>> i can tell you what was described in the rfp and applications that came back -- >> this is rfp is nonprofit organizations or entities that run the program >> the nonprofit organizations that run the program and it will send out to 40 housing related organizations in san francisco. the and the organizations that won the bid had proposed that they would put together a coalition of eight different organizations who would assist them in terms of the outreach to the community and range of services they felt would be needed >> what is the name of the organization that won the bid >> the san francisco housing corporation >> when did they win the bid or were granted the fundses? >> november they were approved. >> november of 2014. >> yes >> so the program is starting to get ramped up? >> no. we have not -- the foundation has not received a resolution from the ic with the specifics to put in the grant agreement. so it is still under discussion >> could you explain that more? who determines who wins the rf p.? the foundation or i c.? >> well the foundation -- >> make reimburses recommendati

the back the issuance of an rfp purposes those drafts is detailed the staff of contracts for months as a result, the significant balances at the end of the fiscal year our cb o deliver services with the investment & infrastructure as reductions in and impact the staffing oewd has priority the b o a with the plan that reducing the balance by the end of the fiscal year and it includes the names where we are in the contracting that process and the related amounts i'll accelerating the progress a priority and to implement stems to help the process i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you very much supervisor wiener. >> thank you, sir a question on this the b l a says it shouldn't be cut but we received the news because the groundbreaking timeline do we know and this is a question i'll ask the same question to mr. rose in terms of tracking the money does that money get spent the following fiscal year. >> to answer that it is yes. the way it is generalized because generally oewd is responsible for generating new programming every year. >> if you're a round number $1 million if fis

department has a grant agreement or if you don't have the money appropriated can you issue an rfp or soliciting applications for grants from the money is not appropriate i'm wondering in terms of it not been spent is it obligated or put out for bid. >> right the listed of we've provided did budget analyst officer shows the grants we're in the process of moving out and the detail you know contract negotiation in signature the rfps have been completely again that was provided which the details and the vast majority of the money will be enbermuda. >> to the b l a in terms of the money that your stating will not be spent are you saying you don't believe it will be obligated or put out to bid before the end of the fiscal year. >> ms. casco mr. chairman and supervisor wiener i'm sure you're aware of a huge difference between an church and enendurance the departments will enberry money once that encumbrance is practiced that's theirs and, yes they can enbureau the money there is such a big difference between spending the funds the enar encumbered funds will not be spent. >> how can a depart

yf, our website, we did an extensive amount of outreach on the rfp, we had a bitters conference we know as a government entity it's public money, it can seem overwhelming if you are a young community based portion organization to put this together we have a bitter conference to walk them through the rfp, we post the questions on the website, then we also have you know, people can e-mail alexa with additional questions, which are also posted on the website. so a we as debbie said got 16 proposals in we have panels that consisted of alexa and myself, and a 0 waste expert, a long time residence and possibly one of the first consultants in the u.s. so very knowledgeable so we scored proposals, anybody who got over 70 got to the nekdz round, and anybody over a 90, we thought, yes, we will fund them, the ones between 70 and 90, we interviewed those people, that was a different committee of alexa, me, and the executive director of the clean city tell us if you don't know work force development organization that serves people with barriers to employment and formulae incourse rated, so they do a

this is a hearing to consider the process and outcome of the rfp for radio broadcast services i've provides water 0 memo to each of your offices that lists the details specifically the colleagues work and the highlights are in cooperation with the various experts we've drafted a comprehensive r f x for the station qualifications and experience that will be necessary to perform this work a multi faucet work to included the direction distribution to the my time culture and outreach force 40 for the platforms and broadcast the service announcements we've convened the 3 panel comploemd of sdildz individual with media and community engagement knowledge and experience k p.s. m respond and met the qualifications and commission requirements in the solicitation and have a total of 83 points from the panel and the only prequalified vendor from the committee is satisfied with our process detailed in the memo i would recommend that the clerk will provide a motion premised from this for the committee toe consider next week to be acted on to authorize to enter into negotiation with k for the successfulne

in around august of last year we sent out the rfp we got responses back in september october the ic met as a whole and agreed to accept the bid that was received then instructed the foundation to go about putting together the grant agreement. since then there have been several meetings between the ic sub committee and the vendor that grant is on hold because the ic has not reached an agreement on the special conditions they might want initially they put out an rfp for $800,000 they are recommended it be reduced to 200000 that you could achieve the goals of the grant >> i got to say it's appalling in this housing crisis when people are looking for resources this is one community has ample resources when it comes to rental assistance grants to see pending in this column is really heart breaking i hope we through this hearing will be able to break through whatever the abinstruction currently exists because this blockage is blocking people from remaining in the community and thriving [applause] thank you. >> so the current balance in those accounts now in the workforce account there is $892

oversees to get it on the roles you see significant development in planning in construction and 6 rfps we'll issue in those developments areas you've heard in the mayor's office presentation ocii will transfer certain bond procedures another part $1.7 million for a repair and the bonds precedes the reserving resolution provides for $51 million not to exceed that includes the cost of issues ocii the informal as we transition to the city office of the city administrator and other assets to highlight the mexican museum the city receives as part of the development argues approximately $2.24 million no tax rerudimentary the second half of the fiscal year accounted for in our review proximate we talked about the big the landfill increased on slide 12 and due to the cycle we have pushed anti development and get the dollars identity in the form of infrastructure work and the third partners and now j from a visual prospective to look at the procedures those dollars go to the mta a portion of new property tax increments for the depth is 24 percent if you're soliciting it is for affordable housin

proposal before us with the benefit and any consequences i certainly understand when you put out on rfp one the strongest you know thump up or down whether or not you're going to be considered if you get yours in on time and, yes an appeal process along the way i suspect we can create an appeals process to meet that deadline we want to address this particular one because this is where we are in the process. >> we're viewing a first round of an rfp or an r f q. >> did they say the second search firm say they'll submit in given the chance. >> definitely. >> i like commissioner vice president andrewss idea if we can provide an explanations and the two proposals is better than one. >> one of the things that work we could do is to tell h.r. that we view the - he want to set a different cut off date in terms of to stand the date to june or whatever and also instruct them along the lines for them to contact the various ethics commissions in the state of california and ask them what search firms if any they've used in they're hiring of on executive director and we know the f p pc has a trusted

partner funds in addition to property tax increments we have on reserve and importantly there are 3 rfps two in candle stick and the master developer and lennar removed candle stick stadium for a mixed use mixed income retailed center we want to keep pace with the market rate development and the land use approval and importantly we will this year for the first time in 10 years have another property transfer moving on to slide 6 for respect shows you how far we've come in mission bay our work program diving in the key focus affordable housing in those areas in a number of the sites not only heirs but important supportive services including childcare all incomes from the low to the moderate and that's the block in 4 p that is under construction the public infrastructure with the open space and importantly i want to highlight on this slide there are street sustainable street improvements through the tax increments we didn't have this bond issuance is part of budget we're initiating the conversation that the fossil mission bay but we will come back from the board approvals for the proposals

this was a product of rfp 647 and we want to let you know that the purpose of the grant is to improve the protection of older persons and dependent adults in danger of abuse by raising public awareness of elder and dependent adult issue and mandatory reporting requirements. api legal outreach is equipted to [inaudible] city wide effort you will hear about after this item. recently the program manager showed the data shows asian pacific islander are unrepresented. we can draw that there is less abuse or need in the api community, but it seems more likely there is a suvarunderreportingin the community and we also know there is probably very real barriers to this issue and so it is with this type of confident that we have for thisancy and this grant to provide the multiculture and multilingual skills to target outreach and education within the api community. one key element is to produce and distribute language appropriate education materials to the general public, professional and care givers. we urge your support of this particular grant >> any questions? commissioner loo. >> the educa

good question the reason it is going to expand for one year the following year we'll try to get a new rfp so i'm trying to extend everything from the federal grant and we'll be three to four 0 diagonal and looking at people bring in their own devicess what exactly do we want to do to put it in place as any other questions or comments from the public hearing none call the question. >> > all in favor, say i. > opposed thank you the motion carries item j requesting authorization to renew the grant with the reliable technician with the provision of the sf connected program from july 1st, 2015, to june 30th, 2016, in the amount of $51,000 plus plus a 10 percent contingency not to exceed 463 heed and $13 thank you aaron. >> thank you reliable tech has been providing the tech support and provide the support for the 200 and 50 computers in the locations across the city and satisfactory completed services requests in addition reimaged the system is we actually do both pro-active or preventive maintenance and reactive it has for scheduled unserviced calls in addition to provide for service the tech

we know was of great interest to the board so want today come back to it and the plan is release a rfp in july to keep the mile stone frz the 2020 date. we need to upidate the regional funding plan before we go out with contracts especially with the design build on that. with that we are happy to take quigzs >> thank you casey. thank you. supervisor kim do you have questions >> iment to make a few comant. it is great to see the progress over the last 6 month said. know thisf a complex engineering issue and nice to see it is moving forward. we'll still continue to explore it. the lift and ada issue is probably whatsemes the most prominent with the bilevel boarding being that at the 50 inch, those that need wheelchairs or unable to use the stairs are going to have a more difficult time accessing the seats on either level, that is probably one thof big issues i see mpt but it is great to see design engineering solutions to see how we can take into account the needs of multiple systems on this one rail. >> thank you i just have a comment. i think for casey or lieuese, it is my understandin

cap at the varies programs through the senior and disability action i want to thank elaine for the rfp process and to my colleague michael for providing new fresh eyes from the office on the aging first up is indicated the grant agreement to continue serving as san francisco high cap and again high cap stands for health insurance consulting and advocacy program the purpose to provide community education and counseling to medicare beneficiaries those of us over 657 under 65 on disability and persons that are imminent of medicare eligibility i've worked with high cap and realize how vital this service is medicare is a context system especially, when english or insurance jargon is not our primary language san francisco high cap meets the benchmarks with the number of clients served and those recruited and trained and registered since high cap is introduce a volunteer model it must run a volunteer friendly program to maintain a basis that includes persons with bilingual and boy cultural skills off as a side i want to draw your attention in the scope of services you may have noticed that th

moved >> good mornling president james [inaudible] we seek approval for this new grants issued from rfp 647 for suicide pr vention and emotional support services. the purpose of the grant is maintain or improve well being of seniors and [inaudible] due to grief resulting from death of a family member, spouse or other lovered one or people who need crisis intervention based on isolation in the community or lack of access to other services. for this grant when is occurring on institute for aging this is a renewal for the next 3 years. first if there is a component now that recognizes the grief education training and community outreach done by the director doctor pat rrk arbore, this is something we has traditionally done and it wasn't in as a service before and now we are tracking his community outreach he does in education. additionally, there is service items for informal emotional support and formal emotion support. these 2 items were teased out to acknowledge the 2 types of individuals that call into the hotline. those who want assistance over the phone but don't want to give informat

we were prepared to select only one provider for this grant, for this rfp. we did have to pause and take another look because we had 2 strong bids for this particular request for proposal and agreed it would be a benefit to bring in a new provider that would also help open a new client base. the new grant is presented by my colleague mike zaug after i present item l. item l is the grant for api legal outreach. this is for the young aer adult with disability legal service. as i have mentioned, api legal outreach is a comp tent agency. they provide service for younger persons with disabilities by way of providing 195 units of service, legal assistance hours to at least 110 unduplicated consumers. when we explain there would be another legal service provider api outreach staff was eager to help make sure there is strong collaboration between the programs and minimize duplication in service. >> thank you mariea. i have a question. in the target population on page one there is no mention of lgbt. >> very much so. >> any other comment or questions? >> one. it seem

the angling and disability friendliness of san francisco like housing and communication information rfps that went out to bid we met the consumer advocacy and the home care the big news we're starting to work on the citywide assessment it is done every 4 years in advance of the area plan to it identified where the c a money will be i'm going to turn it over to cherlyn >> good morning, commissioners sherry deputy director of dos i mean, i'll try to be admirable in my brevity basically i'll show you a number of goals we basically give update on our we have goals that are set we give updates on the oifbdz when we do the area plan and go through and talk about things that are interesting and movement in the last year so if you have questions about any of the other objectives you've seen feel free but i'll highlight a few things goal number one is improved quality of life and first objective under that one organization is about our health pro tem's and risk prospective services i'll highlight the fact we're funding two evidence based promotion programs healthy living programs i know you've ha

february discussion on hedge funds, in his motion to reject thoughtful amendments to the hedge fund rfp in march, for two examples demonstrate his lack of credentials to become vice president. by contrast, i have witnessed numerous examples of my birder with tics due diligence on a number of issues, including due diligence regarding the sale of the concepts currency over light hedge funds debacle, questions about fossil fuel investment, the investors, questions regarding investing in hedge funds in february, and important key amendments to the hedge fund rfp in march. since i began attending our meetings, alarmed about the hedge funds, i have ranked you commissioners abilities with my birder most effective. followed in descending order by commissioner bridges, matt chris, cohen, asking jordan, driscoll and in dead last place, stansberry. you do not want dead last becoming vp. do you? >> any other public comment? >> thank you so much. i really cannot add more to the accuracy of patrick shaw's report. one thing i would like to say is that her has continuously been open and responsive to t

long term energy facilities for sf clean power and other power consumers on may 29th we issued the rfp for cca customer care and administrative services this will cover the data exchange and accounting and billing and call center operation services at program launch proposals under the rfp are due june 25th and hope to be before i for authorization to execute an agreement on august 11th. >> looking forward the thirty day period for the board of supervisors to provide february open the adopted not to exceed rate resolution will ends on june 15th also staff is on target to deliver an updated cca implementations plan for commissioner approval at the next commission meeting if approved we anticipate we'll submit that within two weeks to the c p uc that has 90 days puts us around october and last but not least we're working with consultants and our city attorney's office inform develop an over for the face one energy supply we're beating our schedule on august 3rd for the editions on arco simon symptom in july i know that commissioner moran earlier asked about the risk analysis we're doing

creates tier one and two individuals during public comment that was mentioned decision makers throwing a rfp process the procurement process that truly could have impact that is true as a community member through high-up and sometimes programmed that are deeply embedded between the department and not decision makers on any particular day except that day they need to make a decision on an rfp again there is an inconsistency within the department we talk about the procurement. >> commissioner hur i share the concerns of any fellow commissioners one this problem already exists right their filing form 7 hundred and inconsistently piloted that is a problem that exists frankly, if they're going online managers will go look carefully and more education and people will be more selective in making sure in terms of noticing and the power of those not on the list some problems may soft themselves there will be some consistency if you're leaving it would the department heads that is hard for the people on the outdoor to look at this i'm okay with some consistentcy once again we you could or fshgd those

to do diligence we should have an rfp to see what else is really out there of course then your rates would really come down that is my thought again. >> i thought we addressed last meeting that would be activity considered in the next cycle >> yes. >> all right. are there any more questions from the board? >> thank you. >> is there any public comment? oh, yes. all right. as you approach to make public comment we ask that you identify yourself and then confine yourself to the time a lotted which is three minutes. yes? >> good afternoon my name is stephanie moman the vice president of contracting care with brown and toll physicians here in san francisco 3800 of the san francisco medicare eligible retirees are enrolled in the blue shield 65 medicare program each of these retirees has a relationship with a brown and toll doctor as a primary care physician the options presented to you all have advantages and disadvantages as you have seen. i would like to highlight one of the important advantages of remaining status quo with the current plan specifically the shield 65 option the slide poi

in our past history has not been good with this field the only time you brought your rates down with rfp and the next time they went up double digits this could be lower with the intention of next year skyrocketing that say big concern with me. i think it should be everybody here you don't have the long memory i have on the board. so we have a lot of ups and downs with the blue shield and double digits with pressure i don't see how that's going to change. which brings me to the point will there be more transparency in this >> director dodd? >> i will add this will greatly increase transparency because we won't be trying to eek out information suter will have to accept what medicare pays right now suter gets more than what medicare pays, that is one of the places we will see our costs remain lower because we're not paying the high hospital costs and we will also get the bill and diagnosis that is something that is completely unavailable to us now it will increase transparency because we will be paying the bills >> that is a big plus for me otherwise i don't see anything with your history

the rfp for getting our purchasing is happening. the one piece that advocates have kept asking for, and is not in place yet, and other we've got not to exceed rates established, and we know, revenue were going to get from our customer base, it's really time to get on the ball in this because we need a separate stakeholder process as we had over the past two years. for people that are really dedicated to getting the local distributed generation behind the meager resources, local buildout stuff to happen. we've been knocking on the door with staff about that and they said okay but we have not been getting any official responses. so, i would call on you, commissioners, to: staff to stakeholder meetings to getting the buildout stuff figured out especially because this would keep rick keating we need to show labor how this is going to be real but we also need to show environmentalists were really going to build local clean energy not just by clean energy on my. please do push on that point neither would god not to exceed rates are: gener

storing it ourselves gather for the digital data that is something part and parcel or are we putting our rfp out for storage are we dissipating where we're getting the cameras. >> i think to taser international had a presentation last time that brings me to the i guess two more questions from the department is purchasing we purchased the cameras are we're going to purchase with the vendor and tasers and international we've purchased from them with the department of justice grant and then are we're going to separate the data storage or purchase the whole thing? and then has the department analyzing different all of the elements for storage >> it sound like we're going to just wants so i don't know if you want to answer that now or agendize it. >> i'm happy to present on it is a work in processed so i can answer the different sides but no decision made the cameras that came they went out to bid. >> the tasers. >> yeah. the tasers won that bid. >> i theorist that - i believe they came in low bid. >> mined we got an exception with one vendor that met our needs so i'd like to know that's my recol

process and make sure -- this is directed towards government agencies so make sure that you write your rfp qualitative and quantitative measures that you can achieve and work with different kinds of people i wanted to make sure that everyone had different skill sets so it wasn't just to mirror what i was an expert in i wanted to make sure that everyone brought in a different piece of their expertise to the table and that's why we were able to work so well together and we made incremental improvements that were valuable and content can be just as important as functionality. so what have we been doing since launch? well, i have been saying this for a long time we can not just add technology to a flawed process, right? now we've put information in one place on the portal and we want to look at at the process itself and try to streamline that and we decided to tackle restaurant permitting and we focussed on restaurants. why restaurants? san francisco has more per capita than any other city in the u.s. and and city in the u.s. and i think most of us know that and 3.2 $3.2 billion in consumer sp