and rosenstein was one of the first people he interviewed.wasn't there leaves baffling and leads the legitimate suspicions that mueller was tinfluenced to pull some punches there. >> a real honor to have you here. amazing reporting we've come to expect from you. "deep state" is the name of the book. donald trump and the rule of law. this is must-read material it you want to understand what the trump administration is still up to right now. >>> up next chaos in the not so united kingdom by mr. chaos himself, and brexit. this is the chaos story we'd be following every night if g everyf ahhhh! -ahhhh! elliott. you came back! itso chantix can help you quit slow turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in beha

and so rod rosenstein's public claim was that was a joke or his friends say it was a joke. and your witnesses say there was no evidence that was a joke, that was serious. >> that's correct. he said it was a joke. he sort of said he didn't really say it but if he said it was a joke. and there are two akags where he said there are notes of this conversation and more than one set of notes documenting that. there's nothing in those notes to suggest it was a joke and also denied saying he wanted to invoke the 25th amendment and he even named two cabinet level people who were going to support that namely john kelly the chief of staff and sessions the attorney general. >> and the 25th amendment requires a majority of the cabinet plus the vice president so he was going to begin with jeff sessions and with john kelly to get the cabinet to vote. >> it sounded like they'd already discussed it with him and gotten encourage. i think the people who heard it didn't really take it all that seriously. they took it as a measure how unnerved trump was by the fact trump was trying to set him u

he named a special counsel because rosenstein and become angry with the president. he was overwrought. he was emotional. an act of retaliation, he appointed bob muller. anisa thinks about this, 22 month long national nightmare because one guy got angry and he knew what he had done, he knew it was wrong. in the day of the appointment after it was announced, he is confronted in his office about what he had done. his abuse of power, a violation of the relate regulation. and he cowers behind his desk and he lumbers, am i going to get fired. that tells you he knew what he done was wrong. g for your gotten fired earlier, the may be avoided who much drama. go back to this whole idea that donald trump, previa elected to the presidency, this relationship with russia, i just remember, i still have flashbacks to all of the areas of in the run-up to the republican nomination in the general election in 2006 and, there was always this intrigue about donald trump was made by russia room filled up by russia. the constant theme he could, through scarce facts or details of where does

he named a special counsel because rosenstein had become angry with the president. he was overwrought. he was emotional. an active retaliation he appointed bob mueller. think about this. twenty-two month long national nightmare because one guy got angry. he knew what he had done was wrong. the day of the appointment. after it was announced. he is confronted in his office about what he had done. the abuse of a regulation. he cowers behind his desk and he blubber's am i going to get fired. that tells you he knew what he had done was wrong. >> if he had gotten fired earlier, we may have avoided so much of this drama. go back to this whole idea of donald trump pre-being elected to the presidency. this relationship with russia, i still have flashbacks to all the interviews and stuff in the run-up to the republican nomination and the general election of 2016. there was always this intrigue about donald trump made by russia or bailed out by russia. a constant theme. no fax or even details. where did this come from? >> it began originally with hillary clinton in early 2016.

20th, 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. the letter raised concerns about the activities alexander chalupa a contractor for the democratic national committee who worked with embassy officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, chalupa's actions, quote, chalupa's actions appear to show she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine, and on behalf of the dnc and the clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the u.s. voting population but u.s. government officials. unquote. after touting the dossier and defending the fbi's russia investigation, which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa publicly admitted to the

>> i think he did what rod ro rosenstein. he took the easy path. >> what would have been the hard path? >> for those who have read the transcript with a fair mind, it is not as some people made it out to be, including the whistle-blower. >> to be clear and fair to mr. atkinson, that's not his job. his job is to assess the credible, see if he can corroborate it and if so give it to the d.o.j. it is their job and they passed on this. imagine this, my brother. imagine if they hadn't and they had investigated this claim, we may not be here right now. >> well, if rod rosenstein was over at the d.o.j., lord only knows what can happen. >> rosenstein was put there by republicans, by the way. >> he was, he was. big mistake. this is one of the problems that the republicans is when they win the presidency. i'm a veteran of the bush administration, is that, you know, those folks who make up the career ranks of these big white buildings in washington, d.c. are 80% for the democrats. >> you think rosenstein was for the democrats after what

>> i think he did what rod rosenstein did. it was easier to send to doj for further action. i don't know if he has an misagainst the president. >> versus what? >> to look at the conversation to see if any crimes were committed. for those of us that read the transcript with a fair mind, it is not as some people made it out to be, including the whistleblower. >> just to be clear and fair to mr. atkinson, that's not his job. his job is to assess the credit nlt, see if he can corroborate it, and give it to the doj. it is their job, and they passed on this. imagine if they hadn't and they investigated this claim, we may not be here right now. >> if rod rosenstein was over at the doj lord only knows what can happen. this is one of the things -- >> rosenstein was put there by republicans. >> he was. he was. big mistake. this is one of the problems that the republicans have when they win the presidency -- and i'm a veteran of the bush administration -- is those folks who make up the career ranks of these big white buildings in washington, d.c. are 80% for the democrats. >> you think

chief james comey. >> rosenstein was actually openly talking about whether there was a majority of the cabinet who would vote to remove the president? >> that's correct, counting votes or possible votes. >> reporter: in an interview to air on cbs sunday morning, norah o'donnell asked former u.n. ambassador nikki haley about efforts to oust the president from office. >> were you ever part of any discussion invoking the 25th amendment against the president? >> the 25th amendment never came up in any discussion i had. >> reporter: even though this book doesn't come out until later this month, it's already near the top of the bestseller list. white house press secretary stephanie grisham came out with a sarcastic statement on the book's author, saying, "it takes a lot of conviction and bravery to write a whole book anonymously." norah? >> o'donnell: paula, thank you. all right. it is time to bundle up fast. an icy blast of arctic air is invading a big part of the country tonight. it's already dusted the campus of michigan tech in snow. beautiful. more than 70% of americans will face freezi

rosenstein and i had was simply rod kind of gaming things out in his head.ever thought he'd -- he never indicated to me that he talked about it with anyone else or that the people he was thinking about, that he'd had any conversations with them. this is really like he thought this person and that person might go along with it, but he never indicated he's actually discussed it with them. >> why do you think these white house officials were so certain that the vice president would even sign on to this? right? you have to have majority of the cabinet, vice president's approval and then it goes to congress. we should also note the vice president did not say this directly. this was the belief among white house staff. why do you think? >> well, i don't know. i can only say, brooke, that the fact that, you know, it was something that was on the deputy attorney general's mind, and now the possibility that it might have been a topic on the minds of other white house staffers or aides, i think shows you just how tumultuous and kind of unnerving that whole period was.

rosenstein has said the stories are not true, but in any case, this is not the first time we've heard a similar story. people at high levels of the trump administration discussing the 25th amendment, and it all seems to have been around the same period of time which is when president trump had james comey, then the fbi director, fired and then mueller was appointed and president trump had a period of time where a lot of his aides even thought that his behavior was rather unhinged. >> fascinating. that's an important point. there were a lot of people panicking, obviously. thank you so much for that reporting. >> of course. >> good to see you, jake. reporters are test-driving president trump saying he's too inept for a quid pro quo. sto >>> plus the president is denying that he asked bill barr to clear him in a press conference. >>> and france's president macron saying trump is killing nato, which he describes as brain dead. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started

. >> former deputy attorney general rod rosenstein had already testified, i think this happened last correct me if i'm wrong, rod rosenstein had testified that a fisa warrant renewal that he signed off on did not match public reports about it. watch this. >> no fbi personnel briefed me on it, the process with a fisa application and renewal come up to the fbi chain of command and sworn under oath by crew federal agent. >> you signed it. >> all expend the process. >> did you thoroughly review it? >> let me explain. >> i'm out of time. >> the times has expired. >> we sit down with the team of attorneys with the department of justice to review that and provide everything for what isn't it and i review that in some detail and i tell you the information public does not matter my understanding of the one i signed. >> i think it's appropriate to let the inspector general complete the investigation. >> we know there was a lot of leaks, here is the thing there is into trump bias from the fbi officials, these officials are leaking peter found that he wanted to sit on the hillary e-mails with an

like deputy attorney general rod rosenstein did because attorney general jeff sessions recused him.hat's the person that made that decision. bill barr decided this doesn't warrant scrutiny period, it appears, because the whistleblower complaint was retained within the executive branch because congress found out about it. so i understand ken starr's concern. the fact is a thorough professional process. we saw it with robert mueller. in this instance that's not available to congress. congress as i said has to wear two hats. they have to develop the facts and do that publicly in a political setting just means a lot of rhetoric. it doesn't necessarily get to the facts themselves. and they are going to have to make the political judgment. i don't agree with judge starr that this process is a sham. i don't know how else it is feasible to have it unfold under what's clearly authorized in the constitution and that is impeachment. host: one other point, we saw house republicans storm into these closed door sessions. who is in these hearings? are republicans allowed to be in the hearings? can

rod being rod rosenstein, the deputy attorney general at the time. mcgahn recalled the president telling him, quote, mueller has to go. call me back when you do it. mcgahn understood the president to be saying the special counsel had to be removed by rosenstein, which you could connect to obstruction of justice. when the president says this guy says i'm great, usual when you do your homework, it's not always the case. >> it's not always the case. the tweets you see from the president go along with his public portrayal of how he's trying to defend himself. he's saying this is a sham, democrats are coming after me, it's the witch hunt 2.0. his comments go along with that. they're trying to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks. >> adam schiff says as soon as next week he will send a report to the judiciary committee. the committee then decides whether or not to draft articles of impeachment. the question is how broad will they be, how many, and how fast does that schedule proceed from there. it is not mutually exclusive. the house keeps its r

he attacked rod rosenstein for the tenure of his investigation.nd now he sought to have his attorney general say he hadn't broken any laws. the thread that runs through it is when he's guilty he wants high-level people in the law and order wings of the u.s. government to say he isn't. >> yeah. to come out and do it in a very public way. i think the comey example is maybe the most parallel. so comey is telling him privately, look, sir, you are not a target of this investigation, at least not right now. but because comey won't go out and say it publicly after multiple requests, the president fires him. then insists on making that a part of sort of the firing letter. he doesn't even sort of try to hide behind the pretenses. he says thanks for telling me three times i wasn't under investigation. because it just so vexes him that jim comey won't go out and say that. maybe we are seeing the early signs of that with barr. this is not a session situation yet. but it certainly is parallel to some things we have seen in the past. >> that's right. the comey

subject of a july 20th 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander chalupa a contractor for the democratic national committee who worked with the ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the truck campaign a senator grassley wrote. children actual quote chalupa is actions appear to show that she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government ukraine and on behalf of the d.n.c. and the clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the us voting population but u.s. government officials unquote after touting the still dossier and defending the f.b.i.'s russia investigation which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general bar democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa publicly admitted to the democrats scheme likewise they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding 100 biden's well paid position on the board of a corrupt ukrainian company while his father served as vice president and po

. >> i'm also reminded of the rod rosenstein story, the allegations he talked bin joking the 25th amendment. i would also draw a distinction between rex tillerson and general john kelly. tillerson was well known for going around the country bad mouthing the president. kelly's response to nikki haley's book was interesting, he said if by subverting you mean trying to set up a process where the president heard all sides and we made methodical decisions, i plead guilty. there are different versions about what they were proposing to her. lou: let's put up the kelly response. he said if by resistance and stalling she means muting a staff process in place insuring the president knew all the pros and cons of what policy decision he might be contemplating so he he could make an informed decision. then guilty as charged. lou: it could have been interpreted in a lot of ways. >> kelly came into a white house in somewhat disarray. both men previous didn't know how to set it up. kelly did. he understood orderly processes because of his experience in the military. lou: personally it seems to me that the

laura: and senator, i know he had some choice words for you mostly because of the mueller deal and rosenstein. but do you think you will ultimately get his endorsement? >> i hope so. certainly i'm going to work for that and we will be seeking it. he doesn't always get involved in primary so i understand that and he has indicated he probably would not in this one. but yes. i would love to have his support. i ask people first, i have some people of alabama and throughout the country to trust him and support him. i thought he was the one who could win and if you win, i thought he could bring that drive, that energy, that will because it's extraordinary, to advance his agenda. >> laura: you are absolutely right. i was in alabama over the weekend and overwhelming support for you there. senator sessions, thanks for being with us tonight. democrats might be enjoying this impeachment circuit today but how will they feel about it in a couple of months? dan bongino and chris hahn debate the political fallout for 2020, in moments. >> laura: impeachment has all the radicals fired up now but how's it goin

comey and richard, what is his name, rosenstein like you've never seen before. >> laura: a claymationcomey and he could hide behind the blue curtains and the oval office and do that odd hug. he has kind of like a claymation. >> you have to go. >> laura: foy is the media ignoring that bombshell video that shows abc anchor venting about the refusal to publish jeffrey epstein report? does that tell us about his alleged suicide? answer is, when we return. ♪ >> i've had this interview with virginia roberts on the air. first of all i was told jeffrey epstein no one knows who this is and it's a stupid story. it is unbelievable, we have clinton, we have everything. i am so [bleep] right now. >> laura: the media trying to cover up this bombshell coverage that exposed "abc news" for spiking the jeffrey epstein story. fox news did not find a mention of the on cnn, msnbc, or nvc. in fact the media actually defending the coverage of black out cnm brian seltzer writing caused widespread outrage particularly on the right with many commenters using it to use spell hatred of the writ large. unbelievab

subject of a july 20th 2017 letter sent by senator grassly to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. it raised concerns about the activity of a contractor for the democratic national committee. who worked with ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. at senator grassley wrote, her actions appear to show she was multi simultaneously working on behalf of the campaign. on an effort to influence the u.s. voting population and u.s. government officials. democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa admitted to the democrats scheme. like wide their blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's wael paid position while his father was vice president. but the democrats media hacks only cared about that issue wre briefly when they were trying to stop joe biden from running against hillary clinton in 2015. as i previously stated, these hearings should not be occurring at all until we get the answers to three crucial questions that the democrats refuse to ask. first, what is the full extent of the democrats prio

can you tell us to update us on that and will there be any further hearings with regard to rod rosenstein and andrew mccabe and invoking the 25th amendment and things you have mentioned in the past? >> i'm going to start with horowitz. his report is about done. we'll get him to come before the committee to talk about what he's found in terms of fisa intelligence abuse in the investigation of the trump campaign. i think his report is going to be damning, i think it's going to prove that the system got off the rails and we need corrective action. where we go from there i won't know until i hear from him. i trust horowitz to be fair. i don't trust adam schiff to be fair. i trusted mueller to be fair. i don't trust the house nadler-schiff team to be fair to the president. this whole process in the house is driven bipartisan politicians who hate trump's guts. that's the big difference between mueller and horowitz. >> martha: the american people will get a chance to see what's going on in these public hearings, we hope, as that moves forward. lindsey graham, thank you. >> thank you. >> martha:

are you surprised that rod rosenstein, the government official who appointed bob mueller, was part of sullying any chance of what mueller might have thought would have been the appropriate remedy for his findings, impeachment? >> i have questions that have not been answered. the first is, what was he doing involved at all, since he was witness in at least one of the obstructive incidents in the report? how did that happen? what was he doing as a judge in a matter of which he was a witness. second, what was the thinking that led them to say, we are going to decline any obstruction case against the president? there is insufficient evidence. when among other things, you have never interviewed the president? the obstruction cases always turn on the content of someone's mind. people said to me, when he asked you to drop the flynn case, did you think that was obstruction of justice? it could be, but it depends on what he was thinking. the best way to figure out what he was thinking is to talk the to the person under oath. how you can shut down, decline, say that there is no possibility of a

even the day he released it he came with rosenstein behind him and said similar comments and gave another two hours of false painting. when it finally came out nobody wanted to read 435 pages of l l legalees. and mueller came before us and the wasn't the same dynamic person who fought in vietnam and ran the attorney's office is san francisco. >> attempts to obstruct the russia investigation, would you like to see the articles of impeachment now being considered include misconduct uncovered during the mueller investigation? >> we're all working as a team. speaker pelosi has done a marvelous job bringing us together and the caucus. we will continue to work as a team. i'm sure there will be meetings to discuss this and chairman nadler and schiff and pelosi will talk to us. >> we will see you when you get back to washington on thanksgiving. congressman, thank you for joining us. >> you're welcome, wolf. happy thanksgiving to you. >> happy thanksgiving to you as well. we're staying on top of the breaking news. significant developments. we'll take a quick break be right back. i'm finding it har

>> well, i'm concerned for people like mccabe, call me, even rod rosenstein, anybody who signed off on one of those fisa warrant applications, and concerns -- not really concerned but i believe they are comparable in some way. i also believe the sources are comparable, anyone who suppressed information, but part of this is, the reason i think this got delayed so very much, is remember what horwitz did the last report, which gave people like mccabe, strzok and page, he kept getting whistle-blower at the last minute, so we have been promised this report for literally months which tells me that he had to broaden the scope of his investigation and i think there's going to be a world of hurt for people, perhaps even brennan, flapper, the highest levels of the intelligence community, i think are potentially coupled here. >> sean: thank you both for the report. we appreciated we have a lot of ground to cover tonight. the 2020 democrats are imploding. what they want is the blood of the president and what are they going to do to the country? we will get to that. i one-on-one interview with nikk

if this was a low-level employee, there's a reason why director comey and rod rosenstein and others have to sign off and validate to the court that this is a valid, verified report. because it's a one-way court and it gives you the highest police powers we have. if you want to have to step in because we have some breaking news. we are inside of a two-minute warning right now. president of the united states, in the white house, is holding a gathering. it's an ncaa -- it's a collegiate national championship team. we were just talking about college teams. i expressed my love for the kansas city chiefs. not a college team. we know he has just spoken, so we are waiting for the tape to play out now. we do know, along the shore marks, the impeachment came up. we know from the presidents try to feed today last night that that is something that has been a focus. i want to lean on this for just a second, because we will get to hear him as he welcomes these college teams to the white house. what are your thoughts? >> jason: he spent an hour on "fox & friends" earlier this morning, suggesting that w

in july 2017 when republican senator chuck grassley sent a letter to deputy attorney general rod rosensteinng the doj investigate 2016 election meddling and corruption by ukraine? let's bring in fox news contributor. let me just get to grassley's letter. he cited quote collusion between the hilary clinton campaign, dnc and ukraine. ne they were trying to dig up dirt to trigger congressional probe and hearings to damage the trump campaign. it involves paul manafort. your take? >> listen, i hope they continue to press for these investigations because listen, there are serious allegations in regards to ukraine and the 2016 election and also concerns about former vice president joe biden and his son hunter, his, you know, position on the board of burisma holdings. so clearly, this stuff does need to be looked into. look at how democrats are going all in investigating all things president trump, when you have this issue, for example, biden on tape, on record, on video, saying that he -- the money was going to be withheld if the ukrainian prosecutor was not fired. so clearly there is a huge doubl

in line what you've heard from the "anonymous" book and going back to rod rosenstein raising the ideant. >> and you hear from people inside the white house when there are situations like this where people try to work against the president or go against his decisions is that people say these deep state bureaucrats career officials that is not what john kelly is. that's not what rex tillerson is. and essentially they tried to push back on things they thought the president shouldn't do, not out of political motivation but because it was wrong. you saw that in john kelly's statement saying he provided the president with the best ethical and legal advice is telling us what happened behind closed doors. as the administration tries to push back against the anonymous account of what's happening in the west wing, nikki haley's book gets at that trying to criticize john kelly and rex tillerson, his show the is top two aides to the president thought on multiple occasions he was doing the wrong thing. >> and no response -- >> go ahead. >> john kelly could have said that's not true, i have full an

the last time we read about the cabinet being lobbied, it was rod rosenstein reportedly lobbying the cabinet to support the twenty-fifth amendment. we know that when senior officials are lobbying the cabinet, things are really dark and really bad. >> the other thing that occurs to me here is one of the threads in some of these witnesses who haven't necessarily turned on the president, they may be offer offered a more sympathetic view of these events like gordon sondland, like kurt volker. a lot of the undergirding of their testimony is that, yes, we did these things, but it was never explicit. it was never directly from the president. we didn't talk about these things in detail. he didn't tell me exactly what to do. with john bolton, remember the timeline here. this is somebody who as of july was interrupting meetings where he was concerned about this arrangement being akin to a drug deal. this was a guy who was telling people after that july 25th phone call between president trump and president zelensky was telling them to register their concerns with white house lawyers and memoria

so will the rosenstein trial answer the lingering questions we've had for months about the mueller reportan, who covers intelligence and national security for nbc news and particularly is on this trial. ken, let me start with you. i want to put up a full screen here of the mueller report. volume i, page 51. just a reminder of all the heavy redactions involving stone. harm to ongoing matter, harm to ongoing matter, investigative technique, investigatie ivive technique. it's the harm to ongoing matter. trump campaign showed interest in wikileaks cases in the fall of 2016. harm to ongoing matter. this is the matter. >> i think this is exactly where the material that we are now seeing in the stone trial lies in the mueller report. it's surprising to me that it had to be redacted, because by the time this was released, stone had been indicted and he was entitled to this evidence. so really, the public missed out on a key part of the story, which we're now getting. >> you called this the lost chapter or the last chapter? >> the lost chapter. we've now found it. it's on page 51. and it's a story

four day after i wrote that op-ed, rosenstein appointed special counsel mueller. that, for me, was a sign. not that some guy on a white horse was going come riding in and make it all transparent and clear and convince the people who believe anything that trump says that what mueller has discovered is true. i never thought that. i always realized there would be things that trump could do to undermine the face of the american people in robert mueller, despite his integrity and how despite his support was when he was named. but it did seem to me that while that probe was going on, and it's been extraordinarily productivity with guilty pleas and people cooperating and indictments, while the probe was going on, we should hold steady, that we shouldn't jump ahead, we should continue investigating, we have a chapter in our book that i think joshua will enjoy describing because it's fun to write. i think it will be fun to read, about impeachment talk and how dangerous it can be to have too much of it, but it's not dangerous to have too much impeachment thought, and impeac

subject of a july 20th, 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. the letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander cha lupe, a contractor for the democratic national committee who worked with ukrainian national officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, quote, cha lupe's actions appear to show she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine, and on behalf of the dnc and i an effoo influence not only the u.s. voting population, but u.s. government officials, unquote. after touting the steele dossier and defending the fbi's russia investigation, which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr, democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though cha lupe publicly admitted to the democrats' scheme. likewise they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's well-paid position on the board of a corrupt ukrainian company while his father served as vice president and point man for ukraine issues in

. >> even the ordering of the ig report was reportedly done by rod rosenstein to appease the president. i think, you know, hogan gidley can say whatever he wants. he's said a lot of things that aren't true. but for the attorney general of the united states under oath before congress to say he thinks there was spying and he had access to all sorts of information, i think just goes to how institutions have been politicized and undermined across the board. you can take any day. we've talked this morning about the military and the pentagon being under mine. doj. the state department. all of these career foreign service officers. as john -- to quote john dean, there's a cancer in this white house. and it has metastasized to all branches of government. >> just earlier this week, too, you made me think of secretary pompeo was asked about investigating ukraine. the former cia director who wouldn't even push back on -- >> such a good point. this is the same thing. >> here in this white house, any questioning of the president's theories, whether they are legitimate or not is viewed as disloyalty

subject of a july 20th, 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. the letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander cha lupa, a contractor for the democrat national committee who worked with ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, quote, chalupa's actions appear to show she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine and on behalf of the dnc and the clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the u.s. voting population, but u.s. government officials, unquote. after touting the steele doesier and defending the fbi's russia investigation which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr, democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa publicly admitted to the democrats' scheme. like-wise, they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's well-paid position on the board of a corrupt ukrainian company while his father served as vice-president and point man

subject of a july 20, 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. the letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander chalupa, a contractor for the democratic national committee who worked with ukraine embassy officials to spread dirt on trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, chalupa's actions appear to show that she was working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine, and on behalf of the dnc and the clinton campaign. in an effort to influence not only the u.s. voting population, but u.s. government officials. unquote. after touting the steele dossier and defending the f.b.i.'s russia investigation which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr, democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa admitted to the democrats' scheme. likewise, they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's well-baid position on the board of a corrupt ukraine company while his father served as vice president and point man for ukraine issues in the oba

subject of a july 20th, 2017, letter sent by senator grassley to then-deputy attorney general rod rosenstein chalupa, a contractor for the national democratic committee who worked with ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, chalupa's actions appear to show that she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine, and on behalf of the dnc and the clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the u.s. voting population but u.s. government officials, unquote. after touting the steele dossier and defending the fbi's russia investigation, which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr, democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling, even though chalupa publicly admitted to the democrats' scheme. likewise, they're blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's well-paid position on the board of a corrupt ukrainian company while his father served as vice president and point man. but the democrats media hacks only cared about that issue brie

subject of a july 20th, 2017 letter sent by senator grassley to then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. the letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander cha lupa, a contractor for the democrat national committee who worked with ukrainian embassy officials to spread dirt on the trump campaign. as senator grassley wrote, quote, chalupa's actions appear to show she was simultaneously working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine and on behalf of the dnc and the clinton campaign in an effort to influence not only the u.s. voting population, but u.s. government officials, unquote. after touting the steele doesier and defending the fbi's russia investigation which are now being investigated by inspector general horowitz and attorney general barr, democrats on this committee ignore ukrainian election meddling even though chalupa publicly admitted to the democrats' scheme. like-wise, they are blind to the blaring signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden's well-paid position on the board of a corrupt ukrainian company while his father served as vice-president and point man

pulled that all off with of the second in command at the department of justice, rod rosenstein. so as those recommendations unfolded, we had the mueller as comeyecial counsel, james was fired by the president. he resisted that, of course, but report, then, as they dug through that and spent nearly $30 million and they had team of never trumpers that they put on to investigate and all the while they were smoking gun. the i am going to use the term the blue dress, the reasons they donald trump. they never found it. and so nearly two years of the investigation, democrats in this town and across the anxiously e just this g, when will information will come out until we say, we got you? hen you can investigate when there is not a crime when you want to find a person guilty is not guilty and scour up something that you can use to declare the man to be guilty what you t you can do already wanted to do which was remove this president from and if they can't remove him from office they want to so they m ineffective agenda down on him and at the very least they want to wound him in such a w

letters the subject of a run by a senator to rosenstein. letter raised concerns about the activities of alexander urtula but, a contractor for the dnc who worked with the ukrainian embassy to spread dirt on the trump campaign. histor grassley wrote actions appear to show she was working on behalf of a foreign government, ukraine. after touting the steele dossier and defending the russian investigation, which are now being investigated by the attorney general, democrats ignore ukrainian election meddling even though children but admitted to the scheme. they are blind to the signs of corruption surrounding hunter biden. the democrats media hacks only care about that briefly. they were trying to stop joe biden from running against hillary clinton. these hearings should not be occurring at all until we get the answers to three questions. the is the full extent of coordination with the whistleblower? what is the full extent of ukraine's election meddling? why did burisma hire hunter biden, what did he do for them? house democrats vowed they woul