i would askassange, about roger stone.n march 2016, he posted on facebook that he "never denied that assange and i had a mutual friend who told me wikileaks had the goods on hrc and would begin disclosures in october. he did and they did. i did not admit it. i announced it." heteries of tweets, which later deleted, roger stone also attacked a woman who challenged him on twitter writing -- [bleep."pid, stupid p[b i now want to talk about the latest roger stone going to testify the senate intelligence committee and what came out of that. your response to that? >> roger stone has centrally democrats all of his life and eastern exactly the same thing in order to elevate himself. that is all. you look at our statement that the time, he did not say anything that i had not been saying in public at the time. amy: the me turn to democratic harassment adam schiff speaking at the hearing -- >> i would like to say the effectiveness of that trolling, just shows you how mad the u.s. legal culture has become. as roger stone presented as

as roger stone presentnted as a critical -- credible person in a statement? i think his issue is that justice to trump and whether you ththink trump p or roger stotons crediblele -- if heas someththing to wryry about, whwy would he be deliberately plplayg it off constantly? he doesn't have anything to worry about. amamy:hat do you memean? he e doesn't have anynything to worry about because there is s o back chahannel. therere was never a baback chan. he proroced no evidence. he i is simply trolling g the absolu -- thehey want to be trolled. they d don't carere what thtrtrh is at all.l. all theyey want, s some little propaganda point t that they can ususe to sehowow sisfy thehe ridiculousus fantasies aboutut taking dowown trump in n retiono russia. if r roger stone i going to o hp with thahat, they llll give hima platform. ththat is what they have done. you saw what happened as s a result. yoyou haveo a admire the e foott -- j just a andnd guess the cleverness in whwhh he has donoe it i in some sense.e. whwhat is not honorable, , even thought t is really y tat

we see right there from paul manafort to michael flynn, don jr., jared kushner, carter page, and roger stone who was banned from twitter yesterday because of an over the weekend twitter rant that he had. do you think that when it comes to the big reveal, that it may not be just one person, but there could be a larger reveal tomorrow of certain members of this team?

. >>> coming up next, roger stone speaking about grilling on capitol hill on the russia probe.n denny heck joins me next to give his impressions. what's critical thinking like? a basketball costs $14. what's team spirit worth? (cheers) what's it worth to talk to your mom? what's the value of a walk in the woods? the value of capital is to create, not just wealth, but things that matter. morgan stanley i can't wait for her to have that college experience that i had. the classes, the friends, the independence. and since we planned for it, that student debt is the one experience, i'm glad she'll miss when you have the right financial advisor, life can be brilliant. ameriprise >>> trump's surrogate roger stone went before the house intelligence committee on tuesday. here's what he said after the three-hour grilling. >> i expressed my view that i'm aware of no evidence whatsoever of collusion by the russian state or anyone in the trump campaign. or anyone associated with donald trump. >> joining me now is washington congressman denny heck, member of the house intel committee. always

roger stone made a tweet directly to guccifer 2.0. there are now allegations that roger stone colluded with guccifer 2.0 in the release of emails. host: we go to ohio, republican mine. guest: hello. caller: hello. i have a question. i want to know why "the washington examiner" is not investigating the dnc. guest: what about the dnc in particular? caller: the hacking. the one girl, i forget her name, but she was dealing with the ukrainians. they were dealing with the ukrainians, and stuff like that, why aren't you investigating the democrats? host: do you know anything about that? guest: i cannot speak to that woman you mentioned. i can tell you that for all media companies, and have worked in radio, nonprofit journalism, ,nd now i work for the examiner resources are very thin. i don't mean that as a criticism. it is just the media reality. not everything can be investigated. some of these things that i know the public is clamoring for investigations on, it would honestly take the resources of two or three people doing investigating fo

and then what you get is people like roger stone advertising we've got lots to come in the suggestion would be that somehow it was communicated inside the trump campaign that russia was working -- >> dana: another way to look at it, that they were blowing the kid off. 30 years old, responsible for his actions but that he's overzealous and they are like please go away. this is not going to be a high-level thing. i don't know if that's what's going to happen. he pleaded guilty. >> greg: enough of the professor. where is marianne? the manafort scandal, when you look at it, it's a problem he hoped to have because it means you won. they hired this guy lingo he's a pretty dark character. but if we win, we will deal with it then. they let him go pretty quick because they used him. >> kimberly: he was a specialist. >> greg: he was charged with conspiracy against the u.s., defined as an effort to defraud the u.s. have you ever paid your dog babysitter in cash? that is the broader -- [laughter] >> dana: that's not me not paying it. >> kimberly: it is jasper. >> greg: do you know what defrauding

r, roger stone i stirring things up. i was playing golf days ago... love golf. i used to love golf., what happened? i was having a good round, and then my friend, sheila, right as i was stepping into the tee box mentioned a tip a pro gave her. no. yep. did it help? it completely ruined my game. well, the truth is, that advice was never meant for you. i like you. you want to show me your swing? it's too soon. get advice that's right for you. investment management services from td ameritrade. >>> i made the case that the accusation that i knew about john podesta's e-mail hack in advance was false, that i knew about the content and source of the wikileaks disclosures regarding hillary clinton was false. and that my exchange with someone claiming to be guccifer 2.0 when viewed through the context, kept and timing was benign and innocuous. >> roger stone is just one of the major former trump campaign associates under the prussia probe and this week he testified before the house intelligence committee in a closed hearing and denied any direct contact with wikileaks or with russian operati

take a listen to roger stone who didn't go as publicly as this. >> i think julian assange a hero. i have not spoken with him. i have not met with mr. assange and i never said i had. we communicated through an intermediary. >> there was no intermediary. this was refusing to deny this direct discussion. >> absolutely. and there are some real important threads that need to be pulled. i take a little more restrained view. i don't think we've crossed over that path from campaign activity that's lawful to awful to conduct that's clearly criminal. but what investigators will want to do is take a look at the time line. we know that cambridge analytical was hired in 2016. we know that this occurred at some point in that same month. then we have the trump comment in july. so the devil will be in the details. it will be the sequence in which these events occurred. and most importantly, whether or not nicks was communicating with someone in the campaign. the e-mails are not reported to be from anyone in the campaign staff but there will be more that prosecutors will have access to and this co

interestingly enough according to one of the president's advisers roger stone cia director mike pump aoe has asked for further delay in releasing these documents a twenty thirteen gallup poll shows that only thirty percent of americans believe that oswald acted alone the other seventy percent point to other theories ranging from the cia the mafia to fidel castro and that's why judge ciarán hinds thought releasing the records was so vital to the american public and everyone abroad any time there is still records that are here is needed particularly when so. interesting to people and so concerning to be. so long after the fact you're going to leave a little question that there is something important that speak from the people. and so the question remains if these documents are released well it puts a bit in the theory as against oswald acted alone well only the public can decide ashley moser t. america's natasha sweeney los angeles thank you so much natasha and for more on the j.f.k. documents getting released from the white house we turn to andrew krag an investigative reporter organi

roger stone says he plans on being sued. like a utility. no one has been willing to file the antitrust case. i am. people reacting to this story on twitter of all of places. one say liberal bias is rampant everywhere. why can't there be a twitter alternative for conservatives and kevin on twitter says libs always get a pass because like twitter the mainstream media are all leftist owned and run. so twitter does have a policy against harassment. so, is this infringing on free speech rights or violate the rules. that's the question. jillian: what's the rock up to this these days, carley. >> we talk about the 2020 election it looks like he might be interested in running. these rumors started back in may when he said this. take a listen. >> starting tonight, i am running for the president of the united states. in the past, i never would have considered running for president. i mean, i didn't think i was qualified at all. but now i'm actually worried that i'm too qualified. [laughter] jillian: okay. well, over the weekend at l.a.

roger stone working with the russians saying that john podesta is about to spend his time in the barrel. you also have now just yesterday julian assange admitted that the trump campaign contacted him because they wanted hillary's hacked e-mails and, of course, peter smith, who was reaching out to the russians saying he was working on behalf of michael flynn to try to get e-mails. overwhelming evidence so far about intent to work with the russians. still a lot of work to do. >> because it was cambridge analytica that reached out to the wikileaks founder julian asaung a assange to try to get those hillary clinton e-mails that she had on a private server while she was secretary of state. >> and we haven't heard from them yet. so you're saying there is hard evidence of collusion right now between the trump campaign and the russians? you heard all of those republicans on your committee saying there's no evidence at all of any collusion. >> evidence has to be tested and developed and compared to other witness accounts. but right now, there is evidence that the trump campaign, the family and t

and roger stone could be an intermediary between julian assange and the trump campaign. we don't know. but i think it is kind of like when lester holt interviewed trump and trump said, well, yeah, russia was on my mind. i was thinking it was a fake probe. and "snl" did the he schtick on him and said we got him. he just admitted it. some of it is right on the table. >> speak to the growing list of people affiliated with the campaign who seem open or eager for foreign help which as we've documented is a crime. >> i have to say, i love this. in addition to being a former federal prosecutor, i'm a law professor. and this is like everything, national security law. first amendment law and criminal law. so the first amendment law is, it is not a crime for wikileaks to republish stolen information. as long as they didn't actually steal it. it is not a crime as you say, to collude to just work with the russians, but you can't solicit a contribution including opposition research. and so then the question is, is that what people in the trump campaign have done? have they actively t

together and clearly -- trish: at a moment in time. >> clearly he doesn't have a steve bannon, roger stone brilliant guys, some say off the wall, but they're brilliant guys, in his corner. >> sorry for teasing you. >>> house oversight committee is looking into possible criminal misconduct in the 2010 russian uranium deal. you know the deal was struck back when hillary clinton was secretary of state and president obama was in office. i don't understand how this deal was ever struck, really, truly, especially at the time the fbi was investigating vladmir putin for concerns he was trying to have undo influence in the atomic energy industry here in the u.s. how did they ever allow russia to buy uranium one? florida congressman ron desantis is here. "volatile markets." something we all think about as we head into retirement. it's why brighthouse financial is committed to help protect what you've earned and ensure it lasts. introducing shield annuities, a line of products that allow you to take advantage of growth opportunities. while maintaining a level of protection in down markets. so you can

there's a part of his base, people like roger stone, for example, a friend of the president who talks to him from time to time, was delighted that the president was going to take this action. remember, it was during the campaign the president speculated at the time -- then candidate-trump speculated 245 ted cruz's father was somehow involved in the assassination here. earlier today, i asked on the conference call and the files being released so far, is there any evidence of a conspiracy of a assassination behind john f. kennedy, is there any evidence that ted cruz's father was involved in that conspiracy? their answer was they couldn't answer, they were not going to comment on the files being released. so the mystery in some of this continues, but when it comes to ted cruz's father, that was an unfounded claim that came from then candidate donald trump, and the white house, i suppose, is thinking that over the next six month that is some of these questions will be answered by these various national security agencies that have a say in this. but this is becoming a promise made by the p

. >> your committee is now also warning roger stone, a former adviser, a friend of the president, that he may face a subpoena on friday if he doesn't reveal the name of the intermediary with the wikileaks founder julian assange. do you think he'll cooperate? >> i don't know, wolf. but as was reported and we try to keep the substance of these interviews and of the investigation quiet. but as was reported, roger stone did tell the committee that he communicated with wikileaks through somebody and both sides, actually the democrats and republicans in the room, made the point that we really need to know who that is. of course, that would be an answer -- one answer to the question of whether there was russian involvement in that particular conversation. whether or not he chooses to provide that involuntarily and what he said is if he could get permission from that individual. i don't know how it's going to come out yet. >> we'll be watching closely. congressman jim himes from connecticut, thank you. >> thank you, wolf. >>> one of trump's oldest friends and closest confidants talks about the

in direct contact with the russian gru posing as guccifer 2, as well as roger stone in contact directly or indirectly with assange and wikileaks. you also had the opposition researcher peter smith who was in contact apparently with people in the trump campaign. as well as those on the dark web who were believed to be russians in possession of these stolen e-mails. and now this, the data arm affiliated with the campaign also reaching out to julian assange, someone that our current cia director has basically said is in league with russian intel. so that's the context of this. and with all of those connections going back and forth between the campaign and wikileaks and guccifer, obviously areas of intense investigation by our committee. >> as you point out, congressman, julian assange personally confirmed the report. he says he rejected the offer, though, from cambridge analytica. what does that tell you? >> well, you know, again, assange is not someone you can trust, so, you know, it may or may not be significant. he confirms the contact. we may or may not be able to believe what

sometnt's men so insa what we should be focusing f the clinton administra >> reporter: trump adviser roger stone tweeted obscenities at cnn when they br. twit>> tor the democrats losing the nd it turns out to be once again is callinting, "all of this rtalk right when the republicans are making the big push for historic tax cuts an is this coinal? "the dems are using this try) witch hunt for evil politi but the white house lawyer handling the russia probe president's comments today are unrelated to the activities the special counseontinues to cooperate."king member of would not comment on whether thecon. >> i can't comment on that, george. that one way or the other. whether investigating ent?an't>> david wright joins us live from the white house. any re could be i >> reporter: the two key targets , paulafort an abc newsed manafort's team says they don't indictment is coming their way. t responded. >> david, thank you. >>> next to a disturbing story ng involving msix. u.s. officials military is looking into allegations two navy s.e.a.l.s may have killed green beret gloria ron theht, two s from the

as for roger stone, he's taking his twitter suspension as a badge of honor. texting our own katherine faulders overnight saying, sometimes the stark truth offends some people. and stone vowed terminator style, i'll be back. dan and cecilia? >> i'm sure he will. >> he will. >> david, thank you. we want to bring in our chief anchor, george stephanopoulos. he'll be hosting "this week." good morning. >> good morning. >> give us perspective. we don't have much information. about who is going to be charged. how significant a development do these charges have the potential to be? >> it depends on who it is. i think you're right. we don't really know all that much right now. we know mueller's been at work for five months. reaching an indictment in that time is relatively quick. the fact that we don't know who it is -- when we find out who it is, that will reveal a lot more about mueller's strategy. is it someone close to the white house? lower level? perhaps mueller and his team hope to flip and get information on those higher up the chain? we just don't know the answ

roger stone was attacking so many members of cnn in such a threatening fashion he was actually kicked permanently. it does seem -- you heard preet bharara say watch president trump, see what he does. >> going to be exciting coming from president trump's twitter world if it can get any more -- epic is the world. it will be epic tomorrow. >> although i'll say he hasn't really tweeted this weekend about the mueller investigation which is interesting. and his attorney, ty cobb, did an interview on "the new york time times" podcast and he was actually really good. he was the way trump should be, which is come on in, everybody should look at whatever there is. if he's saying that and he's got trump's ear, then maybe things calm down. but i think that the president has no ability to do that and i would say this about his supporters as well. i mean, the supporters should look at what ty cobb is saying rather than going off on all of this crazy stuff about, you know, hillary clinton and e-mails again and we're going to start now another investigation into her e-mails when you've got 70% of peo

there are subsequent references by roger stone.y the head of cambridge analytic ka in august about wanting to work with julian assange and wikileaks. wikileaks was an interrog tory for russia. and clearly there was a trifecta there at some point or another. >> to be continued, congresswoman jackie spears. thank you so much. always great to talk to you. >> great talking to you too. >>> you'd think she'd have a thing or two to say about today's indictments, but so far, silence from hillary clinton. one of her senior advisers in 2016 gives me his two cents next. i'm only in my 60's. i've got a nice long life ahead. big plans. so when i found out medicare doesn't pay all my medical expenses, i looked at my options. then i got a medicare supplement insurance plan. [ male announcer ] if you're eligible for medicare, you may know it only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. call now and find out about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all sta

i also should mention, rachel, roger stone, after we interviewed him in a public press conference told public that he had refused to answer the key question about his involvement in the russian hacking, which is who he was talking to with wikileaks, and whether it was julian assange or not. he said he wasn't there under subpoena. he was there voluntarily so, he didn't have to answer that. we're letting witnesses set their own terms, and we haven't shown a willingness to subpoena roger stone and ask us to give us that information. we're going in the wrong direction. and we are at risk of having a flat earth report come out of the house intelligence committee as to what happened with russia. >> a flat earth report. those are striking terms. i know that you attended a house intelligence meeting this evening. can i ask about how things are on the committee if you're trying to sound the alarm here that the ultimate report from this investigation on your committee is something that we out to worry about in terms of its integrity? >> well, we are all inspired by ranking member adam schiff who

long-time adviser to president trump roger stone says he plans to sue twitter for suspending his account. the company's move follows stone's profanity-laced tweets on friday about cnn anchor don lemon and "new york times" columnist charles blow, both of whom have been critical of the president. twitter did not comment on stone's account, but has policies against abuse and harassment. stone tells "politico:" "the battle against free speech has just begun." read new findings from a study of "year-in-space" astronaut scott kelly and twin brother mark on our website, www.pbs.org/newshour. >>> tomorrow the justice department faces a court deadline to explain why an american citizen health 50 u.s. military in iraq can't see a lawyer. the american civil liberties union has challenged the decision, the pentagon won't release his name but said he was fighting for i.s.i.s. and surrendered six weeks ago to a syrian rebel group that turned him over to the u.s. ruled americans and others captured, may have an opportunities to contest the charges again them. that's it for the pbs captioning sponsored

interesting you say roger stone.assive plots with hundreds of people to kill kennedy. we don't agree on the case except the date kennedy was killed but we joined together a couple of weeks ago in a joint statement asking the president to release these files. i'm very proud to have been part of that effort with roger stone to appeal to president trump to release them and i don't think that national security is at stake. what they're saying is the law that was passed 25 years ago gives the president the right to if there is an identifiable harm to law enforcement or foreign relations to say the harm is so great that file should be kept. what they've been pushing recently from the c.i.a. the disclosure of these documents from mexico city back in 1963 where there are names inside the files of mexican citizens who went on to become prominent politicians and business people that were informants for the cia. it could be embarrassing for the mexican government. >> sandra: those documents set to be released today. i'm sure th

there's a part of his base, people like roger stone, for example, a friend of the president who talksm from time to time, was delighted that the president was going to take this action. remember, it was during the campaign the president speculated at the time -- then candidate-trump speculated that ted cruz's father was somehow involved in the kennedy assassination. earlier this evening here at the white house, administration officials held a conference call with reporters. i asked, on the conference call, in the files that are being released so far, is there any evidence of a conspiracy behind the assassination of john f. kennedy -- is there any evidence that ted cruz's father was involved in the assassination of john f. kennedy? and the answer we got was they couldn't answer our question. they were not going to comment on the content of the files being released. so the mystery -- and some of this continues, but when it comes to ted cruz's father, that was an unfounded claim that came from then candidate donald trump. and the white house, i suppose, is thinking that over the next six

been indicted so we're talking about a very high level people here not to mention the fact that roger stone very longstanding campaign associate of the president seemed to know beforehand that wiki leaks was going to be releasing negative information on hillary as he did this summer so i think we haven't seen that the end of this course trump campaign is keep putting out noises that the kids that this investigation is almost over but that's just wishful thinking on them as you say maybe it is just the tip of the iceberg former congresswoman elizabeth holtzman joining me tonight from new york it's all the thank you very much we appreciate you being on the day thank you and we want to look now at the ukrainian leaks of this and man affords dealings there i'm joined now by my colleague nick connelly he is in kiev tonight good evening to you nick so man afford stands accused of being an unregistered foreign agent for ukraine he's even admitted it what exactly did he do or is he alleged to have done. good evening brant well it seems clear that paul manifolds spent a lot of time in ukraine starti

the only question is whether or not, as kelly referred to, somebody like the cia, mike pompeo who roger stone, an ally of the president outside the government, said that pompeo has been lobbying against the release of these to protect the cia. don't know where that goes. i think it is significant that the president included that caveat about receipt of further information in his tweet. >> let's just say before we move on i'm looking at the results of a 2013 a.p.jfk poll. about a fourth think lee harvey oswald acted alone. >>> let's go right to this, pam. among the president's tweets this morning, he ramped up his attacks against congresswoman frederica wilson. this is the family of la david johnson was getting ready to lay him to rest, which is actually under way right now. where do we go from here? is it now up to general kelly to apologize as the washington post editorial board is calling upon him to do, or what do you see happening? >> i think that this episode is really a reflection of what we've seen time and again from this administration, when is an inability to apologize. what happens

. >> reporter: trump adviser roger stone tweeted obscenities at cnn when they broke the news. twitter promptly suspended him. >> the whole russia thing was an excuse for the democrats losing the election and it turns out to be just one excuse. >> reporter: now the president once again is calling this a sideshow. tweeting, "all of this russia talk right when the republicans are making their big push for historic tax cuts and reform. is this coincidental? not!" "the dems are using this terrible (and bad for our country) witch hunt for evil politics." but the white house lawyer handling the russia probe quickly clarified, "the president's comments today are unrelated to the activities of the special counsel, with whom he continues to cooperate." today, the ranking member of the house intelligence committee would not comment on whether the president could be a target of the investigation. >> i can't comment on that, george. i can't answer that one way or the other. >> you wouldn't know whether robert mueller is investigating the president? >> i can't comment on that at all. >> dav

seen a deep willingness and eagerness on the trump campaign to work with the russians, whether roger stonever there, the email saying we can work with putin and engineer this for our boys. we will have to see if that materializes to a partnership. emily: you have talked about the lack of interest of some gop colleagues in this investigation. deal have any concerns about the public in general losing interest in this investigation or the investigation itself losing steam. the public knows and values our freedom to choose. this is what this is about, who gets to choose of the ballot box, us or one of our enemies. every american republican or democrat takes that seriously. emily: representative eric swalwell, thank you for joining us. great to have you on the show. finally in today's revolving door, mike hawkins is leaving to take the chair of sony pictures television. freer has been announced as his replacement as more consumers ditch cable for web-based alternatives. that does it for this edition of "bloomberg technology." we are live streaming on twitter. check us out at @bloombergtechtv. t

nobody brings it up. >> citing is own white house sources, roger stone told cbs news that cia directorblock the release of the files. cia spokesperson said the agency continues to engage in the process to determine the appropriate next steps with respect to any preachously unreleased cia information. >> there is going to be conspiracy theories no matder what. everybody should remember. that's what they are. theories not fact. >> the fbi its not commenting and is deferring to the white house. the white house told us the president wants to release the documents in the interest of transpair ensy but will not release some of the documents, if the agencies provide a clear and compeltion national security or law enforcement justification. that of course gives the agencies a huge amount of wiggle room. >>> new study shows the average american throws away 185 pounds of plastic each year. waumter bottles or garbage bags. a lot of the junk ends up in the oceans. tracking the trash to the top of the world. the arctic circle in norway. >> reporter: time is running out for an unusual patrol. soon,

. >> roger stone wants answers. i would like to know what the answers are. i think it best book written about the assassination is by james elroy. it talks about the coalesce sense of different groups of people. the cia, the mob, and possibly an fbi cover-up paul working not necessarily together, but all with the same goal to wants to see kennedy assassinated. i'm curious to see what will happen. i just think trump's intentions are notal truistic. true -- are not altruistic. it's for his own benefit. charles * lee harvey some walled as the lone gunman, who trained him, who inspired him. it's too complicated for one angry american citizen who embraced maxism to pull off. >> it's shared by such a huge segment of the public. people were thinking we are going to have closure on that. it's a little too optimistic. but this one of those conspiracy theories that a large swawft public has an interests in and believes. we have so many institutions at play here. people were earring for answers. i don't know that they were ever going to get them from this particular do

we see right there from paul manafort to michael flynn, don jr., jared kushner, carter page, and roger stoneho was banned from twitter yesterday because of an over the weekend twitter rant that he had. do you think that when it comes to the big reveal, that it may not be just one person, but there could be a larger reveal tomorrow of certain members of this team? >> look welcome fr, from what w sounds like one indictment and we can't be sure. bob mule e mueller is a real professional. they're looking for whatever the appropriate charges are. they don't have an end goal in mind. it's not about proving or disproving collusion. it's about bringing the right charge on the right people. >> are any of you surprised about the time limit? >> yeah, that is, you know, a blink of an eye when you talk about really complexion commission investigations. and that bob mueller and his folks kind of inhearted that investigation. so the harge that's will be revealed tomorrow, assuming the leaks are accurate, may relate more to something that was under investigation at the time when he was fired. >> despite dis

and roger stone wrote a book alleging vice president lyndon johnson had to do, said on info wars, making files public. >> what else do we learn from these documents? the findings are going to be telling. >> unlikely we will get major revelations, scholars and experience he is conspiracy theorist will look for details about lee harvey oswald, the man charged in coming jfk and whether he acted alone. the dallas morning news reports the jfk files contain cia personality, letters from the fbi director j edgar hoover and first lady jackie kennedy, transcripts of kgb agents argued oswald had not been recruited by the soviets and insight into his trip to mexico city just 7 weeks before the assassination. donald trump in may 2016, candidate trump linked to the father of texas senator ted cruz to jfk's assassination citing is unsubstantiated report that his father raphael was photograph next to oswald. america's top conspiracy no doubt. kelly: a group photo, all five living former presidents will be posing for pictures later tonight to headline a hurricane relief benefit. the concert called deep

if you take all the circumstances we learned about in this investigation so far, coupled with roger stone podesta is next in the barrel, take all this information that we know so far, you begin to question just how much influence the russians had. clearly there was some involvement. in my mind, there is evidence that there was coordination. will we ever know exactly how much it influenced the american public? probably not. we must find out what they did and how to prevent it in the future. cory: coordination. are you pursuing an investigation that there may have been coordination between the trump campaign and these russian ads appearing on facebook and beyond? representative quigley: let me direct you to what we know publicly. trump, jr., saying publicly, acknowledging, "if that's what it is, i love it." that's at the very least an acknowledgment, an interest, a willingness to coordinate or collude. i'm not sure collude is the legal term. that's just the public information at this point in time. there's a lot of dots we have to connect, and there are a growing number of dots. when they a

include this with roger stone, adviser to trump in the campaign telling hill he had intermediary connecting him to assange and in touch of russian officer online and 0 cording to "wall street journal" there was effort with people on the trump campaign searching for russians who may have had clinton's missing e-mails. all may be taken into account but no accusations of wrong doing. >> thank you. to you senator, what if any is the significance of cambridge analytica reaching out to wikileaks? >> it is significance because demonstrates evidence of potential collusion 20 trump campaign and russian interference, there's no question according to intelligence community there was russian interference. the president has called the special counsel's investigation and investigation of the judicial committee and trump collusion a hoax but here we have more evidence of a pattern established of collusion and perhaps of obstruction of justice. >> statement put out by the trump campaign saying, basically distancing themselves from cambridge analytica, saying suggestion that it was anything but rnc data tha

we know from roger stone, the hackers who were hacking the dnc and john podesta, we know from the meetings from donald trump, jr., had, and we know what they wanted to do but we need to wait for john mueller to tell us what they found out. >> we know what is happening because we have communication and e-mails that were not deleted or destroyed to deceive the american people. that we do know. >> paris, just to be clear, you are completely comfortable with somebody hired and paid $6 million by the trump campaign reaching out to julian assange, again, no friend of the united states, asking for help in doing something illegal? >> i did not say i am completely comfortable with it. what i am saying is an e-mail was sent, an e-mail was at the request -- i have not seen it and i don't know who has seen the full e-mail, but from what i have been told and read, i was told the e-mail was sent and the request was rejected. in my mind nothing happened. if something had happened -- >> they asked for it to happen. >> would you have ever written an e-mail, paris, in the political work you have done, would

you know, it is -- we have people saying in this including roger stone, who actually gets the last wordthat the rules of american politics changed that weekend. and what we don't know is it only for donald trump or will this be forever in elections? but i hope people can watch it. it's 64 hours, the weekend that blew up the rules of american politics. >> i can't wait to watch it. it has been reported now that his wife is leaving him. harvey weinstein's wife is now leaving him. what happens next? >> i think what we're seeing is wherever people are most vulnerable to an imbalance of power whereby the catholic church, hollywood, media with roger ales and politics, we're seeing that men who have abused that power are being called to account. this is great development socially. it's a great development politically, but we do have to see in the wake of the "access hollywood" tape and all that we're talking about tonight, whether everyone's going to be held accountable. because there are some in the precincts of power who are yet having their secrets kept by everyone around them. >> fascinatin

. >> roger stone has been kicked off twitter for threatening journalists. he attacked don lemon calling him dumbing than dog droppings, but he did not use droppings. then, finally, on a much lighter note, where do you put the lettuce, where do you put the cheese in a cheeseburger? this is quite a discussion after someone noticed the the emoji puts the lettuce ton bottom. no, on the top and the cheese on the bottom. you can't put the cheese on the bottom. the ceo tweeted this morning, this would be their top priority when they come back to work to fix it. >> he leaves it open. if folks can agree on the correct way. i guess there isn't a correct way. you put the cheese on top of the meat. >> you are grilling it that way. >> then the tomato an lettuce, right? >> there is only one way. >> i can fix that. i don't like cheese on mine. take it off. >> have it your way. yeah. >> anyway you want. >>> halloween comes early for the golden state warriors and a star. take a look here. it's scary. look closely. look. i'm pretty sure this is steph curry yesterday. the tea

you also have roger stone was an advisor to the president with potential charges, too.he likely candidate is paul manafort and the reason why is because he would note the most and his house has already been rated in july by federal agents. based upon that raid there weren't criminal information that they acted on and potentially that might be diamond we see tomorrow. arthel: so if it is manafort doesn't stop there with him or will we wait -- [laughter] if it is manafort, if it's his indictment, will it be self-contained in that it is just him or will he sing like a bird and bring down other people? >> that is one of the things the feds will are known to do. they will come down on one person and use that person to cooperate against all the other defendants so they will say look, if you tell us x, y and z but in this case i think manafort is a big fish and i think they will use them to scare the little fish in the little fish will sing like the birds and they will tell you everything you need to know about this big fish and that is the strategy that muller is using. arthe