by overturning roe v. wade>> after the most dramatic supreme court ruling in decades, there was rage. even violence. americans had a message for their highest court. >> we won't go back. >> across the country, tens of thousands took to the streets. >> you ain't seen nothing yet. >> what i want you to do now -- >> the constitutional scholar noah feldman says america now sees a court poisoned by politics. >> the current court is taking all of its weight and putting it behind popular conservative positions. and the reason that's so scary from the standpoint of the united states is that we don't have another institution whose job it is to protect the most vulnerable, to protect the rule of law. >> feldman is a liberal who testified in favor of donald trump's impeachment. >> president trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors. >> yet he also supported the nomination of amy coney barrett. >> she is a first class lawyer. i believe we need the smartest and best people. >> the right way to think about

the so called restrictions that have resulted from overturning of roe v wade or the harpy laws those, those were in place even before rose roe vs wade. if you could, your heartbeat and abortion was not certain states had those, those were i'm talking about the restrictions that have been in the u. s. right? you're right, so you know, i just wanted to address that the roe v wade thing is like the general consensus about roe v wade and what people are deeming it to mean is a complete fallacy. because i think there's a massive misconception because abortion hasn't been bound in the us. right. and the reason why roe v wade, i think was overturned, is because abortion rights were never part of the constitution in the 1st place. so now goes back to obviously each individual state on a case by case circumstance, which means abortion is still act accessible in almost every single state. but this is actually a win for both sides. whether you are pro life, whether your pro choice am cecily, a big win, if you, if you believe in democracy. but secondly, i think abortion laws may have a ripple eff

so you know, i just wanted to address at the roe v wade thing is like the general consensus about roe v wade and what people are deeming it to mean is a complete fallacy. because i think there's a massive misconception because abortion hasn't been bound in the u. s. right. and the reason why roe v wade, i think was overturned, is because abortion rights were never part of the constitution in the 1st place. so now goes back to obviously each individual state on a case by case circumstance, which means abortion is still at accessible in almost every single state. but this is actually a win for both sides. whether you are pro life, whether your pro choice am cecily, a big win, if you, if you believe in democracy. but secondly, i think abortion laws may have a ripple effect in india. but only i think in the metropolitan city areas where people have, you know, become more progressive or they could because because of western ideologies and particularly the american way of life, which is obviously now become like a standard for living amongst a lot of people who live in the cities, but in th

they made that decision under the provisions of roe v. wade. the decision to overturn the roe v. de went into effect and we saw states across the country put politicians into the room with the families. my opponent said she supported the texas law that even in the case of rape or incest a woman cannot get access to an abortion. i want to reinstate roe v. wade at the federal level so we take politicians out of the office and allow women to make their health care choices. late-term abortion is hard. women have the right to be able to make that decision according to their own needs and health care. i've talked to so many women who were just frightened today. they do not know if they can turn to a doctor. i talked to a woman from texas in turbo circumstances. she cannot talk to her friends because she was afraid of the consequences to them. let's put this back in my hands of people themselves. let's not have a country that has different states with different regulations. it is impacting us here in washington. we have providers come to washington to provide reproductive care for fear w

the vast majority of the public believes in roe v. wade, which has withstood multiple challenges along the way, including in planned parenthood versus casey. it was republican appointees, presidential appointees to the court, nominees to the court, who gave us roe v. wade. justice blackmun himself, it was a majority of republican nominees that gave us roe v. wade. justice white was in the minority on it. and what we see today is a court that has been defined by the right -- by the rightward march of the gop. they all were nominated through a series of convention planks and litmus tests where the only people who could advance within federalist society in gop circles were those who swore they would overthrow roe versus wade, as much as they could make it public so they could still, you know, credibly good to congress and say roe v. wade is a precedent. and people actually fell for that, or at least pretend that they fell for that. i mean, it was so obvious what was going on. so, do i think that they will change their mind and feel chastened

10 years ago, you told me roe v. wadeld have got stripped away, i would have said, what are you talking about? it's been here, it's on the books since the 1970's. but here we are in 2022, no roe v. wade. laura: did young voters raise abortion access in the harvard poll? alan: absolutely. for young voters, abortion is one of the top issues, especially for young democrats. and we feel it might be affecting the vote choice as well. democrats increased the vote margin among young female voters nine points compared to the spring. and we see that they have made inroads. one of the reasons that might be is because young voters are concerned that their rights might be taken away. what he said was correct, in the eyes of young voters. we're seeing a succession of political crisis after crisis. young people see our democracy, and they see that it is failing. they see that it is in trouble. and they see that their basic rights are being threatened. so -- and one of those is the right to the -- the choice for an abortion. laura: alan

when roe v. wadeas first over the cone -- overturned, they reduced 816 week ban of abortion --a 16 week ban of abortion. there was a decision -- to return it to a pre-territorial law which was before arizona joined the union, which banned abortion at six weeks. that band was challenge and is currently terribly -- temporarily cost. arizonans are short -- are not sure when the band will be --ban will be resumed. democrats have been discussing abortion a lot more and that a strategic. the vast majority of democrats don't support the ban. small portion of republicans also so -- don't support it. whether it will be important enough to motivating -- motivate people to vote, that will be an individual response. we do know that the ban is not well supported and we see hobbs will talk more about this issue then lake will. host: of the cans are focusing on the issue of border security -- republicans are votes kissing -- focusing on the issue aborting security -- border security. guest: i would say that my impre

five years before roe v. wade, dr. king stated the art of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice. the decision in roe suggested women's equality and reproductive freedom within reach. with roe came greater access to contraception and to sex education him and a dramatic decline in maternal mortality. for nearly 50 years roasted and precedents for the right to reproductive privacy. however, today ast we gather roughly 120 days post dobler versus jackson women's health which overturn roe and planned parenthood, we gather at a time in which many women are fearful about their health caree rights. notably, they are concerned and dis- convening extend beyond abortion. women are worried about reproductive health care for administration the menopause, and tragically to maternal mortality. these are matters that are -- [inaudible] for this reason we could not be prouder to welcome charles johnson, dr. sharonso malone, ta murtha, jennifer weiss-wolf, and our own visiting law professor michele goodwin. to discuss wh

roe v. wade, we want to be able to codify roe v. wade. we know, if we get two more senators, we will be able to do that and so much more. we will be able to get around the filibuster. every, day american people understand what mean-spirited republicans did with roe v. wade. women understand it. if we have a high percentage of women who have already voted and who are voting, and they have over 50% of the vote. we understand, if you take away this freedom, let me just tell you what is next. we are going to then send us backwards when we talk about interracial marriages, when we talk about lgbtq. we know we have to continue to fight because everything is on the line. i think we pay a little bit of attention to the polls. more importantly than that, we want to change it. we have to go out and vote. we still have another day of early vote. we have in-person vote. we need so many people right through election day. it reminds them of what john louis and you and -- and others went through for the right to vote. >> when you look at the fact that a

republicans are opposed to roe v. wade, or post any gun reform, opposed to increasing the minimum wage. when we say that, yes, the democrats have moved to laughed but that country has moved the left. gay marriage. almost every single issue, we've moved laughed. the center is better aligned to where the democrats are then where the republican are on every single issue. >> i think we need to leave room for audience questions. lacks shirt. >> i'm going to ask patricia to call on more questions. >> chuck, asked, what do you think that the impact is of the january 6 committee hearings, if any? >> substantively, i think it had a huge impact. ed is absolutely necessary in the moment we are in to hold people accountable. subsidence will -- subsidence will he -- it is good for our country. in the moment. it helped democrats combined with a lot of other things in the summer, combined with the supreme court decision and a number of other things that raised the standard for democrats where they were behind and then by the end of the s

that is not the roe v. wade standard, tim. as much as you call me an extremist, you are the extremist on this issue. the other thing that's important to talk about, tim ryan talks about this poor girl who was raped, the 10-year-old girl ha -- who had to travel to indiana to get an abortion. obviously, an incredibly tragic situation. i'm the father of a nine-month-old girl. it's unbelievable. i cannot even imagine what it would be like to have that happen to your child or to have that happen to yourself if you're a young woman. that little girl was raped by an illegal immigrant. and both the media and tim ryan need to be honest about the fact that she would never have been raped in the first place if tim ryan had done his job on border security. let's talk about the full picture and the full slate of exceptions, absolutely, but let's not let the democrats off the hook for letting me career -- leading these -- leading these -- letting these career criminals into our state to fray -- to prey on our little girls in the first place

that is odd because that is what roe v. wade did, and today are embracing roe v. wade. the radical democrats on this committee just a year ago, voted in lockstep to pass the most radical abortion bill lifting any restrictions on abortion. that was the woman's health protection act. everybody, every democrat did in the house, except for one. senator claire. it failed in the senate. i say is interesting. the fact that you're saying wait a second, there are state louse that might conflict with what we believe. the new orthodoxy. that is exactly what roe v. wade did. i did not hear any republicans or conservatives say let's pack the court. you should hear it now. that is one of the articles i will submit for the record. to list democrats who call for packing the court because they do not like the dobbs decision. a minute ago the gentleman from maryland said let's not go down the way of saudi arabia and iran, apparently he would go down the way of china and north korea. that is what the bill he voted for did. took away all restrictions on abortion. that is pretty radical if

that opinion, like the supreme court opinion leaked earlier this year, overturning roe v. wade, that is written by samuel alito. evangelical minister rob shank told the new york times he obtained advanced notice of the samuel alito opinion in the hobby lobby case that overturned a provision of the affordable care act, requiring employers to provide contraception coverage and health care plans. the times reports that it is the dark money that senator whitehouse has been following, that created the supreme court leak. the times reports, quote, mr. shrink recruited wealthy donors like gayle wright and her husband, donald, encouraging them to invite some of the justices to meals, to their vacation homes, or private clubs. he advised allies to contribute money to the supreme court historical society, then mingled with justices at its functions. he ingratiated himself with court officials who could help give him access, records show. mr. schenck said his aim was not to change minds, but rather to stiffen the resolve of the courts conservatives and taking uncompromising stance that co

host: the issue of roe v. wade is an issue the democrats have focused on quite a bit in this election. individual state laws now. the law of the land on that issue. what is the law on abortion in arizona and how have you seen it impact this election cycle? guest: the abortion laws in arizona have been dramatic and fluid. when it was first overturned, arizona resumed a 15 week ban on abortions prior to roe v. wade. there was a decision by arizona state officials to return it to a pre-territorial law, before arizona joined the union, before women could vote for example, which banned abortion at six weeks. so almost a complete ban on abortion. that was challenged and is temporarily paused. arizonans are not sure when and if the six week ban will be resumed. at this point there is a 15 week ban. a lot of confusion and concern. as you mentioned, democrats have been discussing abortion a lot more than republicans have. the vast majority of democrats do not support the spam and a small majority of republicans also oppose

>> tim ryan: i think we go back to roe v. wade. [cheers and applause] >> tim ryan: roe v. in the third term of -- in the third term of roe v. wade, you could only do it if there was some kind of medical emergency. we don't want j.d. vance and ted cruz and all these guys in the doctor's office. >> bret: you think that the democratic bills to codify, so-called roe v. wade have some sort of limit in them? because we haven't seen it. the one that was in the house did not have a limit. so you have a limit? >> tim ryan: my personal view is we go back to roe v. wade. we move away from this chaos that we are in now. we had 50 years of case law. we had stability. and now we have women and we have doctors, bret, who won't perform what they need to perform on a woman whose life is in jeopardy and then the doctor says i'm sorry, i have my own kids at home and i'm not going to prison over this stuff. >> martha: i guess at what point, 22 weeks is the law in ohio right now. that's more than four and a half months. it's five months pregnant. i mean, five months is a long time of being pre

so they're up six fold basically in the wake of roe v. wade.of people, including some women we talked to yesterday they're worried about other reproductive options like sterilization and vasectomies taken away in the future. they're doing it now just in case that happens. jose. >> maggie vespa in springfield. i thank you very much. >>> now to new reporting from "the washington post," which points to a shift in how latino voters view abortion rights and the importance when deciding how to vote. joining us now the reporter from "the washington post." great seeing you. what are you learning in your reporting? >> so the post poll that we conducted not too long ago found that latinos, the majority of them are in favor of abortion rights. that goes against a lot of long-held assumptions and beliefs we've had about this generally democratic electorate, conservative on issues like guns and abortion. but we found the opposite is true. latino voters are very much in support of abortion rights. and therefore, could be, you know, that issue could be key in

shares feelings of shock and betrayal after the leak of the draft opinion he authored to overturn roe v. wadeng on the challenges collecting sales taxes for out-of-state purchases for the senate finance committee. and saturdna

do you feel like there is more of a case now for the midterms to codify roe v. wade? even though -- there was that one extra vote you. our retaining control the senate. even if you don't necessarily have the votes that you need to codify legislation like roe v. wade. you have a stronger case now more than ever. >> absolutely. that is what the american people shoulders election cycle. you also had state results. there were the results in michigan. that is a purple state. it came out very strongly. it did not want government to intervene in the most intimate and private decision between a woman in her doctor. you also have states that are looking at ways to put it into their constitution. they are talking about how you can get people the right to read productive health care. california did that. i just think that what the american people are saying is that they won't government out of our bedroom, out of our most private decisions. >> you can convince the moderate republicans to help codify roe v. wade. >> i think some of them will absolutely support it. you have a numbe

if god can overturn roe v wade, he abortion. if god can overturn roe v wade. he can _ abortion. urn roe v - wade, he can do anything. and ending same-sex marriage. _ wade, he can do anything. and ending same-sex marriage. yes, _ wade, he can do anything. and ending same-sex marriage. yes, i _ wade, he can do anything. and ending same-sex marriage. yes, i want - wade, he can do anything. and ending same-sex marriage. yes, i want to - same-sex marriage. yes, i want to exclude certain — same-sex marriage. yes, i want to exclude certain types _ same-sex marriage. yes, i want to exclude certain types of _ exclude certain types of relationships, sexual relationships, from marriage, it is special to us. it is in _ from marriage, it is special to us. it is in the — from marriage, it is special to us. it is in the bible, it is something we really— it is in the bible, it is something we really care about. you it is in the bible, it is something we really care about.— it is in the bible, it is something we really care about. you want a government _ we really care about. you want a governmen

it was roe v. wade being overturned.nd of interesting that the dams are still going to lose the house. it should have been worse, but it wasn't. that's because the supreme court expended the political capital that was built for decades to overturn roe v. wade. that was baked into the cake. the hill at the right chose to die on was roe v. wade, and this might have been the right time to do it because they've still got the house. we don't know, but this is an achievement. what is the point of building political power if you don't spend it? that is what made this so close. if you are a constitutionalist and a pro-lifer, you should be very happy and stepping back after the selection and going "that didn't go as good as i wanted, but roe v. wade overturn and --" willing to die on the hill, because that's made of millions of unborn children, so i should be willing to fight for that long-term, short-term, decades. if you are just looking too close at the trees, you are not seeing the forest. jessica is right. he said it last we

v wade. has the same principles on which those that were decided that makes the supreme court's reversal of roe v wade all the more shocking and several of my colleagues have maintained even if we revisit the cases since there is no case xchallenging that currently makes its way up to the supreme court. given the supreme court's use of a shadow docket not reaching the supreme court faster than ever before. and then with a concurring opinion of justice clarence thomas with the dobbs decision and in his opinion to explicitly said the rationale used to overturn roe v wade should be there and with the rights of contraception and same-sex marriage. essentially providing an open invitation to litigators across the country and the supreme court should not be in a position with families with the stroke of a pen and congress is acting with the endorsement for the american people. but the majority of democrats and republicans and this legislation unitesni americans with the respect for marriage act weea can ease the fear that millions of same-sex and interracial couples have to their freedoms and their r

allowing easy access to abortion, too, in the post—roe v wade world, but as a policy, not as a universalt impossible, but perhaps way more likely is a state—by—state idea of the nation — in a sense, the original idea. fractured, but still in business. justin webb, bbc news, washington. i'm joined now by our correspondent in washington, nomia iqbal. great to get you on the programme at a time that i'm sure is a great to get you on the programme at a time that i'm sure is a very great to get you on the programme at a time that i'm sure is a very busy for you. a time that i'm sure is a very busy foryou. final a time that i'm sure is a very busy for you. final polls outjust hours before election day, what are they telling us? before election day, what are they tellin: us? ~ �* , ., ., telling us? well, it's not a presidential _ telling us? well, it's not a presidential election, - telling us? well, it's not a presidential election, and | telling us? well, it's not a i presidential election, and the midterm elections usually don't get this much fanfare — but it very much has the feel of a pre

[cheers and applause] i run on the roe v. wade. i celebrate the demise of roe v. wade. choice we have in front of us. this is one of the biggest races in this nation, and they expect over $100 million to try to destroy me, and here we are still standing. [cheers and applause] and we will need every one of you to vote and tell your friends and families to make sure that you are willing to turn out every vote. [cheers and applause] and my last, my last favor that every one of you would be to please make sure we send dr. oz back across the bridge. [cheers and applause] and send me to washington, d.c. so that i can stand and fight for all of you. thank you. thank you. [cheers and applause] ♪ >> please welcome back to the states the 44th president of the united states, barack obama. ♪ pres. obama: hello, philadelphia! [cheers and applause] are you fired up yet? [cheers and applause] man, i was backstage. i getting fired up. i am ready to go. [cheers and applause] it is good to be back in pennsylvania. [cheers and applause] it is good to be back in the center right of the spo

so you know, i just wanted to address that the roe v wade thing is like the general consensus about roe v wade and what people are deeming it to mean is a complete fallacy. because i think there's a massive misconception because abortion hasn't been bound in the u. s. right. and the reason why roe v wade, i think was overturned, is because abortion rights were never part of the constitution in the 1st place. so now goes back to obviously each individual state on a case by case circumstance, which means abortion is still at accessible in almost every single state. but this is actually a win for both sides, whether you are pro life, whether you're pro choice and sadly a big win if you, if you believe in democracy. but secondly, i think abortion laws may have a ripple effect in india. but only i think in the metropolitan city areas where people have, you know, become more progressive or they could because because of western ideologies and particularly the american way of life, which is obviously now become like a standard for living amongst a lot of people who live in the cities, but in th

when you say don't want to, i think we go back to roe v. wade. roe v. wade was in the third term. e] in the third term of roe v. wade, you could only do it if there is some kind of medical emergency. we don't want j.d. vance and ted cruz and all these guys in the doctor's office. >> he said you want to ban abortion in ohio and across this country, is that true? >> look, i'm pro-life. i am pro-life. now, there is a federal piece of legislation moving through the senate right now, and here's what it does. very simply, it provides reasonable exceptions but it also sets a minimum national standard and i think that's a good idea. we should not, in this country, be awarding babies who can feel pain, who are fully formed, that's my view. and i'm certainly willing to support legislation that would make that a reality. [applause] >> interesting, the crowd like both of their answers but they were completely -- antithetical. >> what's interesting about that, we see that they're really going after the same voters, and that's part of the reason that we see this race so tight. because coming int

for example, with the overturning of roe v. wade.ung people see that as an attack on their own rights. we also see that young lgbtq people have even higher rates of feeling that the rights are under attack. they again, they see this as a threat to democracy. they see this as a threat to our society. a lot of the rights that have been the foundation of our society are under threat in the eyes of young americans. and this is one of the reasons why young americans are so politically engaged and why they're continuing to turn out at record numbers in 2018 and 2020. and again we expected in 2022. >> alan zang, thank you so much for your time. >> of course, thank you. ♪ judy: today the u.s. called for iran to lose its position on a un commission that promotes female empowerment, as punishment for iran's ongoing crackdown against protestors. nationwide demonstrations are now in their seventh week, sparked by the death of a 22-year-old woman in police custody. nick schifrin and producer zeba warsi have been speaking to students in iran, and

we'll roe v. wade is clearly on the minds of voters.last week, jennifer, with the secure senate majority for the democrats, can we see a run again? it's codifying roe into federal law? >> i think you should probably expect that, katie. i would also say my friend mike -- who knows these midterm numbers better than almost anybody else i know was talking on social media last night about the idea that eight to 10% of gop voters in many states actually crossed lines and voted democrat in this race. and you really have to question whether or not roe v. wade was a part of that. i'm looking forward to finding out how many of those folks are women. i think there is an assumption that was there that every republican is always going to vote against the idea of qualifying roe v. wade. and i think for a lot of women as, there including the republican party that issue is not just about pro-life or not being pro-life but about privacy, your individual right to control and make decisions about your body. i would be surprised if we did not see a run at

you know, in light of the overturning of roe v wade. how important is the youth vote to the mid term elections? very important, particularly in a mid term election because the fact is a lot of young voters just don't turn out in a mid term election. a lot of people just don't turn out period in a mid term election, and we're going to see probably less than 50 percent of americans turn out in this next election. and we're going to see even lower turnout among younger voters because that's just what happens. and people get really excited about the presidential election and they're much less excited over who the governor might be, who the secretary of state might be, or the attorney general beer who their member of congress might be. even though those things are extremely important. and in some cases affect their lives more than who the president is. and so i think there is a growing realization that rights can be taken away in this country. i think roe v wade was an extremely illuminating moment for a lot of younger people who thought wil

after roe v wade was overturned, it makes no exceptions for rape or incest. it's totally out of step with what voters in wisconsin want. and so i hope this will be an illuminating moment for younger people to get out and defend those rights. but my concern is that not enough people are paying attention to mid term elections. not enough people are paying attention to what state races do and not enough people are connecting. the value of their vote to change, i think is a frustration here that democrats have to address in terms of getting but developed quickly younger people. so i want you to help me look forward a bit, you know, given all of the voting issues, giving all the tax on the voting rights act. what are we looking at beyond midterms and other than the court fight, which are essential? what should individuals be doing to protect voting rights? so i think, you know, advocating to your local and state officials because they're the ones that really control a lot of elections and that's going to be true. unfortunately, more and more as the courts are less

allowing easy access to abortion, too, in the post—roe v wade world, but as a policy, not as a universaln america. it's not impossible, but perhaps way more likely is a state—by—state idea of the nation — in a sense, the original idea. fractured, but still in business. justin webb, bbc news, washington. one of britain's most popular comedians, peter kay, is to go back on the road with his first live tour in 12 years. his last stand—up tour achieved a guinness world record for the biggest—selling run of all time, performing in front of more than a million people. our entertainment correspondent colin paterson reports. hey, look, it's peter kay. hey, garlic bread! peter kay announcing his first stand—up for 12 years in a very peter kay way. when are you back on tour? next month. his last record—breaking tour was seen by more than a million people. but in 2017, plans to go back on the road were cancelled due to unforeseen family circumstances, right after the tour had sold out. this is 96.5 bolton fm... the long wait had added to the excitement. in his home town, bolton fm were dedicating t

roe v. wade could heaven women's health care. this is just over three how hers. >> the meeting looking to order. without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a recess of the committee at any time. we now recognize myself for an opening statement. let me begin by taking a moment to acknowledge the ongoing devastation caused by hurricane ian. my thoughts are with the people of florida, and with the surrounding communities being affected by this terrible storm. i hope that everyone impacted will stay safe and quickly receive the resources the day need. i'm grateful to all of the first responders, the local state and federal officials who are working around the clock to respond to these natural disaster of the presidents very engaged. we are all hopeful. today's hearing is the force that i have held to examine the decades-long effort of republican politicians to bulldoze abortion rights straight into the ground. since the supreme court's decision in dobbs versus jackson, republican led state

justin: the supreme court famously with roe v. wadee all american women the right to an abortion. >> this great nation will end your -- will endure. justin: it didn't matter who was in power, from franklin roosevelt and the new deal, the direction seemed clear. even the opponent of liberal america, ronald reagan, who changed so much in the 1980's, didn't alter the fundamental view of national progress and national rights that by definition everyone could access. >> i am not frightened by what lies ahead and i don't believe the american people are frightened by what lies ahead. justin: now roe v. wade is gone and perhaps a lot more. the trump appointed justices on the supreme court have got the bit between their teeth. the conservative majority seem to want a grand reset, along with millions of aricans who never really signed up fm national progress, national rights. they want less power in washington and much more in the individual states. the birth of this new settlement, if that's what it is, is hard-fought. the governors from texas

>> i think we go back to roe v. wade. it was in the third term. in the third term of roe v. , you could only do it if there was some kind of medical emergency. we don't want jd vance and ted cruz and these guys in the doctor's office. >> he said you want to ban abortion in ohio and across the country. is that true? >> look, i'm pro life. i am pro life. now, there is a federal piece of legislation moving through the senate right now. here is what it does. it sets a minimum national standard and i think that is a good idea. we should not be aborting babies who can feel pain, who are fully formed. that's my view and i'm willing to support legislation that would make that a reality. >> we go to allen. >> it is interesting, the crowd liked both answers but they were completely antithetical. >> they are going after the same voters. that is part of the reason we see this race so tight. the republican candidate had the edge. trump won this state twice by eight points. the climate favors the republican, and the state already has a democratic senator, so the question is would they send

i will codify roe v. wade, he will vote against it. it is clear only one of us is going to stand up to extremism, whether it is coming from the far right or the far left. i think it is no surprise that there was only one of us here who has attracted support from all parties in our district, who has support from democrats and independents. nobody is crossing the aisle to support tom kean. in that spirit, i ask for your support to represent this district, talking to people, doing town halls, listening to their concerns and fighting for you in the congress for another two years. thank you very much. >> what is clear is that tom malinowski listens to nancy pelosi 100% of the time. if he goes to washington dc as he has asked the last four years, he will only vote for more spending and more things that will make our state and our country worse. i will vote to support to shorten supply chains. i have always worked to find the common ground for the people who want to make new jersey home. tonight, i am asking for your vote to solve problems, r

just months after the draft ruling, the decision to overturn roe v. wadedentally which was written by justice alito. my panel is back with me. basil, what can we make of the fact that a supreme court justice is having dinner with donors that could influence major decisions? >> the two words that stared at me for the excerpt of that article was faith and donations. the reason that stands out to me is that faith is what essentially was driving the work that was being done. they were on this mission to change not only the court, but to really change national policy. they were on this height mission, using donations as a means of developing infrastructure to implement all of that. my takeaway from this is that yes, i assumed that this happens all the time, quite frankly. for alito to have been at the center of this now, and he was such a leading voice when the dobbs decision was leaked, it's part of the hypocrisy of the court. what we are seeing now, you can add that to justice thomas's behavior. not recusing himself of so many things that he should've. it lea

a draft version of the supreme court decision to overturn roe v. wadepress, to a place where i work, in fact, politico. but the dobbs case may not have been the only major supreme court case to be leaked. as the supreme court investigates that monumental leak of the dobbs opinion, new york times has learned somebody has come forward, alleging another breach. years ago. the landmark case involving rules around insurance coverage, birth control. times reports as quote, in a letter to chief justice john g. roberts junior, and interviews with the new york times, the reverend robert shank said he was told the outcome of the case weeks before it was announced. he used that information to prepare a public relations push, records show, he said that at the last minute, he tipped off the president of the craft store chain owned by christian invent illegals which was winning, that was the winning party in the case. the case in question is -- 5 to 4 supreme court ruling from 2014, which allowed privately held companies to object on religious grounds to an obama car