and i'm hopeful that house republicans -- house republican leadership and traditional republicans will reach that conclusion sooner rather than later so we can get the job done we look forward to partnering with our colleagues in the senate, both democrats and republicans, in terms of leader schumer and leader mcconnell, but we need house republicans to come to the table. reporter: [inaudible] mr. jeffries: that remains to be seen. reporter: we have seen a lot of republican ads pushing back on democrat, saying they don't want to ban abortion nation wye and support i.v.f. i'm curious about your thoughts on those trying to distance themselves from these extreme positions. mr. jeffries: extreme maga republicans are on the run because they know they have gone too far. but they are lying to the american people when it comes to reproductive freedom and the american people understand it. kamala harris, senator democrat, house democrat, support a woman's freedom to make her own reproductive health care decisions. we support family planning. we support access to birth control. and we support im

republicans would do the same local republicans would write the republican national committee and it was largely private individuals. so in the case of the democrats, samuel tilden, who was incredibly wealthy, one of the wealthiest men in america, financed much of his own campaign. democrats had other children. august, belmont, who had long for a long time been the chair of the democratic national committee for horse racing fans. belmont is well known as the namesake for the belmont stakes. one of the races still today, part of the triple crown. belmont was also very wealthy and helped finance these campaigns. so money was becoming increasingly prominent during these campaigns, largely financed by individual sales. there were, of course, no campaign finance laws like we have today. and so an individual could pour as much money as they wanted into a campaign. and large that money would go to help state and local organizations fund their campaigns during the election. okay. now we're going to get into the hard part. sure. november 6th, 1876, here is the popular vote. samuel tilden rece

republican obsession with power and control over women's body in our lives knows no bounds republicans insist support ivf but refused to protect access to ivf. they insist access to contraception is s safe and thei support it. but when given the chance refused to codify the support into law. frankly, can anyone take republicans at their word when they say they won't? that's a nationwide abortion band if given the opportunity, we can't mr. president. they have shown us who they are. on just how wildly out of step they are with the american people. as republicans continue on the anti- freedom, anti- women's crusade democrats to continue fighting to be at the right to ivf as you work to ensure people to make decisions about their bodies, their lives and their futures are free from government intrusion. thank you i yield back. >> a senator from connecticut. >> actions always speak louder than words. all their words, the republican colleagues have acted today and away that will speak for years and longer. it will speak to lisa, a constituent of mining connecticut. esme republican colleagues

republicans would do the same local republicans would write the republican national committee and it was largely private individuals. so in the case of the democrats, samuel tilden, who was incredibly wealthy, one of the wealthiest men in america, financed much of his own campaign. democrats had other children. august, belmont, who had long for a long time been the chair of the democratic national committee for horse racing fans. belmont is well known as the namesake for the belmont stakes. one of the races still today, part of the triple crown. belmont was also very wealthy and helped finance these campaigns. so money was becoming increasingly prominent during these campaigns, largely financed by individual sales. there were, of course, no campaign finance laws like we have today. and so an individual could pour as much money as they wanted into a campaign. and large that money would go to help state and local organizations fund their campaigns during the election. okay. now we're going to get into the hard part. sure. november 6th, 1876, here is the popular vote. samuel tilden rece

republican u.s. senator lindsey graham, you may have seen, has been in nebraska trying to talk republicans thereinto doing it. today a single republican state senator said that he was not going to go along with this plan. that it didn't seem right or fair to him to do it this way. especially at the last minute. the reason i say we are watching nebraska in the wake of that news today is because naturally, once this one republican state senator came out and said he wasn't going to go along with it, thus apparently scuttling the plans for the last-minute change, donald trump is now singling out that one state senator. singling him out by name. attacking him online. blaming him. putting pressure on him. which is exactly the kind of tactics trump bought to bear in 2020 when he singled out individual local republican officials in places like michigan and georgia and pennsylvania and all the swing states, telling them to do his bidding or else or face the consequences. that kind of name and shame intimidati

in the house, the republicans control the agenda. they're going to put up a number of bills that deal with campus protests, that deal with more social, environmental investing policies, what they call woke policies in the republican term. they're going to put those on the floor and say let's see how the democrats vote. they're trying to put their rivals in an awkward position. -- host: let as talk to callers. hi, sean. caller: hi. what is -- >> we will take you live to president biden making remarks at the national hbcu conference in philadelphia. president

then these leaned democrat, tilt republican, or lean republican, tilt republic hidden -- republican.aria in north carolina, democratic caller. caller: good morning. i would like to address the republican caller. one thing he did not mention was the fact that a bipartisan bill came up before congress, and trump put it down. they were ready to vote on that. it is more of what trump wants to do. in a perfect world, i want the democrats to control all three. host: two of the three branches of government. caller: yeah, including the presidency. i want to codify women's reproductive rights. that needs to be settled once and for all. the second thing is -- oh, dear, it is early. host: it is. caller: supreme court. we need to do something. this is a laughable supreme court. if we have to put additional seats on the court to bring it back where it is reasonable. in my opinion, i would like hakeem jeffries, i think you would be a wonderful -- oh, dear. host: wonderful speaker if they win the majority. caller: wonderful speaker. host: we will let you go. you go get another cup of coffee. prisci

and i am a republican. however, the third and most important one and the reason i'm saying this is because i sincerely do appreciate your time and efforts coming here and sharing with us your opinions and things that you think, excuse me, think and also that when inevitably the campaign gets nasty, that's not where we believe it should go. so greatly appreciate it. and god bless your evening. >> i want to thank you for being here. i want to thank you for having an open mind. listen part of the beauty of our democracy is that we debate, we discuss, we often will disagree but we the same motivation. i know you're here because you love our country and i'm here for the same reason and we may have other different ideas about how we go about expressing that love and loving our country. i know that about you because you're here right now and you had the courage to stand up and say what you say. and that means a lot to me, so thank you. >> vice president harris first stop in pennsylvania today was at a john's town

[inaudible] republicans don't get.inaudible] >> found trump rencher trump years ago when he owned shutting down the government paid the bottom line is we want a bipartisan negotiation. we'll sit down to a bipartisan negotiation and so it would be passive. as i said we want bipartisan negotiation but were not going to get into the details. >> we do not want chaos. there's no reason for that. would like to do our jobs, that's overdoing in the senate. >> sit down with us. talk about the bill would come up with a bipartisan agreement. that is simple. [inaudible] with election fraud are you worried about more violence? >> i hope not. hope any responsible leader democrat, republican, liberal, conservative would discourage any type of violence. obviously you and to be vigilant and make sure everything is on the up and up when people vote. you also want to make sure people are not blocked from voting when they have a legitimate right to vote. okay? thanks everybody. >> thank you.

republican obsession with power and control over women's body in our lives knows no bounds republicans insist support ivf but refused to protect access to ivf. they insist access to contraception is s safe and thei support it. but when given the chance refused to codify the support into law. frankly, can anyone take republicans at their word when they say they won't? that's a nationwide abortion band if given the opportunity, we can't mr. president. they have shown us who they are. on just how wildly out of step they are with the american people. as republicans continue on the anti- freedom, anti- women's crusade democrats to continue fighting to be at the right to ivf as you work to ensure people to make decisions about their bodies, their lives and their futures are free from government intrusion. thank you i yield back. >> a senator from connecticut. >> actions always speak louder than words. all their words, the republican colleagues have acted today and away that will speak for years and longer. it will speak to lisa, a constituent of mining connecticut. esme republican colleagues

the florida republican party threw him out. police later cleared him of charges in both investigations. but then right on the heels of that, the state of arizona lost their state republican chair, too. that same republican senate candidate who awkwardly appeared with trump this weekend, kari lake, she released secretly recorded audio tapes of the arizona state republican chairman in which she said he was trying to bribe her to leave the senate race. she also reportedly threatened to release more tapes of him and so he quit as arizona state republican party chairman. then, right on the heels of that, the national republican party lost its chair, too. ronna mcdaniel pushed out, resigned, in order to make room for donald trump's daughter-in-law. her experience for the job included being a singer in addition to being to married to one of trump's sons. the blond one. that seemed like a legit choice for the leadership of the national republican party, and so, ronna mcdaniel had to go. but all of that has happened just this year in 20

i am a republican. however, the third and most important one, and the reason i'm saying this, is because i sincerely do appreciate your time and efforts coming here and sharing with us your opinions and things that you think. also, when inevitably the campaign gets nasty, no matter who you are running against, not all of us believe that is the right way to go. thank you very much. i appreciate it sincerely. god bless your evening. >> i want to thank you for being here. i want to thank you for having an open mind. listen, part of the beauty of our democracy is that we debate, we discuss. we often will disagree but we have the same motivation. i know you're here because you love our country and i'm here for the same reason. we may have other different ideas of how we go about that love but i know that we are on the same page in terms of where we are coming from. and i know that about you because you are here right now and you had the courage to stand up and say what you said. that means a lot to me. so th

republican mike johnson, the speaker of the us house of representatives, made such a call to volodymyr zelensky. in a letter to the president of ukraine a day before the visit of the ukrainian delegation to washington, johnson declares oksana markarova lost credibility by organizing zelensky's visit to an ammunition plant in pennsylvania with democrats, but without republicans, they were not invited there, the letter says. the republican calls the trip to the munitions factory a partisan pre-election event of the democrats, and johnson views zelensky's participation in this trip as, i quote: clear interference in the election process. in the end, the speaker of the house of representatives refused to meet with zelensky today in washington, he was unable to schedule it because he was very busy. meanwhile, the investigation into zelenskyi's visit to the ammunition plant in pennsylvania was also initiated by the republicans in the us congress, who explain that they want to find out whether the biden administration tried to use zelenskyi in the presidential campaign of vice president kamal

it doesn't appear that republicans want to do that right now and the house republicans don't want to do that. they are isolated, though, they are on an island. they don't feel they have much support in the senate for their position but we are going to keep talking to our members and our members want to overt government shutdown. we will do so again. house republicans are the only ones that flirt with catastrophe on this side of the dome and we expect that to continue. but it's become as the vice chair said, it's become part of the course with speaker johnson who wants to insert elements of donald trump's trump 2025 into this government funding bill. that's what this is about but we shouldn't be surprised. this is the chief legal architect of the failed attempt to overturn a free and fair election in speaker johnson. this is the continuation of those efforts that's what he's proven is important to him is to do what donald trump asks and that's what he's doing this week. >> good morning, thank you. >> good morning. >> when you have democrats from the 20 districts to voted for save act

as of this morning's paper a new center of no from republicans who don't want the republican presidentialto be president again. and that is headlined in the daily news we chaired the main republican party and endorsed kamala harris for president and this was written by three different former chairs of the maine republican party. we lead our party at a time when candidates of both parties were not only civil and believed in the rule of law but we believe had the best interest of the state an entire nation foremost in their hearts even when we disagreed and policies and we see these same characteristics on full display and vice president harris and her canvassing. sadly they are lacking in her opponent former president donald trump and each of us has had the honor of traveling the state of maine to recruit and support candidates and talk about the values and the republican party once stood for and his maga republican party is unrecognizable to us. much of the leadership of today's republican party has joined in the cult of trump and we know they will care little for what we have the say. bu

the extreme maga republicans do not. as soon as we have the opportunity to act, house democrats will swiftly pass the women's health protection act that will restore the protections of roe v. wade and beyond, in terms of access to contraception, freedom of movement and travel, as well as access to ivf. this is in the hands of the american people over the next 47 days. and it's clear that the american people stand on the side of reproductive freedom. >> if you become speaker, which you are certainly going to be, would under any circumstances with soup -- would you put legislation on the house floor that would either cap in part or hold it going forward? rep. jeffries: we are committed to reversing the damage done by extreme maga republicans in connection with the gop tax scams that cap the state and local tax deductions. and for many middle class family in new york, new jersey, connecticut, illinois and california, as well as other parts of the country, all but eliminated the state and local tax deduction in a meaningful

that massive fundraising advantage over republicans.— over republicans.. that is interesting. it _ over republicans. that is interesting. it is - over republicans. that is. interesting. it is important for both. how are they battling over the seats? how much are they investing in these house races when the presidential election looms large? these are still million-dollar _ election looms large? these are still million-dollar races. - election looms large? these are still million-dollar races. the i still million—dollar races. the most expensive house race in 2022 was in michigan, not an expensive market, but tens of millions were spent there. these will still be expensive, still gaining a lot of resources even though they may not be at the top of voters' minds, this is a presidential cycle, controllers on their minds, stillan cycle, controllers on their minds, still an area where donors are interested and i think especially because the senate now, republicans are favoured to win control of that at this point. the house is looking like a more interesting o

eugene craig, chair of black republicans for harris. juanita tolliver, msnbc analyst and author of an amazing party, "a more perfect party." i'm dying to divert and talk about that. unfortunately, sadly, we got to talk about this guy. mary, i want to go to you first to give us sort of your latest reporting. what is the reaction of republicans in north carolina to these revelations and what are the chances that he is leaving this race? you are on mute. there we go. >> conservative outlets in the state including "the carolina journal" have reported there is internal pressure within the north carolina republican structure for lieutenant governor robinson to leave the race. however, he has said on cnn and on social media that he will stay in the race, and, as you mentioned, he has a very limited window for when he can make this decision. >> and in his camp, how are they explaining the convergence between this mini soldier name he seemed to use everywhere including on facebook and, you know, sort of legitimate, normal stuff that he used and

the forget-you-get migraine medicine™. >>> abortion is a losing issue for republicans, yet somehow republicanut it in ways that are turning a lot of women off. specifically women who will be voting in november. as the new york times reports, like a toothache they keep probing with their tongue, they can't seem to help it. in competitive contests republicans keep bringing it up and in terms there can -- terms that are contemptuous of women. do you want an example? donald trump did it again on monday. >> he will no longer be abandoned, lonely or scared. you will be protect it and i will be her protector. women will be healthy, confident and free. you will no longer be thinking about abortion. >> that is some 1984 stuff right there. you will be protected and i will be your protector. that is some handmaid's tale stuff i post -- i suppose. donald trump's justices gave conservatives on the supreme court all they needed to overturn roe v. wade, a crusade republicans have been on for decades. bands that would in effect after that ruling have risked women's lives and contributed to, as far as i know,

what we are seeing is republican voters, republican elites and activist saying win giving a free passo corporations but not because of any fundamental changing ideas about the role of business and the economy. it's because what they see from disney, what they see out of these boardrooms. the sense these are not our people anymore. these are not -- i think where this populist positioning has been more successful in where you see it get more purchase in terms of grassroots, political, terms of public opinion on the right is when people are defined being on the wrong side of our values. that has been, i think it was the initial principal behind the desantis presidential bid. the thought he may be a viable contender. maybe a viable challenger. organizations people would have thought traditional or republican. but extremely popular. the more he attacked disney, the more he went up in national polls. i think much more so in contrast this with saying republicans need to be friendlier to unions. maybe we need to stay on the uaw picket line. see j.d. vance doing it and some republicans doing i

similar legislation in the house has just had one republican co-sponsor and the republican majority has refused to advance it. just today republicans use their control of the judiciary committee to advance a bill that would weaken the bipartisan safer communities act, reinvigorate the black market for guns, and reopen the online and private sale loophole. that legislation would make it so that convicted felonies -- felons, domestic abusers and other dangerous persons who are prohibited from possessing a gun could easily get one without a background check. and it would make it so that unlicensed sellers could once again profit from endangering our communities. and it doesn't stop there. not only have they sought to unravel our gun laws through legislation and our courts, but our republican colleagues have also sought to defund the bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives. the primary agency tasked with enforcing our gun laws, including by helping state and local enforcement -- local law enforcement solve violent crimes and keep guns out of the wrong hands. the cumulative effec

i am a republican. i've been a republican since the 80's. vote for trump because he's a republican. i won't vote for a democrat. host: alrighty. you can continue to call in on open forum, we will take your calls until the end of the program at 10 a.m. eastern, but we are pausing right here to talk to ashley gold, tech and policy reporter at axios. guest: thanks for having me. host: we have you on to talk about the hearing from the d.c. court of appeals at 10 a.m. -- by the way, you can hear that over on c-span two at 10 a.m., it's about tiktok. they are taking the justice department to court about that legislation that passed requiring them to either sell to a u.s. based company or be banned. update us on what's happening today. guest: today we are seeing the doj and tiktok in court, arguing either side. the doj has repeatedly said tiktok being in the u.s. while being owned by bytedance, a chinese company, is a national security threat to the united states and that they have also allowed the content that comes out of tiktok to be manipulated

i think she has so much hatred in her heart, and she isn't a republican because i am republican and i don't think like her. it's so bad. i mean, she switched to the democratic party, that's what she did i think it is just a sin the way they pick on trump because obama, clinton, and the whole bunch of them all did the same thing and biden in afghanistan, 13 a very young, wonderful men. lona i mean, politics is just getting to be too much. host: when you say the term isn't there any censorship, can you explain what you mean when you say isn't there any censorship? that is not something we hear a lot from people. what do you want to censor? caller: to call trump a pig? host: so you are just saying insults should be censored, people should be here when somebody old another person. -- insult another person. caller: i don't think you should insult somebody like that like if residents. host: that his grace in connecticut. the cheney endorsement of kamala harris, any reaction that you saw on capitol hill. guest: a lot of republicans say they don't feel it is going to move the needle, they lon

that's not me saying it but republican after republican saying that.rms of helping our veterans, let me tell you the republicans keep talking about the $112 billion in the bill for v.a. care. guess what? these dollars were provided in last year's bill, both v.a. and o.m.b. say these dollars are insufficient and that they need an additional $is 12 billion or our veterans' care will be affected. that is what has been said to republicans and democrats over and over again. this bill provides zero additional dedicated funding for vets with toxic exposures. zero. and i don't understand why you were trying to fix some of the omissions in the manager's amendment that was put it in the rules committee why this could not have been added. these are veterans and people who served our country and exposed to toxic chemicals and battling with all kinds of illnesses and diseases. we need to make sure the funding is there. this bill provides none of that $12 billion. i don't understand what they are thinking. i reserve my time. . . mr. langworthy: i'd like to inquire i

there's democrats and there's republican and that's where republicans are. but now it's voting time. and i just i don't know how that's going to go. i feel concerns, i guess you could say, for this new institute that was built on the back of not trusting voting. and i know you don't know the answer, but what are you seeing? what do you think is going to happen? are people going to mail in their ballots? are they going to ballot chase like what's going to happen? well, there are three ways answer that. one is that that the democrats and the anti-trump republicans who are still out there have figured out effective ways to message to to wedge off the maga preponderance of the party from those republicans who aren't comfortable it, who are not democrats. and they don't want to be democrats and they don't to vote for democrats, but they're not cool with the maga thing. and part of the book talks about that, the research where that in the midterms and how democrats and anti-trump republicans figured how to use that hint it relates to the same the same hole that ba

as recently as the 2015-2016 republican primary you had republican prime -- candidates who were discussing immigration in a much more traditional sense despite the fact that this is been a failure to inform immigration for a long time there were conversations going on about immigration in the republican party as recently as that. it seems to be gone. >> it really doesn't in 2013 when they passed that bill, if passed overwhelmingly in the senate but good old paul ryan, who everyone thinks is a pro- business moderate guy did not have the nerve to put it on the floor. basically, the democratsrw in t house chickened out. the republicans chickened out and the bill went nowhere, and ted cruz did nothing and by the way, marco rubio, the senator from florida, who continually complains about immigration, just dropped it. he ran from it like a hot potato so, this is one suggestion i would have for colin harris, and that is, if republicans again try to filibuster it, and she should try to reform the filibuster on this issue, not on some kind of very progressive issue that is controversial. let her do

i am a republican, yes. but i will not vote republican due to the fact that i see only a few republicans who stand on their own two feet without being pushed by other individuals. it is very embarrassing to be a republican right now. if you could respond on the why you guys don't start earlier. guest: as i tried to explain, we did start earlier. the house republicans have passed five of the 12 parts of the budget waiting for the senate which is controlled by the democrats to follow suit. the senate has passed none of the 12 parts of the budget which is why we will not get the budget done by october 1. i would suggest to your caller if that is a major issue, make sure you vote republican this time around. if you don't vote republican, you are encouraging democrats to continue down the path they have been the past of not getting aroue in >> we'll take you back live to the house gaveling in for votes.

use, party ideas tide, gallup says republican ideas not republican. it shifted slightly with harris in the race, but we are still running essential parity in terms of partisanship. trump won where he was down seven, we are now tied. the other thing that has happened, i think it was sort of a pennsylvania race. pennsylvania in 2016, the democrats had a 10 point registration advantage over republicans. 2020 it was about 7.5%. so between eight years, the republicans have shifted and the registration margin is half what it used to be. that's happened in north carolina, nevada. republicans from now to january, they narrowed the democratic registration advantage. arizona republicans abound a little bit. and then on top of all this, of course, the other advantage, and i think the other thing that will happen is i think the vice president has had an incredibly successful five or six weeks, credit to her and her campaign. but it has happened. and i think we are in a place now would a candidate has to win the race. i think september 10 is incredibly consequenti

and republicans passed half their bills. why? because they were so unpopular, their own conference wouldn't vote for them. having failed to complete their work, they want to kick the can down the road for six months. we seen half the fiscal year costing taxpayers billions of dollars. this c.r. would be irresponsible and the department of defense has identified the consequences and have negative impacts on personnel and their families and not include to cover a 4.1% pay razor increase required by law for basic housing allowance and not cover medical costs for military families and stabilize the health care system. they would not be able to have enlistment bonuses. new programs can't start. days and keeping major programs on time and budget will be more difficult. a c.r. will delay multi year of programs like helicopters and the virginia-class submarines and prevent the columbia class submarine and delay procurement on the b-21 raider. and the c.r. damages the readiness. some operations just won't happen. the navy will suffer a del

the reaction from republicans has been all over the place, so some state level republican officials have been deleting photos of them hanging out with robinson at events, appearing with him in certain places, and then the trump campaign released a statement saying that they are focused on winning, but interestingly, that statement, ana, didn't actually mention robinson. that may be the most telling thing of all here. we might see republicans start to distance themselves from him. he is, as of now, we don't know about any appearances he's planning to make today. it will be interesting to see, does he get invited to the next trump rally here, i think, coming up pretty soon in wilmington in north carolina, and do other state level republicans continue to appear alongside him. that's very much an open question. but certainly the feeling here on the ground is that people are going to try to move forward without robinson at their side, ana. >> antonia hylton, thank you, keep us posted as things develop on the ground in north carolina. interesting to see the trump campaign distancing themselves

republican. good morning. caller: good morning. , lucero -- kamala harris said that her job was to find the root cause of illegal immigration and that was welcoming people with grandiose promises. many voted what she done about the 300 million missing children that are believed to be set -- sex trafficked and prisoners. guest: to the first caller i will say forecasting. and i do not particularly enjoy political forecasting myself. i think it ultimately does a disservice because we are going to find out what the results are. there is an election, and the pole is the -- the poll, the final one is election day and that is what matters. that said there has been a massive increase in the amount of polling that we have had, publicly available polling. some of it is good and some of it is not so good. it goes into these aggregates that we see. and i do not know. we all as reporters, we all got stung after 2016. i was working at cnn back then. and we will are -- we were all watching the fivethirtyeight.com i'll that w

the investment in solar is disproportionately in republican districts and republican states. the idea that you will do a full sweeping reassessment of green energy tax policy and be able to do it like this it's going to be quite a challenge for the next. >> you can imagine that but no wholesale reversal. >> correct. i think there are more interesting you can do in tax policy and the question is whether or not the votes will be there to bear that. that's why i think you have to separate the two things, tax policy from fiscal policy and those subsidy questions because you can do a tax extension through the tax cuts and jobs act without getting into some of the thornier issues around green tax credits. >> this past october you served as a very tumultuous time in the house. by all accounts you did a masterful job of dealing with an exceedingly difficult situation. our divides within the conference driven by ideological differences or is it more a function of clashing personalities? >> those are two of the three reasons. the third reason is you have a narrow republican majority of

the faster republicans can build a post-trump party. again, of course, that comes far from given, right? think of it this way, donald trump could utterly disappear from public, never appear in public once again from now until election day, still have a pretty good shot of winning the white house and republicans flipping the senate. like a queen, maybe. nd th makes it all the more important that, again, the country pro-democracy coalition does the hard work of preventing that outcome. because the reality is winning a clear majority is not enough. listen to this. the republican party of the united states, one of two major parties, the party has won the popular vote one time since the fall of the berlin wall. say it again. only one time since the collapse of the iron curtain have republicans managed a national majority in a presidential election. so it is incumbent on democrats to win by such a large margin that overcomes the structural advantages against them. even some republicans know this is the case, like former congresswoman liz chen

and today it was the same old cynical story is republicans have to get no, no, no.this point, it's obvious just by would ever talking points dave force through on cable news when the rubber hits the road in the voters called republicans will do anything to get out of actually passing legislation that would protect webb's right to reproductive health. women in this country have been through enough and what women do nothing aso a man found liable for abuse telling us what we can or cannot do with our bodies pretty well we don't need a politician to a convicted felon leaving us are treating us like we are criminals. and his tragic and republicans only seem to care about protecting life we supposedly of some cells in a medical lab freezer printed what about that life is a fifth-grader who school they get shattered by a man with an ar 15 he wants you to the math class and not as a and one of the neighbors yet one more lamentably down the delivery table is maternal mortality crisis among women of color rages on. most republicans can only be care less about the sanctity of

not republicans.ublicans. they're talking about woke economic policies. i don't even know what they're talking about. what they mean. but do you want to know what people back home talk to me about? they're asking me why are republicans trying to cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires? why are republicans trying to go after social security and medicare? another example, mr. speaker, democrats actually care about strengthening and protecting the violence against women act. not republicans. a majority of their conference voted against extending the violence against women act. let me say that again. a majority of their conference voted against extending the violence against women act. and now they have the nerve to come down here and talk about violence against women and use it as part of their sick ploy to go after immigrants? give me a break. their bill is so poorly written that it could hurt survivors of domestic violence. and i could go right down the list. it is obvious to me that at some point

a trump endorsed republican. that could make a difference to some republican voters. but let's just be very clear. they didn't leave because of the anti semitism. they left because of the porn site. and a man who is, disparaging transkids and transpeople in his comments but apparently likes to indulge in the watching of it in his private time, hypocrite. >> i think what would move the needle is if they had an abortion bill. >> i actually think there could be a reverse coat tails effect. it's very rare and i understand why people are skeptical that it will happen. usually the top of the ticket is the one who has the trickle down effect on the rest of the ticket. mark robinson is a much more weaker candidate than a typical republican on the ballot. split ticket happens in north carolina. but the things that he has said r-l going to, are already widely known yes in the state. but he's unpopular. he's not polling well. he's almost certainly going to lose. and i think that that could have a real effect. those republicans aren't necessarily going to go vote for kamala harri

the republican, a republican who is running for governor of north carolina. going to show you what they tried to delete, did not want you to see. also breaking in trump's alleged golf course shooter has just been officially charged with attempted assassination. and you are looking at your screen at the judge who will oversee the case. >> s that is aileen cannon, who is also overseeing trump's classified documents case, will be back have a dream a dream that people tell you is impossible and over again, mostly might dismiss navigation system that always feels like it's working against you that there is a different way, a different place a place where we were told it's impossible until we made it possible can imagine in future and created bring new impossible to the emirates i told myself i was okay with my mom or it to severe rheumatoid arthritis symptoms with my psoriatic arthritis symptoms. but just okay. isn't okay. >> no, it was done suddenly if you still have symptoms after a tnf blocker like humira or embroil revoke, he he's different and may help rinvoq

be smart, republicans. you been pushed around long enough. you can stop right there and insert donald trump when he says by democrats. don't let it happen again. remember, this is biden/harris fault and not yours. that is your problem. the blind being led by stupid. the reality for the country is that you can't take care of our fiscal business. we don't have an operating budget for this nation right now because of this nonsense from someone who is unserious about our nation's business. how do you convey that message? we had poling out this morning, nbc news polling, showing an inflation and the economy, this country still trusts the guy who tweets this. >> look, we have to keep explaining that this man is not a good businessman. he does not understand the economics of what it takes to run a government, and he is willing to put all his capitol into trying to block us from being able to do the basic things the government does. mike johnson as speaker is continuing to follow him. i do think this week, mike johnson is not going to do that. i do n

republican party. these are three, it was three justices he put on the supreme court for brought roe down. and so that's where the republican party is today so now there's a question though, and this is where all of a sudden there's backlash was in the democratic party from both joe manchin and kyrsten sinema. >> that whatever wing of the party you think that they represent dent it obviously one of them is not technically a democrat now, but today, harris reiterated her support for eliminating the filibuster in order to overturn roe versus wade. so joe manchin now independent had signaled he was ready to endorse harris earlier this month. but then once she said that today, he said this know that you've been considering endorsing her change your not going to happen. >> you're not going to to doors i think that's basically something that could destroy our country and my country is more important to me than any one person or any one person's ideology and then i mentioned kyrsten sinema also now, an indepe