be doing privying. lifting heavy objects off of a doll and giving iv and turning off utilities. we are building you up to the hand's on scenario. >> what do you do? let's say you feel a tremor and it's going to shake, what are you going to do? all right. 40 people said -- >> where we going to go? >> under a table. >> [laughter]. >> going to be survival of the fitef. fittest. if you have a table go under the table. look above you, what's going to fall. what's going to hit your head. most of the chairs decent. if you are in a movie theatre or stadium what do you do? the same thing. these chairs are not heavy dutiy but covering your head is most important. if it's an empty room go against the wall and cover your head. a lot of cut in disaster heads and arms will get cut. those you can control the bleeding where as the head injury is harder. cover your head, the most important thing to do. we cover, beaware. 15 seconds. in the marina people said it felt like a minute. if you are covering yourself under the table and it's shaking what will happen in 30 seconds? you look up, where's t

even except for some procedural issues, i am privy to these ahead of the public. unless the commission has comments which you are free to bring up, i feel that i can be fair and impartial. >> thank you. please. and >> -- occupies this is located on the northeast corner directly opposite the fairmont. outhis is a nonprofit organizatn with 600 members. the club shares its facilities with many of the other non profits. individuals are eligible for membership regardless of race, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation. despite the fact that this is the most effective of the surrounding buildings, the developers waited until tuesday of this week to meet with the club to share their plans but. this included a photo montage. we were crusted properties -- copies of the planned -- we requested copies of the plan but we are not provided with them. although the fairmont is requesting the construction of a tower that is not allowable, we do not object to them grandfathering their existing envelope. we are prepared to support a new tower but a four-story, low- rise conformin

effectively noticed in that the plans that this couple used in order to redo this house, he has been privy to them, he has seen them, so i personally would be against granting jurisdiction. ]q see anything jurisdiction would provide that we're not going to discuss at the item 10 hearing. president peterson: i tend to agree with that, but have the feeling i might be missing something. i feel like we should kick the decision on this hearing request until after we hear the other case. i also don't feel well and may go home early, in which case we will shut down this hearing because we need a quorum. i should put on the record, too, i used to sit on the northwest of for all heights design review board. i sat on that board for years before i was appointed to this board. i did not hear this case, and my history on that board will not affect my decision on this case. president peterson: thank you, vice president. i tend to agree with commissioners garcia and fung, and that the issue will be addressed in the other permit. what we could do is perhaps move the merits and address that. now -- and add

i do not know if you are privy to when they will be opening up. >> they are open for business. commissioner borden: how did they do on local hiring? do we know? >> we worked with our staff and economic work force development team and came up with what we feel is a very strong program. commissioner borden: great. i notice that in the conditional use of three additional requirements that we are adding here, i would imagine within the bayshore home-improvement specialist history, they will be adding something to that? >> yes, and in many ways, we have added that to the ordinance. first of all, on the general purpose and intent of ongoing work with that is a key goal of local higher, we have added working with your staff. one of the criteria, one of the actual controls is formula of retail over 10,000 square feet should enter into -- thank you -- under -- it was page 5 stating that sponsors should answer directly to an employment contract and policy agreement with the redevelopment agency, which is a stand alone agency, so we have warned that into our control. commissioner borden:

. >> there could well be family dynamics in play that outsiders aren't privy to. his sister never saw this coming. >> even if my mom is gone. he knows the two of us are still here. he's not going to get full financial gain out of what my mom owns. >> your mom said maybe the plan was to kill tu. >> it could be. if he thought he successfully eliminated one and got away it. >> we're talking about the whole idea your brother would kill you, it just sounds so completely off the reservation. >> it does. it's so far-fetched. >> something else that sounds far-fetched. matthew's letter of apology and explanation. in it he said this was all some big complicated misunderstanding. >> i was so scared i didn't know what else to do. i thought i was dealing with a real hitman that wouldn't hesitate to do wig like in the movies. so i made a phony plan to get him away from me. >> there's just something in that that even his mother isn't buying. >> i do love him. i do. he's my son. and no matter what, i will always love him. >> do you trust him? >> at this point, no, no. i don't tru

three, monarchy grants power to the prime minister and privy consul and that power allows either or both to circumvent parliament. four, monarchy is expensive. prince charles and lady diana's wedding cost 30 million english pound, $47 million u.s. the william and kate wedding will lost $60 million. it costs $64 million in u.s. currency a year not including securitiy and lost revenue, bringing the total to the equivalent of about $300 million u.s. for the brits to sustain the british monarchy. the question, is the monarchy, a, a civic blessing? b, the opiate of the people? or c, an atavitvic throwback in. >> all three. right now it's a blessing because they are making budget cuts, there's a welcome distraction to the news with this wedding. for the people, i think it's an opiate. it's like this here, imagine what's like in the u.k. people are going crazy. they even started printing commemorative plates for the wedding. >> do you have any history there? >> yes, i'm a subject of the queen. >> were you a republican? are you a republican? >> yeah, i'm a republican with a small r, definitely.

and often playing them however behind the scenes and wielding influence that we the public are not privy to jim if i can say with you real quick the people that say behind the scenes they want to stay behind the scenes they don't want the publicity they don't want to people they don't want people to know who they are they're quite happy with their influence and most likely their wealth they just want to keep it that way they have their front people you're saying in a way. right well there are there and the profile of today's new power brokers top power brokers turns out in many ways to be. he's someone who performs these multiple overlapping roles across fields that are not fully disclosed and sometimes what he is doing is very visible it's out in front it involves a whole p.r. campaign or a whole p.r. machine and other times we we don't know and we can't know what's really going on so it's really both it's of both worlds the behind the scenes and also the branding the message for the public is is a part of it sometimes you're right they don't want us to know who they are but very often

have to understand if they want different cout comes from some of the broken promises they have been privy to over the years, if they vote for my opponents, first of all, nothing is going to change. i think with all of the disgruntled voters out there, that they realize that i have also gotten over a million votes in an election that.s0 had never been done before either. there's a chance to make history on tuesday. if voters really realize getting back to the founding principals of respect for individual rights, of a limited constitutional government, more freedoms and liberties for individuals to be able to control their own lives, those are the thing that's are important to them, things that have historically worked and that's what they're concerned about, their choice should be john monds. and that's a choice they should feel good about. that's why i think my message has been resonating and i think on tuesday we're going to shock the world with the results. >> thank you, mr. monds. our final question in this round is orlando montoya's question for roy barnes. >> mr. barnes, the georgia

marked sects and you negotiate with karzai so why are they really are these tanks and i'd love to be privy to pentagon materials to be a fly on those walls without the insider knowledge i can only come to the conclusion seems that the military here is admitting the after nine years they're still failing admitting that when it comes to road side warfare despite all of their technologies their attempts at creating mine prove vehicles they're losing out to the taliban and their i.e.d. so one thing these tanks will do is keep troops on the roads safer make it easier for them to battle insurgents to win the war i think. if you were a condom what type of condom would be i know that it sounds like the start of some barbara walters interview but really it's a question being asked by the washington d.c. department of health to the district to set up a rubber revolution website and i'm being serious when i tell you this the website really has this bizarre kind of seventy's vibe to it you can even take a condom quiz there it is to find out what type of condom you are and then it allows you to post yo

obama administration says this is under the privy of the federal government any way. >>> what can youell us how long this proceeding will take and when we might get a decision? >> it will last an hour both sides having a half hour and we don't know when we will get a ruling, three judge panels of the ninth circuit work in their own mysterious ways we don't know when there will be a ruling. they have the 90 day rule in state court system where they have to rule within 90 days but federal they can take as long as they want >> i was reading online this will be televised they are allowing cameras in. >> yes, for some cases in federal experiment using cameras in the courtroom civil arguments, any kind of argument before the 9th circuit can be televised if there is enough request for it or if they decide to allow it to be televised this is in the different from the trial court where we had controversy over proposition 8. they have agreed to allow cameras in the courtroom because of a strong interest in the case and c span and others will televise the argument. it is very very dry if you are

i'm not privy to what the status is of these discussion. secretary gates, chairman mullen and others and to some extent general petraeus, that we need to keep the pressure on the taliban more than we already are, change the dynamic on the ground more than it already has in order for them to feel the pressure enough to finally come to the negotiating table. >> how much a part of that is what we learned in nato, lisbon, the transition of forces are going to be taking place over a series of several years, the end of 2014 the target date. this just felt like a little bit of writing ling out of the initial july 2011 -- >> i don't know why it would, savannah. we've always said july 2011 was not us exiting afghanistan, it was the beginning of the condition to drawdown forces. >> you know everyone short-handed it getting the withdrawal and different officials admit something different to all -- some say it was wholesale significant withdrawals, others saying not so much. >> anybody that follows this closely knows the afghan war was not going to end

and they've been having all these conversations on my book shelf that i have never been privy to, and i'm excited to be able to join in that now. so i attempted to explore the topic of propaganda from three perspectives, the first being theory. i have -- the largest part of my collection is is books which are not prop propaganda in themselves but which explore how it's created, why it affects people and often how to avoid its effects which, i think, is is certainly very interesting. the second, i have historical primary and secondary sources of propaganda or books which address particular pieces of propaganda and then, finally, i have another large selection artistic and literature which deal with the topic of propaganda such as 1984 or darkness at noon which i feel is is an underrepresented look at propaganda as art and how art can inform how we attempt to persuade and look at our political is and social lives. >> thank you very much. now, don't go away, let's give him a hand. that was wonderful. [applause] arthur, would you like to -- [inaudible conversations] [laughter] [inaudible

>> i'm not privy to all the facts that the committee has. i will look forward to their decision and i think the congress will abide by that. again, they are the fact finders and they have been charged with coming up with the recommendations as far as, you know, punishment and then i have to look forward to what they do. they are basically the judge and jury and they make the decision as to what the penalties should be. >> let me ask you about what happened over the last couple days and with the democrats choosing the same leadership that was in place before. and you know what the critics have said, congressman. they say this was a vote from the american people about change. there's nothing to indicate that the democrats have gotten that message. there were some people, especially some who, frankly, did not win re-election who had some very pointed and emotional things to say about nancy pelosi in the meeting on tuesday night. she did win re-election or election, i guess, as minority leader. but do you think that having the same leadership in

>> i haven't been privy to that. norm may know. >> yeah. they are talking aout their own sort of first of all adeptation of the you cut plan. they are will advice from callers and listeners all around the country. they are clearly not going have a paygo that includes revenues. how in the end you reconcile that with the desire to reduce deficits and debt remains a big question on the table. it's a question that has now been brought into full relief. as have some of the full issues of medicare and social security. alan simpson and mr. bowles have put things out there that are creating discomfort in both parties. >> and you raise your -- well, we have someone here now. >> hi, i'm julia mcdowell, i'm the editor of the college of american pathologist. can you talk about how you see the new congress dealing with the physician payment sgr issue? >> well, i'll take a crack at this. this is one of our top priorities to reassure seniors that they will have continued access to their physicians. and we certainly hope that the lame duck session will tac