of them show sightings of how this group is transitioning from a sort of sue toe state that -- pseudo state that governs in iraq and syria into a more traditional terrorist organization in the mold of al qaeda. islamic state has been facing pressures on the battlefield. they have defeats and not just in iraq and syria, but also in libya. and so this tasks of governing their self declared caliphate in iraq and syria has become so onerous they're traditioning into a more al qaeda like group where they're launching the street attacks in this cafe and this airport behind me here in in instanbul. >> covering not only the attack there, but also putting in context there what is unfolding. we want to now cross over to bangladesh. we're joined on the phone, claiming editor at the tribune. he's been up all night, it's good to have you with us. i know it's been a long night for you and certainly for the people in bangladesh. what can you tell us what is unfolding now with daybreak. what is the situation there, describe for us what is unfolding as you see it or as you've heard about it from your source

pseudo scientific fraud, end quote. according to research done by greenpeace the foundation stated in a 2005 policy brief that i quote, a greenhouse gas reduction policy would have only costs and no benefits. in 2005 the foundation released a public policy statement titled "global warming policy: north carolina should do nothi nothing." whose author wrote similar climate denial pieces in the franklin center affiliated carolina journal. it's hard to keep track of all these crisscrossing. in 2007 the foundation released a policy report titled "a north carolina citizens guide to global warming" whose author according to facing south was a visiting scholar at the -- yes -- koch-backed american enterprise institute. that report falsely declared that consensus on climate change does not exist and declared -- quote -- the greatest threat we face from climate change is the danger of rushing into foolish and costly policies driven by ill-founded climate change hysteria. art pope figures and jane mayer's book "dark money" as a -- quote -- charter member and a long-time friend and allied who shared charles koch's passion for free

states publicly owned, then they hand it to private companies without charging anything. they say will do that but we require politically that both sides be heard so you don't get some pseudo- fascist taking over. at this stage of the media, who would you trust? >> say all of a sudden your friend donald trump was elected president and he was in charge of the fcc and they were responsible for administering the fairness document. >> first i would pass a law that is a non- tweet and non- bias. you ask a good question. anytime government gets in the business of content judgment, it's a problem. it's true. publicly owned, one side dominates and technically, under the law the fcc cannot have one more the majority of one party so if seven members, you can have seven democrats are seven republicans. you can only have four of one party in the next person has to be not of your party. this is imperfect because you point someone of your party who is really believing in the other party. at the moment, we have to figure out a way to do something because right now local media, thousands of people are being canned by the electronic media and print media and they're all going to national s

of moving forward asking me to pick between the states that i wish to be ruled eligible under or my representatives. and i certainly don't want to re pseudo-government organization any of my private information that i so zealously guard in the first place.e. so i would speak, i'm speaking against the enemy that is on the screen as well as the underlying amendment. thank you, madam chair. >> thank you. that you would recognize the gentlelady from new mexico. >> madam chairman, i call for the question on the amendment to the amendment. >> i'd assumed you meant previous question?heard. >> yes. >> all those in favor of closing debate on the amendment to the all those opposed nato. the ayes have it. we will now move to consideration of the amendment to the event. all those in favor of including the information that you currently see in green on your screen, if you're in favor of adding that language please seer aye. in the opposed nay. the nays have it. we will now move to a vote on the main motion. if we can get it back up on then screen. do we have other people who would like to be heard on the main motion? >> for purposes of the amendmenl t

is the united states, true to our pattern, thinking short-term and tactically, not strategicallies in the short term there may be advantages of having erdogan there as a partner or pseudo the long term we are seeing turkey being led into being authoritarian islamist regime it if not a outright dictatorship. membership in nato very problematic. strategic important very, very great. and once again even angela merkel is on the wrong side of this because president erdogan is not democratically elected by our standards. when you ban your opponents and ban the key opposition parties that's hardly democracy. so, again, i may never get to see sunrise over the golden horn again. may never get to see the mosque and gleaming in the sunlight. i don't care i'm on the side of the coup because that is the side of turkey of secularism and legacy of atakurk and true democracy. erdogan is a true thug. >> getting word members of turkish parliament reached by phone tell reuters they are hiding in shelters at the harlment at this moment u.s. officials said u.s. personnel and citizens in turkey should stay in place. update family and friends of theirs status. secretary kerry speaking with t