in general, a criminal offense would put someone in to a priority category, that would be yes. >> in an e-mail ice officials say they target specific violent criminals but we wanted to ask them about allegations that latino communities are being profiled in this. >> this is an area that genuinely in good faith i understand how people can misinterpret it. we have information we're going after a specific cross section what we know has a violent criminal conviction and we had information that they were working at this restaurant that they're talking about. okay, we will scan people in the immediate vicinity because that makes us feel, we want to make sure nobody else is there, but they're only going to be taking if they have one of those mitigating factors. >> just to be clear, by scan he means handcuffed and fingerprinted. >> hand cupped and fingerprinted, there's a laundry across the corner. the problem is ice officers are not permitted constitutionally to create a latino person dragnet and arrest everyone fingerprint and decide who they want to remove. that's exactly what the constit

gets arrested for civil disobedience and protesting ice policies, does that move them into a priority category now that they've been arrested for something? >> in an email, ice officials stated that they target specific violent criminals. >> but we wanted to ask them about allegations that latino communities are being profiled in the process. >> ...to check on a machine. what tells them that an individual is who we're going to check out? >> so we roll up on the scene.... >> just to be clear - by "scan" he means handcuff and fingerprint. >> so people have been out in the parking lot of this grocery store and as they're walking out of the grocery store, handcuffed and fingerprinted. there's a laundromat across the corner... >> the problem with that is that ice law enforcement officers are not permitted constitutionally to create a latino person dragnet and arrest everyone, fingerprint them and then decide who they want to remove. that's exactly what the constitution prohibits. >> no doubt about it, innovation changes our lives. opening doors ... opening possibilities. taking the impossible from

we need we have the issue we have 80 teaspoon talking about shifting of priority but we have lots of needs and we tried to category our needs and balanced our investment in those four priorities and also for us is the urban forestry the lack of staff really another important issue and frankly a health and safety issue for the trees approaching 9 end of their lives. i know you're going to see an improvement and every larger investments in park control >> our need is for how many park control staff. >> the model which will allow us danny what's the number for the park control service area. 50 right >> we have how many. >> we have 15 ftes and this will bring us to 27 and we've no longer be responsible for candle stick so that helps. >> that one concern has come to us repeatedly i see in the budget new items we're expand open which are great but i think we have to make greater strides in that area imwe're all about parks; right? and imthat's our mission. and i think we need to make greater strides in addressing that particular need to insure that we our parks are going to continue to be in good condition, you know, we

category v (unrated) to category iii (contributory) under planning code, article 11; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. ~ california street. >> thank you. and we are joined today by mary brown from the planning department to speak to this proposed landmarking under article 11 of the planning code. >> if i can have the overhead. good afternoon, supervisors. mary brown, planning department staff to present the proposed changes designation of 66 0 california street, the old st. mary's church rectory building pursuant to article 11 of the planning code. the four story building was designed in an early modern contextual style [speaker not understood]. architectural firm skid more owings and merrill and construction was completed in 1966. the building meets article 11's criteria and grounds for a change of designation to a category 3 contributory building. the building's identified and clarifying features include all exterior elevations, the connecting bridge walkways and sustained glass buildingses at the rear designed by mark adam. this change in designation was in

priority. it has to be one of those major bills like all the others. >> one piece is simply, can i afford it? a lot of people especially feel like they cannot. >> right. the. >> second piece, what categoryu think about every month or every year because it's part of your life? or something that you only thing about when you have a formal job. they drop that intimidating pile of papers here's your investment options. sharon, thank you for the report. >> thank you. >>> as chris mentioned earlier, the snowboard slopestyle competition began today in sochi. it one of 12 brand-new events being added to these olympic games. you want to know the others. men's and womens ski slopestyle which is similar to the snowboard where skiers go through with obstacles and jumps. men and female will go for big air, the halfpipe. the biathlon mixed relay is made up of two men and two women and combines cross country skiing and shooting. and men's womens and pairs ice skating will do a combined team score. and women's ski jumping after a pretty long and hard-fought legal battle. the full list is up at jansing yat msnbc.com. look for it. hey guys! sorry we're late. did you run into traffic? no, just had to stop