it began in 200719 years after prop two passed. as reported in this extract in my new article there is no motion of april 29th. memo documenting the loss of 200 hospital beds between 2002 and 2020 with old two prop two harings with a total of 150 beds how did you lose the other 136 sniff beds without public front q hearing santa monica the minutes under report d hp failed to provide needs analysis that you requested eight years ago there is no mention of what turned out to be the secret city attorney advice to you gutting prop two by aborting issuing a single finding prop two requires you to issue. the minutes say nothing about the second and third resolve clauses rs and failed to report you have imposed a six month deadline to dph to provide you with eight year passed due sniff needs analysis there is no dph advice you april 29th quote any redugs for sf beds is in san francisco and likely to have a detrimental impact there is nothing about the sniff closure will be detrimental the analysis warned you twice the minutes failed to wa

k fund for prop a and prop b fund to good use the sfmta has constructed island for the prop b funds around 4 7 and 10 avenue the light rail vehicles are underdevelopment we were pleased to participate in tour of the media event hosted by sfmta to share the latest finds as you recall the transportation authority approved hundred and $59 million to help the sfmta to replace the fleet with the bus we're hoping to fund and represent 9 single largest allocation in the 25 history of the salesforce program muni is for be efficient and greener and expands our capacity so we're happy to make that happen and finally on june level 11 we executed a program to have resolving credit for the direction from the board last month thank you cynthia for a 3450g9 transportation tra transaction as well as our bond peabody llp financial advisors as well for the tremendous work and as a bonus the moody raised our credit if a to excuse me. double a two to double a-1 and moody cited the diversity as well as the management of the program so thank you very much to moody and such we reaffirmed the ratings of ou

this ruling could reopen the door for prop 8. >> reporter: the u.s. supreme court work were to rule against gay marriage, then yes, those against same-sex marriage could try to bring back prop 8, which if you recall is a california ban on same-sex marriage that vot voters approved back in '08 before it was knocked down in 2013. what the supreme court is considering now is the legality of marriage bans in four states. kentucky, michigan, ohio and tennessee. it's possible that the justices could rule those bans unconstitutional effectively forbidding any state from banning same-sex marriage and making gay marriage legal throughout the land. or the supreme court could lead this issue up to the individual states to decide. and as i mentioned, possibly reopen the fight for prop 8 here in california. as it stands, 36 states

us through a waiver of the prop k strategy plan policy i want to expand make sure that the ta policy is on matter large dollars amounts in all cases that was not brought before us the $33.4 million for the procurement of 40 foot buses and hybrid buses also, this is a large item you have to expand waive through street trees was part of that item and again brought up by cca members and the public was the lack of city policy to expand maintain trees up to date a two or three year period and get going to the property owners i hope the board of supervisors can work towards getting addressed and finally one hundred thousand dollars district 9 around the a medicine island looking at public safety and bicycle safety through the area and one i personally brought to expand supervisor campos a year or ago as a member of the neighborhood association excited about getting improvements to expand help with the bruno heights neighborhood and all people in the bay area neighborhood on item 5 the potrero hill neighborhood transportation go remember jackie sacking thought to bring back the bus services

seeing none, this will be important any public comment on item four prop k fund allocations? >> 3 copies the 3 people for taiwan vikings one chinese two weeks chinese copy donation transportation land use according to expand the 5 thousand land use is a life force parkway. >> all right. thank you for mentioning transportation in our comments. >> is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on item 4. >> hi, i'm back again jackie sacking remember the cca a driver i know wants to expand know why you're give all the funds for bike lanes and this sort of thing especially on alameda boulevard he lives in the area only one bike he's seen on the bike lane why you want to go forward that lane is not being used it is near a freeway and very unsafe for everybody so i just want to expand know where mta or the transportation authority got the information if and why this is one lane that this is one project that like the only one in the last couple weeks only onecyclists public comment is closed. seeing none, public comment is closed. >> sxhieshgs. >> i want to thank the staff we

he raised $17 million for props 1 and 2 and the most recent go around and $42 million for prop 30. the largest don't is $1.5 million. one of my concern is for voters to discern or keep track of these various contributions. for example the 1.5 contribution for californians to restore and protect public safety and schools. a broad coalition of teachers, businesses, laborers and law enforcement and the governor. it was a 1.5 contribution to a jerry brown committee but from a voter you have no idea where it's coming from or where it's going to. i think you have that spreadsheet in front of you. there is some variation between them. the smallest one was the proposition e committee that raised $5,000, $15,000 the prop b committee in 2010 that raised $1.1 million. the largest donor was $72,000. there is a lot of variation. there is one in the mayor's name a multi-measure committee. the thing that we have in common is that top donors give a lot of money. the largest to the mayor is 64,000, a donation to prop d in 2011. most of the donors give more than $500 the majority would exceed the co

and i think when prop 8 came to be, it woke us up and said, wow. you know, this really hurts when people talk about us this way or it really, you know, who are they to say these things about our relationship? you know, we have six nieces and nephews. we are the cool uncles. we are not going to hurt any children. we are not going to recruit any children. so this prop 8 bout initiative that was out in california, it really made us think about who we were and where our relationship was ultimately going to go in this process of coming out, you know, when you see, when you are gay and lesbian, you have these moments in your everyday life where you have to come out every day, whether it's at the grocery store or the bank or a hotel desk. these are moments that you learn to cope and you learn to, oh, god, do i want to make this person uncomfor theable by telling them i want a king-size bed for me and my partner, not my business partner but my life partner. this is ongoing circle of coping and coming out. >> but ongoing, also, is the journey of millions of

i wanted to ask about the passage of prop c, childrens fund and public education inretchment fund. i wonder-and theectionpansion of preschool for all and additional affschool program, what are those are on top of what we passed for prop c as voters acted last november? >> thank you for the question for vieer mar. let me clarify, which of these funds are these funds included in the fund and p fund and which are gineral fund resources? >> i know that the percentage of the set aside for the childrens fund increased so there are increased funds and voters really approved those, i wonder what in aadditional we approved with prop c is added into some of these different buckets? >> i would have look at it more clear claesly to give a exact answer, but the broad answer is generally these items that are highliteed here whether it is the after school investments or summer programming for all or the expansion of preschool for all to all 4 year olds or the acceleration of that, those are all investment made as a result of the passage of prop c so they don't reflect further investments beyond t

the state board didn't file with the elements in the meantime as you stated we also reviewed their prop 39 request for next year and felt based on the information they initially provided and the enrollment trespassed their alike to have ada in the district of kids in their school next year however, they filed a writ in superior court seeking a judgment seeing u saying we have to provide them space and at gloria right direction davis i mean we've offered gloria davis to kidnap high school and we mediated them to move in part to move webster so in the discussions with general council at the time that appeared that we didn't know licking we were to prevail in court and how quickly we decided to make an office to neglects. >> what happened if we deny that if we vote to not gave me in the su a - >> so as part of the facilities disagreement with sf wax they've agreed to dismiss their pend writ and each party will walk away assuming their own cost if you approve that within the document i would be happy to advise you to the explore of liability but if you choose not they've demonstrated they h

is great to be here today serving on the san francisco full board of supervisors from 2002 to 2006 prop p passed we have the first mcd in 92 which i was sitting open the board it was part of san francisco life worked to legislation to support the industry to make sure that you know patient that needs it had access when i got elected to the board of equalization i was asked to sit open a task force together we represent 43 of the county and from what is happening it was the first time i got invited by terrance allen to get more involved to see what is happening to go to humboldt to do a tour it was shocking we live here in san francisco and live in a bubble and get outside and start to talk to stakeholders and growers and sellers and distributors and transport oversees there's life people in the industry even though prop 215 passed years ago we have not passed one bill regretting this industry i want to give kudos to the industry for setting up the framework that local government has stepped up to the plate in with the state not passing legislation where we're talking about legalization

k that is in prop k f that doesn't have fund since i worked on prop k we'll have to expand go before the voters again to expand extend prop k so we can finish what we started but we have to expand remember there's a gear light rail project still on the back burner still needs to be built it is supposed to be light rail ready if we have it does board halfway it is not light rail ready so take into consideration thank you. >> thank you very much any others is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on item 8. >> bay area two thousand 40 2 thousand 20 this is 72015. >> this morning everywhere in san francisco there are people 28th i mean the mayor allow 40 govern and the u.s. want, of course i was too young see but 20 years the mayor 2025 to be governor of california. >> sir any other is there any additional public comment seeing none this is an informational item so move on to item 9 a introduction of new items. >> colleagues seeing none this item is open for public comment for new introduction. >> yes. this is the point i made before regarding the bike lane on alameda boulev

. >> prop 8 was before the court a couple years ago and the attorneys opposing prop 8 at that time said there's a fundamental right to marriage and they chose not to go there, the supreme court. instead, they kicked it back on sort of a legal technicality that the proponents didn't have legal standing to bring the appeal. why do you think -- like what has changed? why are they now saying, yes, there's a fundamental right to marriage. >> i don't think anybody would disagree that there was a fundamental right to marriage although the standing argument on prop 8 was designed to allow strategically for the country to come up to speed. since prop 8, state after state and circuit after circuit has said -- and the windsor case -- you know, at this point, the court is not ahead of the curve. at this point the court is endorsing what most jurisdictions and people have already endorsed. >> i was just going to say i completely agree with that and just in the two years since doma, the central court of doma was struck down and prop 8 died even though it was on a technicality, not only have we seen a

the increased crime rate from prop 47 but the increased crime rate since prop 47 only 19 people have been released from the county jail unless they have been busy they cannot account for the increased crime rate you can't mram 47 for the increased crime rate nor can you use it -- >> thank you very much. next speaker please? >> good afternoon supervisorer my name is kevin karl the directive ho tell from the san francisco we employ 20,000 in san francisco i one of those that work in san francisco as well we strongly suggest to look at the staffing we have been working with the police officers to get more beat on the streets i have to commend the police officers they have worked with us because it's a request we have been working with us for a while that would help to get at that fine solution so we can have officers on the streets that can make all of us feel safe not just our employees and residents but the guests and our hotels we have advocated for additional officers so our hotel guests can can feel safe ear one of the things we wrestle with daily they tell us they love our city th

and as i mentioned, possibly reopen the fight for prop 8.tands 36 states including california allow same-sex marriage. this ruling expected any time, at any moment now. the high court also expected to rule on obamacare. specifically on whether or not the federal government can provide subsidies for medical insurance in 34 states. a ruling against that could have a profound impact on the affordable care act. reporting live, bob redell, today in the bay. >> thank you, bob. we're watching for it as well. >>> police in fremont want you to be on the lookout after women reported seeing flashers last week. one woman told police a man exposed himself to her in the parking lot at the gateway plaza shopping center last thursday. two days before that another woman also called police to say she was flashed near gateway plaza. police searched the areas after the reports, but no one was arrested. police say the incidents are likely not related. >>> a tragic accident or a homicide, right now police aren't saying. on saturday they were called to a home on d

in may of 2009, a lawsuit is filed in federal court seeking to overturn prop 8. in august of 2010 in the federal trial, chief u.s. district judge vaughn walker rules prop 8 is unconstitutional he stays the ruling white the case continues. february 2012 the ninth u.s. circuit court of appeals finds prop 8 unconstitutional on narrower grounds, the stay stays in place. in june 2013 the supreme court voids the ruling on prop 8 saying backers didn't have legal standing to appeal the ruling. two days later same-sex marriage resumed. there have been at least 18,000 same-sex marriages in california to date. >> i remember san francisco and other counties made the switch when you have to write out for the marriage license. it says spouse one, spouse two. >> the situation has changes over the years. wonder what's going to happen with gavin newsom and all this, and it happened. >>> they had celebrated small victories all along but everything we're hearing from people is that this is a big victory. there's no going back. >> i don't know this feeling. i don't know what it is.

and those who backed prop 8 attacked the case for that and they attacked you personally. that had to sting a little bit. >> well, perhaps it did sting a little bit. that was a fact that was widely known in the legal community. of course, i did give consideration to my personal situation. there are gay judges. and, um, there is no reason that they cannot handle cases touching on those issues in a dispassionate way and an objective way according to whatever the facts of the case are and in accordance with the law. >> judge vaughn walker tonight. check out the live look at the white house tonight lit up in rainbow colors in support of today's same-sex marriage ruling. you can head to cbssf.com for more on today's historic ruling. find celebrity reactions, local leaders opinions and a full rundown of events for sunday's pride parade in san francisco. >>> well, when you think silicon valley, you probably think of big tech buildings, right? coming up, how the last recession helped create an oasis. >> the homeowners were away. so someone decided to "play." they weren't very disc

participated with record number thofz public in the 21 annual bike the work day which is funded with prop k sales tax dollars. [inaudible] showed bikes accounted for 76 percent of all inbound traffic on market street between 8:30 and 9:30 a.m. many culleges joined mayor lee and san francisco bike coalition at city hall and their own executive director [inaudible] saent photo showing [inaudible] this week as well the central subway project celebrated a mile stone. the contractor for 1.4 mile twin tunnels for the pauject completed work. the final element of the contract including 5 crass passagess and head walk [inaudible] and construction pit. the photo's looked great. at a total cost of 251 million there work was completed on schedule and within budget. work on the stations continues with revenue service anticipated for december of 2018. congratulations to mta and entire project team. i would also like to take a few moments to recognize the [inaudible] authority staff who will be retiring next month after 16 years to the service to the agency. as you all know lee is deputy director for ca

. >> as our new commissioner the process that we use for prop q.resolution. we do not act on that draft resolution. leave the discussion open for the public to submit testimony and have a second hearing at this. with this type of dialogue being sort of fruit for the further crafting of the resolution. your comments about what you might like to see within a resolution, would then beñ?ñ? crafted and a revised resolution would come forward and then we would debate that one. we're not suggesting that -- as a matter of fact we would not be passing a resolution today. >> in terms of possible suggestions at this point, would be if we were to look at the first resolve, the closing of the two beds will or will not have a detrimental impact. perhaps in the short term on the community. we realized the specifics of this particular case. we realized we really need to study these transitional care options. every time i back up resources into higher cost hospital beds, it cost everybody dollars. but also it's not good care when people can be taking care of less r

a number of issues primarily about impacts to air quality, noise, parking, wind ab compliance with prop m and others appropriateness it addresses each appeal and the comment letters none of the comments or appeal warranted a restriction to the pmd, however the planning department wants to addressing add text under actions by the board of supervisors as i will read into the record incorporate approval of a funding application to the board of state and community corrections and authorize the execution of agreements including the krufshgs and finance agreement the board of supervisors to approve the funding application and the execution of certain contradiction and the constitution for the final project if i'll allow me to highlight some of the issues raised by the appellant and the pmd comment period first, the appellant asserts the proposed project has a significant impact related to parking noise, air quality and other tops, however, those assertions are speculative and based on a miss characterization of the project the appellants concerns related to the adequacy of the analysis for th

project on turk is previewed with no affordable housing this will involve many of the developers - prop k is a city policy for affordable housing for new housing we need more affordable housing in san francisco especially in the tenderloin it is your consideration of the low income recipe we ask the commissioners to reject this and on turk. >> thank you, ma'am your time is up. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i'm a resident of tenderloin for 15 years and board member of the filipino-american community association we would like to ask the commissioners to reject this proposal the 3 61 turk and leavenworth in the company it will not provide 20 percent affordable housing to low income people in the tenderloin and the development has not done enough outreach to the community and been unrelying willing to provide affordable housing i've lived in a community outreach to - i've lived in the senior housing for 15 years and i will be living in san francisco without the affordable housing i am concerned it if this proposed project for no affordable housing unit this is - >> thank y

and possible action on commissioner president keane's vote and recommendations for the rewrite of prop j and the restoration of the commission oversight of the ballot measure for upcoming elections and attachment commissioner president keane's report and draft for the lobbying ordinance i think the most recent draft of our proposal is circulated whether or not with our agenda? okay so commissioner president keane i'll ask you to report >> thank you, mr. chair in my report itself it pretty much sets out the history of what we've done since the last meeting you've appointed me as an ad hoc committee recommending to two matters whether or not prop j should be rewritten in different enacts with the ballet this year, and, secondly, whether or not we should put together a regulations of expenditure lobbyist i'll submit it to the ballet this year as said in the report with my discussions with the chair the chair and i came to agree that the effort was two big to do all of this this year we couldn't do it to have it on the november ballot so in regards to prop j that is put off to another day