. >> senator from massachusetts. >> we'll seek common ground on brevity. >> say that not for my benefit but for theirs. >> i understand. i want to thank all of you for your patience and your perseverance here today. i just want to second what my two colleagues have said that we're certainly going to seek common ground. but i think there is a clear policy that has emerged from the fcc on an open internet and net neutrality and that policy now even if it is the result of a divided commission, is the law. and if it's challeng

and prioritize it.era on that and prioritize it.ra on that and prioritize it.a on that and prioritize it. on that and prioritize it. news reports have come out that taxpayer dollars have been spent by nih on grants examining public health education and campaigns in china. they have used our tax dollars. they funded a grant in california for nearly $7 million to study tobacco and it's link to the tea party. a nih grant appears on the surface to sponsor an advocacy group for lobbying material and a 1.7 million study is under way with our dollars that i think should be going to alzheimer's to see if doing traditional dances such as salsa can spark more physical activity. this is ridiculous. i call upon nih to spend the money that we give you on the diseases that are devastating families and are breaking the bank of our budget as well. we do want to continue to prioritize it and that's why we do fully fund it and i do not support the proposal for mandatory but i look forward to supporting the goals of my colleague. i yield back. thank you. >> i yield the remaining time. >> i thank the gen

appropriates submitted by the bay area rapid transit and with the bus transport muni i didn't prioritization this is an action. >> thank you. we have amber for the policy programming here. >> good morning this is agenda item 6 on our packet for the lifetime it is administered by the transportation commission to support the improvements for low income residents particle those who come out of a transportation planning progress this cycle is the fourth cycle of the programming and its it the agency we're charged with programming $5.1 million bart and sfmta are also charged with administrative review their own transportation funding $6.1 million for mta and $4.6 million for bart this is the summary of the remedies that came out of our committee we are recommending two projects to receive and two not to receive funding the elevation panel used a number of criteria to elevate all the projects they looked at which ones the community identified and the formation plan and the feasibility of the plan and the cost effectiveness and what kind of outreach that happened and also a whole the renditions for

develop a budget for those are things that are needed in order to make this work and how can we prioritizet budget for example, i think fourth on the list was an online booking software that fascinates compliance maybe that and staffing needs to be top priority so what kind of numbers can the department put to those requirement so that budget & finance committee can see where the funding is coming from. >> part of this and part of the enforcement challenge all along 345s has been we didn't know the final form of legislation until late so trying to define the enforcement resources rile depends on what's in the legislation so you know currently, we think that it is going to be challenging to enforce it there's coming legislation that is going to be be heard by the planning commission next month and the commission is considering other changes to the ordinance that makes it easier to endorse that will help with our resources part of the technical do some software solutions to gather information or information from the housing platforms you know at this time it is a software solution scheduling

the energy efficiency savings in in the pg&e portfolio in san francisco and again that's with us prioritizing the small business and the multifamily business owners and this portfolio focuses on large commercial buildings and low hanging fruit so contribute 40 percent of of the savings in pg&e territory here and have done this with experienced professionals this soup represents our credentials again this team and expertise is invaluable. a lot of my team is here today. they are passionate and honest and effective and customers know we're un motivated by profit and we have bilingual staff to engage the multicultural communities and so the department is currently returning running 2 programs san francisco energy watch and the the bayren program. they share a common goal but the approach is different. the san francisco energy watch program has been mostly a lighting program we've run this program since 2006 and worked with all market segments from small business up to large commercial building owners. the bayren program has a more commercial offering this program uses the total estimated energy

a source to prioritization, that is relative to our national security interests. the info we put in addition to the risk is where partners can handle and what they are doing themselves and we prioritize nissan a whole of government agency effort and who can help most in different places. that is what is done everyday at the defense department. >> thank you gentlemen. thank you for your service. thank you mr. chairman. >> thank you. i am now determined the budget gimmicks has no attachment to party, that both parties are capable of using budget gimmicks as we approach the challenges and sequestration in defense spending. it is now being used in the current budget we are debating and the budget that passed the house yesterday. rather than confront sequestration and be honest about the challenges we have in our base budget, do we have all given a lot of time in terms of frederick we are now going further down the road of using a slush fund is not good for fiscal accountability. it is not good restoring faith of the american people that we can face the tough decision

and that's the word prioritize. fine. who will do the prioritizing? you think you can do it here? you proceed crime by crime. no matter what crime you chose you will commit individuals who deserve little and some who deserve a lot. and you can't look at it individually many you have mandatory minimums, i said publicly, i think that's a terrible idea. and i've given reasons which i'll spare you. if you want individual judges to do it always completely, you run the risk of nonuniformity. and we've set up rule commissions, sentencing commissions and mandatory minimums. it's a huge topic is it worth your time and effort or mine to try to work out ways of prioritizing? i think it is. i think it is a big problem for the country. and so i can't do anything more the next minute or 30 seconds or two seconds than to say i like the word prioritize. i hope you follow it up. and i hope you do examine the variety of ways that there are of trying to priority i'd. and then work out one that's pretty good. thank you, mr. chairman. i join my colleagues expressing our appreciation for the work that

we're going to solve today but to make it a priority that we said 6 months ago as we as a board prioritized this issue and i thank you. >> thank you. supervisor yee [applause]. >> thank you president breed. i won't repeat what supervisor mar has

guess it is running through the issues and returning through how long that will take and proposed prioritization on page 7 our sense of based on the commissions disconnection and our understanding and we have this abstraction or technician limitations language at the end is this calendar which gives a sense of where everything in gray staff will be working on the issue and anytime it talks about the intent the commission decide on something or hear something at this point so just unthrough briefly it is sort of in the memo but we essentially had the 4 issues that were voted on the mechanic and prohibition triggered by the prop j issues and getting those foiled with the ethics commission we've identified some the procedural issues and the two that we identified were sort of enforcement policies and regulations addressing some of the streamline provisions maybe forms inspections for any reason violations that sort of thing and the second thing under the procedural it the forfeiture and last day policies that goes book to the august 2008 staff memorandum that outlines the procedures and commissione

such as paid prioritization. and it was those issues that were all involved in that decision. >> let me give you chairman wheeler the chance. there was one of the senators here. i think it was senator johnson, he had asked a question. commissioner pai had answered it. you requested an opportunity to respond and there was not time. do you recall -- >> do you remember -- this is like watching a tennis match sir. i'm not sure i remembered the question. >> i think that was where you wanted to voice you agreement with what i was saying. >> is that -- no wonder i forgot. thank you senator. >> i've got some additional questions, i'm submit them for the record. because of the lateness of the hour. >> do you have a response to this last question. >> >> the previous question. i just want to make sure we are absolutely accurate. quote there is nothing in title two that prohibits paid prioritization, period. >> so let's just quit playing on words. >> moreover the representation of the oral argued was completely misconstrued.

we even go farther on paid prioritization. the fcc was going through some criticism by some of our witnesses out here. full enforcement of authority, it is six pages. the order from the fcc is 317 pages were told to go be a couple of years in court and we won't even know what we have. some fcc down the road will have to change whatever these folks do. >> host: does your bill say the internet is not a public utility country that is the difference craig. it doesn't say that. we limit, we do. we limit their sevens 06 authority down the road. we don't want to just leave the door open to the next fcc or this one coming right through them and using this expanded definition of 706. 706 come when you read it talks about their authority to do anything basically they think would expand access to the internet world. it is very wide open language. it is unlimited authority. we are trying to limit that authorities they don't have a bureaucracy in washington that decides the fate of the internet in a bad way. >> in terms of the authority yo

we have created a prioritization tool to help from work through implementation application to try to change that behavior and institutionalize it as we heard from so many other speakers today. >> so the answer is yes. >> that plays to the enterprise system as well. >> are we going to be changing the name of cybersecurity for critical infrastructure any time soon now of the we have established it is not just critical infrastructure? >> you pose your question in terms of how companies evaluate critical infrastructure within their entities and can the framework be used more broadly and that is one of the discussions we had in the development of the frame work. jesse was saying different entities view it very differently, some entities will treat how they deliver critical services separately. others take an enterprise wide view and are leveraging the framework in that way. the way we talk about the framework is people do it in different ways. you can set up a series of profiles within your organization but you are seeing people using it organizations based on the feedback we were receivi

who will do the prioritizing? you think can you do it here? you proceed crime by crime. i mean, no matter what crime you chose, you will find individuals who committed it in a way that seems to deserve a little and some who deserve a lot. and you can't look at it individually. do you want to have mandatory minimums? i've said publicly many times that i think that's a terrible idea. and i've given reasons, which i'll spare you. if you want individual judges to do it always, completely, you run the risk of nonuniformity. therefore, we've set up rule commissions, sentencing commissions, and then mandatory minimums. a huge topic. is it worth your time and earth, or mine, to try to work out ways of prioritizing? i think it is. i think it is a big problem for the country. and so i can't do anything more in the next minute or 30 seconds other than say i like the word prioritize. i hope you follow it up. and i hope do you examine the variety of ways that there of trying to prioritize and then work out one that's pretty good. chairman crenshaw: i thank the gentleman. thank you. m

we're going to solve today but to make it a priority that we said 6 months ago as we as a board prioritized this issue and i thank you. >> thank yo

except say prioritize. and i hope you do follow up and examine the variety of ways that there are of trying to prioritize and then work out one that is pretty good. >> thank you, gentlemen. >> thank you. mr. rigell. >> thank you, mr. chairman and justices. i join all of my colleagues in expressing our appreciation for the work you do and serving on the court. this is going into my fifth year of serving in the house of representatives and my first year in the house of appropriations and to see this on my calendar and know this is coming up, and as mr. comb acsaid to be an -- womack said to be an honor here. i would like to visit the electronic system, and i suppose, i'm not familiar with it if we go to electronic and i suppose that it is the physical document being received in court and was any of this commercially available and was this written for the supreme court, the software we'll be pivoting to? justice kennedy? >> i can't answer that. the lawyers have available to them commercial systems for filing t

prioritization, create realistic goals, accountability partnerships.ave them some grt people and you ll it other and holdld each other accountablele. >> mlongtime accouability friend. rerebecca: somne i have ied to schele time with. >> we meet everyingle thursday. just knowing i have to reportt into somomebody, that keeps me on task. i i use a tool with my clients and it really prioritizes based on time, money, energy, business. howas this link to our ststrategy. i make my clienents clear off everythingng on their plate excepept for the top two things. we single track them. rebecca: the accountabilityy component is s interesting. she is not in your fieleld, she is a wealth advisor. she doesn't know anything about bidding on government contracts but that is who you reach out to every week to keep you on tra >> our energy is congruent. it is symmetrical. when we want t to connect with other people that will push us forward, we cannotonnect with people who r run at a slower pace than we do. if we look at the people that are around us. the people that are

the ability to prioritize and deal with multiple crises simultaneously. we are also seeing increasing links between isis and groups in africa, including a growing presence in libya and a newfound relationship with nigeria's boko haram. adding to the rising terrorist threat across the continent africa remains plagued by long-standing conflicts that have resulted in long -- large displacements of people and rising instability. it is obvious from our discussion this week in my office that none of this is news to you. despite a growing array of threats, africa command suffers from significant resource shortfalls that impact your ability to accomplish our mission. one of the key components of our efforts to combat global terrorism is the team of men and women in special operations command. the general has said our special operators are deployed in more than 80 countries and are often our first line of defense against an evolving and increasingly dangerous terrorist threat. they defend the nation by training our partners and requiring -- when requiring special

to help manage demand on streets and freeways and finally lane management so different ways of prioritizing freeway space those two later categories are the categories we're focusing on in the study i'll give a couple of example of some of the operational technologies those is an example of using realtime information from san mateo together with caltrain and 2009 and caltrans did a pilot at the showed travel time for freeways on those changeable method times it helped with the caltrain and also the freeways another thing to highlight is mta for instance, recently opened a transportation management center tnc with caltrain and caltrans to manager realtime part of the freeway corridor management passageway package ramp meeting is something that caltrain is implementing throughout in many places throughout the bayer but not in san francisco what this strategy side is helps to meter little number of vehicles into the freeways to improve performances we know that is something that caltrans would like us to look at it will be something to look at some of big strategies that will potentially do th

credential steps starting with the sidewalk planting to a full blown single surface street that prioritizes pedestrians that signals to the vehicles that are a pedestrian priority street second type that we developed was in response to community groups that no everything can undertook a huge street it is time consuming what's the lower cost we've dubbed that as a living zone prototype we're taking a place in the alley that didn't have existing projects and being able to claim it as space for residents to you furniture in a seaman's way but basically creating the space in a low cost way to close to through traffic with the use of elements perhaps gates and here's an example of how it may view over time into a more - so the next steps as i mentioned we have a tool kit it describes design tools and describes process we also have a funding source getting the funding into the hands of the community groups we've 0 gone through a spefkz tailored type of process to the groups that will be revolted out in april of 2015 we have decided that in response to those pro tips with the large capped out at 2

. >> i would like them to prioritize departments over their salaries and prioritize education services in general and keeping certain programs alive. >> on tuesday a group branched off from the rest and chained themselves to cans of concrete on highway 1 stalling traffic for hours. c.h.p. officers had to jackhammer them off. six were arrested and according to others were slapped with a 14-day suspension. officials will not confirm if they were, in fact suspended but i was told students can be held accountable on campus for their actions off campus. >> california students at uc berkeley are expected to rally against tuition hikes and police brutality. like students in santa cruz they are taking part in a 96 hour "call to action," for students across the nation. yesterday students from both uc berkeley and oakland technical high school organized two demonstrations on campus, one to protest proposed tuition hikes and the other to advocate committing more public schools to uc berkeley. >> an oregon company is accused of a number of charges after taking their ingrant from the legal grandpar

that down the road funds the context we're talking about here is that we're putting in place prioritization of how we're going to utilities money this is boiled down to the promise to the investors that buy the bonds we're especially having a way to talk about the bonds that are played in the revenue bonds each of those in order receives a prioritization to a twenty-four hour operation and expense is the next one and the next our debt order service bonds for the folks that buy the bonds and the supportive enterprise has a couple of prior debt issuances they were not debt bonds but their subordinate to the senior bonds we'll be issuing soon and the other discretionary work we do in power so i wanted to point out that everything we're doing about continue as always we can do all the current work but the venture creates the conflict of a different system and want to brought to your attention because this is the discussions with the board of supervisors as it relates to clean power and the concept of a program what this definition requires us should we step into the business line down the road

would that be reasonable prioritizing which companies with the offenders, if you will. >> it comes tohe approach and the enroll setting if only to address issues tracking for gas then we go to potentially companies that are beyond the cooker tractor 2 hundred list and identify those folks and they'll become part of the effort what is before us today is a specific request we engage the companies on the tractor 2 hundred but clearly the board can define the goals that expands the unifies we'll be trying to deal with. >> i mean, i'll be in favor but it 140u7b9d e shouldn't be limited to the list this year companies beyond that how do you suggest that. >> the i f f has a definition of what they cancer climate risk proposals before companies a that might come before a company that wouldn't have the asset to get on the tractor 2 hundred list we'll under level one obviously still be inclined to vote in favor of things more transparent so level one take care of the companies not not on the tractor 2 level if we decide to see a - it would be a manufacturing company that happens to have a clima

justice they have come to the board numerous times and this board in august passed a resolution prioritizing approval of this supplemental appropriation. now this supplemental is cosponsors by supervisor campos supervisor avalos supervisor kim supervisor kim and myself and it was contingent on revenue and saves above the projected estimates of the fiscal year 2013 and 14. the city's comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year 2013 showed a year end general fund surplus of 21.6 $21.6 million that came from unanticipated year end revenue and i think that many of the community based organizations that have been coming to the board the nonprofit workers and leaders of community based groups have emphasized they are a critical part of the statement part of the safety net and the nonprofit sector i believe and with neighborhood stability and efforts to really assist the nonprofit sector, they are an often undervalued and under acknowledged part of our city family in many ways i think they are undervalued and i think they are taken for granted and at times belittled by government and

outreach the next 3 fiscal years and total of $6 million to get completed most of the things that were prioritized we're hoping to get most of those done in the next 3 fiscal years. >> we share the priority. >> we have the level 1, 2, 3 improvements o improvements we'll definitely provide that again and have the data of the years of the traffic data. >> i would appreciate that. >> we'll work with the authorities. >> thank you. >> thank you very much any other questions from commissioners? all right. i guess seeing none, we'll go to public comment on item 5 i have two speaker cards (calling names) >> anyone else please line up. >> i'm ooifshg with the brought to my attention coalition i wanted to touch a little bit about the questions you have and appreciate all the comments and great suggests and ideas just to touch this map we provided was only the 2014 location a 3 year contract i can update this and it didn't indicate when there's more than one class so that means there are 6 classes they're might be 6 in supervisor yee's district. >> i think the locations show a lot of area being served people

the 2014 it was approved last urge and fail to make sure we were funding projects and the key prioritization for the coordination opportunities for the cycles included in the project with the traffic taimg u cadging implementation that funds the design work associated with all concrete bulb out from the san francisco cadging traffic plans that had strong committee support with the sfmta revenue bonds for the construction and the sfmta seeks the funding in june that allows the construction to begin this year anticipated in november the final request from jonathan to speak about the bicycle education classes. >> thanks i'm jonathan with the mta i wanted to take a few minutes to respond to the question last month about the allocation one was the overview purpose of the bicycle education and with the costs of the individual classes so the first one was overall we're trying to accomplish with the black history month has to do with first start the bicycle strategy we've laid out a number of manufacturer to get us one today to a 20 percent of ridership that's within the ridership we've reported to

based on the results of this study, the project will be prioritized and ranked with other projects agreed to based on the parameters. i urge you to support the study. thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, my name is pat valuety no, i live in the south beach neighborhood. i attend quite a few community meetings in our neighborhood and surrounding areas. what i've noticed recently is a lot of talk is about supporting the transportation subway. in fact, our first meeting out of the gate was about the subway and 20 minutes of conversation ensued from that. what i've found going out in the community and talking to people is there's broad based support in continuing this line in getting transit going underground. i think one thing important for us to consider is that we don't live in separate gated communities. connecting neighborhoods is important. extending the subway will do so and it's the first step for us getting there. it's better for business, it's better for the environment and for our neighborhoods. if you think through the number of neighborhoods that are immediately

he's accused of prioritizing image over action.i-doping policy was, the report says, was to give the impression that the uci was tough on doping rather than actually being good at anti-doping. >> there is a degree of denial in certain cases and they'll face what we're facing up to in this report today. >> cyclists have had many so-called fresh starts, but this is another test in the long-running battle to restore faith in a clean sport. >> you can keep up to with all the news all the time on our website, 1-855-730-9674 www.aljazeera.com. >> no other sport can kick off mass emotion in indonesia like football, even if the national team languishes near the bottom of world rankings. >> indonesians, they're really crazy. we can see their ranking in fifa is going down, going down, going down. but every game in the stadium, 80,000 people, 90,000 people. >> even local competitions turn