you referenced sir robert peel, my personal idol a hero.sir robert peel, who created the british metropolitan police london in 1829. and he nine principles of policing. and if you were to read them and i encourage read them they're in the book in several instances they're more appropriate today than they were back in 1829. the most the five most basic words in his first principle were the basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime in disorder. prevent crime and disorder. the seventies and eighties were focusing on responding crime and doing nothing about responding or preventing the growing homeless populations on our streets are going to soar the graffiti, prostitution, abandoned cars that what people understood was that what people see day are those so-called quality of those so-called broken windows. a judge filling in jim wilson. so what's really, really about the idea that what you every day in your neighborhood is effectively what shapes your opinion about is it a safe neighborhood? is it a bad neighborhood? and whil

.— been efficient since robert peel, - secretary. i been efficient since robert peel, secretary. claims. well, maybe it's your tuvonetn— claims. well, maybe it's your european human— 33 well, maybe it's your european human rights law that's uet— european human rights law that's caused—as well,- european human rights law that'si caused—as well, and caused the problems as well, and i caused the problems as well, and t-we-tt— caused the problems as well, and t-we-tt-t— caused the problems as well, and i-we'll-a chance- caused the problems as well, and i-we'll-a chance to- i hope we'll get a chance to tteeuee— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a bit- i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a bit more, i tntnt. — discuss this a bit more, i tntnt. ant— discuss this a bit more, i think. “: discuss this a bit more, i think. ' “: c: discuss this a bit more, i- think. and maybe we'll have an item on it if i'm correct. but the i mean, to take this back to the i mean, to take this back to the men

, the secretary. been efficient since robert peel, the-secretary. was peel, the same secretary. your european human— 15 well, maybe it's your european human rights law that's cauoa— european human rights law that's caused-problems— european human rights law that's caused problems as well, caused the problems as well, and i caused the problems as well, and 1 nobo— caused the problems as well, and 1 nobo-ao1— caused the problems as well, and 1 nobo-ao1 a— caused the problems as well, and i hope-get a chance- caused the problems as well, and i hope get a chance to i hope we'll get a chance to dbcuoo— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a— i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a bit- i hope we'll get a chance to discuss this a bit more, i 111 — discuss this a bit more, i 111 1na— discuss this a bit more, i think. 11: discuss this a bit more, i think. ' 11: 1 discuss this a bit more, i- think. and maybe we'll have an item on it if i'm correct. but the i mean, to take this back to the i mean, to take this back to the health issue, i

the police tetee— robert peel set up. the police tetee tet. — robert peel set up.irst phoned me, i your researcher first phoned me, t twewewt— your researcher first phoned me, t twewewt .— your researcher first phoned me, ttwewowt . wew— your researcher first phoned me, i thought , you know, she lost i thought, you know, she lost twe— i thought, you know, she lost tee-wew— i thought, you know, she lost the-you working- i thought, you know, she lost the you working there the plot. if you working there tee — the plot. if you working there too-something- the plot. if you working there too-something ,- the plot. if you working there too-something , i- too hard or something, i eewttw-t— too hard or something, i couldn't-it.- too hard or something, i couldn't it. and couldn't believe it. and i tttetettw— couldn't believe it. and i literally had— couldn't believe it. and i literally had to immediately go ewttwe— literally had to immediately go online because— literally had to immediately go online because i've been like, wew— online because i've been like, wee—weeteth onl

you need to look at sir robert peel, who was prime minister just before and after ministerjust beforeinto the firm. not quite sure how that works anyway. the eveni— sure how that works anyway. the eveni is— sure how that works anyway. the event is expected— sure how that works anyway. the event is expected to be watched, of event is expected to be watched, oi by— event is expected to be watched, of course, by hundreds of niiiions— of course, by hundreds of millions of— of course, by hundreds of millions of people across the woni.— millions of people across the worio. n— millions of people across the world. a masterclass in state pogeonirv. — world. a masterclass in state pageantry. despite the king's oesision— pageantry. despite the king's oesision io— pageantry. despite the king's decision to slim— pageantry. despite the king's decision to slim down the occasion. and _ decision to slim down the occasion. and of course, the oiiisioi— occasion. and of course, the official- recycled . official invite on recycled paper-— official invite on recycled paper- iei-s— official invite on recycl

behind the leak in the dobbs case people like alito were worried john roberts would go around and try to soften the opinion and peeljuris prudence, there's a lot of distrust i think that somewhat makes roberts unable to sort of persuade them or have any moral suasion abilities when it comes to these ethics matters. i agree with david that leaves it in the hands of congressional democrats. even before this latest gorsuch revelation came out, my group commissioned a poll with hart research that came out last week that showed that 70% of the voters believe that congress should investigate ethics scandals resolving around supreme court justices that was even before this gorsuch thing. it was before the latest harlan crow/clarence thomas story they would have the wind at their backs in pursuing this last week sheldon whitehouse did an event run by a privilege organization run by my friend adam green he chairs the subcommittee on the courts he says regardless of what happens with this full committee hearing that dick durbin is going to run, he's going to try to extend an offer to john roberts to come testify. he says he'

but when you peel that back, if you go to mississippi, you go to alabama, it's not martin luther king day is king lee day. you go to other places around the country. there's still robert lee day. there's still confederate day. and you get this very mixed, confused message that somehow there's some equivalency or there's some kind of, you know, way in which there is these these individual sort of mesh when in fact, they don't at all. and so that's putting andrew jackson or leaving andrew jackson on in $20 bill continues this mythology that this is someone who the nation should be honoring. as will points out, he not only supervised massacre. he was involved in massacres of native americans for both personal greed purposes, lands that were taken from some of the native americans. he and friends of his were able to get, but also his due to added to that some people's lives are worthy. in some people's lives are were not. and so and he's also seen as kind of the father of democracy in the sense that he was one of the founders of the democratic party. he lost the 1824 election. he won the popular vote. he's had plural plurality in the popular vote, but he didn't win the el