ron --host: ron, independent line. caller: it's nice to talk to you, i like the way you talk. i'm looking at the bible for the republican party, 2025, heritage , that's the basis it seems for them moving forward, to change and have a complete reconstruction of the country in terms of the constitution. number two, what do you think -- where do you think women will make an impact in voting this year? i think it's time we get a female in their who has the ability, like harris, and i'm not necessarily leaning towards her, i'm just looking at her platform, but at this point in time i think it's time that we begin to get the male out of the political system and let women begin to use some of their knowledge to run this country. the last thing is -- do polls really justify voting in the direction of a lot of people, including democrats and republicans? if you could address those three things, i would appreciate it. thank you. guest: to go in order, you mentioned project 2025, a pretty conservative blueprint the heritage foundation put together. obviously, the trump campaign sees it as a liability. they have tried to distance themselves from specific proposals. frankly, taking vance as a running mate, he is kind of close to the world of heritage and all of that. so, if they want to distance themselves from that, vance may not have been a great choice in terms of doing that. but that document really plays very much into the whole democratic campaign against the republican ticket. as for women voters, generally speaking, the electorate in any given state has slightly more women than men. there are actuarial table reasons as to why that's the case. there are a few exceptions like maybe north dakota or alaska, where you have got like a lot of younger men going into those states to work in resource extraction kinds of jobs, but generally there will be slightly more women than men in those states, slightly bigger gender gap that would exist even if the republican nominee was a woman and the democratic nominee was a man or the reverse, you can see this in other races. women are generally more left-leaning on the issues. again, certainly not all women, but on average men are more conservative and more republican leaning. there has been this gender gap in american politics that has been present for several decades now and i don't think it is going anywhere. as for the polling question, you know, i think it's kind of -- we get asked this about polls all the time. i think it's kind of amazing that polls do as well as they do in terms of measuring voter sentiment because it is such a difficult task to get a representative sample, particularly if you are calling people on the phone, you have to make tens of thousands of calls to get the kind of sample that you want. and again don't expect polls to be perfect, it's not a fair standard but they generally give us a good sense of what's going on. polls were important in this monumental change of an election with joe biden leaving the race and kamala harris coming in, because without polls showing the dire position of the president, it would have been much harder for democrats to make that argument for him to leave. i got in, right call or wrong call, the polls were very much a part of it. host: to that point, leon in new jersey is asking about your track record in predictions. guest: myself, i've been at this since 2012. we did really well in 2012 and 2000 20. not so hot in 2016. not uncommon for people in my position. down ballot we have done good, though the house has been a real challenge. the republicans did better than expected in 2000 20. democrats did better than expected in 2022. you know, we have our hits and misses like anyone else. host: all right, that is jeffrey bloodworth at -- that is kyle kondik from the university of virginia center for politics and the author of the book "the long red thread." thank you for joining us. guest: thank you. host: more of your calls after the break open for form. numbers are republican, (202) 748-8001, democrat, (202) 748-8000, and independents, (202) 748-8002. later in the program we will be talking about the role of rural and rustbelt voters this campaign cycle with professor jeffrey bloodworth. >> saturday, american history tv feature notable convention speeches. watch notable remarks from nominees and other speakers over the past decades. barack obama gives a keynote speech supporting john kerry for president at the 2004 democratic convention. >> this year, this election, we are going to reaffirm our values and commitments, see how we are measuring up to the legacy of our forebears. fellow americans, democrats, republicans, independents, tonight we have more work to do. >> mitt romney speaks to the 2008 delegates after the strong showing of john mccain. >> we strengthen our people and the economy when we preserve and promote opportunity. opportunity is what let's hope become reality. opportunity expands when there is excellence in choice in education. when taxes are lower. when every citizen has affordable health insurance and when constitutional feds are preserved. >> watch historic speeches saturdays on c-span two. watch the live campaign 2024 coverage of the democratic national convention aust 19 through the 22nd. you can watch the republican national convention any time on the website. >> if you ever miss any of c-span's coverage, you can find at any time at c-span.org. videos of key hearings, debates, and other events featuring markers guiding you towards interesting and newsworthy highlights that appear on the right-hand side of your screen when you hit play on select videos. this makes it easy to quickly get an idea of what was debated and decided in washington. school -- scroll through four points of interest. >> "washington journal" continues. host: welcome back. we are in open forum and will go straight to the calls. new york is first, on the line for democrats. ray, good morning. lost ray. andrea, texas, independent. caller: hello, texas. thank you, thank you for taking my call. i wanted to address the individual about religion, talking about abortion and things like that. i wanted to remind him that even god gives us all freedom of choice. i think it's ironic that these men think that it's ok to tell women how and what to do with our bodies. then i also wanted to say that it's really frustrating to hear a lot of these callers that is not educated. i think it's just like when you come in to be a citizen, we should have some sort of litmus test for individuals who want to vote. that way people would know who the person or who is involved with i guess how much power the president can have as opposed to people who run for these offices so that they don't be blaming individuals who don't have no power over things that they want to blame for. all right. brenda is in manito act, wisconsin. republican. caller: yes, i just want to -- i hope you can inform the public that project 2025 is a think tank paper. it's not the republican platform, it's not trumps platform. when you encourage people to look it up and read it, you are giving the impression that this is a republican written paper by the republican written paper by the republican party at this time. and that it is trump's paper, which it is not. i would encourage that when people call in, if you say please read project 2020 five, this is a democratic talking point. thank you. host: homer, shreveport, louisiana, democrat. caller: i'm a vietnam era veteran and i wanted to say that i think it's about time for the women to really take the show from these old white men that have messed it up long enough. so, i think it is time for the ladies, to give them a shot. the country is in disarray. appreciate you. later. host: all right, we are in open forum for the next 20 minutes. republicans, (202) 748-8001. the democrats, (202) 748-8000. independents, (202) 748-8002. vincent, you are next. gaithersburg. caller: i was hoping we could go back, miss mimi, look up there was a lady who called. i'm a disabled veteran. she said that vice president jd vance did not serve. she said she got that information out of c-span, out of your archives and all of them. i look -- i don't look at your archives anymore -- caller: she said he didn't serve in combat, that he was a public affairs officer. he absolutely served in the military. caller: no, no, he served in combat. that's a small issue. it's not a small issue. host: i understand the difference in semantics. he was deployed to a war zone, but i think her point was that he wasn't in an active shooting situation. but he absolutely deployed to a war zone. caller: may i'll say -- you all do this -- host: go ahead, i just wanted to clarify. caller: no, you did not clarify, you confused. still on the democratic pup talking point that this man did not serve. you still got your wrong point across. i've been watching c-span for a very long time. host: ok, go ahead and make the point you want to make. caller: and you are doing the same thing, trying to derail, trying to not let me -- host: paul, democratic line. caller: when president trump was running on his first term, there was a thing that we called unemployability at the v.a. and at that time they were going to cancel that, which a lot of veterans are disabled and cannot work, not 100%. it allows them to draw a retirement pension. however, most of them are seniors. what happened was the votes came in they were not able to do it. can you talk more about social security and the v.a. benefits in terms of retirement? thank you. host: anne, waynesboro, pennsylvania, republican. good morning. caller: i have one question. been watching. lately i haven't been much into the politics but in the last three years i have not seen or heard of camille a harris doing anything. what has she done since she has been vice president? host: ok. kate, michigan, independent. good morning. caller: i just would like to talk about a story i saw yesterday about project 2025 on "democracy now!" it was interesting. their work training videos that went along with us. one thing people need to realize when they say that trump is not associated with this is that the people who put it together are all from his administration. the people in the videos are from his administration. if you want to be frightened, go ahead and listen to these training videos, which i guess are available for us all to listen to now. that is one thing i wanted to point out. the other thing is i wish that c-span would do a program about the murder or killing of lincoln riley. because it is always brought up on this. i would like to know the story behind that. i would like to know what happened to the fellow that killed her. i think it was a man. get the back story of the outcome of that. that's all i have to say for now. thank you. host: sandy, democratic line, massachusetts. good morning. caller: yes, i'm 81 years old and i believe that we need to listen to each other and are different thinking about the election and the candidates. i listen to as many television stations and newspapers as i can . i tried to get both sides. we are not doing that. the other thing, i would like to know if anyone can help me, where we can get training in listening to the other side and really trying to be objective as possible, if we want to vote for the right candidate that we feel will be the best person to govern the united states. thank you. host: this is "the washington post," this headline, since june "agents have been targeting attacks coming against both presidential campaigns." caller: hi. thank you for taking my call. i wonder if any of these people thought of the issues we face as a country. inflation. people cannot make enough money to buy food, gas, everything is so high. we are heavily in debt. millions of illegal immigrants are getting more money than i make on social security. i believe in legal immigration, but not illegal. and i don't know how they can let illegals vote. they are illegal people, and i thank you for your time. host: alan in little rock, arkansas. independent. good morning. caller: good morning. well, it is great to be on again . it once a month kind of a thing. just remembering, as i was on hold, my first call was back in the 1980's, and my first political thought that i think i can date back to was, as a kid, thinking, why are they calling him president kennedy? i thought you only would say president in association to eisenhower. i'm just a kid. host: that was a long time ago, alan. caller: i thought president what with the name -- went with the name. so, high school debate team, college debate team, which led me to know that i have never won an argument in my life. so, i'm calling to wish a happy birthday, and would appreciate so much if you would help look up her online, youtube page. you have done that before for me. three other calls in the last six months. but her name is anna, from ukraine. and today is her birthday. so, happy birthday, anna from ukraine. and i'm calling to reach president trump. i am a conservative, independent, and i have supported him for four years on twitter as just trying to support him in every way possible. so, i am wanting to reach president trump and ask him, truly, to support ukraine and listen to anna from ukraine. she is the most articulate spokesperson for, really, independence and freedom in the world, and i almost think they will qualify being our 51st state, because they are so much like we were as we started as a country. a retired history teacher, and ukraine is so much like america when we started. so, i'm asking to invite anna on for a 30 minute segment, and -- host: alan, we will take that recommendation and hear from gregory in belleville, new jersey. caller: yes, good morning. how are you doing? anyway, i wanted to speak on, there is so much brainwashing. i'm getting tired of all of the stupidity in this country. host: about what, gregory? 1 yes -- caller: yes, i'm tired of the brainwashing and there are so many ignorant people. first of all, i want to speak on inflation. inflation is, note president of the united states can stop inflation. inflation, business can put a price on anything. there is too many legalized crooks in this country. and big business runs this country. they are all stealing. it is part of the makeup of america. how do you rob the country, period? and nothing is going to change unless they are going to admit to themselves who they are, and they are not prepared for that. the propaganda in this country through the news media, running a game on them. trump creates a lot of hatred in this country, period. he is playing on that. and his people try to hide it, which is mostly made up of white folks. taking us backwards to where, this game of america being great , there is no such thing. america has always been a conquering country. they are about greed. they are not going to change. they don't want to change. they want to keep control over the masses of people by spreading the propaganda they have in this country. it is so messed up, thinking about things that you have no control over. host: right, gregory. this is on fox eight live that says, president biden is visiting new orleans on tuesday for cancer moonshot event. it says that president biden is expected to announce a federal grant to help in the fight against cancer when he and first lady jill biden visit new orleans on tuesday. that is part of biden's cancer moonshot initiative. we will have coverage of that event live today here on c-span. it starts at 4:30 p.m. on the network. also on our app and online. and joey is calling us from atlanta, republican. hi, joey. caller: good morning. i really want for all of your viewers and listeners to understand how important it is to be properly informed. there is so much misinformation, so many lies and confusion, and it is amazing how this country is just falling apart. our country is at a turning point. i really want people to understand how important it is to vote for people who have christian morals, christian values. this is what this country was built on, and we are so far away from those roots that it is literally destroying us. we are going to destroy each other because our morals are no longer christian morals. we have to get back to the roots of what this country was built on. so many women and men have lost their lives protecting those rights, and we are literally destroying this country with the hate among each other. we are throwing stones at each other. there is one very important person once said, which one among us is sinless? let that person through the first stone. instead of trying to hate each other, let's build on each other. let's create love and unite us. let's get back to our christian values, because this country was built on christian values, and the longer we keep -- the more we keep fighting each other, we will destroy this country. america is going down the tubes because we are no longer a christian nation. thank you. host: cheryl, nevada, california, independent line. caller: yes, i just wanted to say, and to the man who just said ukraine should be the 51st state of the united states, you might want to consider that in a way it might be because we are subsidizing the whole ukrainian economy and not just of your efforts. the civil service and other aspects of the ukrainian economy. we are doing that. that is not what i really called to talk about. what i wanted to say was that i think that people, no matter what caller they are -- color they are, that we should not allow ourselves to be caught up in hatred or personalities, looking at people in politics just based on their color, or whether they are male or female, but pay attention to the policies and really tone down the rhetoric that has to do with hatred and camino, insulting people. no matter which side, you know, because it is not good. the only thing to come from that is terrible things. i think at this time so many people in this country have been suffering over the last four years because of the economy, with the effects of the pandemic. many people have become poor and needy, and many people who were formerly middle-class are not, and citizens, people who are citizens of this country, their quality of life is going down. and for many people they are suffering. i live in california and i know about that. i think the future of society and its strengths and longevity, much of it has to do with how they treat the poor and needy. so, we should care for them. host: right, cheryl. this is bric in sebring, florida. democrat. caller: good morning, c-span. thanks for letting me speak. host: go right ahead, rick. caller: i want to talk about guns. especially military weapons. i think there should be public armories for citizens to put their military weapons in a public armory, and put a tracking device on them. and have a receiver or something that beeps every time somebody in the neighborhood, or your school or church, has a device that will pick up the track and keep track of these military weapons. i can't believe they are not even talking about guns after that hernandez assassination attempt on the former president. you know, we don't get rid of these guns, there is going to be the next time there is an insurrection everybody's going to be ready to shoot. i think that is just horrendous, that nobody is even talking about don's. it is like it disappeared. i don't know where this country is going to come up but i can assure you that the next time there is a result it is not going to be without military weapons. and civilians should not have them. host: patty in mississippi, republican. caller: hi. i originally left mississippi. i am now in georgia, me and my husband, because mississippi has been neglected. we have been underfunded and it is very difficult. me and my husband, we packed up our two dogs. now we are in georgia. host: it is in north carolina, independent line. caller: yes, ma'am. good morning. as an independent i just want to hear more policy from kamala harris. i know she is the number two in the biden administration and supported all of his policies. but i would love to hear from her on what her policies are. and also the changes that she has made. i heard a little about some of the things she is up for. i'm just curious, why has she done a 180 now? is she still going to follow the biden policies? where is she going to make a different call? i have heard nothing from her so far, so i don't know if we're going to have another one of those elections like we had in 2020, where she is going to be a basement person instead of speaking. because she is handed the position. the position was given to her, and she was nonelected. but she was chosen. she was chosen for that position by biden and the democratic party. i would love to hear more. her poll numbers are looking great, but she has not spoke. that is what is getting me. i would love to hear her talk. i would love to hear her on what she thinks. like i said, what she has going against her now, she has the last 3.5 years under that administration, but if she is going to be her own person and be the boss i would really love to hear some of her speak. thank you for your time. host: governor tim walz will be addressing workers at the convention in los angeles today. we will also have live coverage of that. that starts at 5:00 p.m. today on c-span and on c-span now, our app, and on c-span.org, online. and here is freddie. good morning. caller: good morning, c-span. thank you for taking my call. first i would like to state that the man that is running for president, donald trump, i am not a vietnam veteran, but i am an army veteran that has a problem with anybody that criticizes people that serve in any capacity. donald trump don't care about anyone but himself, and his followers, i don't understand why you were not voting your interests. most are either unemployed, low income, not educated, and [indiscernible] i don't understand why someone would throw themselves on a knife or a man when god is supposed to be the one that is supposed to have the position of authority. he thinks that just by him being white he's got privilege. he's got a policy to do whatever he wants. [indiscernible] not when we enslaved people, slotted the indians. -- slaughtered the indians. host: republican. good morning. jerry, are you still there? go ahead. caller: [indiscernible] flying around with air force two. we are paying for the fuel. how come we have to pay for the fuel to have her take planes all of the country when she ain't resident yet? -- president yet? number two, god saved trump for a reason. so, he's got a good reason to run for president. thank you. host: we will talk to gannon university professor jeffrey bloodworth about the role of rural and rustbelt voters this campaign cycle. stay with us. >> next up for c-span's coverage of this summer's political party conventions, we had to chicago for the democratic national convention. watch live, beginning monday, august 19, as the party puts forward their presidential nominee. here leaders talk about the administration's track record and their vision for the next four years. as the fight to continue the white house. the democratic national convention, live, august 19, on c-span, c-span now, or online at c-span.org. don't miss a moment. visit our website for the latest schedule updates and for full coverage of the republican national convention. you can also catch up on past conventions anytime at c-span.org/campaign, or by scanning the code. >> friday night, watching c-span's 2024 campaign trail. a weekly round up of campaign coverage, providing a one-stop shop to -- to discover what candidates are saying to voters. along with first-hand accounts from political reporters, updated poll numbers, fundraising data, and campaign ads. at 7:30 p.m. eastern on c-span, online at c-span.org, or download as a podcast on c-span now, our free mobile app. c-span. your unfiltered view of politics. >> c-spanshop.org is c-span's store. browse through our collection of products, apparel, books, home to core, and accessories. there is something for every c-span fan. shop now, or any time c-spanshop.org. >> "washington journal post quote continues. host: welcome back. we are joined now by jeffrey bloodworth, a professor at gannon university. welcome to the program. guest: it is great to be here. thanks for having me. host: i want to start with the piece you wrote for unheard. it is called "the revolt of the rust belt. what do you mean by revolt? guest: the rust belt for decades was a democratic stronghold, and donald trump in -- since 2016 has made this a trumpist area. he switched those states on the back of rustbelt voters. and won the presidency. you know, this is the seedbed of the trumpist movement. it is not the only stronghold, but it is one of the pillars that gives trump his strength and ability to retake the white house. host: can you define what the rust belt is and a little bit of the history, the political history of that area? guest: yeah, the rust belt is amorphous, but it is an area stretching from the upper midwest, thinking wisconsin, michigan, stretching east, you know, to pennsylvania, parts of new york. you can think of it stretching as far south as st. louis, missouri, all the way east through ohio. it is the industrial heartland. we call it the rust belt because in the 1950's it was home to 50% of all american jobs, right? think about heavy industry. they called the rust belt due to the process of automation, globalizatn, the industrial heartland has lost its economic might. and it slowly became a shell of its former self. many of these jobs were union jobs and they gave working-class people a real toehold in the middle class. think about it geographically as the heartland. this region has been taking it on the chin. i mean, no region in america has suffered more in the transition from being an industrialized economy to a postindustrial economy than the rust belt. i would argue that donald trump is the culmination of this massive transition. you know, millions of working-class voters who use to always have a toehold in the middle class or hoped to have a toehold in the middle class, have been left behind. i live in the rust belt and i traveled to d.c. or new york or overseas, and the difference in terms of affluence is quite stark. you know, for people who don't travel to the rust belt very often, they should come visit sometime. go to youngstown. come to. . drive-thru western pennsylvania. i think you will see why donald trump has a certain appeal to certain kinds of voters. he mentioned -- host: you mentioned the economic issues. what has been happening in the rust belt? guest: look, as the fruits of american prosperity have flowed to the coasts and flow to people like me who do not live on the coast, highly educated people, also the cultural power has flowed to highly educated elites on the coast. and, you know, those of us who live in the interior. they have a certain kind of value and cultural norms that stand in contrast to mainstream, middle american values. so, the culture wars, as we call them, they are part and parcel of a feeling of being left behind. of not having a voice in the larger, kind of national conversation. i think it is the economic issues that are at the forefront, but the culture war is a sense of working-class folk who feel angry about being left behind economically, and that makes them more prone to be activated by these culture war issues. look, it is just a different sensibility of highly educated people in los angeles versus a working-class person in youngstown, ohio, or here he, pennsylvania. but we know who controlled the legacy media and hollywood. it is a feeling of being left out and left behind. host: the subtitle of the book is that democrats have squandered the white working class. what have they done specifically, and what do you think they need to do, if anything, to regain the white working class? guest: let's begin with, the white working class is still the nation's single largest voting demographic. the largest sector of the american electorate. i mean, it is shrinking. in the 1970's 70% of all voters were white working class. to date is around 40%. it used to be the heart and soul of the democratic party. and starting in the late 1960's the democrats lost the white working class. you know, to the republican party. again, the white working class is not just one thing. the northern white working class is different from the southern white working class. but it used to be the heart and soul of the democratic party. and, you know, now the white working class has shifted to being the heart and soul of the republican party. and for democrats to not only just win an election, how do we get out of this democratic deficit we are in where neither party can build an enduring governing majority and really establish some kind of stability? this is not about winning one election. this is about democrats building an enduring government majority, passing legislation that can ameliorate some of the economic and social issues of working-class americans. the only way to do that is to win a significant portion of not just white working class, but donald trump is making inroads into the nonwhite working-class. the only way for democrats to not just win one election, but build a governing majority, is to win working-class voters back into the democratic coalition. that is a combination of a tangible policies, but also significant cultural symbolism. i would say it begins with letting working-class people run for office again. working-class people, right? people with working-class roots that might not have a college education. working in congressional and senate offices and on presidential campaigns. there is a different cultural sensibility between those who are only raised in upper-middle-class mail you -- i am a working-class kid myself. i have a phd and run in certain circles now. i can tell you, there is a different sensibility. i see as a historian of liberalism, i think i have insight into why american liberals have struggled over my entire lifetime. they have lost that working-class instability that used to animate the party of fdr. host: if you would like to join the conversation you can do so. our lines are, republicans, (202) 748-8001. democrats, (202) 748-8000. and independents, (202) 748-8002 . you can start calling in now. jeff, switching over to rural voters, you wrote an opinion piece in the "washington post" in june, so this is before biden dropped out of the race. with the headline, rural voters do not trust biden. the progressive voters even care? explain what you mean by that. guest: i was writing a biography on carl albert. this is somebody who would win 75% of the rural vote in deep red oklahoma. the very same regions that a liberal house speaker would win 75% of the vote are the strongest trump regions today. when i have come to see as an academic, and i run in these circles, is that highly educated americans, who generally lean left, they look at rural america with this disdain, with this sense of, those stupid people vote for trump. there is a very real sensibility. i'm not making this up. that there is nothing you can say to these people. these people vote against their interests. again, this is not every democrat by any stretch, but i'm talking about academia. that filters down into elite opinion. that there is almost like something inevitably reactionary about rural america. which is bizarre to a historian, because we understand that liberalism was born in rural america. as recently as the 1990's bill clinton won about half of the rural vote. so the question is, do progressives even care. there is a certain part of the democratic party that is -- that has written off rural america as reactionary. there are candidates all across the country in 2024 pushing back against that. i want to make that clear. there is a lot of interesting democrats running in rural america that opinion. there sense of a rising insurgency pushing back against i -- against what i would think i had become conventional wisdom. that is the question. for vice president harris, whether she wins or not is the margins of defeat in rural america. who will win that contest? will progressives care and go out to rural and the rust belt and avidly campaign and asked for their votes? in 2016, eureka, pennsylvania, the third largest -- eerie, pennsylvania, you cannot get a yard sign for hillary clinton. that is how little the campaign cared about pennsylvania. no wonder she lost pennsylvania. this is an encapsulation of an elite attitude. in pennsylvania philadelphia and pittsburgh matter as far as elite democrats are concerned. that is the push and pull and there is a real movement against that within the democratic party. that sensibility most certainly is there and set the stage for donald trump in 2016. host: let's take calls and we will start with stephen in arizona. republican. caller: i have two questions. when the people from the rust belt see jd vance getting beat up by the media, do they believe it? it seems like academia, which sees the other vice president elect being treated like he is the second coming erica, and then they see vance -- the second coming for america and the macy vance getting beat up -- and then they see vance getting beat up, to they believe those things? i think the people in the rust belt have more common sense and they see the media is beating not just trump up but the whole conservative movement. we want low taxes. we want the border secure. we see the world blowing up. we see the democrats do not say anything about it and we see the media does not say anything about the negativity. kamala harris says she will help the tips, the waitresses will not be taxed on their tips. meanwhile she was the deciding vote to break the 50/50 tie to send the irs after the people that get tips. host: what do you think? guest: i just read in the new york times this morning, there is an op-ed pillorying vice president harris and donald trump further policy of not taxing tips. i shook my head. it is the legacy media that does not understand how you appeal to working-class voters. i worked in restaurants for years. i can tell you, that is really appealing to tipped employees. that matters. it might seem like a small policy but is a signal that people in washington understand you, get you. that is what working-class americans -- they do not think. i grew up in this mill you. they do not think that people in washington or wall street or hollywood fully understand and get them. i will say, i read "hillbilly elegy" when it came out. i even assigned it to my classes as way to understand the from vote. i think it is a good book. the movie made by ronoward was a good movie. i grew up in a very similar circumstance. it rings true to me. it is very odd help vance is being attacked on how he faked his biography. that is odd. there are particulars about j.d. vance and how he first thought donald trump was terrible and now thinks he is great that you can attack him on. it is strange to me. the question about how people in the rust belt will take these attacks on j.d. vance. i think j.d. vance's story, let's imagine he made it up. i don't think he did. i don't think you can write a book like that without it being true. it rings true in the rust belt. the opioid crisis, joblessness, depths of despair gripping our region in a way the rest of america does not fully appreciate. i do not think those attacks on his biography will do anything. he is an authentic kid of the rust belt. whether he is an authentic voice for trump is another thing. i think that is where j.d. vance's contribution to the republican ticket will matter. there is an elit