provides.during the most recent -- there was a statistic cite d in the shelter monitoring committee report's about tokens not being available and i remember that day when they visited because the person usually visits glide twice a day because we have two shift. she got the flu in the afternoon and came back another day. we had a substitute reservation clerk because one of our reservation clerks was ill and also h.s.a. was the person we contact there was ill and that was a statistical anomaly. and h.s.a. is very accommodating and if we get near running out of tokens, we send staff to the site with tokens or pick them up at meetings. so i can speak for glide it that's very, very rare when tokens are unavailable. >> supervisor kim: thank you. you can pull down the mike. >> hi. i eat me again. and i have probably more than two minutes to say, but overall since last fall, things are better because people have complained and i do understand it's new management and there was an existing corporate cul

provides. and they provide more training than in the categories but for the purposes of the shelter monitoring committee, we focus on these 10 categories. which include prevention precaution training, hand washing, and communicable disease prevention, proper food handling, emergency procedures, including but not limited to c.p.r., intervention and harm reduction training, interaction with clients who suffer from mental illness, requirements under the a.d.a., the shelter training manual and culture community. and those are the areas that we focus on. >> so currently the department of -- currently the department of public health will deal with the shelter programs developing training modules that focus on the fire trainings and we're working with half to identify and to make it helpful for shelters to access the information and to utilize the trainings. we're also advocating for funding to meet the training requirements within the standard of care within 2011 and 2012 fiscal budget including main

when you look at the ability of what would be provided through that net working to provide additional data on a voluntary basis to tsa to assist in the risk assessment, that allows the focusing of resources and screening technologies on those we know the least about and in the long run, that will serve to reduce costs. you may not need suite of technologies available at every single screening lane. you could have certain lanes dedicated to those who the least of which is known. >> i could not have said it better myself. >> the whole goal of this is to provide the most effective security in the most efficient way. and the efficiencies we can achieve through this process like spending less time physically screening pilots who are in the most trusted position, that allows more efficiency at the checkpoints. that is what we are trying to do here. >> the only thing i would like to add is pretty remarkable when you look at the numbers, 628 million passengers going through these checkpoints. it is an incredible job tsa has done every day and they don't get a lot of credit. there is a lot of

we have provided financing before. it is a lot of money. so come and talk to the office of small business and make sure you have professionals and task inspectors and contractors lined up so that we can be part of that conversation in terms of helping you maintain your business and helping to stay in business despite the fact that a lot of businesses are being regulated by now. if you have questions, my information is in the packet. we are more than happy to field any questions, but again, because there are different parts of this whole saga, we are all in different parts in terms of financing, but the loan program will be available. it will be available until the ada compliance issues are no longer there. >> thank you. any questions? [inaudible] we do have legal expertise and individuals with our mayor's office of disability. if you do have any questions at all about things that you might have heard about or issues you are facing, it might be the opportunity to ask questions. any questions? >> thanks, supervisor. sorry for being late. i he

i would be glad to provide a list, and i would be glad to provide the revenues that we get from the extension fees, but the extension fees just keep the permit alive. it does not pay for the work that was anticipated originally. >> in the words of mr. commissioner lee, at least the level of information should be provided to us so that we are not talking globally in a way that we can now get into the specifics. >> i would be glad to. it is the. it is very deep in terms of the statistics. -- it is deep. we need to make sure we do not get into a situation like we have been in, which is having money if the economy stalls or if we have a major occurrence. . >> i understand that, but if we could at least make a reference to understand where we're headed. i want to reiterate the comptroller's office does look at all that we do, and they are annualizing -- analyzing the whole information for deferred credit. faugh to go right to have a question. -- >> if i do have a question. should we be encouraging them to do their billing faster, or is this standard procedure? >> it is standard. when you are non-p

i will tell you when i read it and many members read it and provided me with comments to provide you, it struck them that there is a sense they were trying to do it on the cheap. why would these people worth hundreds of millions try to cut corners on mitigation for impact to the environment. it seems unnecessary. on land they seem to rely primarily on signage and educational efforts. they will have to do more to protect the dunes and the wildlifes. the water relies entirely on a brochure. they don't provide any other means for mitigating what we know will be direct impacts. we already lost 40% of the open water bay habitat since we have been developing it. these birds deserve better from us. we are not against the project. we want to help plan it. but we encourage the city to take our comments seriously in order to avoid delay. >> thank you commissioners. i am the deputy director of the golden gate national park conserve eans. this is our strong conviction that the america's cup organizers must assure that the public use and benefits of this national park are treated with great care a

and also provide a list of benefits to the community stakeholders.at there are endless possibilities for larger corporations and small businesses to provide reciprocal benefits to each other. especially in an area that is rich with community resources and significant challenges. they encouraged and exchange resources and provide significant benefits. i also want to add that i currently served on the mid market had representing an organization that services and small business in the mid market area. there of the larger companies moving into the area. can you talk a little bit about that? >> i would hope to see reciprocal benefits. supervisor kim: to be more specific, you have a good relationship and a strong sense of small businesses in the neighborhood? >> i think the small businesses in the neighborhood are really kind of special and distinct from the small business in other parts of the city because of the challenging landscape. how have a lot of the same concerns -- and there is like a different level of expertise and what their challenges are. yo

they can be child care providers so our clients can go out and work. >> we found more and more women of child bearing age come down with cancer and they have kids and the kids were having a horrible time and parents were having a horrible time. how do parents tell their kids they may not be here? what we do is provide a place and the material and support and then they figure out their own truth, what it means to them. i see the behavior change in front of my eyes. maybe they have never been able to go out of boundaries, their lives have been so rigid to sort of expressing that makes tremendous changes. because we did what we did, it is now sort of a nationwide model. >> i think you would be surprised if you come to these clinics. many of them i think would be your neighbors if you knew that. often times we just don't discuss that. we treat husband and wife and they bring in their kids or we treat the grandparents and then the next generation. there are people who come in who need treatment for their heart disease or for their diabetes or their high blood pressure or their cholesterol

we provide that service. we also have services provided by experts in assisting property owners in questions they might have. so this is just a list of those agencies that we interact with and it's some very great larger number of individuals and some of which we have brought here today to assist in the question and answer session. and this is just barely scratches the surface and representative of that which we provide. so now what we're going to do is move on to that portion of the session where we're going to highlight those areas in this green checklist of things that we have encountered and things that we want you all to think about as building owners and occupants as far as developing a good maintenance plan to keep these buildings safe and functional for you, for the building occupants and the greater community at large. with that, let me introduce again senior housing inspector andy cars who is going to talk a little bit about that. . >> good morning. again, welcome. thank you for coming. as miss bosk

as i said i commit to providing full, timely intelligence information

and we also have to provide our reasons for our agreement or disagreement with each one of those. before we do that, i do not know if there is anyone that wanted to add anything? before we go into discussion, why don't we hear from members of the public that would like to speak on this item. please come forward. >> thomas picarello again. i also want to thank the san francisco civil grand jury for their work the entire year. not only on this report, but for their reports on the ethics commission, and also the report on the controller's office regarding the whistleblower program. with all due respect to this committee, colleagues on the full board, it is unfortunate that the civil grand jury is the only entity in the city doing any oversight on your city departments, city agencies, and cbo's. you should read all of your civil grand jury reports and follow their recommendations. these are average citizens, some lawyers, some school teachers. they have no agendas, they have no political constituency, and they're giving you sound advice. thank you. supervisor campos: two minutes that

those are funds owed to the city, providing more land than the seller is provided to us. therefore, it is not quite an even exchange, but the agreement calls for the payment to be made by the llc to the city. supervisor chu: thank you for the presentation. this item does not have a budget analyst's report, given the no impact to the general fund. why don't we open this item up to public comment. is there anyone from the public that would like to comment on this item? item 12. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we send this item forward with recommendations? without objection. thank you. colleagues, can we take a motion to rescind the vote on items nine, 10, and 11, so that supervisor kim can vote on these items? without objection. on items nine, 10, and 11, a motion to send these items out with recommendations. can we do that? thank you. item 13. >> item 13. resolution expressing the non- binding intent of the city and county of san francisco to comply with part 1.9 of the california health and safety code, recently added by assembly bill 27, for the p

if you submit items to the committee, please provide them for the file. supervisor chu: thank you very much. please call item no. 1. >> item #one. ordinance amending the san francisco administrative code sections 12r.5, 12r.7, 12r.16, 12r.17, 12r.18, and 12r.25 to -- enhance the office of labor standards enforcement's enforcement of the city's minimum wage ordinance by clarifying agency access to places of employment -- require a policy to resolve complaints or initiate enforcement actions within one year -- raise the penalty for employer retaliation -- impose a penalty for failure to post minimum wage rates -- provide for posting notice to employees upon commencement of an investigation and public posting of employer non-compliance, and impose penalties for violation of these posting requirements -- impose a penalty for failure to provide employer's name, address, and telephone number to employees -- allow for back wages held in escrow for an employee for three years or more to be used to enforce the minimum wage ordinance or other laws enforced by the o

the president, at that time in 2009, suggested we needed to provide tax incentives. we think we can also use streamlined regulation. we can do more to bring the insurance industry into the cybersecurity equation. what we need to do is get organizations to invest more in cybersecurity to go a step that is frankly beyond what is demanded by their corporate commercial interests and reach a security level that is the national interest, and those are different things. >> host: gautham nagesh, the hill newspaper. >> guest: thank you. now, you spoke about the private sector's reaction to the plan. the white house has taken great pains to cast this proposal not as a regulatory model, but as a collaboration with the private sector, but we have heard criticism like from melissa hathaway who said there's not enough private sector input. were you firms contacted? how much input did they have in the formulation of the plan? >> guest: unfortunately, we had virtually no direct involvement in the development of the administration's current regulatory proposal, and by the way, the ti

people who are already medicare providers about 1.4 million providers.ut we have done is we've hired a contractor to help us with that. we have put automated application so that people can come back and give us the date of information, like going places, physical locations, all the things that help us determine whether you are legitimate provider. we party starts on this recertification of a plan to have 100% of the community either completed in terms of recertify were significantly underweight they january 2013. said there is very specific project grants in house and program integrity was once before that it dvd. we've done something like 25 newsletters and articles for the provider community. we've been doing open reform to say this is coming. this is what we need you to do to work with them. and after going through this process of recertification or just in general, if you find a provider who is not legitimate, can you expand on how you perceive them or how you work with the department of justice as they have been fraudulent and what type of penalties

policyholders, should a combative the provider? -- it come out of the provider? i understand that today is more common for those provisions to be included. that is one of the ways we are studying this. i do not know exactly how we get at these underlying costs. as state regulators, we have an opportunity to get at these costs. trying to look at, can we influence that provider, and that might be an interesting place to look. i hope that is helpful. >> are you looking at things like readmission rates, for example? we know there are some hospitals that are doing a great job in keeping them low. others do not. when you have all of these readmission rates, who bears it? policyholders? i hope you are also looking at readmission rates. >> part of what we asked the actuary who performed the study is, let's look at everything. i do not want anything to be off the table. if there is a way for us to make a dent in those costs, we want to do it. everything is on the table. >> i compliment you for what you have done. itt set a high standard for insurance commissioners around

at the same time we provide new trees that are more appropriate to the area. because right now those large eucalyptus drop on to the tennis court right a bit. and again one has fallen across the tennis court and one has fallen on the street. it's one of the houses you can see in that image. here's the new playground in yellow and the new tennis courts in green. . there's the location of the old tennis courts. commissioner harrison: thank you. >> we do have public comment. ashley hathaway. >> good morning, commission. i'm here basically as a representative from the glen park association board of directors. of which i am a member of the board. as park and recreation co-chair. you-all have a copy of our letter in support of these improvement plans. both for the trails and for the general park improvement plan. we just as a board want to reiterate that we support. we are generally in support of these plans. however we do recognize there are some community concerns. which we have tried to state as clearly as possible in this letter. some community concerns have sor

the impact report was also provided. committee had additional questions and clarifications in response to committee members around expenditures and in low use for staff retention. that occurred in spring of 2010. i want to refer back to those questions and clarifications by the oversight committee. this happened in may of 2010. >> the purpose of this committee is to ensure the proceeds from proposition k are extended for the purpose described and to inform the public concerning the tax revenues. we wanted to remind the public what the intentions of this measure our, to actually go through the list that was given in the ballot when this measure was passed, so i will quickly go over those for the record for the public. the proceeds of this show be authorized to be used to strategically raise the salaries of teachers so the district can compete with other districts, to provide additional compensation to teachers who work out schools with high teacher turnover, provide additional training for staff, including a child develop

we need you to provide us information. we will provide you with information, but from the user perspective that creates some risk. because now you may have data about user activity moving back and forth between private companies and the government without any kind of real independent oversight. in that relationship, we have said there has to be consideration of the user, of the consumer. host: does the white house ever security address penalties? guest: they do. in a way we do not support. part of the agreement to get the information from the private sector over to dhs is to immunize the private sector companies that are disclosing information about their users from any liability. if you are a user or a company, and that is not the subject of criminal investigation, you might wonder why your data ended up at the department of homeland security. the only way you would have to us that some change in that practice would be to bring a lawsuit. so the white house immunizes those companies, which is similar to what president bus

cannot provide that level until october? >> no, we have 13 now that we can fill, that will be filling existing position that would have been requisitioned for last year. for this year's budget, we will not be able to hire any of our anticipated requisitions that we were allowed to hire until october. and just so that everyone knows, the tjpa, their big project, i just signed the purchase orders for those yesterday. those will be coming in in september. we have staff to cover the plan check on those. so we do have staff to cover any and that --

we knew we needed to provide these anyway. what we needed to do is see what level we needed to provide to the people and customers. we have an issue where it says one thing -- it is not contradictory, but the screen that says that you do not need to pull a ticket for this instance, but we need to make sure we have it somewhere that is not just on the q-matics screen. the idea is when this rules out we can be successful, and that everyone it looks -- that everyone looks good. there are many things that need to be done. this will take a while. we're hoping that we get more people that are willing to spend an extra five minutes to go through and start from the beginning to pick their tickets up and go through the process. >> commissioners. >> questions about our reatreaco the testers. what do we tell these people? what is the intent or benefit? to go the first thing i wanted to do was to make sure that they understood that they are testing the routing system, and that we wanted their input and suggestions. we have on lonly gone t

provide shelter services with the ada act. the provision of accessible sweeping, bathing facilities. reasonable modifications and shelter facilities and providing information to new clients which includes rules, how to access case management services, and made available to clients through the use of large print or asl services. this is focused on the lack of the nile or access through the auspices focus on the lack of the nile are accessed through this is -- this is focused on the lack of access or denial. not accommodating the client's request for special meals. >> can you talk about the last one? >> this requires someone who is disabled and they require a tray of food brought to their table. the health and hygiene category, this refers to 11 standards of care which focus on meals, access to toiletries, and stock first aid kits. in this category, there was 39 separate complaints including allegations of mold. a lack of protective equipment for staff. the facility and access category, this is probably the largest category that

and provide services. hope stands for helping ourselves pursue enrichment, and we're a recovery, wellness, and reintegration center. we currently have a volunteer program, which we have about 17 active veterans who are involved in our program. there are several areas where we focus. we focus on life skills; we focus on behavioral health prevention and promotion. we focus on health and wellness; and we focus on prevocational support, all in a peer support model. and all with the idea that these will increase overall socialization and reintegration back into what might be considered normal society. so if, you know, once a marine, you're always, exactly, right? creating that environment of trust, you know? when i was in the service, i was a squad leader and a team leader at the time. and the one thing i could always do is sit down with my group, with my team, with my squad, take a knee and say, "okay, what are the issues going on that we need to address in order for us to, you know, carry on?" it's very simil

the way we provide assistance to women veterans is, foremost, is ourselves. so as women veterans, we're connecting with the other female veteran and trying to help them figure out which is the best approach to solve their problem. and then, when you pick up the phone, if you've been to afghanistan ... i've got somebody who's been to afghanistan. you want to talk about iraq? i've got three iraqi veterans. you want to talk about the vietnam era? i've got one of those. you want to talk about desert storm? i've got a gal that's done that. a couple of us were at kosovo. we actually have online support that's available 24/7. anyone can become a friend or family member of grace; you do not have to be the veteran. it's anonymous registration, so that you are able to blog. there are some phenomenal, fascinating, heart-wrenching stories that have been posted on our web site, where women are for the first time feeling safe to talk about something that happened to them years ago. we don't know where they live, we don't know what their name is, but we can give them the an

us information, we will provide you with information. but from the user perspective that also creates some risk because now you may have data about user activity moving back and forth between the private company and the government without any kind of real independent oversight. and in that relationship we've said there has to be consideration of the user, of the consumer. >> host: does the white house cybersecurity proposals, do they address penalties for privacy breaches? >> guest: they do but in a way, actually, we do not support because part of the agreement and the proposal to get the information from the private sector over to dhs is to immunize the private sector companies that are disclosing information about their customers and users from any liability. now, if you're a user or a customer of one of these companies who's not the subject of a criminal information, you might wonder why your data ended up over at the department of homeland security, and the only real way you would have to effect some change in that practice would pro

the rfp has been provided. we would have them provide that for comment. we would see that work. i say this with the caveat that i have received communications from the advocates and consultants that the entire region that if the $390,000 is not funded, they do not want to do any work at all. supervisor mirkarimi: let's call the elephant in the room. i am also an advocate. this is where i come from in this regard. whatever the relationship is with the advocates and consultant is an intimate relationship. it is one that is often wielded -- has wielded leverage on the spotty thinking it has to be an all or nothing relationship between a consultant and this body, too. i do not think that is clear or accurate. at some point, we have to stand up and say that on work product itself, at a cost, we want to make sure we're getting the best we can for the dollar we're spending. i think that level of service needs to be maintained. the quality control needs to be insisted upon. >> i want to put some context to this. let me say this. the way i have approached the term sheet and build our and

. >> item 6d, update on disaster coordination unit and in the update provided. -- any update provided. >> good morning, commissioners. ed sweeney. i would like to bring tony greco and that grain to talk directly to you next month, but i can give you background. the disaster coordination unit, we had this during the lay off about two or three years ago, that was one of the casualties. we restarted it two or three months ago. we put two or three people in there, tony greco and that grain. -- and matt green. we have policies and procedures written, but they are three or four and sometimes five years old. they are cast with rewriting all of that. there also cast with the plugging into the city family. we had one meeting yesterday with the department of emergency service, and they want to know and the event of an emergency what was went to happen, who was going to take care of the buildings, and they felt that when an earthquake happens within five or six hours they will be tasked with hohousing fr a great number of people. before they are allowed into the building, one of our staff member

all will have to provide more text. in our presentation to the commission, we will do that to clarify some things and make sure we are not leaving the ambiguous statement mentioned earlier, being more specific about that. president o'brien: anybody else? during the outreach, were there any negative comments from any party, in the neighborhood representative? >> by far, most people have been very supportive. there has been some questions about what the change would do two specific neighborhood commercial districts, and i have for -- and they have worked hard to maintain a certain image in their neighborhood. we are trying to reassure them that our intent is not to get rid of those controls, but just to make it -- someone said micromanaging. cannot micromanage how business operates so much. president o'brien: it is not an action item, necessarily. >> it is not an action item. if there is any comment or suggestion you want to direct to the planning commission as they hear it on august 4 -- will the legislation be ready by