james robard denying the request for a delay, what was his reason?'re hoping to learn more about the reasoning soon. but this is an ongoing drama, judge robard hulted the travel ban as we know, about a week and a half ago, denying the request from the trump administration. robard referred to president trump's tweet reacting to the ninth circuit decision last week, reacting to the stay request. judge robard said i'm a little surprised since the president said he wanted to see you in court, you're making this argument to postpone proceedings here in court. are you confident that's the argument you want to make. the lawyer said yes, that is. after he -- as we know, he said no, this could not be postponed. the travel to the travel ban will proceed on the merits in front of judge robard. >> you're learning details about what the administration is thinking about to try to do a new executive order. >> people within the trump administration are thinking about next steps after that stinging rebuke from the ninth circuit court of appeals last week. one option

of washington with minnesota is arguing for, and we argue that on a timetable before judge james robardsn the district court and the eastern district of washington state. and that would go forward. it would be the normal process, but remember, the administration has not lost this. all they are losing right now is the ability to have this executive order/travel ban in n operation while the case goes forward. that is a very plausible option for them. wolf, if, as you say, they go forward with the normal process and go back to the seattle judge, what is the timeline? >> he has outlined a very fast timeline of briefing back and forth. the state makes their case. the administration response, the states can read on to that and then he would take all that under consideration presumably have a hearing. the paperwork back and forth is supposed to happen -- by next friday, the 17th, that would be done. he can then order another aural argument or make a decision based on the paperwork. so, that is a very quick timetable. ninthrestingly the circuit last night set if you want to come back to us for a

judge james robards, given the attorney general here in washington state a full victory by offering this temporary restraining order. arguing and citing that the state does have standings, it's being harmed by this executive order on immigration and it is likely the state, they would win on the merits of the case. here is the attorney general from washington, bob ferguson, reacting after the decision today. >> judge robards decision, effective immediately, effective now, puts a halt to president trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order. the law is a powerful thing. it holds everybody accountable to it. that includes the president of the united states. >> tucker: >> that stops the bae refugee program, the 90 day ban on people coming in from iran, iraq. from libya. we do not know what the trump administration is going to do. donald trump did tweet today earlier that we must keep people out of our country, evil out of our country. the deferment of homeland security issued a "no" comment today but certainly, it is likely the trump administration will appeal. >> tucker: despite t

for now, that order is paused under judge james robards temporary x training order.ese cases make their way through the courts, a brand-new fox pulled back out and it shows that the nation is divided with a slight majority of voters saying they are against trump's order. congressman trey gowdy here in an exclusive on why he disagrees. first, for the latest on the travel ban status can we go to trace gallagher. >> hi, martha. the biggest legal challenge is now moving forward. the ninth circuit court of appeals is deciding whether an 11 judge panel, also known as an on banc panel, should rehear the case. last week, a three judge panel ruled against the administration, saying the president does not have unreviewable authority when it comes to immigration and national security. until the ninth circuit court issues its decision, the department of justice was hoping to postpone the proceedings at the district court in seattle. that is where judge james robards initially put a hold on the president's travel ban. he said he was surprised the administration was asking for a d

judge carrier during the campaign, judge robards now. instead of attacking the judge, the president should be workingt with congress to tighten up security where it is actually needed. the president has said well, if there are attacks the judge will be to blame.. i remind him, not one attack ons u.s. soil has been perpetrated by a refugee from one of the seven countries in the executive order. this order doesn't make us any safer. if anything, the executive order increases the risk of lone wolf attacks, our greatest threat.thw that's what happened instead san bernardino. that's what happened in orlando. and no authority less thand senator john mccain has said exactly that, that it will increase the likelihood of attacks by these loan walls, these disaffected people who are egged on by the evil isis. so i make this offer to my friends on the other side of the aisle. join democrats in recent wi executive order and we will work with you in a bipartisan way in good faith to actually make our country safer.ver close up that visa waiver progra

judge robard's decision, effective immediately and effective now, put a halt to president trump's ononstitutional and unlawful executive order. —— justice robart‘s. the executive order establishes a process to develop mechanisms to ensure those coming into america love and support our people. labour say they'd legislate to limit future price increases by the energy companies, the day after npower announced that it was putting up its dualfuel bills by 10%. a five year—old boy has died at ann—luh—bee primary school, —— ablaby school, near hull, after choking during a school dinner break. the head teacher said everybody was deeply saddened by the tragic event. the ministry ofjustice says it's "urgently" investigating claims that security workers were paid by offenders to deliberately fit electronic ankle tags too loosely so they could be removed. after days of huge street protests, the romanian government has withdrawn a draft decree which would have reduced some penalties for corruption. mother hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. wit

trump is slamming judge james robard, bush appointee for halting the immigration order saying quote, the opinion soft-called judge which essentially takes law enforcement away from the country is ridiculous. and will be overturned. president trump is also preemptively blaming the court system if there is an attack on his watch. he tweeted, just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril, if something happens, blame him and court system. people pouring in, bad exclamation point. in reaction, we've seen democrats, republicans, security experts, and former doj officials slam the president's attacks on the judicial branch. but in arguing before judge robard, the department of justice had an opportunity to defend president trump's argument that the country was in peril and struggled to do so. watch. >> how many arrests since 9/11? >> your honor, i don't have that information. i'm from the civil division if that helps get me off the hook any. >> well, let me tell you the answer to that is none as i can best tell. you know, you're here arguing on behalf of someone that says

he has left to the defense of jobs -- judge james robards after donald trump criticized him for blocking the ban on twitter. derided him as a so-called judge. response, the judge posted this on a chinese social media page, calling trump an enemy of the rule of law and saying-- bein a country claiming to the most him a credit on the rule of law, for the president to lead the charge in scolding judges makes him no different from a bully without dignity. >> think the important thing is whether the chinese judges will .ive up to what they say if they do, it's not a bad thing at all that a country like china can have a justifiable grounds to say that the americans are doing not quite as well. >> as criticism mounts against trump, china is hoping to solidify its diplomatic ties. a foreign minister met with his australian counterpart in a visible push to show unity with australia. he also played down rumors of possible tensions with the new u.s. administration. >> any sober minded politician can clearly recognize that there cannot be a conflict between china and the united states because both w

court district judge james brevard -- james robards. week, trump said, "if something happens, blame him and the court system." "the washington post" story showed outrage. the judicial that will be responsible in the event of a terrorist attack. because it blatant disrespect for a branch of the government. "amid all the noise, it is important to remember that refugees are a part of america's fabric and its promise." tom: let's end on a sporting note. the reaction to sunday night's epic super bowl. flo: the history making super bowl is getting a lot of attention in the u.s. one man at the heart of that epic super bowl is the new england patriots cornerback, tom brady. he is the man of the moment, soon to be a hall of famer. he is a divisive character. this portrait in "the boston globe," you could say he is an athlete some people love to hate. that love trumps deflategate. -- that situation was an obstacle in his football career. he is quite divisive also because he is a big supporter of donald trump. a lot of people wonder if he is an am

shame james robards ruled. this weekend, the president tweeted the opinion of this so-called judge which takes law enforcement away from the country is ridiculous and will be overturned. >> mr. trump reiterated the need restrict some immigration. >> you have been seeing what's been going on over the last few days. we need strong programs. so that people that love us and want to love our country and will end up loving our country are allowed in. not people that want to destroy us and destroy our country. freedom, security, justice will prevail. >> i want to talk process. kimberly, let's start with you. you worked with the nine circuit court in california. you have the scars from its thee dash the district court had a ruling. i think the federal government's position is going to prevail eventually but you have a problem potentially in that the ninth circuit court of appeals, three-judge panel, two liberals, one moderate. if that court does not agree with the trump administration, then it reverts back to the lower

you note judge robards very well. tell me about him. >> i do.ighly regarded knight judge here in seattle, conservative in the way the he looks at the wall very thorough, very soft-spoken he wears a bow tie, but a lot of us know him just as he's comfortable out and some waiters fishing for salmon. >> bill: very regular guy. it's widely believed that his order will be overturned because the president does have the law on its side with national security, and that's the way it's going to be appealed by the justice department. do you believe in that? >> i don't think it's entirely clear. judge robart's order doesn't list the legal basis for his decision, only that the state of washington and of the state of minnesota are going to, and his, prevail on the mirror. that will be a question for the ninth circuit court of appeals and ultimately the supreme court. >> bill: is a consistence that the president will be able to walk down those seven countries in syria for national security reasons, but that again is speculation. in the past, judge robart has wo

seattle judge james robards grants a nationwide restraining order against the most controversial provisionse restraining order, stopping the government from these parts of the executive order. bottom line, you have the judge, steve, stepping in here. we should point out despite all of the calls that this is a muslim man, it is not. there are many muslim countries that are not included in this seven countries, including the most populous muslim country, indonesia, and also egypt. your thoughts on this judge's action? >> without knowing the specifics of those sections, i can't speak to exactly what the judge is ordering. i can say that it is interesting to me that this seems to be how we are making law and our country increasingly. a president that makes an executive action, going back to president obama, now god president trump doing some of the same thing, judges seeking to immediately undo those actions. i would suggest that the legislature might want to step in and do its job, particularly on these kinds of issues that i think merit a deep and broad public debate on something like this ki

eric: the trump administration is dying to pill judge robards order.seven mostly muslim nations with muslim nations to muslim nations with an apartment justice is expected to the appeal is seems possible. this comes as the new cbs news poll reveals an even split when it comes to the order to take a look at these numbers 351% of americans disapprove of the president's order while 45% approve but if you take a look at the white's broken down by party lines you will see the democrats and republicans are at 85% each on the way their party basically gives this order along party lines. what happens next as we continue? charlie hurt as a columnist with the "washington times" and a "fox news" contributor. waking g for the ninth circuit where it will likely be appealed. it's likely a very liberal panel. what will happen with the next step? >> it's hard predict to you are right it is a reliably liberal panel. i have to say it's fairly astonishing that there is even one federal judge sitting on a federal judge in united states of america who actually doesn't unde

did not issue a stay against the temporary restraining order that was put in place by judge james robardsthat they are not going to appeal that particular ruling solely on the issue of the temporary restraining order. they were considering going back to ninth circuit court of appeals, 11 judges to hear the same course, basically, that they presented to the 3-judge panel, or file an emergency appeal. they have decided they're not going to do that. what they are basically going to do is leave in place that temporary restraining order, then going to go back into federal district court and fight the case on the constitutionality of the president's extreme vetting executive order of a couple of weeks back. in addition to that, the president, on air force one a short time ago, said he is considering writing a new executive order on the extreme vetting. we have been talking about that today. that would potentially put in a special specific carve out for people who are permanent residents of the united states and may be people who are already in the country on temporary visas, allow them to leave

of washington with minnesota is arguing for, and we argue that on a timetable before judge james robardsn the district court and the eastern district of washington state. and that would go forward. it would be the normal process, but remember, the administration has not lost this. all they are losing right now is the ability to have this executive order/travel ban in n operation while the case goes forward. that is a very plausible option for them. wolf, if, as you say, they go forward with the normal process and go back to the seattle judge, what is the timeline? >> he has outlined a very fast timeline of briefing back and forth. the state makes their case. the administration response, the states can read on to that and then he would take all that under consideration presumably have a hearing. the paperwork back and forth is supposed to happen -- by next friday, the 17th, that would be done. he can then order another aural argument or make a decision based on the paperwork. so, that is a very quick timetable. ninthrestingly the circuit last night set if you want to come back to us for a

judge james robard. the president trump administration claim there is no protection from the people who want to come here from the countries covered by the order. iran, iraq, somalia and sudan and yemen. he issued this order. >> pete, what is the immediate effect? does this mean people with travel? >> the immediate effect is more confusion. it took the administration four days to make clear what the order did. now it is trying to find out what this ruling means. the u.s. officials were saying in the hours after the ruling it would not change anything immediately. all of the visas granted before the executive order went into effect were canceled by the order. they said anybody who now wants to come will have to get another visa and that will take a while. there's confusion about the effect of the ruling on refugees. it does apply to that executive order too. >> with that said, what's next statement from the government on what this means on immigrants who want to come here and students and others already h

he basically fact-check the judge in seattle, judge robards and said that the judge was incorrect when he said that no one has been arrested for extremism under this kind of -- just be when i pointed that out to my radio show. >> i appreciate that. the judge from the bench had askedyb the attorney to back attorney how many people have axley been arrested under this e of order and i said i don't kno. everybody can look at eric tucker associate oppressed. i don't hear the media covering this. this should be the biggest story of the day. he was wrong, but he did it from the bench. all of us are wrong once in a while, and we apologize and immediate left effect, but this is a judge who then said that issued a nationwide injunction from the bench in seattle in the ninth circuit and was just wrong from the bench and what he said about what this type of extreme vetting would provide or could have prevented had it been emplaced earlier. >> sean: kelly end, there are many countries that if you haves really countries that do not let you in their country, just because you have an israeli passport,

basically, today judge robard in the washington state court, the district court, is asking for both sides to follow briefs by 3:00 p.m., and there's going to be a phone conversation at 6:00 p.m. eastern. the issue issued a week and a half ago, should that endure through the trial on the merits of this travel ban or should the government be allowed to, you know, push for what it's been asking for for the travel ban to move forward while the appeals process goes on. that's going to be what's discussed today. then you have this other issue, wolf, that we spoke about on friday where the ninth circuit, one judge in the ninth circuit is asking for a larger panel to look at this case. there's that at play as well, and the government is expected to file briefs and the state as well by thursday. there's a lot going on in the legal front, wolf. >> and we'll see what the decision is by the trump white house, the trump justice department. that could be released fairly soon. stand by for more on that. barbara, you're over at the pentagon. the president's national security advisor retired lieutenant ge

inappropriate for the president to be called about so-called judges when you're talking about judge robard any of our judges. it's equally inappropriate for the democrats to say, we have a so-called president. this has got to stop, it's important that we debate these issues, it's important we let this judicial process play out. this is not the first time the president and the congress have gone head to head. you go back to franklin roosevelt. there's any number of instances where this happens, we can't undermine our judicial institutions by resorting to attacks on judges or for that matter, attacks on the president in terms of his legitimacy. it's got to stop. >> thank you all. and next, the breaking news at this hour, new details on that commando raid, a navy s.e.a.l. dead, civilians dead, we know who the target of that raid was, and you're going to need to hear this. >>> trump charges the dishonest press isn't reporting on terror. is he accusing the media of a cover-up? >>> more breaking news like these pictures, live pictures from the senate. democrats on the floor, and they are plannin

they're appointed by republican presidents, unanimously confirmed in judge robard's case. these are solid decisions. and we expect the president to respect the judicial system and follow these orders to the tee. it would be great if he now showed the wisdom of revising his strategy and rethinking this unconstitutional act. it doesn't sound like he is going do it. he issued an all caps tweet we'll see you in court. we just saw him in court and he lost. >> actually, with regard to what the president did say shortly after the judgment came out, i want you to listen to donald trump right now. this is what he said. >> it's a political decision that we're going to see them in court. and i look forward to doing it. >> so you believe the judges -- >> we have a situation where the security of our country isat stake. and it's a very, very serious situation. so we look forward, as i just said, to seeing them in court. >> what is your response to that? especially when the president says that this was a political decision? >> well, a couple of things. first off, this president has an

. >> the president praise of his stomach previously called james robards who issued a stay on the travelan eight so-called judge. short time ago, supreme court nominee gorsuch told richard blumenthal that the presence comments on judges are "disheartening and demoralizing." the white house said gorsuch was merely stating his views. president trump stated his abuse wouldn't nordstrom dropped his daughter and cybele. "my daughter if unger has been treated so unfairly by nordstrom, she is a great person always pushing me to do the right thing. terrible." critics say by a blasting nordstrom, the president is further blurring the line between his administration and his family business, here's the white house response. >> for someone to take out their concern with his policies on a family member of his is just not acceptable in the president has every right as a father to stand up to them. >> nordstrom says this was strictly a business decision but the company has issued a statement supporting immigrants in the wake of the temporary travel ban. tucker? >> tucker: thanks a lot, trace. up next,

and it's clear that the district judge in washington state, judge robard, believes there's some merit to those claims, they could be successful in those claims, that in part factored into his decision -- >> the hearing tomorrow, that's obviously the next step in this process? >> that's right. this is going to be oral arguments, both sides will have 30 minutes, it's going to be over the phone. we got word it will be live streamed, 3:00 p.m. pacific time is the time of the hearing. after that, we expect the ninth circuit court to act quickly to issue its decision you can bet that the losing side will want to appeal, which means it could go to the supreme court fairly quickly. >> joining us now to speak about the state's argument. bob ferguson is joining us again. i want to get your initial reaction to the argument. >> no surprise, they're repeating arguments they made before judge robart, that he was not persuaded by. there's nothing in the filing i've seen. i only had a chance to look at it quickly, there's nothing in there that's particularly surprising. >> the argument that your stat

he dismissed the so-called judge who had abstained his order of judge robards, and had to say this about appeals court. >> i listen to a bunch of stuff last night on television that was disgraceful. >> chris: when richard blumenthal said those supreme court nominee judge gorsuch found them disheartening, here is how president trump responded. >> his comments were missed represented. what you should do is ask senator blumenthal about his vietnam record that did not day. >> and when senator john mccain armed services committee raised questions about the yemen rate, the president tweeted this. i'm going to put it on the screen. if senator mccain should not be talking about the success or failure of a mission to the media. only he and bolden's the enemy. he has been losing so long he does not know how to win anymore. look, i take your point that you are not a punching bag here. and the president in the white house, they take incoming should be able to fire back. but does this kind of personal attack help the president in building a coalition that he is going to need for the bold agenda that

james robard who halted implementation of the order. trump calling him a so-called judge. saying that he couldn't believe a judge would put the country in such peril. patrick leahy, a democrat issuing a statement on the president's twitter response. he said, the president's hostility toward the rule of law is not just embarrassing, it is dangerous. he seems intent on precipitating a constitutional crisis. we are joined now from capitol hill. those are obviously some very serious words you used to describe what the president said over the weekend. let me ask you from this standpoint, what a trump defender i suppose might say. those are harsh, blunt words that the president had for the judge. they are certainly not words in tone or style that we are used to seeing a president direct at a judge or really anyone on the political stage, but the president, his administration did comply with the judges order. if they are complying with the order, does it rise to the level of constitutional crisis? >> it does in this regard. look -- put into totality. first the president fires the

it was temporarily halted when james robards in seattle issued aa nationwidide temporary restraininingrdeder on thehe . >> the courtrt concludes the circumstances s that brought it here today are such that we must intervene to fulfill the judiciary's constitutional role in our government. therefore, the courtrt concludus that entry o othe above-described tro is necessary in the state's motion is hereby granted. juan: judge robart's ruling sparked multiple outbursts on twitter by president trump, who called robart a so-called judge. robart wasas appointed by president george w. bush and unanimously confirmed by the senate in 2004. one of trump's tweets read -- "just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens blame him and court system. people pouring in. bad!" over the weekend the department , of homeland security began allowing visa holdlders affected by trump's order to board u.s. bound flights. amy: well, for more, we're joined now by one of the people caught up in trump's immigration ban, saira rafiee. she is a doctoral student enrolled at the c

it back to the 9th circuit court of appeals, where that stands. >> if the appellate upholds judge robardthe clip that ashley has been commenting about and the supreme court ties 4-4 on a government appeal, that puts the 9th circuit court of appeals ruling in effect because the tie doesn't disturb the decision below. stuart: so the president could lose. >> yes, but remember, this is a preliminary restraining order. this is not permanent. this is a preliminary restraining order until there can be a trial. what would the trial be? it's the state of washington and the state of minnesota versus donald j. trump. the state's arguing in behalf of their residents and taxpayers, that people in those states will be harmed. in my view, the 9th circuit will surprise you and the 9th circuit will say that the states don't have standing to sue. in federal court you can't sue and say i'm here because someone else has been harmed. the person or entity who has been harmed is the one that has to bring the suit. stuart: i'm significant that we have a politicized judiciary that will go against president trump

passing some judgment on the temporary restraining order that was so dramatically put down by judge robardall they're going to do is meet on the phone, telephone conference call like people have at their normal work, these are judges and they are going to decide whether to leave that temporary restraining order in place or reinstate the travel ban. >> so earlier today, in the white house press briefing room, sean spicer said that this is not necessarily a big deal. they believe that this case will be decided on it's merits. they believe that they will win the case talking about whether or not this travel ban is constitutional. and they cited the boston case, explain that for us. >> sean spicer is correct, we are still in early procedure land. and all that's being decided is whether during the coming trials this will be a ban that is enforced or not. he's saying hey, give us a minute, when we get to the trial, we are going to win. you mention that case, this is by judge gordon in boston, this was a case that dealt with some of the merits, arguments in order to decide whether or not to block

judge roe bar robard's decision halt to president trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order. i want to pe that. it puts a stop to it immediately nationwide, so for all those individuals that relief is there. folks can travel to this country as they could before the executive order. that relief is immediate, it is happening right now. >> the attorney general was asked if the timing of the decision might cause any problems coming late in the day on a friday. >> the question went to, hey, because this happened at 4:00, will there be confusion? i'll tell you where there's confusion, the president's executive order. there's no other way to put it, it's keystone cops. it really is. that's not just me speaking, that's republican members of congress. that's what caused the confusion. there's nothing confusing about the judge's order and the federal government will be expected to abide by it and they will. >> joining me now is the executive director of the legal advocacy firm muslim advocates. farhana, walk us through what this means in real terms. you just heard the attorney general

are, do they file an emergency appeal to the supreme court or do they take this back to judge james robards' court in seattle, for the restraining order came out of another let this whole thing play out. that might take several months to get through that hearing process. the danger on the flip side of going to the supreme court, martha, is that there is no tiebreaker. right now, if the vote comes out at a 4-4 tie, under an emergency appeal, that means the decision goes back to the ninth circuit court. they would have standing. the department of justice also has one last thing they can do, en banc, we heard about that several times, the ninth circuit court, they would have nine or ten judges that would give a separate ruling. the three judges who made this ruling would be joined by six or seven other judges and they would have a brand-new hearing on that. as we get more reaction and information about what the next apps might be, we will get back to you. >> martha: "see you in trace, u very much. we will take you to the white house. we have audio comments now from president donald trump. let'

department's lawyer replied, quote, your honor, i don't have that information, unquote, prompting robard to answer his own question. the judge said, let me tell you, the answer to that is none. as best i can tell. you're either arguing on behalf of someone that says we have to protect the united states from these individuals coming from these countries and there's no all of us are ignornt of some areas. what is incredibly problematic is when you have a judicial official, a judge, a federal judge, with a lifetime appointment, not only is ignorant, but uses his ignorance the bases of an illegal constitutional order and then adds arrogance to his ignorance. ignorance by judge robart. as a former judge and chief justice, i can understand who is not a lawyer or somebody who was a lawyer or a form irjudge or a current judge saying this is a so-called judge, because you would like to think judges if they are arrogant, they will be arrogant about their knowledge in some areas that others don't have, instead of being arrogant bout ignorns that puts the american public in jeopardy. the constitutio

henry robards. robert wesley. w. darrell hanzel. frederick langley. paul stuart. robert newman.david warren can. though all silas. james taro. james johnson. tomas maccormack. anthony keith. mark davis. william chisholm. paul moran. william trotter. good morning. frank porter. jared crockett. peter johnson. ronald runyon. william cody. rick sanford. bobby cook. robert goes to. almost done. robert and. the honorable james oxford from the carolina. eugene kachina. douglas holt. william crosser. freddy tisdale. john graham. robert diane. stephen shurtleff. john and shallow. mr. joseph google is the period joseph is being. david add-ins. david stevens. conrad flickr's child. frank fazio. patrick warrick. darryl bishop. ronald chapman. robert steadman. greg james. john block on. michael taylor. jim willis. john thomas p. william weaver. james holland. carlton patterson. dennis brandon. gary drennan. we have made it to the last page. john keyes. robert hensley. don mathis. john mckinney. richard written. tomas bo. walter. thank you. [laughter] edward cal sawyer. john morris. david she

judge robards is a well made mainstream moderate republican background judge.rump says i don't think he is undermining the judiciary. i think he is saying the judges acting more like a politician than a judge. what is also interesting here is the plaintiffs are not people that couldn't demand. the state of washington in the state of minnesota. they don't have the standing to bring this. everything's clear. yeah, that would be great. being proactive... it's how edward jones makes sense of investing. as after a dvt blood clot,ital i sure had a lot to think about. what about the people i care about? ...including this little girl. and what if this happened again? i was given warfarin in the hospital, but wondered, was this the best treatment for me? so i asked my doctor. and he recommended eliquis. eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots and reduces the risk of them happening again. yes, eliquis treats dvt and pe blood clots. eliquis also had significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. both made me turn around my thinking. don't stop eliquis unless

repeatedly lashing out at judge james robard who was confirmed in the senate by a vote of 99-0.st, dismissing the so-called judge calling his ruling ridiculous. later tweeting just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens blame him and court system. people pouring in, bad. the president addinhe instructing homeland security to check people co i attacks on the court. >> the president of the united states has every right to criticize the other two branches of government. >> reporter: the government won't back down. >> president trump ma it clear, he's going to put the safety and security of the american people first. >> reporter: the protests keep spreading. one flying above the super bowl. even as converged on mar-a-lago property during a black tie gala during his first presidential getaway. he expressed confidence about the legal showdown. >> reporter: the u.s. cancelled visas. and his family. granted a visa after a two-year approval process followed by dave. late sunday lating in nashville, welcomed by cheering your open arms make this da

. >> goes to the supreme court, 4-4, robard and a brand new interpretation of the constitution.z: we have judges deciding national security issues, that's what it comes down to. >> and a judge who gave no rational for that whatsoever. the boston judge which of course trump is in favor of did explain the legality of it. the one in california did not which i think is reprehensible. stuart: we're in for trouble if the 9th court of appeals says, sorry, mr. president. ashley: right. stuart: the law speaks otherwise. well, it does not so we shall see about that. as the president was speaking the market opened, we have' opened to the down side and paused with a loss of about 45 points. the dow is holding just above the 20,000 level. that's where it is. on your screens you'll see quite a few individual stocks come rolling by, they're in the news, they're moving, there's a story to each one of them. haven't got time to give it to you, but these are the stocks moving this morning and i also want to point out that the big name technology companies, and in particular mai'm talking abot appl

was, they implemented that thing in such a sloppy fashion -- steve: you know the hearing with judge robardsy was at risk? steve too it is about national security? >> in theoretical terms, steve, you need a specific danger, you need to show evidence why. they came from this town where -- brian: i'll answer your question. john roberts got individuals involved in terror activities in all seven of those county on the books, hands it out. no one disputs, hands out names, addresses locations, arrest. >> that is the names and addresses and locations, arrests you put in the executive order, that is one you keep out. you don't keep out 7-year-old with a heart problem. you look like a dope. brian: he asked for a pause to re-evaluate the vetting system that lets the kid in and keeps terrorist out. >> i understand you want to make a partisan point -- brian: don't diminish my point. no, no. you can not mischaracterize what i'm saying. because senator schummer said the same thing, that you have vet these people. >> you want to protect the country? brian: you have to vet effectively and he want to vet eff

robard has given both sides until the 17th of this month to file a motion and likely he would schedule a hearing soon after or as we talked about, the president could write a new executive order. armond in salt lake city, you oppose the hoping of refugees and immigrants from seven majority muslim countries, why is that? caller: because first of all, does not have anything for them to come. my comment is about the seven muslim. they comment is with the president. if you disagree with any court, any judgment, you can go to court, you can appeal, you can follow-up. but not right to -- political because we cannot accuse any of judges making decisions regarding to their politics. if that is the way we are going to run the country, unfortunately, we will not have any decent lawful country. mr. president, you were elected to protect our constitution, you are not there to accuse judges for -- if accusing, i have to accuse you or another one. host: what about the record of the ninth circuit court? senator tom cotton, of arkansas, a republican, he put out a statement saying that no -- this misgu