, and can that be presented to the public because i think that's very vital information for the public to have. thank you. >> president mazzucco: thank you. any further public comment on items not on the agenda? >> you're about to go into closed session, and for me, i'm wonder when do those records become available, and when will i be able to get a copy of those? i just feel like -- the other thing that i'm concerned about is these officers, they got this little black stripe, and it seems like they're covering their badge numbers. i'm just concerned about that. i went to a protest, and it seemed like they got sunglasses on, these hats, and then they got their badge numbers covered up. it just feels like they're just hiding out. i mean they're packed, and they got a big group of people, and they're hiding out from the public. >> president mazzucco: thank you. any further public comment? it's now closed. in response to your questions the officers are wearing the black stripe over their badge in mourning for the california highway proffer who we honor in our meeting. it's customary for al

so public records i think should be amended to add or 67.24 after public records act. obviously with the correct statutory language. okay. is there a motion to adopt as amended the definitions and language in decision point 1? >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye. opposed? what is that? >> we already had public comment. opposed? hearing none, that motion passes. the next issue is decision point 2. i had a few proposed revisions here as well. under 2-1-a. this may seem nit picky, but i think it might clarify issues a little bit. under "b," i think it should read, willful violations of city officers and city employees. other than elected officials and department heads. is that accurate? because we have the and city employees at the end currently. and i found that confusing. >> would you restate what you would change it to? a-2? >> yes. this is a-2 little "b." you know what? actually a probably better way to do that is to put the other than elected officials and department heads in parenthesis. i want to make it clear that we are talking about different sets of

(inaudible). >> next, public speaker, please? >> public comment is now closed and line item number two, athrough d. >> please call the next item. >> number four, whether to hold item five in closed session and to assert client privilege with regard to 55. code section 67.10. >> this is public comment on whether or not we are going to have a closed session, police discipline matters that are protected by the supreme court as well as pending litigation, public comment, mr. heart? >> san francisco, open government, i said this last time and i will say it again, thank you for turning on the microphone after i started speaking. i don't trust you father than i can see you. in fact i don't trust anything that you do in open meetings, because you really don't follow the law and you ignore the law and somebody brings it to your attention and you simply ignore that too. and yet you ask us to trust you that you will go into a closed session and you will only discuss the things that are listed there. i don't believe you. and i think that the

general public comment. >> the public is now welcome to address the commission on items that do not appear in the agenda but are in the subject matter of the commission. the speaker shall address to the commission as a whole and not to individual commission. under the police commission rules of order during the public comment, commissioners are not to respond to the public or make a right of response. the police and personnel should refrain from entering into discussions during the public comment. please limit your comment to three minutes. >> public comments? >> san francisco, open government. on the overhead, i sent you the copy of the constitution of the united states which i feels compels to bring this to a commission meeting. members of the public who are listening, this is a copy of the current agenda and as you see, there it says as most city agendas do, know your rights under the sunshine ordinance. what we have here is an order of determination, dated march 1, 2011 against the police commission. and i will read it in part. findings of fact (inaudible) law, judging from the testimo

why don't we open it up to public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this same house, same call. the item passes item number seven. >> allocate $1.3 million in proposition k funds and amend the relevance by-your prioritization programs. supervisor campos: is there any member of the public to it like to speak on item number seven? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this same house, same call. the item passes. item #8. >> allocate $19 billion in funds to the san francisco means of transportation agency for the central subway tunnel construction. supervisor campos: is there any member of the public to it like to speak on item number eight? i think we have one member of the public. >> a good morning, again, commissioners. i'm on the citizens' advisory committee. on the third street light rail, i'm on the citizens' advisory group representing the transportation authority and when this item was brought before our committee, i voted to have this move forward. i did the same thing last week at the plans and programs committee. i hav

er is there any other public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are on item 4, general public comment, at this time, members of the public may add rez the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission and that do not appear on the agenda. with respect to the agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. i would like to call chris borden. >> hello, everybody. i am not a speaker, i am a roller skater in golden gate park and i enjoy that very much plus i'm an expert skater, i've done a lot of research and studied skating and urban recreational sports activities. my philosophy behind it is it's difficult for people to succeed professionally and their self-confidence takes a big hit on that but you can go do sports and build your self-confidence and feel really good about yourself. i think that roller skater is one of the few sports that's done by men and women equally, old and young and it's a really good sport and

the reality is this public-private partnership is 100% private, and 0% public.n fact, it has reached the point where this board of supervisors can no longer just look the other way, as both the city librarian and the library commission have done for years. mr. chaffee's been talking to you about it for years, and not one of you will look. and if this is the way public-private partnerships run in the city, we have a major problem. >> president chiu: next speaker. >> hello. my name is vivian imperiali, a city worker speaking as a private individual on my own time. not all of you have been aligned with ross on the political front. now put that aside and vote based purely on what is fair. the manifestations of your upcoming vote have taken on epic proportions. this is no longer about ross. no matter what you think of him personally or politically, the process has been a travesty, and an assault on democracy. ross was judged by commissioners appointed by the very officials intent on removing him. that is blatantly a setup. the opponents poll is designed to elicit ant

any members of the public that wish to speak on item number 1, seeing none, public comment is closed.colleagues, do we have a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation and to authorize the clerk to make those amendments? okay, we have that motion to amend and we can take that without objection and to the item as amended, can we send the item forward with recommendation, we'll do that, thank you. >> item number 2. >> ordinance providing revenue and property taxes at a combined rate of 1.1691 on each 100 dollars valuation of taxable property for the city and county of san francisco, san francisco unified school district, san francisco community college district, bay area rapid transit district and bay area air quality management district and establishing pass-through rate at 0.0810 cents per 100 dollars of assessed value for residential tenants pursuant to chapter 37 of the administrative code for the fiscal year ending june 30, 2013. >> thank you, i believe for this item we have jamie whit >> mr. witikur. >> this is for fiscal year 2012-2013 to a combined rate of 1.1691%, this

please note that public comment is not allowed on those items which have already been subject to publicard committee. if members of the public would like a document to be displayed on the overhead projector please state such and remove the document when the screen should return to live coverage of the meeting 3-6r7b89sd why don't we hear from members of the public. they shall have up to two minutes unless you are translating your comments into a second language. first speaker please. >> ms. angela calvillo, our supervisor, my name is abdul um gay. i am here to tell to each one of my family, welcome back. i hope you have enough time, one month, at least you can study -- what my county, what my city needs on the future time. the only thing has been different, john, he have white hair more than me now. -- [speaking foreign language] ladies and gentlemen, as american -- native, i am very glad to see that our country, back home, egypt, have a new president. his name is mohammed -- i hope he have courage and he have strong action like me, to return each penny, each dollar that our former pres

public comment. >> yes. less lethal weapon is very clear to us, who have been tasered before, as i was, is deescalation. >> president mazzucco: nis general public comment on items that were not covered. i apologize. so we can't talk -- >> okay. i just want to commend briefly on the fact that -- a lot of -- command about the chp officer who tragically died this week. and i find it disgraceful. you might be surprised to hear me say that. but the loss life is always tragic and we mourn along with you. >> president mazzucco: thank you. for public comment, items not included. >> again, i didn't get to say what i wanted to say, but everyone knows who i am. i'm back again. august 14 of this year was my son's anniversary of his death. i've been fighting for the last five and a half years. and this is something i'm going to be doing for the rest of my life. i don't know what else to do. i still have no justice. i still have no closure. all i want is a little bit. something needs to be done. it's not just about my son

the bottom line for the complainant and us is that the public records that the public has every right to obtain are produced. and so i think the regulations should be clear in addressing this most usual, i would say, type of matter we would send to you. where we just want your help. to get this information. regardless of why it wasn't produced. because often we don't know. thank you. >> okay. i think there were some good points raised by the public. i think let's take them in chronological order than order of presentation. section g, the complaints. i understand the concern, we are not saying that a task force referral is meant to suggest that there is no, that this is just merely a complaint. as if it were initiated by the commission. however, i do some concern. i know that complaint is relied upon throughout the document. if we change the definition, i think we could do some, wreak some unintended havoc on the rest of the document. and substantively i don't think it makes a difference there. when we get to referral, we can deal with it in that section. the other issue, the superviso

seeing none, public comment is closed. * on the madam clerk, can you please call item number 4? >> item 4, director's report. this is an information item. >> i will turn it over to director moskovich. >> good morning, commissioners. my report is on your desk. i would like to highlight a few things. first of all, we thank you, mr. chairman, for highlighting the importance of the round table we just had. as i recall, you also stressed the importance of making effectively the connection between land use and transportation positionses and the importance of establishing, really opening a dialogue between both the planning commission and the mda commission to ensure we are moving those items in the future with a clear path to implementation. on the federal front on just a couple days ago, congress before adjourning for the november election recess, passed a continuing resolution that funds the federal government to march 27th and unfortunately it did so without accounting for the inflation factor that is built into map 21, the n

let's open it up to public comment. if there are members of the public that wish to speak to this item or the motion to continue. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor wiener has made a motion to continue these items to october 23. that motion has been seconded. can we do that without objection? without objection that is the case. madam clerk could you call items 32 through 35. >> clerk calvillo: 32 a public hearing interested in the planning commission 2012 conditional use authorization to allow childcare facility doing business as alpha kids academy. item 33 is a motion approving the commission's decision approving the conditional use authorization. item 34 is a motion disapproving the commission's decision and item 35 is a motion directing the clerk to prepare findings. >> president chiu: this is a project in district 7. i'd like to acknowledge the supervisor from that district, supervisor elsbernd. >> supervisor elsbernd: thank you. similar to the last item i will be making a motion to continue this one

is there anyone from the public comment that would lieb torgm speak? public comment is closed.out objection. we're moving this to september thank you. thank you, supervisorx3?cx ola, c @&c"x please call item 4. >> alisa miller: ordinance amending planning code to permit existing gasoline stations cx on 19th avenue to provide a mechanical car wash >> chair mar: so, it looks like supervisor olague has left. so we have to present,mu planning department,> aaron staffer from the on july 12, 2012 the planning commission votedj-ws 6-0 to recommend approval of the ordinance with modifications. the 86k;+red ordinance would allow existingc service stations of a certain size located on 19th avenue from lincoln avenuerr& boulevard to provide mechanical, with conditional use authorization. >> supervisor mar: we have i was going to ask if she has any introductoryd(:,>p)ks. >> i'm sure you will cover a lot of what i will mention but i'll it is appropriate to allow the intensification of useqm-yá certain sites, that are of a certain square footage, and already serve this l

seeing no more public comment. public comment is closed. can you please call item seven. >> item seven is future agenda items. >> colleague any agenda items for future consideration? any member of the public wish to speak? i think the speaker spoke towards this already. >> chair. >> sorry when you're done with public comment. >> public comment is closed. >> we have a future agenda item and it's happening today and it's your birthday and i wanted to wish you the happiest of birthdays today. >> thank you very much mr. fried and thank you very much. no singing i don't think. if we can please call item number eight. >> item number eight is adjournment. >> thank you very much. meeting adjourned and congratulations to mr. campbell and have a wonderful weekend.

seeing none. >> we're on to item number 10, adjournment. >> public comment is closed. >> public comment is now closed. is there a motion to adjourn? >> move to adjourn. >> second. >> are all commissioners in favor? >> aye. >> we'll now adjourn the meeting. it is 11:50 a.m. close the meeting with a moment of silence for james mccrayv senior. thank you. we're now adjourned. [adjourned]

we should probably take public comment. >> any public comment on this matter? seeing none, a public comment is closed. >> i have some notes on specific references. the majority of the commercial districts are rezoned, leading to typically a ground level commercial space underneath three or four residential spaces. with the financial pressure and ceiling heights, they are between eight or 9 feet, and there are some other comments i referenced, but do i have to mention to make a recommendation? >> it would be great if you'r ne key points. >> noting that commercial spaces feel cramped, it varies from various neighborhood commercial districts. gooi think in order to encourage ground floor ceiling heights, perhaps no more than five additional feet should be used, because i think in certain neighborhoods this could be a problem. considering these recommendations, i motion this be amended, too, for the staff work to address future legislation to address the five does foyt increase in all commercial district. good -- thought would also increase and all -- in all commer

are there any other members of the public that wish to speak in general public comment? seeing none, general public comment is closed. madam clerk, could you go to the adoption calendar. we have one item there. >> the clerk: yes. the single item on the adoption without reference to committee calendar item is item 26, a resolution finding that the city through its office of labor standards and enforcement has established and will enforce a project specific labor compliance program in accordance with the requirements of the labor code for all public works projects funded in any park from proposition 84. >> president chiu: colleagues, roll call on this item. >> the clerk: on item 26, supervisor mar, aye. supervisor olague, aye. supervisor wiener, aye. supervisor avalos, aye. supervisor campos, aye. president chiu, aye. supervisor chu, aye. supervisor cohen, aye. supervisor elsbernd, aye. supervisor kim, aye. there are 11 ayes. >> president chiu: resolution is adopted. at this time why don't we go to our 3 pm order related to washington. >> the clerk: 22 and 23 comprise the

is there any public comment? seeing, none, public comment is closed. we are on item 9, commissioner matters? >> don't see any. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are on item 10, new business setting. >> don't see any. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. item 11 is communications. is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, we are on adjournment. item 12. >> so moved. >> moved and seconded, all those in favor? >> aye. >> thank you very much. >> thank you.

seeing none, public comment is now closed., because it's time for members of the public to comment i really try not to restrict comments people make but there needs to be a general sense of cordiality and respect accorded to members of this room, whether they sit on the board of supervisors or members of the public that apply to serve on behalf of our city. i want to reiterate that. i really try not to sensor comments that are made because it's the right of the public to speak but i hope people are careful in concentration of what they say and really take time not to insult one another or make mispronunciations of things that have happened. i don't know if there's some comments i have on supervisor campos on the roster. i wanted to address one issue around the city charter which supervisor wiener pointed out to us regarding the sunshine task force and there was general consensus among the board and our city attorney that the task force violated the city charter and it came up with the previous appointment for the member of the

seeing none, public comment is closed. we have a motion to send these forward with recommendation. we will do that without objection. thank you very much. item 3, please. >>the clerk: resolution authorizing the office of contract administration to enter into fifth amendment between the city and san francisco and en pointe technology sales. >> thank you. would you call items four and five. >> item four, resolution authorizing office of contract administration to enter into fifth amendment between city and county of san francisco and xtech to 67,890,000. item five, resolution authorizing city office of contract administration to enter into third amendment between city and cct technologies contract limits to $34,460,000. >> thank you. for these three we have bill jones. >> good morning, supervisors. bill jones, office of contract administration purchasing. today i'm here to request your approval of these three resolutions for amendments to the technology store products contracts with computer land, en pointe and xtech. with y

i am from the department of public works. from the previous hearing there were questions relating to how the notification who is this is based upon different type of permanence -- permits. in this case the code was very midpoint of the block, and it was from the bases but made a determination to grow without side of 300 foot radius -- the grill was outside the 300 foot radius. there were questions whether it was two under 98 feet or 306 feet. goothe department says it is toe measured from the midpoint of the block. we have nothing to add except but we follow our process based on the requirements. >> did you see the information provided by the requester? >> no, i did not. that is why i am trying to figure out what they are referring to. taiex i just want to get confirmation -- >> i just want to get confirmation it is not a communication from your office with respect to this issue. >> i see it now. it is from the board of permit appeals. >> i wanted to get out on the record. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing n

seeing none. >> we're on to item number 10, adjournment. >> public comment is closed. >> public comment is now closed. is there a motion to adjourn? >> move to adjourn. >> second. >> are all commissioners in favor? >> aye. >> we'll now adjourn the meeting. it is 11:50 a.m. close the meeting with a moment of silence for james mccrayv senior. thank you. we're now adjourned. [adjourned] >> hello, my name is jamie harper. in this episode, we are featuring the park locations in your very own backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in san francisco with someone special. golden gate park's largest body of water is this lake, a popular spot for strolling and paddling around in boats, which can be rented. created in 1893, it was designed foreboding and -- for boating. it is named for the wild strawberries that once flores. a pleasant trail follows the perimeter past huntington falls, 110 foot waterfall. two bridges connect the trail to the island. the climb to the hills summit, the highest point in golden gate park at more than four hundred feet. you can get quinces of the western side

members of the public may address you on items of interest to the public that fall within the subject matter jurisdiction of this commission with exception of agenda items. the public may not address you on an agenda item during this category; however each member of the public may address you up to three minutes each, keeping in mind the entire category has 15-minute time limit. >> patricia voy, neighbors of merchants. a group of us from different organizations had a meeting just to catch up on what's going on in the neighborhoods. we discovered there is a lobbyist that in north beach and on polk street both went down, formed a bogus neighborhood association in order to get their approval through. i want you to be very careful of who comes up to see you because it's happened twice. if anything comes up as a new business district of such and such, be careful on -- i discovered it after one of my merchants came to me and said they were busy in a meeting, real busy in the restaurant. people waiting until they are busy, then they say sign this piece of paper. to get rid of them they sign

let me open it to public comment, and seeing none, public comment is close.i would like to ask if anyone would like to approve this as worded. taiex i would move to approve. >> do we have a second? >> i second. >> any objections? seeing none, the motion is approved as is. >> that motion passes, 5-0. >> next item. >> item 7, directors report, update and report on the office of small business and small business center, updates on the apartment programs, update on legislative matters, and make an announcement regarding small business activities. >> good evening, commissioners. we have had a busy couple weeks. good i am sure you are aware of the fire that took place on ocean avenue last week, and a total of nine businesses have been affected. three businesses were housed in the building where the fire started, and that building needs to be demolished, so they will need to be relocated. since the mayor launched the initiative, he is asking all the city departments and would assist in this matter to come together and work out plans to help the property owners ease

seeing none, public comment is closed. public comment is closed.adjourned. supervisor chu: welcome to a special meeting of the budget and finance subcommittee. do you have any announcements? >> please silence all cell phones and electronic devices. completed speaker cards and copies of any documents included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the july 24, 2012 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. supervisor chu: thank you very much. would you call items one and a wheel? >> item 1, ordinance amending the business and tax regulation code to enact new article 12 a-1 to impose gross receipts tax and gross expense tax on persons engaging in business activities in san francisco, amending article 12 a to reduce business payroll expense tax rates based on the amount of gross receipts tax collected under article 12- a-1, and in the current business registration fee to generate $13 million in additional revenue. item two, motion ordering submitted to the voters and ordinance amending th

the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's office of neighborhood services. you can drill down in the neighborhood and get where the newest hospital or police or fire station. >> we are positive about gis not only people access it in the office but from home because we use the internet. what we used to do was carry the large maps and it took a long time to find the information. >> it saves the city time and money. you are not taking up the time of a particular employee at the assessor's office. you might be doing things more efficient. >> they have it ready to go and say, this is what i want. >> they are finding the same things happening on the phone where people call in and ask, how do i find this information? we say, go to this website and they go and get the information easily. >> a picture tells a thousand stories. some say a map >>> welcome to the regular board of supervisors meeting. i'm supervisor chu, avalos, our clerk and we have jennifer low and scott wisema

cost of trying to maintain the standard set by the public. we may become more official -- more efficient if this comes up again. i think there is also a lesson in this that a mayor would act very carefully in using this tool, because there are extra- legal considerations -- public reaction, press considerations -- that would also mitigate against overuse, or at least suggest caution. i will cut to the chase. for me, i would find official misconduct under option two. i think there is significant relationship between the standard and the duties of the office. i may be reading the case a little bit differently, but it is partly the same with commissioner liu. when i said the law was different than it was, it means the addition of part two must mean something, or the voters would not have revised to add it later. there you are. commissioner hayon: i am willing to support option two, a somewhat more narrow definition, for the reasons you have advocated. i appreciate all of the thought and effort you put into the thinking behind all of these option

public comment? >> there is no public comment on that item. >> move to uphold the order of abatement and hold it for 30 days and assess costs. >> thank you. >> just a moment, i'm sorry. [pause] >> if there is a motion and a second, is there any public comment? seeing none, do a roll call vote. president clench? >> yes. >> commissioner lee? >> yes. >> commissioner mar? >> yes. >> commissioner mccarthy? >> yes. >> commissioner mccray? >> yes. >> and commissioner walker? >> yes. >> that motion carries unanimously. item f, rehearing request, case no. 6 757, 130 bueler street, [speaker not understood], san francisco, california. [speaker not understood] 67 57 previously addressed by the abatement appeals board on june 20th, 2012. >> again, this is 130, 132 bueler street. it came up and it was already heard one time. there was a granting of the order of abatement, so forth. the property owner was given a time frame to complete the work. the property owner has now requested to rehear the abatement appeals a

when one is trying to pursue a particular public health or public safety objective, reducing the harm of drugs or whatever it might be. and when you have powerful evidence that a non-course of system can accomplish that public safety health objective as well or better than a course of system, when the portugal- like object of can accomplish that for better or lower cost, it is a matter of good public policy and a matter of ethics and morality. those three key moral points are fundamental in the state in this country. thank you. >> in closing the program, i want to thank all of you for coming to the 2012 justice summit. one thing that has distinguished our work in what we have done at these summits is action. if you look at over the past nine years, we have the evidence to prove that. out of our first summit came the call to have a community based collaboration that helped use and families work together on a community-based level. we have developed the programs for growth in our communities. out of the second summit came a call for better coordination of services and from that sprung t

that is the one concrete you are doing and it's the public. the public. the public good. that is fine with me. i would like to see you return to actual transparency. in the meantime, it looks like ned ford has never left. thank you very much. next speaker. [ reading speakers' names ]. >> mark gruberg, thank you again. to follow-up on ed's remarks, blinded by self-interest, i think you just focused like a laser beam on your own financial self-interest as an agency. and you are just not getting the picture. i sent you a letter last week, about the driver fund. you know, a lot is said here in public comment and maybe you missed some of it. i hope you weren't missing what i was saying at the last meeting that what you did was it absolutely gut the drivers' fund, take virtually every penny out of the drivers' fund for the next possibly 20 or 30 years and appropriate that money for yourself, because instead of 15% and 5%, it's 20% to the agency. and you know, i can't imagine more -- you know, kind of a heartless thing to do to bolster your bottom line by this additional amount

school a great public school. overwhelming majority of children in the country, 90, 95% are going to public schools. we have to make sure they have a chance to go to a great school. we've been very impatient with the status quo. we had a number of schools around the country not high performing. some were dropout factories. we are turning around 1300 schools around the country with tremendous parental participation. just in the first year or two. all these schools have a long way to go. huge steps in the right direction. huge increases in student achievement. increases in graduation rates, reductions in dropout rates. the challenge and the opportunity is to make every single public school a great, great school for their community. >> if congress doesn't act, the u.s. is going to fall over this fiscal cliff. tax increases and budget cuts that hit at the beginning of the year, the countries, as you know, largest teachers union, they say that will mean 8% spending cuts for education, 80,500 job losses. what's your con

when you said public maps submitted by the public, you're talking about only city wide? >> only city wide. >> not district maps. >> not district maps. >> so not included but with a reference to the website? >> mr. pilpel? >> ditto. >> mr. schreiber? >> yes, reference only. >> miss tidwell? >> yes, i would just clarify that since we're already making edits to the process section in part four that we just clarify there we're adding potentially the 100 hours in statistics we just clarified there. >> agreed. ok. so at this point that means the only thing noted in the appendsies is community newspaper advertisements. ok. mr. pilpel. >> although we reduced it to that, i would add back in the appendsies the final map. i think that's where it goes, appendix one. i would add as an additional appendix if it's possible to print out the individual 11 district maps that blow up a little better, if it's possible. if not, then not. and the district descriptions, even if it's not the formal meets and bounds, even if it's just the document that -- this document. >> yes. >> and the statis

any other member of the public? seeing none, public comment is closed. and the house has changed, so, if we can take a roll call. >> roll call. on item number 9, commissioner avalos? >> aye. >> commissioner campos? >> aye. >> commissioner david chiu? >> aye. >> commissioner carmen chu? [speaker not understood]? elsbernd absent. commissioner [speaker not understood]. aye. kim absent. olague? >> aye. >> item passes. >> that item passes. if you can please call item number 10. >> item 10, approve the one bay area grant program funding framework, schedule, and screening and prioritization criteria. this is an action item. >> again, another item that came out of the plans and programs committee. commissioner wiener. and, again, this is a very important item because it really relates directly to the work that's happening regionally and i know commissioner wiener, as a member of the mtc, has been working along with some of my colleagues on abag. commissioner wiener. >> thank you, mr. chair. i'm supporting this. i'll be voting for it today. i just want to make so

is there any other public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor campos made a motion to move his appointee out with recommendation. my only question was i didn't realize that there was an advisory committee to the secret garden but i'm excited to find out that there is. i'm happy to support that and without opposition. madam clerk, please call item 6. >> linda wong: hearing to consider appointing one member, term endin ending ending july 1e entertainment commission. there is one applicant. >> chair kim: i want to appreciate many of the members that came to speak on this item and also our applicants for are your patience as we move through our previous items. i will be calling you in the order that you are listed on the agenda. and i will ask you to speak for two minutes, both on your background and experience as it relates to the seat and the seat does represent the public health seat for the entertainment commission. and if there are any questions from community members, we will entertain those at that time. so first i'd like to call g

seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i will now entertain a motion to approve the consent calendar. >> moved to approve the consent calendar. >> second fmd >> moved and seconded, all those in favor? >> aye. >> o poised. hearing none, it's unanimous. let's go to the item 5b on the consent calendar that was pulled off. >> hello, karen, deputy director for park plan, good morning commissioners and general manager, i am here to start the presentation on the central subway union square market street station and the item before you is a discussion and possible action to approve under charter section 4.133, the construction of has surface and subsurface construction in union square park, this is required for the union square central union subway station and this was heard at the capitol committee and you saw a presentation by john klun gi, and he is back today, he's going to provide more information on this item. thank you. >> thank you. >> good morning, commissioners, john, the central subway program manager. i'm pleased to

is there any public comment? seeing, none, public comment is closed. we are on item 9, commissioner matters? >> don't see any. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are on item 10, new business setting. >> don't see any. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. item 11 is communications. is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, we are on adjournment. item 12. >> so moved. >> moved and seconded, all those in favor? >> aye. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >> a great man, is that what you called me? she has to be reminded. -- would you tell that to anita? i congratulate you and thank you for coming to san francisco. hopefully you also become a disaster --- we would be glad te to open up our minds and communities to receive ideas from across the country, if not the world as to how we can improve it. it never is about what just san francisco is doing. a lot of our ideas are homegrown. the ideas are transplanted and that is the greatness of our cit

is there any other public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is now closed.o we have a motion on this item? >> motion to send malia -- ms. cohen forward with full recommendation to the full board. >> chair kim: we do have a motion to move this forward, and we can do that without opposition. madam clerk, could you please call item 2. >> linda wong: item 2 motion to approve -- the president of the board of supervisors, supervisor david chiu's nomination to -- to board of supervisors ending july 16. >> chair kim: thank you. this is also a reappointment. we recently heard her speak at rules committee. but because she came on near the end of the previous term, she is already coming back to us for reappointment. and i'm not sure if ms. hurtado is here given she's spoken to the rules committee a couple of months ago. is there any comments from colleagues? if you'd like to speak, his apph the mic. public comment is closed. we have a motion. >> yes. actually i think ms. hurtado just came in. >> chair kim: i see her. >> i don't know if she wants to say a few words. >>

the reality is this public-private partnership is 100% private, and 0% public.n fact, it has reached the point where this board of supervisors can no longer just look the other way, as both the city librarian and the library commission have done for years. mr. chaffee's been talking to you about it for years, and not one of you will look. and if this is the way public-private partnerships run in the city, we have a major problem. >> president chiu: next speaker. >> hello. my name is vivian imperiali, a city worker speaking as a private individual on my own time. not all of you have been