>> ed, in reading the ben rhodes email at best. this is total damage control it ♪ an email designed to figure out how to get information out to the american people. they talk about policy to make sure it doesn't look like they have a weak policy. it's total damage control. it is not giving information to the american people. >> well, on one hand i would say yes, that we have to remember the context that jay carney didn't talk about today, which is that this was september of 2012, pretty close just a few weeks before a critical re-election battle, obviously with mitt romney it came up in one of the debates. >> let me stop you there. that's what is so disturbing to me. we had four people dead. they weren't just chattel. we didn't have four buildings that burned down in southeast washington or southwest washington. we had four dead americans they are doing damage control. they are not trying to inform the american people. that's what is so disturbing. >> yes. and no yes on the police politi, the election was coming up. they should hav

is the ben rhodes email a smoking gun and what will the political impact be? a fair and balanced debate on that question ahead. our live chat is up and running. you choose the news. what stories might we be missing? what do you want to see covered? go to foxnews.com/happeningnow. you can participate or tweet us at jenna at fnc or jon scott@nnc. [ laughter ] smoke? nah, i'm good. [ male announcer ] celebrate every win with nicoderm cq, the unique patch with time release smartcontrol technology that helps prevent the urge to smoke all day long. help prevent your cravings with nicoderm cq. [ banker ] sydney needed some financial guidance so she could take her dream to the next level. so we talked about her options. her valuable assets were staying. and selling her car wouldn't fly. we helped sydney manage her debt and prioritize her goals, so she could really turn up the volume on her dreams today...and tomorrow. so let's see what we can do about that... remodel. motorcycle. [ female announcer ] some questions take more than a bank. they take a banker. make a my

they didn't edit the cia talking points, but it tushz out ben rhodes and the white house had writtenir own talking points. >> they had written the talking points about what was going on in these protests in two dozen countries, and i think it's important to remember what ambassador rice was preparing for on your show and others. when she sat in this seat that i'm sitting in right now, benghazi was not the first question you asked or the second or third. it was t was actually the 14th question you asked, and that's not a criticism, but it's a reflection of the fact that the focus of your show, like many others, was these protests going on in 20 capitals around the country. >> are you exactly right. sir, i have the ben rhodes memo right here, and in it he says one of the goals that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm americans to justice. the only people who had been harmed, americans who had been harmed, at that point were the four americans who had been killed in benghazi. on another page he specifically refers to a report in the british newspaper about benghazi, so to sa

as i say, if david rhodes was being influenced by ben rhodes, the benghazi piece we've been talking about would never have aired because it shed bad light on the obama administration had it been true. but in my first days at cbs back in the '80s when i was doing kind of what you do, i've seen this over and over again where it's almost impossible to separate media criticism from public criticism. i rarely, if ever, saw a case where a conservative said that was a tough piece cbs did about conservatives, but it taught me something. or a liberal saying, that was uncomfortable news for me to hear, but that was good reporting. people bring their political believes into conflicts, about accuracy of the story, to a point where it's almost impossible to separate those two points. >> and joe, in your piece, there is a sense of low morale at cbs. is that because there hasn't been a full accounting of what happened? >> it's that, and it's also that there is a lot of resentment around lara logan. frankly, a lot of her coworkers there, you know, felt she had too much power. there's some kind of competi

one in particular is the suggestion that ben rhodes came up with this on his own and then he wasn't even talking about benghazi but later in the email it's repeated and that subject line, benghazi, so i don't know if they think that we're really that stupid. i guess they do. and you do have to wonder where is the white house press corps and what have you done with them. the briefing did get a little more heated today and i think rightly so. when you go to the white house podium, you need to have better opposition research than your opponent, if you don't have it, then you are going to end up with another situation -- you can understand why people have little trust in government when they can't get answer a simple question. >> all roads lead to rhodes. >> it's interesting now as you pointed out in the green room, greg, usa has it above the fold. jonathan carl asking the question, asking the question over and over again. they start with the media matters. they say fox is so bias the, they keep worrying about benghazi, it was over. it shouldn't have been over. they should have been asking t

which was not in the talking points from the cia. >> and ben rhodes, let's make clear. he's not some chief strategist. he's no henry kissinger. he's essentially a political operative at the nsc. writer, fairly paign staffer, young guy, who runs the strategy on foreign policy. and go back to what he said. that it was blamed on annis almost yak video and, quote, not a broader policy failure. so that's the key point there. >> yeah. it's a political statement. i mean, the argument that emerged after this was whether it was an act of terrorism or the islamic video. he's putting this blanket over it, saying, we were not at fault. and they were not at fault, because barack obama was running for president at that time. and it was claiming that he had put a lid on al qaeda and terrorism. >> this is one of those scandals i don't get. why didn't they just admit that it was a terrorist attack? >> good question. >> knows that terrorist attacks happen and i think if they had been honest about it and said this is despicable, we're going to fight back, i think the public would have sai

ben rhodes' email and he says in the email, ben rhodes does, brother of david rhodes, president of cbs news, that to convey that the united states is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad, to underscore that these protests are rooted in an internet video and not a broader failure of policy, to show that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm americans to justice and standing steadfast through these protests, to reinforce the president and administration strengthen steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges, and then the top line says, since we began to see protests in response to this internet video, the president has directed the administration to take a number of steps, his top priority has been the safety and security of all americans serving abroad. and indeed that was exactly what people in the administration were saying, that was what the people like parooting were since that came from the brother of the -- parrotting since that came from the brother of the cbs news president, that seemed to work pretty effectively. another article

but the only place the video comes up is ben rhodes' e-mail. >> no. the place the video came up is in the dozens of countries where people were protesting because of the video. maybe in this alternate reality where there's a giant cover-up, the only place on the planet where no one cared about this planet was benghazi. but i think a reasonable individual at that time would think those attacks might have been motivated because of the innocence of muslims video. >> well, a reasonable individual testified today, brigadier general lovell, a one-star general, well respected because he's served the country very well. this is what he said today. >> we didn't know how long this would last when we became aware of the distress, nor did we completely understand what we had in front of us, be it a kidnapping, rescue, recovery, protracted hostile engagement or any or all of the above. but what we did know quite early on was that this was a hostile action. this was no demonstration gone terribly awry. to the point of what happened, the facts led to the conclusion o

but i think what the ben rhodes e-mail did this week, the revelation of the ben rhodes e-mail was it told us there were in effect two different sets of talking points. one was created, at least came from the intelligence community, with heavy input from obama administration officials and was intended for delivery to capitol hill. the second, which is distinct and was revealed in the judicial watch dogs this week, part of it was the ben rhodes e-mail, and there were talking points, created by the white house for susan rice, there were appearance on the sunday shows. the difference between the two is the former, the first set made virtually no mention of the video. the talking points, they didn't mention the video at all. and 100 pages of e-mails released in 2013 mentioned the video only twice in passing. the second set of talking points, the video was suddenly the central part of the story. >> did you a lot of the early reporting there. do you feel vindicated there? >> well, i think we certainly had more answers to questions we asked back then, but we have more questions we can get an

he had long resisted calls for a watergate style committee, but now e-mails show that ben rhodes played a critical early role in shaping a false narrative of the attacks. these revelations compelled the house to take every possible action to ensure the american people have the truth, adding i tend for this committee to have robust authority. the panel will be bipartisan, but like the house, controlled by the gop. brett? >> i guess this means the main stream media will have to cover this story a bit more now. >> that would stand to reason. we're talking about the formation of a dedicated committee with subpoena power. >> thank you, james. that was the bombshell on the hill. just down pennsylvania avenue, the other bombshell, an e-mail emanating from the white house. here's chief intelligence correspondent catherine her ridge. >> reporter: the administration's explanations about who knew what and when are beginning to unravel in a very public way. an e-mail sent three days after the attack leads directly to the white house and suggests a senior advise tore president obama played a central

one question i wanted to ed te you, the suggestion earlier in the week that the e-mail from ben rhodes which was basically the guide for susan rice for the sunday talk shows, that it had really not to do with benghazi. are we really to believe that when the e-mail actually says benghazi as one of the subheads and also just from a media standpoint, why in the world would a cabinet official go on five sunday shows if it wasn't to talk about what specifically happened in benghazi? >> well, i think in fairness there, yes, susan rice was going on five shows to talk about benghazi plus. plus the violence throughout the muslim world. and fox and others were reporting it at that time, as jay carney was trying to point out, about cairo and other embassies, et cetera, that were in jeopardy. so i do think we've got to be careful not to suggest that the ben rhodes e-mail is only or was only about benghazi. he was talking about benghazi briefly in there and jay carney said it was a cut and paste from cia talking points. we can talk about that. but we should point out that most of the e-mail was abo

or was rhodes, on out right lie to the american people on 5 sunday talk shows?s it a coincidence white house since josr. staffer is david rhf seeks news, and the man pro drafted cia talking points, mike morell, is now working as a analyst for seek cbs news it mue a coincidence that morell is afilliated with beacon global strategys, a washington consulting firm with close ties to former secretary of state hillary clinton. whose name you may have noticeed is hardly mentioned by washington official dom in connection with benghazi terrorist attack. that too must be another in what must have become a very long line of coincidences. time for a few of your comments. a surprise for authors of e-mails, tweets and facebook post, you receive one of very first copys of my newer book "border war" my first thriller, written with hig my cowriter jim born, your thought, last night we asked if you would vote for a member of a former president's family, how did a country with over 300 million citizens end up with a gene pool of president potentials the size of a dixie cup, i love

ben rhodes preparing susan rice for an appearance on the sunday shows. congress says this was could have had by a subpoena. remember here is the president of the united states just after the election in 2012 promising if congress wants information about benghazi they will get it. >> we have provided every bit of information that we have and we'll continue to provide information and we've got a full blown investigation. >> that's the president talking just after the election in 201237 we'll have a full blown investigation, we'll give them what they want. the e-mail that came out from ben rhodes was released from a lawsuit called conservative watch, it talks about benghazi but listen to jay carney at one of several contentious white house briefings saying this e-mail was not covered by the subpoenas. >> because all of the documents, the thousands and thousands of pages of doums includingcuments information around the benghazi talking points, were around benghazi. this was not about benghazi but about the general dynamic in the arab or in the muslim world a

the political hierarchy of the west wing is being cc'd by ben rhodes on this.re section labeled benghazi here on about the third page of the runoff of this email. >> let's play the sound bite it's not dan it's jay it's he changed his name. >> not about benghazi but the overall situation in the region, the muslim world where you saw protests outside of embassy facilities across the region. >> sounded more like art carney there because is he not telling the truth as you know. >> yeah. >> exactly. >> go ahead, why isn't he telling the truth? how do you know is he not telling the truth? >> not telling the truth because in here it says we are not aware of any actionable intelligence attack on u.s. mission in benghazi was planned or elm eminent. dangerously inspired by the u.s. cairo. involved assault consulate and annex. he denied this had anything to do with benghazi. >> companies crazy. >> look, let's step back for amendment movement let's assume for a moment that jay carney and you are right it's jay carney, i have known him for along time. jay carney is telling

and the e-mail from ben rhodes itself says these demonstrations. by their own admission, that includes benghazi. look, i think the administration and the cia have gravely wounded the agency here. and what they're guilty of is what the bush administration is on which being often accused of but didn't do and that is politicizing intelligence. this is inevitably a political judgment. let the administration make it case an hold them politically accountable. but trying to hide behind the cia is a big mistake from the top of the agency on down. >> how significant do you think this development is? is this perhaps a pivotal point in which we will begin to see a, one would hope, an opening in the stone wall and the reality, the truth come spilling out? >> well, i certainly hope so. and let's start with susan rice and the five sunday talk shows. i really think she's a side show, an irrelevance city. the real question is where was hillary clinton. where was hillary clinton. susan rice wrote an op-ed saying mrs. clinton was overwhelmed by the events of that we

but when a court judge orders them to do it, they turn over the ben rhodes document?> no, i can't explain it. >> is it a problem? >> i think it's posed a political opportunity right at the moment. let me make a couple comments on benghazi. i know something about this. and the day after the susan rice appearances, the day after the event, i was meeting with some senior intelligence committee folks. i still advise in some capacities on boards to some of our agencies. i think there was legitimate confusion. i agree about the point that the video was in egypt and nobody really knew what the facts were. i'm reading from the ben rhodes memo which i've never seen before and it said we're not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the u.s. mission in benghazi was planned or imminent. and i think that was accurate. so -- >> we didn't have actionable intelligence about 9/11. that doesn't mean it didn't happen. >> by the way, this was an intill jens failure. it wasn't a conspiracy. and there aren't aliens in area 51 and vince foster wasn't murdered. an

rice for her controversial sunday talk show appearances with deputy national security advisor ben rhodes writing in an e-mail two days before that the administration wanted her, quote, to underscore that these protests are rooted in an internet video and not a broader failure of policy. joining the panel this week, "wall street journal" columnist and deputy editor dan henninger. and columnist mary o'mcgrady. you've been following this for us. i thought all the e-mails were supposed to have done the least long ago. >> how did it turn up now? >> so did congress and all the media this one came out of judicial watch, a conservative watch dog group who put in a freedom of information act request saying there's more stuff there, we want to see it. they fought it, but they eventually released it last month. >> but it got turned over to the committee in the last several days? >> turned over to the committee and the watch dog group. the narrative put out by the white house, this is all information from the cia, everything we said in the first week after the attacks was based on what the intellige

and that came out of rhodes. it's right there in that memo.e know that the white house is spinning this to give credence to this myth that al qaeda's on the ropes. it's bigger today than it was a year ago. it's bigger now than it was on 9/11. and we're paying the price for the incompetence and quite frankly the criminal negligence of this administration. >> sharyl attkisson on our website put up today that there was an e-mail from a woman named libya update from beth jones. the e-mail was titled -- beth jones was then assistant secretary of state to hillary clinton. and according to the e-mail, jones spoke to libya's ambassador at 9:45 a.m. on september 12, the day after the attack. and when the libyan ambassador said the government suspected that former gadhafi regime elements carried out the attacks, i told him the group that conducted the attacks was ansar al sharia, which is affiliated with islamic extremists. now wait a minute. if hillary knew or her state department knew the day after 9:45 in the morning, why did she along with the presi

rhodes said the u.s. had nothing to do with it. we reject its message and content. hillary, we reject the video in content. hillary, the video is disgusting and reprehensible. >> there's no justification for violence. it's an identical statement. >> right. >> and so there are two questions. first, did hillary's statement form the basis of that smoking gun e-mail, and was hillary really the author of the coverup and the second question is how did it get there, sean? was it smoke signals, telepathy, channelling? there's no e-mail that's been disclosed to the congressional committee either as a result of the court order or the subpoena between hillary and rhodes, so are they covering up yet another e-mail or did he get it from the newspaper? >> i think tray gouty, a well known attorney. the next question i want to know is when they were told otherwise from the people on the ground, no to a spontaneous demonstration, no to a youtube connection, they manufacture this lie, they cover it up, four americans are dead. compare it to example watergate. >> you know i think what

that seems to be what this memo points to by ben rhodes. saying that, saying in other words what we now believe to have been the case. what's the problem, what's the smoking gun. >> there's a lot that needs to be answered for benghazi. i think that the initial handling of this by the party, overpoliticizing it, in fact, diminishing in i really real invetigatory effort to find out what the facts are. oh, we still want to bring whoever did this to justice is almost ludicrous at this point. you have something at this e-mail come and be revealed foia, again, contextualizes concerns that a lot of people, not just republicans had about the handling of benghazi and what led up to some of the decision make on the ground. i think it's a legitimate tool and point of interest to discuss. >> what this new memo shows, normally say, calling people scum bags, is it any different in substance than what we got in the bipartisan support on the senate intelligence committee way back in january? >> short answer, no. here are all the new documents that just cam

including one for ben rhodes. o that these attacks were as a result of video. >> claire lopez, it's great having you here and i want to get right into this question. do you think that some of the revelations particularly the ben rhodes email in which it becomes quite clear that the white house, not someone deep in the cia, but the white house itself had specifically taken out references to al qaeda and talked about this video that we know is not true, is that a game changer and if so, why? >> yes, govern. i think you are absolutely right. this absolutely is a game changer. that judicial watch was able to get these emails. the one from ben rhodes in particular, but a slew of others as well, and they very clearly show that the white house itself not just the cia as we now know acting director mike morell took part in the alteration of the talking points too, but the white house, at the highest levels in the white house, altered those talking points to remove references to al qaeda, to it being a terrorist attack, an

. >> i was an animation major in college, so i had very, very good training from the rhode island school. >> part of that training was complete a student film. seth draws and voices the characters. >> hey, about that? another state that's going to abolish the death penalty. >> oh, is that right? >> instead they make you share a popsicle with tom waite. >> when did you discover you could do voices as well? >> i was pretty young. began with impressions. >> you guys have any cheez-its? >> honey, i think we should move. >> fine, let's have this conversation -- >> his student project at the rhode island school of design, a professor takes enough of an interest in and recommends that he takes it out to hollywood. >> with his student film as a calling card, seth quickly lands a job. >> he was hired by hanna-barbera which was a pretty extraordinary first job. >> you are? >> johnny bravo. >> i wrote for a show called "joan bravo" on cartoon network that aired for a few years. it was a cult hit in its own right. >> he gains some on camera experience. but he works mainly behind the scenes. these ar

wendy gillette, providence, rhode island. one of the performers is in critical condition. no spectators hurt. crewmembers suffered minor injuries. >> we are learning new details about a deadly shooting in richmond. a driver that overturned may have been targeted. somebody in another car chased the blue suv before opening fire. it happened near rigota boulevard at 12:30 yesterday afternoon. eastbound lanes were shutdown for 5 hours, snarling the traffic and the gunman is still on the loose. >>> an elderly couple terrorized in their own home in the middle of the day. an armed man broke into their home in a quiet neighborhood and it is not the first time he has been there. the couple tells kpix5 mark kelly they did what they had to do to stay alive. >> to a robber this street might look like a good street to ransack. not when dorothy is home. >> i do what i have to do. i was afraid i was going to do. what i had to do is not let that gun go off. >> reporter: saturday afternoon at 3:00, she heard her head, who suffers from early stage alzheimer's talking to someone. she went do

i want to flip it back to the senator from rhode island. mr. whitehouse: on my trip through senator nelson's state, the army corps of engineers officials in jacksonville gave me some pretty dire warnings about what the sea level rise portends in florida, both the punch from storms that will bring higher seas ashore and the steady encroachment of salt water. this, as the senator recognizes, is a scene from western boynton beach after tropical storm isaac in 2012. i don't know if you can see it, if you're watching, but this sign says "no wake zone." the family put up a "no wake zone" sign for cars going by not to put wakes up to create more damage. the corps also showed me what two feet of sea level rise would do to everglades national park. i think went down to everglades later on. but -- i went down to everdplaids lateevergladeslater. two feet -- that's all ocean again. that's a pretty serious change. the southeast florida regional climate compact predicts that waters around southeast florida could surge to two feet in less than 50 years. so th

we now know there was an effort by ben rhodes, who knows, did someone else tell ben rhodes to run with this idea of pushing the video instead of going with what they actually knew. the other thing we learned in the last couple of weeks that president obama was not in the situation room during the benghazi attack. the question remain, where was he that night, he definitely made a speech the next morning and did his fund-raiser. why does it matter? the next thing you elect a president, what kind of guy is he going to be? is he the guy in the situation room trying to make sure two more guys aren't going to be dead? >> the real crime took place in benghazi. >> why won't the media stay in the story, the president in the rose garden pledged to bring these people to justice. jay carney contradicted things he said before and things he said under testimony. why this is a story. >> it's not hard to get the answers consistently correct if you have a timeline that doesn't change. that's just common sense of the press secretary. also another thing that's common sense as a press secretary, a former

so this e-mail from ben rhodes comes out and this is coming from the white house. advancing a narrative. they're preparing susan rice for the five sunday programs with a story that we all know that they knew wasn't true. what do you want to say to the president about this and maybe hillary clinton? >> to both of them and to panetta, all of them told me within two inches of my face, within two inches, saying, i feel for you. i'm sorry for you. this shouldn't have happened the way it did, but it did. it was a problem of the video and we will double check and get back to you. we'll let you know what happened. and they stuck with the video even knowing at that moment it was very, very untrue. >> all right, pat. again, we're sorry for your loss. thank you for being with us. >>> earlier today john mccain took to the senate floor to address the newest allegations. take a look. >> a time has now come for a select committee. the time has now come because these talking points raise more questions than answers. it is time for a bipartisan, by bicameral select committee to inv

langevin of rhode island. page 4, line 21, after the dollar amount insert, reduced by $5 million, increased by $5 million. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. mr. langevin: madam chair, the amendment that i offer today addresses the topic that is of the utmost importance to our national defense and that's cybersecurity. before i go into particulars, i'd like to first acknowledge the important work of my colleague, chairman wolf, on this vital issue. and although he's retiring at the end of the year, he has certainly left a legacy of support for cybersecurity funding which he and ranking member fattah have continued in this bill and i thank them both for their important work. madam chair, bad actors in cyberspace are growing in number and sophistication and as policymakers we have an imperative to act in the public interest. when congress came up short in its efforts tone act comprehensive cybersecurity legislation in the 112th congress, the administration rightly acted as best it could to

newly released e-mail from white house advisor ben rhodes, showing him shaking the talking points with then u.n. ambassador susan rice. those raising questions over what then secretary of state hillary clinton also had a hand in it. steve, what kind of democratic reaction are we getting today? >> well, democrats say we have had enough benghazi hearings already. most notably, the appearance of former secretary of state hillary clinton on capitol hill. gordon schiff says it makes no sense for democrats to participate in yet another heari hearing. >> i think it's a tremendous red herring and a waste of taxpayer resources. so i mope that he has -- >> most other democrats agree, house leader nancy pelosi said this latest call for a hearing is subterfuge and harry reid calls it a partisan political circus. >> the republicans are still very eager to investigate these new developments, so what happens next? >> they'll call for the newly released e-mail, they call that e-mail a smoking gun. and they'll ask for a house vote on a select committee to investigate the attack that did leave four amer

at center of the developments, a incriminateing e-mail written by white house staffer ben rhodes white house constructing what was a act washed defense of their -- awkward defense of their words and actions in days following benghazi attack, white house claims there were two sets of talking points giveen to susan rice before she went on 5 sunday talk shows, and famously lead to the -- lied to the nation about what happened in benghazi, new white house ex plan nation comes a day after a freedom of information request by judicial watch produced that incriminateing e-mail. e-mail udateed september 14, with subject line reading, prep call with susan. states goal for her national tv appearances of quote, to underscore that these protests are rooted in an internet video and not a broader failure of policy. press secretary jay carney today, struggled to attempt to persuade the white house press core this e-mail, dateed 3 days after the terrorist attack, was not even about benghazi. >> this is not about benghazi, it was about overall situation in the region, the muslim world, you saw protests

ben rhodes writing in an e-mail two days before that the administration wanted her, quote, to underscore that these

and the thing i'm curious about is obviously somebody guide ben rhodes -- guided ben rhodes to create this email. bill: why do you think that? he was an advisor to the president. >> yeah, but you are telling me a junior staff member is going toed to -- is going toed as adva senior staff members member? i think nothing happens in the white house without the blue print and thumb print of valerie jarett. bill: the gentleman testifying was in the region in the theater of operations. he's going to say what happened and i think more critically what did not happen that night. you believe to this day that this is the biggest coverup in american history? >> i still do because let's look at it this way. we have a cross-cooperation between different facets of government that seem to be supporting each other and supporting in he sense a bald face lie. so it's interesting. yesterday i was reminded of ron ziegler, mr. nixon's press secretary when i was watching jay carney. it's an incredible amount of deja vu for somebody 57 years old. watergate was described by ziegler as you a third-rate burglary

well, our hearts out to rhode island. >> and go texas! >> yeah.e a page from north dakota. >> that's right. >> thanks so much. of course, you can catch brenda on bulls and bears every saturday morning at 10:00 a.m. eastern right here on the fox news channel. part of our business block every saturday. we hope you had a great weekend and keep it here for news throughout the rest of the day. up next here on fox, "the healthy you." up your game. up the ante. and if you stumble, you get back up. up isn't easy, and we ought to know. we're in the business of up. everyday delta flies a quarter of million people while investing billions improving everything from booking to baggage claim. we're raising the bar on flying and tomorrow we will up it yet again. say "hi" rudy. [ barks ] [ chuckles ] i'd do anything to keep this guy happy and healthy. that's why i'm so excited about these new milk-bone brushing chews. whoa, i'm not the only one. it's a brilliant new way to take care of his teeth. clinically proven as effective as brushing. ok, here you go. have y

, give me a chance to respond, ben rhodes is involved in prepping people for sunday shows. the largest question in the middle of a presidential campaign is whether the benghazi tragedy should be attributed to something lacking in the white house policy, and his point in prepping someone for a sunday show is no, this tragedy was not about a failure of our policy. it was a tragedy -- >> so your -- >> wait -- [ overlapping speakers ] >> that's what they were trying to do. >> we have more on this coming up next, thank you, guys, tonight right here on "hannity". >> i'll say diversion, benghazi, benghazi, benghazi. weren't we talking about something else? >> why aren't we talking about something else? is she kidding me. i wonder what the families of the four dead americans think. the mother of one of those killed in benghazi join us. that and more tonight as "hannity" continues. ...and a choice take 6 tylenol in a day which is 2 aleve for... ...all day relief. hmm. [bell ring] "roll sound!" "action!" my guests are "nathan, which dish is better?". now i say you can have it all wit